| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Rating
1
|
In The Crack
(0)
94.0
|
No Review.
|
03-23-09 08:47pm
|
Rating
2
|
X-Art
(0)
93.0
|
No Review.
|
06-04-11 08:50am
|
Review
3
|
Brazzers
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
o 750+ girls including most of the prominent porn stars on the net
o 2,200+ scenes in a variety of video formats
o "HQ" pics included with most movies
o 24 "sites" (genres)
o Frequent updates (1-2, sometimes more daily) which include the dates they are posted
o Original exclusive content
o Favorites system recording your favorite scenes, and actresses, and takes scene requests
o User rating/comment system for actresses and scenes
o Even better, they actually take at least some suggestions, tag them as user-suggested, and often these are their best movies
o Good use of metadata on the site (tags for actresses, scene descriptions, etc)
o Cheap if you buy a 12 month membership ($95.40) |
| Cons: |
o Cross-selling galore
o Recently produced (in past 2 years) videos are 640x480, older ones are in even lower resolution.
o All videos seem to be encoded with codecs that leave jagged edges and motion artifacts (older ones are much worse)
o HQ pictures are at best 900x600 quality
o Technical issues with some updates
o Some video thumbnails do not match their content, especially on some of the older content
o Though there are some real exceptional videos here and there worth watching reel-to-reel, most are somewhat repetitive and you end up just fast forwarding to the good parts. |
| Bottom Line: |
I would consider this site a "staple" to the porn connoisseur. It has virtually every porn star of note in at least one scene somewhere on the site. Though they don't really specialize in one thing, their shotgun approach to porn suits them well. This is one site that I can say that doesn't bore me after a period of time.
Take the 24 "sites" network with a grain of salt. They are really not distinctive other than their genres. They (mostly) seem to use the same sets with the same lighting with the same style video production, and none are available individually. Most of the sites are self-explanatory with their names. The sites they include are:
Teens Like It Black
Brazzers Vault (stuff that ended up on the cutting room floor)
Big Tits In Sports
Big Butts Like It Big
Real Wife Stories
Teens Like It Big
Asses In Public (all off-set shoots)
Milfs Like It Big
Pornstars Like It Big
SexPro Adventures (porn stars teaching porn stars)
Big Tits At School
Big Tits At Work
Mommy Got Boobs
Baby Got Boobs
Big Wet Butts
Doctor Adventures
Butts & Blacks
Below are included sites which don't seem to be producing new scenes:
Jizz On My Jugs
Jug Fuckers
Racks & Blacks
Busty & Real
Hot Chicks Big Asses
Bustyz
HQ Honeys
I have been a member of this site for several years, and still recommend it given its faults. It really does seem to have something for everyone. |
|
03-23-09 01:48pm
Replies (6)
|
Rating
4
|
Josh Girls
(0)
81.0
|
No Review.
|
06-03-11 12:58pm
|
Rating
5
|
Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
80.0
|
No Review.
|
03-23-09 09:33pm
|
Review
6
|
Sexy Slow Motion
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This is a site with a unique niche- all scenes feature the use of a 600fps (high speed) video camera. Though there is the usual monthly recurring membership which is available, the site does not demand a monthy membership. You can buy individual scenes a la carte for a few (~$4) dollars. You can get a pretty good preview of all the clips available on the site without paying a dime. It's also very exclusive content. Even with having this unique niche video, they didn't forget about high res picture buffs. Each shoot has a series of "high res" (1000x1500) images that compliments the video. Their models are all attractive early 20ish looking models of various figures. |
| Cons: |
The site is a bit small, but it seems to be growing. The video is at a lower res than I like (512x384), and filmed a bit amateurishly (framing problems, camera shake, etc). A tripod or image stabilization on their video is desperately needed. Some of the clips are just entertaining things done in slow motion rather than erotic. But my biggest gripe with this site is that all the clips are in download-resistant Flash video format, which is certainly an annoyance. |
| Bottom Line: |
Every scene features something in slow motion. If you like watching girls running in slow motion on the beach, or butt slaps rippling through a tight body in super slow mo, or water splashing all over some hot bodies, this is your site! The site is generous enough to let you make your own determination with their preview clips of every scene, so you know what you're getting into. This is a novelty site more than a hardcore one. Overall, I enjoyed it for the most part- it's a lot of fun to watch. If the site had higher resolution video in an easily downloadble format, I would give a much higher score.
If you're bored of the same old porn sites, it's a nice change from the norm. This is a soft core site for sure. I would certainly recommend taking a look at it, maybe join for a little while, but if you're looking for hard core porn, keep looking. |
|
03-16-09 09:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
7
|
XXX Sativa Rose
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
o Easy access to many Sativa videos in one place.
o No DRM
o 1-day trial available
o There were some Sativa pics I hadn't seen before, but I can't say it's all exclusive content |
| Cons: |
o No way to download entire galleries- only individual pictures within.
o Videos and pictures classified strangely, and hard to find what you want without going through everything.
o No idea how frequent updates are or when the last one was.
o Video quality was average at best (640x370) |
| Bottom Line: |
This site resembles a model's portfolio rather than a porn site if that makes any sense. It's more or less a conglomeration of pics and video taken by various photographers obviously for other purposes than landing on her site.
I was disappointed overall- saddened actually. I am a huge Sativa Rose fan, and was hoping for some good high quality pics and video with some degree of exclusivity. I'd stick with BangBros or Brazzers (I'm sure there are others too) if you want Sativa Rose's better stuff. |
|
03-23-09 04:36pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
8
|
Bullet Time
(0)
67.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Very unique interesting content
- bullet time 3-d (spin the set)
- stereo anaglyphs (presumably blue/red glasses required)
- Inexpensive ($2.95 for 30 days, no re-bill)
- Signup through CCBill
- Nice looking models I haven't seen before |
| Cons: |
- Updates stopped (last evidence of an update is "Coming Summer 2007", it is now Summer 2009)
- Content loses its novelty value quickly
- Very little content: 4 models, 1 scene each
- Navigation is terrible:
Apparently there's thousands of HD pics, but I can't find them.
- Painfully slow to load
- Bullet time images not downloadable
- errors in some of the bullettime images
- No explantion of how the bullet time pics were made, or how to view stereo anaglyphs
- No video
- No bonus access to other sites
- Lack of quality control |
| Bottom Line: |
This site features girls posed in the soft porn genre in "bullet time" (remember the fight scenes in The Matrix?). A Shockwave app loads, and you control the left and right arrows to view the model from left or right in a about a 180 degree arc. Good luck if you try to download that though. I tried two different applications to grab it which both failed miserably.
If only the execution was as good as the concept! I like soft porn, and this was even a little soft for me. The errors made in producing these images created warped body parts on some of them which is distracting as well.
The site needs work... Maybe it just needs some love? I'm hoping the webmaster isn't a native English speaker, but someone needs to work that site over a bit- just editing text. It needs updates, a way to download the bullet time images, and a way to find the thousands of HD images they claim to have. But they do get mad props for giving this concept a shot.
Bottom line of the Bottom Line:
If you're looking for something different on the net, maybe this site could be worth looking at, but don't expect much. But hey, how many porn site are there that cost less than $3 for a month and don't rebill? |
|
05-21-09 09:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
9
|
Josh Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I'll second mbaya's review. It's up to 155 videos, doesn't seem to be expanding very fast. A lot of it seems repetitive, but it is entertaining, and there are some hot models. This is a good one to join for a month and move on.
|
06-03-11 12:57pm
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Good sites have nothing to hide. The best sites I've joined have all had good previews. If the preview looks like mass-produced non-exclusive crap, that's what tends to be in the site. I'll sometimes join a site because of a great review, but I'll almost never join a site with a bad preview.
|
07-31-09 11:30pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Really interesting results- not what I expected! I would have expected the older age group to be less accepting of tats.
|
07-26-09 03:29pm
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I said no, but that's also because I know the younger-looking models I'm looking at are at least 18, made to look younger. Ironically enough, models who snuck in younger like Tracy Lords made it to the scene because they look older than 18, not younger.
Granted, if they hypothetically looked like actual children, then no, I don't want to see that.
|
07-06-09 09:20pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
No, not at all. As weird as it seems, I just don't fantasize about porn stars- it's the "ordinary-looking women" that I do fantasize about.
|
06-09-09 01:10pm
|
Comment
14
|
Malibu Angels
(0)
|
|
05-12-09 08:31pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
15
|
XXX Sativa Rose
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
No, it does not seem to be part of a network of porn stars.
|
03-24-09 04:51pm
|
Reply
16
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
There's also Busty & Real on the Brazzers site, but point taken. I suppose I do have a big boobs bias to some extent.
|
03-24-09 08:55am
|
Reply
17
|
Nerd Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Jacob's Review
I think you hit on a good point about Sanchez and Ugly. If you like them, they make the site, if you don't like them it can ruin the site. They do come up with some good finds as far as the models go. But Sanchez and Ugly can come across as obnoxious to some people. Personally, I can't stand them, and are the biggest reason I don't watch their videos anymore.
|
03-23-09 08:29pm
|
|
