Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Fun blend of hardcore, lesbian and solo amateurs
Newer videos are 4K; all videos have 1080p at least
No download limits on videos or pictures
Very believable amateurs
Includes 2 good sites and 1 that’s okay
Easy to use navigation
Cons:
The sex quality is hit or miss which is common on amateur sites
Camera work is good for the most part, but does have some shaky moments
Not enough information about the scenes or the models
Bottom Line:
It’s hard to say what makes a good amateur porn scene; making it even more difficult to say what makes a good amateur porn site. For me, I don’t pay quite as much attention to the looks or attractiveness of the models. But Nebraska Coeds really has mostly attractive models. All of the strengths of a good site are present. All videos are downloadable at least in 1080p and many have 4K downloads. The pictures are high quality and also downloadable as zips. All of these downloads are unlimited.
Nebraska Coeds is the big site with over 1,500 videos and 1,100 picture sets. The scenes are also varied which isn’t that common for amateur sites. There are solo, lesbian, group and hardcore scenes. Most amateur sites just stick to one of the genres, but Nebraska Coeds gives you everything you could possibly want.
I do like this site a lot. The scenes have a real and close to natural feel to them. It’s what you would expect from a professional site or studio. It is hard to tell if the more inconsistent scenes are that way because of trying to follow a script or if it’s just they’re not that experienced.
Besides the videos being very high download quality, the pictures are 6000x4000 and come in zips for easy download and organizing. I do think that’s one of the less common features for an amateur site.
The navigation is excellent, but a common problem with amateur sites is also present – there’s not enough information about the scenes or models. It’s not that I want to get to know the models, but instead, why they are shooting porn and to show some of their personality.
The package is finished off on a positive note with CCBill being the biller. It’s very easy to cancel. I like it well enough to maybe return again, but part of that is to see if they’re really releasing new scenes or are just remastering old scenes to release as new ones. As a first-time member, the content looks new enough for me.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
4 site network of amateurs
Unbeatable quantity of this many amateurs
Over 3,000 scenes on the 4 sites combined
Professional and trustworthy billing handled by CCBill
Several new updates per week
High quality zipped pictures of amateur models you likely won’t ever see on other sites.
Cons:
Only 1 of the sites is updating
Older content takes a negative quality hit
Bottom Line:
While it’s not promoted or named as a network, this site does include 3 more sites and that helps it reach the 3,000+ scenes. The included sites are: Spring Break Life, South Beach Coeds and After Hours Exposed. That used to be a bigger deal than it is now, but for some – it could be the peace of mind leading them to join.
The other sites: Spring Break Life and South Beach Coeds are college girls in Florida. The scenes range from softcore and tease to hardcore. Those two sites are worthy sites with the two combining for nearly 1,000 scenes. After Hours Exposed is the only throwaway site with under 30 scenes and in a niche that’s not very popular.
I feel like the pictures on Nebraska Coeds deserve to be mentioned. It’s not easy to find photo sets of sexy, amateur models, but Nebraska Coeds does it. A downside is a lot of the content is categorized as softcore. There are lesbian scenes and a lot of the scenes are introducing a new model to porn. I think – in my opinion – that innocence is what makes those scenes good. For some reason, pictures just seem to be more innocent than videos, even if the photos show the same actions as the videos. The picture quality is 6000x4000 and those are downloadable. I see those specifications and know the site is trying to at least put some emphasis on their photo sets.
This package of sites is a lot like any network. There’s some good and bad. The good thing with Nebraska Coeds is the good outweighs the bad by a long distance. The models are not always knockout quality, but what group of amateur women is filled with perfect tens? How many teen women are there out there willing to take nude pictures and make videos? Not to be topped by the high picture quality, the video downloads go up to 4K.
The navigation takes a little time to get used to, but overall – it is good. There’s really not a lot to pull this site or network down. It’s pretty simple, if you like young (legal) models exposing themselves, often for the first time on camera, then this site could be your next favorite. With all these positives and the realism and authenticity, this is a solid 92.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Adult Prime network. A fine, teen-oriented network.
-They change the home page of the Adult Prime member page fairly often, so you get a current picture of the updates and live shows and whatever else is happening at the network.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. There is a captcha, but it's very easy to read.
-Videos are offered in 540p, 720p, 1080p. No 4K option.
-You get a photoset for most videos.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-The content is exclusive.
Cons:
-Tiny site. Only 46 videos. 32 photosets.
-They were updating with 2 or 3 new videos per month.
But the last updates were in November 2021. So this might be an archive site.
-Videos filmed in Australia. The Aussie accents are intriguing at first, but I would prefer American English, so I could understand the dialog easier.
-The females can have under-arm hair.
The females can have pubic hair.
Hair doesn't bother me. But it's different from the shaven look of most porn models.
Bottom Line:
The videos are a change of pace from the normal videos shown at many porn sites.
The videos are seem more amateurish.
The colors of the videos are nowhere near as life-life as the videos at the Diesel network, or the Club Sweethearts or Digital Desire sites.
The idea of the site is supposed to be Aussie girls having kinky fun.
But that's a stretch.
Maybe I'm too jaded, but to me, watching these videos is like watching home made videos of regular-looking people with a bit of sex thrown in. The sex is not kinky.
In one video, you watch 3 young women in a cabin near some woods, they go out and hang up some laundry, they take off their clothes, they talk, kiss, touch each other, lick each other's pussies.
This is the Southern Sins site version of sin: minimal lesbian sex between 3 women.
Give me the videos at the Wow sites, which seem like masterpieces of artistic vision in comparison: Not only are the girls at the Wow sites absolutely gorgeous compared to the models at Southern Sins, but the videos at the Wow sites have vivid colors for the flesh tones of the models, the clarity and crispness of the images at the Wow sites is far superior.
It's just a completely different type of offering.
Southern Sins is offering you home-style porn: the men and women in their videos are plain-style people. The quality of the videos is what you would get filming your own family at your house or at a park or on the street with amateur cameras (minus the sex, obviously).
The site is worth checking out since it's included in the Adult Prime network.
Think of the site as a slice of life site: you are watching home-style, amateur videos (and photosets) of mild sex. The sin is in the idea of sex. If you see two people kissing, that is sinful. Especially if they are both women. And if they have plastic ties or handcuffs on the women, Oh, God, that is perverted sex. No matter how mild the sex might be. Or, my gosh, what if a man and woman have sex on a blind date: how perverted and sinful.
I'm giving the site a score of 75.
I really enjoy American porn more. Or European porn. That has a more glossy feel, better scripts, more attractive models. Southern Sins gives you home-made, simple porn that is very bland.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+Good mobile device functionality.
+Straightforward navigation of scenes via paged thumbnail gallery sorted by latest or oldest release date.
+Good search facility on model name and scene name.
+Filtering of scenes by category/niche (anal, blonde, creampie etc) and year of release.
+Scene page provides complete info with links to models other scenes and linked categories/niches, as well as the usual streaming and download functionality.
+Can like/dislike a scene as well as leave comments and favourite the scene.
+Choice of streaming and download formats including 4K for all scenes.
+Good download speeds with 8MB/s on a 70Mbps broadband service, works with a DL manager.
+Includes Adultprime membership.
Cons:
-Only 27 scenes.
-No model index.
-No photosets.
-Filtering scenes by niche is hit and miss.
-Pointless "create your own clip" feature.
-Annoying slide-out ads for webcam girls.
-Download filenames aren't unique so there's a chance you might accidentally overwrite a previously downloaded scene.
-Unresponsive customer service from IMCBill.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on sign-up.
Bottom Line:
The only other Mexican hardcore site I've been a member of is Sexmex.xxx which sets a high standard, unfortunately not quite achieved by SalsaXXX. Yes, there are hot girls sucking and fucking but the action is all a bit samey and too many of the girls either have a lot of tattoos or have fake boobs and with a very limited content of 27 scenes, it doesn't stand out from the competition.
Scene duration ranges from under 10 minutes to about 30 minutes, with most scenes weighing in at 20 minutes and taking place in a car, or outdoors on the beach, the terrace or in/by the outdoor tub or swimming pool. The tub/pool scenes feature a few underwater camera angles. Generally, there's not much storyline and the hardcore action starts not long into the scene. Most of the girls are young with a variety of body types, from small breasts to large/fake and slim to curvy shape. A few of the girls don't look very latina or Mexican but the site does say that it provides hardcore sex under the Mexican sun so that allows for some tourists I guess.
Scene updates are weekly and most are straight one-on-one hardcore, with a few FFM threesomes, an MMF threesome and a lesbian scene. There are 2 scenes featuring anal, with no creampie endings, just the usual cum on face or in mouth.
Scenes can be downloaded as 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K - the download file sizes are generally reasonable for 1080p video.
The good mobile device functionality is a bonus - I make use of it to browse and favourite scenes on my smartphone, later downloading them from my favourites list to my laptop which has plenty of storage.
If this site didn't include the AdultPrime membership, it wouldn't be worth joining, the biggest letdown being the very limited content, but it does include Adult Prime so you're spoilt for choice with much more content spread across a variety of niches. Just be aware of the lack of customer service communication from IMC Bill and use PayPal to sign-up if you can.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Outdoor, group, orgy, exhibitionism, voyeurism, a little bit of everything except what you expect from regular porn.
Attractive male and female models including some well-known pornstars. The rest, I think, are amateurs with futures in porn.
Such a diverse site: Scenes in the ocean, pool, backyard, kitchen table while someone watches. Major points for switching things up.
Excellent video quality with some scenes having 4K, the rest have up to 1080p and are all downloadable.
Downloadable photo sets add a lot to the scenes with multiple people.
Very believable and realistic sex.
Cons:
Scenes are not long enough. It does look like they are going for realism with some of the guys unable to make it to 10 minutes before orgasm.
Not much story to the scenes. The length of the scenes show this. It’s like the scenes started before the filming started and the filming focuses on the sex.
Bottom Line:
The Adult Prime network was recommended to me by another Porn User member and I have to say – I’m impressed. This is one of the sites from it and it’s one of the best – though on the smaller side – sites I have been a member of in recent months, maybe even years.
The premise of this site’s content is it’s “all about sun, sea and sex, watch these crazy men and women on vacation and go wild.” That sums up the story for every scene. It feels very real. This doesn’t make me think there’s a casting director and producer trying to create something sexy. It is more of a site that gives me the feeling of young men and women just having spontaneous fun and lots of sex.
There are known pornstars on this site including Mea Malone and Amirah Adara, just to name a few in the newest scene. This is probably as close as you’re going to get to true exhibitionism porn even though it looks to be in a controlled environment.
It’s rare for me to say the sex is a major plus, but that’s the case on this site. These people look like they have been waiting all day to have sex and go at it like the doomsday clock is ticking down – got to get just one more orgasm! It makes the sex really stand out compared to most porn sites. The word organic sounds funny in porn, but that is the feeling on Summer Sinners.
There are currently 66 scenes with two new updates per month. All of the videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p and 1080p or streamed in those as well. Some of the scenes also have 4K downloads. The photos are a nice addition and can be downloaded as well.
What looks like realistic and believable sex also leads to realistic and believably short scenes. That is kind of a con. The ability to make these scenes look spontaneous could even qualify as a con. If there are more than 2-4 people in the scene, the camera has to switch from couple to couple and sometimes the couples are not even close to each other in proximity. The combination of these possible cons is the biggest downside to the site for me. Not only are the cameras moving from couple to couple, but some scenes are even daytime (sunlight) during the first 7-8 minutes then goes to evening (dusk) for the final 7-8 minutes of the scene. That’s a little disappointing. There are 8-10 people in the scene and it’s clearly filmed over a 12 hour period – why only a 15 minute scene? If these scenes were in the 30-60 minute range, this site would score even higher with me. By the end of the outdoor group scenes there’s a feeling that I didn’t even see what all happened between each couple.
There could be another slight problem depending on the viewer. There is a mixture of languages being spoken. Subtitles would help a lot. Some of the models (male and female) speak English, others don’t and some speak English, but you can tell it’s not their native language. There’s a lot of laughing and funny things being said which I believe would add to the scenes if I knew what was being said.
It’s still a very good site just for the varied settings. The indoor scenes are often better just because you don’t get the moving around of cameras. The sex, indoor and outdoor, front door and back door (more fitting?) is very believable. There is a lot of playfulness in the scenes and I do get the feeling these models are having fun. It’s enjoyable to watch. I just wish the scenes were longer and I understood the different languages being spoken. I hope my score isn’t too high based on subjectivity of finally seeing porn that looks people having fun and sex at the same time. It tops the feeling of “this is supposed to be romantic and dull” or “this is supposed to be rough and unpleasant for the woman” and hits a sweet spot of having fun and sex.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The name of the site threw me off course. This is an Australian site.
Some really good voyeur-style scenes.
The site has 43 scenes and is updating twice per month.
Here’s you a pro/con depending on the person, pubic hair and hair in other places too which I will go into.
There are photo sets that are downloadable and high quality, but only 32 of those.
Video quality is very good, but no 4K.
Cons:
The pubic hair probably isn’t a turn-off for most, but there’s body hair I have read others complain about – underarm on the women.
Scenes are way too short and there are behind the scenes videos mixed in.
Bottom Line:
One of the first things I thought when checking this site out was Atlanta (my sometimes home), Miami (wish it was my full-time home) and I was thinking like an American – not to mention, stereotyping. I was expecting a site based on stepfamily porn from southern states. I am a regular user of Australian sites like Abby Winters and Girls Out West. I don’t know why the Southern name is in there. I didn’t study much geography.
My first thought when looking at the models was there are some really pretty models on here. One that really stood out to me is one I know from other Australian sites – Ruby Valentine, she’s one of my favorites even. I don’t know if I have just missed it on other sites, but she has full, black, underarm hair on this site. I am not going to say that’s a turn-off for me, but will say it’s not a turn-on for me either. Being of fair-complexion, I don’t have a lot of body hair and it’s just not something I’m used to seeing on women. I don’t mind her pubic hair at all. I believe pubic hair on darker complected models is sexy.
That seems to be the basis of the site. It says it showcases people celebrating themselves and life. There are some interesting scenes I have never seen on other sites or if I have, those other sites made the scenes look contrived. For example, there is a scene titled, “Yoga Lesson” and it’s 6-7 women outdoors, nude, doing yoga. Where it kind of falls flat is there’s no sex at all in it. It looks like 6-7 real women just doing naked yoga in the wilderness. Is there a big market for “porn” like that? I get the part that says this could be a fantasy for someone to walk up on a group of nude women doing yoga, but they are seriously doing yoga and not just doing it for preparation for an all-out, wild orgy.
The solo scenes are probably my favorite scenes on this site, aided by Ruby Valentine being in a couple of those. I watched the behind the scenes videos just to see if maybe those were the BTS videos that are interesting. I’m going on the side of personal preference, I didn’t find those very interesting, no more than I would a Netflix documentary on new-age therapy. Maybe the variation in scenes offers some value and interest? There are scenes (I typed sins) with voyeurism, but just a few. One of the niches I would like to see more of has a scene of it on this site. A guy standing at the door, masturbating, while watching a couple have sex. I really believe that’s a niche that is way underused in porn. It could even be a woman standing at the door, masturbating, while watching a couple have sex. That’s an element I don’t think porn producers these days think about. Us that are watching it are like the person standing at the door. I would make a whole site of that niche.
I do think the site is worth checking out especially if either of these parts interest you – Ruby Valentine (she has 5 solo scenes on here that are all great) or hairy porn interests you. Maybe that should be called “natural” porn? Seems more marketable to me. The sex is believable. The videos can be downloaded at 540p, 720p and 1080p. The photo sets can be downloaded as well, but I do believe if Ruby Valentine and hairy doesn’t interest you, you may not like this site as much as I do.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- About as close to exhibitionism as you can find these days on pay sites.
- Video count is in the thousands, but is misleading.
- Photos with downloadable zips (a major plus on a site like this)
- Some good exhibitionism including full sex and these are amateurs.
- I would call it a voyeur site based on most of the scenes are filmed more like the couple or group doesn't know it.
- Very fast download speeds (90% of max)
- CCBill is the biller.
Cons:
- The biggest con is there are many videos on this site that are split into parts, as many as 17 (maybe more, that's the most I've seen). See bottom line.
- No dates on the scenes. The only way to tell the newer scenes are likely over the last few years is the people's iPhone 6+ or higher laying near them. That's putting in research work.
- Besides the obvious known problems with amateur models (some unattractive), there's no way to find more content of ones you like.
Bottom Line:
I'm pacing myself to my 500th review and thought I would try this site out. Fundamentally, there's nothing at all wrong with the site. Some of the videos are downloadable in HD. All the videos are downloadable. They have a nice section called "Albums" that has all the different photo sets of women they don't have videos of. It just has a few minor flaws.
Those split up videos are almost understandable. They are usually a Swinger Party, there are people everywhere. The split parts focus on one couple or threesome. It reminds me of watching the male stripper sites like Dancing Bear and Party Hardcore. It's hard to fault them for splitting those long scenes up to focus on a couple. One of my biggest complaints about those two male stripper sites was they took the camera off the sexiest women. But there's no way to find all the parts. And they are short videos (3-5 minutes).
I'm not going to be that rough on the score on that part. I would be complaining if they filmed 2 hour scenes and switched the camera from sexy woman to not sexy woman.
This is sex, some masturbation and some of it is just flashing/spying. I don't know where it's filmed at but I am guessing it's not in the United States.
I'm also going to guess it's near impossible to know if they are updating. There are no dates. With Covid over the last 15 months, it just seems unlikely they are. This is more like the porn sites we used to join to enjoy the hunt. That's what you're going to be doing here.
Just to show the difficulty the site creates, there is a scene I really liked titled Voyeur Sex On The Beach 55, part 03/06. They show 12 related videos over to the right but none of those are Voyeur Sex On The Beach 55, part 02, 01, 04. However, they did get a Voyeur Sex On The Beach 56 part 04/04 in the related. It reminds me of the old newsgroup websites. The search does partially work. If you search for Voyeur Sex On The Beach 55, it will bring up all the Voyeur Sex On The Beach scenes but doesn't recognize the number on the title.
Technical quality can't really be complained about. The videos are easily and quickly downloaded, even the 1080p ones. The videos have screencaps with them but those differ from the photo sets in the "Albums" section. The albums section seems to be pure voyeurism of someone taking pictures of a nude woman walking around.
With so many sites known for their exhibitionism shoots no longer shooting those types, it leaves us who like public exhibitionism looking for replacements. My score is more based on this is real exhibitionism/voyeurism, the site works well, the quality is there, the downloads are there and I think for most exhibitionism fans the attractiveness of the woman isn't the attraction. Most of these women would at worst be considered "average" looking. The sex scenes have a problem all amateur sites have. There's only one camera view. They are still good.
I just don't know if a membership is warranted unless you just want to try a relatively cheap public site for a month. I have seen worse but not many with much better, especially of amateurs.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very realistic, amateur (I think), exhibitionism scenes
The most unscripted porn I have seen.
Variety of scenarios including lesbian, group, threesomes and foursomes.
Good camerawork for this type of porn.
Small site, but is newer with 38 scenes in less than a year.
Cons:
Streaming only
There is so much talking in the scenes and maybe one out of 5 people are speaking English. The potential for hot stories is there, but I don’t know what they’re saying.
Price is high for a streaming only site.
Bottom Line:
The scenes on this site have so much potential to be even better than they are. The first video I watched from it has a very young, maybe 19 year old, slender woman in a bikini with another woman using a wand vibrator on her while a guy is watching and getting a handjob from the woman who the wand is being used on. Some time passes and the guy moves to between the slender woman’s legs and sticks his dick in her while the other woman continues to use the wand on the slender woman. The guy says some English, “Very tight” and you can see he is visibly having problems penetrating her. Before this scene is halfway through the woman using the wand on the slender woman is naked and receiving oral from the slender woman while the guy is still having sex with her. Another woman enters the scene and the guy switches to her. I was left with the feeling the last woman to enter was his girlfriend or wife and she had been watching him have his fun with the younger women. But with no English it is hard to say for sure.
The streaming only is a downside to the site since I feel like this is the type of content you don’t or won’t see on a regular basis. These 38 scenes would be worth downloading for those times you wanted something a little less mainstream.
The scenes vary in location from a driving van to the beach to boats to indoors, but all stick with the summer theme. Nearly all of the scenes have the woman in a bikini or bathing suit. The exhibitionism is as much voyeurism as exhibitionism, multiple scenes have someone watching and masturbating. There are some scenes that involve sports and activities like naked yoga. There are scenes of women using wand vibrators while a group of women watch. It does seem unscripted to me. You will notice a guy just start touching a fully clothed woman and before you know it his hand is down her panties while others are looking or having sex too.
It kind of reminds me of the sites Party Hardcore and Dancing Bear without the male strippers. The women look to be having a lot of fun. They will even reach for their friend or friends to join in and help.
If this site had subtitles or English speakers with downloads I could see scoring it 10 points higher than my already good score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It was bound to happen, I knew since the day I saw this site I would have to join it.
- I know very little about Vitaly but the way I understand it he's a known prankster on Youtube. He's decided to add porn stars to his pranks.
- Funny, goofy, public exhibitionism pranks that include some really sexy ones.
- Good price that changed to $7.95 when I went to the site. It includes another site that says it's free for 30 days. It's called Hot Girls 4K or something like that. I just canceled it since as you can see I don't remember the name of it.
- This type of porn takes a lot of nerve and set of steel balls. He's got naked women getting suntan oil put on them right out in public at a park.
- Fun site as a diversion from regular porn.
Cons:
- No downloads.
- I get the feeling the content will probably disappear/be removed eventually.
- Some really goofy ones like the Zombie Miami one.
- Don't plan on using the model list. It gives you a 404 page missing page.
Bottom Line:
This site is owned by the same people that own Mr. Skin. They even offer you a free or very cheap version of Mr. Skin when you join. I passed as I was just interested in seeing what all this Vitaly guy could get into.
I'm counting right at 105 scenes. I'm going to through some of the scenarios since I think this is the one major and even rare strength a site like this can have.
Topless cop prank: A male cop and a very well-built female cop walk around and the female cop pops her boobs out at those passing by. The real humor comes in when the cops start simulating having sex and real cops drive by. That's when the scene starts ending.
Topless Elevator Prank: Who hasn't got on an elevator and hoped there would be a gorgeous topless porn star standing there?
Topless Pizza Delivery Prank: The good thing about this one is porn has tried to make the fictional version of this prank. This is the real version of it.
A small Asian woman riding around in a car flashing everyone.
There are some scenes that go into sex as well. There's a How to Eat Ass scene.
One I thought was really funny was a porn star showing strangers her porn videos on her phone. They look at the scene, kind of are shocked, then look at her and look back at the screen.
This is one time having pro models was the right decision. It shows a fun side of the models and how most of them don't take themselves too seriously.
They even take us back to the days of the classic site Action Girls with topless women on a gun range shooting machine guns. You will then see a public beach scene with one model pulling her bikini down and the other model going down on her right out in public.
It's a unique site that could probably be a lot bigger hit if they had more money to make more scenes. Most of those scenes have the actual scene then a behind the scenes scene of it. I do think they would have to add downloads since this kind of reminds me of the old Brazzers site Asses In Public where they once had 100 scenes and now only have around 12.
They have a game show scene with a BBW who sits on the loser's face and it's called, "The Big Ass Game Show". I think the best scene is the suntan lotion at a public park. The basis of most of these if it's not clear is the guy(s) don't know it's a prank. So they will be putting the oil/lotion on the model in a bikini. She takes her top off and the guy's eyes pop out of his head.
I don't know, maybe the Coronavirus lockdown has caused this public porn to be more interesting since I'm not going out in public very much right now?
I think an 85 is the highest I have ever scored a streaming-only site. It just hits a niche I really like and with the cheap price it's a good membership to try out for a month. Especially if you're bored with regular porn. The scenes are not long and to me that just adds to the realness of it. Maybe it's more of a novelty porn site? A fun idea that could be even better.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large collection of Outdoor Japanese porn scenes.
- 160 models and includes a model list which helps if you're not familiar with Japanese models.
- It says 506 scenes which is less than it had when TBP last reviewed it but it's not uncommon for these public/exhibitionism scenes to get removed.
- Mixture of quality, these are from DVDs, I think and you'll find some that are 720x420, some that are HD, it's a niche I'm interested in enough that I don't mind as much about the quality.
- Good download speeds (80% of max).
- Good PU/TBP discount
- Includes access to All-Japanese Network
- Vendo is the biller
- Now has downloads of screencaptures in zips
- Navigation works well
Cons:
- Weird camerawork. Will explain in BL.
- Mosaics if you don't like the censoring, it is censored but I like the creativity it forces.
- No streaming unless it's because of my browser. I don't stream but thought I would mention it.
Bottom Line:
I like Japanese and most Asian models and my favorite niche in porn is exhibitionism. It's no surprise I like the combination.
I considered putting this in the pros but think it needs more explanation. This is legitimate exhibitionism. They do a good job of finding locations that while in public and while you can see life going on in the distance, they're having sex right in public. It's well thought out and planned. You can tell they know when an area isn't going to have many people if any in direct view. One of the scenes, a male and female are having sex right on a platform that looks like somewhere tourists would stand.
Besides that really positive paragraph, I'll mention the weird camerawork. Face, mosaic, face, boobs, mosaic, face in about 12 seconds. It reminds me a little of those old Japanese action shows. It's almost like stop motion. This isn't in all scenes but it's in enough that I noticed it.
The content is censored. One of my favorite parts of censored Japanese porn is when the boobs become exposed. I had never been into boobs until I started watching Japanese censored porn. It's like the moment the censorship angels sing. They have full boobs showing in most of these. There is a good variance as well. It's not just Male/Female having sex in public.
There is costume teasing, masturbation, threesomes, blowjobs, handjobs, some are at a beach.
I know how rare exhibitionism porn is so I am going easy on the video quality. If this site had 720p on every scene, I would have scored it higher.
I also mentioned the downloadable photos/screencaps since it looks like when TBP last reviewed this specific site they listed no downloads on the photos/screencaps. They do have them now and they are mixed in with the video downloads. Photos are almost as important as videos in exhibitionism porn. There's only so much that can be caught with moving video.
The navigation works how it should. It only gives you categories and models from this site instead of the whole network. It's something American networks need to take notes on.
I do think this site is more of a catered to site and could bring very subjective opinions. Fans of exhibitionism are likely going to like it a lot. If the exhibitionism part doesn't do it for you, it's a lot like a regular porn site.
They have 506 scenes listed and anyone that follows exhibitionism knows that's a lot. The TBP review had nearly 700 but there's more discrepancies. The highest download resolution listed on TBP is 700x400, it's 720x420, but there are also quite a few HD scenes. Those are even marked with an HD button on them. Something has changed over the years. Each of the 506 scenes also have downloadable pictures.
It's worth mentioning for those into exhibitionism, the network also has two other sites that has flashing and exhibitionism and my feeling is the same there as with this site. It's going to bring subjective opinions on how risky it is (not that risky). It's still about as close as we are getting to exhibitionism porn these days which I think is even more rare in Japan.
Recommending it is hard. The mosaic will turn a lot against it. If that doesn't bother you and you like to see people having sex and the above listed niches in public places you might like it as well as I do or even better than I do.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It's like watching everything that goes on at the beach!
Public exhibitionism, voyeuristic, with a lot of content of 100% amateurs.
More sex than I thought there would be.
They have over 6,500 videos and 125,000 photos.
CCBill takes your money to the site.
The updates don't seem to be scheduled, but when they update, they post 10+ videos and hundreds of pictures, those come several times a month.
Cons:
There's nothing here that you're used to on porn sites. No model list, no search box.
Camera problems, a lot of the videos are shot from a distance that you can see everything, but not anything that clearly.
Short videos, it's probably part of the niche.
Bottom Line:
I was becoming frustrated and even bored with the glossy world of mainstream porn.
I was watching a scene on a tube site where a "wife" was getting suntan lotion rubbed on her by a stranger. The stranger decided she needed some suntan lotion on her parts covered by her bikini. I found it oddly erotic. I don't think I ever thought about beach porn.
The site is easy to use which I was not expecting. It looks like the last time they programmed it was before the internet was created. It's instead really easy to use and I kind of find the colors to be pleasant to my eyes. There are no ads anywhere on the site.
You have these choices:
Sex on the Beach, they have 1,005 of these scenes.
Nudism, they have 4,441 of these.
Then, 514 topless, 48 changing room, 334 foreplay and 119 not straight. That's how they have it listed. I found that a little confusing since I knew what it likely meant (gay), but thought maybe it meant the camera angle was off center. It is an amateur site.
This is very easy to use and find what you're looking for, but I won't go too far on the praising. When you click, "Sex on the Beach", it opens a page of the 18 newest videos. There's 56 of these pages.
I liked that they list the "author", but after watching enough scenes, I realized the "author" is the person filming it not one of the people involved in the scene.
The sex scenes are good, but I think it's because they're in public and you can hear the ocean washing in. The part I felt most disappointed in was the cumshots. Some of them use condoms and cum in the condom. Other times the guy jumps up, woman on her knees in front of him and all you see is his hairy back since the camera is behind them. When you do get the right angle on the cumshot it's one of those where the distance makes it nearly impossible to see. You have to go more by the woman's reaction.
I do get the feeling most if not all of this is filmed on nude beaches. The nudism videos have multiple nude people walking around and besides just seeing someone nude and unaroused there's not a lot of sexual energy in these.
The videos are downloadable in 720p, so they are good quality. It's just that distance that causes a problem with seeing the action. It kind of feels like I'm wanting a professional porn studio to go shoot these scenes with 3-4 cameras.
This is a community site and it has a forum for members to post in. I'm not really for sure what to think of it. One of the downsides to having a forum is it shows disgruntled customers. There are numerous posts about archives of content disappearing. There also are hardly no new posts on it. I only see one from 2020 and 6 from 2019. I will confirm they are adding content.
It wasn't really what I was looking for. I think I should maybe look for bikini/beach porn filmed with the camera closer, but it's not a bad site for seeing some surprising beach situations. If you're like me you might get frustrated with some of the content. Like 7 minutes of the guy and woman talking (you can't hear them), then 2 minutes of sex. Did they just have 9 minutes of video to use? It's probably rare content and I'm sure that makes it appealing to someone out there. I'm giving them an 80 for at least having 720p video and they do have zip files for their photos. Some of these look like aerial views.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Unique niche. Not a lot of sites do exhibitionism. And this site does it over the top. Public Disgrace stages elaborate shoots with many bystanders. While I'm sure all the backgroud people are in on the scene - it makes very hot and believable public humiliation
- Almost 480 videos as of February 15, 2020
- 1 hour long on average (incudes exit interview)
- Video looks great at 1280X720 5 mbps - great production value.
- Allows download managers
- Extreme action models are spit on, written on, called names, etc. (this could just as easily have gone in the Cons for how extreme it is)
- Never the same thing twice. They have a huge amount of variation within this topic
- Easy organization. There's a heart system to easily find what you want to save. There's also a 5 point rating system so you can see what others have been enjoying
- Top talent along with new comers. I find plenty of my favorites and find new gems.
Cons:
PROS CONT
- Good model diversity in every imaginable way: body type, ethnicity, age
- plenty of orgy content, fisting, extremes
- interesting plots and set ups. They have more imagination that I do!
- Models are put in humiliating situations and degraded. This may be too much for some - but if it's what you're looking for, few do it better
CONS
- Infrequent updates: Current schedule looks to be 2/month (although last one was Jan. 21st 2019 - I hope this doesn't mean the end of this site. I'm hoping there was just a break in the action)
- You need to suspend your disbelief a little bit. For example they may be shooting on a bus but it's the same "extras" each time
- Many sets are international - I prefer English so this can be a distraction
- More expensive than most sites (although with excellent production and a wide array of models you are getting what you pay for)
- cross sells inside the member side
- A lot of talent that I've never seen before (this could just as easily be a Pro)
Bottom Line:
- Some of the real standout talent includes doms Mona Wales, Steve Holmes and Mz. Berlin. I'm a big fan of both. I find that anytime Mona Wales is dirty talking I go crazy.
- Some of the best scenes with subs were the vids by: Cadence Lux, Ashley Lane, Cherry Kiss, Isabella Clark, Lilyan Red
I don't think any network does BDSM as well as kink.com does. This site does the humiliation/exhibitionism better than any. The imagination is incredible.
If you are interested I highly recommend looking at their previews 1st. Previews run a minute and a half to 2 minutes and give you a good idea of the action. A lot of this was more intense than my interest.
A lot of the shoots start with a girl being stripped outside and walking around before she goes to a "public" place to be gang banged. The "public" place may be a shop/bar/restaurant/bus/whatever. It seems like the windows are done one way so you see people walking past - but since they have no reaction to what's happening inside I'm guess there's some film magic going on.
Even with a high price, I think this is a solid buy. Enjoy some previews to make sure it's not to extreme for you. If you like that, you'll find plenty to enjoy.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- All content is 1080p, even the oldest videos dating back to 2016.
- Clips are edited well, sometimes they're slowed down to increase run time but its never distracting.
Cons:
- Expensive! Compared to network sites, you're getting very little content for what you pay for. A clip is uploaded every couple days but they vary in length, often they are only 2 or 3 minutes long.
- Despite listing 'Beachsome' content on the main page, you're only getting the latest 25 videos and archived content from 2016 and 2017.
- Website is cumbersome to navigate. 5 of the 7 categories outside of City and Beach (Extra, Welcome To, Events, Interviews, and Paparazzi) have very little content and are updated once a month, or every couple months.
Bottom Line:
- I do NOT recommend this website. I don't plan to reactivate my account after my first month because there simply isn't enough content to justify the price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's a public nudity/sex site that has a network with it but some of it doesn't work.
- There are 183 scenes with no dates and no update schedule.
- Has that real public feel to it. They're mostly in the woods and under drainage corridors.
- Good high-end video quality at 1080p with 8000 bitrate, but the next option down drops all the way to 480p.
- Six sites included with membership, maybe.
- Paypal/Epoch is biller.
- Good looking women, a lot of public sites look like they found the models while searching for a place to film.
Cons:
- The extra sites don't work. I had 6 tell me my login is wrong and one was warned by Firefox as having an expired certificate.
- As mentioned in the pros, the high end video is 1080p, the next step down is 480p.
- Most of the other sites "included" aren't ones I would be interested in, one is a knockoff of Bang Bros Bang Bus called Take Van.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site after seeing a preview for it on a tube site.
My main feeling without going into anything specific is if you like outdoors sex it might be worth a join just for these public scenes.
I really don't know how public these scenes are, but they are outdoors. I am guessing this is filmed somewhere in Europe. And I don't recognize any of these models, these all look like amateurs.
Some of the scenes are shot on a beach but I don't see anyone around. Others are shot at what looks like the backyard of a house near a pool. I think if you use a little imagination they do enough to at least make it seem like it's in public.
The camerawork, which is something I don't talk about a lot, could be improved. At times, it feels like the cameraman is laying on his side trying to get a better view and it gives a bad view of the action.
Having said that, this is still a site with nearly 200 scenes of outdoor amateur sex and if you're into any kind of exhibitionism/public/outdoor, you know there's not a lot of this content available these days. One of the parts I've liked best about the scenes I've watched is the energy from the women. Which makes me believe even more so that this is an amateur site. I wouldn't rate any of the women over an 8 but wouldn't rate any of them under a 5.
The big question is what's going on with the network? This is supposed to be a full network. Each of their videos starts with this "WWMAMM" and it has a button to view all their sites. The network itself is called MMPNetwork, but I can't even sign in the hub. The other sites they show are the Melone Challenge, POVBitch, TakeVan, FakeShooting, ShootYourself and Teeny Playground. My login works on zero of them.
One thing that surprised me is some of the scenes are fairly hardcore, including slaps that leave hand prints on the model's faces. One scene was almost too hardcore for me to make it through as two guys took turns holding the woman, slapping her and what I assume is cussing her, I don't have a clue what they're saying.
That could be a turnoff for the exhibitionism fans since exhibitionism is usually about focusing on the woman.
It's frustrating overall, some of the content it really good, some of it looks like it shouldn't have been released and none of the network sites let me sign in. It's hard to believe a site would go through the trouble of getting Paypal/Epoch as a biller then turn around and have this much going wrong with the network. Take a look at the preview before joining. If it doesn't improve or if I can't get access into any of the other sites, I'll probably come back and adjust the score down a little. TBP lists a 10 video per day download limit, I downloaded 57 and didn't hit any limit. I hate to sound cynical but seeing that nothing else works right on the network, maybe it broke their download limit too! I'm giving it a decent score for the good exhibitionism scenes but could easily see knocking 10 points off of it if things don't improve. I've been a member for two weeks, so I'll update the review in a few weeks to see if they've worked the kinks out or if they're not giving any bonus sites.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Public exhibitionism porn with a little disgracing.
470 scenes that include downloadable videos and photos.
Broad array of models are featured here, shapes, sizes, colors.
The outdoor scenes are my favorite and are the best examples of public exhibitionism I have seen.
The scenes are full of different fetishes. Anal, DP, multiple cumshots, hose, legs, oral, vaginal, sex toys, it's the closest I have seen to a site that brings up the old saying of "everything but the kitchen sink".
Cons:
Stopped updating in January of 2019, the site had a banner on it that said there was going to be new content over the summer, but it never transpired.
The newer scenes feel more contrived. There's less feeling of spontaneity.
Bottom Line:
This is the type of site I could really get into. The majority of scenes start with a naked woman being walked around in public or displayed indoors for people to look at. The disgrace part is usually not that disgraceful.
The scenes all have a familiar start, but after the start there really is no way to know where the scene is going. I think that's a very important part of a niche site like this. You know the woman is going to have sex, probably anal sex, probably oral sex and get cummed on, but you don't know how many guys are going to be involved, if another woman is going to show up and maybe give her oral or use a Magic Wand on her or where they will end up as far as the location.
I didn't list it as a pro or con, but one part I think falls between those is the length of the scenes. Some of these scenes are over an hour long and they can be tiresome to the viewer. Just when you think they've settled into a position, they change positions, change rooms or locations and everything starts over again. I'm not for sure how to grade that part. It's good in some scenes and very distracting in other scenes.
I do know that most of the scenes are very hot even if you want to grab them and tell them to stop moving around so much. The women on this site seem to be well-prepared for the multiple penetrations and that takes away the disgrace part for me. You will see a few acts of what I would call violence, like slaps and spitting, but usually the woman is as aggressive as the men.
I don't think no new updates hurts it unless you already have all the scenes. At 470 scenes, most averaging nearly an hour, it's not likely that you're going to run out of this content if you're really into it.
The public part could be questioned as a lot of the scenes are indoors with an audience. This is like the previous might be a pro, might be a con, I think some of the hottest scenes on it are the indoor ones. Maybe it just makes the performers more comfortable.
The production quality is good, but I do think they could use more direction or more cameras. Sometimes the action is focused on where there's not much action.
It's still a very good site on an excellent network and worth checking out if you're into exhibitionism.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Beautiful EE/Russian models
- Twins!
- Scenes on location in Thailand
- Interesting variety
- Exclusive scenes
- Streaming and downloads
- Multiple download resolutions
- Photos as singles and zips
- Logical site layout
- Low price
- Allows download managers
- Fast download speeds
Cons:
- Small site
- Doesn’t appear to be updating
- Large watermark on all videos
- All POV (with a cameraman who isn’t good at it)
Bottom Line:
I could start and end this review by simply writing ‘petite redheaded twins’ which alone should be enough to cause people to buy a membership but I’ll add a few more details.
The premise of the site is that the site owner/talent/cameraman is a fashion photographer who brings in models to his Thailand home to shoot them and ends up having sex with them. It’s a pretty thin premise but it doesn’t interfere with the scenes so it isn’t an issue. Each ‘shoot’ takes place over five days with some outdoor photos, outdoor sex, pool sex, indoor sex and some dancing in a nightclub. The sex scenes are all POV and there is really nothing unusual about them. That’s neither good or bad but if you join looking for twist you won’t find it here.
Most scenes start with an outdoor photoshoot. In many cases the sex begins outside but then moves inside. In a few cases the entire sex scene is shot outdoors.
One advantage that the site does have is that it offers rare ‘on location’ shoots in Thailand. I’m presuming that this site is able to shoot in Thailand simply because the site owner/male talent lives there.
The site is very small with only 15 scenes offered. There are three separate shoots with each purportedly shot over five days. The only models on the site are Kitty and Nikky Fox, a model named Cassie I’m not familiar with and Gina Gerson (as Valentina on this site).
I wouldn’t ordinarily describe the models on a site but since there are only four of them and three are relative unknowns it might help to do that this time. The Fox Twins (Nikky and Kitty) are identical 20-year-old twins from Hungary. I wasn’t aware of them until this site was listed and they don’t have much else on the internet. Nikky does have more scenes than Kitty and in some scene she has black hair though I think her natural colour is the reddish hair she sports on this site. The twins are petite and have a girl-next-door look to them. I hope to see more of them.
I know nothing about the model named Cassie. She’s a young brunette from somewhere in Eastern Europe. She’s also got a girl-next-door glow about her. She’s also got the only anal scene on the site. I’ve searched for her on model indexes but haven’t found anything.
Gina Gerson needs no introduction to porn collectors. Gina is a late-20s (though she doesn’t look over 20) petite Russian blonde. For Gina fans this site may be a necessary addition to your collection simply because she has little to no makeup on through the scenes and her natural beauty shines through. As Gina is well known for her anal sex this site is a rare collection of vaginal-only scenes.
The site itself is logical and easy to use, but it should be with only 15 scenes. There are some ads but they are easily ignored if you want to tune them out.
The scenes are available in streaming and downloads. I’m happy to report that the streaming doesn’t start automatically when the page loads. That’s a pet peeve of mine. There are no resolution options for streaming but there are four available for the downloads. Those are: 1920x1080 (4900 kb/s), 1280x720 (2300), 854x480 (1100), 640x360 (660). The bitrate is low on all of the videos and while that does help keep the file size down it also means that even the 1080p scenes aren’t as crisp as they could be.
Photos are also available as singles and zips. They are 2600x1463 resolution.
I had no issues using a download manager and I found that the site had fast download speeds.
The site has a few minor flaws. Every video has a watermark that is much bigger than it needs to be. Also, all of the scenes are shot POV (this does appear to be a one-man operation). Well shot POV is rare and takes some real talent. The guy on this site doesn’t have the talent that comes from experience so his camera work is often unsteady. If the site continues to grow the owner should make an investment in some stationary cameras set up on tripods.
The biggest flaw in the site is that it doesn’t appear to be updating. When I joined the site had three separate five-day shoots and that’s all that is there still. I have no idea whether more shoots will ever be added and if they are when they might be uploaded. But to be safe it’s probably best to assume that this site won’t update again.
While some may disagree, I think that this site still offers fair value even though it’s small, doesn’t appear to be updating and has a few other minor flaws. But I admit that I’m looking at this through the lens of an avid porn collector rather than someone who spends time on pirated Tube sites. I think that $15 for 15 exclusive and unique scenes with some beautiful models shot in exotic locations is good value. My personal bottom line is that I’m happy with my membership and I’m glad I joined. It’s worth checking out the tour pages at least.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The site claims to have 1236 Movies and 283 models and as far as I can tell that's pretty accurate, you can go back all the way to videos from 2004 (and surprising enough, a lot, if not all of the older videos have remastered versions which are very good 1280x720 quality)
- Regular updates (I'd say maybe every 3-5 days there's a new video going up)
- Not all videos have photos, but those that do have a very useful zipped archive and even a larger resolution zipped archive.
- Definitely amateur models, don't think I recognize any of them, but overall the selection is pretty good with a range of body types and looks.
- The content is mostly girls masturbating, but there is a lot of variation in location, toys used and length of the scene. There are a lot of videos from festivals showing nude women dancing or wet t-shirt contests, decent amount of girl girl action (hard to navigate the categories, but maybe about 100 scenes), about 40 or so scenes of blowjobs.
Cons:
- The site looks dated, the search is not great and the categories are not always that descriptive or easy to navigate.
- The model page is pretty bare bones, it's useful to see all scenes from one model in one place, but they often don't even have a photo of the model, just her name and how many scenes she is in.
- Camera work is pretty bad at times with a lot of jerky movements and a lot of scenes have a very distinct "college" feel. There are several scenes of weed smoking, the camera man making bad jokes about the sex toys and several of the girls don't really seem that interested in the action.
- Slow download speeds on the largest videos (as far as I can tell these are pretty much uncompressed high bit-rate videos that are not that different from the HD mp4's and the site does warn you it will be slow so there's that)
Bottom Line:
I'm a fan of amateur content and several, if not all of the models here are clearly not professional porn actresses. There is a very distinct "unscripted" vibe and from the way several scenes go together I get the sense that the site owner finds girls who are willing to film and they hang out for a day or so shooting a bunch of different videos. This site in particular has the solo or lesbian scenes while some of the more hardcore stuff goes to After Hours Exposed.
Because of this the scenes on here end up really varied: there are some interviews with the girls, some shower scenes, some videos where the girls are already naked and it feels like they just finished another scene. It's a bit of a mixed bag that doesn't follow any strict steps, for better or worse.
The same thing extends to the models and videos as well. As with any site that uses mostly amateur girls some are more comfortable and fun, while a few seem a bit stiff and awkward. Some scenes, especially when there's natural light in the room end up looking really good, while in some scenes the light and angles are not really that great. Overall a mixed bag, I'd say a mostly positive mixed bag, but don't go in expecting the standardized production quality of a large budget porn network.
Something else that didn't really work for me, but I'm sure is a selling point of the site is the focus on a "party vibe". For example, there are a lot of photos and videos from festivals and "spring break". Some of the girls in these are really cute, but I didn't feel like it was really worth paying subscription to see a few seconds of some topless girls at a fest. Luckily, there are plenty of other videos with more explicit content so it's easy to ignore this content.
All of that said, I got access through a membership at Backroom Casting Couch and as part of that network this is certainly a good deal. Between ExCoGi (Exploited College Girls), the Casting Couch HD content and this site I can't think of a better network for amateur models. It's not big budget porn so it doesn't have that level of polish and there are some rough edges, but there are certainly several really hot videos here and there is so much content it's easy to skip the stuff that doesn't work for you.
P.S. for what it's worth I haven't had any of the issues with downloads or videos not playing that RagingBuddhist mentioned in his review, but your mileage may vary.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The much-maligned public sex site of the Kink network.
- There are a few newer sites that are trying to do the same genre and niche but Public Disgrace, to me, is the best at it and you get access to the Kink network too.
- Very good download speeds, 80% and up of my max.
- All of the scenes over the last year and a half are at least 50 minutes long and some are over an hour. (The importance of this will be in the BL)
- Still has that Kink style of quirkiness in the majority of the scenes.
- Though I think the creativity has dropped a little over the years, they're still setting the bar for production values.
- For this type of content, their catalog is huge, by my count they have 481 scenes. Most sites like this one have less than 100. And they update twice a month, like clockwork, including sometimes three times a month if the weeks fall right.
- If you're just focused on this site or one of the others on the network the navigation is very good.
Cons:
- I think they still have some problems with laws, you kind of get the feeling that it might disappear one day and never come back.
- If you're not careful the content can seem to be very repetitive but it's probably not fair to say that considering it's public sex.
- Another one for those who like to nitpick, not all scenes are truly "public". All scenes do have a crowd of people watching but seem to be in controlled environments.
Bottom Line:
Public Disgrace pushed boundaries when it first opened. The mere thought of what their scenes had them would make most people's eyes bug out of their head. They have a model or in a few cases, models, meet them somewhere usually public, could be a bus, could be a park, could be a bus stop, an adult video store or pretty much anywhere public you can think of. Most of the scenes start with the model being stripped, bound by rope and led around a city. If that makes you laugh or smile you'll probably love this site. In some of the scenes they stay in fairly public place but I've never been fully convinced that any of these areas aren't controlled environments. Does that take away from the experience? Not for me.
The model(s) is the most important part of the Public Disgrace scenes. Some are either really horny or wanting to leave a good impression. Those models are touching the clothed people while two guys are double penetrating her. Some are not as involved with the crowd and whether it's fair or not, those scenes fall pretty flat for me.
There's even a comment here on PU about when Kink was shutting Public Disgrace down. And they were down for awhile but out of nowhere, they showed back up and started updating again. This is the biggest compliment I can give this site and Kink overall:
This site is why I join Kink's network with year memberships. There's months that I only get two new scenes then the lucky ones with three and I think those scenes alone are worth the subscription price. I like other sites on the Kink Network but I could join once a year to get those scenes. The Public Disgrace updates are ones I don't want to wait for.
Not to advertise a different site but to show how difficult this style is, especially in the United States, Brazzers had Asses in Public. It was similar to Public Disgrace without bondage. The last time I was on Brazzers, Asses in Public only had a dozen or so scenes. It used to have near 100 but they had to take some of them down. Public Disgrace/Kink obviously spends a lot of time making sure they are cleared to shoot this style of porn.
You will notice a difference in the scenes if you go back and watch scenes from the first few years compared to now but I do believe in the last year and a half, their scenes have improved from where they were. The was a lull when no new scenes were coming out then they went to shorter scenes that were 20-30 minutes long. As mentioned in the pros, the last year and a half has scenes that are at least 50 minutes and a few go near 75 minutes. In this style of porn (exhibitionism, voyeurism, especially), that's a big deal. It gives more time for the buildup, the parts that don't look as controlled. You also get to see the model often laughing, sometimes blushing and I think that helps keep Kink on the "good guys" list as it shows the model's willingness to be involved in this debauchery.
The Kink quirkiness: This is the only porn studio I know of that surprises me. Sometimes it's something goofy like for those Game of Thrones fans, shortly after the Cersei "Walk of Shame", Kink put two nude models in a near identical walk of shame scene. There's psychology going on there since they know a lot of guys and women too were aroused by the Game of Thrones scene. There's more too, like the elderly man who jumps into a scene and starts groping a model. Is it staged and planned? Maybe but it's more than other studios are doing.
This site itself has 481 scenes as of 8/14/2018, they do have pictures but I still haven't seen a way to download them. I would think only the public pictures would be of any value to a viewer since you might see things you didn't catch in the video.
I'll mention that in my Kink Network review, I said Public Disgrace now has a subtitle of "Sluts in Spain". I'm not for sure why they did that other than to release two scenes that I assume were shot in Spain. I don't know where the majority of these scenes are shot but do know in the older scenes, there are some from San Francisco. I thought the Sluts in Spain was their new main location to film from since their header had the subtitle in it but it does seem to be just a few scenes as the newest scenes no longer say it.
It takes brave people to do these scenes. I would imagine performing in front of even planned audience members, would make it difficult for some models (both the males and females). Public Disgrace does by far the best job of it and their models, overall, are the most believable in this style of porn.
I do not list their video resolution as a con, anymore. The videos max out at 720p resolution but with the scenes being around an hour each, anything bigger on the resolution and the file sizes would be massive to download. It's still not perfect but it's well-above similar sites and in a class of its own.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership includes access to all Brazzers network (30 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Clean search. Keyword searching along with a search bar. Lots of sub-topics to pick up on.
- action break down you can cut right to the positions/stuff you like
- 1080p 1.8 mb/s
- Some content gems (but not enough to overcome the lack of catalogue - see below)
- The mobile site works well on my iPhone.
- Great content with Britney Stevens, Kelly Devine, Tricia Oaks and Luscious Lopez)
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
Cons:
- 14 scenes as of February 13, 2018
- The last update was in 2008
- Typical porn valley look. Make-up tends to be heavy. "Big Tits" means nearly all the models are surgically enhanced.
- Picture sets are large (a couple of 100 pics in each set) they are mostly screenshots of the action in the video.
- Cross-sells at sign up
Bottom Line:
I like public flashing content and I think this site could have really grown into a powerhouse. Unfortunately with only 14 videos there just isn't enough here to warrant a buy rating.
I love the fact that it seems like they interact with regular folks (unlike Kink, which is a long time favorite for me, where everyone gives you the feeling that they're an extra).
The only thing holding this site back is the fact that they killed it. If you see a favorite here you might want to pick up a subscription to the network. But in no way are 14 videos worth a full membership price.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+ Decent number of updates online
+ 3 file sizes for downloading
+ 2 resolutions for in-browser viewing
+ Network access*
+ Screen caps to preview video
+ Zip files for pictures
+ Updates on Tuesdays and Fridays
+ Search function
Cons:
- Flash popup picture viewing only
- File sizes not commensurate with video quality
- Quite a few files that don't play to the end
- A few failed downloads
- Layout seriously dated
- HOLD THE CAMERA STILL!
- *Duplicate files across sites in network
- Slightly higher cost to join
- Keyword search gives incomplete results
- Large Watermarks
Bottom Line:
OK... I'm the quintessential amateur fan so I'm willing to put up with less than the stellar quality video you get from the big name sites that mass produce their product. But this site really had me scratching my head, trying to figure out how to rate it. Lots of no name models. Love that! There's a bit of variety in the action, although it does tend to stick mostly to solo action. Still a plus for me. And it's got a bunch of the features you find on every other good site - search features, fairly simple navigation that, unfortunately, comes with a con mentioned below and network access (of sorts). The TBP review is dated because there are now 7 sites in the network: Iowa, Nebraska, South Beach and Euro Coeds along with After Hours Exposed, Nudes-a-Poppin Festival and Spring Break Life. The screen caps worked well to preview the videos. Picture sizes on amateur sites are almost always smaller than what you find elswhere so I'll call them more than respectable at 1600 long side for all the sites except for Nudes a Poppin which are considerably better at 3200 long side.
Now the other side of the coin. The file sizes on the newer material are insane! I mean seriously - how do you come up with a 7-1/2 gig, one hour file when it looks like something that could easily be around a gig? The quality isn't bad, but I've ripped DVDs to just over 2 gigs that look as good. But the real kicker is that none of the files over 4 gigs except from Nudes a Poppin would play to the end, even using VLC which will play pretty much anything. I tried re-encoding them to bring the sizes down but they still had the same freezing issue. Then there's the all too common layout and design. Definitely an early 2000s look and functionality here. There's a template for downloading every file that, in the case of some, belie the fact that that video doesn't exist in that resolution. Next, while on the issue of video, I really got to wondering if the guys behind the camera were hopped up on caffeine or "something stronger". Sure - live action means moving around to catch everything going on, but it would be nice if the camera was steady for zoom closeups and that was almost non-existent. Last of the major faults I find in this site is why they even bother calling it a network when there are scenes from just about every site in the other sites. The majority of that shows up with Nudes a Poppin' videos making up more than half of the videos in all the sites but Nebraska Coeds - but there are still plenty in Nebraska as well.
Other issues:
- When will sites stop using flash only picture viewing?
- When a word search turns up more pages of results than the same keyword, the videos haven't been tagged correctly.
- Server gets slugglish at certain times of the day, leading me to believe the majority of the signups are from the U.S. AND what could have caused the few failed downloads.
So here's the wrap up. I really wanted to like this site, but the problems left me wondering why they think it's worth the extra $3 a month over the usual $30 to deal with it all. As I see it, the site needs a lot of work. A layout redesign and some re-encoding to get the file sizes down to reasonable AND playable would be a great start. I doubt I'll come back to this one anytime soon, if at all.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The upgrade package for Bang Bros, comes with 10 sites and this content, at one time, was stream-only, it's now downloadable.
- I tried joining directly through Dancing Bear, but the price was $29.95. If you're a member of Bang Bros, you add this package of sites for $19.95.
- Nice variety of niches in this package.
- Good download speeds, possibly from not as many members?
- Quite a bit of unique, exclusive content.
- Some fairly rare content if you're interested in certain niches.
- Has a party site, a Latina site, two college girl sites, a busty site, a solo site, an amateur site, a public site and a gameshow type CFNM site.
- Good navigation that's straightforward.
Cons:
- Back to the same problem as Bang Bros. The cancellation process is tucked away in the "library" link. Even worse, if you upgrade your Bang Bros membership to include this package, you now have two Bang Bros memberships listed in the options to cancel so you have to go through and cancel each one.
- None of these sites are updating and haven't been in over 2 years.
- The ads become a major factor once your regular Bang Bros membership has expired. You now can only access about half of the scenes on your browser window unless you want to rejoin Bang Bros.
- And the winner of the "are you fucking kidding me" award, there's another upgrade package! After joining this upgrade, a whole group of sites looking to be associated more with Middle Eastern models, including Mia Khalifa pops up.
Bottom Line:
I joined this upgrade package back when they were first offering it, guess that would have been 2011/2012. This review is going to be a bit back and forth.
The content here goes into unique niches that are rare. The party site, Dancing Bear, is by far the best of this type of content. They must have realized people were tired of bachelorette party theme and started shooting some of these scenes in sorority houses, in offices, and it does add a whole new dimension to the party atmosphere. The other big party site in another network, sticks to club, loud music, upwards of a couple hundred people. The Dancing Bear scenes have maybe 40-50 women tops and the strippers come out one at a time so you don't have a hundred different angles waiting for them to get that one hot amateur-looking woman.
I don't know why, but I love the CFNM Show content. I'm pretty sure I have a crush on the host of it. And she is involved in some of the scenes which makes it even better, but this was a very short-lived site.
College Rules and Haze Her are both very good sites as well. While the basis is a fairly-common one in porn, the girls, the settings, the laughing, giggling, makes both of these sites seem much more genuine than their counterparts on other networks.
There's the Brandi Belle solo site that is above average especially if you like Brandi. She's a very cute college girl in these scenes and it's somewhat setup to make it like she's auditioning the guys.
MyGF is an amateur site. I'd like to say all these are real amateurs, but I'm not positive of it. I noticed one Asian model who looks a lot like London Keyes, but these sets have the unique feel to them thanks to the additions of selfies in pictures, and what does seem like real couples.
Public Invasion is more or less a less risky version of the Kink public site. It's usually just a male/female outside having sex in the grass.
Busty Adventures is another short-lived site and it's what the title says except you know with Bang Bros, the average girl is usually busty, these are models that fall into the heavier/chubbier category.
Culineros is a Latina site that can be very good, but also very confusing. From the looks of it, Bang Bros had a dozen Latina sites they were trying to get started and most of this content isn't marked as Culineros, but it is included.
I saved that one for last because it can be confusing. The site is Culineros, but you'll see content from Sexo in Public, Mi Primer, Por el Chiquito, Tetangas, and this wouldn't be a problem except we all know how Bang Bros operates. Normally, if you download a scene from site that is not named on your membership, you are getting charged.
All the other sites in this package have the right site names on the scenes.
Here's some numbers: Dancing Bear - 128 scenes CFNM Show - 22 scenes
College Rules - 85 scenes
Brandi Belle - 199 scenes Busty Adventures - 156 scenes Haze Her - 54 scenes
MyGF - 179 scenes
Culineros - 450 scenes Public Invasion - 212 scenes
I'll mention here that Culineros, from the best I can tell and I'm dipping deep in my memory, these almost all look amateur Latina models. The content is very similar to what we used to find on Pacino's Adventures and is probably worth a join just for its content if you're into Latina.
I found the Public Invasion content to be rather tame, there's some risky content, but most of it looks like two people having sex in their backyard.
There's a downside here. This content isn't the newest technology, so the video quality can vary, but all the scenes I've looked at have at least a 720p option.
I think the upgrade is one of those that if you're into these niches and genres, you'll easily get your money's worth with a one month membership. I do think it's questionable for anyone looking for the newest resolution and professional camera/video work.
I'll end with the question I had: If you're a member of Bang Bros then add this upgrade, the upgrade does NOT end when your Bang Bros membership ends. You still sign in through Bang Bros, but you only see the sites in this network, which honestly, kind of surprised me. I was mainly joining to add some of the content lost in a hard drive crash, but did download a total of over 200 scenes, which is more than I've downloaded from a site in a long time. Definite recommend, but only one month.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Unique niche. Other sites may do public shoots but they're usually shot guerrilla style. Public Disgrace stages elaborate shoots with many bystanders.
- Almost 450 videos each approx. 1 hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about 1 hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Allows download managers
- Extreme action models are spit on, written on, called names, etc. (this could just as easily have gone in the Cons for how extreme it is)
- Never the same thing twice. They have a huge amount of variation within this topic
- Frequently updates - usually once per week.
Cons:
- You need to suspend your disbelief a little bit. For example they may be shooting on a bus but it's the same "extras" each time
- Many (maybe ⅓) sites are international - I prefer English so this can be a distraction
- More expensive than most sites (although with excellent production and a wide array of models you are getting what you pay for)
- Poor organization. Tags don't help much- many shoots don't have extensive tags. There is a search bar but you pretty much have to know what you want to find something. Casually browsing by topic/interest is nearly impossible
- cross sells inside the member side
- A lot of talent that I've never seen before (this could just as easily be a Pro)
Bottom Line:
As part of the kink network this is some of the premiere BDSM content on the web. I know this site isn't exactly BDSM - but it has that feel.
If you are interested I highly recommend looking at their previews 1st. Previews run a minute and a half to 2 minutes and give you a good idea of the action. A lot of this was more intense than my interest.
All in all a solid site I would recommend it, even with the high pricing.
A lot of the shoots start with a girl being stripped outside and walking around before she goes to a "public" place to be gang banged. The "public" place may be a shop/bar/restaurant/bus/whatever. It seems like the windows are done one way so you see people walking past - but since they have no reaction to what's happening inside I'm guess there's some film magic going on.
Of all the public sites this is the one that is the most explicit - I read somewhere that they shoot overseas because the public indecency laws are different that here in the states. It does make for some hot action.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Download speeds are excellent
- Newer (see cons) videos are reasonable quality, 1080p mp4 is the highest quality available
- 108 scenes available
- Photos and screencaps zipped
- Camerawork and lighting is generally good, although given the genre, it can be a bit jumpy
- Unique genre, don't recall having come across a site like this before
- A very diverse set of women present in most videos, including body type and ethnicity
- There are some attractive women in the videos
Cons:
- Affiliated with Bang Bros, suspect billing practices, see reviews and comments of that site for more
- Site is dead, last update is listed as October, 2015
- File sizes are large. Many of these videos are very long, ~60 minutes or more, so at 1080p they can get very big
- Streaming starts instantly
- Limited download options on many videos, most are just mp4
- In a lot of the videos, the most attractive women (at least to me) don't participate
- Not a big deal, but the music is terrible, I know they are supposed to be strippers, but god it is aweful
- Pretty expensive for what you get
Bottom Line:
I honestly didn't think I would find this site very appealing, but it is sort of interesting, and I did end up keeping more scenes than I thought I would. The basic concept is a male stripper shows up at some party, sexual hijinks ensue. Most of the scenes involve more than one male stripper, and a large number of women (probably 10-30 on average), although in the scenes with many women, many do not participate in the action, and some appear to be genuinely uncomfortable. The general setup is a stripper shows up, gets near instantly nude (not a very good stripper if you ask me, what is wrong with a little titillation for your clients), proceeds to get blown by some of the women present, sometimes has sex, he gets off. In most scenes a few more strippers will show up following the same pattern. In some, a costumed bear shows up and follows the same pattern.
It is an interesting site, and perhaps worth joining if this particular scenario is one that excites you, personally I find it a bit unrealistic and at times awkward and uncomfortable, even for porn. Having talked to many women about bachelorette parties, the general consensus seems to be that most don't like getting dicks waved in their faces, and would definitely not start just blowing the guy. Regardless, it can be a sort of fun site, but bear in mind if you join that it hasn't updated in almost a year, and I sort of doubt it will start again soon. The other major con is its affiliation with Bang Bros, so if you do decide to join, please be very careful in doing so, and consider getting a new card number soon after.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that I always seem to return to. Thought it would be a good choice to get my 500th experience point here on PU.
- It's a site that can't really be explained by just a simple title like "Public Disgrace".
- Around 360 full scenes, videos and photos for all the scenes.
- You'll see scenarios used in the scenes that you've probably thought about and some that you'll start thinking about.
- Site works well, but it's also pretty basic, scroll, download, scroll, download. Using the navigational buttons isn't much help.
- Like all other Kink sites it has very high production values. These people aren't just shoving out some scene that looks like the last 100 updates.
- Great download speeds. I'm averaging 8 MB/s, most sites I download from only reach 6 MB/s and 6 MB/s is my average.
- One new scene per week.
- Some very long scenes if you like that.
- Lots of outdoors and public scenes.
Cons:
- Believe it or not, I wanted to give it a 100, something I've never done. Thought it would go good with reaching 500 experience points. Something I never thought I was possible. But there's no zip downloads for the pictures and that's been a big no-no for me for years. Took 4 points off for it.
- Took another point off for the disgrace part. I've always struggled with the disgracing of men or women. But only took 1 point off since the site is named Public Disgrace. I knew what I was getting into.
Bottom Line:
I don't think any site works for me in the ways Public Disgrace does. I'll have a little fun with this part. A big part of my enjoyment of porn has to do with the fantasy aspect of it. This fantasy could be me being one of the random guys standing around watching the scene being filmed in an adult video store (do those even exist anymore?) to my self-abusive side imagining my wife (girlfriends in the past) being the woman in the scene. Neither one is particular healthy, but I do need this type of change from mainstream porn scenes.
I always turn to the Kink sites to break my boredom with mainstream porn. The good part with Public Disgrace is it only updates once a week so if you have the hard drive space, you can catch up with every past scene then just join sporadically to pick up the new updates.
What you're getting here is the closest thing I know of to public sex. I've tried the ones going for the more realistic belief (spy cams, voyeur cams, security cams), but I'm able to convince myself on most of Public Disgrace's scenes being authentic. I find it easier to convince myself than trying to watch those green shaded cam videos. So there's the funny part about me and my interest in this site. It lets my fantasies feel realistic.
I guess if a person wanted to nitpick they could say there's no 1080p videos and if there are, I've not found them. The newest updates highest option available is 720p. Bitrates are very high at 5,000+ so they stretch pretty cleanly to a 1080p screen/monitor.
And I will always nitpick about zip downloads for picture sets. I feel strongly about this on a site that is shot mostly in public. Videos work good, but photos let you see not only the action, but also the people in the background, their expressions, reactions, things you most likely miss in videos.
The disgrace part isn't as bad as a I remembered it being. I still see a lot of it as immature. Kind of makes you think you're watching Bang Bros, but instead of goofy/annoying college frat boy talk from the cameraman and crew, you get people writing on the woman's body. Could live without claiming to disgrace a woman by having her have sex in front of a crowd. That part to me is also an insult to the members of the site since I'm supposed to assume the model is disgraced.
As for public sex and nudity, they could do just that and I'd be happy. I feel like porn these days has become too vanilla and predictable. There's nothing predictable about a girl suddenly bending over in a bar and spreading her butt for anal sex in front of 200 people.
A strong suit of Kink's is that they know the models who are capable of doing this type of porn and it shows in the scenes. Just like in regular life, we all have different fetishes and dislikes. I think the majority of Kink's models love doing these types of unique scenes. I'm guessing most have an exhibitionist side that feels holed up by 127 scenes of them having bed or couch porn sex. You get some really great, genuine scenes here thanks to that.
There's also some added mystery and intrigue to the scenes. For example: A 22 year old college girl being tied up outside for sex with four men. Only comes an older man and she starts giving him a blowjob while the other four men take turns with her. Is it because she's getting paid to give the blowjob or is it that she got that horny over the four men taking turns with her? You don't get that with the vast majority of porn sites.
I've said it many times before. There's something to be said for being different and original. I'm not for sure if new porn fans would really be into these scenes. Sometimes there's 10-15 minutes of build-up before there's any sex. It kind of reminds me of going from reading a magazine to reading a Hemingway novel. It's definitely not for everyone just like Hemingway isn't for everyone.
I was surprised by the near my max download speeds and it was on all scenes I downloaded. It's needed as some of the scenes go over 2 GB.
Everything else was as expected. Lots of pretty (many tattoos) girls doing things that go beyond a girl doing just regular porn. That's a major turn-on for me and no site does it better. On the downside, there are times I won't even look at Public Disgrace for 3-4 days. Either way, it's a great site that sometimes will push things a little further than I think they should. I would recommend it to anyone who's looking for a site that is nearly guaranteed to be different than any porn you are watching right now. And just remember, let your fantasies require realism. They might be opposites, but if you can do that with this site you'll probably like it as much as I do.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Epoch is the payment processor. A trusted name.
-Professionally shot videos: good camera work, sound control, editing, lighting, etc.
-Good download speeds. I averaged between 1 to 3 MB/sec.
-There is a photo set illustrating/accompanying each scene, that shows you clearly what the video scene will show.
-Can stream or download each video. Each stream or download has choices for the quality of the scene. From mobile to HD quality.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
-No zip file for the photo sets.
-Poor search engine.
Bottom Line:
65 scenes
Features Japanese models in outdoor sex: in the street, at a pool, at the beach, at a park, wherever.
This would approximate the public nudity category for American/European porn.
Since there are only 65 scenes, this is a small site, and the content can be easily scanned by glancing over the thumbnail for each scene, with the brief scene description.
Even though 65 scenes seems like a small amount of content, you get a nice array of sex acts: masturbation, toys (vibrators and dildos), girl-girl, boy-girl, two-or-more-boys with one girl, blowjobs, fucking, etc.
The models are attractive young Japanese in their late teens or early twenties. Very little tattoos or piercings. Most models have pubic hair. Although the Japanese models exhibit the Asian shyness toward sex, it is evident they are enjoying the sex, with their funny noises and moans. The sex is not rough or abusive. And the girls seem to give blow jobs like they are born to it.
Because you haven't seen these models before, it adds an element of freshness to the scenes, even if the sex is not radically different from American or European sex scenes. Except:
1. the flavor is different, because these are Japanese models, which have a slightly different attitude to sex.
2. the models are Japanese, not European or American.
3. most of the models are cute or attractive. Slender bodies. Young faces.
4. no plastic breasts that I could see. These models are natural.
Some of the models, like Misaki Oosawa, have such innocent, doll-like faces, with perky bodies, that you wonder why they got into porn in the first place. I guess there's an excess of cute Japanese models that can't succeed in the gravure niche so they gravitate into AV idols (AV = Adult Video).
I think Japanese (and Chinese) models are some of the most beautiful women in the world.
Giving the site a score of 80. Because I really like how attractive some of the models are. But if you are less impressed by the models, you could easily give the site a lower score. I realize I am being very subjective about the score for this site. And I've read comments that the sex could be considered bland or raunchy. Different people can have very different opinions about this site, or about anything else, for that matter.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
