| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Blacked Raw
(0)
|
Reply of
Kody's Reply
Thanks, yeah I felt the difference in style needs to be highlighted because they generate very different experiences. It's good to see they're holding on tightly to their moniker in that sense.
|
07-06-19 08:20am
|
Reply
27
|
Transsensual
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Good review, I am particularly pleased to see you venture out and review this site even if the content does not necessarily appeal to you.
Does it really come with Mile High Media? Because on my end I don't see this site being listed as a bonus site on their page. I even got in touch with their support team and they also said Transsensual is a standalone site and doesn't come with Adult Time. Perhaps this is a package not available in the UK, of which if it is I am not happy about that at all.
In regards to Jessy Dubai and Aubrey Kate, those two are titans in the trans industry. Both are incredible performers.
|
07-06-19 08:17am
|
Reply
28
|
Blacked Raw
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
No problem and thank you for reading. In regards to your billing, that is very unfortunate - getting random annual charges is very alarming. Hopefully it doesn't happen to you again. I've never signed up to any of these sites until the beginning of this year, probably why I didn't know they were a new biller. I've had no issues with VXNBILL thus far though thankfully. Thank you for raising this issue and I will certainly keep a closer eye on these charges now.
|
06-26-19 08:54am
|
Review
29
|
Blacked Raw
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+4K available for every video with options all the way down to 270p mobile
+Around 130 videos, 20-70 mins length each (35 mins average)
+Electrifying interracial with the video capture moving more often than Blacked.com
+Update schedule at every five days
+Images (avg. 60 per shoot on newer updates) are available in 3000x2000 vice versa
+More one-off talent here than Blacked.com, which some will be happy about
+New favourite function, create a library of your fave models and videos
+Rate videos and models
+Comment on videos
+Black web interface that’s sleek and easy to navigate
+Future scenes, scroll to the bottom on the main page
+Deals page contains discounts for other sites
+Image file sizes are small, usually 100MB |
| Cons: |
-No additional access to other sites
-Big file sizes, 4K are 4GB to 11GB while 1080p are 2GB to 6GB
-Downloading speeds range from great to good, which is important
-Same poor search engine, no advanced searching
-After rating content you can’t rate again, colours don’t change after refreshing so you’ll probably forget what rating you gave or whether you’ve even rated it
-Site can time out after some inactivity
-Tags could be utilised better
-Notification bell cannot be disabled, good thing it’s not intrusive
-Tiny info on model profiles, small bio no stats here
-Thumbnail previews only work on the main page (latest six updates)
-Image ads below videos you’re watching
-No TBP discount
-No downloadable trailer previews, like Blacked.com this would be really useful here |
| Bottom Line: |
Extra information:
No condoms (my preference)
Disclaimer: please note that by "interracial" I am referring to black men and not black women, these are industry standard terms not my own.
From the creators of Blacked.com emerged Blacked Raw. This is their follow up site that arrived a couple of years ago and opts for a different focus as suggested by its title. If you came in thinking they are a Blacked.com copy pasta, you – thankfully – thought wrong. The very rich and airy videography doesn’t follow suit here, instead there’s thrilling action with far more intensity and bite to it. Obviously the ultra-sharp video quality still carries over as you would expect under Lansky’s umbrella, with all clips supporting up to 4K but the film style is pretty different. When it comes to the best shoots they’re incredibly intoxicating, enough to send you over the edge and beyond. You can tell that the talent and production really put their backs into this because damn does it show. It’s professionally brash in the best way.
Talent pool here is very similar so there will be plenty of familiar faces, though repeat performers seem to be a bit sparser. Lansky’s vision continues around there parts as well so no heavy makeup or eyeshadows. Cumshots are indeed usually between the classic facial and creampie.
My issues are not all too dissimilar from Blacked.com. A la repetitive cheating storylines, taking the clothes off too early (though definitely not to the same extent thank goodness) and of course the calamitous search engine where there is no advanced searching available. There is nothing all that different here. The site interface is just a dark rendition, the same easy navigation carries over. Of course the new favourite function has been made readily available here as well. The quantity of images however differ far more here, some scenes pack over a hundred while others a little over a dozen. Weird to say the least, but this isn’t as frequent on recent updates.
On videography, the capture is moving more and engaging the viewer with great spontaneity. You’ll find angles you won’t find on the other site which of course is a great plus, but there also seems to be an increased tendency to miss more convenient, standard positions. This is purely down to the nature of this filming and should be expected. In any case the sex is more steamy and wild. Both the men and women are really into it, nothing masochistic if you’re worried about that. There is some portrait footage too, with some selfie captures that evoke more reality. Additionally, I found that sound plays much more of a key role here as it amplifies everything by a ton. The slapping noises between bodies seem to have a lot more body – excuse the pun – and fullness. Absolutely great stuff, another strength that is worthy of high praise.
One element I haven’t covered yet is the lighting. Grandiosity is not the intention here so of course it’s nothing like Blacked.com. The contrast is much greater, with a lot of brightness shone on the models whereas the background is quite unlit. I think there is more saturation going on too. I suppose this is the image they’re shooting for with the “Raw” moniker after all and I certainly like it, the vast majority of it anyway. Occasionally it contrasts too much and diminishes the experience somewhat. Too dark and too bright essentially and it’s notably apparent on images. The first few scenes had poor lighting, felt like I was watching it through a blurry keyhole but they’ve made large strides since so there won’t be any of that anymore. Good.
The last thing I want to touch on are the images. The first – or last - few images are usually selfies taken by females with males. They are not high definition with a grainy quality so they’re mimicking real scenarios which is great. However, they’ve taken steps to insert small watermarks centrally. There are two sides to this: the first is that it disrupts the fantasy, even if they are small they are hard to ignore. On the flip side they kind of have to do this. The quality isn't distinct like their other images so these precautions I think are necessary to combat idiots passing these pictures off for different purposes. Google Dani Daniels’ if you want an example. Some is better than none I suppose.
All in all Blacked Raw produce super interracial with a visceral kick to it. They are firing at all cylinders here with what they have so far. If you have already have a membership with Blacked.com, you will regularly be met with discounts for Blacked Raw with a horizontal bar near the top of their main page. This option makes things easier if you’re interested in both as there are no bonus sites here. Wait for a $10 flash sale if that’s a deal breaker for you. Very easy recommendation for interracial lovers and certainly recommended for everyone else. Lansky’s genius continues, these guys rule and show no signs of slowing down. |
|
06-26-19 08:07am
Replies (4)
|
Review
30
|
Blacked.com
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+1080p available for every video with options all the way down to 270p mobile, 4K available as far back as August 2016
+Magical production value, simply magnificent
+Around 370 videos, 20-70 mins length each (35 mins average) excellent quantity considering the quality
+Update schedule at every five days
+Images (avg. 60 per shoot on newer updates) are available in 3000x2000 vice versa, cream of the crop quality but on the small side on quantity
+Good blend of repeat performers and one-off talent from varying backgrounds, ages mostly 22-25 with occasional 30+
+New favourite function, build a collection of your favourite beauties and shoots
+Rate videos and models
+Comment on videos
+Squeaky clean, modern interface that’s easy to navigate
+Upcoming scenes, scroll to the bottom on the main page
+Deals page has discounts for other sites outside Lansky’s umbrella
+Image file sizes are small, usually 100MB
+Good to great download speeds |
| Cons: |
-No additional access to other sites
-Large file sizes may be bothersome, 4K sizes range from 4GB to 11GB and 1080p from 2GB to 6GB
-Obtrusive “Blacked.com” watermarks on some pre-scene images
-Poor search engine, no advanced searching available
-After rating a scene or model you can’t rate again, colours don’t change after refreshing so you have no idea what rating you awarded nor know if you rated them
-Site can time out after a period of inactivity
-Solo and sex images have taken a dip in quantity compared to previous years
-Tags aren’t efficient or useful as they could be
-Notification bell cannot be disabled, good thing it’s not intrusive
-Very little info on model profiles, just a short bio no stats available
-Thumbnail previews only work on the main page (latest six updates)
-Image ads below videos you’re watching
-No TBP Discount
-No downloadable trailer previews, would be really useful |
| Bottom Line: |
Extra information:
No condoms (my preference)
Disclaimer: please note that by "interracial" I am referring to black men and not black women, these are industry standard terms not my own.
This is it. You’d be hard pressed to find anyone into porn who hasn’t heard of prestigious, interracial powerhouse Blacked.com. This one transcends beyond the bubble of pornography and for good reason. Teeming with top tier production value and jaw-dropping talent, it’s no surprise to see Lansky establish a large fan base and break into the world of memes and pop culture. For me, that is a testament to how successful they’ve been ever since their conception.
If it wasn’t obvious, I love this site. Hung black men, devastatingly beautiful women sandwiched with razor sharp videography. 4K is more of a normality here, dating back to 2016 so there’s plenty to go around. When it comes to the ladies, Lanksy’s motto seems to be less on eye shadow, nail polish and tattoos. This is a feat I wish more sites shared – though I do like tattoos as long as they’re tasteful and there’s a few models here that have them. When it comes to cumshots, they’re usually a toss-up between a lush facial or a delicious creampie – a great finality either way. Year in, year out the production value escalates to new levels and so does the experience. The best shoots deliver eye candy akin to honey rippling in paradise. A sense of sweet satisfaction like no other. Seriously, I get chills. Tori Black’s “The Big Fight” springs to mind.
Now come the criticisms. In recent years, branding soared to new levels particularly on images. While I appreciate their motives, it can leave a bitter taste when I see enormous “Blacked.com” watermarks plastered on the starting solo images. They vanish once the scene begins, resuming to normal watermarks. Regardless, they weren’t sexy or cool. It’s good to see they have clamped down on this practice looking at the newest material, at least to some extent. However, solo images during scenes have taken a clear dip in quantity compared to previous years which I do not appreciate.
When it comes to plot, I love some good cheating stories, but even I think they play it safe by using this narrative many times over. They aren’t the most scintillating per se. More creative and risky approaches would raise the bar but they seem happy to stay put. The settings are also quite predictable but to their credit they are venturing elsewhere more often nowadays.
Cue the moment to go back on the models’ presentation (slightly). On recent material, the ladies are stark naked throughout the sex and as early as the blowjob all too often. A dash of lingerie, stockings or cute little dresses always spiced things up before but that doesn’t seem to be in their interest nowadays – perhaps a section of their fan base are against it. In fact, I’m sure it is. They often take everything off too early for my taste. I prefer more build up personally or heck some shoots for them not to be stark naked for such a long duration. Ashley Lane’s “Schedule Opened Up” dropped late last year on Blacked Raw and is a good example of a brilliant shoot sweetened with amazing lingerie and stockings to match throughout. Again, this is a matter of taste. I would like the variety back is all.
My final issue concerns the search engine. For such an established site, it’s comical how dreadful their search engine is. There is no advanced search available, the model index has a few bog standard filters, so often I found myself sifting through pages (max 5 at a time) or skipping to the last. They’ve had long enough to improve on this as well. No excuses. While they’ve finally introduced favourites, a fantastic and much needed addition to build collections, they’re the tip of the iceberg on what else they can improve. More info on model profiles also wouldn’t go amiss either. Otherwise the site looks very crisp, sharp, simple and easy to navigate around. The browsing experience is surprisingly subtle in difference versus without a membership. Other than the full streaming and downloading, it very much feels the same. You definitely know what you’re getting and I like that.
To conclude, when all is said and done these issues – sans the search engine - are just mild bumps on an otherwise luxurious ribbon of road. Big names come with big expectations and highly coveted Blacked.com for me are unequivocally, the crème de la crème of interracial pornography. If you like interracial, this place is a no-brainer and even if you aren’t I still highly recommend it. I adore Blacked.com. However, it isn’t perfect. While there are things they’ve improved on, there are also things they were better at before. With a bit more polish, their potential is nigh-on limitless. Offering an all access package along the other sites would itch a scratch that would never need itching again. |
|
06-26-19 07:54am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
31
|
WCP Club
(0)
|
Reply of
CowboyDave's Review
This is a pretty good review, thanks for the heads up about saving favourites and categorisation. Disappointing to hear as the first part is essential in my books. I plan on trying this site out at some point in the future.
|
06-05-19 04:16pm
|
Reply
32
|
BCM.xxx
(0)
|
Reply of
Kody's Reply
Yeah I plan on returning at some point in the future and will be interested to see if the same issue persists. It is odd indeed. Perhaps I will try a different browser next time (Firefox in this case) as it worked for you. Thanks.
|
06-05-19 04:11pm
|
Reply
33
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
Very impressive first review, you write with good brevity. I hope to see more from you, thanks!
|
06-05-19 04:08pm
|
Reply
34
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Thanks for the review mbaya. Good detail that is nice and concise as always with a great summary. Such an ocean of content here, no doubt I'm interested in the many of them.
|
04-25-19 02:38pm
|
Reply
35
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I don't know much about this site or the model but those sound like very exorbitant prices.
|
04-23-19 05:08pm
|
Reply
36
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Good on you, we shouldn't allow these companies to exploit us however they like. Goes to show the extent some of these guys go to and believe they'll get away with it.
|
04-23-19 03:27pm
|
Reply
37
|
Candy Monroe
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Thanks for the review marc. Straight to the point and a lot of good detail. The Dogfart Network seems to have a whole host of sites I'm interested in, knowing that this site has a humiliation niche was something I was unaware of before.
|
04-18-19 12:30pm
|
Reply
38
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Story driven porn is unfortunately more of a rarity these days I find. I like letting the mind linger so I have no doubts I will enjoy the story and action. I still have some other sites in the pipeline though, so I'll get around in due time.
|
04-09-19 07:55pm
|
Reply
39
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Apologies for misreading your reply. TBP still has value when it concerns factual nuggets and opinions here and there, but they do not match the depth and flavour PU reviews deliver. Do you think the TBP reviewers may catch wind of this review and reconsider their next review of Pure Taboo?
|
04-09-19 07:46pm
|
Reply
40
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I see. I did not know this was the third review in the 70s from TBP. I do concur with lk2fireone's sentiments.
|
04-09-19 06:54pm
|
Reply
41
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Very good review, maybe a little bit too much focus on TBP's review but informative and comprehensive nonetheless. This site has very much intrigued me the past month. I've seen some of the trailers and they look stellar. When I read the TBP review I was disappointed to read about the vidcaps but judging by the sound of your review perhaps they're not all that bad. I agree that the TBP review seems quite unusually pessimistic.
I'm very finicky when it comes to high scores but judging by the trailers this one stands a good chance of being up there. The only true way to know is to join; it'll be a while when I get around to this site, but when I do hopefully I will be as positive as you!
|
04-09-19 05:21pm
|
Reply
42
|
Trans Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
SquaredCircle's Review
Nice to see a fellow reviewer of the trans niche. Welcome to PU and nice review.
|
04-09-19 11:46am
|
Reply
43
|
Trike Patrol
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I strongly disagree with you. Jimmy was not polite in his replies in virtually any capacity. There is a way to conduct feedback in a constructive manner. He told mbaya that "maybe he doesn't like Asians" and to not "pretend to be some objective observer just doing a public service". This is clearly condescending dialogue attempting to elicit a reaction. He asked whether exotics' review was a "late April Fool's joke"? How is he simply providing feedback and correcting misinformation? He is slipping in these types of comments in every other line. He also highlighted the score of exotics' review on multiple occasions as a "laughing stock". You say that mbaya was being pretentious when confronted about his error but you say that as if the webmaster was not pretentious in the first place. Two wrongs don't make a right though, so I will acknowledge that.
I understand that he is frustrated with the scores his site have received. No webmaster would react in rapture at all when greeted with such scores. He is also well within his rights to be unhappy should a reviewer get something factually wrong. It is his product and he is perfectly entitled to criticise. Yes, mbaya should have admitted when he said he does not frequent those tube sites. But the way the webmaster reacted is unacceptable in my opinion. He also went as far as to bring others from his site into the equation, which is against site rules.
I feel that the 99 score that came in some time ago was what pushed mbaya to do the review after a culmination of multiple reviews that seemed dubious and vague yet had very high scores. I do not feel it was a case of "discrediting" a specific review but to see if this site really is as good as all these reviews suggest.
Jimmy clearly dispensed with a constructive discussion and chose to opt for a points match, maybe a flame war. I'm not going to pretend that we were harmless in our discussion but for the most part the way we spoke did not warrant the level of malice the webmaster displayed. I know in my last reply that I gave in and it is a moment I am not proud of.
Just my two cents.
|
04-08-19 03:07pm
|
Reply
44
|
Asian Sex Diary
(0)
|
Reply of
Jimmy Regina's Reply
Not only will I dismiss this site, but I will also dismiss all your other sites as well. Your ego stroking is simply marvellous. "Self-important" and "pseudo-intellect"? Nothing like a good old dose of textbook hypocrisy.
Goodbye and good riddance, I am no longer going to be civil with you as you have remonstrated everyone here like throwing toys out of a pram.
I have lambasted you now and you fully deserve it to the nth degree. You may reply, but I won't. I am very rarely mean, but it really is incredible what an absolute nutjob of a webmaster can do to put off potential customers.
|
04-03-19 05:15pm
|
Reply
45
|
Asian Sex Diary
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Great review, plenty of detail. It isn't a surprise to see that you're the top dog on PU.
|
04-02-19 01:39pm
|
Reply
46
|
Asian Sex Diary
(0)
|
Reply of
Jimmy Regina's Reply
Jimmy, I have a few things to say here.
In my eyes, you're making false equivalencies by lumping in Pornhub, YouTube and Netflix with yourself. These firms do not charge $40 a month and for the most part they offer completely different services. They mostly exist as platforms and do not curate exclusive content (apart from their respective original series'). YouTube Premium also offers downloads.
What I'm saying is, people should have options. Yes, you're right that nobody is forced to join your site, but that was already obvious from the beginning so IMO this is just a hollow statement.
It is good to see you're at least acknowledging some areas where the site can improve, but there is no point attributing our reviews as having implicit bias when your replies are just as potent in bias. There is nothing wrong with biases. You have every right to be biased because it's your site, just as we have the freedom to be biased as according to our tastes. Embrace it. Being objective is great, but relying solely on objectivity can be robotic and doesn't necessarily satisfy all criteria to join services. The best reviews utilise both effectively and transparently.
No animosity is intentional with my reply.
|
04-02-19 01:33pm
|
Reply
47
|
Asian Sex Diary
(0)
|
Reply of
Jimmy Regina's Reply
Jimmy, you make the honest mistake that because we are living in times where streaming is more popular than ever, that downloading is a thing of the past and should be dispensed.
You're making false equivalencies by lumping in Pornhub, YouTube and Netflix with yourself. These firms do not charge $40 a month and for the most part they offer completely different services. They mostly exist as platforms and do not curate exclusive content (apart from their respective original series'). YouTube Premium also offers downloads.
What I'm saying is, people should have options. I'm sure as heck not gonna join a site that charges $40 that doesn't offer downloads. I stream all the time and download my favourites.
It is good to see you're at least acknowledging some areas where the site can improve, but there is no point attributing our reviews as having implicit bias when your replies are just as potent in bias. There is nothing wrong with biases. You have every right to be biased because it's your site, just as we have the freedom to be biased as according to our tastes. Embrace it. Being objective is great, but relying solely on objectivity can be robotic and doesn't necessarily suffice every single time.
|
04-02-19 01:26pm
|
Reply
48
|
Teens Love Black Cocks
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I was beginning to wonder why I couldn't reply to any of the trust ratings I received. Perhaps this is an ongoing feature that needs looking at. No problem, you deserve it without a doubt.
|
04-01-19 04:16pm
|
Reply
49
|
Sean Cody
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Review
If I was ever going to join a gay site this one would be up there but after reading your review, I'm having second guesses. Thanks for writing this one up. I didn't realise how expensive this site would be and I also agree that it's a let down that you only get one site, despite the substantial amount of videos.
|
04-01-19 04:13pm
|
Reply
50
|
BCM.xxx
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Thanks for reading marc and I appreciate your response.
|
03-25-19 06:25pm
|
|
