| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
551
|
Nikki Park
(0)
|
Reply of
grimmaronw's Review
Like Tangub, I just strolled right into the members' area. But similarly, it's not really worth bothering, in terms of content or design.
However, thanks for pointing out such an appealing model; definitely worth investigating in other avenues, as you suggest.
|
08-17-11 01:26am
|
Reply
552
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As per Denner - doesn't usually occur to me, but if it's a reviewer I'm not yet familiar with, it helps to put it context.
|
08-16-11 12:53pm
|
Reply
553
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think the .xxx is overall a good idea, but it should be voluntary.
If it's mandated, then we'd get into all manner of wrangles about what is/isn't explicit/pornographic; most of the sites we discuss here are clear-cut, but some blogs or free sites aren't so much; we'd have folk having their sites blocked or mislabelled just for slipping a naughty word in :|
|
08-14-11 12:09am
|
Reply
554
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I use Safari on the Mac for my regular and work stuff; Firefox for porn, as it's set on permanent private mode, and DownThemAll can be a lifesaver.
Sometimes Chrome for either - it's good, but I'm inherently suspicious of Google :|
|
08-12-11 06:28am
|
Comment
555
|
Melina.com
(0)
|
|
08-12-11 12:25am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
556
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
Good review, Brad - am glad you liked BT, I kind of miss the material since I signed up, so it's likely to be one of my first sites to revisit. Might also check Girlfolio - check my recent comment on it, I'm not sure how different - if at all - the material is?
|
08-10-11 03:17pm
|
Reply
557
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Have almost no interest in massage stuff - but have seen a few clips from Soapy Massage, and they definitely have some appeal; possibly the focus on asian girls gives it more of an angle?
|
08-10-11 03:15pm
|
Reply
558
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Great review tangub - and you beat me to it, mine is impending too. I'll try to come up with a different angle on it!
|
08-07-11 09:23am
|
Reply
559
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'll echo what most other folk have said - I would do so on a site that offered regular updates, eg a few per week, and a good discount. I've got one annual at the moment, and may spring for another; but I doubt I'd go for anything more than $100.
|
08-06-11 11:33am
|
Reply
560
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I like your definition of softcore and midcore! I think that should be officially adopted to readily tell the difference :)
|
08-05-11 11:04pm
|
Reply
561
|
Girl Folio
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I enjoyed Breath Takers more than I thought I would; I'll be going back sometime. Possibly here first, if I figure out what the deal is :| Will update if I discover it!
|
08-05-11 12:32am
|
Reply
562
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Comment
I concur, Brad. Over the last few months, PP has, er, slipped in a few masturbation videos between it's more typical softer - but still erotic - stuff. Perhaps one or two videos and photo sets per model.
It may bother the staunchest of softcore fans, but I find it a welcome addition, and a bit of variety. It looks like Breath Takers, a similar site, may be going that route too.
|
08-05-11 12:31am
|
Reply
563
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Although I run various servers for my day job, keeping one at home purely for smut a la BadMrFrosty is tempting but would be a bit too overt for me :| Hence I use external drives - they are such a mass-market item now I tend to find little difference in price between internal and external.
I've got quite a few knocking around but just use 2 for porn; actually really only 1, but the other is a backup. (Drives can and do fail, sot can't stress enough the need for backup of something that has taken time and money to collect).
I'm mainly pics, but even so my 320gb is getting tight; will have to get a new pair of 1TB soon.
|
08-04-11 01:46am
|
Reply
564
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Good review, Denner, even though we don't agree - especially about the models, nearly all of whom I really like. However, I actually like that this site divides opinion; it makes me feel that there is something different to it, as opposed to a couple of slightly banal high profile sites I've been visiting lately.
BTW the update calendar shows each day's update as you hover over the day, and can get straight to the download by clicking on it. But agree that the navigation, although much improved since I joined, can be a little idiosyncratic.
|
08-02-11 03:49pm
|
Comment
565
|
Girl Folio
(0)
|
|
08-02-11 03:45pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
566
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the reply, tangub. I'm still not quite sure about the site, but for the price it's perhaps worth a try, I'm still keen on some of the models... but there are a couple more in the running too (which brings me to another comment). Your review was, as ever, most helpful :)
|
08-02-11 03:37pm
|
Comment
567
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
|
08-02-11 07:09am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
568
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Agree with slutty. TBP reviews are, almost by definition, objective - I suspect they have a quite well defined list of what contributes to the score in terms of updates, picture quality, size of archive etc.
Which is a good thing, and leaves subjective reviews - focusing more on the content - to us at PU. I've subscribed to a couple of sites which would get a bad TBP review because they are, well, disastrous :) but I've still enjoyed them because the material is up my street. The same applies in reverse; some top TBP sites wouldn't appeal to me at all, since I'm not interested in the material.
|
08-02-11 01:28am
|
Reply
569
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Maybe on average, an hour or an hour and a half a day. Documentaries, a few sitcoms and US crime drama mainly.
Share pat362's distaste for reality TV; it's cheap, easy, lowest-common-denominator exploitation; far more so than most folk assume porn to be.
|
07-31-11 11:17pm
|
Reply
570
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've said somewhat important. Of course it's very handy to have zips and luckily most sites do; but tastes are sometimes a little esoteric and as such I can't be quite so choosy as to discount any sites that don't have zips.
However, this is only with the caveat of using a download manager; where no zips are available, it's usually short work to set DTA to grab the whole set. If I did find a site that I truly could not batch download from, then I'd be unlikely to bother grabbing pics one by one.
As with Drooler, I've found one site so far that prevents any downloading - very not impressed, but with a bit of lateral thinking I managed to find a way to grab even those.
|
07-30-11 12:32am
|
Reply
571
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Many thanks, sir messmer, for the direction :) Much appreciated - still undecided but one or other will reach the top of my list soon!
|
07-30-11 12:25am
|
Reply
572
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I share everyone's previous impressed-ness with your score of 100 here, messmer :) Another site which I've been tempted by but not yet joined... although I see you've given the possibly comparable Girls Out West a high score, a while back. It possibly seems a little raunchier? I may be tempted to try it before AW.
|
07-28-11 07:32am
|
Reply
573
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Another great review, tangub - of a site which has been on my possible list for a while. I'd kind of dismissed it as a bit too met-art-y, and perhaps the models a bit too young (I usually prefer girls at least in their mid-20s); but am still a bit tempted by your mention of public pics and racier videos than MA. Download restrictions are a bit of a PITA; I doubt I'd hit them, except for the lack of manager support; I tend to use DTA to queue downloads for overnight.
|
07-28-11 07:27am
|
Reply
574
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I don't think it matters too much as long as it's not too large or intrusive. Some sites vary it per-picture, so as not to intrude on any, er, key parts; but I imagine it's too much of a hassle for most folk to bother with.
|
07-27-11 01:31am
|
Reply
575
|
Real Colorado Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Gosh :) Looks like they may be form the same folk who bring us Mastasia...
|
07-26-11 11:38pm
|
