| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
clubseventeen's Reply
A really easy mistake for the original poster to make. If you were a member before you would not be looking out for it to be streaming.
- The advert doesn't limit the offer to streaming only.
- The next page you click to doesn't either.
- The next page if you look to the left of the sign up box says 'to download or stream' but I suspect that no-one who has looked at the 2 pages of main advertising for the offer is going to be looking down the sidebar at that stage. Besides which, you would assume you could both DL or stream. It is really disingenuous in this context to say that 'or' means one or the other.
- The 'final sign up page does indeed say streaming only. Assuming that anyone is paying attention by then.
Generally though they seem to be reputable and it is nice to see a quick reply and an apology from the webmaster.
|
12-06-15 07:15am
|
Reply
2
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
davidax's Comment
I also just noticed that in additon to everything else, DDF called out davidax for being a liar. But what he said was true, wasn't it.
He was offered a deal, the boxes were pre-checked wrongly without him noticing, and he was refused a refund when, at the time of his message, he had tried to sort it out.
It was unwise to have called him a liar in the first place, but since then he has given the evidence that he did try and sort it out.
However much DDF might continue to think he should have unchecked the boxes or got in touch with them a further time, they now know he didn't lie. So whatever else, DDF should withdraw that accusation.
T20.
|
11-28-15 06:02am
|
Reply
3
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
davidax's Comment
DDF are right in their reply that people will be able to use their own intelligence to work out what has gone on here.
Like all internet consumers, be it of DDF site or amazon, he is at the mercy of people half way round the world to act properly. He expects two large companies that are taking his money and earning significant profit to set their websites up right. When they don't work properly he doesn't run off making public comments. He uses the on-line system to try and sort it out. Epoch say it is nothing to do with them, go to DDF. And if what is said is correct, in the first time of asking, DDF say is also nothing to do with them.
At this point he has, to any sensible observer, been ripped off. It is as simple as that.
He could have emailed the admin of DDF but he didn't. He vented on here. Maybe how he was feeling at the time he didn't think about writing a personal email to DDF. Maybe he thought about it and decided he would be given the run around again. Maybe he thought that he shouldn't have to.
Either way, DDF messed it up as they admit. The system was not programmed right and it took 24.99 off him instead of 9.99. And if you do that then there is always a risk that people will vent if they have tried to sort it out and been given the run around.
What DDF webmaster should have done was (1) accepted with good grace rather than reluctantly that his company failed to do it right in the first place (2) accepted that from a consumer's point of view, who is going to come from the starting point of trusting the supplier, that the sign up pages might not be as clear as DDF thinks they are (3) but even if they were clear, accepted that it is just not on to blame it on the customer for not spotting the errors and cleaning up after his staff's failiings, by manually unchecking the out of date boxes (4) apologised for the fact that the customer was charged wrongly (5) apologised for the customer being sent round the houses when had had tried to sort of once himself already sign the on-line system.
Ironically, in his first post the complaint was directed at Epoch not DDF. DDF only got drawn into it when they responded so appallingly to him in this thread. So whilst what he then goes on to say is less measured than his original message, it is understandable.
As has aready been said DDF lost a golden opportunity to behave decently.
T20.
|
11-28-15 05:44am
|
Reply
4
|
Only Shiny
(0)
|
Reply of
MikeC's Reply
Hi Mike, thanks for looking into that for me.....T20
|
10-27-15 02:25pm
|
Comment
5
|
Only Shiny
(0)
|
|
10-18-15 01:19pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
If you mean putting up private pictures and things without permission in real life then the person should get a custodial sentence.
If you mean made up like a script then then no I don't like it. I don't like anything that makes entertainment out of nasty non-consensual things even if it is pretend.
|
09-25-15 03:06pm
|
Reply
7
|
Dare Dorm
(0)
|
Reply of
hot4ponytails's Comment
Thank you for a timely reminder that if they don't say on the front page you can download, then you probably can't. The front page, or more precisely the lack of any more than a front page also makes me wonder whether the quality of the videos also lives up the clarity and colorfulness of still images ?
|
08-10-15 09:59am
|
Reply
8
|
Old And Young Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
Yes, but unless your a lesbian she isn't going to be interested :-o
|
07-26-15 08:08am
|
Reply
9
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
clubseventeen's Reply
HI,
Just to say, my first thought was, as said, that it was not a scam. but that rocz's issue was more likely to be operator error. It is good to see that this is indeed the explanation.
I may have used the word 'recycled' carelessly. What I meant was that some of it (and admittedly only a very small proportion)appeared on MSK already. But actually that did not bother me because, however you look at it, I agree with you that the site offers a lot of great material for the cost.
My frustration, or issue, was/is that the earlier MSK material is still offered only there in 6 segments - even the ones that are now on J17 . When I saw the updated ones in J17 I went back to MSK hoping to replace all the 6 parts ones with single files. Which I couldn't.
|
07-17-15 11:57am
|
Reply
10
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
rocz's Comment
I agree that they are abrupt in their replies. And there are issues in that they recycle content from sister sites, but in modern specs which is a bit off when they are still selling the sister site with old specs. However, I would not have thought they were outright scamming. Have you double checked the offer (sometimes you only get the deal with a longer term membership) or, and don't shoot me down here, double checked that you are logging in right ?
|
07-16-15 12:31pm
|
Reply
11
|
Bopping Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Meh. Ignore what I said. What I thought were the 4k files aren't. The 4k ones stutter in the player I mentioned and I can't get them to play in VLC at all. They also won't feed to the TV which is networked to the pc. So Otoh is right on this issue as well !
|
07-13-15 03:44pm
|
Reply
12
|
Bopping Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
'the videos on Wank It Now are great!'
Otoh is correct !
|
07-09-15 10:49am
|
Reply
13
|
Bopping Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Try the k-lite codec pack, full version (it is free). I have got the 64 bit version but each comes with some sort of in-built player. If you right click a file, then hover on 'open with' and you will see along with windows media player etc. a program called MPC-HC or similar with a little clapper board icon. That plays the 4k files off one of this groups sister sites so probably also the site you were on.....
K-lite is a genuine and decent program. But be really careful when you download the k-lite pack as the page is loaded with malware programs (with the health alert virus attached to one of them which is a proper bastard) designed to look like your supposed to click them to get the k-lite pack. You don't.
Thomas.
|
06-28-15 02:18pm
|
Reply
14
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Arouser's Review
Yeah, We Live Together is a nice site. I can't remember whether I had downloading issues or not but try DownLoad Them All.
|
06-04-15 01:15pm
|
Reply
15
|
My Sexy Kittens
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan thank you for having a look. I am going to bide my time and see if someone has direct experience before committing...
|
02-05-15 12:38pm
|
Comment
16
|
My Sexy Kittens
(0)
|
|
01-28-15 01:05pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
17
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Parsnip's Review
Thanks Parsnip, this is a useful review.
|
11-06-13 06:47am
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I usually put the radio on but rarely make it to the end. It does start around midnight here !
|
01-31-13 02:12pm
|
Reply
19
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
peskysushi's Review
I wouldn't be interested in a site that allows you to download just 3 or 4 scenes in a day. How's that for a dose of reality.
|
11-15-12 12:49pm
|
Reply
20
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
xxenon's Reply
In a seperate recent comment Tangub said "Just checked my email and found an incredible limited time offer to join DDF Network at 8.95 Euros for the first month (recurring 34.95)". So that's probably it.
|
07-24-12 01:57pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
Hot, hot, hot !
|
05-04-12 12:10pm
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Even though Dave Mustaine used to write kick ass songs, unless it's actually in the lyrics to the songs, I think rock singers should not really tell us all about their opinions unless we ask for them or it is Bob Geldof telling us about starvation for which he is forgiven.
|
03-27-12 12:23pm
|
Reply
23
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
ps2008's Review
None of the girls on the limited preview pages looks fat ! Are they actually fat or, you know, just normal !
Definately the site would benefit from a preview where you can see all the models.
|
01-10-12 10:33am
|
Reply
24
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
abbywinters's Reply
"it's just "how it's done" - everyone understands it, and we don't get complaints about it."
Lol. You have now.
I don't know why but this reminds me of a famous movie quote - "Eduard Delacroix IS dead."
|
09-06-11 11:59am
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
"Would the be Cunt? From my understanding, the Brits find this to be a very accepting version of a woman. "
You are very wrong.
|
09-04-11 04:23am
|
