Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I doubt I would join such a site.
|
12-23-08 03:24am
|
Reply
152
|
N/A
|
Reply of
sitsat's Poll
Fake Breast is a killer for me. I hate them. Especially the California Beach Porno Look. Too many fake breast sites that are hardcore on the Net for my taste.
|
12-22-08 05:32pm
|
Reply
153
|
N/A
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Poll
Aunt June. I was peeking at her stash. She had big tits and a huge hair patch. I was looking at her Hustlers she kept under her bed.
|
12-20-08 07:46am
|
Reply
154
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
Reply of
tobi's Review
Sorry but this site will take over your desk top and computer. A NIGHTMARE, from what I’ve been told from a Norton software professional, they said avoid. I’ve never been a victim but he told me a few nightmares. They will slam your computer and email. AVOID advice from a professional.
|
12-17-08 06:22pm
|
Reply
155
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
No Trail offered.
|
12-17-08 05:49pm
|
Reply
156
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I look forward to the new forums weekly.
|
12-17-08 09:51am
|
Reply
157
|
18 Closeup
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Not even close to IntheCrack in video quality, production quality, locations, xxx erotica, navigation, models, etc... Maybe in time but not right know.
|
12-17-08 09:46am
|
Reply
158
|
N/A
|
Reply of
sitsat's Poll
Excellent pole, every choice is an annoyance. But the clicking of the camera and movement kills me. Usually that means poor lighting and ankles and overall poor production. A guys JO voice is on the top of the list too. One other annoyance that is not on the list: dry vagina…no real visible arousal.
|
12-15-08 05:20am
|
Review
159
|
18 Closeup
(0)
69.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
•18 CloseUp is a niche site themed at CloseUp erotica of the female vagina and anus. The site keeps true to the fetish that their trying to offer to a niche market. It’s a newbie site and they need to keep working at it but they have the right theme and focus.
•HD for the very latest videos.
•Models are improving in xxx role |
Cons: |
•Much smaller site than what I expected. I should have known with just 30 models not to expect a big site. Members can pretty much download the site in a few evenings without a download manager. The HD files are small. I downloaded clips pretty fast. Don’t ask me speeds but it’s a minute to three per download.
•The site sold me on the preview menu and initial marketing. Plus the TBP Reviews. The site did a good job on fluffing the selling pitch rather well if they got me to join. I feel short changed.
•HD Video? The way they reviewed the videos on TBP you would have thought they had the very best in industries standards in HD technology.
TBP Reviewer’s compared them to IntheCrack? Not even close in video quality or level of erotica. A few HD but a majority was lesser quality. I thought their HD videos quality was not even close to what I’ve been seeing on other up-close sites that have been around for a long time. Even with the option of $29.95 HD membership. |
Bottom Line: |
•The Zip Files of the actual screen shoots are poor.
•Navigation? 2 out of 10 in the modern web site design. Area that needs direction as they grow to make the site much better.
•Weekly Updates. I wish the site would just update one model instead of updating clips of 4-5 models from sometime ago. With today standards for adult internet sites asking for one complete model a week is not that much to ask for?
•One lezzie set. Just one and its not even close to Sapphic Erotica quality.
•This con is one that drives me crazy. The camera person is a male ape with a retard IQ or a maybe a horny bull dyke bimbo getting off seeing pussy. If I had to hear those video cams click and unclick and the cam JO making a racket with that cam I was going to scream. Whatever the fuck the dummy camera JO was doing with constant movement distraction over and over in some of the clips I have no idea. This site needs to get a professional camera person if it wants to improve. The current cam people are terrible. They take away so much of the site.
•This is a con is for other sites too. Shaved Pussy? Shave it bald! More and more I’m seeing newbie models that just walked onto a porno set ( which this site seems to have for a first time shoot) that are not ready. Oh their horny whore sluts for sure wanting to spread their cunt and finger themselves! It’s becoming obvious the girls where hairy maybe before the shoot and shaved or they haven’t been working much and they let their cunts grow in. The shoot requires they shave their pussy. To my liking. Their cunt’s on the site looked just shaved all red and with razor burn. I’m fine with that! In fact I like it. The site wants the girls cunt shaved all around the ass and cunt opening for visual fetish which is what should be part of the production. My issue is the girls are spreading their ass and cunt but there is a lot of missed hair and razor stubble which is a total turn off. Is it too much to ask for a real bald cunt? Can’t anyone kneel down and spread an ass to see it the girl was totally ready? Their porno models fee usually consist of prepping the girl? Why sites can’t get this simple thing right will continue to amaze me. ALS is one of a few that get it right. Call them if you need instructions. Inspect the cunt please and make sure it’s clean shaved!
• More Lube! Not every girl is going to get naturally wet during a video. Viewers want to see wet cunt pure and simple. If the model is not getting wet help her out. Lube is cheap. Lube the cunt heavy. It makes for much more better erotica. |
|
12-12-08 06:11pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
160
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
thanks for quick response
|
12-12-08 01:44pm
|
Reply
161
|
18 Closeup
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
thanks yes it did help
|
12-10-08 03:28pm
|
Reply
162
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
please don't contact me again, nothing personal but I rather have it that way
|
12-10-08 03:26pm
|
Reply
163
|
18 Closeup
(0)
|
Reply of
arangon's Reply
Thanks I meant DIVX
|
12-10-08 09:09am
|
Reply
164
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Same here with your comment. I found the girls in other xxx sites. Why they don't get more XXX I don't understand. The girls are all ready doing XXX solo, lezzie and even girl/guy for other xxx sites. I thought of joining a few times. They must be marketing to soft-core porn users is all I could come to a conclusion
|
12-09-08 05:43pm
|
Reply
165
|
Silicone Free
(0)
|
Reply of
Jutti24's Review
Thank you for the review this was the type of site I've been looking for.
|
12-09-08 05:36pm
|
Reply
166
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Reply
Is it full access and download?
|
12-09-08 05:34pm
|
Comment
167
|
18 Closeup
(0)
|
|
12-09-08 05:28pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
168
|
18 Closeup
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Any new information you might like to share on this site?
|
12-09-08 03:50pm
|
Reply
169
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I don't see the point? I thought doing a review meant you joined the site. I will say I gave Incrediable PASS a score once and i never really had any personal experience with the site.
|
12-08-08 11:08am
|
Reply
170
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
chloebd's Comment
I totally disagree with your comments. Its obvious that you spent very little time viewing the site.
|
12-04-08 12:17pm
|
Rating
171
|
Teenrotica
(0)
79.0
|
No Review.
|
12-03-08 05:37pm
|
Reply
172
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I wanted to comment briefly. exotics4me says and describes the site perfectly. If I was going to do a review mine would be a carbon copy. A pro: they deliver as advertised watch the previews. Con: a single download for the zip pics would be nice.
Otherwise its a great company making great erotica.
|
12-03-08 05:15pm
|
Reply
173
|
Wifey's World
(0)
|
Reply of
Zack's Comment
BIG LOADS is an understatement. Wifey is a queen of loads for sure!
|
12-03-08 03:40pm
|
Reply
174
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
With all the troubles in the world a drink will suit me just fine!
|
12-03-08 03:00pm
|
Comment
175
|
Jay's POV
(0)
|
|
11-27-08 04:56pm
Replies (1)
|