Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: pat362 (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (3575)  |   Threads Started (31)

3251-3300 of 3575 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 12 22 32 42 52 65 Page 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 Next Page >

03-30-09  06:39pm - 5746 days #3
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I agree with exotics4me on liliane's site. Avoid like the plague. Any preview site that resembles that one is going to disapoint you.
If she's one of your favorite stars then videobox is a good start and then simply visit eurobabeindex and take a look at other sites that have her starring in certain scenes. As far as I know she does not have a site of her own. I do not belive the one you joined was actually run by her. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-29-09  09:34am - 5747 days #10
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I'd like to think that for the most part we can all be mature and reasonable when it comes to no-trust ratings. If I receive one than I will not automatically retaliate and give the poster a no-trust rating. I used to have 3 until this years new rules. All of them were anonymous. It's not fun, but I would have accepted them if they at least had a comment attached to them. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-29-09  09:27am - 5747 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I'm definetely a grab and leave type of customer. I've never joined a single site that made me want to stick longer than the basic one month membership. Although, I've never joined videobox or any other of these video downloading sites, I do agree with Denner that those would require a much longer membership than one month.

It's all a question of economics. I'm willing to spend "x" amount on porn and since most recuring memberships remain at the same price than why would I remain a member for so few new material. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-26-09  07:40pm - 5750 days #46
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by deanpro:


Paramount own the rights to the movies and the series. I'm assuming that they probably own everything else considering they have covered the major licenses.

I hated Enterprise, I thought it was totally pointless even though I did like the casting of Sam Beckett.

As for remaking the original series, it depends on how the new movie fares. Personally I'm not looking forward to the new Star Trek movie, it's the cast, they look too young to crew a galaxy-faring starship.


The only Enterprise episodes that I liked were eothei those with the Andorians (Mostly because I think Jeffrey Combs is a genius like Bruce Campbell), and the ones from the alternate universe. It was pure joy to finally see a Constitution Class Starship, like I always wanted to see one, in action. The writing still was crapy, but at least it made sense.

The actors do look young, but then again Star Trek was suppose to be mostly crewed by 20yrs old. I will reserve judgement on the movie until after I've seen it. I just hope that it's good enough to kick start the franchise. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-26-09  07:32pm - 5750 days #38
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


Yeah, they seriously changed the story for the Disney version. Hans Christian Andersen's version had her basically commit suicide because she would not slay the Prince and let his blood drip on her feet to turn her back into a mermaid. She instead she dissolves into the sea. Perhaps later gaining a soul and gaining entrance into the Christian heaven, or not, there is debate about that.

Anyway, being a musicals fan, I liked the songs much more in Disney's Little Mermaid as opposed to Beauty and the Beast. Or almost any of the following animated, musical features. Like that blasted Lion King. That was ridiculously overrated. Still, Disney can be fun, no doubt.


Unless you took English literature in College or just love reading very old books, then you aren't likely to realise how many fairie tales are dark and depressing. I've never had a problem with someone bringing sunshine and an Happy Ending to any Fairie Tale.

I'm sitting here trying to remember what happened to Cinderella's Stepmother and step-sisters. I know that it isn't has rose has Disney's version.

The only songs from Disney animated movies that I love are those from Aladin, Sleeping Beauty and Snow White.
I can struggle through the others, but I don't enjoy them. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-26-09  07:24pm - 5750 days #37
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


There was an episode of "Beauty" on Shelley Duvall's Faerie Tale Theatre. Starring Susan Sarandon and Klaus Kinski, based on Beauty and the Beast. On TV around 1984. I thought it was enjoyable. The entire series was quality entertainment for both children and adults, and lasted several years in the 1980s. The Beauty episode was not as sugary as the Disney version, Sarandon was lovely, and Kinski was Kinski.


There was also a version which starred Rebecca De Mornay and Jonh Savage(I've got the DVD). They weren't bad they certainly wouldn't be called very good. I liked Disney's version but I did not like any of the songs except "Be our Guest". Long live the Brown Coats.

03-26-09  07:19pm - 5750 days #36
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by deanpro:



Oh, a big shout out for that new Liam Neeson Spy-Film, 'Taken'. Although it's too early to say, Taken could be the best action movie I have ever seen. Seriously, it is that good, I wouldn't lie to you I swear!!!


I saw it twice in theater and I enjoyed both showing. It has more than a few plot holes, but that movie was quite entertaining. The biggest shock I got was when I realised just who the actress is that plays is 18yr old daughter.
26yrs old Maggie Grace. Fans of Lost will remember her has Shannon Rutherford. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-25-09  06:48pm - 5751 days #29
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


Beauty and the Beast (1991)? Really? I always felt that it got lots of attention because the Oscars overlooked The Little Mermaid (1989) a couple years earlier. It had much more memorable songs in my opinion :-)

In the realm of Disney, I'd also add Fantasia (1940) and Dumbo (1941). As highly disturbing as the latter is, it's still a damn good piece of art.


Of course, as GCode pointed out, Anime opens a whole realm of films too, though many I'd say are way overrated. None-the-less, I really enjoyed Ghost in the Shell (1995) and of course the epic Escaflowne TV Series (2000). Cowboy Bebop (1998) was good fun too, especially when it wasn't dubbed. I hate bloody dubbing. Hmmm, Vampire Hunter D (2000) was fun too. It is just important to think of Anime more as action movies and not get too hung up on the plot, otherwise you'll often get disappointed.


I didn't like "The Little Mermaid". In part, because I saw a previous version where the mermaid looses her voice and the prince. If I remember correctly she also dies of saddness. Mumm that sucks. That pretty much bumped me out for all subsequent versions.

I've always liked the story of Beauty and the beast. There have been so few versions made that I was glad they finally got around to making one. Of course the best is still the 1946 one with Jean Marais as the Beast.

I'm waiting for a Robotech movie. I know there was one last year, but that wasn't enough for me. I liked the Escaflowne series. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-25-09  06:22pm - 5751 days #11
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


Would Stalin prefer Evil Angel or Wicked? Inquiring minds want to know!

As to the quantity/quality thing, a lot of crap is crap.

A lot of good stuff is good.




It's obvious that Stalin would pick Evil Angel because they have more red in their banner.

I can't add anything since your 2 senyences have resumed pretty much what I think. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-25-09  06:16pm - 5751 days #9
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I agree with the need for sites to have the proper models name. Far too many sites alter the name of the performer for their own reasons.

I like the idea of a niche search option but can see a few issues with that. The site administrator(s) would have to be careful in properly tagging scenes. Because some scene might contain more than one niche then you would get multiple hits for the same scene. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-24-09  07:22pm - 5752 days #8
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by HotMandy:


But still need to know what is it that makes GREAT head? I appreciate the advice to ask him what he likes but I would prefer to just be able to give him the best blowjob of his life out of the blue you know? I have spoken to a few guys, but nobody has been too helpful yet! I have been told there is nothing worse than a bad blow job, (and im sure i dont give any of them) but think to the best blow job you have ever had..... what made it sooo good? xxxx


Hi Mandy. You worry too much about this. Let me preach a little before I offer some technique. To begin, it's a BJ
good or bad he's getting one. It's like offering someone 100$. Why bitch if it's all in 5$ bills?

All right now to technique. The first thing and this is by far the most important thing. You have to want to give him a great BJ. Regardless of anything else, if you don't like doing that then it will show. The best ones involve the use of both hands as well as the mouth. go slow, do not at any point use porn bj as reference. That means no choking, spitting, drooling, deep throathing to the point of vomiting(I hope you get the point). I recommend you look at his face and see how good you are doing. You should be able to see whether you need to change certain things. If he has stupid grin on his face then you are on the right track. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-24-09  07:09pm - 5752 days #24
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I don't think anyone has included a single animated movie.

Her goes
Cars
Aladin
Atlantis The lost Continent
Sleeping Beauty
Beauty and the Beast
Monster House
Shrek(the first and some of the second. That third one was a thurd).
Heavy Metal Long live the Brown Coats.

03-24-09  07:03pm - 5752 days #44
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I think there is a market for Star Trek. I know that I would glady watch a new series. I think that before they get too far into any kind of negatiation. They have to choose a time line. Once you have that then come up with a premise that makes sense and does not contradict anything that came before it. That was my big beef with Voyager. They would have space battle after space battle but each week the ship was tip top. All the preceeding series required the ship to go back to space dock, but not Voyager. Enterprise was also doomed because they invented an history that none of us knew existed.

I know this will never happen, but frankly I would be super happy if they simply remade all of the original epsiodes. All they need is a great cast because the writing is already done.

I wonder who owns the franchise now that Gene and Majel are both deceased?
If it's possble to get access to Long live the Brown Coats.

03-23-09  05:54pm - 5753 days #41
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
They are running out of possible scenarios because if the premise of SGU(Stargate Universe) is humans trapped on a spaceship in a far away galaxy where they can't return to Earth then you have just described Stargate Atlantis but instead of a city/spaceship on a planet it's spaceship in outersapce. Who am I kidding. I'll still watch it. It's not like there is tons of sci-fi on TV at the moment. I believe this is Smallville last season and frankly I can't say that I will miss all that much. That show is going nowhere. How about they just start making movies with the actor. It would make a lot more sense then having a 30yrs old pretending to still be in his early 20's. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-23-09  05:43pm - 5753 days #17
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Let me add a few more to the list:

To catch a Thief: Cary Grant and Grace Kelly. Might be nice to see a remake but knowing Hollywood they would only screw it up.

Charade: Cary Grant and Audrey Hepburn.

Sabrina: Audrey Hepburn and Humphrey Bogart.

The Fountain Head: Gary Cooper and Nancy Neal

People will talk: Cary Grant and Jeanne Crain

Hot Fuzz: Simon Pegg and Nick Frost.

Lake Placid: Bill Pullman and Bridget Fonda. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-22-09  07:18pm - 5754 days #4
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Thanks wittyguy. Another great subject. Some of my choices are a little obscure since they are older and sometimes not even on dvd or VHS.

Sci-Fi: Forbiden Planet(by far my favorite movie), Total Recall, Aliens, When Worlds Collide, The Black Hole, I Robot, Star Wars, Empire Strikes Back, Return of the Jedi, The Last Starfighter, Dark City.

Fantasy: The Lord of The Rings trilogy(extended version), all the Sinbad movies, Price Valiant, Excalibur, Jack the Giant Killer,

War: Full Metal Jacket, Where Eagles Dare, Platoon,

Romantic Comdies: It Started with Eve(amazing), Joe Versus the Volcano(possibly the best pairing of Tome Hanks and Meg Ryan), The Cutting Edge, Torrid Zone,

Comedies: Spaceball, Blazing Star, The Return of the Pink Panther, The Pink Panther Strikes Again,

Cowboy: Almost anything with Clint, John Wayne or Audi Murphy

Adventure: The Naked Jungle, King of The Khiber Rifles

Horror: The Fog(the original), Halloween, Alien, Coma

Medival time: Kingdom of Heaven(extended version)

Hard to claissify but still thought provoking: Charlie, Gattaca. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-22-09  08:49am - 5754 days #11
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


When a valuable membership becomes disabled, the least we should do is to raise a glass of beer or more potent brew in his honor.

I would include Drooler in that category of value-added PU perverts, along with many other worthwhile members.


An excellent suggestion. I raise my glass to all of those fallen comrades that have made PU what is is. May they be happy wherever they are. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-20-09  06:31pm - 5756 days #34
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


I'm a little skeptical on counting the old and new Dr. Who series as one. That opens up a slippery slope of counting relaunches and spin offs in other series -- i.e. Do you count original BSG, Galactica 1980 & the new BSG series as one show? What about future spin offs?

The original Dr. Who did run 20-something years though so it deserves props for that!


Battlestar Galactica is a tough one. In many ways it's not anything like the original series except that they use many of the same names. At first it was a retelling of the original story, but that didn't last much past the first season. After that it went in a much different direction. I'm a geek at heart so the space battles were interesting but the character development started to get messy and hard to follow. It blured the line between the good guys and the bad guys and it is guilty of a new kind of affliction. The need to kill off many characters for dubious reasons. I grew up watching a lot of TV shows and the one thing that was common to most of them was a code that said: We will not kill our charaters. That isn't the case with many shows today. I would even say that it is more and more prevalent to watch a show and after a few years having one of the main character bumped off.

The reasons why I consider the new Doctor Who as simply a continuation of all the preceeding ones is that it is essentially the same show. You have a Time Lord and his companion traveling through time and space to try to save humanity from itself and its enemies. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-19-09  07:33pm - 5757 days #32
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


How long did Doctor Who run? Are you counting the new series as a continuation? Stargate SG-1 racked up some years.


Yes, I include the new Doctor Who in my calculation. The Tardis is different on the inside, and the effect are much better. At the core it is still the Doctor, a companion and many of his old enemies.

Let's add Space 1999, UFO, Man from Atlantis and Red Dawrf.
I would love to see a remake of Space 1999. I thought the premise for that show was amazing. How about Space 2999.
The moon is now the reposostory of all nuclear misiles and bombs found on Earth. The nations of the world have finally decided that we do not need nuclear weapons and have created a space agency to manage these on the moon. The rest is predictable. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-19-09  07:21pm - 5757 days #8
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I've never been offered a free lifetime membership, so I can't be sure how I would deal with it. Since your original review was from a paying customer then that review is valid and acceptable. The problem is for a re-visiting of that site. I would like to think that I could be objective in any future review, but then again I am getting a free ride from the webmaster, so part of me would feel guilty about slamming that site. I'm not saying that you would, but I might.

Another problem with the free aspect is that I personally use the cost of a membership when giving a score. It's not the actual amount as much as what you get for that amount. I've paid 10$ for a site and thought that I was robed while I paid 45$ for another and thought that is was a bargain. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-19-09  07:06pm - 5757 days #5
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by HotMandy:


Hey Guys. I thought I would get a bit of discussion going (and some advice!) about blowjobs! As I have just got a new man I really want to drive him crazy with the best blow job ever... I have heard bonjela is really good (check the blog in my sig for more details) so would love feedback on this? Have any of the guys experienced it? Thoughts? Also any discussion about what makes head really good would be amazing. Thanks in advance xxxxx


My advice to you is be bold and ask him how he would like his blowjob. Afterall he is the one that you are trying to satisfy. That should surprise him and maybe start his juices going. If he's unwilling to mention anything then please do not use any modern porn movies as reference. I could be wrong but I don't believe he will enjoy hearing you chocking or seeing you drooling during the blowjob.

I can't speak about bonjela because I know nothing about that. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-19-09  06:50pm - 5757 days #3
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I'm sorry to hear about your problems zierbengel. What browser are you using? I remember having a problem when I was a member of that site. My problem wasn't the password as much as the verification.
I would type the correect letter but the system would not accept it.
It didn't last long, but then again I wasn't a member for 15 months.
I never had the patience to wait that long to get full access to all
their sites. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-18-09  06:58pm - 5758 days #28
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


(The Avengers and The Prisoner being the other 2). I also thoroughly enjoyed the Lost In Space series, which I am old enough to have watched first time round. Doctor Who and Torchwood are great too. Even though I loved the Star Trek and TNG series, they could be a bit sanctimonious at times.


I feel bad about forgetting Doctor Who. I could be wrong but if I'm correct. This is the longest running sci-fi show of all time. The creator was a genius. By giving the main character the ability to regenerate. That is the ability, at a chosen time or when near death, for the Doctor to regenerate into another character. He is still the Doctor but looks different(obviously) and they also explain why he acts differently as well. You have an endless supply of actors to play the role and need never end the series when one actor is tired of the part or they want to change something. My favorite is still Tom Baker.

Lost in Space. That was a very good show. Who can forget these immortal words: Danger Will Robinson, Danger Will Robinson. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-18-09  06:47pm - 5758 days #6
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I have just rejoined Explicite.com and although the navigation is in English. The content is all French. I must say that I enjoy Fench porn. The expressions are sometimes really amazing. Of course since I speak French that is not a problem for me. I don't think it would have the same effect if you do not understand the language.

I probably would never join a website that did not include English or in my case French navigation because there would be no way for me to know how to access content and so forth without using a dictionary Long live the Brown Coats.

03-17-09  06:48pm - 5759 days #23
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I watched the original Battlestar Galactica and was saddened when it was cancelled. It was starting to get interesting. I don't really consider Battlestar 1980 has the same show since only Lorne Green was brought back. I was thrilled to read that they were remaking Battlestar Galactica but somewhere along the way they moved away from humans against machines and it became somekind of soap opera with pseudo religious concepts of death, life after death and some many other twisted shit.

There isn't another show in the last 10 yrs that I miss more than Firefly. I feel (Like all brown coats) that we were robbed of what could have been an amazing series. As much as I appreciate Fox for making many great Sci/fi series. I truly dislike their habit of not allowing them a chance to mature. You knew Firefly was doomed from the beginning when the first episode wasn't the pilot, and then the following episodes weren't told in sequence.

No one has mentioned Babylon 5. That was a great series. Each race had a well developed background. The acting was great. The effects were pretty good. That is one of the few series that made it to 5 yrs. That is rare for a sci-fi series.

Space above and beyond was another Fox series that could have been great but was never properly promoted. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-16-09  07:04pm - 5760 days #14
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I prefer the original series because while I was watching it. I was also receiving a Starfleet Academy education on subjects like racial tolerance, understanding the importance of others view points, the futility of war, and so many more subjects. Of course at the time I simply thought that the show was cool. The effects were cheesy, but the writing and acting (yes I believe that) is where the magic comes from.

Of all the others shows that have come since that one. The only one that is disapointment is: Enterprise. In many ways it has the same problems that afflict the 3 Star Wars prequel. You cannot invent a new storyline that conflicts with the one you have already told. you can't create a different past for your characters than the one you gave them in prior movies. Special effects alone cannot make a show or movie good. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-14-09  09:57am - 5762 days #11
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


I've heard this stuff about long vids and for my tastes it's entirely long - to me it's like the Vivid vs Jules Jordan thing to give the extreme sides of the issue. Vivid likes to concentrate on their stories and they have relatively short sex scenes that are just that - sex scenes. Jules Jordan likes to have lengthy tease/set-up scenes - 10 minutes of tease is not uncommon with his vids. Me, I'm loving that stuff. That's what I want is for porn producers to find hot women, put them in hot sexy clothes and let me enjoy the site from every angle imaginable for a good long time and have me dying for someone to get their hands on her by the time that happens.

I consider it a complete waste of casting and effort for a porn producer to find hot women, put them in hot sexy clothes and not use it for anything. Can there be long boring scenes? Sure - and that's crap porn. It wouldn't be better if it were shorter. It would just be shorter crap porn in my opinion.



I don't think that anyone can compare Vivid's stuff to Jules. They truly cater to 2 different markets. Vivid's is possibly the most watched studio because, as you said, they have a story with sex scenes intermixed within the story. This allows them to market their material to the softcore markets by simple editing out the sex scenes or the sections involving penetration. Jules stuff is all gonzo sex with no story whatsoever.

I still enjoy the older Vivid material, but most of todays stuff does not include a good story nor is the sex any good. Unlike you I tend to find most of Jules new stuff bland and tiresome.

Jules movies cost in average 5-10$ more than most of the other studios(I'm talking regular dvd's and not Blue Ray).
He justifies the increase in price by the fact that his movies are longer than the average ones. He is correct about the average length, but there is not more content as much as longer content. The 10 minute tease that you enjoy tends to annoy me, because it usually invloves the girl wearing a tiny bathing suit or mini skirt and top. All she does is walk around while we get different camera angles of her doing that. Then we get to the sex scene which usually involves the girl(s) already naked and the guy with a hard on. Then the scene breaksdown like this:
BJ, missionary, doggy, cowgirl, reverse cowgil, upside down pile driving (forward & backward) all the while we have to stop the penetration for the girl to do PTM (pussy
to mouth) and when the penetration part of the scene is over we get the cum shot which is eitheir a facial or in the mouth (swallowing optional). The sequence of event is not always the same, but it's close enough. The only thing that changes is if there is anal or DP involve, but that just means different camera angles and the added ATM
(ass to mouth) which I personally find unhealthy. I'm glad that Jules wants to give us more for our money, but I don't think that this is the way to go about it. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-13-09  06:50pm - 5763 days #4
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I agree with Toadsith that Kink is well worth the price. I looked at your profile and there is no information there. It makes it hard for us to know your likes and dislikes. I assume that since you mentioned Kink that you enjoy watching BDSM. Make sure that you are aware of their content before joining. It's not everyone's cup of tea. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-13-09  06:44pm - 5763 days #7
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I agree that editing is a lost art form, or at least, I hope that we have only misplaced it. It's not just bad editing but also bad film making. No matter how amazingly good you are as an editor. A pile of shit will still be a pile of shit even after you have edited it.

That condition isn't only reserved to porn, but it's in mainstream TV and movies. How many TV show's or movies have I seen in the last 2-3 yrs where keeping track of the action on screen is nauseating because the camera and editing is too fast for the eye to follow.

I'm throwing this thought to you guys to see if I'm in left field with this one:

Is it possible that one of the reasons for the bad editing is because somehow the mentality of the "supersize me" as creeped into films? Maybe filmmakers think that compressing 3hrs of reel into a 2hrs movie is great because this way the audience will get the most for it's money. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-12-09  07:01pm - 5764 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
HI reaver. Unless they have changed something recently then I'm affraid they do not offer any package deals. They do have something called "Kink on Demand" where you can purchase individual scenes from all their sites, but I suspect that the cost will be high for someone willing to download many scenes. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-12-09  06:54pm - 5764 days #5
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I don't exactly know who's responsible for the amount of fake reviews
that have appeared recently, but the person(s) behind this move may not have realised what that might do to their membership. Now many of us will be twice as cautious about any site attached to their parent companies because of these apparent fake reviews. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-10-09  03:29pm - 5766 days #21
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
You should never appologize for putting family and work ahead of us.
I'm sure we are willing to wait until you have PC just the way you like it. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-09-09  05:44pm - 5767 days #15
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
At the moment most of my spam goes to my junk box, but I still got about 5 in my main box while I had about 43 in my junk box. I don't wan't to have to create multiple email addresses to prevent spamming. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-08-09  08:19am - 5768 days #5
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I have noticed an increase of porn spam in the last 12 months. Most of mine tend to be about low cost meds and girls having sex with farm animals(Yeah that sounds fun...NOT). A few of these used my full name so they had to come from a site I joined or the credit card
processor. I sometimes get as many as 30 per day. They all go to my junk box, but still it shouldn't happen at all. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-08-09  08:10am - 5768 days #32
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I concur with badandy400 that unless you are willing to fork over some cash then you're doomed to a certain amount of sub-standard porn. If you decide to start paying for your porn then I would recommend Naughty America as a good first choice. They have large
sections of MILF themed scenes. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-06-09  07:13pm - 5770 days #14
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by HotMandy:


I think you see a lot more "real" sex in amateur porn, which is probably why I enjoy this so much more than the very hollywood glossy porn, which indeed has a complete lack of intimacy, and is more like to bodies that happen to be hitting each other, which I dont find a big turn on. As a female porn lover, I reckon Im pretty good at spotting fake "sex" which the people involved are very much acting out, which doesnt do a lot for me personally. Its the act of seeing other people actually loving what they are doing, which normally stems from an element of intamacy, which is the turn on for me. But each to their own xxx


My experience with most of the amateur sex has been less than good. More often than not the guy has wood problems, the camera is never in the right place, the lighting is never adequate, editing(there isn't any). I'm hoping you can offer some movie titles or sites where I might see those movies that you enjoy.

As a male porn lover, I am doomed to never be able to distiguish between a real and fake sex scene, but then again I am a guy and we can never tell if you are faking.
(sorry for that lost one. I'm just crazy tonight).

I also prefer to feel like the performers enjoy what they do. I can't always tell, but that may be because they are good actors. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-26-09  06:33pm - 5778 days #12
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by badandy400:


Pat, I believe someone has mentioned that position before. I have actually seen it in a few places, unfortunately I can not remember where now. It actually is interesting to watch. It works particularly well for anal. I have done this one in real life, it certainly is not bad. It is a great position for the girl if she is not into it, since she lays completely relaxed she can not complain about a headache! :)


This was a common position in many movies that Ron Jeremy appeared in. I'll have to do some research. I have seen it in some recent movies as well. You are correct that it is often attached to anal sex. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-25-09  07:07pm - 5779 days #10
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I'm a classic porn movie guy so many of my favorite movies date back to the 70's. I don't know if it was by choice or not, but showing penetration did not seem very important. It was still there but the directors seemed to be going more for eroticism than actual raunch.

One position that I really like and we don't see very often is where the girl is lying flat on her stomach and the guy is lying right on top and all you can see is him penetrating her. It doesn't allow for a greta view of the penetration, but I still think it's hot. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-24-09  06:59pm - 5780 days #18
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


So, here's my whole 2 cents on the issue. Lately, I've been a bit of scrooge and have been slammin' some newbies who have posted absolute junk for reviews (today some new guy who claims to have been a member of Sapphic Erotica over 6 months ago gave the site a "100"). "Ding". Slammed in a comment and a negative trust. If I'm all about protecting my perfect trust rating then I'd probably shy away from it.



You might be right that someone could take offense at your
giving them a bad trust rating, and retaliate by giving you one as well. I don't have an issue with someone giving me a bad rating. I have issue with the anonymous no comment ones.

There have been a few reviews recently that smelled like piles of poo. That last one for Sapphic Erotica falls under that category. I don't care if you are the biggest fan of lesbians sex. There is no way that site could get 100% where nothing was wrong except a comment about the danger of getting infected with HIV...Say What??? I gave the guy a break but I better see another review from him in the future with a more reasonable score and actual info. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-24-09  06:47pm - 5780 days #9
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:



Definitely need more forum participation. Probably the only way that's going to happen is if people start posting about stuff like sports, politics, current events, stupid pet tricks, etc. I'd love to see more people post about a variety of topics as I think a lot of us are starting to see the same stuff get rehashed. Boobs and Butts can only take you so far and with the forum almost a year old I think we're all getting a little red faced on that stuff.


I'll second that. I would like to have more discussions on subjects other than porn in the forum. I'm just not sure if we would be allowed. I'm sure Khan or Rick can confirm the possibility. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-23-09  05:59pm - 5781 days #14
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I notice that mine have also disapeared and I just wanted to say thank you officer and I'll never do it again. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-17-09  07:05pm - 5787 days #21
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I've got to be honest and say that I was annoyed with the negative trust rating at first. Mostly because it was without comments. It doesn't bother me anymore. I respect someone not wanting their identity known. At least say why you're giving me a negative trust rating. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-15-09  06:33pm - 5789 days #25
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


Having talked to lots of women with extensive tattoos - living in the Bay Area, that's not difficult - I can say that most women are getting tattoos because they want them. That's the culture that they are attracted to. It's edgy and individualistic, as they see it and they want to express themselves by spending lots of money getting extensive tattoos, not to prevent bookings for all-natural porn sites.


I hope that a woman who has accumulated extensive tattoos over the years likes them. Are any of the women you spoke to in an all nude industry? Did any of them wait until they were in their 20's before getting their first one? My statement is directed at women who did not start their porn careers with large tattoos. At best they had small easy to miss tattoos. It's only after being in the biz for a couple of years that the large tattoos appeared on them.

I don't like large tattoos on women but I respect their choice to get them. I'm just stating a fact that their method of earning a living is severely impacted by their choice. It's not just the "all natural" websites that won't hire them. It's pretty much all of them. I'm know that they are warned early on that any tattoos will affect
their agents ability to get them gigs. I remember a girl last year who had a contract with, I think, Penthouse. She had some tattoos, but they weren't too obvious. I read somewhere that after being warned not to get anymore, she went and got a giant back or sleeve tattoo. Needless to say she was dropped and disapeared overnight.

I'm affraid that if anyone thinks that getting a tattoo is edgy and individualistic than they are 15 yrs too late. Today you have 50yrs old grandmothers with tattoos.

If anyone disagrees with my theory on why pornstars get large tatoos then by all means give me another one. The fact that they want one is not good enough, because I think that they are too smart not to realise the danger to their making money. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-15-09  09:20am - 5789 days #22
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
There is an increase in girls getting some massive tattoos and not just the plain looking girls but some gorgeous ones. I still stick to my theory that some of them subcounsciously do it to make it very hard for their agents to get bookings. I've read a lot of opinions on tattoos from this forum and a few others and the large majority of porn viewers at best tolerate them to some who will not watch a girl with them.

A pornstar makes most of her money by being booked for stills and movies. The result of getting a highly noticeable tattoo is that you make it near impossible to get bookings for the "all natural" sites. Many producers/directors dislike tattoos because they want the actress to play certain part that the tattoo(s) simply won't make sense. If the star is very popular then you will sometime notice that her scenes require that she not disrobe completely.
A sleeve or all back tattoo kills that option. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-15-09  09:03am - 5789 days #4
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I was not a very good reviewer when I first joined. I couldn't find a way to put mu ideas and opinions down. I stole most of my style from you guys. Now the way I break down my reviews is all the tech stuff is in the pros and cons, and then I reserve my opinion for the bottom line.

I have no problem with someone revisiting a review and now having a different opinion. We are human afterall and it's in our nature to grow and as we grow are taste change. I think it would be worst if you thought differently and didn't comment about it. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-15-09  08:52am - 5789 days #17
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I like my porn to be filmed from different angles, so that I get the entire scene and not just from one perspective. If you film a scene and you have a couple of takes in POV than great, but if it's all POV than it's going to get annoying real fast. A handjob/tugjob scene exotics4me mentions can be interesting in POV, but that's because the only motion is of the giel. In a sex scene the camera keeps boucing left to right, up and down and that is annoying. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-14-09  06:41am - 5790 days #13
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Sounds like some fella here has been done some wrong by his gal in the past. Sounds like a line from a bad country music song .... "My wife done left me, my dog don't respect me, all because of my VD mistake ...." (insert your own words, romantic or otherwise, for the "VD" acronym ;)


I can honestly say that I've never been in that position, but I have seen many of my male co-workers dig themselves a hole so big that they had to redecorate the dog house because they were there too often.

I was only using the forum to offer a general piece of advice on "what women say and what women mean" are not always the same thing.

P.S: I like the country song. You forgot to include driving away in my brand new pickup. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-13-09  07:12pm - 5791 days #9
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I think the series was actually called "Pink Eye" but the premise was just as you described it: the girls' eyelids would be held open (usually by the guy about to fire off a round) and she would just have to take it...

I cannot say I am a fan of that, or even most cumshots in general. They are too forced, either by the guy working himself at a blinding pace, or the girl target on the receiving end. I find it kind of disappointing, not to mention disrespectful, when the girl is squinting, or her eyes are just shut tight because she is not really into the theory that there is some sort of universal pleasure in having a guy's fluids all over her face.



I do believe you are correct on that series name. Red Eye is a non-porn movie with Rachel Mcadams.

They are all forced. No one believes that a guy fucking a girl will at the moment of climax stop, hold it in while she gets on her knees, looks up at him and then cum in her face. I think facials are one step lower than spitting in the face, and I dislike spitting. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-13-09  07:05pm - 5791 days #7
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
where did this study get it's 2 billion dollar amount for cell phone porn? I'm still amazed at all the money porn is supposedly making all over the world. I want to see some hard data to go alongs with all these studies.

The amount of people that watch porn on a tiny cell phone screen is probably so minute that if they all got together. They would barely fill a bus. I can understand using the cell phone with internet access to download something that you can then hook up to a larger screen, but the cost of uplaods/downloads by cell providers is so great that you price yourself out of most peoples reach. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-13-09  06:48pm - 5791 days #11
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Although it's true that valentine day has become more a commercial celebration than a time to thank your significant other. The fact is that no matter what she tells you her feelings are toward all the fuss made on valentines day. You forget about it and you will pay for it, becaus she won't forget it. Women remember past wrongs even the ones that they told weren't wrongs in the first place. Long live the Brown Coats.

3251-3300 of 3575 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 12 22 32 42 52 65 Page 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.09 seconds.