| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
Before checking it for this poll, I thought that in general I was quite generous with ratings, because I have reviewed some really great sites too (Sweetsophiemoone, Hotlegsandfeet, etc.) But I have just realized that I've had my share of dissapointments too!
All in all, it looks like the average porn-searching experience recieves around 80 points (*/- 5), which is an interesting thing to know...
|
03-15-09 04:31am
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I would say "neutral": if the guy is just a common, normal guy, I don't even notice him; but what I really donīt like is seeing and fat old bald sweaty guy fuking a gorgeous young cute girl: thatīs a turn off for me.
|
02-29-08 03:33am
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I would say that the number of updates a week is important: for example, the site Eveangel.com had very few sets when it started, but then it was updated every day, so the archive grew really fast, and the money was really worth it in no time; in contrast, a lot of the new 21st Sextury sites are opened with very few sets, but they are only updated weekly, so you will have to wait for almost a year to be able to access a decent archive of sets.
|
02-28-08 01:18am
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
When I take the tour for a site, I look for some of my favorite models (Sophie Moone, Eve Angel, Eufrat, Nelly...); if they don't have any sets of these models, the site must look really, really good for me to join. Apart from that, I look for videos more than photos.
|
01-10-08 02:00am
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Getreal's Poll
I suppose "African" is an euphemism for "black" and "European" for "white", otherwise "American" should be in there too. In any case, my preferences are European-American, then Asian, then Latinas (which is not in the list).
|
12-25-07 10:58am
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I watch everything once, when I download it, to see if I'm happy with it and it's worth keeping it, but after that it may happen that I don't watch it in months, or at all, and finally I decide to delete it.
|
11-13-07 01:22am
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Poll
In general, I would say that solo girl sites are a risky option. The girl must be really involved in the site, otherwise it gets really boring after a while. What I value in a solo girl site is, apart from the quality of pictures and videos, the different options to interact with the girl: email, forum, chat, videochat... Those are the elements in my opinion that make a solo girl site worth its price.
|
11-11-07 10:38am
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Quite sincerely, I just use the pictures to know what I will find in the video (more or less): if I like the pictures, I download the video and forget about the pictures.
|
10-19-07 01:27am
|
Reply
84
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I can see how Denner got confused by this email. I would have probably made the same mistake. The idea of a membership that does not let you watch or download stuff sounds kind of strange. And calling it "trial rights" doesn't clarify much either, unless it comes with a little star and a note which specifies what are those rights.
I wouldn't call this a fraud, really, but I would say it's a very confusing offer. On a side note, I also don't like those big red ads on the 21st Sextury homepage that say that you can get access to the network "now for only 9.95$ a month". What they neglect to add is that this is the price that you get if you buy the annual membership OR if you stay as a loyal member for 4 months.
Anyway, it's obvious that we should always read everything carefully before clicking "accept". But it would probably also be a good idea for Sandstone to calm down before answering to a user's criticism, even if it as harsh as this one.
|
03-24-11 10:44am
|
Review
85
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Amazing quantity of content: +10.000 scenes right now.
-Good quality of content: well filmed, well lit, well performed...
-Gorgeus European models: Sophie Moone, Sandy, Eve Angel, Blue Angel and MANY more.
-Different niches: lesbian, BJ, feet, squirting, interracial...
-Videos are offered in streaming and for download, with different qualities.
-Newest videos are offered in HD; older videos may have lower definition.
-No daily download limit.
-New fun sections: interactive videos and live cams.
-Price is quite reasonable, specially with the PornUsers special discount.
-No regional pricing. |
| Cons: |
-Navigation is confusing: all the sites look exactly the same and somtimes is difficult to find your way around.
-Some links and taps do not seem to work (I haven't managed to use the filters in scene search, for instance)
-Scenes get repetitive after a while
-Some sites are no longer updating (e.g. BlueAngelLive) or are updated every now and then (e.g. SweetSophieMoone) |
| Bottom Line: |
This site/network is a classic for me: I keep coming back every now and then, since I discovered PixandVideo and ClubSandy ages ago. I am a recurring customer, so as you would imagine my comments will be generally positive.
First of all, this site is huge. No matter what kind of sex you are into, you will most probably find it here; no matter how fast you watch or download porn, you will never get to see all that there is to see here.
The second big asset of this site are the girls: mostly European girls, including some of our most beloved classics: Sophie Moone, Sandy, Eve Angel, Blue Angel... It is true that some of these girls do not work for 21Sextury as much as they used to (Eve Angel has her own official site with DDF now, and Blue Angel apparently has also decided to go in another direction with her career); but users will be happy to find dozens of scenes of these hot models, as well as hundreds of others less know but equally beautiful.
As for video quality, I think it is more than acceptable; in fact, the most recent videos are so HD that they may be as big as 700Mb. Older sets (which when they were filmed in 2002 looked to us crystal clear) may seem a bit grainy and are better watched in a smaller player.
As for the scenes themselves, they are very professionally made: they have lots of light, lots of colour (sometimes even a little too much if you ask me), girls always look awesome and both image and sound are impecable. My only complain (and "complain" may be too strong a word) is that after a while scenes get a little repetitive: same movements, same positions, same angles... Maybe it is not 21Sextury's fault: maybe there is just so many ways that you can perform sex in front of a camera...
Another great aspect about this site is its price, specially with the PornUsers special discount and with no annoying regional prices. The site also includes a separate "credit" system, which has to be bought separately and gives you access to the new "Live Cams" and "Interactive Sex" scenes.
The weakest aspect of this site is probably navigation: all sites have been morphed to have exactly the same look, the same structure and the same navigation tools, which could be fine, except that some of this tools don't work that well (scene filters, for instance, or some of the link tabs), and sometimes it is not easy to move from one site to another, or from one site to the main network page. In general, I miss the old days when ClubSandy or PixAndVideo had very recognizable looks, for instance...
In general, this network offers great quantity and quality for a good value. For me it has lost a little bit of its initial charm now that everthing looks too "uniform", but for new members it will be a very good investment. |
|
09-02-12 11:08am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
86
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
|
03-03-11 08:05am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
87
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Sandstone's Reply
Oooooooooh... :(
Just kidding, in fact I was a bit surprised to see that Anetta Keys was getting a solo site. I mean, she is hot, but I don't think there is demand for more solo sites in the network...
Thanks for checking it up.
|
02-02-11 08:35am
|
Comment
88
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
|
02-02-11 05:23am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
89
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Same here. I don't have so many problems with downloads, but it pisses me off to see sets that are anounced and never published (2 of the last 5 scenes in Sweet Sophie Moone don't exist, you can't get anything but the 'promo pic', no pictures, no videos, nothing).
I also experienced their lack of customer support when I sent them a web message explaining my problem with streaming videos on their website. I got the automatic message ("you will receive an answer in less than 24 hours") and then, nothing.
All this, and the lack of updates in other very promising websites (I am thinking mainly of Blue Angel Live) are making me reconsider my membership to 21sextury...
|
01-04-11 03:23am
|
Reply
90
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom22's Comment
Yes, I mentioned the same in a previous comment, and a thread was opened in the forums to discuss this issue. Apparently, we are a huge majority of users who prefer full body angles to close-ups of a pussy, a tit or an asshole, but directors don't seem to get it. With 21st Sextury, it's absolutely crazy: they have some stunning models, with gorgeus bodies and the cutest faces, and they insist on showing us 15 minute videos of their vagina. Come on, people, you can do better than that!
|
12-31-10 04:24am
|
Reply
91
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Just to clarify on Viv Thomas: I haven't been a member of his site for a long, long time because I find it too pricy; I usually watch (and wait eagerly for) his movies in Hotmovies.com. But he is, in my opinion, one of the best girl/girl-action directors.
I also find that DDF has less of a problem with close-ups: although they do include them, they also offer wider angles and more full body shots.
|
12-10-10 08:08am
|
Reply
92
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thanks, Denner, I didn't know that this was a common complaint, I assumed it was just me.
An example of a director that does not have this problem -and I think this explains at least partially his success- is Viv Thomas: his lesbian scenes are filmed with great taste, big angles and a special focus on the girls' faces while enjoying themselves.
|
12-10-10 07:53am
|
Reply
93
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Thanks for your reply, RustyJ. Yes, you are probable right, this cannot be said equally for all sites and sets. But my experience today with this specific set ("Bibi's solo show") was so excrusiatingly obvious that I had to speak up.
And it often happens to me that I see the "preview pictures" (with are more often than not full body shots) and I think: "I am going to LOVE this video". And then, the video is 2/3 of close-ups to a pussy that could belong to any model in any set of any website.
|
12-10-10 07:50am
|
Comment
94
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
|
12-10-10 04:49am
Replies (7)
|
Reply
95
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Ok, sorry, it was so long ago that I didn't remember it :)
|
11-16-10 08:46am
|
Reply
96
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I think there are two different questions here: whether we like BTS, and whether these scenes should be offered as updates, instead of regular sets.
Answering the first question, I normally don't care much for BTS videos, I only watch them if they include some of my absolute favorite models, such as Sophie Moone, Blue Angel or Eve Angel, because I enjoy watching them talk and behave "out of character", just like normal people. This being said, on rare ocassions I've found that the BTS was equally, or even more erotic than the original video :)
And regarding the second question, I hate it too. I think BTS, interviews and other bonus videos started being that, bonuses to the real stuff, and where therefore greatly appreciated; but lately, specially in solo sites, this bonus sets have replaced the real sets, making me (and other users, it appears) loath them with all my heart.
I think there's material for a poll here: "Do you enjoy watching BTS videos? Yes/no/meh" :DDD
|
11-16-10 07:21am
|
Reply
97
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LezFemmez's Comment
Yes, I agree that 21Sextury.com has some of the best g/g content available, but the problem is that some of those sites are not updated very regularly. For instance, Blue Angel Live has very few updates in the past few months. Anyway, I know that I will join this site again soon, probably sometime next year, to catch up with their new sets and scenes...
|
11-14-10 02:01am
|
Reply
98
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks a lot for that, Messmer. Aletta Ocean and Kathia Nobili are not particularly my type of model, so these new sites are not specially atractive for me. I've checked what they say are their "newest sites", and apart from those two, apparently they are "Nude Fight Club" y "Cheating Whore Wives". Meh.
In any case, I would say that 21st Sextury would do better to maintain in good shape the sites they already have, instead of trying to open new ones. But probably they want to attract new customers, as a commercial strategy...
|
10-24-10 06:43am
|
Reply
99
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
And have you been able to identify the two new sites added to your membership? :)
|
10-23-10 11:31am
|
Reply
100
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Well, it's funny that this network is able to dissapoint its members for absolutely opposite reasons :)
BTW, just in case an explanation is needed, there was no judgement intended when I talked about "disturbing or uninteresting" niches. Some things that I find erotic (for example, foot fetish or hypnofetish) may be "disturbing and uninteresting" for other people; it's just that sites like "Grandpas fuck teens", "Lusty grandmas" or "Bootyfull Babes" are, well, not exactly my cup of tea.
|
09-23-10 02:46pm
|
|
