Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Technical quality is the big selling point
If you like petite models, you will love this site
Videos can be downloaded in 4k or HD
Over 500 scenes
Pretty pictures you can download
Good mix of models
Cons:
No bonus content
If you don't download 4k videos, it really does take away the best part of the content
Bottom Line:
Tiny 4k was one of the first sites I joined to test out my first 4k monitor. I sincerely believe the 4k downloads is the strongest pro the site offers. There are lots of Petite sites, but I don't know of any with over 500 4k videos. There are plenty of chances to make funnies about the 4k resolution. Like saying the models look even tinier in 4k.
The content is fairly typical hardcore porn. It's like there is a ladder with the strengths deciding if you would join or not. You have excellent 4k quality AND beautiful and sexy petite models.
I do like the ethnic/racial blend of the models. It shouldn't be a surprise to see the blend. The company that owns Tiny 4k also owns Exotic 4k. Which is one of the better exotic model sites. But also reminds us it's not included with Tiny 4k. With that said, you can receive offers to join multiple 4k sites and you can add them on to your current subscription.
I will mention these are not just technical showcase videos. Most of the scenes last over 30 minutes and all the scenes have an excellent photoset included. I do know that there are sites releasing 4k videos and seen to think that high quality resolution is all they need to focus on. I believe Tiny 4k has the best 4k hardcore scenes and a big part of that is the quality of the models.
The site’s navigation is very good and just as important, adding on other sites in the 4k family of sites is simple. I do believe the technical quality, plus model quality, add in the ease of use and simple add site/cancel, keeps me coming back as a member two or three times a year.
There are no real stories or plots in the scenes. Other than there's a tiny model who is going to get naked and have sex for your viewing pleasure. You will find favorite models from other sites, and will find some you have never seen before. You may even be surprised by how many of these small models have natural breasts.
I do prefer joining when they're having a special that includes more than one site. I have done that several times and have been very satisfied with the package deals.
I believe this site and the other 4k sites are at the top of the 4k porn industry. They don't skimp on anything. I would rate the ease of use as high as any site. It's also a great site if you're into hardcore photos.
I just can't pull the trigger on a higher score because of no bonus content. Each time I join, I say I'm not going to join any of their add-on sites and then I do. It's usually that fast too. I don't even finish the thought to myself about not joining an add-on.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is a re-review of Viv Thomas, which I reviewed just about a year ago. I’m still a member on it..
In my opinion, the prettiest models on any pornsite, sure, most of the models are on other sites too, but Viv Thomas’ site has magic other sites don’t have.
There are 3,617 photo sets to download and 2,424 videos to download.
There are 1,217 models.
The downloadable videos are unlimited and newer ones have 4K.
It’s a Met-Art Network site so it has the navigation, usability and all the bells and whistles
The most passionate lesbian scenes I have ever viewed.
Cons:
I have read complaints in the scene comments about old scenes being removed.
It has kept me hostage as a member for over a year. I just can’t talk myself into canceling.
Bottom Line:
It’s not uncommon for us to re-review favorite sites, but this re-review was brought on by me staying as a member way longer than I thought I would. I think that’s the very biggest compliment to a site. Viv Thomas has always been a name in porn that I have been drawn to. I used to look up his videos on tube sites. Back then, I didn’t even know this site existed. I have always felt like Vivid was the only studio that could make porn as good as Viv Thomas. I am speaking solely on the lesbian genre.
The site has all the technical numbers you could ever want. There are 2,424 videos and the newer ones can be downloaded in 4K resolution, even though I do only download in 720 and 1080. The picture sets are spectacular with 5700x3700 resolution on the large zip filed pictures. There’s a purpose with every photo. If you flip through them you can watch the women in motion.
There are roughly 5-6 updates per week.
During my second month of membership, I decided to keep letting the subscription recur and that was over 10 months ago. I just didn’t think there was a site that could impress me that much and keep my attention on it. But Viv Thomas has
Why did I list the models looks as a pro when they are on other sites? Viv Thomas site gets a different version of the models. They are more feminine, sexier, less-robotic and look like everyone of them is competing to have the best, sexiest, hottest scene on Viv’s site. I have been buying and collecting porn long enough to know the older scenes are the best. Now a current producer/director on Viv Thomas, retired model Sandra Shine – has scenes on Viv Thomas, of her as the star that blow away newer scenes on any site. There are years, not a handful of updates, that every scene is a little hotter than the previous one.
Clothed women, touching each other, kissing, tongues touching, until the clothes seemingly just melts off their bodies. Maybe it is the sign of the times in porn? The Viv Thomas new scenes are very good and, in my opinion, as good as any lesbian site’s scenes, but it’s those older scenes you have to watch. It doesn’t even matter if you like the models. You won’t see this much heat in a scene on any other site. Maybe you can, but I sure can’t.
The site is owned or managed by Met-Art now and you can see that. The videos/films are in a tab, the photos are in a tab and the model list is in a tab. It’s that simple and it’s another reason I love this site. I did join Viv Thomas a long time ago. It had a video site and a photo site back then. Having all this content on one easy to use site makes me not want to cancel!
I do think it’s humorous to read the comments on the different scenes. You will always have that one guy that says all they need is a dick in the scene. That’s because he is that turned on by the scene! I have seen some of the male/female Viv Thomas scenes from the late 90s and they are good, but I don’t see the removal of those as anything to be that upset about. It looks like Met-Art decided to promote Viv Thomas’ lesbian scenes and who could possibly argue with their decision?
In my now 14 months of membership, I could stop joining other sites and just join Viv Thomas. It’s that good . The scenes are not only believable, but are so hot they become nearly unbelievable.
A site like this one could hurt my viewing of other porn. I want to see the models looking like they are willing to tear their paycheck up. Scenes that are that good are very rare, but I could list over 100 from Viv Thomas that gave me that feeling. Combine that quality with the technical aspects and I have what is my perfect site.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The pint-sized, fun-sized ladies are in droves at ATK Petites
Exclusive and premium quality picture sets which can be downloaded
Videos are good, but are mostly softcore
The site works perfectly
Regular updates
Acceptable, even good priced for a site that is high on premium quality content
Cons:
You will not find much hardcore sex on this site
Minimal make-up on models. I like that, but respect that some may not
Bottom Line:
One of the best ways for me to describe ATK Petites is to say when I open their model list, I feel like I’m opening a catalog for diminutive lifestyles. The models are nearly all very cute, tiny and some are unexpectedly curvy. This is the greatest strength of this site and any of the ATK sites. The content looks like ATK content. It’s 100% exclusive. The filming style is consistent from ATK site to ATK site. The belief that the models should look like normal, attractive ladies, is also present. You will not see many models that look like they needed a few hours and a small clique of people to prepare their make-up. The clothing choices look just like any woman you may see at the grocery store.
ATK has high standards for video and photo quality. The videos are sharp and nice color contrast is used in the backgrounds. The pictures are large and professional. Hence, my comparison to a catalog. Each model is not only there for your interest, but the pictures and videos work as advertisements for how sexy the models are – or aren’t.
There is rarely a story in any of the videos. You may even forget the cameraman or camerawoman is even there. That is what makes ATK sites some of my favorites. They try everything to make porn that’s not like every other porn studio.
The navigation of ATK Petites is as good as it gets. The model list takes you to any model you’re interested in. Clear and easy to find “photos” and “videos” sections. The download options are neatly arranged and easy to understand. The layout of the model pages are clean and uniform from model to model.
Your most legitimate complaint with ATK Petites is the lack of hardcore sex. It’s there, it’s just not the focus and I doubt it ever will be. The focus is how attractive the models are. How sexy and even innocent they are and the ladies are performing for you, the viewer, not a stunt dick.
The site continues to update with new, fresh, innocent and sweet models. A pro that I have developed with the ATK sites is you may not ever see these models anywhere else. That makes the exclusive part of the site very important. You are going to see models you have never seen before and likely will not ever see them again. I highly recommend all of the ATK sites depending on your preference in model type.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network. There are no sites you have to pay extra for.
-One of the sites in the Nubiles Porn network is Nubiles.net, which like an encyclopedia of young Eastern porn starlets. Some PU members are not aware that Nubiles.net is part of the Nubiles Porn network, since Nubiles.net is not displayed as prominently as most of the other sites in the network.
-PU discount gives you a price of $19.98/month, or $99.95/year. But if you look, you can sometime find a price of $84/year during holiday discounts.
-Navigation is good. Can easily switch between sites.
-Since the site is small (only 39 videos), you can easily look through all the videos to see which might appeal to you.
-Seach engine is good.
-Models are mainly cute, nubile teens or early 20s.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Can stream or download in 270p through 1080p definition.
Cons:
-The main con is this is an archive site. Stopped updating in 2019.
-Small site. Only 39 videos (and matching photo sets).
-Little variation in the models. They are slender white teens. No medium or big girls, no blacks or asian or even hispanic.
Bottom Line:
Site theme is young girls in ballerina costumes are practicing their ballet routines, a male ballet dancer shows up, he might spend a minute or two helping her with her routine, and then they fuck. Not much build-up to the sex. Minimal romance.
It's nice watching these nubile young bodies flexing and bending and twisting around while having sex, and the models are mainly attractive, but I enjoy watching sex with more meaning behind it.
Horny goddess Evelin almost has her ballet routine down pat. She's just finishing up with her practice session when her coach Ricky Rascal joins her and makes it clear that he wants to practice something a little more sultry. As Ricky pulls Evelin's dress down to suckle her small tits and then keeps going so that he can lick and finger her creamy bare twat, Evelin whimpers her approval of her coach's every move.
When Evelin decides to return the favor, Ricky is all smiles. He maintains eye contact as his hot young coed licks and sucks his hardon, and then bends her onto her hands and knees so that he can pound into her from behind. Their doggy style fuck may have been frantic, but things just get hotter when Evelin rides Ricky until she is screaming with orgasmic bliss.
Repositioning herself on her side, Evelin sighs with happiness when Ricky spoons with her to enter her from behind. His long strokes are just what this cum hungry babe needs to get off again. This time, Ricky joins her as he gluts her bald fuck hole with a shot of hot cum.
====
The plot synopsis makes it sound as if there's more heat to the video than there is.
Yes, the video is crystal clear, with good technical features: crisp colors, good sound control, excellent lighting, and an attractive model. But the sex is by-the-numbers, with theatrical heavy breathing and moans and gasps. I much prefer the videos at Teen Mega World or Diesel network, which, for me at least, seem more realistic, with the models maybe getting off for real on the sex.
The main negatives are: It's a small site, and it stopped updating years ago. And, for me, at least, the videos lack heat.
And the videos, while displaying a lot of attractive teen flesh, don't hold my interest. There are better sites in the network.
I'm giving the site a score of 80. The concept of nubile ballerinas might be good, but they don't bother to embellish it.
The 80 score is because the network has better sites you can visit.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A truly enduring porn site that may get lost in the Met-Art network
Viv Thomas was one of the originators of internet, softcore, passionate female porn.
Updates several times per week.
There are over 5,000 videos and photosets.
Everything is downloadable, including HD videos and photosets.
That great navigation all Met-Art Network sites have.
Cons:
Some of the scenes feel old, but may be just released. It has something to do with the camera or filter they use.
It has been noted before in my reviews and other reviews -- the male/female content has been removed.
Bottom Line:
Viv Thomas hides itself well on the Met-Art Network. Nearly every site on the network is softcore or all-female. Viv Thomas was shooting heartcore porn before it became popular and this continues that tradition. I still do not know why they removed the male/female scenes, but it may have something to do with those videos being older and unable to remaster to 2023-quality standards.
Even without the male/female scenes you are getting very good solo and lesbian porn. It is a strange niche to focus on when talking about porn, but no one does passionate kissing better than Viv Thomas. If you like seeing two pretty women kissing each other to full arousal, you will not be disappointed in the content on Viv Thomas.
I won’t claim to know what Viv Thomas was trying in his heyday, but it does look like he tried to bring a softer, more passionate side to porn. Many of the older lesbian videos on Viv Thomas show my point. The women, often major star European models, lose all control and the scenes take on a real feel instead of porn feel. The kissing, touching, is a major part of Viv Thomas videos.
The navigation is the standard Met-Art Network navigation. You have easy to see, read and click tabs that take you to videos, photos, models list and so on. There are not only over 5,000 combined videos and photosets, but also 5, sometimes more, updates per week.
I usually join the site around the holidays as they have the $5 per month special promo. I’ve never been disappointed with the site or content.
I could probably nitpick and say the older scenes are much better than the newer ones, but I believe that is to be assumed and expected. The big difference could be that Viv is no longer producing the scenes or the talent was better back when he was. I'm going to go with a little of both.
Those into high production and action that feels and looks real, you should check Viv Thomas out -- you might agree that it’s at least in the discussion for best porn site.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Tiny women seeing if they can bite off more than they can chew.
- Ultra high quality with 4K available on all scenes and 1080p and 720p, too.
- Great photosets with downloadable zips.
- One of those sites that I expect to keep every video I downloaded.
- Good production values and nothing to make you say they screwed that scene up. They didn’t.
- Fast downloads at 90% of my max.
Cons:
- It's a smaller site, which only seems right considering the niche. There are 63 scenes currently.
- Updates are sporadic. They will have one per month then will go 3 months with 0. I guess that’s something that can’t be avoided. They stick that petites tag. It isn’t their fault if they only had 5’3” and over models for the last 30 shoots.
Bottom Line:
A lot of sites that do the petite niche do so in a way that is a little degrading or like it’s a circus scene. They do that a little in these scenes, but they have male talent that I always see working with petite models. Those males are at least entertaining like Charles Dera and his goofy ass. You can tell that he enjoys being with these women. That’s a big part to making successful and believable porn. Maybe they are silly and having too much fun or maybe your bedroom life needs a kickstart? They do not stay in that mode of silly. It seems to be more of a lead-in and it does look to make the females more comfortable.
I think my first pro said it better than anything could. The site is seeing these tiny women trying to take one and sometimes two guys. They need some lube wrist bands. It would be like female superhero. The scenes are about right in length, usually just under 30 minutes, a few do go longer and there’s not a lot of wasted space in the scenes. You could advertise one of these scenes to me and have me joining. This may shock you. One of the scenes is the unbelievable Mini-Stallion, she is a young, black model, who is 4’3” 70 pounds. She has no trouble in the scene. She’s a ball of energy.
That is what Cherry Pimps captures with the petites that most petite sites do not capture. The energy, the flexibility, the compacted female. It’s like a 1-inch punch from Bruce Lee. Besides Mini-Stallion, there is Avery Jane, Avery Black, Lana Violet and Spencer Bradley, just to name enough to make me join. They do cross some lines with the humor. One scene has Charles Dera riding around on a bicycle with Spencer Bradley riding in a little trailing cart attached to the bicycle. She makes sure to give you upshorts views. These scenes are good. The production is really good. Even shorter scenes use the time they are allotted. There’s not a lot of wasting time.
The videos all have 4K, 1080, 720 and smaller, likely mobile versions. You are going to get 63 ultra-high quality scenes with some of the best models in the world. Go look at the preview and see for yourself. This network and its sites or series have been long overlooked and it’s a shame. The price isn’t even that high when you figure up how much you are going to download and keep from the network. It’s further proof of quality is more important than quantity. I say that specifically towards this site compared to other petite sites.
I will do a few more of the Cherry Pimp sites and will do a full Cherry Pimp Network review to show what people are missing.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my favorite niches. I think petite women are better for porn. They fit in the screen.
- It’s not updating but it has 228 scenes. There is a site size that makes “not updating” not as important to me. With 228 scenes, I can deal with it not updating.
- A lot of known models. Most of the models are very attractive.
- You can download the photosets, screencaps and videos. All are high quality.
- Good camerawork and I’m going to say it’s because the models are petite. A lot of good closeups.
- Very good download speeds (85% my max)
- Uses CCBill as the billing processor.
Cons:
- It has that vanilla side to it. It’s not bad sex. It’s just they are having sex to be filmed. I don’t know where you draw the line on that.
- Not much variety in the scenes. I will talk about that in the bottom line, that is the downside to petite models.
Bottom Line:
I’m jumping right in with that last con. The best scene from July 2020 to January 2021 is of the model Mina. It is called “You Make Me Want To”. Mina is not only petite, she is also very sexy and she gets up on the bathroom sink with her butt hanging off the edge as a sexual position. That’s the downside to petite models. I expect things like that. I think that is also one of the strengths of petite models. They’re generally more flexible and don’t need as much camera coverage to show all their body. That scene would not be good with a taller woman. Her legs would get in the way. The downside is not all of the models can do these creative positions. I just believe that’s an advantage petite models have but do not take advantage of.
Whatever theme they have on this site is very limited. There are some solo scenes. Which I am always fine with. There’s not much other variety. There are some lesbian scenes. I don’t see anything out of the ordinary with their themes. It’s straightforward and it’s not as much as an insult as it may sound … vanilla. I like vanilla myself. It’s just the scenes are similar and that could be the one turnoff. I think that’s even more of a turnoff than not updating.
The site has 228 scenes. The newer videos can be downloaded in 4K. There isn’t a limit unless I haven’t tried. I don’t see one or any warnings. The photos are always a bonus on Nubiles sites. Those are nearly 6000 long end on the newest ones. The navigation is very good. It’s an easy site to use and download from. I do believe there is a place for this type or porn. It is higher quality than average porn. The models make that happen. The pictures are far above average. Your main concern with this site should be if you get bored with naked people. A lot of times the sexiest part is the title of the scene. They do a good enough job on those to get you interested in the scene. Some of the scenes don’t live up to expectations.
You do get Nubiles network and that makes this site a very acceptable supporting site. I don’t know if they have given up on it. A petite porn site always has potential. That is an old fetish that has been around since, watch the porn history memories, Gauge. She was the petite model that took the internet by storm just after 2000. You can get that energy and passion she had from any of these petite models and it makes for good porn. The site itself couldn’t stand on its own but as a network site it does a good job of offering something different. You have to watch the scenes to find out if a model like Mina is going hop up on the bathroom sink in doggystyle. It’s kind of like a magic trick by having petite models. There’s suspense. I haven’t mentioned this in a review in a long time. They do and have as far as I can remember, use CCBill. I have never had a problem with Nubiles sites or billing with CCBill. That could be a deciding factor for someone.
Good site but it is not the best petite site I have seen. I would recommend hiring Mina as a solo model and just shooting her scenes. Her scene is worth a membership. That’s one of those you download in all download options to make sure you’re future proof.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My wife was a ballerina and she’s petite. You know I’m interested.
- The site is very small, only 39 scenes, it does say it’s active but no updates since September 2019.
- All scenes have 1080p as the highest resolution, but all scenes have it. They have the smaller resolutions, too.
- Fast download speeds at 90% of my max.
- CCBill is the biller.
- It fits the niche well. I will say a little more about ballerinas and maybe they have a no pun intended shortage of models that are ballerinas?
Cons:
- No updates and 39 scenes works more as a tease for me.
- It’s very softcore even when it’s hardcore sex. It really tries to live up to the niche. It’s kind of artsy.
Bottom Line:
I know from real-life experience that there is not a big market anymore for ballet. It makes me wonder if they just can’t find enough ballerinas that are petite, to fuck. It is kind of sad from a porn perspective. This is a niche I believe could be very popular. You’ve got a lot to work with. Flexible women, smaller builds, teasing, and even turning them loose and having them go wild. You don’t really see that in these scenes. I have downloaded all of the scenes. The scenes are not that well thought-out. Some of the scenes are well under 20 minutes. I would take at least 10 minutes to let the ballerina do pirouettes and kick her leg up on the wall. Give some wardrobe slips. I would do something more that focused on the ballerina. That’s how you turn them wild. Pay attention to them for 10 minutes. Give them the spotlight and you will be happy with the result.
This is a Nubiles site. You get the 1080p, 720p, 540p or whatever that middle one is they do and a few mobile ones. I can tell you that downloading all 39 scenes didn’t hit a limit. I also downloaded the photos. It shows that Nubiles knew what they were doing with the pictures. The pictures are 8000 long end. You can get some wardrobe slips in there. They have 20-25 of just the ballerina. It then adds the guy and it shows they didn’t know what they were doing. It should have been 50+ of the ballerina.
The ballerinas they have are pretty and cute. They don’t exactly give off a sexual vibe. That could be the country they are from. I don’t know if these models are or were real ballerinas. My wife looked at some of it. She kind of gave me the twisted nose like, “nope”. If Brandi Love can have 487 stepchildren we can act like they are ballerinas. Which would mean they didn’t run out of ballerinas. I think that is the problem with the site. It tries really hard to stay in that ballet training area and it’s very softcore even during the sex. It’s good enough if you’re really into the niche. I don’t recognize most of the models. It’s not that unusual for me not to know newer models but I usually know a few. I’m guessing these women are from Russia. That is the downfall of using ballet or ballerina as a niche. There’s not a lot here to convince me that’s a ballerina. She is cute, she’s little and she has the right costume on but she’s not very disciplined. This niche could be so much better with the right producer and director. You could work heavy teasing in, clothing fetishes, wardrobe malfunctions but you would have to get away from that very softcore side.
Overall, the site is okay. It’s another freebie for joining Nubiles Porn. I didn’t see much here that’s different than what I saw on Petite HD Porn, also owned by Nubiles. The costume even is not fully updated. That’s a stereotypical costume. I think porn producers are missing out on a whole group of potential models by moving away from women that dance. They like to perform. They like the spotlight. That’s 2/3 of being a porn star. I am being serious. I believe in the right hands this niche could create a very strong site. I have seen the Russian attempts with the contortionists posing as ballerinas. Those were too softcore. It’s that personality contrast. These ballerinas are highly-disciplined. They don’t do anything too risky. You let them. They go wild. There’s my gift to porn producers. This site is a good site to look at if you have a Nubiles membership. It’s not much more than that. I will probably keep the videos just to look over them all but I haven’t seen anything that special about the ones I’ve watched.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
***Petite Models
**New models featured
*Updates happen about once per week
Cons:
***Newer photosets look like higher quality screencaps
**Downloads get throttled if you download too fast or too much
*Needs more TLC for the model pages to help with the experience
Bottom Line:
General information to know before getting into the Exxxtra Small portion of the review is that this site is a part of the Team Skeet network. The network has 83 sites with about half of them being included in the the base membership. That should give you an indication on how many sites they have that are considered "premium," and how they plan to pinch you for that extra penny or so. Of the base plan sites, about 13 of them including Exxxtra Small update on a semi-regular basis, but not always weekly. Most of the sites that are featured are from their partner sites or rehashed scenes from Euro studios.
Exxxtra Small at the time of membership had 393 scenes, but now is at 410+ scenes with screencaps and stills. The newer scenes feature 4K videos, mostly. 4K videos are nice, but if that doesn't matter too much to you and are just focused on the content, then 720p or 580p will be more than sufficient. The models that are featured here are petite spinners showcasing their talents. And who doesn't like seeing that? It is nice to see fresh faces in the industry before they make it big and don't return. Think of it as watching the growth of a major talent. Some of the big names to have had graced the site are Veronica Rodriguez, Riley Reid, and Janice Griffith to name a few.
There really isn't much to knock on this site other than maybe the photosets. The newer scenes look like they are just glorified screencaps. If I were to venture a guess as to why this would be, I would say that with the increasing collection of 4K videos, it is just easier to use that with the high frame rate to compensate for the photosets than to do actual stills. Call me old fashioned, but the antiquated approach is still better.
Overall, Exxxtra Small carries Team Skeet. If we exclude the premium sites and the the partner sites, there really isn't much there in the way of original content in recent months. This plus three other sites that update somewhat regularly were the only ones that kept me around for as long as I did. For that, I do feel it justified to give the site a 90 being that the content that is supplied is worthwhile and satisfying to watch as compared to the rest of the sites on the network. One could also make the argument that it is one of the better petite/teen sites out there when compared to similar typed sites. It is certainly worth the try even if it is only for a one month period.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network, a network dedicated to attractive teen models.
Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network.
No sites in the network require an upgraded payment.
You get access to 18 sites in the network.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-You have a choice of a photoset or a screencap set. The screencap set is smaller than the photoset. Screencap sets average around 33 screencaps, while the photosets average 60-160 photos.
-The models are almost all attractive or cute, and the photosets are worth keeping. If the models weren't so cute, the screencaps might be worth collecting, but since the models are really good-looking, I'd collect the photosets, since the cost of storage keeps dropping every year.
-Photosets have 3 zip files: small, medium, large.
-Screencaps sets have 1 zip file: 1920x1080px.
-Newer videos starting around Oct 2020 have 270p through 2160p (4K). Before that, 1080p was the highest definition.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can select video play speed at 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0. I'm not sure why anyone would watch at other than 1.0, but you have your choice.
-You can comment on the videos and photosets. They allow negative comments to remain. Some other sites remove negative comments, but not this network.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor. I think the network and the site are first class.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The star of the network is nubiles.net, which is like an encyclopedia of young porn stars. I'm listing it as a con, because they don't showcase that site the way it deserves, and many people are not aware that nubiles.net is included in the Nubiles Porn network. Which is a shame, because nubiles.net, by itself, is worth the membership price.
-Models are slender white teens to twenties, but they all look attractive to fucking attractive. Not a lot of variety: no blacks, hispanic, asian, that I could find.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-The videos are basically sex between young models. There is minimal plot. But the models are so attractive, so fucking desirable, that a plot isn't needed (although some plot would give more meaning to the sex).
-You can be logged out of the site for inactivity. Not sure how long it takes. I'm writing this review, I was logged out because instead of switching around the sites or different videos, I was writing this review, and I got logged out. Very minor con.
-There is a model page for each model, with links to her content at the network, but a model listing would be a nice feature.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Launch date: Oct 29, 2013
Videos: 226
Photosets (and screencaps): 226 (a matching photoset and screencap for each video)
Photosets: average around 60 to 160 photos
Sceencap sets: average around 33 screencaps
-The main draw of the site (and the network) is the attractive collection of teen and twenty-some models. They are almost all attractive to really attractive.
The site mainly features boy/girl sex. But there is some lesbian sex, with girl on girl. And a few videos feature 2 boys on 1 girl.
The oldest video has a posting date of Oct 29, 2013, and it offers your choice of 270p through 1080p. The oldest videos showcase cute teens, and the videos are excellent quality: professional lighting and sound control, good camera work, nice sets. A quality product, right from the start of this site.
The models are naturally attractive: They are young women, with few obvious implants, not a lot of tattoos, not a lot of piercings(except a belly button stud is very popular).
-The videos have little or no plot, that's a plus, because most porn models are very poor actors. So you don't have to listen to lame dialog, or watch models trying to act a part, other than trying to show excitement about getting fucked.
If you're into teen and early twenties models who are slender white teens that are attractive to gorgeous, this site and network has plenty of models that are worth watching. The sex is bread and butter, not over the top, just young models who enjoy getting fucked. The videos are clear and crisp, excellent colors, and you just have to enjoy watching these lovelies in action.
Giving the site a score of 95.
Not only do you have a fairly large site of lovely young models, you also gain access to a teen-oriented network that gives you an outstanding collection of teen/twenty-something models.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The master of softcore, leg, lesbian porn.
- I have been joining Viv’s sites dating back to when he had two sites and I still believe it’s the best lesbian porn available. From a man’s perspective.
- Looks like there’s a daily update of either photoset or video, or it’s really close.
- 1,113 models and they include the majority of the finest models to ever grace the Earth.
- There are now 2,195 videos and 3,390 photosets. All are downloadable.
- The ease of using the site is important for anyone that remembers the old Viv sites. Met Art now manages it or owns it. I’m not for sure which but the navigation improvement is a big part of my score.
- Good download speeds (80% of max).
- Nearly all the old videos are still here but do see the cons.
- This is one of those pros that has to be mentioned. Some of the photosets have photos that are 9000x6000. There’s nothing else to say about that.
Cons:
- Made that fast: Some of the old videos are gone. What it looks like to me is the male/female scenes are all gone. I will go into that in the bottom line. It’s not a big deal for me since I still have those on a hard drive.
- I know that Sandra Shine does some producing and she was a great model, one of my favorites but no one really captures Viv’s style. I do think the older scenes are generally better but it’s not by much. If it makes Sandra feel any better, my all-time favorite Viv scene is Pink Velvet 3, part 5, Sandra Shine and Eve Angel in the most passionate, unbelievable lesbian scene I ever watched.
Bottom Line:
I always mention DDF’s name when talking about Viv Thomas. I felt like they made the boom of 2005-2009 in internet porn, happen. I am going to start with that con. I don’t know how many male/female scenes there were on this site but one I remember very well was Jo, Eve Angel and a guy that was supposed to be a professor or something like that. Neither Eve nor Jo was known for their male/female scenes. I don’t think they had even 10 male/female scenes between them. It was more of a collector video to me. I have it on a hard drive. I don’t remember Jo doing anything with the guy but Eve did and it as common as hardcore is these days, was uncommon back then to see them in a hardcore scene. I don’t think there were a lot of male/female scenes but those were really good. If you didn’t know those were there you wouldn’t think much about it but I am mentioning it for those collectors out there that maybe lost their old scenes. I don’t see it. It could be here but I don’t think it is. The old lesbian scenes are. I thought Eve’s lesbian scene with highly underrated model Lisa C, was one of the very best lesbian scenes. I do believe Viv’s production played a big role in that. He had Eve and Lisa C meet at a hotel room and the first 5 minutes of it has them kissing, groping each other over their clothes and against the walls. They couldn’t keep their hands off each other long enough to take their clothes off.
And just a little on that Eve and Sandra scene. They are either being nurses or maids. The scene starts and they get so into the sex it really looks like Sandra instinctually sticks one of her fingers in Eve’s butt. That was not common for Eve back then. The scenes felt like Viv directed how things started and he kind of let the models start improvising and adding, no subtracting.
It is still that good of a site. I know subjectivity plays a part there. If you are looking for what looks like real sex, this is it. If you couldn’t see what was going on, you wouldn’t know a cameraman was there.
The site is very large with excellent navigation. There used to be I think this is how it was split, there was a Viv Thomas photos site and a Viv Thomas videos site. It’s all here now and they’re updating daily. I hate to say I think it’s even better than Met-Art but I do and it is based on my preferences. The models are more built on Viv Thomas. This is the pinnacle of lesbian porn. I have been told to say from a male’s perspective. Maybe it’s not the most realistic lesbian porn but from a male’s perspective there are at least two very pretty, naked, sexy women, rolling around, kissing, licking and fingering. That is what separated Viv Thomas. I don’t think he tried to do anything except show off multiple women at one time. It’s what nearly every lesbian site up to the ones on Adult Time, tried to do. Most failed.
There are nearly 2,200 videos and the newer ones do have 4K. It’s all downloadable. There are nearly 3,400 photosets and as told in the pros, some of these go up to 9000 long end on the photos. The quality is there, the quantity is there, the name behind it. There’s not any, “Squish her face with your foot” or “rip her asshole open”. Having said that, it’s still not what I would call softcore. These women go at it. There are still some solo scenes too. They have good tags. Once again, just missed 100
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Site features models who are mainly young white, slender teens who are role-playing ballerinas. The models are mainly attractive and flexible, which is important when getting fucked. I get out of breath when bending over (I'm in my 70s), but these girls twist their bodies into impossible shapes and keep on fucking. You have to admire them for endurance and enthusiasm.
-The models are mainly A-list models. You've seen them at many different porn sites, if you're familiar with teen porn sites. Gina Gerson, Riley Star, Alexis Crystal, Sarah Kay, Piper Perri. Some of them are also featured at softcore photo sites like MetArt. Maybe it's psychology, but seeing them at MetArt and then at hardcore sites gives you a different perspective on these models.
-Easy navigation. Hot links to switch between the available sites.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
-Your choice for streaming and/or downloads definitions from 270p through 1080p.
-Zip file for photo sets and screen caps.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
The photos were shot by a professional photographer: nicely focused, nicely centered, well lit, crystal clear images. The photo sets for a video are worth collecting.
-Exclusive content.
CONS(START OF):
-The main con is this is an archive site. Last update was Sep 8, 2019. But even before then, updates were very spotty, going for months between updates.
-An ads splash page when you log in. But there are some very low-priced ads shown.
-You get access to the Nubiles.net site with a membership. Nubiles.net is the star of the Nubiles Porn network, but access to Nubiles.net is not as well advertised as the rest of the Nubiles Porn sites. Be sure to visit the Nubiles.net site, to see what the site has to offer. I think Nubiles.net, by itself, is worth the subscription price for the entire network. This con is that the Nubiles.net site is not clearly shown to be part of the network access.
-Small site. 39 videos total. Plus a photo set and a screen shot set.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
I don't know why there is a screen shot set, since the photo sets are excellently shot, with over 100 photos per set. If you have a fine photo set, what purpose does the screen cap set of the same video serve?
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Although this is hardcore, it's like a David Hamilton film with a harder edge: the set is a large room with a barre and the model and a stunt cock.
The plot is simple: an attractive young girl is practicing ballet, the stunt cock appears, he might help her with her practice for a few moments, but then they quickly get down and dirty. Except it's not dirty sex, but clean sex. The image of the young girl, often with her hair tied back in a bun. Wearing a see-through dance costume, simple yet showcasing the petite body.
Piper Perri, one of the featured models, has such a sweet little ass, seduces Skye West, and then Ryan Driler, the stunt cock, joins the fun. It's slow and sensual, and all 3 performers do a fine job.
The photography is crystal clear, the images focused and well lit, the technical features are excellent.
The simple, mainly empty room highlights the action: no distracting furniture to get in the way of your viewing. You have the ballet barre, the models, and that's it: Simple yet effective. The yummy female flesh is on view. Some of the models are fucking attractive, to put it mildly.
As I said, it's a small site. I have no idea why they didn't continue making more content for the site.
The site theme is simple. The production costs should be low, because the set is a large, empty room, simple costumes, the site theme is visual and easily captured. I think the producers of the network are idiots, because I really enjoy this site, versus the sites with lame plots that tax the models with limited acting skills and stupid dialog. Maybe the producers think the sites with lame plots and poor acting are funny, and they get a chuckle out of making stupid faux incest videos?
What I mean is, with such a clear, uncluttered scene, you can focus on the bodies of these cute young teens, and the camera does a fine job showcasing their tender young flesh.
Giving the site a score of 85. It's a small site. The theme is simple and easily filmed, and the videos (and photo sets) are excellent teen porn. Much more enjoyable than many of the videos at other sites in the network. I think they made a mistake by not updating the site.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some of the cutest, tiniest models in porn.
- Good update schedule with a new scene every week.
- Each scene comes with a video and photo set (see cons)
- Big site for a premium standalone with 384 scenes as of 9/8/2021
- Technical quality will surprise you even on the oldest of those 384 scenes.
- A video format I really like 720p in 7000 bitrate
- Download speeds are good with a few slower speeds on a few videos (maybe glitches or weather in this area)
Cons:
- Upgrades are the only thing that outnumber the number of sexual positions you will see. I believe they would charge for the ability to rate the scene if they could figure out how to.
- If you join this site it is all you get unless you are willing to upgrade. It is a worthy join as a standalone if you’re into the petite models but may not be enough for some.
- Newer scenes have no download options on screencaps or photos.
Bottom Line:
The number of scenes on this site and update rate is impressive. A lot of these standalone premium sites do not have a lot of scenes or updates but this one is nearing 400 scenes and they update weekly. There is the annoyance factor of the upsells. Here’s a hint, even if you upgrade, they replace that upsell offer with a second, new upgrade option. It’s like the anus, it never ends. I think I made more funnies on that comment than most of my reviews. That was a double-dipper.
The models, if you like petite models are some of the best I’ve seen in this niche. As a big man myself, I can tell you they cast well, like putting 6’6” men in the scene. They are going to convince you she is a tiny model. I don’t know, would that qualify as production quality? It’s a smart move. If you want the upgrades you will get a lot more content and a lighter wallet but I do think the first upgrade package is worth it. Anything beyond that is something I’m not willing to do.
As a standalone, you can see the number of scenes is more than enough to warrant joining this site by itself. It’s really nice to see that new update every week. I’m guessing they have an automated updater and no I’m not paying extra if I just told your secret. They are like clockwork on this site. That is going to be a complaint for some too. The scenes are not that different from one another and you’re more likely to get a story out of my review than one of the scenes. Some of these models are worth joining just for their content. Where I don’t join a lot of different sites these days, I am new to Clary Trinity and what a future (if not already) star she is going to be. I have a good record when it comes to predicting future stardom (Eve Angel when she was Eva Shine with way too much body hair, Jynx Maze before anyone knew who she was and it was nomination here on PU for a then unknown Veronica Rodriguez as the top new model about 10 years ago). I see that with this Clary Trinity though I would change her name to Trinity Clarity. Have her agent call me about that.
You’re going to get very high technical quality on this site. All 384 scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p (two options), 480p (two options) and the downloads are unlimited. I do not download 4K. I tried it, my vision isn’t getting any better so there’s no reason for my porn quality to either. The interesting download feature this site does have is a 720p 7000 bitrate download. Those are crystal clear to my eyes.
There is a problem if you like pictures. There are no photosets. They have screencaps but no downloadable zip. This is strictly a video site. That is a change they made. A lot of the older scenes have pictures and screencaps with the pictures being downloadable in a zip. That’s way too 2021 for my tastes. Don’t believe that nonsense about we need to regress to see progress. It’s one of the only sites I have ever joined that the older content has more options than the newer content. Having said that, their pictures are underwhelming and that’s probably why they’re underwhelming. They want to show you how bad they are at taking pictures so you don’t miss them. It is really a shame, all kidding aside, they have one of the best collections of petite models I have seen and pictures, at least for me, would add a lot.
As a standalone this site is worth the $18 price as a premium standalone and if you do the upgrade this site is one their best in the entire expensive package.
(added after reading Pink Panther's review)
I don't have any other petite site memberships so didn't know this site is using licensed content from another petite site. I am not going to lower the score for that since I don't have the other site's membership and therefore, this is all new to me and new updates.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Petite models in hardcore male/female and lesbian scenes.
221 scenes with downloadable videos and photos.
All content is high quality with up to 1080p offered on all videos.
Joining and canceling is easy with CCBill.
Navigation is simple, but not without problems.
Cons:
Being a petite woman, I enjoy the petite niche in porn, but the problems I mentioned in the pros is starting to make this site confusing.
Advertisements that aren’t terribly obtrusive, but are still there.
Updates come, but with the aforementioned confusion it can make the updates confusing.
Bottom Line:
This site has several positives going for it. The models are cute and pretty. The lesbian scenes are pretty good. The male/female scenes are hit or miss. The video quality is a plus unless you want 4K. The photo sets are very good and can be downloaded in zips. There is one problem that showed up over the last few months. They (Petite HD Porn) decided to number their scenes as seasons and episodes, similar to a television show. One scene will be S(season): 20, E(pisode): 4, the next release S20, E5. It always seems like a good idea until this happens. Of the newest 5 releases, two are listed as “New Season”. One is S22 E1 (sounds like a new season). The other, that is more recently released is S2 E1. And it’s listed as a new season just like season 22 is listed as a new season. Is the content being recycled? The 3 newest updates include two from season 2. This group of sites is not known for this kind of sloppiness.
The site is still a good site. Some of the male/female seasons are very good, as good as you will see on more known hardcore sites. The pretty models are usually into the sex, but if you’re here for a story there’s not much going on there. Why name the scenes, give them seasons and episodes then leave the story off?
There are 221 scenes, the updates are not even close to consistent. Currently, there was an update last on June 24, then June 21, before that was May 16, before that was March 14 and before that one -- February 9th. The last time I was a member here they were updating once a week during the peak of Covid. It’s one of those sites that you may enjoy, but you’re not going to be missing anything by skipping it. It does carry over the feeling that Nubiles tried too hard to do too much with a network to couple with Nubiles.net (which wasn’t needed) and then the premium standalone sites and a second network. The video quality is good with up to 1080p downloads. The photos and downloadable zips are there. It comes with a 15 or 16 site network, I really believe that’s an 18 site network, but I can’t remember the names of the other sites they don’t list. It’s at least cheap and uses CCBill for easy cancellation. The cross-sales when I joined were not checked.
It just feels like they could do a lot more with this site and their entire group of sites and networks and they may be as long as you join all the sites separately and pay a separate price for each. Just by itself, I couldn’t recommend this site, as a part of the Nubiles Porn network it’s worth taking a look at it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good update rate: they add a new photoset or video every day or every other day.
-Video and photoset quality is outstanding.
-The selection of models is very good. I would rate the Metart, MetartX, Love Hairy (all part of the Metart network) as more attractive, but I doubt any PU member would kick any of these girls out of his or her bed.
-In the last few years, the site has focused on two girls getting it on,
or solo masturbation. The girls (late teens, twenties) are attractive, but I would rate Love Hairy and MetartX models slightly above the VivThomas models. Let me explain: how a model is photographed can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears. Also, you have more control over a model's appearance in a photograph than in a video, more control over the lighting, use of cosmetics, photoshopping, etc. And in my opinion, even if the same model appears at all 3 sites, her appearance at Love Hairy and MetartX is usually better than her appearance at Viv Thomas.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
They say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder: but the photographer can make a huge difference in a model's appearance: with lighting, setting, cosmetics, photoshopping, etc.
One of the finest sites for making a model appear glamourous is The White Boxxx, which makes an art of making attractive models appear like movie stars, even when they are doing hardcore sex.
-Content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
CONS(START OF):
-Viv Thomas is an excellent site. The cons are minor.
Navigation is easy. The content (films and galleries) have extensive tags that make finding the content that appeals to your tastes easy. The model index is good: oversized headshots of the models. But even though these are attractive to beautiful women, the headshots often don't emphasize their beauty. The staff, or whoever is responsible to making these headshots, need to re-photograph the model's headshots to show how lovely they can be.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
They need to sell the beauty of the models. Appearance or presentation is vitally important in a glamour site.
-Viv Thomas is a stand-alone site. It's part of the Metart network, but membership in Viv Thomas does not give you access to any other site in the Metart network.
-You do get access to the Metart live cam shows, but that that's standard with any Metart network site. And they really push the live cam shows, with ads on every member page.
-Like many or most Metart network sites, you can buy individual photosets and videos, even if you're not a member. But the prices are not cheap. A better way to download the photosets and videos is to join for a month: much cheaper, especially if you want to download more than a few sets.
-They advertise daily updates. But the update rate is really every 1 or 2 days.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Number of films: 2,123
Number of galleries: 3,322
Number of models: 1,095
Number of contributing photographers: 36
Most of the models are attractive, and many are familiar from other sites in the Metart network.
-Viv Thomas was started by Viv Thomas around 2000, so it been around over 20 years now.
The Metart people took over the site in 2014. Domai, which started around 1997, used a simpler style of female solo nudity. And then Goddess Nudes was started by the same founder of DOMAI a few years later, to create a slightly edgier site. DOMAI and Goddess Nudes were added to the Metart network when the founder's age made running the sites increasingly difficult.
All 3 sites were famous for the quality of the content. Although the Viv Thomas site was much more sexual, with solo, lesbian, and boy-girl content. DOMAI and Goddess Nudes were mainly simple solo female model sets.
Once Metart took over the sites, they slowly changed the site structures into the Metart network style, to make navigation easier and to add the frills that the Metart network sites are known for.
Photosets are available for streaming and downloading in 3 definitions.
You can control how the photosets are displayed on your monitor: resolution, number of thumbnails displayed per page, slideshow interval time, whether comments are displayed or hidden, sort order for films and galleries, etc.
You also get the standard blog for the Metart network, tailored to the Viv Thomas site.
Large, well-photographed photos of one or two lovely models, with a link to a short erotic fiction based on the gallery or film displayed.
Viv Thomas is basically a fine site: easy to use, good customer support (but telephone and live chat service would be faster than email support), good erotic content for solo masturbation and two-girl lesbian sex.
I'm giving the site a score of 91. It's an excellent site, and PU has a discounted membership price of $20/month. Or $100/year, if you're into lesbian sex.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is another site in the Porn Pros-related network, this one not surprisingly, focused on petite girls getting fucked, and there are a lot of cute petite girls here. They currently have 355 scenes. Recent scenes have featured cuties such as Jasmine Grey, Vina Sky & Jane Wilde. The scenes that are done by Tiny4K themselves are really pretty great - beautifully filmed with some fun tease & solo stuff before the boy/girl stuff begins. They know how to make the girls look good & have a mix of pov & distance shots to show the girls off to their best advantage. Those scenes are offered in 5 download options ranging from 480 p to 4K. They have both photo sets and screenshots available for each of those scenes, but only the photo sets are downloadable as a zip. Both screenshots & photos can be scrolled through on the site. Members can comment on the scenes & check out what other members thought as well. Current updates are once a week. Photos download at 1500 x 1000
Cons:
A lot of recent updates here are licensed from Team Skeet & Exxxtra Small so if you have a membership to Team Skeet, there's currently a lot less reason to join this site. As with all sites in this network, the performer search function is the worst. I'm looking at a Jane Wilde scene uploaded on January 21. If I click on "Girls" and "j", Jane Wilde is nowhere to be seen. If I pick out Jane Wilde from the "All Girls" there is 1 Tiny4K scene shown, but it's not the 1 that was uploaded on January 21. There is truly no way to get a complete picture of what performers are on this site without scrolling through 29+ pages of updates. They make a big deal of promoting the network, but you have to be careful when doing so because a) the charge to upgrade to the network is a one-time charge but you will only continue to have access so long as you continue to pay monthly on the site that you upgraded from, so be sure that you got a good enough deal that you'll want to maintain membership.
Bottom Line:
b) make very sure that you know exactly what you're going to be getting as part of your upgrade. Get it in writing, if possible because you won't necessarily get every related site as part of the upgrade, and be aware that if they add new sites, you won't have access to those new sites from your upgrade.
In the era of COVID-19, this is another site that is challenged to provide the quality of updates that they were doing in the pre-COVID era. On the one hand, it's cool that they are making sure that members get something, but on the other hand, licensed material from another petite-girl site that you might have already had a membership to is not a great reason to join this site. At this point, I'll rate this site as 70. If they get back to a good rate of updates in the post-COVID era with their former high quality updates and really cute girls, I'd rate it a good bit higher.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubliles Porn network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you full access to the entire network of 16 different sites.
-No download limits, no streaming limits. Many sites are starting to limit downloads, or starting to charge extra for downloads, so unlimited downloads for no extra charge is getting to be a nice feature.
-login and member pages are https, which means the pages are secure, less prone to hacking.
-Easy navigation of the site. Easy to switch between sites.
-A major strength of the site (and network) is how attractive these young teens are. Many teen sites have lots of attractive to gorgeous models, so this site and network don't stand out for the quality of the models, but you have to give the site and network credit for picking such attractive models.
-CCBill and Epoch are the primary billers, so they are trusted names, easy to cancel, easy to deal with.
-The site has 202 videos with matching photo sets on 2020-06-13.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The videos average 15 to 25 minutes, which is shorter than most teen hardcore sites, but the videos cover all the action needed for a hardcore porn scene.
-You can control the streaming speed of the video: from 0.25X to 2.0X.
-Can select the streaming definition from 270p through 1080p.
-Video download definition choice from 270p through 1080p.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor. One of the better teen networks.
-Slow update rate. Recent updates are 1 video (and matching photo set) per month. But with the coronavirus epidemic, you take what you can get, and try to be thankful.
-The thumbnail that illustrates the model in the video is small. Would be nice to have a larger thumbnail, so you can get a better idea of what the model looks like.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The regular 1-year membership is $199. Wait for a holiday special (lots of them each year) and you should be able to join for $100 or less.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: petite teens having sex: female masturbation, lesbian sex, boy-girl sex, 2 boys-1 girl, 2 girls-1 boy.
The girls are real teens, small, cute to lovely. They put on a good show while demonstrating their appetite for sexual satisfaction.
This would be considered reality porn: it's not glamour porn, the girls are not put into glamourous settings or glamorous costumes, but they are young and attractive, and eager for sex. The sets and costumes are not glamourous, but they aren't the cheap low-rent settings and costumes of porn from 2000 or earlier that many Russian sites started out with.
The mood of the lesbian videos can be slow and sensous. It's not really seduction, more like two girls expoloring each other's bodies in a friendly, loving way.
The moods of the videos varies. It can be slow and senuous, or perky and fun, or whatever.
Since the girls are young, petite, and mainly attractive, you're just supposed to relax and enjoy these videos (and photo sets).
Most porn models are not great actors. So when you see some of them trying to do the perky teen bit, it can seem false. Dakota Fanning, not a porn model but a fine actress, when she was a pre-teen, did lots of interviews for her movies, and she came across as a cute, wonderful girl with lots of energy and enthusiasm and intelligence. And it seemed real. Watching a porn model trying to project the same bubbly image, it just seems fake. I'd much rather watch a Dakota Fanning movie made years ago than watch a blonde porn model smiling and twirling and shaking her ass and waving her arms because she's so full of fake enthusiasm and happiness for life.
Kiara Cole, fine petite teen body, shitty actress. They should write a script for her that doesn't require much acting. And less fake smiling. Along with her false eyelashes. Why do so many porn models wear false eyelashes? Less moans and groans and fake screams would make the video seem more real.
You have access to the entire Nubiles Porn network of 16 sites. All the sites are teen-centric, and almost all the teen models are attractive to cute. But the site themes and plots are paper-thin.
So turn your brain off a little, to enjoy these lovely girls.
Some of the videos are crystal clear, and watching the fine bodies of these teens can be an enjoyable experience.
I'm giving the site a score of 93, because you not only have access to a site of 202 teen videos, but access to 15 other teen sites.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The site is part of the nubiles-porn network, so you get access to the entire nubiles-porn network.
-PU has a discounted price of $14.98/month recurring.
-I really enjoy the on-screen photo viewer. It's easy to use, and you can control the speed the images remain.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Exclusive content.
-The site watermark is small and located at the bottom right corner of each photo, so it's out of the way.
-The models are young, attractive, slender teens, and the stunt cocks look like they could be real ballet dancers, adding to the fantasy. There isn't much of a plot or build-up: the female model is dressed as a ballerina, doing a few moves by a barre (the stationary handrail that ballet dancers use). The male dancer shows up, they might kiss or hold or touch each other, then they have sex. But the set is clean, the costumes simple dance outfits, the colors are strong and real, the technical features (focus, lighting, sound, etc) is very good.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Photosets average over 100 photos per set. These are good quality photos. Much better than screencaps.
And since the models are attractive, the photosets are worth keeping.
The photosets come in multiple definitios for download in a zip file:
1200x800px, 2000x1334px, 7952x5304px.
The videos come in multiple definitions for streaming and download:
270p up to 1080p.
CONS(START OF):
-Small site. Only 39 episodes.
-Archive site. Or you could say it's a site with a very erratic, slow, update rate.
-This is not a con against the site, but both the PU site and The Best Porn site say the one year membership is free.
That seems to be a mistake.
On The Best Porn site there is the notice:
"Simply enter the site (this link or any on this page) and look for the lower price on the credit card billing page."
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
I click on the link at The Best Porn, hit the join link at Petite Ballerinas Fucked, and see a price of $99.95/year, recurring. That is a sale price, but it's not free.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site (also called a series by nubiles-porn) was started in 2015-09-02.
The site only has 39 episodes, so it's a tiny site.
The update rate is very erratic: sometimes there is one video added in a month, then months go by with no new videos. The last video was added 2019-09-08, so you could consider this an archive site, or a site with an amazingly slow update rate.
That is a shame, because the quality of the videos is excellent: The models are petite (tiny) girls who are dressed in ballerina costumes. A stunt cock comes along, in theory the girl's dancing partner, and they have sex. The visuals are outstanding: clear, crisp visuals for the video. The girls are white, slender, young.
Not too much make-up, but they are just luscious. Maybe not the right word: striking and adorable and eminently fuckable is a better way to describe the models. (Pardon the French, LOL).
The sex is not harsh: it's more like a girl and a guy with strong sexual drives getting off together: not love, just sex.
What makes it memorable is the girl is slender, white, young, attractive, and she's dressed in a ballerina costume. Doing some dance exercises. Then the male dancer appears (he looks like he could be a real dancer).
So there's a small element of realism to the video. And the couple is clean. And attractive. And the sex is good. Not great. There's no harshness or violence or cruelty to the sex:
It's an interesting site. A niche site, because the theme is slender white ballerinas who are having sex with their dance partner.
But since the site is so small (only 39 episodes), you'll be able to download the entire site, or what you want to keep, very easily. And in a short time.
And since there are little to no updates, you will then move on to the rest of the network, which thankfully has enough material to keep you occupied for a good while.
There are 17 sites (or series) in the network.
Covering different niches.
Scoring the site is not easy:
Because the site is so small (39 episodes, remember), and there are few if any updates, those are large negatives.
However, the videos and photosets are first rate, technically.
And the girls are slender white teens who are very attractive. I say teens, they look like teens, but some could be in their early twenties.
So if that's the kind of model you like, the score goes up.
And with network access, the score goes up even more. The nubiles-porn network is an excellent network.
So I'm giving the site a score of 88. That is very subjective.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Cute, petite models, most look barely legal.
310 current scenes.
Downloads for videos and photo zips are available. Each scene has both.
One new scene per week.
Biller is Epoch.
Videos average 30 minutes each.
Cons:
Is close to cookie cutter gonzo porn. The only unique feature is the size and cuteness of the models.
Not enough threesomes or more.
Bottom Line:
This site has some of the cutest, youngest looking models available. The clothing choices also makes them look and seem younger with skirt rompers, some pigtails and this is all accentuated by most of the males being tall and with large penises.
The scenes could have more story to them, but it seems like the whole site is just based on these small models trying to take on a bigger guy. The site has been around long enough to have 310 scenes. The videos are excellent quality and can be downloaded or streamed. The downloads top out at 1080p. The videos are crisp and clear, but they are large files on the 1080p ones. If you’re strapped for hard drive space you could always download the 720p, 576p or 480p versions. The 1080p ones can be as large as 3-4GB.
The models are the main attraction. Most of them are pros, but they are newer to the business or were newer when they filmed their scenes here. A good example of how they use the male model to make the female look smaller is a scene with Michael Swayze with Amber Summers. Michael Swayze is listed as 6’5”, Amber Summers is 5’1”. I just wish they would add a little more to it than the obvious size difference. A few scenes are more creative including one with the tiny woman hiding on top of a refrigerator, tucked under cabinets.
There is good diversity in the models, but we are talking about diversity in an age group/generation where mixed race is nearly the majority. A few scenes are called interracial, but the male and female both look white to me.
It’s a very good site if you like seeing smaller women having sex. And don’t mind the outfits they show up in being cliché like Girl Scouts, cheerleaders and plaid skirts with argyle socks.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- All petite models, 5'4" and under while weighing 110 pounds or less.
- Still updates daily but the updates are slower than the other ATK sites. Six photo sets and four videos over the last 7 days.
- Nearly all of the models are attractive and they have most of the well-known smaller models here as well as amateurs.
- I'm back to preferring photos, over 31,000 photo sets and 10,000 videos, all are downloadable and there are no limits.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of max)
- If there's enough sites in the network to your interest, it's a pretty good deal as they've added ATK Girlfriends to the network. I think ATK Girlfriends probably takes away some of the newer content from ATK Petites.
Cons:
- I had wondered if the advanced search had been switched but it's not on here. It has me searching ATK Galleria, which is a completely different site. Back to the model list and finding the models you like.
- I also can't get the tags to work with any kind of accuracy.
Bottom Line:
This site has always appealed to me. Not only are the models petite, they are usually sporty/fit built and that's a favorite of mine. I've seen the newer stars here like Allie Addison with 19 photo sets and 5 videos and Vina Sky with 37 photo sets and 11 videos. There's a lot of the models that look like amateurs and you will find more Asian models here, including some favorites from ATK Exotics (new sets here, not shared).
I think the first porn that was filmed was most likely of a petite model. They seem to be naturals at porn. They're more flexible (probably gymnastics background), they look tiny next to most men and the ones at least on here are cute and giggly.
I haven't seen many lollipops. That's an old PU joke.
The photo sets here show ATK's strength. A nice 100-150 photo set of a cute, pretty, down to earth dressed and make-up, girl next door. They take their time in getting her naked and you get to see every step up of it. It's almost like taking screenshots from a video. There's not too many pictures but almost always seems like just the right amount. You'll see every part of the model even the shy ones.
The videos here are good but there's nothing really exciting about them. The pros are better which isn't really better since you can see them masturbating and having sex on other sites. Vina Sky's videos for all the ATK sites combined became instant download, stashed in a folder. She doesn't seem to have a bad performance in her. The model I compare her to a lot, Veronica Rodriguez also has some really great content on here. Isn't it funny, I probably wouldn't be that attracted to either of them in real life as I'm not usually attracted to slender women.
What looks to be standard now for all ATK sites, 3000x2000 on the high quality photo set downloads, 1080p, 480p and mobile on the videos. The videos are mostly masturbation/tease and I think it's really more about if you're in the mood for that. There are plenty of good solo models on here.
Despite the lesser amount of updates, Petites gets a slight boost in score from the subjective side as these are some of my favorite models, especially in the current models. Adding in the large amount of Asian models, it makes it one of my favorite ATK sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Gorgeous European models in solo and lesbian scenes.
Video updates 2-3 times per week and has 1,965 videos on it.
Photos update every 5 days and there are 3,208 photo sets.
Photo sets and videos are downloadable and there are no download restrictions.
Very easy to use site with sections/tabs for videos, photos, models.
There are 1,042 models and they include most of the biggest European stars of all-time.
Cons:
While easy to use, there could be a better tagging system (there is not one) and a better way to separate solo/lesbian (there is not one).
Too many behind the scenes videos. In recent months, they have averaged 2 BTS videos for every 3 sex videos.
There used to be hardcore scenes on here, but I haven't found any.
Bottom Line:
The content here is as hot as I've found when talking about lesbian porn. There is more kissing, more touching, more of everything considered foreplay than on most lesbian sites. There could be a question if this should be listed as a lesbian site as there are solo scenes (mostly in the past). The newer content is almost exclusively lesbian.
My favorite part of Viv Thomas at the current time is the return of some of the models that were around when I first started watching porn online (around 2006). Sandra Shine is producing some of the scenes and recently had a cameo in a scene with the very featured Liv Revamped. Blue Angel has also been in recent scenes. It's fun for me since I'm similar age to those two and remember watching their scenes over a decade ago. There are even cameos by Eve Angel and Viv Thomas.
The sex features some of the best camerawork as you can clearly see the tongues licking and sucking on clits, nipples, and twirling in each other's mouth. I feel like I've been missing out on this content. I had forgot about this site.
The navigation is very easy to use, but it doesn't give you any filtering/sorting options by category. The only sorting options are top rated, 4K, most viewed and most favorited. You have to scroll through to find solo for example. A filter to remove behind the scenes videos would be a good start too.
The video quality is excellent with 4K being available on the last 2 years (consistently) and up to 5 years (some scenes have 4K some don't), there's 720p and 1080p back until 2009. Which is a con I'm going to mention, but didn't list. In the scenes/videos section they only show videos back to 2014. Anything before then, you have to find them by going to the model's page and pulling them up from there. This is concerning for me since I don't know if the video count includes all the ones not listed in the scenes/videos or if it does.
That is my only major deduction from the site's score. I think it would be difficult for a person new to the site to find what they're looking for and as mentioned earlier, the hardcore scenes seem to be gone.
Looking beyond that if you like lesbian, panties, women kissing, women having passionate (looks rough in lesbian porn) sex with each other this is one of the best sites for it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ All good looking teen models
+ Fast server (almost always)
+ Video files @ MP4: 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and WMV 720
+ Screencaps to preview the videos
+ A Facebook-like emoticon system for rating the scenes
+ User comments with up and down voting on the comment
+ Zip files for pictures
+ PU discount (also available from the site itself at time of sign up)
+ Multi month and year subscriptions available (But see bottom line)
Cons:
- Upsells EVERYWHERE
- Only updates 2 or 3 times a week
- Videos are all labeled file type and resolution e.g. mp4_2160 and wmv_720
- Picture zip files are all labeled Gallery
- Noticed that not all models are found in alphabetical search
- Smallish amount of content
- Pretty much formulaic content
- Random dropouts in download speed.
Bottom Line:
Welcome to Upsell City! Go to login and you're greeted with an offer to upgrade to open all their sites for $69.95 a month. Click past that and you're on the site you signed up for, headed by a list of their sites with icons as a reminder that you've only opened one site. AND, of course, there's a button to, once again, direct you to upgrade to open all of the sites. Above the video is an offer to check out webcams. (Yeah - those are always free) Ignore all of that, click on a video and you see at the bottom of the page every scene that model has done for the other sites. I guess $70 is a good deal for access to 12 more sites, but you'd have to have a lot of time - and hard drive space - open to download enough to make it worth the money. I can certainly understand hyping your product, trying to draw in customers. What I don't like is paying for something and still getting the high pressure sales pitch. It's distracting, annoying and unnecessary.
Anyway... on to the content. With the advent of reasonably priced 10 and 12 terabyte drives, I don't shy away from huge files and only download the 4K video, so that's all I can comment on. The site is only 5 years old so all videos are available in 4K - a big plus. The files average around 5 or 6 gigs and, for the most part, look as clean as should be expected considering the file sizes. There are some camera shaking and focus issues here and there, but nothing too frequent to diminish the overall experience. Due to their updating only twice a week, there's just short of 300 videos in just over 5 years online at the time of this review. So, if you're like me, you'll figure that signing up for multi-month isn't really the smart option. This is my second time on the site and I think once a year with the PU discount is the smart choice.
If the girls weren't so good looking, the going-through-the-positions scenes would probably get old. To me, the girls are hot enough to overshadow the routines. There are some variances here and there... outdoor shoots... bathroom shoots, but most just wind up on a couch or a bed and going through the aforementioned positions, usually ending in a facial with a creampie or two (some obviously fake). I do like the fact that the focus is mostly on the model and not the stunt cock, with a good bit of POV angles in pretty much every scene.
The download speeds here are typically 12 m/s, a tad higher than just about every other site I've joined. But, for some reason, once in a while I'd get one creeping along at >750 kb/s. Cancel the download, wait a few minutes, restart it and it's back to full speed. That leads me to believe that it's not a hidden bandwidth limit as I first suspected.
I'm pretty anal when it comes to file organization, so having to rename every file wasn't too much of a bother. I'm used to having to remove underscores, change capitalization and the like, but mp4_4K for every video? Kind of ridiculous. I sometimes wonder if sites don't do stuff like that to reduce a member's time downloading to save bandwidth. Seems plausible, but who knows?
I'm not a picture person but to do this review, I checked out a few. They're clear enough, not overly repetitive, but at 1500 pixels on the long side, I'd say they're behind the times in the photo department. The photo sets don't seem to follow the associated video either. Picture people would probably be disappointed on this site..
All in all, not a bad site at all for teen aficionados. On an otherwise top notch site, I've scored it an 80, mostly on the strength of the available content, but marred by the somewhat smallish collection and the upsells that are in your face everywhere. If they'd do away with the pervasive upsells, go to more frequent updates (at least 5 a week?) and take the time to better label the files, this would be a damn near perfect site. As it is, I'll go back again some time in the future, but it'll be a while.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Archive of 280 videos, 323 models
-Updates once a week
-nice ethnic mix of models
-Great selection of beautiful teens
-I have access to 28 sites in the Team Skeet network
-The members’ pages are secure (https)
-No broken links
-No download limits
-Nice discount through Pornusers
Cons:
-Prechecked cross sell on signup page
-Much advertising on the members pages, very cluttered
-Annoying captcha on log in
-The biller is Epoch
Bottom Line:
The Team Skeet network has gotten ratings of 90.5 from The Best Porn, 95 from Rabbits Reviews and on Pornusers Exotics gave it 80. I would be closer to Exotics score as the network has some flaws that I feel are worth deducting for.
EXXXTRASMALL has been rated at 82.5 by The Best Porn and 86 by Rabbits Reviews. On Pornusers lk2fireone gave it a 75. His major gripes were that the site was not secure, now not a problem, and there were slow download speeds, also corrected.
The site focuses on small, petite women paired with larger men. Team Skeet has this as the number two rated site of their 28. The American models are all very young and mostly quite cute. That seems to be the right word considering their age and size. Mostly they were fresh talent that I have not seen before and there is a nice ethnic mix. I especially liked the scenes with Maya Bijou wearing a hijab, Luna Bright looking fresh and natural , Exxxtra cute Latina Liv Revamped having at it with four black men who were twice her size and Angel Smalls starring in three excellent scenes.
The videos are premise driven or even have a little storyline as the scenes start. There are numerous scenes with more than one female or more than one male model. The performances are pretty good, as are the production values. This network focuses on young models, so they have a lot of experience showcasing them.
I did not see any anal, or any scenes that could remotely be considered extreme. This is typical of any Teen Skeet site. The focus is on oral and vaginal. Updates are once a week and the archive has 280 videos, every one of them in HD. They use a tag system for searching, making it easy to find a star or type of content that you like. If they had anal, I would say they were almost perfect. I hate logging in using captchas, but did not find the usual hassle of logging in multiple times to get in. There are no download limits so you can go whole hog when downloading. There is so much quality on Team Skeet that you may want to download quite a bit.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very high quality material, often outstanding.
Beautiful, natural models
Some Met Art models but mostly unique models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Part of the Met Art network but a separate site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Excellent G/G videos
Fast download speeds
Excellent site layout
Navigation is identical to Met Art (Excellent)
Met-Art single sign-on means you can get here from there without having to log in. Met Art network support is outstanding.
Cons:
Nothing major to list here.
Perhaps a few of the newer solo sets are a little soft in comparison. (Mostly new models)
Bottom Line:
Viv Thomas is primarily a lesbian site with a mix of about 80% lesbian sets and 20% solo sets within the more recent sets. Older sites include solo, boy/girl, some insertion, and lesbian. It became part of the Met Art network several years ago and Met Art has done a really good job of keeping it up.
For perspective, ALS scan is the other lesbian site in the MA network. The girls there are very young, very petite, carefree, happy to experiment and generally give off an almost childish vibe. Viv Thomas, on the other hand, is pretty much exactly what you expect from Met Art in a lesbian site. The women are much more refined, truly beautiful most of the time, and most of the videos and image sets are damn near perfect.
Stats (as of 1/20/2019. These are published on the site):
About 3125 photo sets
About 1881 videos
About 1142 models
4-5 updates a week
Sets are avalable all the way back to 2002!
All sets are dated.
All sets are scored.
Newer images and zips come in 3 sizes up to 3000x4500.
Videos come in multiple sizes and formats.
I haven't been a member of this site since Met Art took it over and I'm happy to say that although the overall feel has changed a little, the material puts this site up there toward the top of the Met Art stable.
Viv Thomas, now semi-retired, is an outstanding photographer and videographer who has produced a lot of award winning material for magazines, video production companies and on-line. His older stuff on this site is top quality for the time-frame and the models, damn near all of them, all the way back to 2002, are stunning and not at all shy. I'd say the older stuff parallels Twisty's or Danni's best from the period and the newer stuff is similar to MetArt-X in terms of showy photography. Nearly every solo set has spreading at least and every lesbian set portrays what I imagine is pretty genuine lesbian sex (i.e. these girls are not just standing together in the set, their fingers and tongues are inside each other.) The older sets include some world-class famous models like Sophie Moon, Veronica Zemanova and my all time favorite Marketa Belonoha. Newer sets include a lot of really popular MA models like Niemira and many beautiful models I don't see elsewhere on the MA network. What puts these sets apart from many others is that the early models like Veronica and Marketa are doing things like spreading that they never did in later shoots. And the later shoots are slightly different than what you would find on other MA sites. Make-up for example, makes some of the models like Niemira a little more alluring. Reall ynice job on all of this.
All of the videos on this site since about 2010 are at least 720P. Prior to that, they are 420p. Newer videos go up to 4k.
Navigation on the site is an exact copy of the main Met Art site with many user-adjustable options. Default image sizes, images opening in the same or a different tab, etc. I am very used to the MA navigation and may be a little biased, but I truly believe it is the best navigation system on the internet.
Met Art uses a single-sign on to their sites. Once you sign into a new site under it, you no longer have to log into that site individually. To facilitate this, there is a navigation pull-down that can get you to any of the sites in the network. There is also a "status" page that allows you to see all of your subscription details and you can even sign up for or cancel subscriptions right from this pull-down. This is a very nice solution to an often vexing problem.
OK, bottom line. Even if you are not a fan of lesbian porn, there is a LOT of excellent solo image material here dating back nearly TWO DECADES that you might like a lot. That includes nearly every big model name in porn photography over the last 18 years. The videos since about 2010 are also very diverse and mostly excellent. The only reason I won't give this a 90 or better is because they don't do daily updates, but given the inredible amount of material here, you could spend many, many hours looking through the old stuff on the days there are no new updates.
Look around for discount offers, but be aware that there are sometimes issues with the Met Art single sign-on when you try to sign up for offers made outside the network. If you find a low-price offer but the site doesn't list it because you already have an account within the Met Art network, contact support and they will work it out for you.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Summary of review (for those who don't want to spend a lot of time getting the details:
Pros: Hot!
Cons: Some.
Bottom line: Not the best site ever, but definitely worth a join.
Pros (continued):
-Joining PetiteHDPorn gives you access to the Nubiles Porn network.
-The current price is $14.98/month, recurring at $14.98/month.
There is an option to join for $59.94 for 90 days, which works out to $19.98 per month.
So I assume the $14.98/month is a limited-time promotion offer.
-CCBill is the default billing agent. A trusted name. Easy to deal with.
-This is a hardcore teen site. The network is one of the better hardcore teen networks.
Both the site and network feature a large number of attractive teen models.
-Currently, you get 15 different sites with a membership. Which is positive. But if you try to access the different sites' content from within a single site, you only get partial access to the content from the other sites.
Most networks do a better job separating the network sites.
Cons:
Pros (continued):
-The videos and photo sets for the site and network are professionally shot.
-You can stream and/or download the videos. In your choice of low, medium or high definition.
-The photo sets can be viewed online in a slide show. Or they can be downloaded in your choice of low, medium or high definition.
Cons (start of):
-The drop-down menu is how you can navigate between sites in the network. However, there is no simple FAQ that explains the existence of the drop-down menu.
-You are assigned random login details (username and password).
-Login is done through a non-secure page.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-There is an ad for "Holiday Sale - New Site BrattySis.com!" at the top of every page in the site.
It makes you think that BrattySis is part of the Nubiles Porn network. Until you click on the ad, and find BrattySis is separate, and requires a new membership fee.
Bottom Line:
The drop-down menu is the way you get access to the different sites in your membership.
If you are not aware of the drop-down menu's existence, you will have a much harder time navigating the sites.
Some drop-down menus only show a partial list of network sites,
However, you might stumble upon an expanded drop-down member in the Nubiles-porn site, and it will list 15 sites you have access to.
This is a fucking sloppy way to give access to the different sites you are supposed to get with your membership.
Not only is the drop-down menu not made clear to members (unless someone points it out to you), but some drop-down menus only show a partial listing of the sites.
The network advertises they did a recent update of their look (around June, 2017).
What they should have included was a simple FAQ that included a brief explanation of how to use the network (via the drop-down menu).
Instead, the network designer and website manager seem to think the network structure needs no explanation.
Except:
A new member might not know about the drop-down menu, which is needed to switch between sites.
Some drop-down menus only show a partial listing of the sites you have access to.
Sloppy thinking, that new members will automatically know about the drop-down menu.
Poor execution, that has some drop-down menus only showing a partial listing of sites.
Most other networks make the drop-down menu feature much more obvious to their members.
And most of the other networks I've belonged to list all the sites in their drop-down menu.
How you access each site makes a difference in the content you have access to.
If you access a site from within Nubiles Porn, you only get limited access to the other site's content.
If you select an individual site, and enter that specific site, you then have access to all that site's content.
Most other networks do a better job separating the individual sites from each other, and making it easier to select and enter each individual site.
I'm explaining this in detail, because until PU member Loki pointed this out to me in a reply to one of my reviews, I didn't realize there was a drop-down menu to access the other sites.
The site itself does not have a simple FAQ that shows how to use the site.
And the site manager evidently does not realize this is a problem, because he knows how to use the sites, and he thinks that it's self-evident how to use the site.
If you are not aware of the drop-down menu, it makes using the different sites more difficult.
Not only is less content available to you, but the site structure is much harder to navigate, because the site becomes a jumbled mass of content.
Bottom line:
The network (Nubiles Porn) has a large amount of very attractive models.
There is a huge amount of good videos and photo sets to browse.
One site in the network, Nubiles Net, is worth the membership price, by itself.
And you get access to 14 other sites, as well.
So if your are into teen hardcore porn, the site and network is definitely a worthwhile join.
Especially with the currently reduced price of $14.98/month.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
