| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
126
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The genre-defining site for legs and foot fetishist in an equally as impressive network.
An incredible 2,789 scenes. The updates have slowed to 1-2 per month, but this site is 3-4 times bigger than the other foot fetish sites.
Different from Footsie Babes, Hot Legs and Feet has as many lesbian scenes as male/female scenes and Hot Legs and Feet has more hose, stocking and pants used in their scenes than Footsie Babes.
The oldest scenes are from 2001. I was not legal age in 2001.
Features the top models out of Europe. Photos are studio photo set quality, not screencaps. |
| Cons: |
An advantage Footsie Babes has is they use the same men in different scenes, most of them are obvious foot fetishists. DDF's guys are good, but not quite as believable. Hot Legs and Feet makes up for it with the lesbian scenes. There is an added level of sensuality when it is two women.
All good things come to an end -- at nearly 3,000 scenes with sparse updates, it looks like Hot Legs and Feet might be nearing their end. |
| Bottom Line: |
If I was to pick two sites or networks to score highest they would be Kink and DDF. The network included with Hot Legs and Feet is one of the best and most diverse networks.
Hot Legs and Feet is the best site for reverse foot fetishists. The women here do a good job of acting like their feet and legs are not a big deal. The men and women show them their legs and feet are a big deal. I do not feel a lot of sensuality in porn or get the erotic feeling from most porn. This site does both or maybe it is a combination of them.
The use of fishnet hose to showcase the woman's toes, thighs and vagina creates a visual relation between points of sexual interest. Their scenes with stuck stockings becoming impossible to remove while having sex show a precursor to harder bondage acts. It hints at artsy with the struggling female trying to enjoy the sex while fighting her bound hosiery.
There are scenes with the added bonus of the models removing their hose only to wrap them around the man's penis. Is she doing it to to let him feel her silky hose or to hold onto him and not let him get away?
There are enough scenes here to come up with your own conclusions. With nearly 3,000 scenes including a video and picture set each, there is little to no competition for them in terms of quality and quantity.
If you use their tag system you see they have nearly 900 scenes with stockings, hose or leggings in them. Those outnumber the next biggest foot fetish sites in total content. Someone might ask why not join a site with stockings, hose and leggings as their focus; those sites are usually tease sites.
The tagging system works very accurately. I do wish I could use multiple tags to search, but either it doesn't work or they don't have any scenes with mini-skirt, fishnet and handjob.
The most recent 90-100 videos have 4K option. The 1,000 before those have 1080p option and the ones before those have 720p option to download.
Besides all of this high quality porn you also receive access to 1 by day, DDF Busty, Hands on Hardcore, Only Blowjob, House of Taboo, Euro Girls on Girls, Euro Teen Erotica, Eve Angel Official, Sex Video Casting, Cherry Jul, Sandy's Fantasies and Hairy Twatter.
If you are into the legs, feet, hose, leggings niches, 1 By Day and House of Taboo mix those in on a regular basis. It is for me the best of the foot fetish sites and a network worth keeping a long-term membership to. |
|
07-28-19 10:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
127
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It is rare, in my opinion, to see a site of unique, fetish content on a network -- House of Taboo is that.
Over 1,250 videos and 1,250 photo sets.
They are only averaging a couple updates per month, but there is a huge, excellent network included (DDF).
Should appeal to those that believe sites like Kink are too hardcore or too fetish-heavy. This is more like mainstream porn meets their kinky friend for a night of fun.
Rarely seen props and contraptions; in my opinion, these are probably made for DDF to be less strenuous or stressful on the models.
Very mainstream porn models are even in these scenes. With the content being exclusive I would think those are rarities. |
| Cons: |
Some of the models look overwhelmed even in the lesser restrictive bondage and props.
Not a high percentage, but 10% of the scenes don't even use a fetish. Maybe their costumes are the fetish? It's not a big deal. |
| Bottom Line: |
Kink's Network is my favorite bondage, BDSM network, but House of Taboo shows a lighter, more mainstream accessible side to bondage and BDSM.
I couldn't possibly cover all the niches and fetishes they cover. You do see a common theme of light bondage. It could be the model's hose tying her legs open or bounding her arms behind her back. They use minor ball and gag devices as well. They have scenes with what I believe in a homemade pillory, head/hands through holes to present the model as helpless.
In the cons, I mentioned some of the models looking overwhelmed. For some viewers of this type of content that is a good thing. When you watch bondage porn both the male and female are usually equally experienced and adept at using the bondage. You don't get that feeling here. You feel like the woman just had her arms bound behind her for the first time. I wasn't for sure if that is a con or pro. Experienced bondage sex can become repetitive. I listed it as a con because that could bother some viewers. It doesn't me. The House of Taboo scenes are entertaining and most of the time you see a very enthusiastic struggle from the female model. In my mind, they are torn between fighting the bondage and submitting to enjoy the sex.
One of the biggest differences between House of Taboo and a site like Sex and Submission is the amount of major star models on House of Taboo. The scenes are on the harder side of mainstream hardcore, including double penetrations, bound mouth with anal and even bound mouth and hands double penetration.
The newer scenes (last 12-18 months) could pass for Kink scenes, that is how hardcore they are becoming. I will share a tip to look at the older content if you are looking for the less hardcore. The older content has more girl/girl scenes and lighter fetishes like urinating/nurse watching and even a fucking machine similar to Kink's.
It is a steady progression and there is content from 2006 - current.
I have not had any problems using the site. It could be a little better with helping me (you, anyone) find similar scenes to the ones we like. They have tags and they work well, but I have seen some scenes that the tags are not right on.
If you are a downloading type, the photo sets can be downloaded and this genre is a good one for photos. I prefer their download options of videos. They have 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. The sites with too many options make it easy to click the wrong one. The streaming player is okay, it buffers a lot when I use it, but it could be my internet connection. The older videos do not have streaming option. They only offer downloads on those.
You also receive 16 other sites with the network. There have content in all of the mainstream categories.
House of Taboo is either my 1st or 2nd favorite site on the network. I will try to cover the fetishes I see the most often on it: urinating, light bondage, rough girl on girl, dual penetration, anal, costume (usually latex suits and masks) and props that could be as simple as a ball gag to a pillory. If I could fix one thing about it it would be more updates. |
|
08-11-19 09:29pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
128
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site that focuses on the pleasure and the intensity of a woman's emotions and feelings during an orgasm.
I don't want to compare this directly to The Female Orgasm, but did a review on it last week -- I prefer I Feel Myself.
They have 5,190 videos, these range from studio, homemade, closeup, fantasy and adventure.
These videos -- especially the newer ones -- are more explicit than other sites like the one and I see that as a plus.
Excellent use of artistic representations, the rooms are mostly bare, the light isn't blaring bright and it creates a distant, lonely feeling for the solo model.
They average 10-12 updates per month and as far as I can tell these are all amateurs.
Expresses the beauty of the female orgasm without requiring a perfect or fit body with models of all different shapes and sizes.
Billed through a biller I was not familiar with, GM Bill, but it was easy to use and easy to cancel. |
| Cons: |
The navigation is difficult. They have 12 videos per page, 433 pages.
It is not all solo, they have in the 700 range of girl/girl and boy/girl scenes. That's a tough con to use against them, but the site is I Feel Myself. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site should be joined for more than 1 month. I find the explicit, solo masturbation scenes to be my favorite. There's excellent camerawork that includes perfect sound. You see the women's faces as the orgasm, you hear their moans, you can see some of their orgasms causing contractions.
There's a high amount of voyeuristic quality to the scenes. You get the feeling of the fly on the wall.
I listed the non-solo scenes as a con, but only by definition of the site's name. Some of those scenes are very good. Of all the sites I have joined (not that many), this one has to be in the top 3 for eroticism.
You will find yourself not paying as much attention to how the model looks, or what her body shape and size is, instead, paying attention to her bodily movements, spasms, moans and how her hand carelessly reaches up to squeeze her nipple harder than she probably meant to.
I have told in previous reviews I am not a lesbian. I am not even bi-curious. I am drawn to this content for the natural sexual expression, it could be a man or woman and it would work either way.
The site itself doesn't have a lot to talk about. Over 5,000 videos, there's no model list, the navigation is close to archaic, but they do have ways for you to find the different content. If you find a model you like you can click her name and it will show you if they have other scenes of her. They have the scenes broken into categories including one called "friends" that focus on the scenes with girl/girl content and boy/girl content.
The site doesn't look like it is have been updated in layout style or programming in 20 years, but everything works well.
If I find anything truly disappointing with it it is the multi-month or long-term membership options. They offer a 3 month plan for $70. I am on my 6th week and probably would have been better off joining it for 3 months, but $70 just seems like a steep price to pay upfront.
I also wonder if they have considered making a boy/girl site in similar style. I usually prefer high production qualities. These scenes are probably the most basic I've seen and it works for them.
I'm going to go a little off-track by saying as much as I like the desolate, lonely room, I would like to see more open scenes, maybe outdoors or in a different room, position -- like on the couch or in the bathtub.
The video quality does vary. They have HD videos going back to 2009. I haven't seen any picture sets.
A lot of the older scenes are less explicit, but overall, this site has impressed me in nearly every way. I'll come back to it eventually. The content is worth the price. I would recommend it to men and women alike. This just doesn't feel like a porn site. It feels like genuine, human sexual expression and that's something you just don't see a lot of. Very highly recommended. |
|
09-16-19 10:48pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
129
|
Innocent High
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the premier schoolgirl sites.
Bills through Epoch.
They have 468 scenes, but the updates have slowed greatly.
Each scene has a video, photo set and screencaps, all can be downloaded.
Newer scenes are using variations on the traditional schoolgirl outfit and those are some of the best on the site.
Good site for those into fetishes, besides the outfits.Nearly all scenes depict an older man (teacher or tutor) with a young woman. There also is light to mild spanking in most scenes.
Almost all of the scenes have a short story to start (late for class, didn’t do homework, was caught cheating on a test). |
| Cons: |
Since April 2019 there have been only 5 updates. They are averaging about 1 update per 2 months.
They could have more lesbian scenes to cut back on the monotony of older male, younger female in every scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
Innocent High’s oldest scenes shows it started out as strictly a schoolgirl site with the models in the older videos all wearing the same outfit based on the fictional “Innocent High”. The newer scenes still have the schoolgirl outfits in most scenes, but they are no longer branded with the Innocent High logo on the uniforms like the old ones. This is an improvement. Other changes in the newer scenes include older female teachers having sex with younger male students. They also have started leaning on the home tutoring and home testing to give the scenes a different setting than just the same classroom they used in the earliest scenes.
The archive of content here helps offset the slow update schedule with 468 scenes you’re more likely to get bored with the content than run out of content. This site has been around a long time. The earliest scenes go back to 2005. Those scenes have a top video resolution of 576p. By 2011 they started adding 720p and 1080p resolution videos.
You basically have a handful of scenarios here: Student (male or female) is late for class, didn’t turn in homework, said a “bad” word in class and the teacher makes them stay after class as punishment. The spanking here is as much playful as it is serious though the lightest skin models do show the handprints on their butts. The newer scenes are more reminiscent of stepfamily porn even though there are no stepfamily scenes. The student goes to the teacher or tutor’s house or the teacher goes to the student’s house for extra credit and they sneakily have sex in the bedroom with the door closed or in the living room before the student’s parents come home. It does get redundant at times, but the girls are cute, the outfits are too, and the scenes are long. There’s more teasing early in these scenes than a lot of porn has in it.
This is a niche that seems to have lost its popularity in American porn, but if you’re a schoolgirl fan you’ll likely be pleased with this site. |
|
01-27-20 08:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
130
|
Interracial Blow Bang
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
The scenarios change a little, some scenes have 5+ men with 2 women, some just have 1 woman and it’s a blowjob gangbang.
There are 116 scenes with downloadable videos and pictures.
There also are 116 female models, but some are in more than one scene since some scenes have more than one female. |
| Cons: |
The older scenes advertise HD, but are only 480p.
They charge $4 per scene for 4K downloads and it says that’s a “special offer”.
Not a smithereen of a story in the scenes.
Hasn’t updated since March 2020. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
While I do miss the inclusion of any kind of setup or story, this site at least has enough debauchery in its scenes to make up for it -- mostly. They don’t, however, follow their site’s title. Most of the scenes include some other penetration besides oral. I don’t know if that helps it or not. It makes the scenes with more than oral look like the scenes on their other sites. This network has taught me one thing, use the mute button, there is way too much overacting, screaming, yelling out what they want the men to do to them even though the men are already doing it!
I haven’t been a member of many sites that have these “blow bang” themed scenes so I would think 116 scenes is a lot for the niche. The hotness of the scenes depends on the model. Not so much her looks or body, but how she responds. The scenes with the female being quieter and more focused on what she’s doing are good. The ones where the female sounds like she’s being whipped across a gravel bed are just not worth watching.
There are some pretty models on here, but there are some that made me feel like they were the ones the site decided didn’t belong in one on one scenes. Does porn do that? A model maybe isn’t pretty enough so they put her in a scene doing something the prettier models wouldn’t do? This site is a lot like most of the others on this network. I liked maybe 1 out of every 10 scenes I watched. It also has that older porn feel to it like it was recorded in 2010. I’m assuming 2021’s porn is less aggressive due to social standards. This site doesn’t know that. I would call this site a fair site, not even quite a good one. At least it has the network to fall back on. |
|
02-26-21 06:04am
Replies (0)
|
Review
131
|
Interracial Pickups
(0)
66.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
There’s not really a way to describe this site other than most scenes are 2 black guys with 1 white woman.
195 scenes with downloadable videos and pictures.
There are 93 female models on this site. |
| Cons: |
They are not a threat to any of those out there trying to win a Pulitzer Prize. The stories are dull and last 1-2 minutes. It takes longer to read the scene description than it does to watch the story part of the scene.
Charging $4 per 4K scene makes me hope no one has ever bought one of those.
The site is either updating once every two months or it has stopped updating. The last update was December 2020. They would be due a new one right now if they were updating every two months like they had been in the past. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
This site is exactly why I didn’t know if I should join this network. The acting is poor, the writing/dialogue could be taken from a bathroom stall wall and there’s no creativity to be found. The one part the site itself has going for it is some of the models are very pretty. Most of the scenes turn into dual penetration, going more in the direction of the harder side of hardcore porn and I will make the blanket statement of when scenes go that hardcore they become dumber. Maybe because it requires more concentration for two guys to have vaginal and anal sex with the woman at the same time? It takes away any possibility of the guys doing or saying anything that might be interesting or arousing. The women are mostly over-acting in the scenes to give a feeling of being overwhelmed. If the women were amateurs then I could understand the possibility of being overwhelmed, but I have heard of most of these models by name.
When I first started watching porn on a regular basis, it would turn me away when I watched a scene where I could tell the woman was trying to make her combination of pain and pleasure easy to “see” by screaming out about how great it is and alternating with how much it hurts. That’s what these scenes remind me of, porn from about 7-10 years ago, but they are newer scenes.
The site has 195 videos and my membership is running out so I won’t know if they do update it. They had been updating this site every other month, but they are currently 5 days over 2 months since their last update. I don’t think it’s a big loss. Especially if they use the resources used here on one of their better sites. Besides the solo model sites they include in their network, I would rank this site at or near the very bottom of their sites. |
|
02-26-21 05:33am
Replies (0)
|
Review
132
|
Jason Sparks Live
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large, amateur gay site that comes with network
The Jason Sparks Live site has 425 scenes on it
Probably the most authentic gay site I have ever been a member of.
Scenes are filmed in houses or maybe hotels in specific cities and those cities are listed. Most are in the Southeastern United States.
Cute, well-built, college age guys and that goes into the authenticity that I believe a lot of gay sites are phony about.
Comes with Bareback Plus network. |
| Cons: |
Not a lot of appeal other than gay fans. As a straight female, I like gay porn, but I don’t know that anyone other than gay men would really be into these types of scenes.
I like gay solo scenes, but there’s not many if any on this site. |
| Bottom Line: |
I’m going to start out with a note about errors in the listing on The Best Porn/Porn Users. This site is shown as being part of The Carnal Plus network. It is not. I do believe they took their sites and split them up into two networks. Bareback Plus and Carnal Plus. This site now comes with Bareback Plus but is not included in Carnal Plus anymore.
Jason Sparks is a gay model and maybe producer. He only has 5 scenes on this site. The scenes are very standard. It does look like they rent a hotel room or house and based on the notes on the scenes, most of these locations are in the Southeastern United States. This does feel more authentic than maybe every gay site I have tried. I do prefer gay solo scenes, but since this came with the network I joined to get the FTM transgender sites, I thought I would check it out. I have heard of Jason Sparks.
The site is large with around 425 scenes. I paid extra for downloads on the Bareback Plus network. Those are not included unless you pay extra. I admit I don’t like the way the sites have been spread out over two networks, which would mean you would have to pay the download fee twice. It’s bad enough to split the sites up, but then to charge for downloads too and need two memberships plus two downloading charges.
The scenes remind of straight porn that is in the casting type niche. It’s usually in a hotel or small house. The action goes through the steps of porn. Oral, anal, cumshot. For a gay man they may be great. For me, it’s okay, it’s not doing anything that hasn’t been done many times before.
That is where the authentic part matters and I believe that is more important in gay porn than straight porn. These guys seem to really be into guys. It doesn’t mean they’re flamboyant or effeminate. Quite a few of them are very masculine and havr athletic bodies. There are some really good looking guys on here. I didn’t know I liked younger guys, but some of these are quite attractive. Seeing them not looking like they’re going through the motions and are really into the sex helps what is a standard setup to the scenes.
The real bonus for me is getting the Bareback Plus network with this site. It has three other gay sites and two FTM transgender or transsexual male sites. There isn’t a lot of variety in the scenes. There are some threesomes and that’s the limit on the variety.
The other gay sites included are:
Bound Twinks – 8 scenes, this is light bondage and always has the twink as the dom or top. I’m not really into twinks, but gay men know what this type of site has on it. A lot of scenes on all of their sites have the twink in the power or control position.
Twink Loads – 40 scenes, this is more defined even though the name doesn’t tell it. This is younger twinks that are topping older gay men referred to as daddies.
Raw Fuck Boys – 150+ scenes, is more standard. The cameraman even gets involved in some scenes. It’s very heavy on the sub/dom play. I think that increases the authenticity just from what the gay men I know have said.
The transgender, FTM scenes are on Jock Pussy and FTM Men, there are around 150 of those scenes.
It's quite a bit of content overall and it’s why I think the pay for downloads is a good choice. |
|
06-07-22 03:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
133
|
Jim Slip
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Advertised as compatible with Ipad, Iphone and Android
Lots of costumes, nylons and pantyhose
There are 750 videos and almost as many photosets
New videos every two weeks
Comes with 86 studios
Pornusers has a discounted price
Older/Younger theme
Many big name stars got started here |
| Cons: |
A lot of lesser quality videos as this site has been around for a long time
Better search options would help with this much content |
| Bottom Line: |
The site called Jim Slip has been online since 2003. Jim likes those younger women and his scenes with them have a great and deserved reputation for being classics. If there were a Porn Hall of Fame, his site would be in it. He deserves a lifetime achievement award for porn excellence and his wife should have one for her camerawork.
Even in his oldest scenes he comes across as an older British gentleman who treats his partners well, with classic old time dignity and respect. In his most recent scenes he has aged, but still comes across well. In some scenes he wears a business suit and seems to be very much an ordinary to upper class Brit. In each scene he interviews the models and he has a proper British accent. As someone who grew up in India, we find that exotic as well as sexy. He is a stark contrast with men I met in India, absolutely nothing like Indian men I have met. I can easily see a young lady being charmed by him and his demeanor. I wish I had met him back when I was much younger. Let me change that, the charm works for me now.
In the scenes, the women often go into costume, like for example, being a sexy nurse. They wear leather, short skirts, fishnets, boots, you name it. He has them dress up in pantyhose or nylons to add to a fetish theme. I loved the sexy look that for the most part focused on their legs and feet. The models are newbies or almost new to porn. He has UK pornstars as well as stars from the continent that made it big, like Gina Gerson and Amirah Adara. One thing I love about older/younger porn is that the models are not yet sure of what they like or want to do and he is like a sex teacher for them. In some older/younger sites the fantasy is ruined by the parings being close in age, but here they play up the age differences for all its worth.
Many of the scenes are remastered and they are labeled that way. At least that is being honest and admitting that the quality may not be like modern High Definition. The most recent scenes are not yet at the 4K level, but they are really sharp. The site layout is very modern because it is included in the Adult Prime network, which has videos from 86 studios, 17,500 videos and also a pretty good camsite. Pornusers has a good discount and that sweetens the deal. |
|
09-07-21 04:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
134
|
Kink Men
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Kink's gay network has plenty of content for straight women too.
Includes six sites - 30 Minutes of Torment, Bound Gods, Bound in Public, Butt Machine Boys, Men on Edge and Naked Kombat.
Mostly very masculine, muscular men.
Other gay sites are included, but are not listed including Yes Sir Boys, Bound and Gagged, Boynapped and My Dirtiest Fantasy.
High Kink production values. |
| Cons: |
Four of the listed sites are no longer updating.
Scenes can be very repetitive.
Very little masturbation |
| Bottom Line: |
I have a fetish for watching men masturbate. It's not one that is easily fulfilled. There is some masturbation here, but most of what they have here is similar to the straight Kink content.
Thirty Minutes of Torment is a man being bound, touched, whipped, spanked and put through 30 minutes of torment by another man. These scenes are okay. There's only so much believable safe pain before it starts to become uncomfortable to watch and this site, for me at least, pushes that limit.
Bound Gods is probably the best of the sites and it's a very large site that is still updating. While it's not much different from Thirty Minutes of Torment, there is less of a violent edge to it. It has nearly 600 scenes in its back catalog and there are varying themes which is also different than Thirty Minutes of Torment. You see the production values more on this site.
Bound in Public is a lot like their straight site Public Disgrace. You have a group of men dominating one man and while it says public, a lot of the scenes are not in public. It would appeal to those into male exhibitionism which I think is very rare. It's not a small site either at over 240 scenes, but it is no longer updating.
Butt Machine Boys is the closest the network comes to male masturbation and is the gay version of Fucking Machines. Men use the powered and motorized dildos on themselves while masturbating. I do like this content quite a bit as there is a common theme with all of these sites have muscular men on them. It only has around 150 scenes and isn't updating, but for those into male masturbation they might want to download all of the scenes.
Men on Edge is the most unique site of these. The scenes while not much different than the other sites on this network, bring in some story and there's more of a feeling of dominance which isn't easy to do with two males. This is another bigger site at over 300 scenes and it is still updating.
My feeling with this content is they tried to go for male/gay versions of their straight sites and the men just aren't flexible enough to perform the scenes the way the female performers do. Some of the content is very sexy, while some of it just makes me look away. There doesn't seem to be much of a middle ground.
They also have the gay site Naked Kombat that is their gay version of Ultimate Surrender. It has the same positives and negatives as the female version. Some of it looks planned/staged as the action seems to change at the same time in each scene. There are cringe-worthy moments like a guy having his dick in another man's butt and the guy falling back on his dick.
There are multiple other gay channels including the ones I listed in the pros. They have 7 other ones and a bisexual male site with male/male/female scenes. These look like licensed content from larger standalone sites.
The videos follow a Kink standard of the largest available resolution being 1280x720, their streaming player works well which is important for me on a network like this. It let's me scan through the scene to see if there's going to be parts I would be interested in.
With Kink's production values I think they could do better with the gay genre. I would like to see them take the bisexual niche and do something like a male masturbating with a female in a cell watching him and a male in another cell watching him. Whichever one orgasms first gets to have sex with him. I think that shows why I don't score this site higher. It just feels like they took the straight content and made it into gay content without really putting any thought into the scenes.
It's not bad and is one of the better gay sites I have been a member of. I would think it appeals to gay men more than straight women and it's good if that's your interest.
The score would be lower if not for the very attractive, athletic men they feature. |
|
11-12-19 01:38am
Replies (0)
|
Review
135
|
Kink.com
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My longtime favorite network of sites, but it HAD lost some of my interest.
New Kink produced scenes are getting better by the update.
Another massive site with 19,250 scenes
A lot of updates with a good portion being from other studios.
Remastering of old scenes to bring them into better resolutions.
Still one of the most creative sites and excellent production values.
The updates from other studios/sites have led me to join a few of those sites. |
| Cons: |
This one is going to be me knowing how the Kink community is, the new updates just feature a lot more emphasis on gay men. I like most gay men porn, but with Kink once being straight focused with the separate Kink Men site, it’s going to need to be mentioned as a potential con for some.
Most of my old favorite sites on here are no longer updating.
Mixing in scenes produced by other sites and studios does give some inconsistency. |
| Bottom Line: |
For close to 10 years, I have joined the different sites of Kink (before it became a network) and have many favorites. I let my yearly membership lapse when Covid cut into the updates and instead, opted to join Evil Angel for a year. This was my first month back on Kink in nearly 2 years.
The licensed content they are using from other studios is easily described as hit or miss. I have joined Wasteland after watching the scenes on Kink and do like it for its weirdness. The first thing I noticed was how many of the updates, including licensed ones, are gay men content. I join gay porn sites, but I do wonder if that will be a problem with those used to Kink being straight-focused. The number of updates is impressive even if it’s licensed. Just over the last two weeks (1-12-22), there have been 36 updates. Some of the licensed content is from sites I know and like, like Hot Legs and Feet, some is from sites I hadn’t heard of like Twisted Visual and Filthy Femdom, while some, like Wasteland, are sites I was familiar with, but hadn’t viewed much of their content. I wouldn’t have thought this was a good idea until I joined in December 2021. It, to me, has lost some of the Kink feel, but it also has become a site where you can get new Kink scenes and scenes from all these other sites you probably haven’t heard of or wouldn’t risk joining without seeing more of their content. The remasters of the old scenes is just icing on the cake.
If you just focus on the Kink produced updates there have been 10 over the last two weeks. That’s certainly not bad. That does include a few remasters. The one part I believe is missing in the newer Kink produced scenes is you don’t see the defined theme. Those are all labeled as Kink.com. Once you click the scene, you will see the names of the old sites like, “Everything Butt”. The newer scenes I have watched are taking a more hardcore approach and they have been able to retain some of their most popular models like Daisy Ducati. I see them going for content similar to Pure Taboo with a dark, gritty, story-based theme that carries from scene to scene. The current series is Torrential. These scenes are rough, possibly making Pure Taboo look a lot tamer than it did. I don’t see the scenes as being too rough, but some might.
One of the biggest complaints I remember about the older scenes was the video quality. At one time, the highest download option was 720p. I have read part of that was because how long the scenes are. The newest scene in the Torrential series is 58 minutes. But the newer scenes now come with the 480p, 720p and 1080p download options. The remastered scenes have 1080p added as well. I don’t see them going to 4K. The 58 minute 1080p Torrential scene is 4.1 GB.
That’s all about the newer content and how impressive it is. You still have full access to all the old sites and content as well. I will watch for a promo and may give it another try for a year. I believe the weirdness of sites like Wasteland would draw a big interest, especially from Sci-Fi fans. Their writer for their synopsis for each scene is funny and makes the scenes have a light-hearted feel to them. I’m not up at 99 like I was a few years ago, but that is partially because I have only been back long enough to really see what they’re doing with the newer and licensed content. I don’t see a reason to push people away from joining considering the amount of updates, even if 2/3 are licensed scenes. |
|
01-12-22 08:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
136
|
Kink.com
(0)
99.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The first non-mainstream sites I joined were Kink sites and they all come in one big package now.
They are showing 87 channels by my count and seem to be adding new ones every month, some seem to just be previews for mainstream sites (Spizoo, DDF).
Kink is highly consistent with their content and as great as some of it, it can be just as frustrating, that's the consistency. You won't see many "just okay" scenes. You will see a lot of great/wow scenes and a lot of that's just terrible scenes.
Over 13,500 scenes and they average 1 new scene per day. If you're a photo collector they have photos on some, others don't.
4,480 models, for me, it always surprises me to see a mainstream or glam type model on here, but there are a lot of them. Some seem to really enjoy working for Kink others look like they realized it's not for them.
I think overall they have the best production values, planning, screening, choices of models for each type of scene of any site or network. |
| Cons: |
It's a lot of porn to look through. I have had a year membership for 2 of the last 3 years and I am pretty sure there's content I still haven't seen.
The loss of passion or energy on some of the sites. I guess it's best that they stop updating those sites and just let them die off, but they've had a lot of good ideas they didn't seem to give time to develop. |
| Bottom Line: |
The only thing stopping me from rating this network a 100 is I don't like how they're adding content from other sites. I really like the DDF Network, but I don't see how their content, even if just a sampling, belongs on Kink and the same with Spizoo. It's like in some cases the best addition is subtraction.
Before the Kink Network was formed, I had been a member of these Kink sites as standalone sites: Hogtied, Device Bondage, Water Bondage, Sex and Submission multiple times, Public Disgrace, Divine Bitches multiple times, Wired Pussy, Electrosluts and Fucking Machines. I would have rated each of those between 88-95. Math was my worst subject, but I'm just that justifies the 99 score for the whole network.
Also a part of my high score is based on the value. I have joined a year membership twice at $79.95, that's a lot of sites and a lot of different, unique content to keep you occupied for a very cheap price. It makes me think of those commercials that say "for less than a daily cup of coffee" you can have 365 days of whipping, spanking, mechanized sex machines, women wrestling, and just a lot of sex.
It's an impossible task to cover this entire network in a review of 5,000 characters, but I do think the overall point can be made.
I never owned an external hard drive until I joined the Kink Network. I just used my computer's hard drive. There is still a feeling of a community at Kink. The comments on scenes are usually more interesting than anything on my social media accounts. Sometimes they are damning comments that show the aggressive side the content brings out, it's not uncommon to see comments like, "You let that bitch off easy" and there are other nicer comments like, "Beautiful model, excellent execution and production of the scene."
I think that is the whole selling point of Kink. When they get a scene right they really get it right. There are scenes here that make you believe Isis Love or Dragon Lily really convinced that hardcore, straight man to bend over and take a dildo up his butt just for the chance to get to be with her in the way he wants. They have scenes that are very good, but make you wonder what the point of them were (The Upper Floor, Everything Butt).
Some of the Sex and Submission scenes which I think it probably their most consistently good site, show that bondage, rough sex, can be done in a loving and caring way that ignites the carnal nature of both the male and female.
I found the sites with water torture to be some of the most intriguing and even exciting scenes I have seen from any niche. You see what you don't want to see and that's a near panic from the model and Kink's expertise in timing, understanding how long is safe and care for their models pulls them to safety at what seems like the last second.
I think their one site that goes "too far" is Fucking Machines. I can't imagine what some of those women feel like after what looks to be 5 or more orgasms and the machine is still going at top speed. You are going into the area of the limitations of the human body.
The Electro sites bring both a laugh and shake of the head. I remember using a Magic Wand once that sparked from a blown fuse, so I can only imagine what it's liked to have your clitoris constantly shocked and sparked.
That's where Kink does their best work. They seem to be genuinely concerned and set on protecting their models so they have a wild, exciting, maybe once in a lifetime experience with very little risk for injury. I think that type of content appeals to those that maybe are not just into porn for the sex. You are seeing humans reaching ecstasy and bliss without even reaching orgasm.
Public Disgrace offers what I think is the best exhibitionism experience. And in my review of it, I said and do believe, some of the indoor scenes are the best they have. The ones in locations where we as normal people can imagine us being like a movie store or bar. It's a situation we can relate to unlike any of us really having a bedroom of all white bedding, curtains blowing in the wind like many sites try these these days.
There's a realness to it even if it's extreme and that's the appeal. Maybe the extreme isn't that unrealistic and once your mind starts thinking that the fantasies and dreams start being formed.
If I had one request of them it would be more content like they have on Divine Bitches or even TS Seduction. These are situations/scenarios where we could possibly in our fantasies see them really happening and that causes our minds to decide what we would do in those situations. Most of the time, in our fantasies, we would do what we probably wouldn't in real life. I see porn as an avenue for generating thoughts and fantasies I normally would not have as it's hard to fantasize about something you've never thought about or done.
It is my choice of best network/site and I think my review shows why and shows how genuine I am in this high of a score. |
|
11-18-19 10:29pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
137
|
Ladies Fuck Gents
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Women using dildos on men in more of a dominant way or as a way to get him what he wants from her.
152 scenes make it look to be another site that’s recycling, the 2015 TBP review lists over 200 scenes. It’s still a rare niche.
Decent but inconsistent video quality, I guess these are maybe from DVDs?
Includes photo sets that are downloadable.
CCBill is the billing processor. |
| Cons: |
The same problem I had on another site from this network. The newer videos are lower resolution than the older videos and there seems to be videos missing based on past TBP counts.
Have noticed at least 3 scenes here that’s on another of their pegging sites.
Keeps logging me out and requiring my to login with a username and password they generated which is a mixture of letters of numbers that I have no way of remembering. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my preferred sub-niche of the pegging niche. Not all, but the majority of the scenes are based around the man wanting to touch or have sex with the much more attractive female model. She turns it into a dominant situation where she will let him touch her, have a little sex with her – if, he lets her use a dildo on his ass.
These scenes as a whole look newer than the other pegging scenes on this network. The female models are more attractive, and some may even be porn stars. It is still hampered by the lower video quality with many of the scenes, but there are more 720p scenes on this site than any of the network’s other pegging sites.
These “couples” don’t look like couples. It looks more like a man and woman on a date, he’s overwhelmed by how much more attractive she is than him and is even more surprised when they go in his house or her house. She teases a little then whips out the dildo. Kink’s Divine Bitches is the mistress of this niche. But the scenes here are pretty good. They are not long which is something I’ve noticed with this network. You will rarely see a video over 15 minutes.
These scenes almost all feature the woman eventually getting fully nude and “allowing” the man to give her oral and to touch or suck her boobs. I think if you’re into this niche it’s a very good alternative to Divine Bitches and is one of the better sites I’ve found on the Ferro Network. There is the recycling part, but the scenes are new to me. The photo sets are a good bonus. You have short videos that even in 720p are rarely over 300MB and my collection of women sticking dildos in men continues to grow! I don’t think the cons here would stop a person from joining it. The niche itself does that. Those into this niche will look over the cons. |
|
02-02-20 10:10am
Replies (0)
|
Review
138
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Highly recommended site for female viewers and males too.
Great video quality and photosets. Downloadable with no limits.
280 scenes with a new update each week.
Includes access to the excellent Pure CFNM network.
Newer scenes have the females being more involved. Is more like Jerk Off Encouragement now.
CCBill for easy billing and cancellation. |
| Cons: |
Older scenes were trying too hard to complete the Lady Voyeurs title with the females being in the distance or background.
Not for sure I agree with the females staying clothed. They do not in all scenes and the scenes with nude females are the best to me. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have been a member of Pure CFNM in the past. I thought the overall content of the network was excellent, but my favorite content was on the Pure CFNM site. Lady Voyeurs would seem like the perfect site for me. One of my favorite parts of porn is watching the man masturbate. That is what Lady Voyeurs is. I do not know if their producers limited how much the females could do, but it was rare to see a female even look more than interested in the nude male masturbating. The newer scenes have the females teasing the male, some even taking all their clothes off and touching themselves while they watch.
It is probably the most untapped market in porn. Even with the improvements to Lady Voyeurs they could make subtle changes to it to improve it. I even think they could let the female give the guy a few strokes to get him going and maybe even let her offer more if he performs well. It does not have to go into degradation or humiliation. I even prefer the word, encouragement. Like she so excited she cannot stop herself from wanting to see him cum.
The scenes are short and it makes me wonder if that is because some of the females are better at the teasing and showing more to the guy. I do not know how exciting or arousing it would be for a guy to know a woman in the dark was watching him masturbate compared to one in the light, taking her clothes off and asking for his cum. It seems like that would work better. I would estimate the average video is only 10-12 minutes. The women’s reaction to the cum is an arousal point. Those reactions seem very genuine.
The videos can be downloaded in a trailer, 480p, 720p and 1080p. I do not think trailers are very useful for this site since you have to watch the whole scene to see how involved the female becomes.
The network as a whole has 1,457 scenes and I would not be surprised if a fan of CFNM downloaded at least half of those scenes. I am scoring Lady Voyeurs for their noticeable improvement and believe the network itself is at least a 95. |
|
08-12-20 12:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
139
|
Ladyboy Glamour
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A very important site that I think people could learn from. It’s not that great of a porn site.
There are only 97 scenes and most of them are 10 years old. There is a use for these scenes.
A look behind the scenes with some of the scenes being called behind the scenes. Keep in mind, these are ladyboys.
Some of the scenes are solo masturbation my favorite in transsexual and ladyboy porn. Those are longer scenes.
The scenes seem to reach their highest download resolution at 720p. The scenes are clear enough to get the point of the scenes. There is an erotic side to these scenes.
The scenes show a less sexual side and more of the prettiness of the ladyboys. |
| Cons: |
It’s not porn except for the masturbation scenes. The good part is there are more masturbation scenes than the very short behind the scenes videos.
It's not updating. I don’t know that I would classify all these models as ladyboys. Since it’s called Ladyboy Glamour, I expected all Ladyboys. A few of these models look more like European or Spanish transsexuals. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is probably the last reason anyone would join this network unless they are into solo masturbation. There are some very good solo scenes on the site. One of my all-time favorites called, “Garden of Eden” featuring the model Lekila. That is a ladyboy that has implants that look as real as any implants I have seen.
This site serves a purpose of showing the ladyboys and transsexuals in a less than sexual way. Which is almost always how they are shown or portrayed. You can really pick up the feminine personalities. The feminine voices. You can tell they are like us other females, trying to look pretty. I believe that is important to the transsexual community. This does go into transgender. The only thing masculine about the models is their dick. The newer scenes on this site are more focused on the behind the scenes parts. It shows the models getting dressed, getting their makeup put on and being feminine. It’s interesting for me to watch as a female. I start to realize they’re more feminine, in a lot of ways, than I am. One of the ones is upset that her Chanel shirt doesn’t fit well and doesn’t do a good job of showing her natural hormone-produced boobs.
Once you add the masturbation scenes, for me, it’s a very good site. I believe it takes more guts for the ladyboys to masturbate. Their dicks are usually not very big. One even says her balls are longer than her dick. Most of these ladyboys look to be in the 2-4 inch range in length. They often do not reach a full arousal even if they cum. That is a reminder their hormones are not masculine. I find these models cute and pretty, feminine and overall, attractive. This shows them how very few sites ever will. If it was a site with female and male models. The getting to know and what goes on in the mind of, isn’t that interesting. These are models that are unlike the majority of models we see in porn. I don’t think I would call it educational. They are masturbating in most of the scenes. I would have liked to see more focus on photos even. There is butt plug play. Pierced bellybuttons, some of the best looking boobs you will see in transsexuals or ladyboys. I believe that is what the site is going for. It’s showing how feminine these models are. I think this is funny as a female. They’re not happy about their lipstick color. Or they want a cuter piercing for their tiny bellybutton. It’s such a unique site. I don’t think there is another site that shows transsexuals or ladyboys like this. It’s sad that they stopped updating years ago. I am looking at one as I type this. Her name is Mosiny. She has nearly perfect boobs. I believe those are implants, at most those are 32-34B maybe. Her thighs look like a female with her legs open. She has one of the smallest dicks I have ever seen. I’m not for sure she’s much over 2 inches even when aroused. She has her pubic hair nice and trimmed. She’s more interested in using a butt plug than playing with her dick.
I know it’s not for everyone. I do think everyone should watch one of these scenes. It’s not often you get to call porn today – unique. You can this site. |
|
02-08-22 06:12pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
140
|
Ladyboy Gold
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large network of ladyboys and some transsexuals. There are 11 sites included. Only 4-5 are listed here. This is promoted like it’s the hub for the network, but it’s a separate site from the others.
Nearly 850 scenes with one update per month on Ladyboy Gold.
Very pretty and cute ladyboys. There is a good blend of the traditional ladyboys, that are likely transgender and taking hormones. Combined with the ladyboys that have implants.
A lot of frotting in the newer scenes. It is a fetish I have and enjoy. Don’t ask, you don’t want to know. Look it up on Google.
A lot of scenes with 4K downloads.
Some of the scenes are very long, going into the 70 minute range even.
Nearly 3,000 downloadable photo sets. |
| Cons: |
It gets listed as a network and people may not realize this is a site in and of itself that includes other sites. I’m basing that on my knowledge of straight porn networks with a hub. This is the flagship site not the hub.
This site goes more into the standard sex scenes. The consistency from one scene to another can be way off. The length of the scenes varies from 12 minutes to 74 minutes. You also have the traditional ladyboys mixed in with the more transgender ladyboys. |
| Bottom Line: |
I do believe some of this content is used from their other sites and maybe some of the newer is licensed from other sites, but I don’t mind that. I don’t know of any other ladyboy sites other than ones that cost nearly $40 a month to join.
Most of the content on this site is a lot like the content on Ladyboys Fucked Bareback. There are a few of those scenes also listed on this site. This is more, in my opinion, entry-level ladyboy content. The scenes are mostly straightforward and some are very long. What I like about this site is it doesn’t just stick to one type of ladyboys. Some of these ladyboys are more like transgender. They are having hormone therapy. They don’t get implants and start to grow at least some natural boobs. There are the more traditional ladyboys that have implants and are not having hormone therapy. It gives you a good view of the niche.
I did list the photos as part of this site, but they’re really part of the entire network. You just can’t download them on the different sites. It’s on the bar at the top of your member’s area. You probably won’t download a video from one of their sites then leave the site to go see if there is a photo set. A lot of the scenes on their other sites do have matching photo sets. I don’t understand why they don’t put those on the scene. Their photos are pretty good. This network excels at something other transsexual and ladyboy sites fail at. It captures the ladyboy as a human. Not just as a sex object. I have known people that lived in Asian countries. They were aware of the ladyboys. I don’t know if porn has corrupted the view of ladyboys. This site has these long scenes that include the ladyboy playing around on the bed in her panties. Maybe teasing the male. You can see the feminine nature of these models. I really enjoy it. I think even most transsexuals and ladyboys would say it’s not for everyone.
This site has the nearly 3,000 downloadable photo sets and around 1,350 videos. The whole network has over 3,000 videos. It shows this is not the hub. It works as the hub. I am sure that the glut of all the straight networks has led us to see a network hub and think it doesn’t have any content on it other than what’s on the sites. It would be easy to miss these 1,350 videos.
The sites that are included are: LB Girlfriends, Ladyboy Obsession, Ladyboy Crush, Ladyboy Wank which is a favorite of mine, but it’s not listed, Ladyboy Angel, Ladyboy Dildo and the other four sites I reviewed separately. This is a huge network.
Ladyboy Wank is very clearly telling us what it’s about. It is just solo scenes. You will see some ladyboys on Ladyboy Gold that fall into that rare area of having a larger, but feminine frame. One of my favorites is Bipor. She is from Pattaya, 28 listed on the site. She has maybe colored contacts, crystal blue eyes and is 5’7” 120 with a 6 inch dick. She’s so feminine. You can tell she loves wearing stockings. That newer scene with her in it has a lot of frotting in it.
This site and the network as a whole is a very good join, especially if you haven’t been a member before or recently. I am pretty sure my last time as a member was in 2020. There are a lot of scenes I am downloading that I did not have. There is even cosplay. It has a little bit of everything. I would recommend it over probably any transsexual or ladyboy site especially to a person that’s new to this genre and niche. |
|
02-08-22 06:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
141
|
Ladyboy Gold
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An eleven site ladyboy network with I think broad appeal
Over 1,000 models
Over 3,000 videos and newer videos have 4K option
Over 3,000 photo sets with zip downloads
Very good navigation via model search, latest updates or categories. You can also search by site.
Scenes seem genuine, the “straight” males in the scenes seem surprised, but also don’t push the pretty ladyboys away. |
| Cons: |
Very little story other than whatever the specific site’s niche is.
Camerawork could be better at times. Showing someone’s face while they orgasm kind of ruins the point of showing whatever happened before the orgasm. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have always been intrigued by transsexuals and more specifically ladyboys. Being from India, I knew a few ladyboys and there was an unexplainable attraction to them.
Which was one disappointment for me. For some reason, I thought this network had a lot of scenes with ladyboys having sex with women, but it only has 10. It does have nearly 200 solo scenes which returns to my fetish of seeing “men” masturbating. I think that number might be low as I have seen several solo scenes not marked as solo.
I don’t consider myself close to an expert on ladyboys or transsexuals, but my understanding and my eyes tell me a ladyboy is usually of smaller frame, most look to be Asian and most look very feminine. That is why I think the ladyboy niche could have a broader appeal. I know a lot of straight guys would say they’re not interested, but some of these ladyboys might change your view.
From a professional view, I have studied about the men born with the XXY chromosome or the Klinefelter Syndrome. I think it would be interesting if these transsexual and ladyboy sites discussed that more. As some of these “men” are born more dispositioned to be females than males even if they have a dick.
That is what you see a lot of on Ladyboy Gold. A lot of these models would never pass as a male. The solo scenes give us a different perspective of a dick being masturbated since these models are more feminine, you see more hip movement, more what I would call sexual movements and I find it very attractive.
The network is large with over 3,000 videos and 3,000 photo sets. It goes back to 2007. They update 5 days a week and some, not all, of the updates have up to 4K video.
The sites you receive with the network are: Ladyboys Fucked Bareback, LB Girlfriends, Ladyboy Crush, TSRaw, Ladyboy Vice, Ladyboy Dildo, Ladyboy Obsession, Ladyboy Wank, Ladyboy Angel and Ladyboy Glamour with Ladyboy Gold being the hub and main site.
I am most impressed with the passion you see in these scenes. You won’t see models looking bored or just wanting the scene to end. They look like they are very much into the scenes. For the females into cumshots, it’s one of the best parts since the scenes with a male with the ladyboy both cum and I think it also could appeal to bi-curious women since you are going to see boobs, feminine bodies, but with a dick.
I do think it takes longer than a month with this network. I knew zero of these models and find myself a little overwhelmed at times. The scenes I found most interesting were the orgy/gangbangs. I was hoping to see more of those with women included. It would make you wonder if the male was going to get off more with the anal with the ladyboy or the vaginal with the woman. I have really enjoyed this network especially with the easy navigation and no ads. |
|
07-15-20 04:15am
Replies (1)
|
Review
142
|
Ladyboy Ladyboy
(0)
98.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The biggest and best Ladyboy site I have tried out.
An incredible 3,827 scenes and it's updating 3 times per week.
They have over 2,100 models and these all look to be Asian, but I could be wrong on a few.
Over 3,500 of those scenes are solo and that's why I call it the best for me.
The navigation makes it easy to get through this massive site.
I have found their in-house billing to be both responsive and fast in answering questions and canceling memberships. |
| Cons: |
The biggest con here is I feel like this site -- at least for me, nearly makes all other Ladyboy sites obsolete.
Second biggest con is most of the models do not have more than 1 scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am going to start this by saying anyone that likes having their beliefs around men/women challenged go to this site's model search and look up the model GOT. She does have 5 scenes which is a lot on this site and I really can't say I have ever seen a more attractive TS/LB than her. Which is the best part about this site. This site has the prettiest collection of Ladyboy models I have ever seen. I would say better than the last 5 Ladyboy sites I have been a member of combined. I do think there is a question about the attractiveness to a straight female like me. While I am sure I do not have any feelings of being a lesbian, I do like seeing pretty, nude women. I don't even think it's bi-curious. The opportunity has been there before and I didn't take it. I do believe the unveiling of a hard dick when combined with boobs and a pretty face makes me question if that would count as bisexual. I would be interested in how many straight men see these women dressed and need to see the hard dick before turning away their attention. The interest in alternative sex and arousal is high with me, just like I love the Kink network. This site is very close to being my favorite site. I was lucky a few months ago when I found Chaos Men, then last month I took the risk of joining BiEmpire and found my favorite bisexual site. I finally have found my favorite TS/LB site with Ladyboy-Ladyboy.
The numbers put perspective on the whole size of Ladyboy/TS popularity. Besides the 2,000+ models, they have nearly 4,000 scenes. These scenes come with pictures and screenshots, everything can be downloaded and I haven't run into any limits. I do think the price is a little high at $36.95, but I am going to let it expire then see if they have any multi-month deals that reduce the cost. My internet provider is not happy with me!
The scenes are nothing out of the ordinary. The models are. I do believe these models could be good examples for straight men to watch. They do seem to enjoy playing with their dicks more than straight men do, there's more eroticism to it, it doesn't look like they're trying to tear the thing off -- or are angry, or in a race.
The newer videos have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. I still haven't invested in a 4K monitor and am at the point, I don't think I will. The 720p and 1080p are very clear to me. The advanced search engine is useful on this site, but not as useful as it would be if the models were less attractive. I'm not for sure any of the details like dick size, hair length, even matter to me with these models. The beauty here is in watching what appears to be an attractive woman playing with her hard dick. The femininity of these models is very high and can be seen when they rub their nipples, slide their hands up and down their sides all before touching their dick and sometimes go back to touching other parts of their body even after starting their masturbation. It's highly erotic to me and that's what I was hoping to find in this niche. I would not only recommend it to TS/LB fans, but even to those with any curiosity towards TS. It is the best and biggest Ladyboy site I have been on. |
|
09-09-20 02:17am
Replies (0)
|
Review
143
|
Ladyboy Vice
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Asian transsexuals with a bondage twist and domination.
The scenes do a very good job of creating atmospheres typical of Thailand, closed in, small areas. There are handcuffs, leashes, chains. It’s a change I believe transsexual porn needs.
Download options could be better but at least they have downloads. I only am seeing 1080p and 480p.
A lot of pissing, especially the male into the ladyboy’s mouth. There are some with the ladyboy’s mouth stretched open with a device. I will have to explain later in the review.
Very cute and pretty ladyboys. That is the selling point to ladyboy porn, for me. A lot of these ladyboys are more feminine than the female models I see on American porn sites.
The tags seem accurate and are needed. |
| Cons: |
This site’s last update is listed as December 2021. I don’t know that is even true. I have been a member before, but do not remember Ladyboy Vice. I would remember this site as someone that likes the pissing fetish. They are not actively recycling old scenes. There have been no new updates in 2 months.
I’m being honest and trying to be helpful with this part. If you’re claustrophobic, some of the scenes could upset that. Some look like they are in a closet. It is filmed in Thailand. I know that’s a strange con or warning, but I felt closed in watching some of these scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
This has been one of my favorite Ladyboy networks for several years. I try to join it every year at least once. I do not have much experience with this specific site. I am not a pissing fetishist. But I like it. I know I would remember this if I saw it before. Transsexual and ladyboy doesn’t have a lot of difference. The main part as far as I know is Ladyboys are Asian. I do think goes into Transgender. These ladyboys do not look like they have any male DNA. They have a dick. Everything else is feminine. Their frames are tiny. You can tell these ladyboys like to dress up and be pretty and sexy. They wear hose, stockings, it’s just not the same feeling I get when I watch transsexual or shemale porn.
All of the transsexual types face a problem in porn. It doesn’t matter if you’re on the most expensive transsexual porn site. The scenes have zero creativity. You get solo and it’s a solo scene. You get scenes with men or women. It’s a sex scene. There’s hardly no story, no props, no build-up, no tension. A site like this, Ladyboy Vice, adds a very welcome element. There is bondage, chains, leashes, gags, handcuffs, the closed in rooms and the pissing. I don’t think I have seen many transsexuals or ladyboy sites with pissing. This is new ground to me.
There is clear uncomfortableness for some of the models. The males in these scenes look American or maybe German. Bigger built men. The ladyboys look on average to be maybe 5’1” 105 pounds. Some are bigger but is easy notice the size difference between the male and the ladyboy. I think that adds a lot to the bondage, chains parts.
The site is a good-sized site with around 260 scenes. Those can only be downloaded in an HD file or Mobile. It doesn’t tell the resolution. The ones I have downloaded are at a minimum of 720p. Those are the scenes showing as 2015. You at least get 720p. The newer ones are 1080p. That’s the only you get other than the mobile. Some of these scenes are large. There are no pictures. I don’t think that’s a surprise or letdown. It looks hard to enough to film in these tight rooms they are in.
I said this is my favorite style of transsexuals. The ladyboys, to me, really blur that gender line. It’s not as common for these models to have implants. They are taking hormones. They’re not big enough or have enough flesh to even have implants. It’s like watching the teen American sites. With the slim build. I find nearly all of these ladyboys very attractive. I do think you will be disappointed if you’re expecting large dicks from the ladyboys. Some have maybe average or above size.
I will end with the bondage parts are not that rough. It seems closer to playful. The pissing is very explicit. I do think the part that will bother people the most is the claustrophobic feeling of some of the scenes. Very good site. I like it a lot. It’s good to see at least someone doing something other than regular sex with the transsexual. |
|
02-08-22 06:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
144
|
Ladyboy.xxx
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly solo Ladyboy site.
Nearly 2,000 scenes with 3 updates per week.
Over 750 models, the models here are either all Asian or it's close to all, a few look possibly Indian (some consider Indians to be Asian).
Site navigates well and easy join/cancel system through the site's own biller.
Advanced search is the most comprehensive search I have seen on a TS site.
Currently includes 2 other previously standalone sites which I also am reviewing. See first con. |
| Cons: |
It's more expensive than advertised. It's listed as $29.95 on TBP and Porn Users, a few other sites list it as $20.99, but no matter where you go through, the price is $36.95. I do believe it has to do with them including two very good standalone sites (Ladyboy Ladyboy and Asian American Ladyboys).
I don't like the way the site is laid out. Upon signing in you are taken to what looks like a blog. It lists comments by the owners of the site. Updates. It's too much to read through to get to the content. They do have tabs to switch to models and updates. Which is what I am used to seeing when I sign in on a site.
I reviewed the main Grooby site last month and all 3 of these I am reviewing this month are also Grooby sites. I do not think they worry about the quality of each scene or even quality of models. I really like this site a lot better than the main Grooby site, but there are scenes here that just are not appealing. |
| Bottom Line: |
Last month, I was a little negative about the main Grooby site. The Grooby sites say they were the original TS sites online and I believe that. The amount of content is not only surprising, but the amount of sites they have is too. I feel like they own half of the entire TS online porn genre. I do think it brings up the quantity/quality debate. The scenes on Ladyboy.xxx are almost all solo. There are some scenes in the older episodes with a man with the Ladyboy, but I did join for the solo scenes. The advanced search brings a different quality to this site. You can select basic choices like "dick size", if you are looking for hardcore action, you can also select that in the advanced search, there are around 50 hardcore scenes total. You can even select Ladybody with female or Ladyboy with male in the advanced search.
There really isn't any story whatsoever in the scenes. Most of the videos are under 20 minutes and just feature a solo model masturbating until orgasm. The models on this site are better overall -- to me, than on the main Grooby site. This site goes into the attraction of boobs and hard dicks. I do think this genre is as aimed at women as men or anyone that's looking for something different the average porn scene offers. There is a downside to these cuter, even prettier Asian models, there's almost no dialogue. I believe it gives the scenes a clinical feel. Someone turns the camera on, the model starts masturbating with little to no noise, she orgasms, the camera turns off. Maybe that could be attributed to how long Grooby has been in business? They have been doing it so long it's easy and they just cruise through the scenes.
I would make a direct comparison of this site to watching the girls on Nubiles.net masturbate. There does seem to be some shyness, maybe even timid and you get some scenes that while realistic, make me feel like the model is a little uncomfortable.
The quality of the videos is as good as I have seen on TS sites. The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. They have photo sets for each scene that you can download in zips and they also have screenshots in zips you can download. It is very hard to fault their content. If I had a personal complaint it is a very subjective one that some of the models just aren't attractive. Is it possible that TS content maybe has a higher standard on looks than straight content? While I enjoy the TS solo sets it is because there aren't enough solo male masturbation sites. That would make it seem like I want to see masculine TS, but I don't. I want to see the most feminine looking TS. Other than that, when combining the excellent quality, easy and expansive navigation, this is a site I would recommend to any TS fan or even to straight women interested in watching a dick be masturbated. |
|
09-09-20 02:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
145
|
Ladyboys Fucked Bareback
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large ladyboy site that I’m not for sure if it’s updating, even though it shows a January 2022 update.
Good site for people to get their first experience with ladyboys.
There are 4K downloads available, but it’s why I have a red flag about the new updates. A few of those do not have 4K while the older updates do.
It almost makes me blush to say, the biggest dicks I have seen on ladyboys besides someone like Long Mint.
Fairly kinky scenes, no condoms, a lot of rimming and the males in the scenes are mostly attractive too.
There are 483 scenes on this site. It does show new updates. I haven’t been a member for two years. I can’t really go back to the downloads I have and see how much if any is recycled. |
| Cons: |
Just based on the name you’re not going to get much solo action which is my preference and you’re not going to get the ultra-rare ladyboys with a female.
The oldest scenes are from 2009 and those are very small resolution. I believe maybe 360p. The older scenes are not really worth the hassle. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a highly recommended site for males that are interested in transsexuals. The ladyboys, in my opinion, are an easier place to start. There is a more feminine side to the ladyboys. The one glaring problem I see is the implants are very noticeable. It looks kind of like most American porn sites. I do not mind as much. I would love to see these ladyboys in solo. Some of these ladyboys on this site are probably more in the range of 5-7 inches in dick length. There are much better erections than you see on a lot of ladyboy sites. I do not have the knowledge of how this all works in the porn industry. These ladyboys remind me more of slimmer, smaller framed transsexuals. I don’t believe they’re taking a lot of hormone therapy. I’m not for sure these ladyboys cross that transgender line like a lot of ladyboys do.
One of the scenes listed as a newer update has the model DeeDee in it. The model names on these sites are terrible to say the least. They do the same name with a number behind it like Patty 3, Emmy 4. I believe Long Mint, one of the best known ladyboys is on this site. She’s likely listed as Mint. It is a very large site with nearly 500 scenes. There’s nothing resembling a story or plot in these scenes. There’s not a lot of kinkiness other than the bareback part. You don’t see hardly any ladyboy topping the male on this site. That’s where the site’s age shows. It’s why some of the other sites I reviewed show a progression and some creativity. The best part about these scenes is looking at the pretty ladyboys with the big dicks. I hate to reduce myself to that, but it is the selling point of this site. I find it very arousing when the ladyboy is in reverse cowgirl and her hard dick is pointing straight up and not moving.
That is why I think this is a good place to start. It’s not going to require the viewer to enjoy anything other than seeing people aroused. Even with the risk of becoming repetitive and dull from scene to scene, the one part that saves it is the ladyboy. I have learned about size perception. I know that Long Mint herself has talked about she has a very large dick, but she’s also tiny. It makes her dick look even bigger than it really is. She showed her hand size, and it was more like a female’s hand. You see those scenes with her and you’re really looking at a small female’s hand around that erect dick. Long Mint is one of the few ladyboys I know of that has talked about her life and what it’s like. She even speaks fluent English.
There’s no reason for males to feel threatened by these little ladyboys looking like they’re packing 8-9 inches. It’s probably closer to 5-6 inches. These scenes are not as interesting as the newer scenes on their other sites. It’s very straightforward sex.
I checked the video quality of those newest updates. Those have 720p and 1080p. That’s the January and December updates. The updates before those two have an added 4K download option. I don’t believe I recognize these two newest updates. I like both of them. I believe I would remember. The one is with DeeDee, she is one of the ladyboys that is very capable of keeping an upward pointing erection during reverse cowgirl. She may be the best at it. She does have a very noticeable boob job. The other is Lee 3 who is one of the cuter ladyboys that surprising to me has no trouble getting and keeping an erection. She looks teeny, tiny in frame. Her legs are half the thickness of the male that’s with her. It’s her weight that makes her look so small. She is 5’5” according to site and 94 pounds.
I enjoy this site and have for years. It’s never changed much. It isn’t going to touch on many fetishes. It’s still a good place to see what you think of ladyboys. |
|
02-08-22 06:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
146
|
Lara's Playground
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Her husband’s site JimSlip is included.
Most, but not all, of the content is older/younger lesbian
Nylons, pantyhose and feet focus.
Lately updates at three times a month.
Currently has 253 scenes. |
| Cons: |
No PU discount.
The site layout is a bit dated. It does not look like newer sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
I share a few things in common with Lara Latex. We both love scenes with nylons and pantyhose. We also love showing feet and getting attention to our feet. I would call myself a reverse foot fetishist. Neither of us are barely legal or tiny. In fact she is my same height at 5’10”. She loves her girls and I love watching girls. She has many scenes with guys too and lately she mentions she has an escorting career. I love her enthusiasm and her pure enjoyment of her sexuality. I would say she is a great role model for women who enjoy sex and are assertive about it. She has pantyhose, garter belts, girdles, seamed stockings and high heels. Lara loves to use costumes in her scenes as well. Sometimes she plays a maid or a nurse. The one that gets me is her as a schoolgirl. That stretches my imagination as she is tall, about 40ish and rather large breasted. She loves shorter women and being the older female. In fact that is played up quite a bit and makes for many hot scenes. Most of her partner women are pros and are not as much fun to watch as she herself is. I was pleasantly surprised to see Destiny DeVille paired with Lara. She is Indian, born in Bombay (Mumbai) and there have never been many in porn. In repressed India porn is illegal and women have very few rights as well. I have not seen her in many years and I think she is retired.
In her heterosexual scenes with guys, they aren’t your usual porn guys, in fact mostly they look like fans of the site who got lucky.As an extra added value her husband has his own site, Jim Slip. His scenes are older/younger and for the most part entertaining.
I was able to find a discount for this site and it helps with an older site like this one.
Although much of the site is rather old, I would recommend this if you can find the discounted price. I think 87 is a fair rating. |
|
09-28-20 09:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
147
|
Le Wood
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Super site directed and operated by porn married couple Mark Wood and Francesca Lee
Though the range of niches is broad there isn't anything too shocking like if Mark was with a transsexual. There are transsexuals on the site, but I guess Mark is behind the camera.
Definitely seeing a progressive married couple at work. Both Mark and Francesca have sex scenes with other people and some threesomes together too.
There are 1,377 scenes, but that number is a little inflated by most scenes also having an accompanying behind the scenes video.
The update schedule is different than most sites. It looks like they do a monthly update for the first week of each month (5-7)
The scenes focus on around 50 DVD series they produce including Anal Newbies with 82 scenes. |
| Cons: |
There are some pretty rough and hardcore scenes on here. I was thinking it might be similar to Porn Fidelity. I don't mind most rough scenes, but a few of these were rougher than I like.
I would like a little more story in the scenes that feature both Mark and Francesca.
The mentioned Behind the Scenes videos that bump the video count up by at least 500. These are short 6-10 minute videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's no secret, I like porn that has some perversion to it. Telling me a husband and wife are filming porn together on their site and having sex with other people is perversion! Which is a problem this site has, but I wouldn't call it a con. Mark and Francesca seem to be such professionals they don't show any emotion other than lust when they see their spouse having sex with others. Mark does look to be the lucky guy. He stars in every Anal Newbies scene I have watched and thought the one with Harmony Wonder and Zoe Bloom were very good, but I am sure Francesca got some revenge after watching how much he was loving the anal with those two, little, young models.
I did bring up some of the scenes can be very rough. One of the newest is a good example. It is with Natalie Porkman, who is one of the skinniest, most innocent looking models I have seen. Mark and Francesca completely destroy her. I can see and understand the sex being rough, but there are parts where Francesca has both of Natalie's arms pulled straight back while Mark jabs her throat with his dick. There is a lot of spitting in the scene, on Natalie's face, in her mouth, that's just degrading to me.
I thought one of the best scenes was Mark with Nia Nacci in Anal Brat for White Cock. I think it's a good example of how rough, anal sex can be done without it being degrading. Both him and her seemed to love the scene. Makes you wonder if Francesca keeps a note on a notepad to go a little faster the next time she's with another guy! I think that would make an interesting series. Mark makes Francesca jealous, Francesca makes Mark jealous.
The site is big with those 1,377 scenes and while I did list the Behind the Scenes as a con, some of those are pretty interesting and aren't a complete waste. All 1,377 scenes can be downloaded (as long as you sign up for the download option $5 more for the first month) in 1080p, 720p, 540p, 480p and mobile resolutions. It's an interesting site that didn't quite live up to my expectations coming from the Teen Fidelity/Porn Fidelity sites also ran by a husband and wife. The roughness doesn't surprise me and I knew there would be some. I do think one of the funniest parts is Mark is in so many of the anal scenes. I can just imagine him saying to Francesca, "But this is a new series and I want it to be perfect!" There are a few other guys that get their chances in the anal scenes. Mark seems like a likeable guy so I would think that helps with him being that involved in the anal scenes. I would recommend it to those into hardcore, anal, even some roughness. |
|
09-08-20 11:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
148
|
Lesbian Sistas
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Darker-skinned lesbians that I believe include Latinas and possibly women from India.
While the site isn’t a large site with 78 videos, this is a niche I haven’t seen hardly anywhere. The action and quality make up for the smaller size.
All 78 scenes have a minimum of 1080p as the highest download option, 12 of the scenes have 4K.
Each scene has photo and screencap downloads.
The models are not only pretty, but I also don’t believe it’s that common to have a lesbian site with darker complexion models.
There is a thought most of these women really are lesbians or they are very good actresses. |
| Cons: |
There are no dates on the scenes and from what I’ve read the network no longer updates. These are still worth downloading.
There seems to be some technical problems with the site. The downloads for the picture zips comes up as potentially dangerous due to an unsecure connection. The videos take a while to load to stream too. |
| Bottom Line: |
I like lesbian porn especially when it is of women that are possibly real lesbians and not just actresses. These women are very pretty, nice bodies and some of the positions they get themselves turned into makes me think they have experience in being with another woman.
Most of the scenes are long (30 minutes plus) and cover showing both models in multiple positions to get all their best features in. The scene that led me to this site is two models I know are pros: Jenna Fox and Kira Noir. They are in an office and have a Sybian up on the desk. This is one of the best lesbian scenes I have seen. It is right at 40 minutes long and includes kissing, fingering, oral, anal play, sixty-nine, and they somehow still have the energy left to take turns riding the Sybian while the other touches and kisses them. It’s one of those scenes that can make a site. Which is the best part of the site, nearly all the scenes are at least close to as good as this one. I saw this one on a tube site and the link from it led me to join since it is one of the scenes with up to 4K.
I talk about this in another review from this network, they have little dots on the streaming scene’s timeline that tell you when the action changes. That one has Eating Pussy, Pussy Fingering, Sixty-Nine, Sybian easy to scan to spots in the scene. Those don’t show up on the downloaded version.
As much as I liked that scene, it ended up being only my 3rd or 4th favorite scene from the site. The one with Nicole Bexley and Priya Price is one of the “roughest” lesbian scenes I’ve seen and they are listed as a couple. That was my feeling when watching some of these scenes. There is a lot of chemistry and maybe even taking liberties, that I don’t know that a non-couple (in real life) would risk.
The other scene that made the membership worth the price features Sarah Banks and Jazzy Jamison. These are not names I recognize. The comfort-level between the women leads to most of my beliefs about a real relationship. There is pussy eating in this scene that I know real couples don’t even do. Deep licking, even nibbling with passionate kisses.
The site has 78 scenes, photos and screencaps with each and the downloads are unlimited according to the join page which invites new members to download their whole collection. I still don’t know enough about technology to understand the 60 frames per second tag, but most of the scenes on this site has it.
My favorite part of all the scenes on this site is the way they use foreplay in each of the scenes. A hand up the skirt rubbing over the panties is sexy to me. Especially when the rest of the clothes just start coming off naturally. It’s too bad the site isn’t updating anymore. This seems to be a underused niche in the lesbian genre. |
|
12-08-21 07:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
149
|
Lets Go Bi
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Bisexual men with a woman. It’s a niche that I like, but I do have believability problems with it.
Similar to believability problems with solo women sites.
There are 50 scenes. They update two times per month.
Video quality is very good, it goes up to 4K.
The site is easy to use and has 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads.
Some of the female models are very attractive. That goes into the believability for me. |
| Cons: |
You’re pushing my reality button when you put two young, handsome guys with a woman who is barely attractive.
If the bisexual part was not included, how attractive the woman is wouldn’t matter as much.
Some of this doesn’t make sense to me. There are guys wearing strapons. I know about men using bigger dildos as covers over their dick to please the wife more, but that is just different to me.
They have a few scenes that bring voyeurism in for the woman. I think that helps, but it’s only a few scenes that do that. |
| Bottom Line: |
I really didn’t know how I felt about this site. I like bisexual men sites. I have mental blocks that I have to get through. I will explain that. There is a porn series where a very beautiful woman is being pursued by a man. He finally reaches her, and she has a boyfriend. She tells him, if you want to fuck me, you have to fuck him (her boyfriend). I have heard of that being more common than we realize. I have to use that as a way for me to believe the two guys are not gay, but they are willing to go bisexual to get the beautiful woman. Some of the women on this site are the least attractive of the three. Which makes me think it is two gay men that are willing to add an unattractive women for pay.
The site is not real big at 50 scenes. It is updating twice per month. I mentioned the voyeur possibility with a site like this one. One of the scenes has a pretty, young woman in a spa tub watching her boyfriend and another man give each other oral sex in the sauna. That is another way the bisexual men scenes work for me. I still do not understand the one with the guy wearing a strapon. To make that one more confusing, the really pretty woman also has a strapon. The one position that I like least in bisexual men porn is also one I don’t like in 2 transsexuals with a woman. That is one guy up the other guy’s butt while the other guy is in the woman’s pussy. That’s too much movement. It makes me motion sick trying to watch that.
This site has some scenes I do like. There is one where one of the guys looks very young and he is topping the other guy. He is looking at the nude woman like he has never seen a nude woman. That could be another way to make me believe these men pass up the beautiful woman to slide in a hairy ass. The settings of these scenes are very nice. There are rolling hills, outdoors scenes. There are hotel bathrooms and maybe that is used to add some spontaneity. I think that would usually be the case. It just happened, we got lost in the moment.
The scenes could be longer. This is one that really need subtitles. Some are speaking English, but it’s not the best English I have heard. Mine isn’t either. I know that subtitles would help a lot. This is the struggle I have with bisexual men porn. Most of the guys in the scenes give me the feeling they are gay men. That is me being complicated. Or complicating the scene. The site is good and if you don’t complicate like I do, it’s even better. I do believe I would like it more if the females were younger. The scenes with younger females on the site are my favorites. It’s another step in the right direction. There is room for improvement in the way the scenes are produced, casted and directed. |
|
01-12-22 08:27am
Replies (0)
|
Review
150
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Young, cute and sexy lesbian action.
The site updates twice per month and currently has 502 scenes.
The models look to all be professionals or on their way to be professionals, there are 374 total.
Tagging system is useful, but could be more expansive.
Realistic action, but again, these are professional models. Will have a related con.
Video quality is excellent as are the photo sets. |
| Cons: |
Some of the scenes are a little too professional. You just lose any real belief or even suspended disbelief in the sincerity of the action.
No English subtitles, many of the sites through this company have English subtitles, it takes me back to the too professional feeling, the main form of communication is moaning and there’s not much story. |
| Bottom Line: |
One thing I don’t think anyone can complain about are the looks of the models. Nearly all 374 of these models are very attractive. The action is where you could complain. There’s no doubt the models are giving each other oral sex and kissing, but there is some doubt in maybe 30% of the scenes if we’re just watching professionals going through the motions. I expected a little more with these models being young, but it could be a European difference too.
The story, to me, is very important in lesbian scenes. I want to know if (even if fictional) it’s one’s first time being with a woman or if maybe one has a boyfriend at home, but wants to try a woman. Just give me something to work with.
The technical quality on the site is impressive, but it is important to know something I noticed. The site did not update between 12-18-2015 and 5-4-2018. That’s a 2.5 year gap in updates and I look at that from the technical quality side of it. While they have been producing 1080p since 2010, the 5 years before that are lower quality and 1080p in 2010 isn’t as sharp as 1080p from 2018. That is a note to make to yourself if technical quality is very important to you. The newer videos also have 4K downloads.
The picture sets are quite large with around 125 photos in each and are not screen captures from the videos. These can be downloaded in zip files. Also important if you’re interested in the photos is the newer photo sets are massive in file size (for a photo set). One I downloaded was 1.7GB for the picture set zip. The resolution is 4480x6720. If you like seeing every single inch of the model you can with these pictures.
I just feel like the content could be a little more exciting or even playful. Lesbian scenes don’t seem to have a gray area. Some of the scenes are worth downloading and watching multiple times, while other scenes (even with gorgeous models) are dull and redundant. It didn’t surprise me when I found scenes with still attractive, but not as attractive as the most attractive models on the site -- those scenes were the best. There’s that feeling that some of these models are just there for their looks. It’s still a good site with superior technical quality, especially over the last 3 years. |
|
08-09-21 03:09pm
Replies (0)
|
|
