| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Fucking Glasses
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
01-27-20 07:30pm (Update History)
Reason: Technical problem that the site fixed.
|
| Pros: |
*Added 20 points to score. My membership started out saying it was a trial even though I paid full price. A few days later, the trial part was removed and I had full access and downloads of all scenes.*
I took a risk on an interesting premise and can't say it's bad, but the experience was. The content itself is good.
The concept is recording sex with what I believe are complete amateurs while wearing glasses that record the action.
Very high quality 1080p, I assume that's high quality for recording with their eyeglasses.
A lot of content, but there are multiple buts in this, they have 122 videos and over 1,000 photosets just on this site.
It was not advertised as a network, but once inside it has 15 other sites and says a total of over 1,000 videos and 90,000 photos.
They use Epoch as the billing agent. |
| Cons: |
It took 30 minutes to access the site as it kept telling me my account doesn't exist even though I was using the username and password they sent me!
Once inside the members area it says my account is a trial. It was $15. I have access to I'm going to say maybe 20% of the videos. The others have a pink X on the them and say not for trial members. To see those, I have to upgrade and pay more money. I'm not an angry person, but what's the fucking point of me joining a site for $15 a month then telling me it's a trial that doesn't include everything?
Their frustrating first login was made worse by the login page not being secure. I'm guessing when someone hacks my non-secure login they'll blame that on me too. |
| Bottom Line: |
I saw an advertisement for this and I really thought it was a site about women with glasses. After taking the tour, I saw that it's about video camera glasses recording the pickup, the sex and whatever else goes on (talking, getting to know, etc...)
Here's just a random thought from a scene I watched. Nerdy girl in the library, guy walks up and starts talking to her, they end up in what looks like a hotel having sex. It became very confusing. She had on glasses. The recording wasn't from the guy's eyes perspective. I don't know if they even know what Fucking Glasses is based on. The part that surprised me was this very full network that came with it. There's a reason for that, Fucking Glasses hasn't been updated since 2014. These other network sites have been updated and most of those are NOT for "trial" members.
Just focusing on Fucking Glasses, I have access to TWO of 112 videos.
So, I went ahead and upgraded since I do like how this content looks. It's not worth the trial + upgrade price. The full price came to $44.95. It was $29.95 to upgrade to full membership.
It does seem to be amateur content and it looks like any other amateur site. There's times where the cameraman looks like he/she has a clue and there's time the cameraman looks like he/she is watching a fly on the wall. There's too much going on in some scenes with more than one couple and the one couple scenes are surprisingly formulaic for amateur porn.
These are the sites included with the network.
Fucking Glasses, She is Nerdy, Tricky Agent (their marketing team), Mom's Passion, Make Him Cuckold, Young Courtesans, Disgrace That Bitch (can't make this up), Private Casting X, Trick Your GF, X Sensual, X Massage, Brutal X, Kinky Family, Spy POV and Debt Sex.
The more I've signed in I've noticed there seems to be a hub site called Dirty Flix or that's what the network is called.
The sites amount of content ranges from 1 scene to 368 scenes. With full access they do have 4K on the newer videos and even though I believe it's amateur content it feels more like a Reality Kings Lite or Brazzers Lite.
My opinion of it has went up and down since joining. Since I'm still a member, I don't know if there's a way to join it without going through the $14.95 trial and upgrading for $29.95. At best, this is a $19.95 a month site and that includes downloads.
They advertise 1,000+ videos, 90,000 photos and 620 models. That's not really a very high amount for 16 sites.
The majority of the content is straightforward male/female sex and it follows the pattern most porn sites follow. You can tell I'm more on the down side of my feelings towards the site as my membership is nearing the end and I feel like I wasted $45.
I am figuring price in with my score since if I didn't pay the extra price I wouldn't have been able to access 80-90% of the content. I can be nice about it and say they should look into a new way of billing, a more honest way or I can be blunt and say there's no way I would recommend this site for $44.95. I wouldn't even recommend it for $29.95.
There are a few of the sites that might hit a fetish for some like the Sell your GF site where a boyfriend agrees to let his girlfriend have sex with another guy while he sits and watches. Another is the Fucking Glasses site and She is Nerdy which has the nerd/cum on glasses fetish, but overall, I just can't recommend this network until they figure out how their site is going to work.
They have an updated box on the network in the members area that says once your membership is expired you can still access the site, look at the photos and a few of the videos, which is exactly what my $15 membership fee got me. I'll just write this one up to experience and try to be more careful about joining sites. I went to the site with a different browser and sure enough, it says nothing about the membership being a limited $15 trial. It even says multiple ways to download and stream.
If I had received all the content it said I would for $14.95, I would have scored it in the mid-80s as a network. As it is, I wouldn't score it over a 65. |
|
01-14-20 12:29am
Replies (2)
|
Review
52
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of my first times trying Kink out. This is one of the better sites for my taste in porn.
High-powered machines with dildos on them being used on women in various ways.
The scenes are long, I would even say that is part of the “pain”. Most are 40-60 minutes.
The remastered versions of their older videos have 1080p downloads.
Lots of squirting, writhing orgasms, messy orgasms, this is a site that I believe we can be assured is showing real orgasms.
All scenes are downloadable, but the highest download option on most is 720p |
| Cons: |
No longer updates, but it is all new to me.
The noise of the machines, the women screaming, moaning, sadly, to me takes away some of the eroticism.
Would be hard to justify as a purchase by itself. The scenes, even though I like them, are very similar. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined Kink two other times in the past, but did not look into all the sites and even once, joined Kink Men, without realizing it gave me full access to the whole network. Nearly everything on the network is harder than I like or prefer, but I like to try different things.
There’s no story or plot or any secret about these scenes. A woman is going to lay down on a table, possibly strapped (bondage) to the table or against a wall, there are multiple variations as to how they position the women. Some have ball gags in their mouth which I believe helps with the noise level. I feel bad for saying that, but some of the scenes are unwatchable based on all the noise mixed with the women’s screams.
The last update was on August 20, 2020 and it was a remastered Sasha Grey scene. I have noticed most of the sites on Kink have a lot of recent remasters. The only difference I see in those is they have a 1080p download option. With the length of these videos they are large files even in 720p.
I think what I liked most about it and it’s why my score is positive is that the models are often mainstream porn models. This seems like a niche made for amateurs, but the mainstream models, many of which are sexy, show a side of these models that you don’t see in their mainstream scenes. I’m not sure if that is a good thing -- for the porn industry as a whole, there are some known “innocent and sweet” models on here showing they are wild and experienced, but that’s what happens when a woman watches too much porn. I start noticing things that are not that important to the point of the scene.
I believe the other strong point is you’re seeing real orgasms on this site. There’s not a way to fake an 8 inch dildo hammering inside the woman for 40 minutes. There is squirting, puddling, sticky messes and the women do talk about the experience. They all seem very pleased and satisfied!
The rest of the site is basic, but that’s not a detraction. The scenes are laid out 20 to a page, the download options on the majority of scenes are 720p, 540p, 360p, 288p and 270p. There are pictures, but it seems like to me this is the one site where pictures are not useful. There’s too much movement.
I would recommend it to anyone like me who is interested in something different and tries Kink out. I believe this is the least hardcore or possibly “offensive” of their sites. They do excellent work with the cameras and in making the models at least seem comfortable. |
|
06-09-21 05:02am
Replies (1)
|
Review
53
|
Full Porn Network
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A 16 site network of sites that are mostly rough and anal-centered. Would that be analcenteric?
Most of the scenes have 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K video download options.
The network has updated 9 times over the last week.
Pretty models in about 80% of the scenes.
Well-known models even for me, but there are some amateurs.
Mixture of male/female, threesomes, group of men with one woman.
Photos and screencaps can be downloaded. The photos include pictures of just the female. |
| Cons: |
This one was not on my list to join, but I decided to be open-minded and try it. It's probably time to stop opening my mind.
The James Deen site seems to be the dominant site here and the newer updates include old scenes on it. I think that's also a con for the network since those are shown as network updates.
The amount of lube they go through. They must have something like a 55 gallon barrel of it.
More implants than I like to see. I don't mind the tattoos as much.
Do they put the cheapest mascara on the women to get it to run down their face like that?
Scenes shared between the sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
A lesson in being newer to joining sites outside of my safe 8-10 sites I like, don't have multiple sites open when deciding which to join. Despite joining this on what I'm going to call an accident, I'm going to try and be as fair and as objective as possible.
I would have listed all of the sites included and listed how many scenes they each have, but there are several sites on this network that just have scenes from the other sites on them. The site DTFSluts has scenes from James Deen and Analized on it. The site Your Mom Does Porn has scenes from at least 4 of the other network sites. I'm not looking to give them any extra credit.
The whole network has 1,699 scenes. When I had added them up going by each site it was over 3,000, that should add some perspective to how many scenes they are sharing between their sites.
There are some scenes I liked. It seems like the older scenes are not quite as "me, caveman" as the newer scenes.
The quality of the videos is good except for the random 720p max scene they throw in. The oldest scenes on the network have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The photos are also what I think are studio photo sets, they are small, but those focus on the female model before the scene starts. You get to see how pretty she is before the scene ends. Maybe that's a porn conspiracy? Women that watch this porn are not going to be willing to do these acts. The models go from 7-10 to 1-3. Some of them look like they got drunk and decided to stick the big end of the wine bottle up their butt, fell asleep in that position and woke up with a hangover and a 4 inch diameter wine bottle in their butt.
I know there is a market for this type of porn. There's nothing wrong with that. I admit, I laugh and heckle the small dick porn sites like on Pure CFNM.
Which is what the guys on this network remind me of. They were once laughed at by a woman and now it's their turn.
There are various disclaimers and warnings on the videos. I didn't think the actual sex was that hardcore for the disclaimers to be needed, but it seems to be more about the treatment of the women. The most common disclaimer talks about consent, probably should say, "We didn't tie this woman up and fill her with roofies."
Some of the sex is quite good. Some of the women look like they could have added 3 more guys and they wouldn't have cared. There is a light at the end of the tunnel, I really tried to work an anal joke in, the site Big Daddy POV has some solo scenes for jerk off instruction. I thought those were good and those work just as much for women as men. Though I do think they go overboard with this site's production values. Most of the models are dressed in pink, in a pink bedroom with little glittering lights behind them, some are hugging their teddy bears. I can see a site like Nubiles doing that since their models look 18-19, but some of these models on Big Daddy POV look in their 30s.
Maybe the most important part to know and it's why I also reviewed the James Deen site is more than 50% of the total videos come from the James Deen site which kind of deflates that 16 sites included sales pitch.
If you're really into the more dominant male style of porn you'll probably like this. I'm not even against dominant male porn. I just thought they could have executed everything a little better. Bringing moans into screams with any sex act can be very arousing. Bending a woman's arms up to the back of her head, slapping her, maybe even a few eye pokes in there, trying to fit your dick and fist in her at the same time is just a little too much for me. |
|
04-26-20 02:35am
Replies (1)
|
Review
54
|
Fully Clothed Sex
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A fetish-dominated site on a network that keeps changing.
The scenes often feature full sex from start to finish in full clothes. You can learn some sneaky tips for making it work in clothes.
The women on here are beautiful. It has a heavy emphasis on Eastern European women. The guys are okay, a few are not much to look at.
There is a lot of content on just this site within this niche. They also have a site called, Fully Clothed Pissing. It looks like they film the pissing part either before or after the sex scene. It is usually the same models in the same clothes.
I think it's a niche that women are really into -- cum on clothes, they have a lot of scenes with the cumshot going on the woman's skirt, her pants and it's one of the selling points for me. |
| Cons: |
Tainster is the network, but it is now in a network called SINX. It adds more content than just Tainster, but it also comes with a lesser known biller.
Some of the guys are just ugly and I don't think it would be a subjective opinion. I'm not that picky.
No dates on the videos. The only way you can tell the newer ones is by the video resolution offered. |
| Bottom Line: |
Tainster has had a lot of changes over the last 10 years. It was one of the first networks I joined. It was known as Eromaxx back then. The switch to Tainster didn't change anything. This switch to SINX shows a lot of videos from other sites that are upsells. It does let you select a site like Fully Clothed Sex and just see the content from it.
These scenes have been a turn-on for me since my first porn experiences. The cum on clothes just seems like something everyone that has had sex has experienced at least once -- and these women love it.
The site works as well as it did under Tainster. The scenes are lined up and I think, from looking at them, they are in order of newest to oldest. What I don't know is if they are releasing new scenes or what their update schedule is if there even is one.
The most recent 286 scenes have "Full HD" 1080p downloading option. That is where it can be confusing. I went as far as their last page of videos and 4 of the 8 have Full HD 1080p. Some of the videos on the "newer" pages don't have Full HD 1080p. The ones with Full HD option offer 720p and 360p as well. There are pictures with every video.
Some of these scenes are a fantasizer's dream come true. Office girls using dildos on each other through the tear in their hose. The "boss" man seducing a young interviewing model into sex with his penis out of the front of his pants, her panties slid over and on top of him.
This is one site that I don't think amateurs would be good at. These models -- though, I only know some by name -- are pros, and they seem to have real fetishes involving these scenarios.
The total amount of scenes is 362. Reading the The Best Porn review from 2015, there were over 400 scenes. This site has been around since 2003. Seeing that none of the scenes look very old, I have to wonder if they've just removed a lot of their older, lower-quality content?
The lower number doesn't hurt it, in my opinion, I would rather have 300 scenes in high quality than 600 with half the scenes in poor quality.
One of the fetishes they do well and a lot on this site is a man/woman having sex while a woman watches and masturbates. Having them all in clothes makes that even better. There are a lot of fetishes being touched on in this site. You have pantyhose, panties, upskirts and voyeuristic watchers.
You do have access to all of the Tainster sites including Party Hardcore and the aforementioned Fully Clothed Pissing. I'm not into pissing scenes, but they do add to the Fully Clothed Sex scenes as you are seeing the same people, in the same clothing, doing something different and kinky.
I won't score it too high just because the missing dates and no update schedule makes me wonder if the site is dead and they're using it is an archive site. If it is, it is still worth it for those with those clothing fetishes. |
|
08-20-19 01:59am
Replies (1)
|
Review
55
|
Genuine Sin
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A-List American pornstars, both male and female
Ability to add comments, mark favorites and rate scenes.
All scenes are at least Full HD
Broad appeal to men, women and couples.
132 videos can be found here.
Great sensual sex scenes
Many female empowerment fantasies |
| Cons: |
4K Is not an option. The best is full HD
Irregular updates. Most recently only one a month
No discount, not even for joining the two sister sites, MixedX and Girls Fuck Girls |
| Bottom Line: |
Sometimes I imagine I am with a boyfriend and we meet a nice couple. I wonder if they would watch while we have sex? Maybe they would go for swapping? Maybe a female friend and I might stumble on a couple we know, who are going at it? Maybe I meet a guy and I just want to be in charge and get what I want from him. Sometimes I have a fantasy about sex at work or the gym.
These and much more that I might, but probably would not do in real life, are on the site Genuine Sin. Many of the scenes are older woman/younger guy and some are also older woman with a much younger woman. There are lots of foursomes, scenes with three couples and women doing edging on their man. This is a teasing kind of blow job, where the guy is forced to wait until his woman feels he is ready. In these scenes, the woman starts by orally going after her man who is wearing underwear. She starts by erotically kissing him down there through his underwear, even before she takes his underwear off. Teasing and stopping causes a huge cumshot, which is really important to me in a well done porn scene. I love the idea of female sexual empowerment, stirring my imagination with more than just nice bodies and sex. This site delivers that and more. There are scenes that are interracial black on white, white on black and even a lesbian scene with Asian and white.
The guys are well built and good looking. These are not monster cocks but instead are ones I could imagine actually having enjoyable sex with. The guys are polite and respectful, unlike the men on many other sites. No tough guys, no slapping, choking or forced sex. They are there to please these women and that they do well. For the most part, the cum shots are external, clear and easy to focus on. You see the women getting out the very last drop of cum. Usually there is a delighted, playful look on the women's faces. In many scenes, they lick the cum off their bodies or even off their fingers.
The older women are experienced American MILF age stars that know what they want and make sure they get it. The young ladies are pretty and fresh faced, eager to explore new sexual experiences and push their boundaries. The Latinas on this site are outstanding, however my favorite here is India Summer, a total pro who does sex scenes in a way that you just have to see. I wish I had half her enthusiasm and energy. Even though I am not lesbian, she sure is tempting. She could teach me anytime. To give you an idea of what the site is like, she has four scenes. One is a two couple scene called Kinky Swingers Extreme Sex Party, another is Double Penetrated In Front of Friends who are a nicely dressed couple who only watch, another a mild BDSM scene called The Submission of India Summer, and the fourth is with a black man and is called India Summer Is A Milf BBC Addict.
There are more than 130 videos and the site has been updating at only about one new scene a month. It used to be much more frequent, so I hope it is not stopping. The videos don’t come in 4K, but the best quality is a very satisfying full HD. The downloads were fast enough, so no complaints there. As a site it is pretty easy to figure out and there are tags to help you search.
The same ownership has two other sites, MixedX and Girls Who Fuck Girls. There is no offer of a discount for either or both of these. |
|
10-19-21 12:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
56
|
Girl Girl
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent quality lesbian porn only letdown by no longer updating
All videos can be downloaded in 4K
Picture sets are good and downloadable
Creative scenes that only make it worse that they’re not updating
Small site so it is easy to navigate
All models are knockouts |
| Cons: |
Less than 100 scenes and no longer updating.
I could see some complaining about it being too glossy and glam. |
| Bottom Line: |
Lesbian sites rarely impress me. It is a genre of porn that to me, all but makes itself successful. More than one naked woman in every scene. Women being naughty with other women. The only ones not into that are probably not looking for porn.
The bad news is pretty big. The site isn’t updating and hasn’t updated in over a year. That is a problem. It is still sold as a standalone site. If you are planning on joining the site for full price be aware that you will only get around 80 scenes and nothing else. The good news is that’s really all you can complain about with the site.
The models are cute, pretty, some innocent, all naughty. The clothing ranges from normal clothes to lingerie and the stories for the scenes are realistic enough. There is no download limits and the videos are all available in 4K downloads. There are the usual 1080p and 720p resolutions for downloads as well. The settings are pretty and classy looking. That may be a con to some people. It’s like a lesbian artsy site, but the action is very hardcore for lesbian. The picture sets are well-lit and can be downloaded.
Navigation is simple thanks to the small size of the site. You will have no problem finding what you’re looking for. If you lik glam porn you’ll love these scenes, but if not, you won’t likely like it.
Lesbian porn like this can be confusing. They do a good job of showing the scenes as classy, but the action is anything but classy. There are 69s, anal play, toys and fingers all in a 5 minute segment of a video. The kissing is good and a major focus. There’s very few things sexier than two pretty women kissing passionately.
I would have trouble recommending this site by itself. You would probably get your money’s worth, but if you can add Jules Jordan at a discounted price, it’s a better deal and is the deal I joined. The stories and scenarios add quite a bit of value to the scenes. I still have problems recommending it to anyone except lesbian fans. I really wish they would restart the site and add new scenes. It would be a site that easily pushes a high 90s score if it was still updating, but as it is, I feel comfortable giving it an 85. |
|
01-10-23 02:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
57
|
Girls Fuck Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Billed by Segpay which is very safe to use.
Inexpensive at only $14.95
Mostly American pornstars that I like
Links to discounts for other sites
Professional camera work and directing |
| Cons: |
It has not updated since May.
Only 35 videos
Only three download options and the best is Full HD
There are tags for searching for what you like
Does not come with other sites |
| Bottom Line: |
Despite the fact that there are only 35 videos and there may never be another update, I really like this site. Although I have never been with a woman sexually, I find the idea very appealing. I find most lesbian porn sites are not to my taste with a lot of overacting and fake moaning. In those mainstream sites, the production values are low and the appeal to women is nonexistent. In contrast you find here that the actual sex is very realistic and a joy to watch, with nice production values. Instead of the ordinary quality you see In most porn, these scenes look like they were made by video professionals. A few even have simple, but interesting special effects. The scenes are explicit but not overdone sleazy. There is a lot of licking, toy play, scissoring, fingering, strap on play, pussy shaving and even the use of a sex machine by the two women.
I recognized many of the models as they are Americans known for lesbian sex on other sites. The younger models are fresh with enthusiasm and seem to really enjoy the scenes. These younger models are portrayed as innocently exploring sexuality either with other young models or with older more experienced women. Some themes portrayed here are college age schoolgirls enjoying each other, sorority members getting it on, boss with younger employee, babysitter with mother. This gives the scenes an appeal that is using a uniform fetish, a college fetish, older/younger lesbian as well as dominant/submissive roleplay as there is also some light BDSM. The most popular scene is Girls Naughty Naked Night Out, which is a four way. Four young ladies of college age go to a strip club, where they laughingly enjoy seeing a stripper on a pole. They give her tips, but she does not strip or get in on the fun once it starts. What you see are women in short skirts, well made up, who are going out for fun as none have a date that night. This sounds like a fantasy I might have, or was something I might have done when I was younger. They come across as a group of good friends who know each other well. I could imagine myself having been in that group, getting giggly and silly along with them. This is porn that captures my imagination and is not just made to satisfy men’s fantasies about imaginary lesbian encounters. They do what comes naturally as a result of having been friends first. You can see the action evolving as the heat builds. They got hot and then I got hot. What could be better than that?
My only complaints include a minor one. When you open a page on the site, the video starts on autoplay. If you want faster downloading you have to turn it off. A much more serious matter is that the site appears to not be updating any longer. With 35 videos, I would appreciate a lot more. I want to ask if they have any plans to keep the site actively growing, but the only customer service links were for billing problems. What you do get is well worth joining for. |
|
09-05-21 06:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
58
|
Girls Out West
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Australian porn with I think all amateurs.
1,051 models and they vary in looks, body size, shape, hairy, shaven, very unique site in that regard.
At the time of the review, 4/29, 2020, they have 4,358 scenes and 2,692 photo sets.
Easy sign-up and cancel with Epoch.
Six new videos per week and 1 new photo set per week.
Deep advanced search that gives you over 100 tags/actions to filter.
Blend of solo, lesbian and boy/girl scenes.
Behind the scenes videos and photos. |
| Cons: |
As appealing as their blend of models are, I also would think at least some of those models would be unappealing to some. Especially those against hairy.
Boy/girl section is much smaller than lesbian or solo with only 252 boy/girl scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I figured I went outside my comfort zone for long enough. I enjoy these sites with amateurs, models with imperfections, models that probably would not be called models by some people. One of the first things I noticed is the scenes have a fun feeling to them. I do not get the feeling these models are under immense pressure like you see on some sites. I also do not feel like many of these young women are very shy, either.
I think the pros give a good overview of how much content this site has, and I didn’t know any of the models by name. Is it a pro or con that you’re probably going to need to stay on as a member for more than a month? It gives me the feeling it would be a good site to join for a year even. They have over a decade of consistent updating.
Before I go much further into the bottom line, I do want to go back to that first con. As a female, I don’t think I’m as critical of models looks as most guys are, but even saying that I would say there are 15-20% of these models that I didn’t find attractive. The other side of that is you’re going to find models that are very attractive, and you’ve never heard of them.
Most of the content here is what I would call female-friendly. It’s not softcore solo or lesbian. These are real women masturbating and as we all know when us non-porn stars masturbate; we are going for the fastest orgasm. It does lend itself to more expressive, more vocal, would sloppy be a negative word to use? I don’t mean it as such. I just mean this isn’t the masturbation you’re used to seeing on a major site. The lesbian scenes go from looking like real lesbians having sex with each other to the more playful lesbian scenes where the women look inexperienced.
You’re going to get random settings which I enjoy in porn. The solo scenes might be on an exam table, in a garage, on the bed, on the floor, in a cubicle, dinner table, outdoors and everywhere I think sex is possible.
The video quality is very good. They have 4K going back to 2017 and unless I missed something, all video scenes have 1080p, 720p and 480p. This includes remastering some of their “classic” scenes.
The boy/girl scenes are more inconsistent. It seems like some of the couples are possibly real couples, while others aren’t quite as interested in each other.
As a whole, this site does it a lot right. There are amateurs that are doing a good job of looking like pros. Some excellent solo videos and they explore a lot of fetishes from peeing to squirting to possibly the biggest collection of hairy models (body hair). I will have to join it again in the future. That could be its biggest con. It’s a lot of content to take in over one month. |
|
04-29-20 01:16am
Replies (1)
|
Review
59
|
Girlsway
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It’s a lesbian-themed network of five themed sites or series or niches. These niches and sub-niches and genres and sub-genres are starting to become confusing.
As a network it has 2,062 scenes with downloads and downloadable pictures.
The famous and highly-respected Bree Mills produces at least some of this content. I will have some comments on that.
The videos have a lot going for them with up to 4K on the newer ones and most of the scenes have a story.
There are subtitles available for the scenes with female models that do not speak English. I think the scenes that are not English are okay for me, to just stream. It’s hard to watch a porn scene while reading what is being said.
A lot of normal niches are explored on this network: Older/younger being a major one. |
| Cons: |
I just think some of the scenes try too hard to not be porn. That is a downside of having Bree Mills. There are expectations.
It doesn’t matter how good the story is if the models cannot convey the feelings and emotions needed for the story. |
| Bottom Line: |
Who to blame? The producer/writer or porn? That is the only big negative I took from these scenes. I don’t know if porn itself causes the writer to have to limit their stories, which would also include the models’ acting ability. The scenes that I just didn’t get into had a common feeling of the story either tried too much or didn’t even try. That’s probably unfair to judge by. It is a very good network if you like lesbian porn. The stories vary when it comes to quality. From the obvious ones like two friends going to Yoga class, in a woman’s house. Maybe porn does limit that?
The models are all pretty or at least above average. I do believe any blame should be placed on porn. You get scenes that are inconsistent. Some of the stories are ones I watched videos of ten years ago with the same story. That must be it. There is a time period that once passed clears the memory of that story. That is, I believe, the limitation of porn. The scenes that they seem to put the most marketing into are the best ones. I really liked the “Schooled” scene with Brooklyn Gray, Sheena Ryder and Serena Siren, that’s a tongue twister, which is fittingly, on a lesbian site.
The first thing I will point out that I like are the scenes with more than 2 women. They have a lot of 3 or more women scenes. They also have a lot of older women with younger women scenes. I believe that is probably the most realistic fantasy a straight woman has about lesbian sex. I believe we all had that one teacher that was really pretty and was very nice to us. That is a tough part of making lesbian porn. It had to appeal to either straight men or straight women. I do see the majority of the scenes as aimed at men. I was impressed by Casey Calvert. She has a scene called, “Grand Opening” which needed to be a lesbian scene with that name. It has 3 other models in it. It follows the script of the older woman is teaching the younger ones to have lesbian sex.
The network doesn’t specifically call itself a network, but it does have 5 different niches/series. I believe they even limit themselves with trying to follow a set theme. The network has over 2,000 scenes and it is updating at least 10 times per month. There is good value. There is not an avoidance of those repeated stories. I have seen so many porn scenes, lesbian and straight, with the paying off the debt story.
You do get pictures and those are downloadable. Those do look like stills from the videos. A scene that I thought looked really good before watching it, to find it, it wasn’t that good is Every Woman’s Born Different. It has everything going for it except the models don’t seem to be that much into it. I wasn’t familiar with any of the three models in it and it showed. I don’t know a lot of models, but the scene felt like one experienced model with two models shooting their first scene. I did find a humorous discussion about the scenes. The older woman is supposed to be the stepmother to both of the younger female models. Someone asked the question of how that is possible. That would require one of the daughters to be the mom’s real daughter. I didn’t even pick up on that until I read the comments, but that goes into what I’m talking about with the stories. Trying so hard to make the stepfamily niche, then losing all believability in the process, even though the scene is very serious about itself.
The majority of scenes are very good. You just can’t tell based on who is in the scene. You have to jump from one scene to another trying to find one that doesn’t have an overbearing story that the models clearly cannot act out. I’m still going to score it good, but I don’t know if I’m just seeing reality that porn is better as a fantasy. |
|
03-08-22 05:12pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
60
|
Granddadz
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The oldest videos are from a site called Beauty and the Senior
Comes with the super network Adult Prime
The site has 143 videos
Newer updates include 4K as an option
Navigation is good for a network.
Good price for all the content you get. |
| Cons: |
There is no predictable schedule for updates and only four videos have been added so far in 2021
When the erection doesn't remove the wrinkles |
| Bottom Line: |
I have been interested in older men/younger women porn for a few years now. When I lost my hard drive a while back, I also lost scenes from one of my favorite sites, Beauty and The Senior. I recently discovered those scenes on a site called Granddadz. One thing I loved about those videos was that they had a bit of a story that appeals to the imagination. The most unlikely things would happen.
In one memorable scene, an older man sleeping on a bed, completely nude. A great looking young lady spies on him through an open window. She is so overcome with sexual emotion that she comes inside, strips and enters his bed. She is so turned on that she devours his penis as if she was having her last meal and wakes him up in the process. In many other scenes you see the man doing very ordinary things, like sitting on a bench in the park, reading or watching a game on television. The young lady initiates the sex, which I can see as a total fantasy as the man might imagine it happening to him. From the woman’s point of view I see it as a woman sees what she likes and is turned on by using a man as a sex object. Compared to most porn, this a stark role reversal that makes me feel I could have this as a fantasy. Older men are grateful, polite and respectful and that is not common in porn.
For the most part, the women are much better looking than is common for older/younger porn. Some of the guys I have seen on other sites. Most of the cum shots are oral, but that is true for older/younger porn in general. Older guys need a lot of oral stimulation in order to perform.
There are 143 videos on the site and the oldest are from 2014. Those are in very sharp looking High Definition. More recently 4K videos are available as well and there are 51 of those. It is hard to tell if this site will grow as this year in 2021 as only four new videos came online.
This is one of the channels on Adult Prime, which has more than 75. If you are into older younger as a type of porn they do have a few other sites besides this one. Grandmams is a rare type of site in that older women are paired with younger guys. There are 199 videos and a new one has been added once a week. There is another site called Family Screw with 56 videos. In these the parings are also older/younger, but in a fantasy family. Many of these scenes are groups. OldieX has 504 videos and is still updating. |
|
10-19-21 12:49pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
61
|
Grandpas Fuck Teens
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A very fun older/younger site with sort of an identity crisis.
There are 470 scenes, the updates haven’t updated since August 2021.
Newer scenes have 4K downloads.
Most of the females look young and cute, fitting the role well.
Most of the males look older, some are chubby and fit their role well.
Very good downloadable picture sets that focus on the female in a more teasing, glamorous way. |
| Cons: |
Some of the grandpas look similar age to the “teens”. I use my imagination, but only then can barely see a 10 year difference.
No new updates and older scenes are lower resolution quality. |
| Bottom Line: |
Older/younger porn is usually fun for me. I am not for sure why. I don’t recognize most of these older men. Usually, the older/younger genre has known, established porn stars in the male roles. These older guys don’t even use a last name. That raises the sexy factor for me. He must have got so excited about the scene he forgot to write his last name down.
As someone that started my interest in online porn through the site Nubiles, a lot of the females on this site remind me of the types of models Nubiles has. That’s a plus for me. Most of these models look like legitimate 24 years old and younger models. I believe those fit into the “teen” category. There are slim figures, small boobs and the older men look happy just to get to touch these young women.
There is a negative in the use of males that look at most 35. I don’t even watch those scenes unless the female is really cute. There are females on here that look like the makeup person tried to add makeup to make them look younger. I know that sounds backwards, but we are talking pink blush on the cheeks which I believe tries to make a woman look younger. It doesn’t really work and if those women really are in the 18-24 age group, the makeup person needs to stop with the makeup. A few of these females look to be in their late 20s, while the guy in those scenes looks mid-30s. That’s pushing my imagination’s limit. What would be the age difference needed? I think you need to at least show a 30-40 year old difference. I can work with a 20 year difference, even.
This is a large site for this genre with 470 scenes. The updates did stop about 5 months ago. Hopefully, they’re not ending the site’s updates and just maybe taking a Covid break. This is very enjoyable older/younger porn. The pictures add another element with those focusing on the female model and have as many as 150 photos each.
The clothing, settings, productive values, are very good for this genre. The really older men wear everything from lounge clothes to overalls, while the “teens” wear cute outfits that make the scenes more believable. I do believe that is part of the problem with the scenes that have the younger guys. Most are dressed in suits. It looks more like extramarital office sex. Porn niches are now hurting each other! It’s a good site. I would recommend it for fans of older/younger. |
|
02-09-22 06:39am
Replies (0)
|
Review
62
|
Grooby Girls
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
As technically impressive transsexual site as you will ever find.
Unlimited video downloads and photoset downloads.
The videos have offered 4K downloads for nearly 6 years.
Even though the older videos have a lower resolution, they’re not poor.
One of the best sites for solo transsexuals
You can register through Paypal |
| Cons: |
Grooby seems to hold the rights to a lot of transsexual sites. This creates numerous problems I noticed.
Prices are outrageous in 2023 – nearly $40 a month |
| Bottom Line: |
Grooby is undoubtedly the biggest name in transsexual porn.The main problems that come from that are: Seemingly created their own supply and demand pricing. Can separate traanssexuals into more niches (Asian, Black, etc) to require the member to join multiple high priced sites just to see the different races of models. And if you’re like me and want to join multiple sites each month, you’re going to be spending near or even over $100 for 3 Grooby sites even if they give you a discount.
Business Philosophy aside, Grooby delivers exactly what they offer. Real, very attractive transsexuals masturbating and having sex. I like to use Nubiles.net in my comparisons to sites of other genres. Grooby is 99% like Nubiles. On paper, in numbers, in technical comparisons, very few if any sites can compete with them, but the action in the videos does not live up to the high standard the presentation creates. You also are getting standard porn – even if it is transsexuals. Nothing here is pushing the boundaries or moving the transsexual genre forward.
The good news is very few porn fans really care that much about those things. The bad news is the ones who do are usually reviewers. Only Nubiles.net calls for a review this objective. I have to look at Grooby as a site that the average member has never visited before joining. Like it’s their first ever porn site membership and they (the member) is without biases. When you view ths Grooby site that way it’s easily a 95 or higher. When you add subjectivity to the review, the score drops down to the low 80s. It’s just not that entertaining to someone who has joined over 100 sites.
They have provided 4K downloads for nearly 6 years and most everything else can be downloaded in HD. There are no download limits and the photosets are probably the highest quality transsexual photos I have seen. It’s just there are some missing elements I’m used to like some level of sexual tension (good kind). Instead, I’m just loaded down with tons of content that is mostly generic.
The action is either transsexual hardcore sex or solo. There’s not much variety there. Likewise, because Grooby has so many other sites, there’s not much difference in how the models look (race).
For me, this site or several combined Grooby sites could easily approach the 100 score, but just like with Nubiles.net there’s a little something extra that is missing. I’m going with a middle ground between 100 and 85 of 93. If you’re new to the site and porn in general, I could see you scoring it 98-100. |
|
04-12-23 07:33am
Replies (0)
|
Review
63
|
Group Banged
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Updates every two weeks, which is good for a site that has rare videos
Over 140 videos and photo sets in the archives
Uses tags for searching
Download speeds were ok, not the best I have ever encountered.
Navigation works as it should. |
| Cons: |
I don’t speak German and they need subtitles
Many of the women are not much to look at and the guys are not either
The file names are not unique or helpful |
| Bottom Line: |
This site was a bit different from the ones I usually join. The Adult Prime Network has many sites I found interesting and this was not one I was thinking about when I signed up.
My taste in porn is for the women to be attractive, but not necessarily the most beautiful I have ever seen. They just have to be real and have a quality that makes them relatable. I like good looking guys with nice bodies. They don’t have to be carved statues either. I like sex to be energetic, but not a freak show. This site says they use 100% amateurs, and that would work for me.
The site is in German, so I was never any too sure what they all were saying. But, this is porn and models speak with their bodies. I should be able to turn the sound off and still be turned on. I have never joined a German site, but some of these models are not amateurs. My guess was that if the scene description had their name, there must be a reason. Sure enough, if you do a Google search they do actually have pornstars. Mostly they are better looking than the models in the other scenes.
But this is a site specializing in huge gangbangs. Imagine 20, even 30 guys banging a woman. Maybe even more if there are two women involved. The sex is often intense and the scenes long. Some are so long that I can’t call this anything less than a test of sexual endurance. I have to admire the women for doing these scenes, but how many models would be willing to do them? I suspect very few and I think that is why the standard for the attractiveness of the models is low. Many are overweight, a bit over the hill by porn standards, and in general not the best looking. Don’t get me started on the guys. These are not exactly pornstars either. They are not fit, often don’t get hard and many of them have dicks so small that, well you can use your imagination as to what I would say. Many of the guys wear a mask. I understand, but that is not great porn.
What the guys need is a bit of organizing. When they are not in the action, they sit on chairs, stand on the side or in the back. They stroke themselves to stay hard, but mostly it just ain’t happening. What they need is what I once heard called is fluffers. These are women who stay offscreen, and help the guys stay hard. Now that is a job I can have a fantasy about. Hmm. The guys don’t use condoms, but I don’t like them anyway. However in scenes like these I keep thinking about that. If twelve guys just came in her pussy, would you think you should too, without a condom?
Mostly the cumshots are external though and that is ok. I like to see men cumming and the possibilities are great for some interesting scenes. If 30 guys cum, some of that just has to be worth watching. I also liked that many of the models wore stockings or nylons.
As a site, I found it annoying that the videos did not have unique names. Calling a scene 1080p_fullcomplete is not ok. On the other hand there are three options to download and stream videos and the best is Full High Definition. You can make your own clip and the site has 96 already made for you. This way you can skip most of a long video and just focus on a section. I found watching them in a loop to be the way to go, or should I say cum. You also can download photosets or make a slide show. Mostly they are screen shots and the sets have large numbers of photos. I saw one that had 156 and they were a nice 4000x2667.
It was hard to follow all action with so much going on, but I found these videos hit and miss. Some had parts I could watch over and over and some scenes just don’t do it for me. |
|
11-07-21 09:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
64
|
Hard X
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The hardcore site from Empire X, it's one of the better hardcore sites I've been a member of.
Very attractive models for a hardcore site.
Update schedule isn't clear, but they had 8 new scenes in October. There are 661 scenes total.
They have 9 resolutions to download the videos in, ranging from 160p to 4K, the older scenes have 1080p as the max.
Nice photo sets with zip downloads. |
| Cons: |
There's still a feeling of repetitiveness in the scenes.
I don't know if it's a concern, but they went 11 days between the most recent update and the previous one, October 25th and November 5th. |
| Bottom Line: |
I felt the combination of reviewing their softer EroticaX site and this one, the harder HardX site would be an interesting way to compare the sites and styles.
I'm not a huge hardcore fan, but I do like the hardcore on HardX, is it because it has a softer edge to it? I don't think so. Maybe it's the high production quality?
They don't stray too far from their formula on their other sites. They focus on three main themes. The male/female scene, the male/male/female scene and the blowbang type scene where one woman gives blowjobs to multiple guys (more than 5 usually).
The threesome scenes are some of the best threesomes I have seen. You usually get the feeling in a threesome there's too much going on to really show it all, but they do feature dual penetration in most of their threesomes (anal and vaginal) not anal/vaginal and oral. Most of the women seem to really enjoy these scenes which is rare in my experience of viewing threesomes where the women usually look like a deer in headlights.
The blowbang scenes are good even if you do wonder if the woman's mouth gets tired. That's what we practice for when we're doing all that talking!
The male/female scenes seem a lot like the content on EroticaX, which I didn't like as well. There's still not a lot of variation in the setting. Someone with a white couch and white bedroom set is not going to be happy.
There are 661 scenes on this site which is double that of EroticaX and I have downloaded quite a bit more from HardX, the scoring difference between the two might not have been enough. I might have to lower EroticaX's score to show how much more I like HardX.
The navigation and tags work as well as they've marked them. I really don't know how much those tags can be trusted to be accurate. I haven't seen a mention of white couch and it's in every scene.
I think this site would be good enough to join EmpireX just for this site. It's very good overall and I have downloaded nearly 100 scenes from it, most are threesomes.
I do think it's impressive that they get so many very pretty models to be in these hard scenes. I would call it the best reason to join EmpireX, but overall, I do believe they should work on mixing the settings up a little, other than that it's a great deal for all you get. |
|
11-04-19 10:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
65
|
Her Limit
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly anal scenes, many with rimming. There are 161 scenes on the site.
Comes with the LetsDoeIt network of seventeen sites.
I joined through Segpay. You can also use Paypal.
Updates every week.
A lot of anal sex and many scenes have female on male rimming.
Both the men and the women are very enthusiastic. They really burn those calories here.
I rarely watch the interviews on sites, but these were worth watching. |
| Cons: |
Seemingly endless advertising that makes very cluttered web pages.
Two pre-checked cross sales when you first sign up. It is easy to miss them as they are not where you expect to find them. |
| Bottom Line: |
The name of the site refers to the fact that these are professional pornstars that are trying to push the limit of what they have done before sexually. Mostly what they do here is anal sex that is a bit harder than we generally see in anal porn. Many, but hardly all of the scenes are black men with large dark black cocks with white European women. The chemistry and enthusiasm are huge selling points. The female on male rimming on this site is some of the best I have ever seen. The women seemed to like the challenge in doing such hard and enthusiastic anal sex. The guys, well they were big enough that I can see the reason the sex was pushing her limits.
Each scene starts with an interview. Although the models are from many different countries, including the United States and Latin America, most are from Eastern Europe. For many this is the first time I have witnessed them speaking English. They generally have the help of a translator and their English is limited and not fluent. However, you get some insight into their personalities and what they like sexually. Their answers to the questions do not sound rehearsed and I appreciate that.
I saw others here have commented that the site is very sluggish to load and that made me think there was something wrong with my computer. Download speeds were quite variable and unpredictable. After loading several pages I was logged out and had to get back in while losing the page I was looking at.
You have the ability to save scenes as favorites, can vote up or down and can leave comments. There is an excellent sorting system of 55 categories and 336 tags. You can also sort the videos by newest, most viewed and most popular. The site is cluttered with ads. After you log in you get a page with ads before you get to the first member’s webpage. When you reach it, It also has ads. When you first sign up you have to uncheck two cross sells that are easy to miss as they are on the opposite side of the page from where you are entering information. There are four video download options and 1080p Is the best. I wish the site had 4K as an option. In contrast the only photo options 1920x1080 screenshots. The most recent set was only 16 photos.
Updates to the site are posted every week. Her Limit is part of the LetsDoeit network. In total you get seventeen sites that have a total of close to 1700 high quality HD scenes. |
|
08-10-21 03:52am
Replies (0)
|
Review
66
|
Hot Guys Fuck
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The brother/sister(?) site of Bi Guys Fuck. Will need more description to describe the site.
Attractive males and female models. Mostly one on one action.
Large site, but most of the scenes have two videos, one is a behind the scenes. It makes the site seem bigger than it is.
I thought about listing this as the #1 pro. If you join with a gift card it’s cheaper. I used a $17 gift card and received 25 days, that’s 68 cents per day. They offer two paid memberships that are $30 and $40 for 30 days or $1 or $1.33 per day.
Gay men should check this out as well as bisexual men. And maybe women, even though it’s listed as for women porn. |
| Cons: |
The site is glitchy. I clicked join and it took me to the “secret menu”. I clicked join again and it took me to advertisement for their penis pills. I finally got to a join page and joined with a gift card. I don’t trust a site with this many issues.
Don’t stone me for this, but this site is no more directed at women than any other porn site. These seem to be gay and bisexual men. Calling these guys “hot” makes me think it’s aimed at gay men. Most of these guys are not masculine or big, muscular guys. These men are more in the “twink” category. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this after enjoying Bi Guys Fuck last month. Some of the first scenes on Bi Guys Fuck are from Hot Guys Fuck. They have the watermark. That is easily the feeling I get from these scenes. One of the things this site advertises is the men get as much camera time as the women. I don’t know what porn they have been watching, but that’s fairly common unless it’s POV. I will even say the men get too much camera time on this site. Maybe during the cumshot or the moment of penetration. Those are views women like to see. Showing the guy’s face midway through the scene isn’t doing anything for me. I have watched a lot of solo female porn. I don’t even like when the camera focuses on the woman’s face during the scene. I’m paying for porn not headshots.
This is very much a gay/bisexual male site. The sex is as good and believable as most porn sites. You know from watching the scenes that these men are medicated. Every scene has an advertisement for their penis pills. You do get to see very erect men and large cumshots, but when the men are presented as the “eye candy” it kind of removes the interest. I’m not into “pretty” guys. Gay men are. It may say “for women”, but it’s not for me. I’m a traditional woman. I’m nearing 40 and I have known a lot of gay men and watched a lot of gay porn. I wonder if Bi Guys Fuck maybe hurts my view of Hot Guys Fuck. On Bi Guys Fuck it’s normal for the scene to be split into multiple downloads. One of the downloads will be the guys together while the woman watches and masturbates. The other will be one or both guys taking turns with the woman. That is what these scenes remind me of.
There is padding in the site size. There are 2-3 updates per week. One is a behind the scenes video. Maybe those would be more interesting, except, those are 2-3 minutes long. They get 1-2 questions. Those are released as a new update. It’s only updating with a new sex scene every 7-8 days. That’s still not bad. I’m going to say something that I felt while watching multiple scenes from this site. A lot of the guys are prettier than the women and the guys are not that pretty. There are some pretty women on this site, but there is reality in if you put a less physically attractive person with another person, there’s a chance the other person will look more attractive than they really are. I see that in some of these scenes. I do believe everyone on the site is attractive. That would be a 5-6 on a 10 scale. Only a few of the women even reach an 8. They do have those women in more scenes than one.
The videos, from what I am seeing, do not have 4K. Bi Guys Fuck also didn’t have 4K. I don’t have a problem with that. They do have 1080p, 720p and 480p. There are several parts to this site that are going to make most people feel like there’s a hollowness to the site and content. Besides the constant advertising of their penis pills. They also have a “secret menu”. Members are the only people that can see it. It’s just the same thing as the regular scenes. They hype the “someone returns!” Why even do that? It’s gimmicky-feeling. Would I be wrong in saying young gay men are really into surprises and the dramatic return of a favorite? I say that knowing my best friend is a gay man. He has been my friend for 28 years. I know when he was younger, he was very dramatic and he loved surprises. It’s an eh for me.
Even with what I’m going to call a negative sounding review, the site is good, the sex scenes are good. But when half the scenes are useless behind the scenes videos. Every scene has an advertisement to start it about penis pills. I have to go to the secret menu to find more behind the scenes videos. I don’t care about HIS personality or his hobbies. How much longer will women be subjected to these stupid stereotypes? That doesn’t hurt the site that much for me, but I believe for a more obsessive person, it could be really annoying. If they dropped the ads, removed the secret menu and put the behind the scenes videos in their own section, it would be a near 95 site. Instead, there are nearly 800 scenes and what you find out is they didn’t do these behind the scenes videos in their earlier days. What they have done consistently is make sure to show the guy’s butthole. I will also mention the scenes that are two guys with a female, the guys can’t quit looking at each other, their smiles, their dicks, their buttholes. I am going to give it an 85 with major reservations. They have a good site that could be great. |
|
03-08-22 05:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
67
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
99.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It focuses on putting you in a woman’s bedroom or two women’s bedroom and watching them during their most intimate times.
Excellent camerawork that captures the model’s faces at the right times, it’s not always that explicit.
More updates than some networks and it’s just one site. Sixteen so far in April 2022 and it’s only the 11th of the month.
Emotionally charged scenes that will make you forget formulaic.
Real orgasms in under 10-15 minutes that will make you wonder what you’re doing wrong.
Much appreciated tags that are some of the most specific I’ve seen. Aimed at people with obscure fetishes? |
| Cons: |
Some of the videos are under a minute and aren’t masturbation.
Real women from what I can tell that aren’t porn models. That’s going to be a con to some. |
| Bottom Line: |
A site that surprised me a lot. Who knew a porn site could be named prophetically? This site should make anyone feel themselves. There is nothing high-tech with the site. It’s just an older looking site that looks like they decided to let their scenes speak for itself. I haven’t seen many of these niches before. There are scenes that I really liked of women masturbating while watching porn. That’s not something I see much in porn. There are scenes of women in a dark room with some clothes on, all clothes on, no clothes on, masturbating over their clothes, under the clothes and nude. The nice women hop up on their knees and give you a better view. The naughty ones are too busy enjoying themselves and don’t care who is watching or if you’re liking it. It’s almost too real. Possibly too real for some people to like even. Not me and not specifically you, just some.
The tags are an important part to me and part of the reason I’ll come back to the site. When they list “hairy” the woman really is hairy. They even have a tag for “pets”. Which is there for you guessed it. A pet decided to get in the view of the camera. They make sure to tell you there’s no bestiality. The tags include ones like “tattoo free” and “hands on” meaning no sex toys. There are ones for “flush” as a redhead, I know about flush skin. These tags tell you so much more about the parts of porn that people complain more about than those silly stories most sites have on the scenes. There is even a “watching porn” tag. I don’t think any site has this specific of tags.
The quality is surprisingly good. Most of the videos have 720p or 1080p download options. There is a download limit, but I have not reached it. It does seem small at 10 GB per day. But the scenes are short. There’s not much talking in any of the scenes. You get some moaning. And the tag I think really plays to people with fetishes is, “contractions”. That means the woman contracts during orgasm. I try to keep up with everything the tags said to expect. The older scenes are not as explicit as the newer ones. I believe they maybe changed their style of scenes or the women in the scenes changed. Some of these women – I am assuming all are amateurs, really go at masturbating and making sure you see everything. It is a style of porn I am not used to. I noticed there is a quote from a user of that site that says she cried the first time she watched a scene from the site. That could be more normal than we think. This site makes it very clear that these women want to be filmed, want to enjoy themselves without being insulted or stereotyped. You end up with some very good performances.
It may still fall short for some people. The only story is these women want to orgasm. There’s no stepdad is watching, and mom is with stepbrother in the shower. It does seem like a very different type of porn than we are used to. It looks more like a woman decided to get naked and said, “Okay, turn the camera on. I’m ready!” There are scenes that have more than one person and those have some talking. They even have a tag for talking. I just can’t explain how important those tags are and the best feature of the tags, if you scroll over the tag, it tells you what it means. Like “Tummy Girls” that means the woman masturbates some in the video while facing down usually with her butt up in the air. It even gives you some educational tidbits like, “20% of women say they masturbate facing down sometimes.”
I don’t know about recommending it. I would, but I have heard things from porn fans. Things that made me want to find different porn. This site really does that for me. I am sure on the score too. |
|
08-09-22 09:56am
Replies (1)
|
Review
68
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It’s hard to call this site underrated, but it really is.
Sister-site to I Feel Myself and Beautiful Agony
Photocentric site that does have some videos, too
You can download the photos and videos
Pretty, amateur models
Big site that’s old enough to be legal (over 20 years) |
| Cons: |
I am sure one reason it’s not as popular as it should be is the focus on photos
Models are not only amateur, but also natural and that means some are hairy |
| Bottom Line: |
I mentioned this site being underrated based on no new member reviews in over 10 years. I remember reading the reviews that are still here, back in 2010 or so. I was a fan of I Feel Myself and that led to me giving I Shot Myself a try. Now that I think of it, I wouldn’t be surprised if the name of the site possibly has turned people away. I do remember when we would say self-shot picture instead of selfies.
For me, this is one of those sites that’s polarizing to the general porn loving population. That’s where I’m going to draw a line. Being a member has made me curious about the possibility of a site like this one, being relevant in 2023. Would there be a market for a site like this one? I have always heard and even experienced, to an extent, the cyclical nature of porn, but when we’re usually discussing something being cyclical, technology isn’t a major part of that. In this case, technology is not a major part of it, it’s the bottom line (sorry, had to do it).
It’s clear to us that are old enough to remember early 2000s porn that pictures were preferred in the late 90s, early 2000s. The file sizes were much more acceptable and doable with even dial-up internet. See the question it leaves us with? Did pictures fail against videos just because people wanted newer technology or do people find videos to be superior quality? The twist to this is I just think people have become more desensitized to sex and some will argue, more open, to sex in general.
I’m glad I’m just reviewing this site and not trying to figure out any kind of truth in why pictures lost popularity. This site hasn’t changed much and I can see why some would complain about that. Then again, it still does exactly what it says it’s going to do. It offers real, amateur models posing nude and pleasuring themselves. The pictures you can download are excellent quality and you’re not going to see many “dumb photographer” photos. There’s more realism and believability from these photos than you’ll see on the professional photography sites.
Models are typically young (18-24), but not 100%. The site is based out of Australia and I personally, have liked every Australian porn site I’ve joined. There is a difference between the culture these models are from compared to US and UK/Euro models. The models show real enjoyment in being naked and in front of a camera. You really can’t find much to complain about. There are nearly 1,000 videos and 12,000 photo zips.
Everything about the site is different than what you’re used to from a porn site and while that can be a negative, it also can be a positive if you take the time to enjoy the content. |
|
12-12-23 09:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
69
|
Immoral Live
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
No download limits
Part of very large Blowpass Network of five sites
Inexpensive because of the Pornusers discount
Porno Dan is a fun guy to watch with a great personality
Beautiful quality 4K downloads that are very fast
Filmed live so it has a feel to it that makes it very real |
| Cons: |
Doesn't seem like something to complain about, but the site is so large. It feels like it should be a separate site.
Camerawork is a little off at times. Probably due to the live part. |
| Bottom Line: |
When we talk about unusual porn, we often pay a site a compliment by saying it is unique. We sometimes also say more unique or most unique. That does not really make much sense to me, but I don’t know what word to use to describe this site. Immoral Live is not immoral in my book and I did not have a chance to see any of the updates when they were live.
When talking about porn in general, unique means the sex act is rare, maybe even taboo or extreme. Here the sex is not all that crazy, but it is fun. The unique part is how it gets there.
The main guy here is Porno Dan, a reasonably good looking guy with a very average dick. By porn standards, he is not much. Most porn studs are better looking, bigger, and full of themselves. He is a stark contrast as he is just a regular guy with a style that makes for the most unique natural porn. He laughs, he jokes, he makes the women relax and really knows how to turn the charm on. Make a woman laugh and you are 90% of the way to great sex in real life or in porn. He does not expect them to do anything he does not do. He eats pussy as well as the most ardent lesbian, with gusto like it is his last meal, and he eats ass too if that helps. His style allows the women to let out that sexual side, that part of them that even pornstars don’t often show. Instead of directing, they have ownership of the action. He motivates them, he does not order them, let alone micromanage them. I have seen them say no, or say do her now or I need a break. Other sites should take note and imitate what works well here.
The site has been around for a very long time and many different approaches to porn have been tried. From 2011 to 2014 he had a single pornstar per update where he used a wheel of fortune to see what sex was going to happen. It was called The Wheel of Debauchery and it was both playful and hot. My favorites were the updates with Nicole Aniston and the one with Sara Vandella. You had the chance to see two pornstars and their personalities like never before.
More recently I was impressed by a few scenes with hot Latinas Serina Gomez and Amy Amor. They did every sex act I can imagine without being downright degrading and did their scenes like they enacting the dreams of their lifetimes. It came across as exactly what they were in the mood to do sexually.
Most of the stars on the site are well known American pornstars of several different races, many I recognized as leading names in the industry. A few were European as I recognized Lady Dee who is a staple if you have ever joined any European sites.
I found the site very easy to use. There are nearly 2300 videos and that leads me to a con that is more of a pro. I want more. I want a new update every day. I want more hours in the day so I can have time for all the great quality scenes available here. Lately the updates are several a month, but not on an exact and predictable schedule. In January there were six. Dan is not in every scene and I want every scene to have him in it. He is now in an age range where he is older, grayer and oh so much more sexy.
When you log in, you can select from among the five in the Blowpass Network. As you can guess from the name, the other sites focus on blowjobs for the most part. As far as I am concerned, I joined for this site and the others are top quality extras. I can honestly rate this two thumbs up and say I love it. |
|
02-09-22 06:18am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
70
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
I don't think it's a conspiracy. I also don't think it's coincidence that his critical words are only to female members. My previous reply while sarcastic in tone wasn't sarcastic. With him being an older man, I do believe he believes women shouldn't be here reviewing with the men.
|
04-28-20 09:11pm
|
Reply
71
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
I replied but received an invalid screen. The site must have timed out.
I didn't say what he said was fake. I am aware of the accusations. The beginning of my review says I read a story about James Deen years ago and how he was the boy next door in porn. The story is still online. James Deen boy next door it's on abcnews.
The problem I have is with him calling me naive. It's not the first time he has said something like this to me. I reviewed a site called Fucking Glasses and gave it a 65. I signed up for a full membership at full price and they only gave me trial access. They didn't respond to my emails. LKLK replied, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them." I could download 2 scenes. The site later apologized and fixed the problem. I raised the score by 20 points.
He had no problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site.
He doesn't tell the other members to overcome their bitterness when they're getting ripped off.
Maybe that's just me being naive? I should stand in the other room while the men talk? Maybe I'll find the word misogynistic in the dictionary while waiting to be allowed to have an opinion.
|
04-27-20 11:20am
|
Reply
72
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
There's more to this than whether what he said is fake or not. I rated this site 36th of 42 sites I have reviewed. The ones below it are mostly sites that ripped me off. Yet, he calls me naive. The comment I made about James Deen size was an insult. It's also a reality in the field I work in that some women do lie. If accusations matter that much, maybe a search of the internet for, "Porn producer accused of abusing models" should be done? There are 1.7 million results. There's just a feeling from me that LKLK has a problem with women reviewing.
In a previous review of Fucking Glasses, he called me bitter, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them."
I had scored that site a 65 because I paid full price and they only gave me trial access. It went from being able to download all scenes to only being able to download 2 scenes. The site also wouldn't reply to emails until I posted the review. They then replied to the emails and apologized saying it was a sign-up error. They extended my account for another month and I raised their score to 85.
Here's the question. Why didn't LKLK or his other account have a problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site? Which was posted during the time the accusations were fresh (2 years ago).
Why doesn't he reply to reviews or comments that are getting ripped off and tell them to overcome their bitterness?
If I wasn't so naive, I would say he's a little misogynistic towards women reviewing porn.
|
04-27-20 11:06am
|
Reply
73
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I'm naive?
What do you call the models that based on what you've said here chose to do a scene with a man known to abuse women in the scenes? Surely they would know it. And what do you call a man of your age that believes slapping and choking is some kind of terrible form of abuse? There are women that love being slapped and choked during sex.
What I can do is put you in contact with the agency I work for. We have entire days we work with abused women. I've been doing it for 10+ years. I've seen women with 2 inch deep rope burn scars around their necks that can't talk. Women with their skin melted by battery acid. Women with their legs broken behind their heads. I don't know what it is about this site that makes everyone a know-it-all. Maybe I am being naive about why you reply since that gets you more tickets in the raffle? Stick to the political nonsense. You know nothing about abused women.
|
04-26-20 07:46am
|
Review
74
|
James Deen
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Straightforward, gonzo style porn featuring James Deen.
846 scenes with new scenes added regularly, but not on a set schedule.
Photos, screencaps and videos can be downloaded.
Videos go up to 4K, some oddities in the video quality specifications.
Mostly rough sex if you're into that.
Blend of scenes which will be in cons too. Male/female, threesomes, casting, etc... |
| Cons: |
This seems like some kind of best of James Deen site. There are scenes from other sites and other studios and scenes from JamesDeen.com. This causes the next con.
The video quality varies from scene to scene. Based on user comments some of the scenes are very old and are being "found" one comment says, "Great find", it is one of the newest scenes released, but tops out at 720p.
I was only a little familiar with James Deen. The scenes are as much about him putting what looks like wrestling holds on women as sex.
Navigation is poor. |
| Bottom Line: |
I once read an article about James Deen being porn's "boy next door". I remember the article well. It talked about how women loved being in scenes with him because he was gentle and so nice.
So, what happened? You know you're going to get a scene that might be harsh when it has a 20 second warning before the scene starts that explains everyone in the scene is a consenting adult, no one is being forced and people watching should not try this at home. In one scene, he has the woman's arms pulled up behind her back while bending her over a sofa.
It's not that the scenes are bad. It's more like a feeling that you know what's going to happen in every scene. She's not going to moan enough from the sex so he's going to bend her arms behind her head or slap her.
He's really not as obnoxious as I expected. It does seem like he gets off on the woman feeling pain, but other than that, it's very basic and straightforward sex. He really doesn't look big enough to seriously hurt anyone. I just was expecting some of that content of the "boy next door". It's more like the guy you picked up at the bar.
There are tags, clickable model names and that's the limit of the navigation. The site could be put together better. It looks like the most time spent was on the terribly written scene descriptions like, "He continued fucking her from behind as he pull her by the hair and neck. Halfway through it, he pins her down and gets power fucking to the next level. It may be a rough fucking for Sadie, James was nice enough to lick her fuck holes from time to time." That is about 1/8th of the scene description.
The biggest problem is the scenes are from different sites. I even saw one from Bang.com and it says on it, "Exclusive Bang.com scene" on James Deen's site. This does make the quality of the scenes vary throughout the site.
The time of the scenes also varies greatly from 19 minutes to 55 minutes. If you like James Deen and like rough sex, especially anal, you would probably like this site. For me, it's an okay site with some good scenes thanks to the women in the scenes.
You can download videos, photo and screencaps. The video quality is hard to describe or list since they are blending in James scenes from other sites. One of the newest is with a model that has bios up saying she retired in 2014. Maybe the Coronavirus is causing them to bring in these scenes from other sites?
You could do worse than this site, but I think your odds would be just as good to do better. |
|
04-25-20 09:36pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
75
|
Jeff's Models
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Frequently updating BBW site that intrigued me.
Large site (no pun intended) with 913 scenes and updates 3 times per week.
Will need a further explanation from me based on my body size, but it’s enjoyable to see full-figured women enjoying themselves sexually and men that enjoy sex with them.
Each scene comes with a video and photo set. The videos are downloadable as are the photo sets.
Navigation is simple and works. There are 237 female models on the site.
Really enjoyed the lesbian scenes and threesomes. Many preconceived notions are shattered, especially about flexibility. |
| Cons: |
You will see this in my summary/bottom line, I look at a site like this as one with a chance to create a positive view of different body types and sizes, therefore, some of the scenes could be named better than they are. Will give examples in the summary.
The disheartening feeling I feel towards myself for thinking I should expect less than stellar performances from these ladies. They will surprise you if you believe that. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have heard that at least some attention, whether negative or positive, is better in marketing than no attention. I wouldn’t have heard of this site if not for the recent comments, here on PU, left about it and can’t say I ever thought about watching BBW porn before this.
Not to go too far into my personal life, but I have talked about it a little in my reviews and am not ashamed to even joke about it. I’m only 5’1” and weigh between 98 and 110 pounds. I’m the joke all the boys liked to make in high school, “The carpenter’s dream: Flat on both sides and ready to be nailed.” It’s no surprise, I can relate and connect mentally and emotionally to women in the BBW category. The first thing to know is there is no way I know any of these models or if they are pros. I haven’t watched BBW porn before. This is all new to me.
My con about the naming of the scenes is possibly my therapist-side showing. This is a chance to give BBW models a positive image, but some of the scene titles just make me wonder if the image boost even matters to the site. It should since it would create more interest from potential members. Like most porn sites, the person naming the scenes believes they’re going to one day be a literary visionary with titled like, “Plumpers Behind Closed Doors” and “Sizable Sapphic Scenario” and maybe those do lend themselves more to the creative and catchy sounding titles, but those are offset with, “Fat and Fucked Up the Butt” and “She’s Fat and Loves to Fuck”. It just seems like something like, “Amazing Amber Loves to Fuck” would be better since these models already have a potential image problem with viewers. Add some enticement, not take away.
That is a minor gripe, but hopefully is one they can think about and use. It’s not going to cost anything extra to try and be a little more positive with titles for scenes. The site updates an impressive 3 times per week and with each of those updates containing a video and photo set there is plenty here to keep you busy. I was surprised to see the site has 913 scenes. Is BBW porn just not marketed at all? I’m thinking as a skinny woman there’s probably a static, built-in crowd/audience for BBW porn like there is for skinny. The videos can be downloaded and I haven’t seen anything about a limit. The oldest scenes on the site include a HD 720p download option and the newest scenes offer 1080p, 720p and 480p downloads. The photo set downloads have pictures with a resolution of 2000x3000 and are quite flattering. These are not screenshots from the videos. These are photos that have the ladies posing, smiling, twirling their hair and just being pretty.
I want to give the males in the scenes credit for their “believable” love of BBW models, but come on guys, you’re overacting in some of these scenes. I don’t expect an Oscar-worthy performance, but your overacting takes away from your sincerity. The guy in the newest scenes is an older man (sorry if that’s not true) and he does a good job of making me and the models feel like he loves their curves, touching, kissing, feeling, squeezing, he’s very good for this genre of porn.
The sex is standard-fare by porn standards. The content filter is very good for helping you find your preferences. Nearly 100 of the scenes feature anal sex. I wish they had more of the lesbian scenes, but like I said, the man in the newer scenes seems to really be enjoying himself, so he’s probably keeping all the action for himself. I do find that the filter isn’t completely accurate. I can show that this easily. Searching in the filter for gangbang produces one scene titled, “The Biggest Bang”. Looking at the scenes I downloaded, there is one titled, “A Star is Gangbanged” Maybe it’s just one missed scene/tag, but the easy navigation makes it relatively easy to see all the previews of the 900+ scenes.
I don’t believe this site will or maybe even should appeal to everyone. It is nice to see that the BBW niche covers quite a range of “bigger” women sizes. Some don’t look much bigger than what we would call average to chubby, while others are obviously big-boned and genetically larger framed. The sex is as believable as any hardcore site and there’s no humiliation or insults. It’s fun, happy, porn. These scenes are of a good length (around 30 minutes) and feature some interviewing, talking and questions in some of the scenes. It’s a good reminder that sexy is not a one-size fits all word. Some of these women exude confidence and it’s quite empowering watching them perform. |
|
11-07-21 09:26pm
Replies (0)
|
|
