| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
mistake62's Comment
I haven't been a member of this site myself, but felt the need to comment. In my opinion you really can't go wrong with this site as long as you are willing to shell out that high $35 price tag. Their videos are of a pretty good quality and they have an absolute ton of content. The newest trailor they have up is smokin hot, and most guys that have been seem to think the old stuff is even better.
|
04-18-08 11:55pm
|
Reply
202
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Bottom line, all of their online properties are currently being seriously outflanked by sites that are simply better.
Scoreland- Brazzers: more pics (although lower quality). Tons more hardcore.
Legsex- HotLegsandFeet
XLGirls- Tough call here but I think BBWpornpass is slightly better
18Eighteen- Take your pic: Abbywinters, Karups, clubseventeen. Hell you might simply do better to just get Brazzers for the TeensLikeitBig site or RealityKings for Pure18; although these sites don't have any soft core content.
40somethingmag- Allover30, Karupsolderwomen
NaughtyMag- Again, take your pic, from basically the same list as 18eighteen but slightly larger.
Ridiculous considering the Score Group has way more resources than any of these companies. I totally simpithize with why you rejoined 18eighteen though. All of their sites have VERY intriguing content. But you get the feeling that they spread themselves too thin to be able to fully capitalize on it.
That's All I will say on this topic, for now. Perhaps I should have started a thread in forum.
|
04-18-08 11:09am
|
Reply
203
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Comment
Probably the best site for the price, I agree. I would like to see them get some content from Extreme Associates from the 1990's. They revolutionized the gonzo market back then. Although they are a shell of their former selves after that lawsuit hit them.
|
04-18-08 10:33am
|
Reply
204
|
Kick Ass Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Did they give you any reason for removing all of their discounts?
|
04-18-08 10:27am
|
Reply
205
|
Spear My Pussy
(0)
|
Reply of
Nikolas's Reply
You would be wise to simply offer a site discount, that will get you some traffic from here.
|
04-18-08 10:23am
|
Reply
206
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
It appears to me that the Score Group is a Company that has failed to make the transition to the online format. As a result they are dangerously close to going the way of Playboy and Penthouse. Both aforementioned companies live off their past glory, and the latter I hear is tens of millions of dollars in debt.
In my opinion they (Score) ought to just scrap all their mags and focus solely on their internet sites. Right now they have a bunch sites that have always had potential, but that are simply mediocre at best (with the possible exception of Scoreland) .
|
04-17-08 09:29pm
|
Reply
207
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
The fact is that the Score Group is really a Big Boob/Pornstar company. This site has always had potential, but in my opinion has been a bit of an after thought for them. Their hearts just aren't that much into it, yet they know the teen market is extremely lucrative (if not saturated).
Also for a company whose claim to fame is their magazines, they really need to get their online pic game up to snuff. At least on the Scoreland (their flagship) site they have made some improvements here, but it is still not good enough when many online companies have sets 300-400 pics large. This is a magazine company by the way.
On the positive side, I don't know if you have noticed this before, but if you join this site through the PU link the price is only 19.99 (listed at 29.99) as are all of the Score Group sites.
|
04-16-08 09:17pm
|
Reply
208
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
I have already taken advantage, coming back to lock it in after a very brief absence. I plan on probably keeping sticking around permanently, yet another of the dozens of sites I should have reviewed already.
|
04-16-08 08:56pm
|
Reply
209
|
Chubby Loving
(0)
|
Reply of
sniffer's Comment
This looks like more of a review than a comment. I have been a member here before; does a fairly good job for what it is. Although, if you like such content (particularly the hardcore) I would refer you to sites like, BBWsuperstars, BBWpornpass, and perhaps all kinds of girls.
|
04-16-08 08:52pm
|
Reply
210
|
Kick Ass Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Pornjackker's Reply
I had already tried that link (Rabbitsreviews.com) prior to writing my original comment. IT DOES NOT WORK, UNFORTUNATELY. I have even tried two different computers, clearing the cache, etc. Looks like RabbitsReviews has simply forgot to take it off their discount list.
Makes no sense, the whole reason for offering discounts to review site users is that we are the kind of guys that shop around, for a good site at a good price. Does this network consider their product to better than Brazzers, Bang Bros, Reality Kings etc.. Other than the leg/foot content, I don't think so.
The site you referred to is offering Bang Bros. at $14.95 a month!!!
|
04-16-08 08:45pm
|
Comment
211
|
Kick Ass Pass
(0)
|
|
04-14-08 01:54pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
212
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I'm personally not a fan of sites like this simply because of what you point out. Too much airbrushing of an already gorgeous model. The content here is somewhat overly processed, but I understand that's what most guy's like.
I certainly cannot argue with the gargantuan amount of content that is available here though.
|
04-13-08 10:45am
|
Reply
213
|
Nextdoor Models
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
Your review is well thought out, but I would suggest bullet points to make it easier on the eyes to read.
Keep the paragraphs for the bottom line statement.
|
04-05-08 01:56am
|
Comment
214
|
Jerked Network
(0)
|
|
03-30-08 12:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
215
|
Cougars In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
I appreciate your reasoned response. Yes, I meant that NA has more content that CougarsinHeat (CIH). Also remember that in the comment I did agree with you that the content on CIH is slightly better (more and better pics, very slightly higher vid quality etc.). However I still don't think these differences are significant enough to justify the price. Remember this site charges MORE than NA does for a pretty massive network. The only way it could offset that imo was if it was bringing a particular niche to the table that is unique, or hard to find, but the premise of the site is pretty much the same as NA, many of the models are also the same.
I had no problem at all with your review though, as a standalone sight it more than holds it's own, and many of your points are justifiable.
|
03-19-08 11:28pm
|
Reply
216
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I think there absolutely is and probably most of the guys on this site are on the borderline (including me), oh well.
|
03-15-08 03:00am
|
Comment
217
|
Cougars In Heat
(0)
|
|
03-15-08 02:50am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
218
|
Leg Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
This price decrease seems to only work if you click on the TBP/Pu link, yet for some reason it is not listed as an offical discount here, not sure why.
Maybe they saw my favorable review and decided to cut us a break (lol).
|
03-13-08 10:48am
|
Reply
219
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Not to beat a dead horse, but you know what the funny thing is, the most recent poll running the the Brazzerspass site asks: Which possible site improvement would most influence you to keep your membership? Among the choices are, higher quality video (my choice), more sites (I'm like hell no enough already), and others.
Lo and behold boneheaded users of the site have chosen OVERWHELMINGLY that adding yet more sites would help to keep them a member. Mind you this a network with about 20 sites already, many of which have long since been abandoned, go figure.
|
03-12-08 12:53am
|
Reply
220
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I just checked out your review of Brazzers Pass, and I have to admit that you aren't completeley off the mark. For a site that robust both the picture and video content could be better. In comparison, Reality Kings has far superior pic quality, (not quite sure about the vids).
That said I would have given the site a higher rating than a 70, if for no other reason than the sheer volume of content (and most of it at least watchable). I myself am still a member, basically for the loyalty discount of 9.99 a month I can't see quitting. Too many hot pornstars, even if the content IS a bit repetitive and cliche.
|
03-09-08 04:55pm
|
Review
221
|
All Kinds Of Girls
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- AMATEUR Models (NO PORN STARS HERE), WITH AN EMPHASIS ON MATURE BBW'S
- Raunchy as hell, anal in virtually every scene.
- 100% exclusive
- Plenty of content.
- Pretty good video quality, especially for an amateur site.
- Good picture quality, (roughly 100 pics per set)excellent camera work.
- Wide variety of models in terms of ethnicity.
- very simple navigation (maybe too simple) |
| Cons: |
- AMATEUR Models(NO PORN STARS HERE) WITH AN EMPHASIS ON MATURE BBW'S
- Scenes are broken into three or more smaller clips about five minutes each.
- Most models have only one pic set (multiple videos)
- No zip sets
- Site lacks some personality (makes up for it in substance)
- No network access
- Could use a bit more foreplay, build up, and variety; we learn little about these gals.
- A few of the girls are too unattractive for even me to handle. |
| Bottom Line: |
To say that this site is not for everybody may be an understatement, there are are no porn stars or teens here. It's all about AMATEUR MATURE BBWS, and if you like these kinds of ladies this may be one of the best kept secrets on the internet. The girls here, while not the most attractive (in the conventional sense) are certainly sweet and enthusiastic. Most seem to be genuinely shy, and even somewhat surprised they were able to get onto a porn site. The content though is NO FRILLS HARDCORE, as few words are spoken (and not much oral is performed) before getting straight to the fucking. Anal seems to be damn near mandatory, and not much time is wasted before hitting the back door. Bottom line if you like these types of women this site is like hitting the proverbial nuke button a jerk session. For me, I am not always in the mood for this kind of porn, but when I am this site more than enough.
HOW DOES IT COMPARE TO SITES OF IT'S KIND:
Some may not agree with the high score, but part of my reasoning is that there really isn't another site that does this kind of content better. Sure there plenty of Euro sites the have the same focus, but the quality is a mixed bag and lets face it, it's Euro porn (language barrier). Also while there are plenty of "normal" bbw sites, NONE are as raunchy as this. (DirtyDirector.com may be a notable exception but the content is not quite same OR as good.) |
|
03-04-08 03:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
222
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
That is good news, this site is being done the right way. Thanks Rick
|
03-04-08 01:25pm
|
Comment
223
|
Leg Sex
(0)
|
|
03-04-08 06:47am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
224
|
Playful Coeds
(0)
|
Reply of
imagexxx's Reply
Would have to side with the webmaster here; I thing you are missing the point of the site. If you were looking for a site with a bunch of hot porn chicks, you probably should have gone elsewhere. When judging an amateur site you should usually base it on how it compares with it's peers or other amateur sites. The strength of a good amateur site should be that it provides access to a particular niche, or to girls that can't be found elewhere. When I had a look over PlayfulCoeds; I have to admit, I hadn't seen any of these girls elsewhere (and they looked alright for amateurs).And they are providing a particular voyeuristic niche that you aren't going to get elsewhere. As far as the video quality, that is fair game enough, while many amateur sites do not have the resources to provide the vid quality of high powered network sites, the vids should at least be passable. As far as that is concerned, looking at the trailers, the vid quality could be a bit better. It's not horrible for an amateur site, but I've seen better even from others.
At the same time these guys are only asking 14.95 a month with a full access trial. I thought you could have given them some more points for that. All in all I see the webmasters vision here and if the vids improve like he says it will, they may have a winner.
|
02-28-08 10:50am
|
Reply
225
|
Solo Butts
(0)
|
Reply of
porngoblin's Review
I think you are right about this site, even the trailers made me want to yawn. Real easy paycheck for the gals here. I would have rather seen them give a table dance, or on a pole or something.
|
02-26-08 11:34pm
|
