| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
126
|
Club Dorothy Black
(0)
|
|
02-14-08 03:25pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
127
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Me thinks Pinche protests too much! Haha! ;)
|
02-14-08 02:39pm
|
Reply
128
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
Hi Pinche, I never said you were gay. Even if you are, it's nothing to be ashamed of, so you shouldn't feel you have to deny it round here.
I'm only joking Pinche! ;)
Peace. :)
|
02-12-08 02:52pm
|
Reply
129
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Ace, STD means 'Sexually Transmitted Diseases'.
|
02-12-08 02:44pm
|
Reply
130
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
I think I might be a pervert, given that I love to see lesbians licking each other's pussies and aresholes, etc, etc.
In the true sense of the word 'perverted', I am perverted by images I have seen, so that something I would have 'naturally' found attractive is now kicked into second place by something that is 'unnatural' in the real sense. In other words, if it weren't for DVD/internet images, there's no way in my life I would be subject to such images in the natural world.
But by the same token, you could say most of modern life is 'unnatural' and that we're all 'perverted' in one way or another, not necessarily sexually. There's hardly anything 'natural' about modern life anymore anyway.
Do I feel guilty about my obsession (for that is what it is becoming)? Yes, definitely, because it is at odds with the accepted norms of the society I live in. It also surely has an affect on my relationship with my girlfriend (who does not even know I watch porn) as it surely influences my sexual behaviour. How could it not! And a large part of me suspects my life might be more fulfilled without porn, as I would fill my time in more meaningful ways. But I'm hooked, just as I am with cigarettes, so until I decide to bite the bullet and go cold turkey or whatever, I'll continue to watch it and get my 'fix'.
But the bottom line is - I know I'm still an decent honest guy who wouldn't harm a fly. There are so-called 'clean living' guys out there that would never watch porn but are nasty evil bastards. So on balance, I'm probably doing ok!
The fact that a person feels guilty at all, is actually a good sign in my opinion, not something to be denied - it means we have sensitivities, and worry about our actions and how we live our lives. A person devoid of guilt is a person that doesn't care for himself or others.
Yes, guilt can destroy a person if it is too deep or not dealt with - but it also guides us in a positive way - it's our conscience talking to us.
I'll shut up now! :)
|
02-12-08 02:39pm
|
Reply
131
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
Sounds horrible to me, Pinche. But that's my subjective opinion - I don't enjoy seeing naked guys and dicks and spunk in my porn. I just wanna see gorgeous sexy babes! Each to his own, as they say.
|
02-09-08 08:04am
|
Reply
132
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Poll
I voted 'who cares', but I really mean 'who cares as long as the girl looks gorgeous and sexy'.
One of the absolutely most sexy babes out there is Cameron (otherwise known as Lisa) who appears in many Viv Thomas productions. I think she might be retired now, which if that is the case is very sad, as she is just one of the most naturally sexy older (mid 30s) porn stars out there. And she has always had shorter than average hair. I don't think she'd look any better with long flowing hair.
And long flowing hair has the annoyance of easily blocking the camera's view when the girl is going down on another girl, unless it is tied back, of course.
|
02-09-08 07:58am
|
Reply
133
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Gotta say in response to that comment, Ace, if you think dying of some STD is a fair price for a fuck on a porn movie set, then it's probably just as well that, like most of us, you'll never get the opportunity!
|
02-07-08 10:41am
|
Reply
134
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I think it takes a special (shallow?) kind of guy to be able to do that. To perform under that kind of pressure for the camera, with all the crew watching, and stopping and starting every 2 minutes for various takes and angles. No matter how gorgeous the babe(s) is (are) I reckon I would just be too intimidated by that situation - the fluffers would be working overtime!
Nah, I voted 'I would never do that'. I suspect porn is a whole lot more fun to watch than actually make.
|
02-07-08 10:35am
|
Reply
135
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
I agree that cost should not be factored into the site's score. The main reason for this is, there are some truly awful sites out there that are a complete waste of time, but only cost literally 2 or 3 dollars to sign up to. If cost was a factor, you would have these bullshit sites getting higher scores than, say, Club Sandy, which is a fine site, but quite expensive.
I say: mention the price in the review by all means, but base the score purely on the quality/quantity of the content.
|
02-06-08 02:14pm
|
Reply
136
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
Not sure about your idea of 'political' porn, Pinche. Unless they finally released the CCTV video of Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinski in the oval office. (What was it Bill said during the investigation: "Yes, she sucked mah dick - but she did not - and I wanna make this clear - she did not swallow.")
No, I think it's more a case of producers making porn that they *assume* everyone is going to like, even though there is no research to back it up. True, we all have different tastes. I like lesbian and solo girl. Pinche, you like BG where the boy cums on the girl's body. We're all different. But there are a few standard things that the vast majority of us would not choose to see, regardless of general genre. And this poll indicates that the majority of us are not fond of spitting.
Big up to Porn Users for this latest poll. We need more polls like this to show the industry where they are doing things right - and where they are doing things wrong.
|
02-06-08 02:00pm
|
Reply
137
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Poll
The result so far (80% say either 'not my thing' or 'it's disgusting') proves how far removed porn producers are from the audiences. For me personally, it's a real turn-off. It's not only horrible to watch IMO, it's also usually pointless: why spit on a pussy just to lick it off, for example? And if the spit is just for lube, surely a good squirt of oil or cream or whatever is far far sexier!
I know it seems a bit prudish - but I hate to see spitting in the street, and by the same token, I don't want to see it in my porn either.
|
02-05-08 11:55am
|
Reply
138
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Poll
I have found the 10 minute limit a bit annoying on a couple of occasions. Admittedly, it's always been my own fault - missing a glaring spelling error, or writing something in the heat of the moment and regretting it half an hour later!
I think 10 minutes is just a little bit stingy, if I may be so bold! Half and hour would be nice.
(Yes, I'm still talking about the subject of post edits, in case you're wondering!)
|
02-04-08 03:58pm
|
Reply
139
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Could have done with an option for "I would prefer to see the face if she's not bad, but if she's ugly then yes, please keep it hidden, and still film her as long as she's a dirty little minx. But if she's neither pretty or dirty, then she's in the wrong job".
Just got to work out how to put that into a few words...
|
01-31-08 11:40am
|
Reply
140
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
I just have one folder for each website that I've been a member of - modified to display the logo of the site (obtained by googling images of the website).
Then within each folder I have 2 sub-folders: 'Movies' and 'Pics'. And that's about it.
At one time I started to build up a separate folder of shortcuts by model name - but then I realised it was taking up a lot of my time, and was somewhat sad! So I deleted it and now if I want to find a particular model's movies, I just perform a quick search.
All my movies are named by model name plus an indication of the sourced site, e.g. Peaches-Zafira-SE.wmv (where 'SE' stands for Sapphic Erotica). That way if I make copies of the movies to store elsewhere, I can see instantly where they came from (without having to click each movie to see the on-screen watermark). I name my picture set folders in the same way. Solo girl movies/sets consist of model name plus site's description, e.g. Bridgett-mellow fruits-CS.avi (where 'CS' refers to Club Sandy).
|
01-29-08 01:50pm
|
Reply
141
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I think Pinche Kankun needs to take his pills and lie down.
Anyhoo, I reckon this poll is pretty evenly split. But forget all this deep-throat shit. And as for watching some stubbly-faced bloke licking pussy, that's an even bigger turn-off. I just don't get why any hetro guy wants to see naked guys in porn!
I wonder how split this poll would be if the question were: 'Do you like to see a girl deep-tongue another girl's pussy and ass'.
Now, that would be a no-brainer.
|
01-27-08 04:25pm
|
Reply
142
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I answered 'No', but I suppose I'm biased in that I don't get turned on much by porn with cocks in it. I do understand the appeal of seeing a sexy girl give a BJ to a guy, but for me, it doesn't matter how hot the porn is with a girl and a guy - it's always ten times hotter to me if it's a girl and a GIRL!
Each to his own though, as they say. :)
|
01-22-08 03:47pm
|
Reply
143
|
Tushy Lickers
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
Most welcome indeed. Maybe you'll join and give your own review. You may find other aspects worthy of comment that I didn't, or just offer an alternative viewpoint (which is what user reviews are all about).
Regards.
|
01-21-08 02:34pm
|
Reply
144
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Interesting. In a way - looking at it from a business point of view - you can't blame sites for doing that. They've realised that there's a lot of business in the 'one month only' customers who never return. So it's probably cheaper to just recycle and rely on those one-monther customers coming along.
What large sites should do is offer a choice of deals. The more you pay, the further back into the archive you can access. Different passwords could give different levels of access. That way, if you want to join again after being away for, say, 8 weeks, you could buy an 8 week deal - just get the last 8 weeks of archive - and the next 30 days of updates. This would be better value for the customer because he only needs the last 2 months updates. But for the webmaster it would mean he might come back more often, so it's good business sense. Large sites could offer 4 week, 8 week, 16 week, 6 month, 12 months, whatever deals, up to the entire history of the archive at the top price.
Wonder if any site has considered this? I've been away from Club Sandy for about 3 months - I'd love to visit again, but I don't want to pay full price just to get the last 3 months of updates. I'll probably wait at least a year, and shop elsewhere in the meantime.
|
01-21-08 02:22pm
|
Reply
145
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Agreed about Club Sandy. But Pix And Video, whilst having excellently produced movies and tons of content just like CS, does have lower resolution than any other 21 Sextury site I've visited (e.g. Dirty 101, Lezbo Honeys, etc.). I'm not sure where the duplicate movies appear first - Pix & Vids or other 21 Sextury sites - but all the ones I saw were lower res on P&V.
Still, these are still in a small minority, so I don't see it as a major issue - just a disappointment as there should be no need for this at all.
|
01-21-08 02:09pm
|
Reply
146
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
hondaclf's Review
Hi Hondaclf
Just had to pick you up one of your comments: 'this site has something for everyone'. But nowhere in your review did you mention that this site is very softcore, from other reviews I've read (not visited yet myself). I've read it concentrates much more on gentleness, and girls prancing about in the nude, rather than real hard cunnilingus and analingus and girl on girl fucking.
Can you confirm if this is the case - or has it moved into harder territory lately?
Regards
Davit
|
01-20-08 12:47pm
|
Reply
147
|
Tushy Lickers
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
Hi Robare
OK, I'll try and answer your questions mate.
Firstly, yeah, *generally speaking* the updates come in pairs of updates for couples (each the reverse role of the other in terms of recipient) or if it's a threeway then there tends to be 3 updates, where each girl has her turn at being the recipient of the other two. They tend to be not very long - although there are some that go up as long as 11 minutes, but these are in the minority. The shortest one I have is 2mins 11 secs, again in the minority. I'll amend my average to maybe 8 minutes (but that's a best guess - don't expect me to go through my entire collection and work out the exact average, please, I don't want to get pedantic).
Bitrate seems to be mainly 521kbps/320x240. There are also a handful (on my hard drive at least) that are twice this (1060kbps/640x480). This surprised me when I checked this just now, so I played a couple to get a fresh idea of how they look, compared to the many other vids I have. And, very importantly, they *look* much lower res than the stats would suggest. One possible reason is that they've come from a lo-res source - or possibly that the conversion software is substandard. This, of course, is pure conjecture, I can only speak objectively about how they physically look when played. And they do look quite low res and grainy - although, as I said in my review - still watchable.
Your final question about orgasms - in all honesty, I'm not convinced that most of the orgasms portrayed here are genuine. As with most sites, there's little or no evidence of real white 'girl goo' to be seen (the only definitive proof of female orgasm really). But at the same time, the girls don't 'overact' and do seem to be really having a great time together, and most of the climaxes - whether real or not - are the result of anal stimulation principally, and sometimes, but not always, aided by vaginal stimulation simultaneously. The emphasis is definitely on tongue to ass. And the camera is good at getting that shot - after all, it's the whole point of the site.
Hope this helps, but if you have any more questions, or if I have been unclear, please ask away!
Regards
Davit
|
01-20-08 12:19pm
|
Reply
148
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
PosterDude's Reply
PosterDude, I don't think TBP take back handers from any porn company to give good reviews. But the bottom line is: don't trust those reviews, or any other professional review site's reviews. Only pay attention to independent user reviews. At least that's my motto.
Professional reviews nearly always seem to be in the late 80s and upwards. They're just not truly reflective of the reality out there. Some sites barely merit more than 10/100. And these review sites often review many dozens of pay sites, so I'm suspicious that they have either the time or money to do this properly.
I reckon a good proportion of professional reviews out there are based solely on the free tours! So no wonder they're artificially high!
Not saying that's the case with TBP, but is just a general suspicion of mine.
Regards.
|
01-20-08 10:50am
|
Review
149
|
Tushy Lickers
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-95% of videos are about girls licking each other's assholes. So it does what it says on the tin.
-Lots of content - I downloaded 140 movies in a month
-Movies are well produced, well shot, well filmed, well lit (in the main)
-Most of the girls are very hot and very sexy |
| Cons: |
-Movies are generally very short - around 8 minutes on average I would guess.
-Movie quality is very low by today's standards. They're still watchable - but are probably half the quality of, say, 21 Sextury movies (which are not very hi res in the first place).
-Generally, movies come in pairs; in the first movie girl 'A' will pleasure girl 'B', then in the next movie visa versa. It would be more natural to have a single longer movie for each coupling (or threeway) where they pleasure each other within the same movie.
-Navigation and design is very basic and uninspired |
| Bottom Line: |
Bottom line - now there's an apt phrase for a review of this site. I can honestly say for all it's faults, I have never regretted shelling out the month's fee to access this site's movie booty (oops, there goes another pun).
I'm a self-confessed lover of lesbian anilingus. I just adore it. So it was inevitable that I would find this site alluring. Yes, Tushy Lickers would be so much better if it had better movie quality, zipped pic sets, and classier navigation. It has none of these.
But what it does offer, is a single-minded dedication to the lesbian analingus niche that no other site yet does (as far as I'm aware). It does stray occasionally into B/G scenarios (maybe 5% of movies), which may please some viewers (although I honestly cannot understand how, unless the viewer is bisexual).
Underneath the lo-res presentation of the movies can still clearly be seen high quality original productions, that would be perfectly at home on any lesbian DVD. Yes, I emphasise, the production quality is let down only at the very last stage of file conversion. If these were to be remastered, they could be lesbian classics.
'Ifs' and 'butts'
If lesbianism - or analingus - is not your bag, then the 'cons' will make this site not worth your time or money. But if this kind of action is paradise to you, then this site will give you a small taste of heaven. |
|
01-20-08 10:09am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
150
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
Reply of
studslut's Review
I don't get this review. You made this site out to be pretty horrible with fat, ugly, hairy women, and infrequent updates (although given your description of the site, I would regard that as a small mercy!) and yet you awarded it a massive 90 score! It doesn't add up!
|
01-20-08 09:26am
|
|
