Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Alybator (0)  

Feedback:   All (248)  |   Reviews (225)  |   Comments (1)  |   Replies (22)

Other:   Replies Received (68)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 260 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
51
Visit ChickPass Network

ChickPass Network
(0)

94.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Updates once or twice a day

Both 4K and High Definition downloads are offered

The site says the scenes are exclusive and I think most of the models are as well.

I did not find any download limits

Pornusers offers a discounted price
Cons: Older scenes are not High Definition

The site needs more Indian American models. Just joking as they have one and I am not sure there is another they could find to add.
Bottom Line: There is a lot I like about this site as it is so very different from most porn sites I have been a member of. Yes it has sex, but that is not all you get for your membership. You get a site that kind of breaks the mold. What I mean is that the videos mostly star only one male model, Logan, who also owns the site and is the contact for customer service. It has an old fashioned, hands on feel to it, except that porn like this is not as common as I would like.

He is an older gentleman who calls himself a geek. Balding and with a paunch, he is polite and even deferential towards the amateur models. He talks to them and asks them questions. He seems incredulous that they would have sex with him. I like that in a man, one who appreciates his woman. He looks like someone I would find attractive in real life. Most men in porn expect that women should be grateful for an opportunity to be with them. How self entitled and a turn off is that? Give me a polite gentleman and I sit up and take notice. At the end of many scenes he thanks the model and asks if she would like to come back.

Part of the reason I say this is that I am from India, where being modest and not being full of yourself is considered very important. Besides that, older men are highly respected as we see them as power figures, much more so than do women in the United States. In India it is very common for older men to marry much younger women.

The sex is not your same old same old porn sex either. There are no extreme acts and the sex is done the way us non pornstars find pleasure. For example he often cums in the woman’s mouth and she closes her mouth around it with the cum inside. You don’t always get to see the cum or the cumshot, but you can tell by the realistic body language and moans that the orgasm is real. Porn sex is in some ways not real life sex and this site benefits from that touch of realism.

The models are completely unassuming as well. They enjoy the sex and quite sincerely seem to like him. They are not barely legal and they are not innocent either. They come across as self confident and happy to be in the scene. They are very much women you night meet in real life at a party, a bar or even a get together with your neighbors.

Another thing I appreciate about the models is that there is no set pattern or look that they share. Some are short, some tall, some thin, some white, some black, some Asian and some are Latina. Being from India I was delighted to see that rare type of model, a woman who is Indian American. There is a large Indian American community in New Jersey and Naomi Shah is from there. In India most women don’t shave, but in this country we nearly all do. Her body is very lean, clean shaved, she has a pretty face and has a few tattoos. Many Indian women have them. You see a stripper who has a very positive attitude towards nudity and also regarding sex. She has only twelve scenes, including an interview. Most are blow jobs or masturbation and there is also some vaginal. My only complaint is that she does not have more scenes. I am not sure who enjoyed her scenes more, her or the male model Logan. She seems to really like his penis and looks comfortable being naturally sexy.

The site uses a layout that I have not seen before. It was not hard to figure out and everything you need is there. It uses tags for an easy search and some of the scenes are available in both 4K as well as High Definition. The site has been adding one or two updates a day and has a very large archive of more than 6200 videos going back to 2008. Obviously some older scenes have lower quality.

10-28-21  07:56pm

Replies (0)
Review
52
Visit Class 3Some

Class 3Some
(0)

81.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Comes with three other sites in the Sensual Girl Network

Exceptionally beautiful and glamorously presented models

Every video is High Definition 720p

Absolutely one of the best glamour sex websites I have ever been a member of

There are 80 very erotic scenes

There is no mention of a download limit and I did not have a problem with one

Nice cumshots, but ordinary sized penises
Cons: There is no mention of the dates when the videos were posted

Not updating. The TBP review in 2013 showed more updates than there are now with 88
Bottom Line: This site promises real swallows and kisses, the fantasy you deserve. This made me expect some site that thinks they know what kind of porn women like. The women are presented as glamorous, made up nicely to look their best. This is what I have seen others call glamcore, maybe even couples porn. I think that the site works well if that is what you are looking for. Everything about this site shouts hot sex that is not extreme, not for those who are looking for a site that has a hard edge.

The models don’t talk, a sign that they might be Eastern European. As such, a great number of them are blondes, mostly genuine ones that are not from the pharmacy. There are a few moans or grunts, but that is not common. What you do get in the background is some distracting elevator music that made me turn the sound off. Although I would not be comfortable doing this, if I were sharing a man with a friend, I know there would be some verbal interaction between us. I am not talking about anything profound, but us girls can be verbal. Even during sex, we react and share our thoughts.

My best guess is that these young ladies are pros, not amateurs, and are from 18 to maybe 22 or slightly older. The guys are a little older, say 35 to 45. They don’t take advantage of the age difference in the scenes, but I can’t imagine why not. For the most part, the scenes just happen spontaneously as a result of playful interactions. In one scene with a black man, he is watering the shrubbery. Two young women in bikinis tease him and he squirts them with the hose. Soon the bikinis come off and they are all laughing and the real hosing begins. Something missing is that I did not see any model’s names. Mostly the women are very slim, but range from petite to tall. The guys had pretty much average for porn sized cocks and the cumshots were mostly, maybe even all, external and fun to watch. I even saw a few black male models, a rarity in Eastern European porn.

Besides the attractiveness of the models, I also congratulate the site for making the sets so attractive. Many of the scenes are outdoors, using boats, beaches, pools and house decks to give a feeling of classy elegance. The feeling I had was one of a scene that was so beyond the ordinary that it helped to increase the fantasy. Most other porn sites just put two or more models in a room.

The sex itself is mostly oral done on the men, but you can also find vaginal and anal. Rimming is not uncommon and mostly done with the other woman also going down on him. Sometimes one woman has sex with the man while the other helps, as what they call on the site an assistant. Sometimes it is both women oral on the lucky guy. Sometimes he takes turns with sex with each one. I like that the models seemed to be having some fun and there were times I felt that there was some genuine chemistry going on. The best video quality is HD 720p, but very sharp except for a few older scenes.

I think the site is no longer updating as the TBP review in 2013 has 88 scenes listed and today there are 80. The scenes are undated. If I paid for just this site alone, I would feel that the quality of the scenes were worth the price to join. However, you also get three other high quality sites in the Sensual Girl Network.

02-05-22  11:07am

Replies (0)
Review
53
Visit Class Blowjob

Class Blowjob
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Comes with three other sites in the Sensual Girl Network

Very beautiful and glamorous models showcased very well

Every video is at least High Definition

One of the best blow job sites I have ever been a member of

Twenty six of the 137 videos have two or more models
Cons: There is no mention of the dates that new videos are being posted

Only six updates are Full High Definition and none are in 4K
Bottom Line: They should have called this site First Class Blow Jobs as that is exactly what you get here. Everything about the videos is close to perfect for me and I believe most women would agree. Wow.

The models are a mix of professionals that I have seen on other sites, to first timers and pretty much all of them look great. The ones I have seen before on other sites look better here and I credit the way the site showcases their looks. All of them are white and I am pretty sure from Eastern Europe. They don’t talk and I know enough about porn to know that is a clue as to where they are from. There is not much of a mix of ages or body types, but the models here are among the best of the best in porn of the last few years. The guys look a few years older, but the small age difference is not played up. They are mostly fairly good looking and these women get them really hard. The focus is not on the guys very much, as they are just there so the women can take advantage of them. In some cases you don’t see much of the big head, but the little head is what I joined for anyway. The guys don’t seem to mind being an object of pure lust, but in contrast the women get very enthusiastic about doing the deed.

I liked that in nearly every scene there is ball play and a lot of attention is focused on them. I have found many guys in real life are a bit, let’s say squeamish about being touched down there, let alone being licked. Here I would say there is a lot of worship of the family jewels. Additionally, although I did not mind it, there was also a lot of rimming going on too. Not my favorite sex act, so consider yourself advised that it does happen. At least I can say that it is done rather enthusiastically, so it is good to see models having fun together.

The cumshots are big enough, no complaints there. In nearly all cases you get to see them in all their glory with the screen filled with nice visuals. There is some cum swallowing too and it seems very satisfying as a conclusion to what happens after such enthusiasm.

I liked the scenes that had two young ladies in them. Twenty six videos were not enough for me, I want more like that. They took turns, shared licking together, cum and in general were terrific fantasies that I think many women would like to watch. Speaking of fantasy, the camerawork and the style of presentation create a fantasy for the mind as well as the eye.

As much as I liked the content, I think the website itself is in need of a makeover. I did not see any scene descriptions of more than a few words, such as sweet swallow or dong lifter. Those sound like interesting tee shirt slogans. I recognized some of the models, but the site does not credit who is in the scene. As some are advertised as first timers, I assume they mean on camera, I would like to follow their careers after the ones they did so well here. I can’t help but wonder if any of these first timers went on to be big names in the industry.

The archive is fairly good sized with 137 videos of at least HD quality, as well as photo updates. I thought the photos were not much, but I admit I don’t care about photos anyway. Besides all this, it is part of a four site network called Sensual Girl. The other sites are Oldje, Class Nudes, Class Threesome, which has two women paired with one guy as an unusual focus. The main site is Oldje, which is one of the best, maybe even the best, to focus on older men with much younger women.

02-05-22  11:04am

Replies (0)
Review
54
Visit Class Lesbians

Class Lesbians
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Many beautiful Eastern European barely legal and twenty something young ladies

All the videos are available in 4K

I felt these were very natural and real orgasms.

Has good sensuality between the models

Easy navigation
Cons: Only 37 videos. May not be updating as TBP shows 34 last February, one year ago.

Does not come with any other sites or extras.

Background music
Bottom Line: I love seeing orgasms in videos, whether it is a heterosexual couple, a gay couple, a lesbian couple or a threesome with any combination including bisexual and transgender. I am very heterosexual, but I have to admit to a curiosity about women. I think most women are curious, but not all of us admit that. I have a friend that I have not experimented with, who is seriously into lesbian sex. She told me that you do what you do when you masturbate, but you do it to and with someone else. I have also heard that another woman can push your buttons in a different way than men are capable of. The dynamic is completely different. I also realize that I can’t speak from experience.

One thing I can recognize is if an orgasm is real or if a model is only going through the motions and faking it. When I see a woman tense up, lose focus, shake, even lose control, I know what I am witnessing. That to me is how I know it is the real thing. I can easily identify with the model and that makes me get off.

These women are Europeans, not Americans and to me they look very exotic. Mostly they are very fair in complexion and have either light brown hair, or blondes or redheads. In India we don’t have that kind of variety. Besides the fantasy of being with another woman, now there is also the fantasy of her being a stark contrast with most people from my native country. Another contrast is how young and eager these women are. I see attractive women in their early to late twenties who are still exploring their sexuality.

The scenes seem to be mostly spontaneous and not overly directed. The setup is there, but what happens looks to be whatever the women get in the mood for. In one scene, two women are in a secluded park. They do what comes naturally as they feel they are alone and not being watched or judged. In another, a female friend goes to visit a woman in the hospital. She is so happy to see her friend that they end up doing the deed. Ok it does not look like a hospital and it is all too convenient that no one stumbles into the room. You just have to go along with it as this is a porn fantasy, not Hollywood. But the sex works well and that is pretty much what I came for.

The sex is not abusive or femdom and it is not only soft pussy licking either. Basically you get just about everything that women can do together. You get pussy licking with a lot of clit sucking, but also ass licking. You get gentle fingering of both pussy and ass. You get massages using oil and there is always a happy ending. You get dildos, vibrators and Hitachi wands. You get some strap on use, but it is not as aggressive or abusive as some sites. You get scissoring that seems to work for the models as a last step towards an orgasm.

The site is easy to use and you can search, but there are no tags. The site does not include any other extras. The women are beautiful. The sets are fantastic. The camerawork is first rate. What more can I ask for? Well there are only 37 scenes and I fear the site is no longer updating. I like what I saw here, but I think this site belongs in a network as an extra.

02-05-22  11:10am

Replies (0)
Review
55
Visit Club Sweethearts

Club Sweethearts
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Everything about it is innocent except the producer and cameraman!

Incredibly large site with 7,197 videos and 10,309 picture sets

There are 4,056 models forever stuck at 18

Good sorting and searching features including by series, niche and date

Video quality goes up to 4K and downloads are unlimited.

There are too many “cute” niches on here for a straight woman. I have avoided this type of porn for a reason! I have been a member on this network for several months and just looked at this site for the first time last week.
Cons: If you’re a straight woman you may not feel like one after a membership here.

Maybe it could be too cute to some.

I don’t know if it’s fair to list overwhelming as a con.
Bottom Line: I won’t explain my last pro anymore than is needed. I usually avoid this cute, teen, being innocently kinky porn. I never experienced anything like this, at that age, in India. It makes it something that intrigues me now and I’m old enough to be most of these models’ mom. Maybe some of you guys can explain how you deal with that? Does the “eww, I’m being creepy” feeling go away?

The scenes are not as innocent as I expected. A lot of them are. The newest update might explain my concern and problem with this type of porn. The model, Rita Fox, looks to have some baby fat on her and is bent over, grabbing her ankles, while wearing a bikini. I looked away several times. The innocence of the scenes is lost just 4-5 scenes later when you see one of these innocent teens sucking a BBC like a pro. I still feel creepy.

The videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. The older ones do decline as expected. The scenes cover a lot of different niches. I am admitting ignorance, I thought this type of site only had teasing and scenes to make me feel like a pervert. I still do, but these innocent models are no more innocent than the producer and cameraman.

The picture sets add a lot. I have started looking at more pictures the last few months. I am starting to wonder if video killed the pornography star. If you know the song, it somehow made its way to India and was played 50 times a day. I am impressed by the variety. There is hardcore, softcore, lesbian, group, and the slumber parties. That creepy feeling is looking around the corner at me.

I couldn’t believe the number of scenes at over 7,000 and over 10,000 picture sets. I just wish there was a way to make my own filter that would be titled, “Scenes that are like this one”. That is maybe the biggest con for me. This is overwhelming. I have found several scenes I really like, but there are thousands to go through to find more like it. Where is the “scenes like this one” when you need it? The solo scenes are even good and I usually don’t like solo female. I really think it has something to do with the site creating a taboo feeling in me. There are outdoor scenes too. Not for sure if that qualifies as exhibitionism. The group scenes are my current favorites. I didn’t know models this age performed in group scenes or even knew group sex was a thing. I need to get away from that BDSM content, the real fetishes are on sites like this. I can tie myself up. I can’t create a five 19 year old teens slumber party. I guess I could.

This site is maybe getting me with the newness (to me) of it. I could take a vacation for a few weeks and not even get 1/10th of the way of through this site. If my feelings on it drop off after the newness wears off, I will adjust the score, but right now I’m thinking the score is very fair for all this content and quality of it.

12-08-21  08:45am

Replies (1)
Reply
56
Visit Cody Cummings

Cody Cummings
(0)
Reply of UMBA8's Reply

The Cody Cummings site was the only one in the network that had the bisexual and hetero. The others had some solo guys, but not any with women. I have reviewed a few bisexual sites that were good, but small in size. There are several bisexual sites that aren't listed here that I liked a lot. I could reply with their names if you're interested.

06-17-20  04:49am

Review
57
Visit Cody Cummings

Cody Cummings
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Very handsome, bisexual male who does solo, bisexual, heterosexual and gay scenes.

A total of 314 scenes with 79 being solo, the rest are a blend of hetero, bisexual and gay.

Most scenes are HD (720p or 1080p with smaller resolutions available).

Very pretty girls in the scenes that feature women. It’s rare to see bisexual threesomes with two males and a pretty woman, but the ones here are.

Photo sets can be downloaded.

The tags can be made to just apply to the content on this site so it doesn’t bring up other sites on the network.
Cons: Seems to be a recurring theme, no longer updating.

The oldest scenes only have 480p download option.

Not much story in the scenes, especially the bisexual ones, it seems like those would be perfect for a story.
Bottom Line: Cody Cummings is one of the few male porn stars I know by name and have always found him attractive, but I don’t know if he has retired and I’ve just been watching too many tube sites or if he has moved on to other sites. I wouldn’t know if this is true, but this is the biggest solo site I have seen of a male gay/bisexual porn star. Cody is in every scene.

I still think sites like this one help blur the line between what appeals to gay men and straight women. There are scenes with Cody and a woman. Scenes with Cody, another man and a woman. Cody with just a man or men and Cody by himself. Every site I have found that at least is trying to blur that line has stopped updating.

Cody is a muscular, very fit guy that looks like he probably had a past in sports of some kind. One part that impresses me about his scenes is he seems to really be into all of them. Even the solo ones, which could be seen as a bad thing by some since he does seem to really embrace his own attractiveness.

There are over 300 scenes, as helpful as their categories are, they don’t have one for “bisexual”. I’m going to estimate there’s maybe 30 bisexual scenes, maybe 10 hetero and around 80 solo, the rest are gay scenes, but are not always the typical gay scene. There are ones where Cody and another guy or guy masturbate together. These too are appealing to me.

The video quality on this site is good with around 250 of the scenes having at least 720p or 1080p download choices. As a whole this network – Next Door Studios – in my opinion, is as good as it gets for straight females looking for sites with males masturbating and I think Cody’s site is the best of the sites on the network.

05-18-20  10:27pm

Replies (3)
Review
58
Visit College Amateurs

College Amateurs
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The most recent videos are in very sharp 4K

Logan is the male talent in many of the videos and he is very likeable

Most of the scenes are exclusive to the network

Most if not all, of the women are fresh, even first time amateurs

There are no download limits

New updates are added just about every day.
Cons: The oldest videos are standard definition. The site started in 2008.

There is some ethnic variety, but I would like even more.
Bottom Line: I don’t know for sure if all these young ladies are actually in college, but they look like they are in the right age range. They seem to be starting at barely legal and 18 to mature sexy women aged to about 24. Looking back on my life in college, I thought I was incredibly sexy and so did those college boys. This is the age when most of us explore all kinds of things and of course sex is among those. What else are those raging hormones for?

On Chickpass they can act out a few of those desires and not only with college age boys. Some of these scenes have them with older men as a contrast. These women have the energy the older guys have, but not really the experience. In many cases they seem to have that natural quality of a new, or fairly new exploration. Some of those scenes pair them with Logan, the website owner and he really is a rarity in porn. He is polite, respectful and cares that his partners enjoy his scenes with them. Logan is on the receiving end of a lot of blow jobs, but there is some other sex as well. Blow jobs seem to be a sex act that is not that difficult for a young lady new to porn. They control the action as the lucky guy is fairly passive. Further, other sex is more physically demanding. I don’t think many first timers or even those who have done a few scenes would do anal with a stranger. At that age it is very possible they have never done that in their personal lives either.

Other sex you see on the site includes masturbation and lesbian. In both of those a large number of beginners would feel comfortable doing that on camera. Many scenes involve toys and wands and in some cases there are even some vaginal and/or anal insertions.

The women come in all body types, but most are very thin. At that age Mother Nature has not changed our bodies much. This makes for a lot of similarities in the women, but many of us like that look. It signals to our brain that these women are fresh and eager.

One theme you see here is her in a cheerleader outfit. They are full of energy and enthusiasm, wearing a micro skirt, with nice legs and performing for a crowd. You see no cellulite or drooping, and they seem perfect to us women who are older.

The site is updating at about once a day on average. The most recent are available in 4K and many are at least High Definition. The oldest videos started before High Definition became available, but many of the videos are remastered to improve them.

I think porn like this is perfect for women new to watching porn and they can also feel comfortable watching these scenes with their guy. Both the men and women are easy on the eye and the sex feels real enough to enjoy. Who knows, maybe one thing may lead to another that night.

There is a good discount through Pornusers and you also get the rest of the Chickpass Network. There are 88 sites and a lot of the content is of young ladies in this age range.

10-28-21  07:53pm

Replies (1)
Review
59
Visit Couples Fantasies

Couples Fantasies
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A near perfect site for me. Couples living out their fantasies with each other.

Touches on nerves and hormones that most porn doesn't ever get close to.

Four downloadable video options, 480p, 720p, 1080p, 1920p.

I would have paid $15 for the 11 scenes on this site and been very happy about it. Instead, you get this site and 19 more.

Very attractive male and female actors.

I have watched each scene multiple times and probably will keep doing so. A site with this type of content being produced regularly would get me to join it on a lifetime membership.
Cons: Only 11 scenes. I know that's bad and maybe it will make my score look bad, but I have watched these 11 scenes more than the 500 I have on my hard drive.

Doesn't look like they will be updating it anymore, last update was in 2017.

The actors inability to speak English removes most of the bad acting and causes their actions to speak for them.
Bottom Line: The premise of these scenes is simple. There's a male/female couple and one of them has a fantasy or they both have the fantasy. Since there are only 11 scenes and I know there are people that want porn like this, I'm going to go over a few of them.

My Wife Wants to Squirt
The husband and wife invite in a third woman to teach the wife how to squirt. She starts with fingering the wife with the fully clothed husband watching. As the wife starts having orgasm(s), the husband walks over and pulls his dick out and starts jacking-off. The wife squirts, he cums and some of his cum even hits the woman assisting his wife.

Furtive Fingering By A Stranger
It's the fantasy us women like to say is not real. The shop owner Tiffany Doll is awaiting a package. I believe they are speaking Spanish or Portuguese. There was a man in the shop. Because I don't understand the language, I don't know if he was her husband or boyfriend. After he leaves, the delivery man brings a package and she's clearly attracted to him. They kiss deeply, he pushes her up on a counter, reminding yourself this is supposed to be a business anyone could walk in and he fingers her very hard, she even opens her shirt and bra. This is what makes these scenes different. She never touched his dick. There's no actual sex other than the fingering. It gives the realistic feel to the fantasy. He walks out of the shop like nothing happened.

One more is Turn Her On.
Male/female couple are attracted to a younger woman and they see her masturbating. The husband tells his wife to seduce her. They end up in a wild threesome.

This is the type of content I was first introduced to porn with. Vivid used to have this type of content and still do in the archives. It's the type of content that makes you wonder what you would do, it has a natural -- in the heat of the moment, feel to it.

The rest of the score comes from it being on a very good network with 19 other sites besides it. They seem to explore several areas of fantasies on their sites. I would compare the content to Pretty Dirty and Pure Taboo, it's porn that does more than just physically arouse you.

I will add a lot of the stepfamily type porn also touches on similar nerves and hormones, but I find these more believable since they are saying "this is a committed couple and in the heat of the moment they agreed to do something committed couples usually don't." Maybe one day someone will make more content like this. Until then, I'll hope I don't wear my 11 videos out!

02-17-20  11:02pm

Replies (1)
Review
60
Visit Creampie Angels

Creampie Angels
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: One of the more impressive sites on this network.

Probably their best collection of models on any of their sites.

Currently 225 scenes with a new scene being added each month.

Believable, maybe even passionate sex.

Decent variety in settings including some outdoors.

The only ads are at the bottom of the screen in the members area. The site has a clean, neat, interface to it and works well.
Cons: Being from India, I’m not really into creampie porn. It would take ages to explain.

Even though this looks to be one of the network’s top sites the video quality didn’t go above 720p until 2014-15.
Bottom Line: I would have scored this site 5 points higher if it wasn’t a creampie site. I’m just not into creampies, but do like cumshots so I think a 5 point deduction is fair since they are replacing one of my favorite parts with a part I don’t like.

The models on this site are as pretty, sexy and into the sex as any on this network. And it’s consistently the case. I do wonder if anyone has questioned if they have any fake cum in the creampie parts as some of them do not look real. It looks like someone took a can of whipped cream and squirted it in the woman. I can’t say I have experienced fluffy cum.

The scenes total 225, there is a video and photo set with each. Both are downloadable and it’s unlimited downloading. The streaming player works well too if you like to stream scenes before downloading them. There still isn’t much story to any of these scenes. You’re getting mostly sex with the guy cumming inside the woman. There is a good amount of emotions from the actors and that helps my view of it and Eastern European porn too.

The variety here is mostly from the setting. They have a few outdoor scenes. There are some in the bathtub/shower and they break away from the same bed setting a lot of their sites seem to be stuck on using. The models also show some diversity, not really ethnically, but they do have some very fair complexion redheads, a lot of brunettes and some blondes. The guys in these scenes are a little more attractive than their “teen” guys. I would like to see bigger, more muscular guys in these types of scenes since I see creampie as a power/control niche of sex and porn. I wouldn’t say it’s my favorite site on the network, but I could see people saying it’s the best site on the network.

I don’t really understand the video quality difference on this site. Their highest quality download up until 2015 was 720p, they added 1080p in 2015 until 2016, in 2016 they added 4K. That is not a major problem for me, but thought it should be mentioned since it seems like they would have 1080p before 2015, otherwise, it's a good site.

09-28-20  10:05pm

Replies (0)
Review
61
Visit Cuckold Sessions

Cuckold Sessions
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Cuckolding with a little variety.

Averaging just a little more than 1 update per month.
277 scenes with video and photo downloads.

Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.

265 female models on this site.

Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.

Uses Epoch as the biller.

At least some story and changes from scene to scene.
Cons: Older scenes video downloads are misleading, listed as Big HD, but are only 480p

4K versions of the videos cost $4 per scene

I would rate the believability of these “cuckold” scenes at 1-3 on a 10 scale.
Bottom Line: I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.

Being from India -- Cuckolding seems to be a much more common reality than in the United States. The basics of cuckolding is the wife or girlfriend is so sexually dominant and in control of her man, she demands he lets her have sex with other men while he watches. It also -- much smaller percentage -- can be about the husband or boyfriend having a fetish for watching his wife or girlfriend be with other men.

That’s why the believability factor is not very high on these scenes. It also gives the scenes one of their pros too. The cuckold is in various roles from scene to scene. Some of the cuckolds work the video camera, some just watch with enthusiasm and others are tied up in some form of bondage and made to watch. Most of the cuckolds look like either other porn actors or producers. Maybe even the regular cameraman becomes the “cuckold”? I still am giving them points for at least giving us scenes that vary.

An interesting part about this niche is reading the comments left by members. I believe those comments hurt the scenes since it’s clear many of those making the comments are cucks. There are many comments that ask why the cuck doesn’t “eat the creampie”, others that say the male actors should “piss on the cucks face” and others that believe the cuck should join in by acting as the “fluffer” for the male models.

The majority of these scenes do include 720p and 1080p video downloads as well as photo downloads. I do believe 277 scenes is a lot for this niche, but I don’t generally join cuckolding sites so I could be wrong. It’s another good, not great site on this network and I would think those into cuckolding -- and can suspend their disbelief in the believability of it, would really enjoy these scenes. They are better acted than most of the scenes I’ve watched on this network.

02-26-21  05:54am

Replies (0)
Review
62
Visit Cuckoldest

Cuckoldest
(0)

92.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: This one hit two of my fetishes: cuckolds and older men

There are only 28 scenes at this point. They are only updating once per month.

Good enough scenarios, the titles kind of tell you what the scenes are about.

Excellent video quality and unlimited downloads.
Some bisexual parts with the men.

The models are all attractive except that little slim, young guy.
Cons: It’s a small site and it is not going to grow very fast at one update per month. This is a site they should be focusing on.

Any cuckold scene has the feeling of it’s not a real couple and that does hurt some believability.
Bottom Line: The basis of this site is like most cuckold sites. The difference is most cuckold sites have people of similar age. This one does not. This has older husbands with wives that look late 20s to late 30s and they get the believable cuck story. She tells her older husband, she is young and horny, he is not satisfying her. He doesn’t want to lose his younger, sexy wife, so he finds a young stud to have sex with her while the husband watches or videos (that’s more in real-life, I think). I have never seen a cuckold site that truly portrays the cuckold properly. The way the cuckold is shown is fundamentally correct. They almost always show the cuckold as submissive and weak. I have worked in the field that covers this and it’s not a true representation. It’s okay for 3 out of 5 scenes. The other two need to be the male being dominant, even as he shares his wife. He is receiving an adrenaline rush and competitive boost by watching his wife with another man. It seems like porn would love shooting that style, but they do not.

There is one guy that is in most of the scenes. He’s a handsome guy, bearded, muscular and well-endowed. The scenes with the much older husbands are easily the best. I believe a man’s ego lowers as he gets older. He may enjoy watching his young wife have sex. They have one of my favorite older male porn stars, his name is John M. I find him very attractive for the old “porn” role. The younger guy that is in most of the scenes has the stereotypical name of Peter Stallion. That makes me laugh just to type.

The part I am glad I looked at KayTBuffs review to see, there is bisexual parts between the men. Porn does not realize that ends the cuckold part. If the husband is bisexual, it’s a bisexual threesome. They also have the older guy that is in many older/younger scenes Dirty Gunther, he’s okay, I think he is getting close to being too old. He gives his all in his performances, but you can see he is probably going to pump his last breath out of him.

I don’t know if it’s because these are Europeans. The young men in these scenes seem to be very comfortable with the bisexual parts with the older men. That is something I like a lot about this network. The scenes are fun and happy. You see smiles and thumbs up. I think this site reaches as broad of an audience as any site could. The gay porn fans I know love the daddy/son, you get that. You get the sharing. You get older/younger, bisexual, if they add a transsexual they have everything covered.

This site will be one I will keep an eye on and plan on downloading the one new scene per month. The newest scene on it is probably the best for straight men. The woman is very attractive. I do think this is part of the future of porn. If you look at amateur sites the cuckold, the bisexual man, it is all becoming more common. I reviewed a site earlier about older women that was updating 4 times per month. If that could do that on this site, I believe they could have a real winner on their hands. I know that most straight guys won’t agree, but there is something sexy to me about seeing a younger man having sex with a younger woman, while her older husband licks both of them, at the same time.

Very recommended just for the various niches it covers.

01-12-22  08:48am

Replies (0)
Review
63
Visit Cum Bang

Cum Bang
(0)

87.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: More interracial gangbangs, this time it’s white guys with one black woman.

Only 95 scenes, but they do include a video and photos.

Hasn’t updated since January 2020.

Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.

105 female models which surprises me since I didn’t notice any scenes with more than one woman.

Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.

Uses Epoch as the biller.
Cons: No updates hurts what is already a relatively small site.

Playing racial stereotypes in the older scenes including all the guys wearing shirts with confederate flags on them.

Older scenes video downloads are misleading, listed as Big HD, but are only 480p.

The story in the older scenes is almost always the same, the black woman’s black husband cheated on her so she’s getting revenge by gangbanging a group of white men -- including some that are much older.

4K versions of the videos cost $4 per scene
Bottom Line: I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.

I believe a site like this one has more potential than the black guys on white woman gangbang sites do simply because you don’t see the group of white guys having sex with a black woman gangbang very often.

The racial stereotypes they play in the early scenes could possibly offend some people. The guys wear a shirt (some even have socks) with a confederate flag on it and the shirt says, “Dixie Stud - I would take one for the flag”. That follows the earlier setup of those scenes of the black woman’s black husband cheating on her. They did seem to drop the shirts (and socks) after a year of using it.

The scenes are still repetitive. They do seem to get a few scenes where maybe the woman is really into one of the guys and doesn’t switch. She will have sex with one guy for nearly the whole scene or half the scene while giving blowjobs and handjobs to the others. A lot of the older scenes are also very short considering there are 6-7 people in the scene, some as short as under 20 minutes. The newer scenes average more in the 30-40 minute range and there are some really pretty black women in these scenes.

I don’t know if they get much credit for the story since it doesn’t change much from scene to scene. The newer scenes have generic stories. I thought the best scene was Nia Nacci. She is having her 19th birthday and her white boyfriend walks in with a cake. She makes a wish and tells him what she wished for (19 cocks). The boyfriend motions and 18 more guys walk in.

You do get 1080p and 720p downloads on the majority of the videos and I liked this one a little better than most of the other sites just because of the different dynamic.

02-26-21  05:57am

Replies (0)
Review
64
Visit Cum Blast City

Cum Blast City
(0)

57.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A site I thought I might like based on me liking a site that had dildos squirting fake cum on women.

316 scenes total and they are listing updates, but there were 276 scenes on the site in 2015.

Newest videos are 1080p, no other download options other than downloading the scene in parts.

This usually lands in the cons, but the scenes are short and it’s a pro.

Photos of the models posing with downloads.
Cons: This will be the first time I ever listed this as a con, the women. There are some average looking women on here and they are the best looking women on the site.

There’s not even humor involved despite the fake cumshots.

The women trying to act like the cum is real.

The edit in every scene where I assume the male attaches or connects the cum squirter.

The older scenes are 480p
Bottom Line: I joined a site a while back called Slime Wave. I thought I would hate it, it has dildos shooting large amounts of cum on the women. I liked it. I thought this site would be similar. It’s not. This site instead of having strategically placed squirting dildos, just has a man getting a blowjob, then he says he’s going to cum. The woman moves back, there is a video edit, and the continuous flood of cum squirts “out of his dick”. As much as I enjoyed Slime Wave, the site which is similar in its gimmick, seemed to lose my interest when the edit happened. I am not for sure if the man has some sort of sprayer he is squirting the fake cum from, but do believe that is what I didn’t like about this site. With Slime Wave, the fake cum was being shot out of fake dicks (dildos) with no man in sight. With this site, a real man with a real dick, is shooting fake cum out.

I have been a member of two different sites with clear edits in their scenes. I believe that may be the most off-putting action possible in a porn scene.

The site is large with 316 scenes, but I didn’t find myself interested in watching more than the ending to see if all the scenes have the obvious edit. From the ones I watched they all had the same edit right before the cumshot. I don’t understand the thinking behind this or the arousal for the viewer. It’s like watching a reality show only to find out it’s fake on the last episode. When one of my pros is the “scenes are short” it probably isn’t a good sign. Most of the scenes I watched, you can’t see the time on the scenes until you start watching/streaming or download them, were around 7 minutes. These look like they could just use the content from their other sites for the first 95% of the video, throw the edit in and introduce the gimmick of the real dick shooting gallons of fake cum. I wasn’t going to review this site until I noticed the dates on the scenes do show the site as updating weekly. I have read various member reviews about this network recycling their content and based on the The Best Porn review there were 276 scenes in 2015. There are only 316 scenes in 2021, but they show weekly updates. I am sure if there were weekly updates there would be far more updates in 6 years than 40.

I do find the site to be a negative on what is at best -- an okay network. The women try to act their way through the scenes on this specific site. They try to act like the fake cum surprises them and excites them. It has too much of a parody feel to the site. Which represents the biggest problem this site causes the entire network. The women on this site “act” like they do in their other scenes on the network. I also have now found my most disliked part of porn, an obvious edit in a scene.

The women on this site are average looking at best. There really isn’t anything that positive about this site other than network access. This site combined with their newer sites in the network makes me think a full network review will be sufficient instead of reviewing all the sites in the network. If you are familiar with Slime Wave or any of the sites that use fake cum shooting from dildos, do not believe this site has the same appeal. The sites with dildos shooting fake cum look more like a fetish and go into the Wet And Messy niche. This site fits the edited and should have been scrapped -- niche. Maybe they have scrapped it, but showing that it’s still updating weekly only makes it worse. This is one of my lowest scores for an individual site.

05-11-21  03:43pm

Replies (1)
Review
65
Visit Cum For Cover

Cum For Cover
(0)

88.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A site about a lot of cumming men and the women willing to try and use their faces and mouths to catch it.

This is going to appeal to those into “almost” bisexual men.

It’s also going to appeal to those that like watching women see how fast they can make multiple men cum.

There are 98 scenes and I have a feeling I will download all 98 (something I usually don’t do)

Very pretty women for this type of porn. I even knew a couple (Veronica Leal and Anastasia Brokelyn)
Cons: It seems to be a trend with this group. There are scenes from pre-2008, a large space of nothing, then the scenes started back, causing some inconsistency in the quality.

No new updates in 10 months.
Bottom Line: I will start with why I said this could appeal to “almost” bisexual male fans. Some of these women aren’t messing around. You stick 5-6 dicks in their face and they’ll stick two, even three of them in their mouth at the same time. You also get the part probably only women notice like when the one guy cums really hard and it hits one of the other guys on accident. Talk about having to work in a dangerous environment.

What impresses me most is the length of these scenes. Most are at least 40 minutes long. That means these women are most likely going through these 5-8 guys without any editing and getting all 5-8 of them off. It’s impressive especially when you see how pretty some of the models are. They do not look like they should be in this type of porn. They look more like they should be in softcore porn, being feminine and pretty. But here they are swapping 5-8 dicks in and out of their mouths and hands. A few of the older scenes do have two women in them instead of just one. I believe there’s a market for this niche. There are the women like me who wonders what it would be like to have this many men standing nude in front of me and there are the men who maybe fantasize about being in a group of men having their way with a beautiful woman.

I am going to mention the picture sets. These are professional quality photo sets that focus on the model. Those make for a good footnote to the scenes. Just when you’re watching her weave her way through the web of dicks, look back at her clothed picture and how pretty and even innocent she looks.

I think this site more than any from this group leaves me wanting more. I have watched these types of scenes from other studios, but these are really good, even the poorer video quality old scenes. These sites could really get away, at least with me, with focusing on remastering their older videos instead of worrying about new updates. The content is that good.

You get 98 scenes, there is enough inconsistency in the video quality, I can’t even put a number on how many scenes have 1080p and 720p, I can say 19 have 4K, 1080p and 720p, just glancing over the rest it looks like half of the scenes have 720p and 1080p, those have the little HD badge on them, but they’re mixed up so maybe they have been doing some remastering.

It’s a niche I believe has more potential than the porn companies seem to believe. It’s another site that I won’t score too high since it does look like they’re not going to update anymore, but will score high enough to say give it a look.

09-07-21  04:44pm

Replies (0)
Review
66
Visit Curry Creampie

Curry Creampie
(0)

77.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Rare, at least to me, amateur porn from India. I am from India.

Pretty models wearing traditional Indian clothes and jewelry

It feels like a con, but 158 scenes of authentic amateur porn from India is a lot.

Long scenes with most being over 30 minutes.

Maybe it’s the amateur part, but there’s more kissing, touching, and build-up than most hardcore scenes I’ve watched recently.
Cons: Not for sure the appeal, even the taboo of these scenes are evident to those not from India.

While these are older scenes, it seems like the video quality should be better than 480p tops.

No pictures, would have been interesting to see more of the clothing, jewelry to see all the taboos being touched on.

I am putting this as a con even though I see it as a pro. There are cumshots, facials, the site is listed as creampie.
Bottom Line: Finding porn from with real amateurs from India is not easy to do. You can find solo models from India on some of the more glamour sites, but hardcore, in traditional Indian clothing, is what I’m going to call very rare.

This is an older site with no updates, but I hadn’t ever seen it. If you look online you will see how rare any Indian porn is. Finding a site with 158 scenes is not really exciting, but more intriguing. One complaint that really jumps out at me. The women -- possibly being “amateurs” look at the camera way too much. Even in cowgirl position, looking back over their shoulder at the camera. I would even call that distracting from the scenes. I would have liked pictures too. While you can see the women’s clothing and jewelry at the beginning of the scenes they do not stay dressed very long. A lot of the taboo potential has to do with the clothing being on while at least some sexual act is being performed.

I cannot tell you if all these models really are from India. There are several different subcultures of Indian people. A few of the models do look more Romany to me. And we will have a geographical, racial argument discussion on our hands if we get into whether Romany people are Indian -- the Romany are officially considered Aryan-Indo.

The sex itself is quite good. There’s kissing, it’s very inspiring to see an Indian woman grabbing a hard penis while kissing a man. Traditional ways in India put the woman in the extreme submissive role. I do get the feeling most of these women are amateurs and one big reason I say that is they look confused, maybe uncomfortable if they guy pulls out to give them a facial. They do not open their mouths and turn their faces to the side. The men do not look to be Indian, at least not all of them. At least a few of the scenes are even titled, “White Boys and Indians”. This doesn’t really matter either way to me. It does bring another part into question, most of these women have trimmed pubic hair, that’s not really common in India, but I also notice very few tattoos, which is more common in India.

It would help if the women talked. I could tell if they were speaking Hindi. There’s not much talking, but there is a lot of moaning and the sex itself is the strongest part of the site. It’s very believable for porn.

From what I can tell these scenes are taken from DVDs. They are numbered with the same title like, “White Boys and Indians scene #1”. That does mean the quality of the video is not even average in 2021. They give you four download options from 160p to 480p. The 480p is really better watched in a media player that has a “large” mode or one that lets you select the percentage of your monitor’s screen the video fills. I found using PotPlayer, a media player I hadn’t heard of before, works best with the 480p. You can set it to fill 50% or 75% of your screen giving you a bigger resolution than 480p, but not trying to stretch it out to 1080p.

I believe my opinion on this site is probably a little too high since I understand the taboos and know the rarity of finding this many hardcore Indian scenes on one site. I am still limiting my score. I like it more than my score shows. If you are interested in women from India it is definitely worth checking out. If you’re not into women from India, you probably won’t make it beyond the poor resolution quality of the videos.

07-13-21  09:53am

Replies (0)
Review
67
Visit Czech Hotties.com

Czech Hotties.com
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Nice size library of 126 videos and photosets.

However, the TBP review in 2011 mentions over 130.

Beautiful Eastern European models, thin and many are blondes.

The models are introduced stripping from nice clothes. I loved the sexy shorts for example

Easy searches for content

Part of 71 site PUBA network

The orgasms seem real and not faked
Cons: The scenes are not dated. The one listed as most recent is Standard Definition 640x480.

Low quality small photos. I saw the measurements for one as 1000x666.
Bottom Line: I like solo masturbation sites of all kinds, both male and female. If someone is having fun getting off, I can imagine myself witnessing or participating right along with them. I joined the Puba network for a few of their sites and this was one I had hoped would be one of their better ones. The women are uniformly young, pretty, thin and sexy to a fault. The scenes start with the model stripping to nude from ordinary street clothes. The outfits were not exotic or designed for a porn scene. No lingerie or stripper clothes are to be seen. Many of them are wearing short shorts and these showcase their legs. In many cases I saw enhanced breasts and those I don’t like.

In the scenes have the models use fingers to get them off. In most videos there are dildos and in some there are other toys. At this point I must stop and explain. These are old videos by porn standards. I saw only Standard Definition videos and the quality a mere 640x480. That would date these scenes as pre 2010, as around then we started to see High Definition. In 2011 the review by The Best Porn mentions there were over 130 videos and today there are 126. At the time these videos were new, there were nowhere near the quality or variety of sex toys we have now. No wands are on the site, in fact there is not a single battery either.

Given that limitation, the action is both oral and anal. Some scenes have a dildo in her mouth, simulating oral sex. Some scenes have the expecting vaginal insertion, but others also have anal insertions. I saw some ass to mouth and a lot of dildo licking too. In a few scenes there is a double penetration that was a visual treat. Further, there are some large dildos, but not extremely large, some are black and some are white. There are a few lesbian scenes too. They use fingers, dildos and toys on each other, but they also use tongues.

Although there is no talking, which is common in Eastern European porn, there was quite a bit of moaning and other noises that did not sound fake or just acting. I think these women got off on what we witnessed.

If I were writing this in 2011, this would get a higher score. In spite of this being part of a large network, the low quality is a deal breaker. I love the concept and wish new, more high quality updates were coming.

09-07-21  05:03pm

Replies (0)
Review
68
Visit Deeper

Deeper
(0)

94.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I knew I would eventually find a hardcore, dark, artsy combination site.

Excellent production values, some scenes tie together and the scenes are long (some over an hour).

The model list isn’t huge, but they have 116 models that are all I would think in the top 10% of models in looks. All are pros as far as I can tell.

There are 163 scenes and they update 4 times a month.

The video quality is maybe the best I have seen. It could even be overkill. The file sizes are huge. Picture sets are also downloadable and very professional.

Probably the best alternative to Pure Taboo. Even tops Pure Taboo in some ways.

Easy site to use, but they push their upsells of their other sites in ads.
Cons: They limit you to 25 downloads per week and that limit starts on day 1 of your membership. If you don’t download any scenes in your first week as a member you just lost 25 downloads. If it was 100 per month it wouldn’t be a big deal since they do only have 163 scenes, but they are limiting you to 25 per week. It’s not as bad as it sounds.

As good as the production values are there is a sameness that creeps into the scenes. They do have scenes that are part of series that do not fall into sameness. Those are produced by semi-retired model Kayden Kross.

They show you what looks like good deals on upsells, but don’t show the price until you click to upgrade.
Bottom Line: This is exactly the type of site I look for. There’s creativity, story, there’s hardcore sex, they list it as passionate sex with light kink. They mostly leave out the taboos, but if you’re a fan of Pure Taboo you will likely enjoy this site.

This site is owned by the group that owns Blacked.com, Blacked Raw, Tushy Raw, Tushy and Vixen. They are now offering a package that includes all those sites and Deeper for one price, but they don’t show the price. I think that’s worth mentioning if you’re into those sites. I have only been a member of Blacked.com and Tushy. I didn’t think those were anything special, but Deeper is like a completely different site from those. I say that because Blacked.com and Tushy were very similar to me. Deeper is just that. It adds a much deeper feeling to the scenes. I don’t think the download limit is terrible. It’s obviously set up the way it is to get you to stay as a member for more than a month and I plan on doing that. Two months should be enough to get all the scenes I want to download.

The models are really outstanding. I didn’t recognize one named Sofi Ryan, but thought that’s the kind of model I think men want to see. Emily Willis is on here too and I know she’s popular. Gianna Dior, September Reign, Adriana Chechik, just to name a few. There’s not an unattractive model on here.

The video quality could explain why they have download limits. They offer these resolutions on all 163 scenes -- 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and three mobile resolutions. The newest scenes offer those resolutions too, but have much higher bitrates and are massive files. The newest scene’s 4K resolution video is nearly 12GB, the 1080p is 6GB, the 720p is 4GB, even the 480p is 1GB. Besides higher bitrates on the newer scenes they also are long scenes. The Muse series has 3 episodes in it and is the newest 3 scenes. The 3 scenes combined are 3 hours and 20 minutes.

Just like there isn’t an unattractive model, I don’t think there is a scene I would want to skip from downloading. It feels like they took a risk with this content since it looks like the softer hardcore porn, but it’s not soft.

There are 116 models which when combined with the number of scenes tells you there are quite a few scenes with multiple models in them. That’s the touch of kink they added. I have been very happy with the content I have watched from here and think it’s one of the best sites I have been a member of. I definitely would recommend it to those into hardcore scenes, but maybe think “does it have to be that hardcore?”. They do a very good job, especially the series scenes, of being just edgy enough to be exciting, but not too hardcore to make the scenes feel uncomfortable. One of the best sites I have joined this year.

10-06-20  12:13am

Replies (0)
Review
69
Visit Devils Film

Devils Film
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Large, multi-niche network that has a few of my favorite niches in large numbers.

7,198 scenes with a new scene added every 3-4 days.

All newer scenes have 160p - 1080p download options.

Navigation works well if you can control your clicking.

Most scenes also come with downloadable pictures.

Good streaming player if you're not interested in downloading the videos.
Cons: A lot of the non-fetish content seems generic to me.

The filter options are confusing and make it best for people who know exactly what they're looking for.
Bottom Line: Devil's Films is a porn studio that while maybe are not that known for it, are one of the best studios for fetish and alternative content. The biggest draw for me are the 147 bisexual scenes. That is bigger than many standalone bisexual sites and the content is high quality. They also are still releasing new bisexual scenes which can only be said for a few sites. There are 723 transsexual scenes too. The best part about their transsexual scenes is they have a large amount of threesomes that include a male, a transsexual and a female. You don't see that a lot anymore. There are only a few sites that I know of that have transsexuals with women. That touches on my interest in bisexual sex and adds a woman to the mix. Those close to 900 combined scenes are my main interest on Devil's Film.

They still have another 7,000 scenes for everyone else. The scenes I have watched that are not bisexual or transsexual do give me a generic feeling. Everything seems scripted, timed and logged. It doesn't mean the content is bad. It just means it's not what I'm into.

Their video quality is impressive with 1080p and down being available on nearly all their videos and the newer videos add the 4K option. The pictures are just screencaps, but they are downloadable and they do have over 200+ in nearly every set. They are not high resolution pictures.

Besides the bisexual and transsexual scenes they have a large collection of stepfamily scenes from their series, "Out of the Family", it has 857 just from that series. There are lesbian series, a hairy series, a teen series and over 350 gangbang scenes in their Devil's Gangbang series. I do believe most if not all of the models are pros. I don't know all of them, but most do look familiar.

I believe anyone trying Devil's Films should have a reason besides "porn". They cover a lot of niches and fetishes. The filter system is very useful once you get the hang of it, but until you do, there's a good chance you're going to click the wrong filter and get yourself lost in a sea of scenes. It's a large network that is really more fetish-heavy than I think most realize. Nearly a third of their scenes are transsexual, bisexual, stepfamily and gangbang. If you're into any of those you will find a lot to like and download. The downloads are unlimited as long as you join using the download option and not the streaming-only option.

09-09-20  02:06am

Replies (0)
Review
70
Visit Dirty Doctor

Dirty Doctor
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A terrific site for many women’s favorite fantasies.

Great looking men and women.

Nice video quality as all scenes are in HD.

Excellent photo sets with one for each video.

Vendo is a very trusted biller.

Comes with a network of 34 other teen sites that I liked.
Cons: No discount through Porn Users. I recommend looking around on the internet for a better price.

Too small and not updating. I want more.
Bottom Line: I have a complaint about Teen Mega World. They start sites that I love and then stop updating them. Dirty Doctor has only 38 HD scenes and they stopped adding new ones in 2017 and in 2016 they had only one new update.

What a shame. Dirty Doctor has a lot going for it. To begin with, it is a fantasy come alive for me and many other women. My gynecologist is gorgeous and getting naked for him makes me so hot. He is all business, but I always leave his office feeling like I need to take care of my business when I get home.

The doctors on the site are some of the best older men I have seen in porn. There are several niches featured on Dirty Doctor and one is old and younger. Another is the uniform fetish, as the doctors look the role. There is even a scene where a nurse in uniform “works” along with the doctor.

I wish the scenes were in English as that would add a lot. In the opening of the story, a young lady enters her doctor’s office. They talk for a few moments and I wish I knew what they were talking about. Next she goes behind a partition and she strips. Why? She is about to show him all her intimate parts but she is shy? Then he does the usual doctor things like a pap smear or inserts a speculum. He looks down her throat and she says ah. He has her spread wide in stirrups.

But there is a twist. He breaks every rule regarding sex with his patients. When he gives her a pap smear, he also sticks his fingers inside and stimulates her. He rubs her clit. After he takes the speculum out, he inserts his cock. When he looks down her throat and then takes out the stick, he puts his other hard stick in. When she is spread out in the stirrups, he uses a vibrator on her. In one scene he inserts anal beads while he is massaging her clit. OMG. I need a doctor like this.

In a few scenes, he acts like he is enjoying this, but in most it is played deadpan as if this was routine and normal in a doctor’s office visit. In one scene he has her bend over so he can check her out from behind. He suddenly becomes a clown and makes gestures as if this was a comedy being played out for the audience.

When she leaves he sometimes gives her some medication. I don’t know if he helped her with her “condition” but he sure helped me with mine.

I have seen some of these models before, so I expect these are pros. I am not familiar enough with European models to know who they are. You also get a huge, 34 site teen network as part of your join price. I would give this a 90, but the small number of videos is a big negative in an otherwise near perfect site.

09-28-20  08:54pm

Replies (0)
Review
71
Visit Divine Bitches

Divine Bitches
(0)

92.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Men begging for a pegging.
Most of the scenes are believable.
Around 450 scenes with new scenes being added twice a month.
An underrated niche that is -- according to research -- more common than we think.
Some of the scenes lead you into the what did I just watch feeling, but most of the guys believably enjoy being dominated by the wide array of Kink models.
Included with the Kink network, which has 83 other Kink sites.
Cons: A few of the women models do not do a very good job of convincing the viewer they are dominating the man.
I would like to see gangbang action, 3 or 4 women with strap-ons, taking turns on the guy.
Going against the first con, some of the women do too good of a job of convincing they dominated the man.
Bottom Line: I have been a member of Kink's network since the launch day. I like the debauchery of their content.

Divine Bitches is my favorite Kink site. It is not perfect. None of the Kink sites are. You have to come into these sites with a suspension of disbelief. That is why Divine Bitches is a good site for me. The guys do a believable enough job of making you think they are willing to let the woman stick her dildo up their butt - just so they can get closer to her. I have seen numbers as high as 20% of married couples have experimented with pegging. Of the married couples I know, the number is even higher.

There is not a lot of story in these scenes. Kink sometimes can get too deep into a story. The setting and feel of the scenes has changed over the years. The older scenes relied on a very attractive female model seducing her boy toy into bending over for her. He was usually given -- in trade -- vaginal intercourse with her. The settings included doctor's offices, bedrooms, hotels, the more recent scenes go to a more dominant style of the female giving him no choice. He could be tied up, blindfolded, whipped into submission or in a few of the newer ones, the female is much bigger physically.

All Kink scenes have a short part at the end where the males, females involved in the scene talk about the experience and how much they enjoyed it.

There are scenes that include cuckolds. Those are not common, but are as believable as any cuckold scene is. It usually involves the acting wife to use her strap-on on her acting husband, in his butt, in his mouth, while the other man has sex with her or receives a blowjob from her.

This is common on Kink, the older scenes, are usually the best ones. One disappointment for me is Kink seems to no longer look for that one model that can consistently pull the niche/scene off. Mia Little has been featured several times in the last year; she is good at this niche, but they almost always put the man in bondage.

My favorite recent scene features Aaliyah Love dominating Corbin Dallas. As small as she is and as many times as she has been the submissive one, she seems to channel an inner dominatrix. Her and Corbin seem to really enjoy the scene.

The scenes are very long for scenes without much story and with usually only two people -- averaging in the 50 minutes to 70 minutes range -- you get your money's worth out of these scenes.

I would be remiss to say some straight men probably would not like this content. Some of the scenes do get very rough. There are some in the older scenes where you think the guy's balls are going to literally explode from the rope torture. The content has been toned down now. It is like watching a regular porn scene except it does not start with the woman on her knees, but she usually is on her knees at the end of the scene.

With a year subscription, I do not download a lot, the scenes can be very large in file size. Their streaming player works very well for me. Against the type of site it is, some of the best scenes, are the ones where the woman starts to laugh -- in a feeling sorry for him way. I would like to see them bring more of the mainstream models in to shoot these scenes. There are several scenes where the female pats the male on the back and hugs him like she is sorry she is doing that bad thing to him.

I like the dark humor in Kink's style of porn and Divine Bitches does dark humor as good as any of their sites.

07-14-19  02:26am

Replies (2)
Review
72
Visit Doc Squirt

Doc Squirt
(0)

74.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good site that is only held back by its small size

Includes access to four other sites

Pro models including a few I really like (Roxy Lips and Roxy Sky)


Three separate download options on videos including 4K, 1080p and 720p

Uses CCBill as biller if you select “alternate biller”.

Scenes are surprisingly long despite hardly no story (30+ minutes, with some in the 40+ minutes range).
Cons: Varying consistency in the “squirt”.

Navigation on the “network” is okay, but it shows terrible inconsistencies.

There are screen captures, but no pictures and the screen captures are not downloadable.
Bottom Line: The site has some strong positives. The video quality on all the scenes is excellent. They have even started adding updates again after what looks like a Covid break. The 4 sites that are included are: Slim4K, MyTinyWish, DudCast and Xfeeds.net, from what I can tell the Xfeeds.net is just a site that collects all the content from Slim4K, MyTinyWish, DudCast and Doc Squirt into one location. That’s why I said there’s terrible inconsistency. Doc Squirt only shows 15 scenes, but if you search in the categories, there are 27 squirting videos. It looks like they tried to make everything look more complicated than it is and it made the sites more complicated than they need to be.

The scenes do follow a similar plot. I will go into my experience of “squirting”. It is possible for an aroused woman to squirt, but I assume porn directors and producers don’t take the time to look up definitions. A squirt is a small quantity of liquid ejected from something. That’s when you know the squirt is real and some of these scenes do have women ejaculating or squirting small amounts of liquid. The rest are doing the porn-loved fountain squirt that soaks the entire room. That is accomplished by pressing on the bladder. Much talk is about g-spot stimulation with the fountain squirt, but it’s bladder pressure. The g-spot stimulation causes the small squirt that isn’t near as visually impressive or -- soaking.

I thought both of the Roxy Lips scenes on Doc Squirt were excellent. She does seem to be a natural squirter and you can even watch the woman’s expressions. A lot of those fountain squirters are laughing. If a woman is having an orgasm that causes fluid to squirt across a room she’s not going to be laughing. I have seen Roxy Lips on a few other sites showing her squirting ability. The other Roxy (Sky), just puts on a great performance, she’s very energetic and into the scene. It seems like as long as squirting has been in porn someone would realize how fake or real the squirting looks.

The size of the site is disappointing and it’s one reason I decided to review it. I joined through Doc Squirt since it looked like they had at least 30-40 or more scenes on the site, but it only shows 15 once in the member area. The recent updates include 3 over the last month. The scenes I could live without are the ones where the guy sticks multiple fingers in the woman and jerks his arm as fast as possible since if you do that to any woman she’s going to urinate on you! This niche would be better served with a “Mistress Squirt” instead of Doc Squirt. They could easily find women who are capable of teaching most women to at least ejaculate a little liquid. Instead, it’s more of the same as it has been for the last 10 years of a man showing the bladder weakness of women if their insides are being stretched open. It’s a good site when combined with the network, but as a site on its own it wouldn’t be worth most people’s time unless they really liked specific models. The model list follows the problems of the navigation since it doesn’t separate the models scenes by site. It just shows you that a model has 4 scenes and one of each of those could be on one of each of their sites, even if you are on the Doc Squirt site.

02-09-21  06:56pm

Replies (0)
Review
73
Visit DogFart

DogFart
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The entire Dogfart network consists of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.

Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.

Uses Epoch as the biller.

The network updates 4 times per week.

The network has 1,598 female models.

Over 6,000 scenes with downloadable videos and photos.
Cons: The whole network has a $4 charge per 4K scene download.

Of the 23 sites, I liked at most 4 of them and would call the rest average or below.

There’s a near total lack of creativity on this network.
Bottom Line: I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.

The first hint telling me this is a network directed at men was they list two gay sites on their network. One is Blacks And Boys, the other is Gloryholes and Handjobs. How does that tell me it’s directed at men? They also have a site called Zebra Girls that is about interracial lesbian (gay) sex, but it’s not listed as gay. It’s probably something only a woman would notice, but they’re making it clear lesbians are okay for straight guys, but giving a fair warning to straight guys when there’s a gay male scene.

My overall feeling is the network is not bad as a whole. Nearly all of the sites have at least some good scenes, but my main complaint is the way they focus on certain sites in their new updates and update schedule. I know the Gloryhole.com site has been around a long time, so why keep updating it when you have newer sites that are more creative and just by reading user comments on the scenes are much more liked?

I will use this as an example, the “gay” sites are not very popular as most of the scenes don’t even have any user comments on them, so they stopped updating them. It shows they understand the concept of putting out content your users want, but then you see a site like Blacks on Blondes that has nearly 1,000 scenes and they’re updating it once per week. They’re updating Gloryhole.com twice per month and it has nearly 700 scenes. While the similar, but more creative and -- in my opinion -- better sites like Gloryhole Initiations and We Fuck Black Girls have less than a combined 500 scenes and are only updated once per month. I’m not throwing out a generalization here. The user comments show that members want more of those two sites, but instead are getting the scenes from the same sites that have the most content on them.

The video quality is similar on all 23 sites. All newer scenes have 720p and 1080p download options. They also include a downloadable photo set with each scene. All of the older scenes on all of the sites are 480p. Only a few of the sites aren’t like that and they are the newer sites which are the better sites. Even with the site, Zebra Girls, I can’t imagine why they don’t push it more. It also only gets one update per month.

The network is massive in size and there’s no way you can go through it all in one month. I didn’t feel like any of the solo model sites were worth reviewing. A lack of creativity is bad enough, but adding to it that the same woman is in every scene just makes it too monotonous.

I can’t say I was disappointed in the network and would even say maybe I was a little happier (overall) with it than I expected I would be, but I won’t be joining it again. In comparison to other interracial sites I have been a member of, I do think it’s one of the better ones, especially the newer scenes. I just don’t think it’s that great as a whole network.

02-26-21  06:09am

Replies (0)
Review
74
Visit Dom The Nation

Dom The Nation
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Updates every two weeks, excellent for a specialized niche site

Extremely high level of creativity

Has links with discounts for its sister BDSM sites, Assylum and Slavemouth

Not only a fetish site for BDSM, it works as an older/younger site and a rarity for porn, every scene is outdoors in a rural, natural setting

Uses tags like painal, whipping, and impact play.These are specific to BDSM scenes
Cons: Less than 40 updates and six are only a few photos

The videos and photo sets are not separated
Bottom Line: Some sites are easy to compare to their competitors as they have a lot in common. Very few sites can be truly called unique or original. But then again I occasionally run across the rare site that is so different that it can truly be called out of the norm, in a way that you can only hope that others will imitate. You may well ask, what is so different? Two people or more take off their clothes and do the deed, so how is this site worthy of singling out for praise?

Porn is about fantasy and many times the porn you see is not truly how it is done offscreen by regular people like you and me. A great example is that most lesbian porn is a fantasy for men and real lesbians have told me that they don’t like a lot of it. This site is a work of love by real life Dom Neil, who found much of the BDSM porn made today does not appeal to him.

He is also quite a camera artist and loves the freedom and beauty of nature. If the idea of seeing scenes shot outdoors day and night, with all levels of lighting appeals to you, this is your site. If you love seeing rented farmland, or mountains, streams and models having fun appeals to you, this just may be your site. The same is true for camerawork that should be studied and imitated on how to get the essence of the model’s personality. Or maybe you just like unrehearsed, never overplanned and never boring BDSM with great models who enjoy their work.

In some of the first few updates, you get journal entries and playful scenes more than the sex scenes. The site started off a bit slowly as they started filming in 2019, but delayed the launch until February of 2021. As a result the site does not have a ton of content. The planning that went into filming the site gives it a lot of potential moving forward. The models wear custom made audio collars that work well in order to pick up sounds outdoors. Every scene is shot with the panorama of nature a second focus to the models and the action.

The video specs can be confusing. The main thing to note is the films are presented in 2.39:1 (very widescreen) cinema format, using film with some anamorphic lenses, and when you desqueeze the image from the lenses, this is the size you get. It's great for capturing the beauty and presence of the landscapes. The movies on the site are filmed in cinemascope and the actual videos specs are a bit different from regular 16:9 video specs due to the cinemascope format.

All of the sexual content revolves around very hard BDSM. If you find a site like this to be appealing, you will find a lot to like such as difficult positions, bondage, anal, rimming, forceful oral and peeing. In every case, he makes sure the models act out fantasies they have and gets the maximum pleasure from them captured on film. There is also playful content that helps you see a real, very accessible side to the models too. An example of one of the playful scenes has Rory Knox using a blow dryer on the Dom’s underwear as an example of another kind of blowjob. Another scene that I enjoyed was the same Rory Knox giving Dom Neil a foot job. She licked every toe and took his foot into her mouth as acts of worship like I have never seen before.

In another with a high level of male fantasy, Audrey Holliday who was beaten and anally abused while, hold on, playing football. I can imagine a guy grabbing a beer and watching this scene in a loop during halftime. My absolute favorite scene was any of the three that Rebel Rhyder was in. The one where she was cosub with Brooke Johnson was amazing as they both obeyed Dom Neil in a scene worthy of an award. The interactions between them, as well as with Dom Neil, were enough to make me love the site.

The site was easy to use, except for the fact that the videos and the photo sets were mixed together. The site lists updates in chronological order, not by type. Additions currently are every two weeks, but the archive is still small with less than 40 and that includes photo updates. I liked the site and can confidently predict a great future for it as it has a great concept and does what it does very well.

10-28-21  07:41pm

Replies (0)
Review
75
Visit Dream Tranny

Dream Tranny
(0)

93.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Transsexual site that has two of my favorite transsexual niches – solo and transsexual sex with a female.

Large site with 560 scenes plus 206 scenes in their archive (first time I have seen a site have a separate archive). The site updates 3 times per week.

All transsexual sites are hit or miss with me on attractiveness from model to model. This one is too. But most are attractive with some very pretty transsexuals too. There are 322 models.

The navigation is very good. The search filters include everything you could possibly find on a transsexual site and that is good for me with my preference of solo/masturbation and transsexuals with females. Updates are easy to find, they even show previews of soon to come scenes.

Video downloads are available in 480p, 720p and 1080p. There are photosets with 100+ photos in 2000x3000 resolution, those are also downloadable.

The price is very good for this much high quality content.
Cons: Looking at the archive section, the video quality does drop on the older videos in it, but as mentioned, I haven’t ever seen a site split their content up between updates and archive. Some of the archive content has 1080p. A few of those scenes are just photosets. It is me trying to find something to list as a con.

The photo downloads all have the same filename. I have had that same problem on multiple other sites.
Bottom Line: This is one of the better transsexual sites I have been a member of. My two biggest interests in transsexual porn – as a straight woman, are the solo scenes and the scenes of the transsexuals having sex with a female. It fills in a gray area between bi-curious (for me) and I enjoy watching penises masturbated. That’s not a niche that any genre covers well, but I do believe the transsexual genre comes closest and this site especially does.

Using their search filters, I can see that they have 25 transsexuals having sex with females scenes. I would like that to be a little higher, but that’s part of liking a niche that isn’t mainstream. Some is better than none. Where this site makes me very happy is they have over 200 solo scenes. The number is higher, but because some masturbation scenes turn into sex scenes, I’m estimating at 200 to be on the safe side, most of those that come up as masturbation are solo. They use something I can’t say I’ve seen with transsexuals and that’s a fucking machine. It doesn’t fully register with me since I am most interested in watching the masturbation. It’s definitely not a distraction. You see more of the feminine side of these transsexuals with the fucking machines and even manual dildos. These two paragraphs represent my favorite content on the site.

There is a search filter I feel needs to be brought up. Natural breasts. More and more transsexuals are going to female hormone therapy and developing natural breasts instead of implants. I believe that adds a lot of value to this site. As I mentioned, one of my interests in transsexual is maybe a version of bi-curious. The transsexual having real breasts really goes into that curiosity. The only thing that is masculine about some of these models is their penis. Natural breasts makes that even more noticeable and I also believe natural breasts tempers expectations on the natural breasted transsexuals performance. If she doesn’t have the full masculine hormones, there’s a good chance she’s not going to be able to create a large ejaculation.

The sex scenes are surprisingly long, with many nearing the 40 minute range and that’s just not that normal in transsexual porn. It is hard to believe, but transsexual porn has already formed its own version of repetitive porn just like male/female straight porn has, but this site avoids that.

There isn’t a lot to find wrong with this site. Maybe they could cut back a little on the ads? It’s not bad, but when you first sign-in there is the page with multiple offers of other sites. Every page on the site also has a few ads across the top of the screen, but I guess they have to make money. It’s at least not distracting. I have said before I believe sites need to cater to a more balanced audience. This one does it as well as any site does. It has around 1/3 of its content in the solo niche, the 25 scenes of transsexual with a female and the rest is transsexuals with men or transsexuals with transsexuals. I like seeing the different niches within the genre covered.

As mentioned, this is a large site with over 700 scenes (including archives). The quality is excellent for a transsexual site with at least 75% of the scenes having up to 1080p downloads. The downloadable photosets with the 2000x3000 resolution. The near perfect navigation. The addition of the “natural breasts” search filter/tag. They just aren’t giving me much to complain about.

It’s up near the top of my favorite transsexual sites now. I would like to see them add some ladyboys, Asian transsexuals, but there are other sites that do that. It’s just an idea. This site has earned its score.

10-21-21  03:50pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 51-75 of 260 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.34 seconds.