|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
rearadmiral (0)
|
| 1101-1150 of 1453 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 22 | Page 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | Next Page > |
| 05-16-11 05:41pm - 4969 days | #11 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
 Wait a minute here... are you saying that Jassie was hot in spite of her beautiful, perky breasts? Uh oh... this might be the opening salvo in the first all-out flame war in PU history. I'm kidding, of course, because I understand that you, like many others prefer breats to be more, um, there. But guys like me saw Jassie as almost perfection. If we're talking petite lasses, one that may be polarizing in this context is Anne Howe. Non-existent breasts for certain, but she had a bunch of moles on her body. Yet she was always one of my favorites. Anastasia Blue did some scenes where it appeared she had some skin condition. I'd still marry her. | |
|
||
| 05-16-11 05:35pm - 4969 days | #13 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I honestly can’t think of anything specific that hasn’t been mentioned before, but as a kind of porn theme, I really, really hate “douchebag” porn. You probably know what I mean, even if you call it something else. It’s the kind of porn that is made by (usually) younger guys who celebrate their uniqueness by dressing like the rest of their friends and wearing a ball cap sideways. And they all seem to have the same tattoos. These guys make porn for themselves, not for the viewer. Think Shorty Mac and you’ll understand what I mean, but ethnic background has nothing to do with it. My beef with this kind of porn is that the focus is mostly on the guys. This isn’t gay porn! A boy-girl scene obviously needs a guy, but the details of who or what that guy is are no more important than if the sex takes place on a couch or a bed. The guy is a prop! Nothing more. His job is to shut up and NEVER upstage the female talent. His goal should be to stay out of the way as much as possible and help the girl show herself off in the best way. When that’s done, pop a load on her face (sorry graymane…!), collect your $200 and go home. Here’s an example of a scene where the guy understands his role: on Jurassic Cock, the guys are obviously part of the set up. Yet there, the guys clearly know that they aren’t the reason people are viewing the scenes. There is one scene with Ron Jeremy and Cheyenne Collins where he gets her to do a little strip tease for him and then he lays her on the couch and goes down on her. He has her lie in such a way to really show off her body. Could it be distracting that the guy happens to be Ron Jeremy? Sure it could, but Ron knows the scene is all about Ms. Cooper and not him. In another scene, an old geezer I recognize but can’t name does an outdoor scene with Lexi Diamond. There is one segment where she’s sitting on this folding chair and leaned back as he fucks her. He is repulsive in the same way we’ll all be at that age (yes, we will…) but he’s barely noticeable because he helps Lexi stay in an awkward position that shows her amazing body off. That’s the work of directors and talent who know what they’re doing. Not these wanna-be porn guys who think that porn is about them. And I didn’t make the promise this time to be non-judgmental. I hate it when porn guys try to take the limelight from the girls. Here endeth the rant.  | |
|
||
| 05-16-11 02:15pm - 4969 days | #11 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I definitely agree with this! I'd much rather see a scene start with the girl wearing normal street clothes like jeans, a skirt or shorts than that silly PVC or vinyl clubwear and 8" heels. | |
|
||
| 05-15-11 05:06pm - 4970 days | #8 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I'm not sure if this is on-topic or not, but I recall reading something a few years back that is sort of related. The point of the article was about how our culture causes women to see themselves, and one of the points made was to compare how many naked women your great-grandfather saw compared to how many naked women you saw given the sexualization of our culture and the explosion of porn on the internet. The luckiest of great-grandfathers maybe saw two or three naked women (one real, two in pictures). I've had the pleasure of seeing thousands and thosands of naked women. And it hasn't altered my grip on reality at all. But I am legally changing my wife's name to "Tanner Mayes." | |
|
||
| 05-15-11 05:01pm - 4970 days | #4 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I’m not siding with graymane simply because he started the thread and we have to treat him nice in case he gets mad at us, and I’m not picking on you, but… Oiling the girl up No, no. no! I can’t agree at all. I’ll agree that this shouldn’t be a porn thing – it should be a Sacrament! Rearadmiral’s Church of Holy Oils. This week only (and next week too): Free Facials! Writing on their foreheads I’m sitting on the fence with this one. In a standard porn scene it is just stupid. And it would probably stop immediately if the female talent dealt with it appropriately. Grab the marker and shove it up the male talent’s ass. But in BDSM scenes where humiliation and power imbalance are part of the theme, I’m okay with it. And here it would be appropriate for the male talent (the Dom) to stick the marker up the female talent’s (the sub) ass. Upside down piledrivers Agreed here too. I have no idea what the point is of this position. Two things always come to mind when I see one: they’re fucking showing off, and I wonder if his dick will break. Cumming on women when their in the piledriver position As I said above, I agree with you on the piledriver issue, but not on the cumshot issue. Facials and body shots prevent unwanted babies. (Please note that babies are definitely NOT welcome in Rearadmiral’s Church of Holy Oils. Close ups on their bum hole until the women pulls it all out until you can see right inside their rectum I’ll tell you what. Let’s agree to a compromise on this. I’ll agree with you on this forum if you send me all the pictures and videos you have where this occurs. I’ll give them a good home. | |
|
||
| 05-15-11 04:40pm - 4970 days | #3 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Excellent topic, graymane! I can't add to the list right now, because my brain never seems to work well on Sunday evenings. But I will add some comments on your well-thought-out list. 1) Ongoing Screamers (breaking the sound barrier) from some gal performers during sexual activity. Agree 100%. The worst I can think of are two teen twins who've gone through a bunch of names in the business. Cali Marie and Kylie Marie is the name I usually stick with, though one of them went by Cherish for a while and collectively they�ve gone by "The Milton Twins" too. Anyway, these two (Kylie Marie, aka Cherish is the worst of the two though) have this exceptionally annoying "oh oh oh" that goes CONSTANTLY through the scene. It doesn't happen often, but I have turned the sound off on several of their scenes. 2) Unecessary other distracting noises going on throughout their scenes. Agreed. The people who work on the technical bits of porn need to plan better to avoid these sort of things. Would Coppola have won the acclaim for The Godfather if he didn't care that the gaffer farted during the restaurant scene where Michael kills Sollozzo and the crooked cop? 3) Non-stop Ahhhhing, Ohoooooing, ughing, as well as other blantantly phoney utterances -- Which includes, but not limited to, "fuck me harder" , "shit", "oh shit", etc....I think you get my drift. Agreed again. See my comments to your point #1 above. I might also add, as a big fan of anal sex scenes, that I find any use of the word "shit" during such a scene to be inappropriate. If the lass feels the need to say something, stick with something like "Pummel my bum with your meat stick, baby!" 4) Male performers humilating, verbally and physically abusing their partners..ie., "you bitch" "you slut" "you whore" and , of course, the insane practice of agressively slapping hell out their face, tits and asses. Agreed again. I think a pattern is forming here. I think that the rise in this kind of activity in mainstream porn is linked to the rise of porn by and for self-centered and self-indulgent male turds who think that the porn is somehow about them. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: the male in a porn scene is nothing more than a prop. His job is to make himself unmemorable and focus all the attention on the lady. As he pummels her bum, of course. The exception to this rule is in scenes where it actually fits with the theme. As in BDSM stuff. 5) Facials: I know I'm beating a dead horse, here, but will this egregiously mandatory sex event ever go away? Well it had to happen: I don't agree with you on this one. I sure hope that this "egregiously mandatory sex event" never goes away. In fact, I want to see it as an Olympic event. Think how many teenage unwanted pregnancies are avoided by the simple act of the lad depositing his goo on a ladies face. 6) cum-shots. Could somebody please tell me whats so appealing about seeing jets of seamen shot out of a guy's cock or have it deposited all over a woman's face? See number 5, above. You clearly forget that one of the books in the Gnostic Gospels says that the facial is an act to bring oneness with the Lord. Seriously. It's one of the shorter books though. 7) Closeups: they're nice to see, but do we really need microscopically long and tedious focus on a woman's genitalia or, (gag!) the ill-consuming sight of a guy's hairy ass pumping away atop his partner. I think I'm 50/50 on this one. I'm not a huge fan of close-ups, but sometimes I do enjoy a nice view of a woman's anus. That way I can imagine that I'm so close to her (Tanner Mayes') bum that my nose is actually IN her vagina. But the inadvertent (and I sure hope these are inadvertent) close ups of a guy's hairy ass as he pummels a wee lass's bum are best left on the editing room floor. 8. Too much time spent on the obligitory fellato and cunnilingus scenes before the fucking starts. Can't agree here either, my friend. Foreplay is important and I want to see it all. Seeing a lady lying back and enjoying cunnilingus and analingus is important to the artistic merit of a scene. 9) An idiotic guy's voice going on in the background or accomanying solo scenes. Depends, but mostly I don't agree with you on this. I know I'm not with the majority, but for some reason I really like hearing the cameraman or director give directions. It helps when they're in English. ALS Scan does this well. 10) Incredibilly stupid cameramen casting shadows, making unecessary noises, and otherwise fucking up the scenes with piss-poor video shooting. Agreed. I think this is again related to the rise of porn by and for self-centered and self-indulgent male turds who think that the porn in somehow about them. Any idiot thinks he can grab a camera and pay a chick $50 to blow him and he is now a serious porn producer. These guys should just fuck the fuck off. 11) Mammary endowed porn stars who're obsessed with their tits -- forcing us to watch an endless jostling, licking, and otherwise manually toying with them before giving us but a fraction of what we're waiting to see. (Aria Giovanni comes immediately to mind). Hmmm... strangely, I have no opinion here. I'd like to, but of the several terabytes of porn I have I don't think that I have any scenes with a model with even C-cup breasts. I'm an A-cup man myself. But I trust your opinion so I'll take your word that this is bad and agree with you. Edited on May 15, 2011, 04:47pm | |
|
||
| 05-15-11 03:00pm - 4970 days | #2 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Count me in on this. I love models that are less than perfect. I can't think of any right now, but they are certainly well represented in my collection. One of the reasons I'm not a big collector of photos is that so many of them are airbrushed to remove imperfections. Give me real women in erotic photos any day. | |
|
||
| 05-15-11 07:17am - 4970 days | #9 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Oops! Sorry. I was just getting in from an event and my brain was pleasantly numb with decent wine. My sincere apologies Drooler! | |
|
||
| 05-14-11 09:48pm - 4970 days | #15 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Just thought of this - Steve Earle and Allison Moorer. And she's pregnant. Good for them. I really mean that. I'm just envious. | |
|
||
| 05-14-11 09:06pm - 4971 days | #7 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Denner: Thanks for the kind words. I'll be honest, I might have reacted differently if it wasn't a regular. I'll knock you off of top spot now. Don't take it personally! M | |
|
||
| 05-14-11 12:03pm - 4971 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
So does it or should it matter if the review is a detailed from one of the regulars or if it is a short review from a newer PU? I don't think it should matter, but it might impact on how long I'd wait to kick it from the top of the list. | |
|
||
| 05-14-11 08:30am - 4971 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I might be the only person here who even thought of this, but probably not. This might only apply to me because I write reviews in Word and then copy-and-paste them into the PU page. This probably doesn’t apply if you just write your review in the specific page. I tend to take a few days to write a review so I have to do it in Word. So…if you’ve written a review and are ready to post it and you see that someone (especially, but not only a ‘regular’) just posted a review, do you wait to post yours to give the other review more time at the top of the list? I was just about to post a review of Jurassic Cock and I see that Drooler recently posted a review of Private Worlds. Drooler writes great reviews so I don’t want to bump him out if the front of the line just yet. So am I being courteous or just weird? | |
|
||
| 05-13-11 12:29pm - 4972 days | #16 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Ummm... my place?  | |
|
||
| 05-13-11 12:28pm - 4972 days | #15 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I hadn't thought of that, but you're right. Opportunity has a lot to do with it. That's probably one of the biggest reasons why more Canadian women in porn come from Quebec then anywhere else - it is just more prevalent there. | |
|
||
| 05-13-11 12:24pm - 4972 days | #14 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I appreciate yuor compliment, jberry169. The bit about you not often calling my tastes into question, that is. Kacey Jordan is by no means on my A list of stars, but I have to admit to having a real-world liking for skanky women. | |
|
||
| 05-13-11 12:21pm - 4972 days | #19 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
You might be right about the Christian fundies, but I wouldn't count them out just yet. They're largely ineffective politically, but if a politician wants to throw them a bone then porn might be an easy target. | |
|
||
| 05-13-11 12:20pm - 4972 days | #18 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Good point! I can just imagine how my argument would go: "But Dear, in my 6 terabytes of videos and pictures of young lasses getting every hole pummelled, at least no one eats poop." Hmmm... she might just buy that. | |
|
||
| 05-12-11 03:04am - 4973 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I ahve to admit - with some embarassment - that I've been downloading and watching more Kacey Jordan scenes lately since she revealed a connection to Sheen. It helps that she's got what I like. Maybe Sheen can get a gig at Jurasic Cock now that his TV career has imploded. | |
|
||
| 05-12-11 03:01am - 4973 days | #4 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I know... I know. If there was an emoticon thingy that showed a grown man crying I'd use that. So she OWES us an anal scene now! | |
|
||
| 05-11-11 05:26pm - 4974 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
(and if it’s been asked and answered here already, my apologies to all) On my way home from work today I made a pit stop in the usual grocery store I shop at to get a couple of things. I try not to let my porn use creep into daily life, but as I waited in line at the checkout I noted that the cashier was rather cute. She was maybe 19 or 20, blonde, slim, nice complexion, nicely proportioned breasts and bum. Maybe it’s because I’ve been watching a lot of ‘youth oriented” porn lately (mostly Jurassic Cock) where old farts like Ron Jeremy get to fool around with some of the freshest faces in porn, but my mind started to wander and think of her in a porn flick. So why do some 18-20 year-olds go into porn and some work as cashiers? Sure, some girls look born for porn with the tattoos and piercings (you know the look – they’re like deep-fried food. You KNOW they’ll be bad for you but you can’t resist) but many don’t. Why did someone like Aubrey Addams go into porn and not meteorology? Adventure? Money? Danger? I’m drawing a blank here. What stops my cashier friend from following her dream to be gangbanged in a porn flick? | |
|
||
| 05-11-11 05:05pm - 4974 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Most of us regulars here know the other regular’s interests. Some of mine aren’t hard to pick up on. If the model is 18-20 and does anal I’m an instant fan. Until she gets fake boobs.* One model in particular I’ve been waiting (and waiting, and waiting and waiting) to see do an anal scene is Tanner Mayes. She’s got a decent career and seems to be in it to stay for a while, so what are the odds that she’ll eventually allow a dick in the Holiest of Holies? My guess is that the odds are pretty good. The odds are somewhat less that she’ll do it soon while she still has that perky body. The other model I’d like to see do anal is Amia Miley (aka Amia Moretti). This is just a gut reaction, but I suspect the odds are a bit longer that she’ll do it. So what do you think? Does a man dare to dream? * Does not apply to any girl named Aubrey Addams. | |
|
||
| 05-11-11 04:55pm - 4974 days | #14 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Oops! You're right. Guilty as charged. Or maybe not... ... to be completely fair, I doubt the people who are into very bizarre sexual practices involving animals want to impose that on us. I don't think that I'm being judgmental when I say that I'm worried that people like the Late Jerry Falwell would want to take away my right to watch even tame porn. | |
|
||
| 05-11-11 04:50pm - 4974 days | #13 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Good God, I hope this is just another urban myth. Stuff like this make my interests seem tame. | |
|
||
| 05-09-11 04:39pm - 4976 days | #12 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I defintely agree with you that he doesn't do himself any favors in keeping up his appearance. Sure he's way over the hill by porn stud standards and no one expects him to drop 60 pounds and buff up a bit, but he could still put a little effort into it. He seems to wear sweatpants and t-shirts in all his scenes now (going for the comfort thing, obviously) and are there no decent barbers in his neighborhood? I'd feel less bad about myself if Ron could put SOME effort into it. On the Jurassic Cock site there are several instances where the set-up is that Ron meets up with a young lovely and they decide to go do the deed. It doesn't look staged, but in several scenes people on the street and people in cars honk and wave and yell hello. You have to give him credit for that. How much free young pussy does he get? I'm sure there are some young hotties who aren't in porn who might want to be able to brag about fucking Ron Jeremy. The thing about him getting so much pussy that makes it worse for guys like most of us: it isn't just quantity, it's quality too. Ron Jeremy scores some pretty hot young ladies. That lucky, lucky bastard... I'd like to be his friend in the same way a remora befriends a shark and hangs around to get some scraps. Sloppy-second Tanner Mayes is more than I could expect to get on my own. | |
|
||
| 05-08-11 11:50am - 4977 days | #10 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I know this is an old thread, but I'm working through downloading some scenes from Jurassic Cock where Ron Jeremy appears in about half the scenes. Yes, I know it is porn and the girls are doing it for the money, but you really have to hand it to Ron for getting to have sex with some beautiful young lovlies. If only the rest of us could be so lucky. | |
|
||
| 05-07-11 07:16pm - 4978 days | #16 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Yes, I know how pretentious it is to quote yourself, but I realized that I didn't leave myself any wiggle room. Let me make this clear: if Aubrey Addams, Lexi Belle or Jada Stevens wants to trade a couple of hours of their time for my entire porn collection, then call me a pirate. A man has limits. And if that ever happened it'd end my posting at this site because I'd probably suffer brain damage from lack of oxygen for burying my face in their nether regions. | |
|
||
| 05-07-11 07:11pm - 4978 days | #15 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Count me among the non-streaming folks. I was looking at a site yesterday (I forget which) and my credit card was out. When I saw it was streaming only that shut the deal down. To all webmasters out there: there are still some of us who WILL NEVER SHARE MATERIAL. NEVER. EVER. EVER. But I need to download it to use as I want. | |
|
||
| 05-07-11 03:39pm - 4978 days | #3 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
You don't have to ask twice on that one. I think the topic is legitimate, but I definitely wanted to tread lightly. I'm actually surprised that this kind of stuff is available. It seems pretty weird to me. (And I've just broken my promise to not be judgmental...) | |
|
||
| 05-07-11 12:21pm - 4978 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I’m into a Videobox membership and every time a new Monica Mattos scene is posted there are a bunch of user comments that say that she once ummmm… (putting on lawyer voice) engaged in an act of equine fellatio. Coming from a guy who likes girl-girl milk enema scenes, I realize that anything I say about this will properly trigger warnings about those of us who live in glass houses and all, but seriously, ewwwww!!!! So I’m curious; has anyone seen this? I won’t judge you, but I’m just having a hard time thinking that it could be even remotely arousing. The only way I can see such a scene generating any interest would be in the shock value. (As an aside, would that area of interest actually have porn stars? “Have you seen the latest video starring Trigger and Mr. Ed? Awesome, man!” Then again, I think I might actually have a better shot at sitting through a Trigger movie than one of Shorty Mac’s self-indulgent loads of shit.) And while I’m on the topic, I might be the last person on the planet who hasn’t seen “Two Girls One Cup.” But then again, I’m probably the last person on the planet who hasn’t seen any of the Fast and Furious movies. I’d have a tough choice if forced to choose. So maybe what I’m getting at is the kind of stuff I mentioned above is what gives porn a bad name. Right-wing religious nuts see all porn as bestiality and poop when that’s just a fringe niche. Porn can lovingly and sensually portray two loving female adults who pour milk into each other rectums and then squirt it at each other. What could be more wholesome than that? | |
|
||
| 05-06-11 04:54pm - 4979 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Ummm... why would such a scene be listed on the Irish Association of Funeral Directors website??? I'm kidding of course... But I do always get a laugh out of the other links that come up when I google IAFD. Like the International Association of Foundation Drilling. That one almost fits. | |
|
||
| 05-01-11 12:32pm - 4984 days | #8 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
No real preference for me, though one of favorites is Chelsie Rae who has been both. I prefer the blond with her. But I wouldn't kick her out of bed for being brunette though. Just to be clear. | |
|
||
| 05-01-11 12:24pm - 4984 days | #6 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
This is a great story! I've never had the issue come up because the only TS stuff I've seen it has been clearly labeled. And it isn't something that I actively seek either. Having said that though, I do have a few TS scenes. Of the thousands and thousands of scenes I have I might have three or four TS ones. One I particulary like is a vid called "She's Got Balls" with a scene with a TS named Thays Schiavinato. I don't know what it is about her, but she just did it for me. Apart from the extra naughty-bits, of course. So while I'm not opposed to TS scenes, I don't go looking for them, and for me to watch them I don't want to see the guy going down on the 'girl' or the 'girl' fucking the guy. Yes, that's probably a weird position to take, but I can't help it. | |
|
||
| 04-24-11 08:55pm - 4991 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I was reading messmer’s review of ALS Scan and he mentioned that a negative of the site for him was that there were no ‘mature’ women. I suspect that he meant ‘mature’ as in age, and not ‘mature’ in that ‘these women don’t appear to be saving enough funds to sustain them in their senior years.’ Or ‘Oooo… it’s clearly after Labor Day and she’s still wearing white!’ Anyway, my question is this. Have your tastes changed in porn or women as you get older? Messmer is older than the average PU here, so I can understand his interests, but for me, nothing has changed in almost 30 years. I’ve been focused on 18-20 year olds since I was 18. I figured my tastes would change, but it didn’t happen. That’s not to say I can’t look at a beautiful 30 or 50 year old and have some sexual thoughts, but fantasies always involve the younger crowd. Even though that interest in real, non-porn ladies officially makes me a dirty or creepy old man. Thankfully I’ve been raised in a country and educated in schools where political correctness is a religion, otherwise I’d probably be pinching girl’s bottoms. With my teeth.  | |
|
||
| 04-24-11 08:40pm - 4991 days | #26 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Whatever... Just don't do it again. (Kidding, of course!) Welcome back! | |
|
||
| 04-24-11 12:06pm - 4991 days | #14 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I'd call that a good start! I think it was the late Frank Zappa, when speaking about churches, who said "tax the fuck out of them." | |
|
||
| 04-23-11 07:44pm - 4992 days | #12 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
The interview addressed this, and it confirms your point that this is a cash grab. The .xxx suffix goes live soon and there is a grace period where companies will be able to buy names to block their further sale. So Kink will essentially have to but Kink.xxx even if they never plan to use it. Same with Brazzers, Videobox, etc. What a great way to shake down porn sites. I'm going to put my thinking cap on and dream up a similar way to do nothing but make money off of churches. Those fuckers have lived off the cultural teat for far too long. I want in on that business. And I do mean 'business.' I'm thinking about writing a science fiction book about these space creatures that millions of years ago expelled spirits from a distant world and how we need to get in touch with those inner spirits again. No one has ever done this before. I'll target some big celebrities too. When I get rich I'll have a pool party with an open bar. | |
|
||
| 04-23-11 07:28pm - 4992 days | #12 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I don't know what this says about me (but I hope it says something positive, though the religious nuts might argue otherwise), but holy crap for some reason hearing you back on the forum has made my day. Welcome back Sir. You gave us a bit of a scare. | |
|
||
| 04-22-11 06:50am - 4993 days | #3 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Yes an no, according to the interview. The industry says that it is too easy to block a whole domain type, and the anti-porn people say that while that is easy it will also create a false sense of security for parents who simply assume that nothing bad can happen on a .com or .net site. | |
|
||
| 04-21-11 07:14pm - 4994 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Today on Q (a CBC radio show) there was an interview with a woman named Diane Ford with a porn-related connection. The topic was the adoption of the .xxx domain. Anti-porn groups are opposed to it because they say it legitimizes porn, but porn companies are opposed too. I hadn’t thought of this, but the porn argument is that if you ghettoize porn into the xxx domain then it is easier to censor. According to the interviewee, and this makes a lot of sense, it is far easier to block sites based on what come to the right of the dot than it is to the left of the dot. It would simply be too easy to shut porn off. The interview isn’t long (12 mins) and is worth listening to. Just google “CBC Q” and you’ll get it. It’s on ITunes too. Not relevant to anything, but since this show, Q, came on the air I really tried hard to hate it. It hasn’t worked. The host is an excellent interviewer. But… I detected a different tone with him in this interview. Like he was trying not to support the porn industry. (He’s a 30-something guy, so he knows porn) I’m going to email him and point this out. I’ll keep you informed if I get a reply. | |
|
||
| 04-21-11 07:00pm - 4994 days | #11 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Thanks for the answer pat. Your answer tells me that we are still a little different, even though our tastes are pretty similar. I'm a big fan of Device Bondage and The Training of O. And if Water Bondage still updated I'd be a member there too. But as 'bad' as those sites can be, they are still about the woman's pleasure. It may be intense to watch, but women like Madison Young are pretty intense in their love of pain. But we definitely agree that Kink is an excellent site. | |
|
||
| 04-21-11 02:50pm - 4994 days | #2 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Excellent point messmer. When I review lesser known sites I'll make it a point to mention that downloads are permitted. | |
|
||
| 04-21-11 05:32am - 4994 days | #19 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Amen to that. Whenever someone raises the idea of libertarianism or smaller government as supported by neo-conservatives I always point out that the whole concept is mis-labeled. Yes neo-cons push for limited government, but only for big business. Let big business do what they want without regulation. They'll do what's best for themselves and we'll all reap the benefits. Yesh, sure. Nothing bad can come from that. But... for the average person, it will mean more government intervention on 'morality' issues. The neo-cons will let banks go unregulated, but heaven help you if you want to see smut! One thing that has always baffled me is how the neo-cons can reconcile their smaller-government stance with their staunch opposition to gay marriage. How the hell can they even try to make that argument? How is it part of government's role to tell someone who they can consent to marry? | |
|
||
| 04-21-11 05:26am - 4994 days | #18 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Interesting and valid points, turboshaft. I agree with them all. Here in Canada we have a government-run system but we also rely on the MPAA, so it means a double-whammy for us. The provincial film censor boards used to be quite active, but I think most provinces abandoned them a long time ago and rely on the Ontario censor board, which, like the MPAA, is populated mostly by Christian soccer moms. The biggest problem with the government model of censorship is that it pre-determines what is and isn't legal. Often, the border cops will seize and watch a video being imported and determine that it isn't fit for sensitive Canadian minds. But... thanks to the internet, this model of censorship no longer really works. Once every quarter the federal government posts a list of all material they've seized and banned coming across the border. Most of it is hate literature but a lot of it is porn. I'm always amazed at how much of the stuff is (or used to be) Max Hardcore or Jim Powers (JM Productions) stuff. I make it a point to read that list and then within a couple of seconds I can find a place on the net where I could download it for a small fee if I wanted. One thing I have noticed is that the volume of porn being banned at the border is on a sharp decline. Obviously people are using the internet. But one trend that hasn't shifted is that a lot more gay and lesbian stuff gets stopped and siezed than straight stuff. One seizure of lesbian material ended up in our Supreme Court based on the obvious anti-homosexual biases of the border cops. Anyway, I can't remember what the hell I was writing about... | |
|
||
| 04-20-11 04:52pm - 4995 days | #9 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Again, thanks for this info. I have to admit that I'm a bit surprised that you'd be into Kink sites. I know we share a lot of tastes, but I thought you were a little more reserved. Then again, I did join Facial Abuse based on some of your comments. That was probably the most extreme site I've ever seen. Very freaky. At least with Kink you know as hard as it gets the girls consent. Some may think that kills the buzz, but for me it doesn't. BTW - an apology (if one is needed). I used your name (not in vain)in a reply to Guest2011 in his new review of Girls Gone Wild. No offence meant... | |
|
||
| 04-20-11 04:09am - 4995 days | #7 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Thanks for the info Pat. The prevalence of G/G stuff on Everything Butt was pretty my only complaint. I'll take a look again. I have an email from Kink with a $19.99 offer so maybe the time is right. | |
|
||
| 04-19-11 05:14pm - 4996 days | #6 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I sure hope everything is okay. He's a bit of a staple around here. But his last activity was a month ago. Let's keep our fingers crossed that a busload of cheerleaders broke down in front of his house last month and he's just being hospitable to them still. | |
|
||
| 04-19-11 05:09pm - 4996 days | #13 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I was going to mention that Khan because it is available on Netflix in Canada so I figured it would be available in the U.S. where Netflix offers 10x the titles. But I wasn't sure. Thanks for the info. The documentary isn't porn-related, but it gives great insight into how anti-sex the MPAA can be. Honestly, until I saw this film I didn't know that the MPAA wasn't a government agency. It isn't. It's a private company run by right-wing zealots. | |
|
||
| 04-19-11 01:47pm - 4996 days | #11 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I think it was Sally Struthers who pointed out (correctly, in my opinion) that in the U.S. if a movie shows a man kissing a woman's breast the film gets an X rating. If a movie shows a man cutting off a woman's breast with a knife, it gets an R rating. If you can find it, watch the documentary "This Film is Not Yet Rated" for an excellent exposé of the MPAA and the film rating system. | |
|
||
| 04-19-11 01:44pm - 4996 days | #5 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Thanks The Squirrel, Khan and Thomas20, those are great suggestions. I'll definitely give those sites serious consideration. I appreciate your taking the time to answer my question. The Squirrel - I'm a big fan of Everything Butt, though I haven't been a member there in a while. I'm a huge fan of most of the sites that Kink.com has. In my opinion, they are one of the best, if not the best, porn production companies around. While their material isn't to everyone's tastes, it is exceptionally well done. Again, thanks guys! | |
|
||
| 04-18-11 01:41pm - 4997 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
Like most of you, I have a few porn ‘interests.’ Probably several hundred of them. I should probably seek treatment. But I just realized that I have a new interest. After watching several DVDs in the “Big Wet Asses” series, and several in the “Milk Nymphos” series, I realize that seeing women have oil or milk poured on them is a new ‘interest.’ Can anyone point me to a site or sites where this may be available? There is one baby oil site listed here but no reviews. When I search water, I get mostly ‘watersports’ sites, which, while one of my other interests, isn’t what I’m looking for now. Any advice? | |
|
||
| 1101-1150 of 1453 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 22 | Page 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | Next Page > |
|
