| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
401
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
|
06-11-09 08:23pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
402
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Here's the obvious moronic Wittyguy answer: We need more "quality" of everything damn it!!! Most everything coming out is mediocre at best in terms of quality, at this point I'm willing to take quality anything over the usual suspects.
|
06-11-09 01:38pm
|
Reply
403
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
If you don't get a decent answer here shortly (I don't know what's causing your problem), I'd say go and post your issue in the forum as more eyes will probably pick up on it there.
|
06-08-09 01:27pm
|
Reply
404
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Definitely other. Who wouldn't want the "Sham Wow Guy" position ... cleaning up the furniture and props afterwards. My dream job.
|
06-08-09 10:55am
|
Reply
405
|
Euro Teen Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Balibalo's Comment
Good to know. The did a similar site about 18 months ago (all teen content amassed from other DDF sites) and that didn't seem to last too long. Don't know why they got the sudden desire to get back into the same situation unless there's some untapped market they're thinking they might reach. However, I think they're just going to cheese off more DDF fans than get new subscribers unless the price is a lot lower than their usual $30+ a month.
|
06-05-09 05:29pm
|
Comment
406
|
Mobile Teens Like It Big
(0)
|
|
06-04-09 10:50pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
407
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I voted "other" because Khan just isn't getting enough face time on "The View" or in "People" magazine. I'm eagerly awaiting 'Khan Tweets' so we can find out about his exciting life ... "just nuked another dumbsh*t post"; "just approved Mbaya's 25th review of week"; "feel asleep reading the crap in the forum" ....
|
06-03-09 12:09pm
|
Reply
408
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
largeun's Review
Entertaining review. Thanks.
|
06-02-09 04:15pm
|
Reply
409
|
Pinky Lounge
(0)
|
Reply of
peterhd's Review
Hi Peterhd and welcome to PU. Just wanted to let you that you're going to catch some flak for giving a site a perfect 100 rating when they don't even update any more. As a basic pointer, reviews generally have specifics like the number of sets available, types of vids available, restrictions on downloadable content and stuff of that nature along with opinions. As your review currently stands, its mostly about personal preferences. As such, your review is more along the lines of a comment than a review but to each their own. You're going to have to provide a lot more information about why this site should be considered a "100" in order for your review to be taken seriously by people who visit PU.
|
06-02-09 04:06pm
|
Reply
410
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
In order to settle the issue once and for we need to establish a base line for "taste". And the only way we're going to settle that issue is to have people sign up for the Wittyguy School of Advanced Muff-Diving. Please note that all participants must have passed muff diving 101 before enrollment and have their own super snorkel or be able to breathe out their ass (inhale, not exhale like all guys already do extremely well). For the amazingly low price of $39.95 (cash only please) you'll learn all my advanced secrets for Dining at the Y.
Can't distinguish premium beaver from muskox? Then you need this on-line computer course or else my name is Billy Mays! Once you've completed these advanced learning techniques (so secret that I had to pay a streetwalking Kama Sutra master a six pack of 40 oz. malt liquers to learn them), dining delicacy reviews will be posted on the school's website and the scientific community will be able to answer the putrid poon question once and for all. Don't be late, courses are filling up now. With my elusive money back guarantee you've got nothing to lose but the further deprivation of 'men-kinds' good taste. Act today and you'll get a FREE COPY of Dora the Explorer's video: Find the Man in the Boat!
|
06-01-09 01:35pm
|
Reply
411
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Is Drooler asking this because he knows or doesn't know, enquiring minds want to know ;)
|
06-01-09 10:41am
|
Reply
412
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
nunya's Review
Let me try here. Videobox is one of the top scoring sites here and on almost every other mainstream review site. They have a ton of content, good navigation and decent quality. True, they're starting to tweak people with their premium channel stuff but it's still miles ahead of most other sites except when it comes to exclusivity.
With a score of 70 it sounds to me like you just didn't like the content. While that's perfectly fine, that shouldn't necessarily drive the score down to a 70. At that point, you're letting personal preferences dictate your review score, not the attributes of the site itself in comparison to similar porn sites. Obviously you're entitled to your opinion but I don't think many others would agree with you.
|
05-29-09 06:49pm
|
Reply
413
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
For me, it's mostly news, sudoku (I'm addicted) and a few odds and ends. Of course, PU tops the list ;) My favorite site for laughs on a daily basis is http://icanhascheezburger.com/ which is network of sites featuring viewer submitted pics (animals, celebs, news, stupid stuff) that have funny captions; always makes me laugh and it's clean enough to view at work/in public.
|
05-29-09 02:53pm
|
Comment
414
|
Glossy Angels
(0)
|
|
05-29-09 01:03pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
415
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I agree that 4000 pixel images are a bit over the top today but generally the stuff we collect we intend to keep for a long time so you have to look beyond today. It's already possible to hook up monitor feeds to tvs and as technology moves along our tv will also become a major feed for porn. Who the heck would want a 900x600 image on a 48" HD tv screen? So, while huge pics maybe overboard today, you may thank yourself for having big ass pics (or movies) in the future.
|
05-29-09 11:59am
|
Reply
416
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
This is one of those polls that is "loaded" in that it appeals to what you really want the most: pics, vids, or new content. I'll jump on the Drooler wagon and bitch about pics because I like them the most and they're probably the easiest for sites to fix.
Everyone shoots digitally today and no one uses cell phones to do professional shoots so were talking about pic sizes that well above 4 megapixels in size. But what do sites do? They think the pics are too big (apparently we can't handle the truth) so they shrink them down to 900x600 and call it good. NOT! A 2000 pixel image isn't going to take more than a second or two longer to download than a smaller one. The file size is virtually nothing compared to video sizes. This is an easy way to draw more customers (albeit a minority as most people dig vids more) with virtually no expense and effort other than changing the pixel sizes. Instead they're either just living in the past and think a 13" monitor is all anyone has or they're just lazy.
|
05-28-09 12:25pm
|
Reply
417
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
They obviously sell otherwise they wouldn't make as many as they do. For me, it's just an occasionally interesting gimmick since the acting is never very good and the plot is in the sex, not the story.
|
05-26-09 11:26am
|
Reply
418
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Of course we're all holding our breath ... when's the last time you smelled nasty dog drool breath ;)
|
05-22-09 02:10pm
|
Reply
419
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It seems to me that having this kind of system would get pretty tedious and not so funny after a while. "Angelina Crowe Sex with Nasty Dick Cheney Faced Thong Dude" would be too long of a title and lose it's punch after a while. Boredom for the masses I say.
|
05-22-09 11:58am
|
Reply
420
|
Fully Clothed Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
Hey man, thanks for the update here. I definitely liked the site but haven't been back in years. Maybe I'll get back there later this year. Thanks for the technical specs too (sorry if I was giving you a hard time in the forum about that stuff).
|
05-21-09 12:22pm
|
Reply
421
|
Party Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
Congrats on hitting the 100 point mark with this review.
|
05-20-09 01:40pm
|
Reply
422
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
When you start getting too many bodies in the scene it just gets to be too much, especially if you mostly collect pictures like me. Also, in the multiple partner sets the girl(s) becomes nothing more than a sex object. So, I like BG mostly.
|
05-20-09 12:08pm
|
Comment
423
|
iPink Visual Pass
(0)
|
|
05-15-09 12:54pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
424
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Comment
I've never had a problem with billing or cancelling after joining Karups. It's been a while since I've been a member but they've been using the same billing processor for years so I think you're OK.
|
05-15-09 12:35pm
|
Reply
425
|
Club Red Light
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
I see from the reviews that there's a silent drm on this site. As I'm more of a picture guy I'm wondering how big the pics are and about how many photo sets there are across the site. Thanks.
|
05-14-09 11:46am
|
