Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Monahan (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (348)  |   Threads Started (12)

1-50 of 352 Posts Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Page >

07-25-18  10:57pm - 2341 days #12
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Amanda:


Hi guys! Sorry for the delay! It was a holiday weekend in these here parts.

I am submitting a ticket to our engineering team to look into this. I've keep you all apprised of how it's going.

Many thanks for your patience.


Can I assume that the poll feature is no longer functioning? Edited on Jul 27, 2018, 05:07pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-22-18  05:33pm - 2374 days Original Post - #1
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA

I have been trying to vote in the PU polls but my vote doesn't record. What am I doing wrong?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-17-17  02:44pm - 2806 days #6
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Bit8:


...Wow. Do you mean 79.99$ per year or 79.99$ for 4 year subscription? that's crazy... where did you got subscription like that? Even if it's 79.99$ a year I didn't know you could buy multiple years at once...
z

The $59.99 deal was a Christmas Special good for 24 hours. I was skeptical but figured I'd blow $60 for dinner at a nice restaurant so why not sign up and see what happens. So far I've had 3+ months of total access which calculates out at $20 per month to a site I'd probably have signed up for anyway.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-03-17  11:53am - 2820 days #2
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Having been a member, off and on, of both Brazzers and Reality Kings for many years, I suggest that you join each site for ust one month to get a good idea which one suits your tastes and interests. Both sites are, in my opinion, excellent and both are getting better.

I am currently on a very long term (until 2021) member of Brazzers that cost me $79.99 and am quite happy with the deal.

A caution to you. There's a trend among some of the most venerable sites to converting to streaming only with downloads being available only upon payment of an additional fee (or membership).

I am also a month-to-month member of Reality Kings (at a 50% discount). However I will probably cancel just because I don't have time to have fun with two mega-sites at the same time.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-30-17  09:50pm - 2823 days #162
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		How about long labia babes? They call themselves a niche site (oh really!)

Here's the URL longlabiababes.com
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-24-17  04:59pm - 2857 days #155
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Another site that needs a review by TBP is All Fine Girls (aka 18 only girls), part of the Diesel (Wow Girls)group.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-27-16  01:20pm - 2917 days #14
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by bibo:


It is not exactly a secret that downloading streams is possible these days. All it takes is one google search.

But even if circumventing the stream-only restriction via download add on's is legally delicate, it doesn't stop here.
What if you do not actually download the stream, but create a screen capture? Not that this is in any way practical or anything, but the legal aspect is interesting.

The discussion of the legality of downloading streaming only material reminds me of the good old days of VHS rentals where porn producers couldn't be bothered employing copy protection so folks could dub over the "good stuff" via a second VCR with no difficulty.

Similar protection is currently available to the websites that offer stream only stuff but the cost to the site apparently makes it not worth the trouble.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-27-16  01:01pm - 2917 days #126
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by merc77:


I also would like to thank Amanda and the staff at Porn Users for their generosity. I enjoy writing reviews to help others decide on what sites are worth joining. They are the ones who made this site what it is.


I agree completely. Since I joined PU several years ago I have never signed up for a site without first reading the reviews on PU and TBP.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-04-16  03:19pm - 3184 days #35
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


^ I'm fine with one thread as I often check out all the sites except the ones that I'm obviously not into. I appreciate you asking us, but I'd vote for whatever is easiest for you.


Ditto that. I like the single thread approach more than separate threads by genre but I don't feel strongly about that. Whatever is easiest for you works for me.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-27-16  05:09pm - 3220 days #43
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by badandy400:


Nice LPee
Now just do not get excited and pee on it.
My first 400 GB drive was $200


My first external HDD were 30Gb and 40 Gb. They set me back $100, and both gave up the ghost after about 1-1/2 years. They are now very useful as paperweights.

My question for LPee is, are you available to set me up with 20 Tb of storage accessible via Wifi? (I just saw a 3Tb available at $89.99 plus tax. Right now I can use that 3 Tb space (barely) but those super hi def videos are just getting larger.) Edited on Feb 28, 2016, 10:52am
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-19-16  10:25am - 3229 days Original Post - #1
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA

California stops rule for condoms for porn productions. Believe it or not, protective eyewear was also part of the regulation.

Here's a link to the article in today's paper:

http://www.dailynews.com/social-affairs/20160218/porn-industry-wins-battle-against-california-regulators-over-condoms-eyewear-on-film-shoots
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-24-15  03:36pm - 3439 days #14
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Just to add to some of the earlier comments...

I agree with all of the plaudits directed to Khan. He's set a professional tone to everything and is quickly responsive to all postings that need a response whether the post is here in the forum or somewhere else such as a reply to a review or a poll question.

I've referred to TBP as the Consumer Reports of the porn industry and the review section the Yelp. I've learned a lot from this site and have saved big bucks by avoiding crummy sites and fraudulent practices.

One possible new feature that I'd love is a news column that would discuss what's new in the business and an editorial commentary discussing issues of the day with opinions of your staff. (Good ideas for expanded discussions are easily found in the replies to polls and comments that appear in reviews, etc.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-25-15  06:44pm - 3467 days #39
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by biker:


... I just have a problem because some performers work for more then one website and it is hard to remember which site a set originated from.

Sounds like what I'm doing. The only minor difference is that I create sub-files for each female. I use Win 7 as well.

In other words, all videos go to My Videos, a folder in My Documents that collects all videos I download.

Then I create the individual model folders with a sub-folder for the site.

Example...

My Documents
...My Videos
......Mandy Dee
.........DDF
.........Met Art
.........21 Sextury

I don't set up the genre in the folder structure.

I use Down Them All where it's very easy to create the sub-folders when setting the download. Example: My Documents\My Videos\Mandy Dee\MetArt downloads the file directly to the correct folder.

I'm a video guy, but occasionally I download video sets. In those cases I create yet another sub-folder; Photos.

By the way, I use an exclamation point (!) rather than an X to notate "special" files because the explanation point always places the file first when alphabetizing. Edited on Jun 25, 2015, 06:49pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-02-15  11:40am - 3583 days #10
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by biker:


I have not run into that. I mainly stick to DDf and 21stSextuary. They have the best photography I've come across. I expect they won't tamper with their exceptional work. I do visit Reality Kings, but not nearly as often. I hope they haven't changed.


It's a problem with many of the "softer" sites like Met Art, ALS Scan and so on. Not so much with the hardest of hard core sites.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-01-15  09:29pm - 3583 days #14
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by LPee23:


No denying that the overabundance of free content on tubes is the main factor in declining membership sales.

At the same time, tubes are somewhat of a self-made problem for the industry. First webmasters bought traffic from TGP's and MGP's, and now it's tubes. The difference is that storage and bandwidth are so cheap now that tubes can and do host a glut of free content, and they are not policed well for copyright enforcement.

I think AWPress is right that if you download a few videos that aren't for sale anymore from tubes it is probably a case of no harm no foul. At the same time though, many of the sites that have closed in recent years might still be around if not for piracy on the tubes.

I would prefer a world without tubes, if it would have meant that a few more studios could have stayed open.


Not that simple. The quality of most tube material is usually inferior. Also many major websites (Twistys, Mofos, Bang Bros, Brazzers, Reality Kings, etc.) use tubes to promote themselves with sample content in disguise so rather than pining over what tubes are doing, they are taking the opportunity to promote their sites using tubes.

Those guys are staying up with the times, and quite well, in my opinion.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-01-15  09:19pm - 3583 days #15
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		My faves are (were) Susanne Brecht, Nancy Suiter, Raquel Darrien, Angel (1980's babe), Mia Malkova, Cosima Dunkin and Jenna Doll.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-01-15  11:21am - 3584 days #766
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by elephant:


Oh right. Thanks for the info Khan. The site looks quite good now to be honest I was tempted to join then noticed it was featured here so wanted to see why.

That could be a problem. The site looks great with some good stuff, but without any upticks by TBP/PU, I'm not willing to drop $29.99 to find out the site is no longer updated and/or has crappy servers that make downloading a pain in the butt.

If the site is really good, they will satisfy the TBP folks that they have emerged from bankruptcy and are fully back in business.

Be patient.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-06-15  05:37pm - 3606 days #35
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by LPee23:


When you're doing manual backups, you should run chkdsk or the utility of your choice on your backup disc before updating it, especially if it has been a while.

I just caught a bad disc like this. It was a backup 4Tb Western Digital drive that I hadn't updated in about a year, and I was going to re-purpose it as a primary since my collection has grown and I don't have any empty drives on hand. Luckily I checked it first, otherwise the data on the primary might have been corrupted.

Now it's time to order more drives.


Absolutely correct.

I have two 2 Tb externals that I use. They are mirror images.

Also, a great time to get some additional hard drives; the prices are quite low.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-19-14  09:43pm - 3685 days #758
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by pat362:


^I see it differently because if TBP/PU list the site than they are in fact supporting what I consider to be a scam site. You may have a different opinion of what a scam site is but mine is simple. If a site (like yours) which does not show a join price anywhere on their preview section and actually goes out of it's way to make it appear as though it's free than it's scamming people.

Why not choose a site with similar content that TBP shows as being active to talk about instead of trying to get a site that looks fishy reinstated.


I agree with Pat. The PU/TBP site has four levels of business practice notifications:

1. No comments or warnings - I interpret this as no indication of bad practices by the site. (A solid green light)

2. Cross check warnings - I interpret this as a no indication of bad practices by the site except the caution to a member of the site to be aware of cross checked options appearing in the signup process. (A flashing yellow (caution) light)

3. Posting of a site but no evaluations and a notice that TBP does not accept the business practices of the site - I interpret this as acknowledgement of the site but that TBP will not go any further. (A flashing red light (stop and check the situation before proceeding))

4. Not posting a site (such as the one under discussion) - The site fails in one or more respects to qualify for inclusion on the site - I interpret this as being a loud and clear signal that the site should be avoided. (A do not enter sign)

That's why I find PU/TBP to be superior to any of the other review sites and what makes this thread useful in addressing sites that are new or are reactivations of previously dormant sites.

That's also why, in my opinion, a site like AmericanKittens.com with its current business practices should not be included in the PU site unless and until it uses legitimate business practices. Edited on Nov 19, 2014, 09:53pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-17-14  02:01pm - 3688 days #751
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by pat362:


^I don't think pretending to be drunk is illegal per say but I certainly wouldn't want to be the company who shot those types of scenes if they don't also happen to have a video of the girl saying that it's all pretend after the scene/ Otherwise an enterprising young lady with a lawyer could take those fools to court by saying that she wasn't pretending and that she was drunk and they took advantage of her.


I was able to access the site and watched the preview loop. Good quality video, but that's about the only positive thing I can say about it. But that's a personal perspective. I don't get the drunk thing, a girl who is totally skunked isn't my idea of a sexy babe in a sexy scene.

In any case, as I always say different strokes for different strokers.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-16-14  11:24am - 3689 days #746
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


Sorry, I asked an editor to take a look and, as Pat predicted, they declined to re-list since the site says it's only opening memberships until Dec 1st.

You can still discuss it if you'd like.

Sorry I couldn't help more.


FWIW, I went to this site's URL yesterday and saw the offer that goes away on 12/1/14. I bookmarked it so I could check it out when I had more time. When I came back the link didn't work, so I assume that the site is closed to new business already.

Also worthy of note, the headline on the site had a comment that it was rated #1 by Rabbits Reviews. Rabbits Reviews has nothing at all on WDGirls.com.

Looks to be like this site is flaky (why else will they close enrollments?) and, contradictorily, is willing to prevaricate in its promotional material.

I think I will give these guys a wide berth and wait until they choose to go mainstream, if they do, and see what TBP has to say when (if) TBP does a review.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

09-06-14  12:06am - 3760 days #683
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		TessaFowler.com

She's got great knockers and apparently just created a new website.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-06-14  11:06pm - 3790 days #16
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


1. A site's TBP listing page will tell you who the current owner is.

2. A site's TBP listing page (under Content Updates) will tell you the last time a site updated.


1. Yes, but there's no way to know when a change occurs and who the previous owner was.

2. Didn't know that but I do now! That's a great feature. Might be a good idea for me to spend more time reading everything first.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-05-14  04:26pm - 3792 days #14
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Good idea, but two thoughts.

1. With the virtual destruction of Twistys.com by the site's new owner. But it continues as if it's the same terrific site. What would be great would be an ownership change report on PU or TBP.

2. With many sites becoming dormant or nearly dormant with few if any new updates, it would be a great addition to the site facts page of TBP to indicate the dormancy and, if there's any back story info available, whether it will be rejuvenated.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-23-14  07:57pm - 3865 days #70
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Not being a tekki but being a part of management where I work, I must applaud the patience and thoroughness these guys are putting in.

There always is the temptation to show the world all the wonderful things developed and to "show off" a bit.

I love the concept, all too often lacking in web development, of let's do it right the first time.

The sign in my office says, " whu is it we never have time to do it right the first time but always have time to go in the second time and fix the mistakes?"
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-09-14  09:51am - 4000 days #7
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by biker:


I don't join unless it is through TBP. Someone sends me an Email. I just ignore it. I get these specials about once a month. Please return. We have a bargain for you. Special discount. It is all the same BS.


Ditto that. Whenever I get any super duper special offer from any site I immediately go to TBP and PU and check it out. If it's not listed, I'm gone. If it is listed I read the reviews and comments before I even go to the site.

So far only a small number of these sites show up on TBP/PU, and those that do are reported to be dormant.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-09-14  09:45am - 4000 days #10
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		I really like the new layout and am looking forward to it because it pulls in everything I use the site for (except the forum...which should be separate anyway).

My one concern is that stuff is added to the new site just for "wowsie" and not for legitimate functionality. So far it doesn't look like "wowsie" is the objective.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-09-14  09:38am - 4000 days #18
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Interesting discussion. I've been a member of VideoBox for at least 8 years. Their monthly rate is $15.00 regular and $12.00 at PU's special rate.

VB posts 5 full DVD's per day, 365 days a year, which means a member gets access to an average of 150 full length videos per month, or 10 cents per video. The average video has five scenes so the rice per scene is $0.02. Yes, they do have some "crap" but at 2 cents per scene I('m fine with that, especially because they have a lot more superb stuff than "crap.".

jook's point is that his site Trike Patrol charges $30 per month for 4 or 5 updates, total. That's $5.00 to $7.70 per update, which I suspect is a single scene.

How does VB stay in business? I suspect that it's because they have a ton of subscribers; a direct result of their great price. Trike Patrol serves a special niche which means their stuff is probably high quality but it probably has a much smaller subscriber base.

That means Trike Patrol has to cover its costs with far fewer customers.

The economic concept is fixed vs variable costs. VB pays the same fees/royalties for its content whether they have 20 subscribers or 20,000. The only variable cost of significance is servers and bandwith, the cost of which varies by volume of activity.

That means VB makes more per $12 subscriber than Trike Patrol per $30 subscriber simply because VB's costs are spread over a much larger base than Trike Patrol's.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-17-13  08:48pm - 4052 days #9
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Some long term (more than one month) memberships where I felt the content was worth the price based on quality and frequency of updates are:

Twistys (mostly softcore and midcore with some hardcore)
DDF Network (mostly hardcore Eurobabes)
VideoBox (5 hardcore movie updates daily at a really low price)
MetArt (mostly photos, all softcore but superb quality)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-19-13  12:51am - 4235 days #94
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Here's Chandra West, a Canadian actress who appears in several TV shows and a few movies...but what a babe!


Edited on May 19, 2013, 12:55am Edited by Staff on May 19, 2013, 07:02am
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-11-13  02:34pm - 4243 days #2
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Good post. I have the same question. I've seen "tags" lately on sites that would be great for my collection (which is set up by model name with subdirectories for each model for the source).

But I have no idea how to create "tags" or even if I can. If I could "tag" I would do it by genre (solo, b/g, bj, etc.) by alias(es) and by charachteristics (big naturals, anal, etc.) Edited on May 12, 2013, 08:56am
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-06-13  10:45pm - 4247 days #1102
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


When I was in high school, I was taught that fiction is supposed to have internal consistency.

That was many years ago.

Since then, movies and comic books have evolved, to where internal consistency seems to be ignored at will. That is especially true in comic book and fantasy/sci-fi.

Although I think that internal consistency makes for a solid approach, I think most people don't give a hoot. They go to a movie to see amazing spectacles, gee-whiz action and explosions.


True. Major examples are each of the James Bond movies.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-06-13  08:47am - 4248 days #615
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Khan, thanks for checking.

Based on the preview sites for primecups.com and fistflush.com, two of DEV8's previously owned sites, it doesn't look like there have been any updates since 2009. However I like the quality of their stuff but couldn't afford the monthly charge. Now that they are finally offering all ten of their sites for a single price, I will sign up to drain what's there. I'll post a comment once I've done some exploration and have something to report.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-05-13  06:11pm - 4248 days #91
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by etna:


Isla Fisher and Melissa George.




Edited on May 05, 2013, 06:18pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-05-13  05:00pm - 4248 days #613
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Hey Khan,

Not really on topic but I just decided to go to Primecups.com, at one time operated by Dev8, that stopped updating back in 2009. They had several sites with similar site design and production techniques.

It appears that an outfit named perfectgonzo now owns & operates these sites and their join page says they offer access to all their sites for a single subscription. Dev8 never had a combo offer per se but they did offer a site that picked off several updates from each site at the standard $30 per month price.

My question is, have you ever heard of perfectgonzo and are they a trusted (by TBP) site operator?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-03-13  10:16pm - 4250 days #20
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by luv lickn clit:


Monahan, I'm guessing you're not a current member at Met-Art, because most of their sets do start fully clothed, and there are very few fully nude sets. I did a count on the last 80 sets (about 3 weeks worth), and 51 of 80 started with the girl clothed (no breasts or pussy showing). Are you thinking of Femjoy?

Despite the high percentage of intially clothed sets, the models typically lose the clothes fast, and there are very few good strip sequences. The photographer Antonio Clemens does the best job of photographing strip sequences.

Messmer, I also counted how many of the last 80 sets had panties. It was only 25 of 80, and maybe half of those had the full frontal shots you describe. Met-Art is a good site, but strip-tease and panties are not their forte.


You nailed it. I was a member of MetArt for over a year but dropped the site in early 2012. The primary reason I moved on was there were few shots with even lingerie in tease situations.

If they have changed their approach I may return.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-02-13  08:00am - 4252 days #89
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		And of course there's Brittney Spears.

Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-02-13  07:58am - 4252 days #88
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Don't forget Lindsay Lohan. [Although some might classify her as a porn star with this photo:
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-01-13  08:30am - 4253 days #607
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Here's another - a single model site...clubkatrin.com. It features a babe who has a range of names including Katrin Kozy, Kathy Kozy and Katrina Hartlova...and a great set of all natural hooters. Edited by Staff on May 01, 2013, 09:10am (Khan: direct link edited)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-28-13  11:24pm - 4255 days #13
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by messmer:


I am the same way, CT. That's why I've never subscribed to sites like MetArt because I assume they are mostly nude studies. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.


You are correct. Almost all of MetArt's photo sets start totally naked.

Me, Iove panties and especially when they are played with like a panty wedgie. Here's an example (Kathia Nobili):



I'm also into another use of panties...panty stuffing (Xena Wilkes):



Then there are crotchless panties (love them when the babe leaves them on whilst being porked):



And its cousin, a crotchless topless monokini:

Edited on Apr 28, 2013, 11:41pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-28-13  11:03pm - 4255 days #83
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Lindsey Vonn (Olympic skier and Tiger Wood's current main squeeze)



And, referring to CT's post (#82), Bob Hope had it right with his theme song, "Thanks for the Mammaries." Edited on May 02, 2013, 07:53am
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-27-13  10:51pm - 4256 days #79
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Heidi Klum



Megyn Kelly (Fox)

Edited on Apr 27, 2013, 11:34pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-26-13  11:12am - 4258 days #605
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		How about hitomi tanaka's site? She's the Japanese sensation with an absolutely incredible rack. Her site address is hitomitanakaxxx.com
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-03-13  01:18pm - 4312 days #592
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Actually that's great news. I was hoping the site was legit and had some quality. Based on the write-ups for Teasers VOD, I'm going to take the plunge.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-03-13  08:15am - 4312 days #590
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		Here's one that is not listed on PU.

bestpublicflashing.com/

The good news is that the preview site looks great and its biller is the always reliable EPOCH.com.

The bad news is that it looks like they became inactive in November 2011.

While I'm tempted to sign up for a month, I won't until I see some comments from PU members and/or TBP staff first. (Having been burned several times I no longer will sign up for any site "in the blind.") Edited by Staff on Mar 03, 2013, 08:24am (Khan: direct link URL edited/corrected)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-18-13  08:23am - 4325 days #27
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by graymane:



...STOP ... I said STOP ... saturating fuck scenes with so much closeups. The outrageous, absurd, nonsensical, extravagant time cameramen burn up with endless shots of this guy's balls and hairy ass atop a form whose only body part is the mound of a vagina ... simply blows the mind.

The scenes are perpetually starved for more angle shots, of which are so fleeting, because the dumb-ass behind the camera must hurriedly get back parking his lens on the same old balls-an'-ass closeup...



NAILED IT!!!

The rubber issue has become a big thing because of the amount of time the schlong appears as the primary object in a scene.

It's intuitive. Read the earlier posts that discuss condoms in gay porn and you get the message. Edited on Feb 18, 2013, 09:09pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-17-13  08:44am - 4326 days #21
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA 		I agree that this subject should be revisited. In the November 2012 election LA County voters passed an initiative that requires condom use in porn productions.

See: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/11/condoms-porn-county-enforce.html

The vast majority of US porn production activity is done in LA County with Miami coming in a distant second.

Being an LA taxpayer I would have preferred the initiative go down to defeat because the huge amount the porn industry pays in taxes presumably saves me paying even more than I do now.

But my feelings about condom use that I expressed a few years ago in this thread haven't changed one bit and I would hope that mine ultimately is the prevailing view.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-29-12  09:41am - 4376 days #549
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


Just a little followup on my previous reply (#519 above) ...

It looks lik this one has been relisted now. You may enter your remarks at:
https://www.pornusers.com/review/ilovebitties/

Hope that helps.


I just posted a note. Looks like the site is inactive. Still has promise for historical research for those of us working toward our PhD in Applied Mammary Sciences. ;->

(PhD = Piled high & Deep) Edited on Dec 29, 2012, 11:11am
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-11-12  03:33pm - 4424 days #532
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


This one is now added. You may enter your remarks at:
https://www.pornusers.com/review/rylskyart/

We'll look forward to seeing your review.


Strange thing. I went to the new TBP/PU home page for this site and the link to the site does not work. I then typed in rylskyart.com into my browser and the preview site popped in.

Looks like it may be as tame as MetArt.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

10-27-12  11:14am - 4439 days #520
Monahan (0)
Active User



Posts: 348
Registered: Jan 17, '07
Location: SF Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Khan:


That site used to be listed. The listing was pulled in June when our editors discovered the site was having some technical problems. We'll spot check the site from time-to-time and if/when the problems clear up, we'll reactivate the listing.

Hope that helps.


Yes, it does. I'll hang loose until you complete the check.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

1-50 of 352 Posts Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.

Loaded in 0.17 seconds.