Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » What I hate about porn
51-58 of 58 Posts < Previous Page 1 Page 2
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

12-27-10  12:08pm - 5109 days #51
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by pat362:


I`ll have to disagree with you on Micheal`s popularity. No one in power is laughing at him. There is no denying that the man makes tons of money for the studios and in Hollywood thats all that counts.`

As for Megan`s talent or lack of. If she hadn`t opened her big mouth about Micheal then she would still be in the 3rd Transformer movie and as a result of that she would still be getting calls from other studios as well. We seem to think that Hollywood is very big place but it`s a much smaller community and sometimes the toes you stepped on were in some way connected to the feet of many other people. It`s for sure that if Micheal Bay black list you then studios that want to do business with him will also black list you.


I agree because I have heard and read many times that if someone pisses off someone powerful enough in Hollywood then the whole town knows about it almost instantly. Granted very powerful actors have more leeway in being douchebaggery and dickheadness but that may just be the absolute power corrupts absolutely thing.

Bottom line is it helps to make with the nice-nice and not be a dick to your employers. And given that she does not (yet...?) have a reputation for being an indispensable talent beyond a pretty face then it would probably help if she had a better attitude. I hate Michael Bay as much as the next person but he makes an enormous amount of money for the studio and that means a lot more than a twenty-something girl's whiny opinions. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

12-27-10  12:22pm - 5109 days #52
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
Hey, Pat,

Give Arnie his due.

He did a first class robot!

Rather puts me in mind of the 'John Wayne' school of acting.

John Wayne as John Wayne in... 'Insert title here'.

Don't get me wrong, I liked his films, but....

He was always John Wayne.

Didn't do him any harm either, though did it?

Cap'n. Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

12-27-10  04:58pm - 5109 days #53
hodayathink (0)
Active User

Posts: 312
Registered: Mar 27, '09
Location: Illinois
Originally Posted by pat362:


I`ll have to disagree with you on Micheal`s popularity. No one in power is laughing at him. There is no denying that the man makes tons of money for the studios and in Hollywood thats all that counts.`

As for Megan`s talent or lack of. If she hadn`t opened her big mouth about Micheal then she would still be in the 3rd Transformer movie and as a result of that she would still be getting calls from other studios as well. We seem to think that Hollywood is very big place but it`s a much smaller community and sometimes the toes you stepped on were in some way connected to the feet of many other people. It`s for sure that if Micheal Bay black list you then studios that want to do business with him will also black list you.

In any case talent is often overated for many movies. Just look at Arnold. He was a able to parlay a role as a cyborg into a multi-million dollar career and no one will ever accuse him of being a good actor.


You're really giving Bay too much credit here. He makes popcorn movies that gross a lot of money, but also cost a ton of money to make and a ton of money to promote. I seriously, seriously doubt he has as much clout in Hollywood as you think he does. And doing the third Transformers movie wouldn't have made her phone ring any more than doing the second one did. Which was just enough to land a starring role in exactly one movie (Jennifer's Body, which didn't do all that badly). When it comes to someone like her (who can't act), girls who can act get all the better roles she could have gotten, and all the roles where you just need someone to look pretty, she's a big enough star that they can easily find someone else to do it cheaper than her (like, for example, Rosie Huntington-Whitley). She wouldn't have been "destined for bigger things" if she hadn't opened her mouth, because she never was. Edited on Dec 27, 2010, 05:01pm

12-27-10  06:22pm - 5109 days #54
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


Hey, Pat,

Give Arnie his due.

He did a first class robot!

Rather puts me in mind of the 'John Wayne' school of acting.

John Wayne as John Wayne in... 'Insert title here'.

Don't get me wrong, I liked his films, but....

He was always John Wayne.

Didn't do him any harm either, though did it?

Cap'n.


Don't get me wrong. I love most Arnie movies and the same goes for John Wayne. I won't compare the 2 because John goes back to the hey days of Hollywood studios and the rules were slightly different back then. I agree that John wayne was always John Wayne in his movies just like Arnie and I'd dare say Tom Cruise in most of his films as well.

I'm just saying that if Arnie had taken a major crap on his movie(s) and the director then there would have been a permanent line across his name instead of below it. Long live the Brown Coats.

12-27-10  06:47pm - 5109 days #55
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by hodayathink:


You're really giving Bay too much credit here. He makes popcorn movies that gross a lot of money, but also cost a ton of money to make and a ton of money to promote. I seriously, seriously doubt he has as much clout in Hollywood as you think he does. And doing the third Transformers movie wouldn't have made her phone ring any more than doing the second one did. Which was just enough to land a starring role in exactly one movie (Jennifer's Body, which didn't do all that badly). When it comes to someone like her (who can't act), girls who can act get all the better roles she could have gotten, and all the roles where you just need someone to look pretty, she's a big enough star that they can easily find someone else to do it cheaper than her (like, for example, Rosie Huntington-Whitley). She wouldn't have been "destined for bigger things" if she hadn't opened her mouth, because she never was.


I truly believe that Bay has that much power and it's exactly why you don't think he does. I agree with you that he makes popcorn movies that cost over a hundred millions to make but the studios probably make billions with his movies. Not at the box office so much as DVD's and all the merchandising dollars that are sure to come their way. The only thing important In Hollywood is money. If your films make more money than they cost to make and market than someone will gladly produce your next project. The bigger the returns the greater the amount is for your next project.

I don't think Megan is a great actress. I'd be willing to say that she's a pretty good one, but The Transformers movies didn't require a great actress anyway. She did two projects between the first Transformers and the second one and 3 projects after the second movie. I'd say that without her appearance on both Transformer movies that she wouldn't have had any projects. Time will tell if she has any kind of future in Hollywood. Sooner or later she'll have to audition for roles and if we don't see her in anything then we'll know that she pissed off the wrong guy. Long live the Brown Coats.

12-27-10  07:40pm - 5109 days #56
JBDICK (0)
Active User



Posts: 160
Registered: Apr 04, '08
Location: Wales, UK
What I hate about porn...
It is so 2 dimensional.

...Okay, we are almost there with 3 dimensional.

...I'm looking forward to 4 dimensional where I can reach into the video and feel the action.

...Or how about 5 dimensional where I can reach into the video and taste the action.

What I hate about porn...
Is it's so available and unavailable at the same time.

I want to walk away from my PC with the smell of fish on my fingers it's so real.

What I hate about porn...
I know I will never be satisfied fully, because my addiction tells me the next video, next photo, next increase in HD/HI-RES, next young tight butt, tight pussy, tight babe is going to be better than the last one.

What I hate about porn...
Is that it is so real now it is unreal.

BUT like any LOVE HATE relationship, it is EXCITING... Beautiful Girls Covered in Pearls and No Oysters in Sight

12-28-10  07:10am - 5108 days #57
jberryl69 (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,000
Registered: Nov 27, '10
Location: neverland
Originally Posted by JBDICK:



What I hate about porn...
I know I will never be satisfied fully, because my addiction tells me the next video, next photo, next increase in HD/HI-RES, next young tight butt, tight pussy, tight babe is going to be better than the last one.

What I hate about porn...
Is that it is so real now it is unreal.

BUT like any LOVE HATE relationship, it is EXCITING...


Yes, what is it about porn that makes you feel that way? I find my interest lagging on scenes I watched three years ago that really excited me then - more new better (?) different. Porn seems to be like that. If it ain't grits, it must be a Yankee.

If you're going to lay her head over the pool table and fuck her throat, get your fucking hand off her throat!

12-30-10  05:35am - 5106 days #58
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Well, another thing that gets me all hissy-pissy is bad shot composition! So it's not just tucking the model's head in one corner and her butt in the other.

One of the worst for composition -- though not thoroughly bad -- is Aziani. Their 4th gallery of Eden Adams is a good example as it is full of compositional blunders. What are they aiming to shoot, her or the flowers in the tree above? There are shots where she looks as though she just happened on the scene of a fire department cat rescue. Hell, I'm no photographer, but even I can compose a shot better than that. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

51-58 of 58 Posts < Previous Page 1 Page 2
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.