Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 1 Pass For All Sites network. Membership in any one site gives you access to all the sites.
-30 sites in the network, covering a wide variety of niches. The main theme is teens.
-Unlimited streaming
-Unlimited downloads
-Video definition offered in 360p through 2160p.
-The site has 255 videos. Plus matching photosets.
Cons:
-Slow update rate. Site averages less than 1 new video per month.
-Slow, irregular update rate for the network: anywhere from 0 to 5 new videos per month.
-The "Recent Updates" page has posted dates for the videos, but there is no posting date for most of the videos or photosets in the members area.
-Most of the sites in the network are not updating.
-Most of the models speak Russian. But after watching Russian porn for many years, I've learned that "Aaaahhh", "Uhhhhhh", and other moans and groans sound alike in Russian, English, German and Spanish. The Japanese sex moans and groans are different: they sound like the girls are crying, which takes getting used to.
Bottom Line:
The site theme is teachers fucking their young students.
The main attraction of the site and network is the level of attractiveness of the models.
Models are teens or in their twenties.
If you're into teen porn models, you've seen many of these girls at other teen sites, such as Lets Doe It, Joymii, Metart network, Teen Mega World network, Nubiles, Wow network. I mean, these girls are showcased all over the internet at teen sites. They are attractive to lovely, and they are worth watching in action.
The action is mainly one girl with an older man, or sometimes two girls with an older man. The older man can be anywhere from his thirties to early fifties. Not a lot of real older grandpa types. The guys are supposed to be teachers or tutors, so it makes sense that they aren't the real older guys found on some old/young sites.
The main reason the girls are cute is because of their youth. But they are also chosen because they are naturally attractive. Firm, tight bodies, the smile of enjoying life before they've been beaten down by disappointments.
The plots are minimal. The girls are supposedly horny, and start groping their tutor/teacher on the slightest excuse. Or the tutor whips out his cock because he wants to get his rocks off. I mean, these are Russian stunt cocks, and they know the girls are eager to suck cock or get their pussies fucked (Russian porn models are not only cute, they've bypasssed fake shyness and are willing and eager to have sex).
So this isn't glamcore, but straight hardcore teen/older man sex.
I've read that many movie stars became actors because they were shy as children.
And even when these actors become world famous, they are still shy in their private lives.
Maybe that's the reason Russian teens go into porn: to overcome their fears of sex.
On camera, Russian teens can put on a great show.
And even if most of them aren't great actors, with a minimal plot, there's very little acting required, beyond moaning and groaning to show how excited they are when getting fucked.
Which is good, because that eliminates the need for the porn writer to think up meaningful plots.
The basic premise is: you have a teen girl, who is supposed to be studying with a tutor: And then, after a few minutes, BAM, the girl is sucking his cock, or getting screwed.
The cuteness of the models, their enthusiasm for sex, obviates the need for plot.
And the older guys are lucky to be able to fuck these cuties and get paid for it.
I'm giving the site a score of 93. You get a large site (255 videos and matching photosets), plus access to about 30 other teen-oriented sites. There are 5 sites featuring old/young in the network, with other sites featuring virgin sex, anal sex, lesbian, cocksucking, baby sitters, etc.
The main draw of the site and the network is the level of attractiveness of the teen models.
Navigation is basically simple.
I wish the content had posting dates, because it would be nice to see if the model is still active, or if the content was filmed years ago.
But if you're into teen porn, this site will give you plenty of teen starlets.
If you enjoy the old/young niche, you get 5 sites.
And if you don't like old/young, you still get maybe 10,000 other teen videos in 25 other sites.
Tushy (and other related sites like Black.com) now has a pre-access web page that checks if you are a robot before allowing you to open the normal Tushy.com web page.
I don't know if the site is being attacked by hackers.
But it seems strange, and disappointing, that a porn site has to defend itself against malicious attacks.
You get the same 4 sites with a new or old membership.
They have added 2 new sites, but they are separate from the 4-site-membership.
I have no idea how much content the 2 new sites have.
They seem to be using most of the same models as from the 4-site combo, and the same type of high-gloss video-shooting style.
But the two new sites require a separate membership from the 4-site combo.
Check your email.
I sent you an email with discounted prices.
Also sent a separate email suggesting you check with Vendo (the listed biller) to make sure you're getting access to all 4 sites.
On the join page, the only site listed is Ultra Films.
But, technically, I am only a member of Wow Girls, with access to all 4 sites. That's the way it's set up by the Wow network. That what they told me, after I joined. The join details don't explain the difference, or even specifically what you are joining, as far as I remember.
Sent you the email with the link for reduced join prices.
Sent you a separate email, suggesting you contact Vendo to make sure you are getting access to all 4 sites, and not just one site.
Send me a short note to:
LAREN00 @ YAHOO.COM
The characters after LAREN are zeros, not the letter o.
I will send you an email, with the attached email that offers a low-priced sub to the 4 sites.
$9.95/month
or
$69.95/year
The email works for me.
You might have to clear cookies on your computer.
Or not.
But the email that has a hot link that opens a page at Ultra Films.
There's a hot link, upper right corner, "Join Now", that opens a new page with the low prices.
On the first page, it says the offer is for the 4 sites.
But on the join page, it only shows Ultra Films.
So you should contact the billing agent, to make sure you're getting all 4 sites.
The billing agent is Vendo.
Call them on the phone, or if there is live chat option.
I used them once, and they were helpful.
But the join page only shows Ultra Films.
So check, before you join.
You send me an email, I will have your email.
The PU email system is not reliable.
Messages I sent, or should have received, got lost.
I sent you the link to join the 4 sites:
$9.95/month, or
$69.95/year.
Check your email. I used the PU internal email system.
If you don't get the email (sometimes the PU internal email system does not work), reply to this message here, and let me know.
I'll send you the link or email a different way.
On second thought, tell me whether you get the PU email or not.
And if you joined.
I think $69.95/year is a fine price for access.
You should have gotten a refund from the sites.
Other people I spoke with said they got all 4 sites.
i did not think your reply was demeaning in any way.
Just a wish that the site/network hadn't deleted a lot of old content.
And, in my opinion, a lot of the old content still held value.
I think they deleted the old content for housekeeping reasons: less content means less to manage.
I agree that they deleted a lot of content produced years ago.
And, depending on each person's tastes, some of it was worth keeping.
My best guess is they were trying to upgrade the network by dropping older content that they thought was of lower quality: lower definition or less popular or whatever.
But I still feel the network is worth joining, as one of the best hardcore teen networks, because of the attractiveness of the models.
That's my opinion, of course.
I'm impressed by the low membership price they've offered: $70/year for 4 sites.
I was paying $120/year for the 3 sites.
Plus, I forget the exact figure, but Ultra Films cost me around $90/year for when I joined.
And these porn companies don't reward you for loyalty.
If you are stupid enough to keep renewing at your join price, they will charge you that, even when they are offering new members a far lower price.
So I think I was paying over $200, for the 4 sites, when I read that you could get the 4 sites for $70/year.
Which made me realize how stupid I was by just renewing my membership automatically. How much money I was wasting.
But that was my fault. Other people will often take advantage of you, if you don't watch out. That's reality.
So I think that $70/year is a bargain.
A lot of great content has disappeared in internet heaven, by porn companies who've gone out of business.
Again, that's life. But there is also a lot of what I think is good to great content that is being produced today.
Some of these models are cute or attractive or lovely or gorgeous.
So if some older content is no longer available, you have to find newer content that you find appealing.
The internet is huge. There's a ton of content that should fit your tastes. Whatever your tastes.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-I want to thank PU member Avory for pointing out that Ultra Films/All Fine Girls/Wow Girls/Wow Porn often offers a special discounted membership of $70/year for access to all 4 sites. I was paying a much higher price to access those sites, until I found a similar offer.
If you join a site, quite often they will charge you higher prices (or the same price as when you joined, instead of giving you the lower prices they offer to newer members).
-For about the last 2 years, if you join any one of the following 4 sites, you get access to all 4 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films.
-I was paying over $100 for access to the three sites, All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn. Plus, I was paying for a separate membership to Ultra Films. So I consider $70/year for access to all 4 sites a bargain, especially since the 4 sites are top teen porn sites in the internet.
-The main attraction of the sites is the catalog of models:
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
these girls (late teens, early 20s), range from cute or attractive to lovely. You don't get better than these girls. Some sites (like X-Art, or MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios or other fine porn sites) do have an amazing catalog of lovely models, but none of them outshine the models at the Wow network + Ultra Films.
-The quality of the videos and photosets at the 4 sites is top of the line: mainly crystal clear images of these lovely girls. In living color. Well lighted. Good sound control.
-So you can drool over these images in the privacy of your own home (or apartment, or wherever you wish. Except not on the bus or train or at work. These are images to be savored in private).
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Photosets offered in 1000px, 2000px, 4000px, and original definition, for both streaming and download.
-The online streaming mechanism to view photosets is fast and easy to use.
-Videos offered in 720p, 1080p, 4K. Newer videos have a 6K option.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
My equipment goes to 1080p, so I cry at night at the people who have finer, more expensive equipment than I can afford.
-Navigation is easy.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are basically minor.
-They require separate login details for the Ultra Film site that is different from the login details you use to access the other 3 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn.
Technically, you are not a member of each of the 4 sites: you are only a member of one of the 4 sites, with access to the other 3 sites.
-Customer service can be slow to respond. I've asked some questions of customer service, and never got a reply to some questions. And other PU members have also complained about customer service problems. But that happens with many porn sites.
-The network used to have a forum where they would announce news of the network, and allow members to post comments and questions. They eliminated the forum years ago. A shame. I guess they didn't want to spend time maintaining the forum.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-This review is supposed to be on the Ultra Films site. But in my mind, I can't really distinguish between the 4 sites I've mentioned: all 4 sites are basically the same: the models are used at all 4 sites, the style of the shoots for videos and photosets is similar, the content is similar. They are marketed as 4 separates sites, but that is to increase revenue, not for artistic reasons.
Years ago, the owners/operators of the sites would sometimes post a video of a shoot in Wow Girls, and post the photoshoot of the same video in Wow Porn, and vice versa.
They didn't try to create sites with different styles of content or different themes: the idea of creating different sites was to generate more money.
Basically, Ultra Films, All Fine Girls, Wow Girls and Wow Porn are 4 sites with the same style of content, that use the same models, the same staff (phographers, videographers) to shoot the content.
If you're into hardcore teen porn, any one of these sites, or especially all 4 sites, are like teen heaven: you won't find more attractive models anywhere.
You should be able to find a low membership price of $70/year, which is offered throughout the year, for the last couple of years now.
What is the content:
Solo girls. Mainly masturbation. Some masturbation with toys.
Girl/girl sex. Multiple girls having sex with each other.
Boy/girl sex. 2 guys on one girl. A guy on 2 girls.
They mix it up. But the girls are almost uniformly attractive. And they seem to be enjoying themselves.
The sex is not over the top. Not extreme. Not rough. Just good clean fun.
These photosets and videos are a pleasure to watch. Much more interesting and erotic than what you can find at MetArt or Hegre (my personal opinion, I realize).
You look at a photoset of Amanda Dee, titled "Make Me Want You", posted 24 Mar 2022.
This is a solo girl photoset. The model is a slender white girl, around 20 years old, black or brown hair, cute, attractive, smiles a lot, small breasts, just a pleasure to look at. No toys in the photoset.
In some scenes, she can come across as the young girl next door.
Not as a porn star.
And her interview, posted Mar 07, 2022, is unusual, in that she talks extensively about her personal life: how she spends time dancing, cooking, what she's studying at university, how she spends time with her boyfriend, she just comes across as a simple, normal young girl, not a porn star, just a cute young girl trying to make a meaningful and happy life for herself and her boyfriend and her parents.
The model named Amanda Dee at the Wow sites is named Amanda Fine at Metart, MetartX, and Sexart.
I don't know why, but I find the Amanda photosets more erotic at Wow network than I do at the Metart network sites. I can't explain with details.
It's the same girl, more or less similar poses, but the colors are better at the Wow Girls site, there's more variety between each succeeding photo in the set, the overall effect is just stronger, better at the Wow Girls set versus any of the sets at the Metart network.
What I'm saying is: you look at the set at Wow Girls, and you respond to it.
You look at the set at Metart (or Metartx or Sexart), and there's less response in you.
The model is not as attractive. She's not as pleasing.
So even though Metart is famed as a one of the finest softcore sites on the internet, their photosets, even with lovely or beautiful models, can lack impact. Which can start to become boring.
And for different reasons, the Wow network photosets are more valuable: the can have greater impact, hold your interest better, than what you find at Hegre or the Metart sites.
Which doesn't make a lot of sense, until you yourself study the photosets at Metart and at the Wow network, and see which you prefer.
Bottom line: I think Ultra Films (with the other 3 sites) is a no-brainer join for $70/year.
If you're into hardcore teen porn.
And it's worth joining, if you're into softcore teen porn.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-I want to thank PU member Avory for pointing out a special discount that was being offered.
For $70, you got access to the 3 sites of the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), plus access to Ultra Films. That access includes unlimited streaming and downloading.
I was paying more than that for access to the 3 Wow network sites. And now, not only did I get a lower price, but I also got Ultra Films access thrown in for free.
-Site features videos with the following options: 720p, 1080p, 2160p (2160p is UHD).
Unlimited streaming, unlimited downloading for videos and photosets.
-The content is exclusive.
-There is a photoset for each video, with 60 to 75 photos per set. The photos are real photos, not screencaps, clear, crisp images, nicely focused, of these lovely young models.
The photosets are definitely worth collecting.
-You can view the photos online, in their photo player.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can download each photoset in your choice of 4 definitions: 1,000 px, 2,000 px, 4,000 px, and original, which is 4096 x 2160 px.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Updates once daily, or every other day.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are relatively minor. The Ultra Films site is a fine addition to the Wow network.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The password for Ultra Films site is computer generated, and it's different from the password for the Wow network sites.
-This is a technical issue. You have a membership in one site in the Wow network. But you have access to all 4 sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films). I don't know why the sites/network define the system that way, but that's the reply the support staff tells you if you ask why you don't have a membership in each separate site.
Bottom Line:
The current price is $90/year for access to all 4 sites in the network.
But you might find a discounted offer of $70/year if you search.
I signed up for the Wow Girls email list, and I got an email offer to join the 4 sites for $70 on 2021-03-16 (and have gotten that same offer every few months).
Note: I'm calling the 4 sites a network.
The company itself calls 3 of the sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) the Wow network, but has added free access to the Ultra Films site for the last 4 months.
All Fine Girls and Wow Girls and Wow Porn used to be part of the Diesel network. Then they dropped the name of the Diesel network, except that joining any one of the 3 sites gave you access to all 3 sites. I'm simplifying, because the mechanics of access changed over time.
At one time, if you joined All Fine Girls by itself, you would gain access to the other 2 sites if you remained a member of All Fine Girls for a certain period of time. Or, you could pay an upgrade fee and gain access to all 3 sites.
There were other ways to gain access to all 3 sites, but that is only historical interest.
The current situation is (for the last 4 months) is that if you join any one of the 4 sites, you gain access to all 4 sites.
And if you sign up for the Wow email newsletter, you might find the offer of $70/year in your email inbox, every so often.
The Ultra Films site features videos with most of the same models (late teens, early 20s white girls from Eastern Europe) that are seen at the Wow network.
The girls range from attractive to lovely. They are among the finest collection of hardcore teen models on the internet, and although the site and network are not glamcore, these fresh, young beauties are lovely to watch.
The sex action covers the basic themes of hardcore porn: solo masturbation, boy-girl, boy-2 girls, 2 boys 2 girls, girl-girl, 3 or more girls.
You get blow jobs, vaginal sex, anal sex, lesbian sex.
A smattering of toys, but the models prefer fingers and lips and tongues for solo and lesbian sex.
What sets the site and the network apart is how lovely these teen models are: attractive to lovely young teens that are exploring their bodies, either solo, or with other teen girls, or with one or more boys thrown in.
It's not glamcore or heartcore, because this is not romantic sex: it's just young girls who really enjoy getting off. And it's beautiful to watch. The videos and photos are clear, crisp images of these lovely teens who are putting on a show for you and seem to be really enjoying themselves.
Joie de vivre.
It's hardcore, but it's not smut. It's lovely teen girls who really seem to be enjoying themselves with sex.
And with some boys who are lucky enough to join in the fun.
-Ultra Films is a fine site. But the Wow network of 3 sites are even better sites, because the three sites have far more content, far more models.
But to get all 4 sites for less than I was paying for Ultra Films by itself, and far less than I used to pay for the Wow network, seems like a bargain to me.
The Wow network is one of the best teen hardcore networks on the internet.
The models range from attractive to lovely young teens.
The video quality is outstanding.
The photographic quality is outstanding. The photosets are not glamcore style, but the images are clear, crisp photos of these young teens that are definitely worth collecting.
The Wow network is definitely one of my favorite teen hardcore networks, and I've been a year-long member for several years.
I'm giving the Ultra Films site a score of 95.
The site is excellent.
You get 3 other excellent sites thrown in.
You get quality (the attractive young models, the fine quality of the videos and photos, the simplicity of the navigation.
This is an excellent site and network for teen hardcore porn.
For a price that is a bargain.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The models range from pretty to lovely. Mainly slim bodies, white, late teens to early twenties.
-The quality of the videos and photo sets is high class. Excellent lighting, focus, sound control.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Choice of definition for downloading and streaming, from 480p through 4K.
-You can steam or download the entire video, or select the parts you want to play or download.
-Most videos have an accompanying photo set, which can be downloaded in 1000px, 2000px, and 4000px.
-Navigation is basic but simple. You can search by Updates, Films, Galleries, Models.
Cons:
-I believe the cons are minor. This is one of the better sites for quality teen porn.
The reasons are shown in the pro section above: the lovely teen models, the technical quality of the videos and photo sets.
-Vendo is the billing agent. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem.
-The customer support can be poor. They require you to use a ticketing system, and you don't always get a response to your requests. That is the Ultra Film support system, which is called onetouchservice. The Vendo support is much better.
Bottom Line:
If you like the Wow Girls and Wow Porn or All Fine Girls sites, you should like the Ultra Films site as well.
They use the same models, the same style of porn, which could be called glamcore, in that the content is more or less spontaneous sex. The sex is either solo masturbation, girl-girl, boy-girl, or threesomes or more between girls, girls with a guy, girls with two guys.
Not a lot of romance or plot, just some kissing or fondling before they get down to the blowjobs and vaginal and anal intercourse or fingering and licking etc.
I believe the site was started around 2017-06, when Ultra 4K videos were becoming popular on porn sites. Which is why they called the site Ultra Films, because the site features videos with definitions up to 4K.
(Teen Mega World also started a site in 2015 called Beauty 4K which featured videos up to 4K definition. But for years, all the new videos at all the sites at Teen Mega World go up to 4K definition, so it's not the newest fad any more.)
Having said that 4K is no longer the newest fad, some PU members really seem to enjoy the 4K experience.
I don't have the equipment to enjoy or appreciate the 4K experience. Maybe it's my age (I'm over 70), or my eyesight, or the lack of high end equipment, but I can't tell or appreciate the increased value of videos that are above 720p.
And if I download content (video or photo sets), the lower definition content takes far less storage space than the higher definition content.
If I download a 4000px, 2000px and 1000px photo set of the same photo set, and watch the photos in a slide show with Windows Photo Viewer (a photo viewer software that comes with Windows 10 on some editions), I can't tell the difference visually between the different definition photos.
However, if I use IrfanView software (another photo viewer software that is free), and expand a single photo, I can tell the difference in the definition of a single photo.
But that is not the way I view these photos. I usually use a slide show player to view them.
Or, I can stop the slide show, to view a single photo, but I don't usually expand the photo the examine it in blow-up mode.
So, for me, downloading high definition videos and photos is mainly a waste of storage space.
And 4K videos use up a lot of storage space fast.
That's me.
There seem to be enough PU members that appreciate 4K content that it's a significant factor in their enjoyment of a porn site.
And the same for Virtual Reality sites. There are PU members who enjoy and subscribe to Virtual Reality porn sites.
I don't have virtual reality equipment. So virtual reality sites don't interest me very much.
Although the sites can also be viewed without virtual reality equipment.
But mainly virtual reality porn is best skipped over if you don't have virtual reality equipment.
Bottom line:
The Ultra Films site is a quality offering from the people who run the Wow Girls\Wow Porn sites.
You have the same lovely teen models, the same type of porn: spontaneous sex between young teens,
filmed in clear, crisp images with solid colors, and excellent technical factors.
How can they improve the site:
If you join any one of the three sites (Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls), you get immediate access to all 3 sites.
Ultra Films is a separate site.
If they added Ultra Films to the other 3 sites in a single membership, that would more content added for the same price.
That would be great for the porn customer.
But not so great for the porn producer, who is trying to increase revenues, by offering sites with different memberships.
The newest offering from these people is LustWeek.com.
Which uses the same models seen at the other sites (Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls, Ultra Films) I've mentioned, in the same high quality porn.
The LustWeek site focuses on a new model each week. And these models can be fucking lovely.
I'm giving the Ultra Films site a score of 93.
It's definitely worth checking out, if you are a fan of All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn.
However, joining all of these worthwhile sites can get to be very expensive.
When I joined Ultra Films, I believe the biller was Vendo.
Their customer support telephone number is supposed to be 24/7. 24 hours per day, 7 days a week.
Customer Support 18777773758
Call them, and see if they can solve your login problem.
You should find the confirmation email that you received on joining, with your login details and any other information they will need, to prove you are a member of the site.
I haven't contacted the Ultra Films support directly.
But when I used the same ticketing method for Wow Girls (run by the same company), they didn't bother to reply to my question.
I would recommend keeping it simple.
Tell Ultra Films you paid for a trial membership, and were never given access.
That you contacted customer service explaining the problem several times, but the problem was never fixed: no site access.
So you want a refund of your membership fee.
The site should give you the choice of a full refund, or a free trial period to the site.
That only seems fair.
I'm currently a member of Ultra Films, and have never had a problem with the site, so I've never contacted customer service.
But I know some sites (the Wow sites, and All Fine Girls) do have a ticket system for customer service, which seems cumbersome.
But these sites should stand behind their product, which is giving access to paying customers.
So I suggest standing firm, sending a customer ticket and saying you paid for a trial membership, and were not given access to the site, and you want a full refund.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. You get access to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-The network updates weekly. But this site gets one video update per month, which is very poor. Actually, the update rate is less than 1 update per month. They put videos from other sites in the network into this site, and I'm counting those out-of-site-videos as part of the update rate, since it's often difficult to tell from a video whether it really belongs to this site or should have been put into one of the other network sites. Or maybe a video is double-counted, and the same video is put into the Unlimited MILFs site and also put into a different site such as Family XXX.
-Videos for the last few years are offered in 360p through 4K definition.
-There is a photo set for each video. And it has a zip file. But the photo set is only offered in one definition for downloads. Except I don't like any of the models at this site, so I passed on downloading.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The videos at the site are exclusive to the network (exclusive to the network, but you can find a lot of the videos from this site at a different site in the network).
-As far as I can tell, there is unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading for the site and the network.
CONS(START OF):
-Navigation is poor. They don't put the posting date for each video in a convenient position.
-The links are slow to respond. You click on a hot link, and can wait a minute or more for the page to change to your destination.
-A lot of the models have breast implants that are large to huge. I'm not a fan of breast implants, especially oversized breasts.
-A lot of the models aren't very attractive.
-There is a lot of screaming and yelling to show fake excitement. Play these videos on low volume, or your neighbors will wonder what the fuck is going on.
Bottom Line:
Site features videos where the stepmom has sex with her stepson. There's very little lead-in to the sex, almost no plot, other than they establish that the older woman (in her 30s or older) is the stepmom and the stunt cock is her stepson. And then they suck and fuck and whatever. Which gets old fast, since the models aren't that attractive.
I much prefer other sites in the network, such as Family XXX or The Lesbian Experience, where there is more of a story, and the models are better looking, and usually younger. And there are less implants. And a lot of the models have tattoos, which I'm not a fan of.
Videos run around 30 to 35 minutes, which would be a good length, if there was some story to give meaning to the sex, which there isn't. And since I don't find the models attractive, the site is basically a waste of space for me.
But watch a few videos, and maybe you might enjoy these videos. Maybe yes, or maybe no.
I realize I'm being very critical.
The reason is, I do enjoy watching some of the videos at some other sites: either I enjoy the stories, or the more attractive models, or the visual sex, or a combination of those factors. So, why should I watch the videos at this site, which feature models that I don't find attractive, and almost-no-plot stories, and sex that is basically boring?
So the site is a waste of my time.
And the navigation is poor: Not only are the hot links slow to load content, but moving around the site to explore what it has to offer is slow and cumbersome. And the search is poor: you enter a model's name, and it will give you a bunch of names in return. And if you do get to the model's page, it probably won't list all of her content at the site or network.
They need to get a software engineer to re-vitalize the site and network, and make it easier to use.
You can often join this site during holiday specials, for $60 a year. But the question is: why would you want to join for a year?
Most PU members would only join for a month, and download whatever they want from the network.
And then rejoin a year or two later, to see if there is any new content they might find interesting.
I really like your cons. Think they're important, at least for me:
-Slow update rate.
-Poor search capability.
-Too many breast-implant models.
-Porn-valley look (great phrase to describe models' looks).
That has the contact information for Rocketgate.
Their phone number. Which is active, and gives you a choice of contacting billing
Also, there's a link to customer service to cancel a membership.
Rocketgate is a reputable payment processor.
I've had one account with them for a Metart site for years.
I never contacted customer service, because I never had any problems with the membership.
But it should be fairly easy to cancel a sub.
Let us know if you have any problems.
If you do have problems, reach out to the PU staff, for assistance.
In the past (prior owners), they were more than willing to help PU members who had a problem with billing or membership issues.
When I say it should be easy, I don't mean it's easy. Rocketgate is not as easy to cancel a membership as CCBill or Epoch, which are easier to use.
But keep trying. It's frustrating to be billed for a service you don't want. I've been stung in the past by sites that didn't deliver the service they promised.
If she's back from holiday (it should be any day now), she should be able to help with your cancellation.
And if the membership was renewed, she should be able to get you a refund.
The rocketgate site is not as easy to cancel a membership as CCBill, Epoch, or Vendo.
But send her an email, you can copy what you posted in this comment, to her.
She should help fix the problem.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good update rate: they add a new photoset or video every day or every other day.
-Video and photoset quality is outstanding.
-The selection of models is very good. I would rate the Metart, MetartX, Love Hairy (all part of the Metart network) as more attractive, but I doubt any PU member would kick any of these girls out of his or her bed.
-In the last few years, the site has focused on two girls getting it on,
or solo masturbation. The girls (late teens, twenties) are attractive, but I would rate Love Hairy and MetartX models slightly above the VivThomas models. Let me explain: how a model is photographed can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears. Also, you have more control over a model's appearance in a photograph than in a video, more control over the lighting, use of cosmetics, photoshopping, etc. And in my opinion, even if the same model appears at all 3 sites, her appearance at Love Hairy and MetartX is usually better than her appearance at Viv Thomas.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
They say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder: but the photographer can make a huge difference in a model's appearance: with lighting, setting, cosmetics, photoshopping, etc.
One of the finest sites for making a model appear glamourous is The White Boxxx, which makes an art of making attractive models appear like movie stars, even when they are doing hardcore sex.
-Content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
CONS(START OF):
-Viv Thomas is an excellent site. The cons are minor.
Navigation is easy. The content (films and galleries) have extensive tags that make finding the content that appeals to your tastes easy. The model index is good: oversized headshots of the models. But even though these are attractive to beautiful women, the headshots often don't emphasize their beauty. The staff, or whoever is responsible to making these headshots, need to re-photograph the model's headshots to show how lovely they can be.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
They need to sell the beauty of the models. Appearance or presentation is vitally important in a glamour site.
-Viv Thomas is a stand-alone site. It's part of the Metart network, but membership in Viv Thomas does not give you access to any other site in the Metart network.
-You do get access to the Metart live cam shows, but that that's standard with any Metart network site. And they really push the live cam shows, with ads on every member page.
-Like many or most Metart network sites, you can buy individual photosets and videos, even if you're not a member. But the prices are not cheap. A better way to download the photosets and videos is to join for a month: much cheaper, especially if you want to download more than a few sets.
-They advertise daily updates. But the update rate is really every 1 or 2 days.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Number of films: 2,123
Number of galleries: 3,322
Number of models: 1,095
Number of contributing photographers: 36
Most of the models are attractive, and many are familiar from other sites in the Metart network.
-Viv Thomas was started by Viv Thomas around 2000, so it been around over 20 years now.
The Metart people took over the site in 2014. Domai, which started around 1997, used a simpler style of female solo nudity. And then Goddess Nudes was started by the same founder of DOMAI a few years later, to create a slightly edgier site. DOMAI and Goddess Nudes were added to the Metart network when the founder's age made running the sites increasingly difficult.
All 3 sites were famous for the quality of the content. Although the Viv Thomas site was much more sexual, with solo, lesbian, and boy-girl content. DOMAI and Goddess Nudes were mainly simple solo female model sets.
Once Metart took over the sites, they slowly changed the site structures into the Metart network style, to make navigation easier and to add the frills that the Metart network sites are known for.
Photosets are available for streaming and downloading in 3 definitions.
You can control how the photosets are displayed on your monitor: resolution, number of thumbnails displayed per page, slideshow interval time, whether comments are displayed or hidden, sort order for films and galleries, etc.
You also get the standard blog for the Metart network, tailored to the Viv Thomas site.
Large, well-photographed photos of one or two lovely models, with a link to a short erotic fiction based on the gallery or film displayed.
Viv Thomas is basically a fine site: easy to use, good customer support (but telephone and live chat service would be faster than email support), good erotic content for solo masturbation and two-girl lesbian sex.
I'm giving the site a score of 91. It's an excellent site, and PU has a discounted membership price of $20/month. Or $100/year, if you're into lesbian sex.
The link I got opens a page (the URL above) that seems to offer your choice of joining all 6 sites, or any sites of your choosing, for a discounted price.
Hope this helps, if you want to join.
I've got too many subs already, to want to join these choices.
I remember visiting the Netherlands and Denmark in the early 1990s.
As a tourist, we were charged higher prices than what our tour guides were paying, for the items. I thought it was a rip-off, but we were on a tour, and that's the way it worked.
Unfair, but when we were in a group at some stops, that's what happened.
But I've read in the past, that PU members in Europe often have to pay higher prices, because of regional pricing. Which could be because of the credit card company, or the pay site processor, or some other reason.
But if there is some legal way to get around it, it would be helpful to know, for our European members. To get better prices.
The prices you quote seem very high to me.
They are far higher than what a person in the United States (USA) pays.
Are those the prices you see when you use the PU link to go to the join page at the Vixen site?
If so, can you use a VPN to change the location your computer shows?
Year-long memberships to a VPN can be very cheap.
And with a VPN, you can choose a location in the US, as the computer link location.
And I would assume you would see much lower membership prices.
I would assume, but not really sure, that your credit card company (if that's how you fund your membership) would charge a small premium for converting your payment to US dollars, but it should still be far less than the prices you are quoting in your review.
I'm not a lawyer, so I assume what I'm suggesting is legal.
But you seem to be paying far too much for this membership.
Are there special taxes you pay, in addition to conversion rates, for a membership to pay site, and that's why your fees are so high?
The normal PU discount is:
Monthly: $24.95 the first month (recurring recurs at $29.95/mo.)
Year: $99.95 (recurring)
And there are often holiday specials, when the price can drop to around $10 or $15 for the first month,
I suggest checking out what a good, cheap VPN would cost for a year or multi-year membership.
Most of them give a free trial of a few weeks or more.
VPN means your computer is safer from hacking.
But some services don't allow you to be connected to a VPN while you use them.
For example, Netflix will not allow you to use a VPN to connect to their service.
Just a suggestion.
But the prices you are paying for Vixen (and maybe other porn sites) seem very high. Much higher than what US customers pay.
Thanks so much for the generous advice.
Oculus VR devices seem to be in high demand, maybe because of the coronavirus.
Best Buy and Walmart (local stores) are out of the different versions of these devices.
And Amazon is charging a premium of maybe $80 to a few hundred dollars or more for used versions of these devices.
I guess this is price-gouging at its finest.
I live in Los Angeles County, California, but there don't appear to be any sites where I can try these devices. Again, maybe it's the coronavirus that is part of the problem, but there are no local stores or sites that have these devices within a 70 miles or more, as far as I can tell.
I'll probably go for the Oculus Go, but I really wish I could try it out first.
But if I can get it for $150 or so, for the 32GB version, it seems like a nice entry-way into the VR experience.
Trying for the more expensive Oculus Rift S seem chancy, because my PC is not a gaming PC, and the device probably wouldn't work well (if at all) with the desktop PC I have. Which is a low-end, non-gaming PC.
I'm not into games anyway. I don't think I've ever played a computer game (what are called computer games today). Never bought a computer game. Though I've seen hundreds of ads for them.
But thanks again for the advice.
Note: at Best Buy (an electronics chain in my area), it says the Oculus Go is not available within 250 miles of my location.
There are cases for the Oculus Go that are available in my local area at Best Buy, but it doesn't make sense to buy a case to hold something I don't have yet, anyway.
LOL.
I'm not into VR yet, lack of funds, but oldfizzywig gives it a high recommendation and some other PU members also seem to be into it heavily, as a great advancement in porn.
So if I get some extra money, and gain some courage and the needed equipment, I will give it a try.
I'm sorry you paid such a high price for a disappointing VR site, but warnings like yours can be very useful to the rest of us, even if we aren't into VR yet.
There are a few other PU members who comment on VR sites, but most of them don't comment or review very often.
For whatever reason.
I think PU member participation at the site has dropped considerably, from the days of Khan. A shame. But it's still a useful site for valuing porn sites.
And the raffle is a nice feature, even if it's only once a month.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
