Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: messmer (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (2582)  |   Threads Started (156)

1851-1900 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 7 12 17 22 27 37 Page 38 39 41 43 45 51 52 Next Page >

04-01-10  12:30pm - 5397 days #27
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


I've just seen a review by mbaya on British Tease. Maybe the site is not perfect for you, but it could be worth you taking a look at the review.


I had a look at the review but "no updates since ..." always stops me from subscribing to a site. I got fooled by 21sextury who put an awful lot of dead sites into their package and if I had the energy to write a review I would tear a strip off them for so blatantly deceiving me. I took out a long term subscription just to get all of the mature sites I was interested in and only ONE of them updates, the rest are dormant if not dead. Arghh! With British Tease I would be afraid of getting yesterday's quality which is now unacceptable to me.

PS. For some reason your quoted text has disappeared! Edited on Apr 01, 2010, 12:34pm

03-30-10  08:48am - 5399 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
There's a scheme that's almost parallel to yours. You get a message that you have acquired a virus and then they send you to the "only" place where you can get a program to remove that virus. And btw. I think the danger is not in opening an email but in the attachments (doc and exe) and links contained in emails. If the email is not from a friend I never click on those suckers.

03-28-10  10:01am - 5401 days #25
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by yadayada321:


I know some MILFs in real life who are even younger than 18 ha ha ha.


LOL. True, but no one thinks of teens or looks for teens when they search the category.

03-28-10  09:52am - 5401 days #20
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I find that many sites are being highly praised and rated because of their technical excellence or because of the large contents of material found on the site, yet every time I subscribe to a site like that in response to a review in its eighties or nineties the boredom factor tends to creep in very quickly. (Just two examples: Naughty America because of its repetitious scripts for the various fantasies, 21sextury because of all its dead sites.)

It would be nice to have notations like: photo shoots seem to be done in a passionless, routine way, videos imitate each other too much, scenes are the same only the faces change, or in the case of the biggest farce when it comes to top scores (Video Box): updates are plentiful but one looks the same as the other because niche content is being ignored.

One other thing that really bugs me is that MILFs, on many sites, can be as young as in their twenties. There should be a notation in a review that this is deceptive advertising. In defense of TBP reviewers this fact is quite often mentioned but maybe it could be stressed a bit more yet!

To return to niche content, I find far too few reviews of niche sites. If a faithful TBP and PU user cannot find one single review of a site that features mature (really mature) ladies, wearing nice, slinky underwear, who gradually strip down to the buff then there is something wrong somewhere! :-)

03-27-10  10:18am - 5402 days #19
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by justme:


But there are many regulars who take their duties far too seriously around here, in my opinion. I read some of the reviews and comments and I'm in shock. Porn is to be enjoyed. I have to wonder if some here when joining a new site specifically look for something to piss them off, just to come back here and blow it way out of proportion!

These are pornographers. They don't have MBA degrees. They don't have PR staffs. They are not tech geeks.

Yet some regulars around here demand they be perfect. And I mean, I read the comments, and just want to shout out "Damn, take a step back and look at this! you are pissed off over what is a very trivial issue"

What is the purpose around here? So onlookers can read and see how pissed off everyone is at every website? Remember, onlookers are not just looking for site to site comparisons, they are also looking for reviews with the added alternative of tube sites, torrents, rapidshare, usenet, etc.

Whatever...

I give up, you guys can have your little club.


This is not the first time your remarks baffle me because you never give details in connection with your complaints about us. "Porn is to be enjoyed" ?? .. well, yes. We all think so, that's why the criticism if we don't enjoy certain aspects of a site or the whole site itself. And what exactly are "trivial" issues? DRM, Download Limits, grainy pictures and videos, oversized watermarks ... would you really gladly put up with these because the sites are only run by pornographers and not MBAs and because porn is supposed to be fun?

These are the negative facts about a site we keep mentioning and I, for one, am grateful that others who went before me give me a fair warning about some of the perceived shortcomings of a site .. if we're not on the same track I can always ignore someone's particular "negatives" and chalk it up to individual taste.

In any case, this forum is supposed to be fun and quite obviously it isn't for you so I don't blame you for moving on. Edited on Mar 27, 2010, 10:22am

03-26-10  01:52pm - 5402 days #24
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by larss:


A lot of porn seems to have lost the eroticism that you used to get. Glimpses of flesh, pretty/sexy underwear, even when they are worn seem to disappear far too quickly. I love to see see-through panties, and to see through them, but all too often when they are worn, the whole point of them is lost when they are removed without the viewer being given that glance of pussy through the transparent material.
I do like hardcore sex scenes, but I often get the feeling that they could be far more erotic than - get naked, fuck in various impossible positions, wank cum onto the girls face.


I agree completely, larss. Many of us in this forum have complained about the same thing. We call it the lack of the tease factor in modern porn. I wrote in a post only two days ago in another forum that it aggravated me to see models wear sexy panties and then you barely got a flash of them because they bent over and removed them in record time.

03-25-10  07:12pm - 5403 days #32
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Miss Hybrid:


I have a 330 diesel BMW for all my long distance driving. It does 45 mpg and has done 175k miles since I bought it new.

All it has had is water pump, brakebits and some ball thingies on the suspension.

Lots of room when the seats are laid down too x


Wish I could have a "Bimmer" but in North America, especially in Canada, BMWs and Audis are sinfully expensive. I've had to settle for VWs and Mazdas and Hyundais. Neither of these cars ever did me wrong so I shouldn't complain.

03-25-10  07:07pm - 5403 days #31
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by ControllingMind:


'Little Speck' you've never met me you geriatric old cunt.

Are you getting a bit wobbly on your zimmer frame or something. Why not start to get ready for your retirement home or go down your allotment instead of jacking off to teens 24/7


Oh dear, this just after I got finished praising this forum for its civility! Now I look like a fool. At least for the day!

03-25-10  07:01pm - 5403 days #63
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by larss:


Happens all the time on all forums that I look at. Mostly people check out the forums a bit and then start posting, but never read the FAQ's until prompted to by an existing user, because they have posted outside the rules. Most people, once prompted to read the FAQ's will do so, if specific rules that have been broken are pointed out. I guarantee that there are long time members on this site that have not yet read the FAQ's, but only because they have not inadvertently broken them.


You're right, larss. I plead guilty to the offense of quite frequently ignoring the FAQs! Same with manuals to some of my games. They gather dust while I wonder why I am not getting past level 8 or so because I wasn't aware of some of the helpful moves I could make.

Every time I send an emergency plea for help to my brother he'll come back with the smarmy but true reply: "Didn't read the manual again, did you?" :-)

03-25-10  06:53pm - 5403 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Great thread, Wittyguy. I agree that ControllingMind has a point that we come off as very cliquey and elitist to newbies but it's a double edged sword that's pretty much necessary to keep this place as it is; open and free for people to speak their minds within civil terms.

At PU you are pretty much open to express your love of, well, whatever floats your boat as long as it's not universally illegal and taboo, i.e. child porn, rape, murder (a real trifecta of romance for some I'm sure). If it's understand you can speak about whatever than all we ask is you not bash other members in the process lest it becomes another collection of YouTube comments--"Fuck you, your video sucks!" "No, fuck you, your comment sucks!" "Fuck all of you, you're wasting my time!" and so forth...

My point is if you having the urge after reading someone's review, comment, reply, etc. to write "Hey listen, you prick, you're an idiot!" then you're best bet is to stop and think twice before insulting someone. PU's golden rule: be respectful. (I would have said "treat others as you wish to be treated," but that might not work to well when talking about porn.)


My first home was the usenet and any long time participants in a given newsgroup were always accused of being elitist by newcomers simply because they had established a certain bond coming from long acquaintance and exchanges of ideas, and newbies tended to feel left out because this bond and some of the unwritten rules that develop along with it made them feel unwanted.

To any newcomers to PU and this forum I would say that we eagerly look forward to your contributions and that you can take my word for it that we are neither elitist nor a clique. Otherwise they wouldn't have me! :-)

In stark contrast to the usenet I found, to my delight, that the gang of porn lovers here in this forum are the most civilized and forgiving people I've come across so far on the Internet.

I've participated here almost from the very beginning and I have yet to see one of the flame wars and the name calling and viciousness that are so common in other places.

Strange isn't it; society would not exactly praise us for our pursuit and love of, what they consider to be, prurient material, while I have yet to see any of the hatred and venom in here that this same society expresses in connection with anyone who thinks or believes different from the herd. Maybe being looked down on as some sort of pervert creates a bond of brotherhood and makes you a bit more tolerant of others. :-)

P.S. Another thread I just looked in on makes a mockery of what I just wrote so take my glowing words with a grain of salt. I must get rid of those rose colored glasses. :-) Edited on Mar 25, 2010, 07:31pm

03-25-10  12:14pm - 5404 days #17
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


You're going to get more road noise with the lower end models I suggested but you're not paying for luxury you don't need for an around town car and the depreciation factor won't hit you as hard.


If you live in Northern climes the problem of road noise can easily be overcome by talking a dealer into undercoating the car. When I bought my Hyundai Accent I told the dealer I found it a bit noisy and she gave me the above free of charge. It really dampened the sound quite a bit. Of course, on the left coast you wouldn't need or want that. Edited on Mar 25, 2010, 07:04pm

03-25-10  11:28am - 5404 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Many people appear to dislike mp4 but I really like it and prefer it to wmv. The picture seems crisper somehow.

03-25-10  09:35am - 5404 days #15
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


I am starting to think we are all the exceptions on here. 99.5 per cent of porn lovers are completely different and we are the ones who have tastes that no one caters for. It's as though we are standing on the shore trying to hold back the tide, because no matter what we say, that same old shit seems to sell. The more of the actions you have just described, I see, the more it annoys me, yet there is nothing any of us can do about it. It's like trying to get a French classic film that isn't dubbed on prime time televison. It's like poor old Messmer's simple wants - a site with middle aged women, wearing just normal clothes or some simple lingerie, stripping down to naked. Sounds sipmle, just like trying to get a b/g scene where the male doesn't slap the girl's ass. The more I see it, the more I take notice of it, and the more it annoys me. Have to agree with JD though. American porn is far worse for this


Thanks, Squirrel, for remembering me. And I'm still looking for that site! :-(

And I agree with previous posters when it comes to those grunting, shouting gorillas as they masturbate over a model's face, or those immature children cruising around looking for their next "victim," boasting of their prowess and treating every woman as an object. I know those things are staged but it annoys the hell out of me when they high five over another "conquest" and carry on with their school boy banter and macho cameraderie. Many must like it though or we wouldn't see these scenes endlessly repeated.

03-23-10  10:58am - 5406 days #17
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by mbaya:


To make soft boiled eggs, you boil water and add the eggs. Cook for four minutes and take them out and peel. For hard boiled, cook for ten minutes.


Mine usually take seven minutes at full boil, but then I use extra large ones. I either peel them and then cut them up on a piece of toast (I love to see the yolk soaking into the bread) or I knock the top off them and dip the toast in the yolk and eat the rest with a small spoon.

03-18-10  08:18am - 5411 days #13
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Denner:


The ol' Capn (the son of Don Martin) got a point. From this user without much bullshit:
Some want lingerie, some stockings, some pantyhose, some old time panties ect...



Oh yeah, except for the pantyhose!!!! <sigh>

03-17-10  06:18pm - 5411 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


I like nudity, and ASS! That's at least a rant.5.

But I like stripping, too. Maybe 60% gradual stripping, and then 40% totally, utterly bare-neckit nyood prancing and lolling around and offering the humble viewer them heinycakes.

But that's me, I guess.


Yeah, I can go along with that as long as there is something under that dress other than skin! :-)

And cap'n, I agree with you even though we differ when it comes to the end product. I don't mind if a model wears nylons and garter belt and high heeled shoes at the end as long as her naughty bits are fully visible and she spreads a bit and I know you'd rather see her strip to the skin.

Different strokes. However, you are right in your definition: nude means bare nekkid! :-)

03-17-10  09:41am - 5412 days #27
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by surferman:


Thanks. I appreciate that.


It was a dumb way of responding to you, surferman. It was clear, if one took the time to read, that you were looking for a legal way of obtaining material. I am shocked because this must be the first time in this forum that someone was so aggressively insulting to another member. We're more tolerant than that. Furthermore if Khan had even suspected that you were trying to promote a free site your post would have disappeared rather quickly.

03-13-10  03:26pm - 5415 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Bletch:


Hi guys
My old PC died on me (PSU possibly). All my porn collection are stored in a hidden safe on the hard drive. Not being technically minded, I was just going to buy a USB hard drive caddy, put the hard drive inside and then connect to my new PC and transfer the files over. I don't get how I can get the files off it if they're already hidden. Should I install the Steganos software on my new PC first? I think there's an import option?

I was hoping that one of you guys had knowledge of the Steganos software.

Thanks for any help :)


Sorry, I don't know anything about your software but I had a similar experience with True Crypt when my last computer packed it in. My new computer would only see an empty (external) drive that needed to be formatted but once I re-installed True Crypt I was able to mount the drive and its contents became visible again once I used the password. Might not work in your case but I would definitely re-install Steganos and try.

03-13-10  03:20pm - 5415 days #15
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Naw, not interested in 3-D Porn. Especially if it requires me to cross my eyes. :-)

03-13-10  03:17pm - 5415 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I would say, no, bi-sexuality is not a requirement for enjoying a scene that contains a female and more than one male because my eyes are usually fixed on the female model and the males are just necessary props to the scene/fantasy. I'm so not bi-sexual that I keep saying, if I had been born a woman I'd be a Lesbian! :-)

03-11-10  03:54pm - 5417 days #97
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Oops, of course one can't patent words! Trade Mark or Copy Right was what I meant and even then I am not quite sure if you could. :-)

03-11-10  02:38pm - 5417 days #23
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


A lot of hosting companies don't allow schoolgirl uniform material any more. They reckon it attracts the wrong kind of client?


Actually, so should the shaved look attract the wrong kind but no one seems to take exception to that. :-)

03-11-10  02:20pm - 5417 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I think Witty is right on the money about all the reasons why most amateur sites score so low compared to the pros. I'd only add that most amateur sites are of a single model who does stuff mostly with herself. You are lucky if she does anything with her only boyfriend or maybe a girlfriend or two.


This is where I get confused, Pat. The moment an amateur decides to build herself a site doesn't that mean she is now a pro? To me an amateur site is one where various people like to upload pictures and videos of themselves or their partners.

03-11-10  02:17pm - 5417 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Raging Buddhist wrote:

"Amateurs, on the other hand, are... for lack of a better phrase... just more real to me. I guess my idea of a fantasy isn't a well-known face, but rather watching a girl or couple who look like they could live down the street from me."

You are so right on that one, RB, that's my fantasy too. But sites like that are almost impossible to find.

I don't like it but I can put up with smaller pictures and movies that aren't quite professional but what gets me every time when it comes to the real amateur sites is that,

a) many of the models keep their faces hidden or have them blurred. I understand the reason behind this but I like to see the whole person, and

b) when the face isn't hidden there's usually only one or two pictures. I have yet to see a set. Unless they are in the paying members section. I have yet to spend any money on sites like that because they are so poorly laid out and, well, amateurish! :-)

03-11-10  02:03pm - 5417 days #93
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


I think Pat's coining of the term midcore is excellent.
It covers the middle ground between softcore & hardcore.

For me softcore goes up to explicit full nudity without insertions.
Hardcore starts with sexual intercourse.
Everything in between falls into midcore.

Cap'n. :0)


Yep, that's how I would be categorizing Porn as well. Thank you, Pat. Midcore is an excellent term. Patent it quickly, just in case the industry catches on. This way you can ask them for royalties every time they use the term. :-)

03-09-10  02:24pm - 5419 days #13
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Well, we just got finished talking in today's poll so you know my answer already. I may have my favorite models but they dwell in my computer. In real life, no way! I'd even feel I was cheating if I paid for a private cam show! :-) Some things have to remain fantasies if you are married. Edited on Mar 09, 2010, 03:41pm

03-09-10  10:52am - 5420 days #17
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


In my case, the answer is very simple. It's called a cash grab. When I joined my ISP in 2002. They offered many different levels of speeds and download limits. You could pay less and get some fairly crappy surfing and download speeds or pay more and get faster speeds and higher alloted Gigs. I was a hog in the beginning and my ISP sent me a letter offering to go Ultra-High Speed since I got unlimited download and the fastest speed the network could offer. It was a higher fee but since I had to pay extra for my above alloted gifg then it was worth it. My ISP soon realied that there were many people like me that were downloading larger and larger files. They decided that they would cancel the unlimited and offer 100Gig for people like me. I suspect they make a killing with all the fools that go over their limit. Unlike Bletch who got a warning. I don't, I just get a bill for the extra Gigs.


That would make me too uptight when it comes to using the Internet. Is there no competitor you could go to, Pat?

03-07-10  06:22pm - 5421 days #24
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


Messmer, you of all PUs should know "compression artifacts" occurs when we put a BBW granny in a bikini!

I think they're just trying to confuse us like when a restaurant says they have burgers with under 20 grams of fat...if you leave the cheese, meat and sauce off, in turn, eating a salad on a bun!


Thanks for setting me straight on that one, exotics, all those others with their techno babble threw me off completely. I got all kinds of compression artifacted grannies on my hard drive, so next time some technically challenged newbie comes along and wants to know about the subject I can send him some samples! :-)

03-07-10  09:42am - 5422 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by user2000:


I don't know if it'd accept auto-renewal, the card provider thought it would not do, but I'm happy enough with annual memberships of sites which this good website has shown to be quality.


Just came across this after all those months and wanted to state that with my pre-paid card I have never had any problem with auto-renewals. But maybe it depends on the Bank you are doing business with.

03-07-10  09:18am - 5422 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I like multiple download options for 2 very important reasons. The file size will be different and therefore will take more or less space on my drives. The other reason is of greater concern because bigger files sizes means more alloted free download space from my ISP provider. The advent of more and more content in HD is killing my possible download opportunities. I try to balance the quality with the size of the files. I have 100GIG of free alloted download from my ISP. It doesn't take long to reach the maximum with files that are near or above 1G.


Boy, that download limit sucks, Pat. I am glad that my ISP hasn't gone that route.

03-07-10  09:00am - 5422 days #21
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Thanks, guys, for all those enlightening posts. I really enjoyed gaining a bit of additional knowledge as well as peace of mind!

03-07-10  08:48am - 5422 days #20
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Reg Berkeley:


Drooler's got some good stuff in there. But I would suggest the following correction -- JPEGs cannot degrade from opening and closing --- only from editing and resaving, thereby imposing additional compression.

So view all your images until you guys are blue in the face...the quality won't be affected at all. Otherwise, all us webmasters would be constantly having to redo our static assets.



Thanks, Reg. That's good to know.

03-06-10  06:36pm - 5422 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


I agree with both sentiments. Enhancements tend to make me lose interest pretty quickly. I was watching some of Teagan Presley's older stuff yesterday and seeing her so fresh, innocent and natural made me cringe to see what she's become.

As for freckles, I'm with you on this one 100%. Faye is a big favorite of mine. Allison Whyte is another freckly favorite. Frekled models are too rare.


I love Allison Whyte. I have tons of her stuff on my hard drive. :-)

03-05-10  03:47pm - 5423 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Yup. It's going to mean those special images and video of your favorite stars doing degrading acts are going to be, well, degraded, if you follow me. ;)


LOL. Gotcha!

03-05-10  03:46pm - 5423 days #6
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


What Turboshaft says is true! Once I realized that about jpegs, I understood why the images look so awful in the tours of some sites that have old, non-exclusive material. It's not just pixelation, with the tell-tale "halo" effect around a model's curvy edges, but loss of original color, too. The pics wind up looking "icky" after having been passed along through so many hands.

I make it a point not to open a jpeg image file more than I need to, to save extras of real favorites (opened only as a "last resort"), and to back up copies of everything newly acquired on a separate volume.

I suppose I could be even more extreme and anally retentive about it by saving them as lossless uncompressed TIFFs, but I'm too miserly with my hard drive space to do that!


Good Heavens, Drooler, it's worse than I thought. I never knew that jpegs could deteriorate just by being looked at too often. Thanks for that bit of information. And I agree with you about TIFFS. Impossibly large files.

03-05-10  03:05pm - 5423 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I can be unequivocal in this: the moment she acquires "ENHANCED" breasts she becomes an ex-favorite! :-)

Talking about favorite models, anyone else like Faye Reagan/Valentine? I love freckles.

03-05-10  03:00pm - 5423 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


They are the result of compressed video files being used on DVDs (and in other video formats as well), particularly from older files that have been copied from one source to another. The problem is that DVDs use a lossy file format for their videos--raw, uncompressed video files are too enormous to be practical--and errors can show up from compression of the original files into the final MPEG-2s being used for the DVDs.

This can happen in JPEG images as well, especially after the file has been opened and closed numerous times (uncompressed and then compressed again), the end result is a more pixelated looking image.

(Wikipedia has an entry on compression artifacts too.)


Thanks, turboshaft. So compression artifact showing up could mean loss of clarity or pixelation. Is that right?

03-05-10  02:35pm - 5423 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada


I keep reading in reviews about "compression artifacts" showing up in some DVDs. How would that manifest itself? I've never heard of the term before. Thanks.

03-03-10  11:07am - 5426 days #19
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Denner:


Yes, messmer - me to - jumped up and down from the couch - it was wild! (and that crazy goal 3-2 by Crosby, wauw!!) Been staying up for nights - because of time-difference most game here was on middle of the night/early mornings - but do not mind missing my sleep when hockey like this is on...


You'd make a good Canadian, Denner! :-) BTW, Crosby's family lives only 10 Kilometers from my place. They had a great time celebrating in Cole Harbour, NS.

Originally Posted by Denner:

BTW: Was not entirely wrong with my first input here: Final: Canada-USA -- brag, brag, brag....(ho, ho, ho).


Congratulations, you were indeed right! I am ashamed to admit it but I had my doubts at the end of the third period. Edited by Staff on Mar 04, 2010, 12:16pm

03-03-10  10:37am - 5426 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Thanks for the input, cybertoad. I find the predictability factor high in most sites but maybe, not ever having been a member of Bang Bros. I'll find something a bit different in one of the sites or the other. At least that's my hope.

03-03-10  10:33am - 5426 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Thanks, exotics. Loads of good information in your reply. I think I'll give 'em a try for a month. Especially since lingerie appears to be something no one wants or needs any more. :-)

03-02-10  03:28pm - 5426 days #6
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I've never been a member of Bang Bros. but wouldn't mind paying for a subscription if you, my trusted PU, re-assure me that their emphasis is not on fake or large breasts. Actually, large I can tolerate, even like, but too many implants spoil the net. :-)

03-02-10  11:08am - 5427 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by audrina69:


I hear you...some sites i just want sex, no story...and others I enjoy, like Brazzers or NA have plot or story in every scene.

But at least we can agree that the guy can fuck up the whole scene.


Oh, yeah, we definitely agree on that. And in connection with Janeiro I should have written: "I shudder every time I see him play another amateur!"

03-02-10  09:53am - 5427 days #32
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I understand why they film girls giving a BJ to a strap-on but it is still rather silly. I'll still take it.

I also really like it when girls use strap-on's on each other. It can be hit or miss for the reasons you have stated but when it is a hit then it's super hot. I have a couple of Lesbian movies that contain some good Strap-On scenes. There is also the type of strap-on being used that can make a difference. Some are designed to make it easier for girls to use them.

Afterall we probably wouldn't do any better if we did not ave any sensation in our penis either. Hell, we've got sensation in it and we still fuck it up(Of course I'm not refering to myself).


Giving a bj to a strap on or dildo is not only silly in my eyes but a big turn-off, especially when accompanied by lusty moaning. What self-respecting lesbian would want one of those plastic substitutes in her mouth? Isn't that what she's trying to get away from? :-)

03-02-10  09:43am - 5427 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I don't really have much in common with anyone who prefers videos that have no plot or story, audrina69, nor have I ever subscribed to Bang Bros so I can't really respond to your interesting post. :-)

I am answering because one guy who is ubiquitous in the business gets on my nerves so bad that I've destroyed every scene that contains him: John? Janeiro. He's ugly, never changes his T-shirt, has played husband and boyfriend so many times because of his ordinary looks that I shudder every time I see him.

03-02-10  09:34am - 5427 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
WeAreHairy, American Vice, Videosz, Nubiles, Anilos. With each site I get a personal reply very quickly in response to a query or problem.

Worst customer support from many British sites: sorry Squirrel and Cap'n! :-) But every time I had to get in touch with them they treated my complaints or requests for information with sarcasm and rudeness. Almost as if they had done me a personal favor by letting me subscribe. To the few polite webmasters, my sincere apologies! :-)

03-02-10  09:23am - 5427 days #16
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Denner:


Apart from a lot of speculations, the final was still one of the best hockey-games, I've seen for years....
Two top-pro teams in a match that made us all forget everything else - it was a pleasure.
It would be a shame if NHL will keep their players from joining the next Olympics OR the next WM...


I was afraid of either suffering a stroke or a heart attack, the game was so good, Denner. Please, support me in this (if you read my posts): How did your media rank Canada's final standing in the Olympics. Nr. 1 or Nr. 3? This is not about bragging rights, I simply feel that our media use the wrong criteria when it comes to determining the standings.

03-02-10  09:16am - 5427 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


The local sports news station was commenting on the excellence of CTV's broadcast. I agree with you that they did an excellent job. I can't say how well NBC did because I didn't watch a minute of it.

I don't really care if we stay in third position because it will be at least 4 more years before anyone has a chance to get more than 14 gold medals and since it's so rare than Canada might have that hnnor for many years to come. That should give us some bragging rights in future Olympics.


Hi Pat, someone might look at my reaction as a bit of overblown nationalism, but as I wrote earlier (and Squirrel confirmed it), Gold HAS to count for more than silver and bronze and most other countries rate the standings accordingly, giving Gold so and so many points, silver so and so many points, bronze so and so many points and then add the whole thing up. Lumping all medals together devalues a Gold medal. That's why Canada ended up in first place everywhere but in NA.

I am not crowing about it, as a matter of fact I hate patriotic crowing it goes against my grain, but it is a fact recognized by pretty well everyone and I am embarrassed for the North American media that they are so dumb when it comes to something as important in sports as establishing Olympic standings.

And CTV did do an outstanding job and really drew us into watching, way more than we had planned on doing when I first wrote my dejected post about not wanting to watch the Olympics any more.

03-02-10  09:01am - 5427 days #13
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


Hi messmer, pretty obviously it's golds first. That's how we do it in the UK and I think it's the same for Europe. Of course we don't win any golds in this country, unless they manage to sneak in an event that no one competes in, so it's a moot point for us. But as an objective observer the country that wins the most golds should be at the top of the table. On the BBC they were remarking how well the Canadians had done. Kerrin Lee-Gartner was a big part of the commentary team, and I enjoyed her contributions. The Ice Hockey was rivetting and it was nice to see the Canadians win. Maybe it's some compensation for not winning the Stanley Cup 999 times out of the last 1000. Anyway in answer to the question - yes, it's a no brainer, position on the table is determined by most golds. Well done Canada, I hated the comments from the British press, and thought it was one of the most entertaining Winter Olympics. I had no real reason to leave my chair apart from the obvious ones - eating and sleeping. Apart from that it was Olympics Olympics Olympics. What am I going to do now it's over? Porn seems so boring in comparison. The one drawback was my partner. Had to get her tucked up in bed early so I could get my six to eight hours in - of watching Olympics.


Hi Squirrel, thanks for agreeing with me. I am a transplanted European and I simply felt that it devalues a gold medal if all medals are treated equal (as the media do in this country when it comes to the standings). A country with a mitt full of bronze medals and not a single gold could theoretically end up in first place in the U.S. and Canada.

03-01-10  09:24am - 5428 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Bletch:


Hi guys :)
Couldn't find this site in 'The Best Porn' reviews section. Looks pretty massive. So a few questions for those that have previously joined...

Any DRM on the downloads?
Easy to cancel?
Anything that pi##ed you off?

Thanks for helping :)


Took their tour just for fun a minute ago and noticed that the content is DRM protected. Not only that but there are references to tokens. Don't know how that would work but because of the DRM alone I would reject this site.

1851-1900 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 7 12 17 22 27 37 Page 38 39 41 43 45 51 52 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.17 seconds.