| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Full screen on my 26" TV mounted on the wall as a second display.
|
06-19-09 07:41am
|
Reply
27
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
Nicely informative. I'm a big fan of Met-Art and always wondered what extra Met Models had to offer.
|
06-06-09 10:46am
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Use an Onkyo 7.1 system here which I'm very happy with. Detached house means I can turn it up as loud as I want but it does keep my daughter (who sleeps above the TV room) awake sometimes. Oh well - we all make sacrifices for others sometimes ;-)
|
06-06-09 10:41am
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Much as I agree with GCode that the creators of the art should be most deserving of recognition, I said musicians, mainly as I don't put writers in the "celebrity" box. Celebrities are people who seek adulation and recognition. Being a muso myself and knowing how damn hard it is and would much rather create something worthwhile and know in my heart it was good rather than stand in front of an audience and get their opinion.
|
06-04-09 02:45pm
|
Reply
30
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Totally agree Monahan. I'm a video guy too but joined MetArt because the photos are just so damn good. I see the video content on MetArt as a bit of a bonus really - not why I joined but occasionally nice to have a vid of a girl you've been admiring the photos of. Uma B was a good example for me - major hot babe with about 5 photo sets and all of a suddden 2 or 3 vids appeared - a nice addition.
I agree with you regarding the model names but at least the names are unique. I'm currently writing a database/website to act as a central model "lookup" for as many popular websites as possible and will let the PU community know as soon as I have a beta sit ready to test.
|
05-11-09 02:05am
|
Reply
31
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Reply
I'ts a bit of a mix. I'd say 8 out of 10 sets start off fully clothed and gradually strip. On average about 40% of a set of photos will be totally naked and most get progressively more explicit - although none get to spread pussy shots.
|
05-11-09 02:00am
|
Review
32
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Features just about the most gorgeous girls on the planet....naked!!! How does that work?!?
+ Huge resolution photo sets
+ Great download manager support with no connection limits
+ All pic sets available in 3 different sizes - all zipped
+ Nice favourites, voting, and model index system
+ Very regular updates
+ Good value for money
+ enormous back catalogue |
| Cons: |
- Some videos are poor (not all though by any stretch)
- No explicit content - a lot of the girls don't even spread :-(
- Like to keep everything? You'll need a few Terabytes of HDD lying around |
| Bottom Line: |
In my eyes the best picture based, non hardcore site on the internet. No question worth the monthly subscription (currently $30 per month, $60 for 3 months or £100 for a year) - 4 updates a day (usually all photo sets but around 10 video updates per month instead of photo setse) - first day of the month is 6 updates.
The site is not explicit, there are no BG sets or insertions of any kind. The odd GG set is tame and not really worth the bother. The real strength of this set is the quality of the models. You know the sort of girl you see in magazines (the sort of girl that doesn't exist in real life - they're just too perfect)? The sort of girl you could never hope to get to first base with let alone any further. Well - Met Art is a strike for the normal guy - a chance to see what these perfect creatures are really like. What's going on under the clothes of a girl with movie star looks. Why these girls take their clothes off for money I have no idea - there's hardly a girl on the site that couldn't earn a perfectly good wage just modeling fully clothed!!
There's a pretty steady influx of new talent too - it's not like they've got a few top quality models to strip and stuck with it - rearely a week goes by without some new knockout talent appearing. And I cant' remember a day going by without at least one new photoset being worthy of...well...worthy of Met Art earning their money from me!!!
The site is quick to navigate with full thumbnails of everything and a full archive going back further than most of us have hard drive space for. Each model is fully indexed so - sea a girl you like? You can easily find all the rest of her content.
The servers are quick and there are no download limits - I set use FDM to run 4 connections and get very few connection issues. Just as well - there's currently around 1Gb new content every single day!
Only slight niggles:
-Video content is often just video of the photoshoots and if not - is often a little too arty for my taste - lots of quick jump edits.
-I'd like a little more info on the models - maybe some interview reels. Most models have a small bio text file but they are VERY short and not really that informative in most cases.
-There's maybe a little too much airbrushing at times but this site is all about perfection so I'm not one to complain about the webmasters going that tiny bit further to float my boat.
I can't recommend this site enough - if you're into art shoots then you'll already be a member, have been a member or have been living in a cave for the last 10 years. If you're into harder stuff then maybe this shou;dn't be you're primary site but...hey...we ALL like beautiful girls yes? They don't get any more beautiful than on Met Art. |
|
05-10-09 03:56pm
Replies (10)
|
Review
33
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Different from any other site you'll find
+ Generaly very hot girls
+ Bonus Photo sets with each download
+ Recent software is pretty reliable
+ Interview videos for each model
+ Cheap if you pay a subscription rather than buying setes on an ad hoc basis
+ great online comments section |
| Cons: |
- No way of viewing the "performances" other than with the software
- Sets ore often not very explicit |
| Bottom Line: |
Bored with the usual sites? Then this is for you. The content is played back using bespoke software meaning the girls appear dancing on your desktop. The software itself is great - small footprint, highly configurable and a recent annnouncement on the site says new sets will be alpha blended (meaning desktop integration will be smoother). You can set up favorites, transparency and even some very nice screensavers.
Nice - EXCEPT there is no way to choose the content - each set is made up of a bunch of stripteases varying from fully clothed teaser sessions through to full spread lovelyness. You can force a girl to strip (right click - strip for me) but you can't choose which video to play - or rewind or pause, etc.
Which makes the whole thing a bit of a gimic really. I thought about trying this out years ago but put it off. The new software and quality of models made me take a 6 month subscription out (currently 10euros per month one new strip per day) but it's very difficult to ...er...."use the naked girls for their intended purpose"...if you catch my drift!! Gorgeous girl gets naked, spreads herself for you (if you're lucky!!) and before you know it she's back fully clothed and poncing about with a pole. Then there's no way to go back and find the content you want again. I guess some may like this luck-of-the-draw. Not me.
Of course, the plus side is 100% exclusive content and there are some VERY hot girls here - Eufrat, Walleria to name but two.
Each stripteased also has a goo quality matching photoset which is also striptease based and set against a plain white background. Each model also has a couple of videos including interview reels - again, a nice feature if you like a particular model.
So - a difficult one to call really. I'll mark it up for being a good community site with hot models and good content BUT the limitations have got to make me mark it down to an "average 79". There was a peice of software for the earlier version sets that allowed you to control what was played back but there's nothing like that for the new version. Shame - as that would fix all my gripes. |
|
05-07-09 04:54pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
34
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
monty2222's Reply
Hi Monty222 - DDF is the production company.
http://ddfprod.com/2257.htm
Stands for Denys DeFrancesco the photographer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denys_Defrancesco
Thanks for reading,
Z
|
04-26-09 02:14pm
|
Review
35
|
1 By Day
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Mostly gorgeous girls.
- Great quality videos
- Full dated complete archive going back to 1st Jan 2001!!
- one click zip downloads
- Download managers supported (using the rollback site - see below)
- Casting videos and pic sets for a lot of the models
- Good mix of soft/hard/lesbian/indoor/outdoor etc. |
| Cons: |
- Horrible new site design (slow to load and uses a login form that stops download mangers from working efficiently. At time of writting however you can still access the site using the rollback server - rollback.1by-day.com - who knows how long they'll keep this online though!)
- Updates dropped to 1 per day rather than the advertised 2 per day as of April 09
- Some sets can be a little formularic (but it's a minor gripe)
- fortnightly "jokes" small picture update instead of a new model with a full video. |
| Bottom Line: |
Hey - it's 1byDay. If you have never been a member at some point then you can't really be a porn hound. Some of the (IMHO) most gorgeous girls in the business started here before they got too much surgery (Juditta), stopped doing hardcore (Eve Angel), or sturated the market (Sandra Shine). Fortunately a lot of those sets are still in the archive. Including the previousl mentioned "used to be perfect" Juditta (I bought a dildo from one of her sets when I was a member back in 2002(ish) and it's still a prised posession.
The girls are often gorgeous (not always it has to be said but more often than not) and are often pretty exclusive to 1BD sites. I've never been a fan of the other niche ddf sites so can't comment on duplicated sets.
The sets are often original concepts with interesting camera work and the vids have the right kind of balance between tease, closeup, full nudity, postions etc.
Everyone should have some DDF content in their collection and 1BD is a good place to start...and maybe even stay!?! |
|
04-26-09 11:19am
Replies (6)
|
Review
36
|
AV Erotica
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of "completely nude" sets
- High Resolution photo sets
- Zipped content
- Exclusive sets
- Good site navigation - uncluttered design
- Online favorites section (galleries & movies)
- Works well with site ripping software & download managers |
| Cons: |
- not much variety (lots of outdoor shoots)
- Nice blog section hasn't been updated for a couple of years
- nothing you can't get on (IMHO) superior sites such as FemJoy and MetArt |
| Bottom Line: |
Don't get me wrong - I like the site. I like my porn to feature insanely beautiful girls. You know - the kind of girls that on an unfair planet you would never get to see topless - let alone spreading their labia. Just occasionally this site delivers one of these creatures and this was what tempted me to AVErotica in the first place. But...it doesn't appear to be happening enough to keep my hard earned money going to Mr Volkov. THere are currently around 130 models on the site and a quick browse through the mug shots only meade we really want to investigate around 10 in any more detail.
The site is well laid out if a little simple and feature light. The set rating feature seems underused (even the "Top Rated" models seem to have only around 80 votes each) so isn't very reliable. Not a big deal to me as I tend to download everything and keep everything but...
Video content is of a high quality but updates are only once a week and most have one of those awful Kenny G style soprano sax soundtraks.
If you're a fan of very naked, usually quite pretty Russian girls in fairly explicit poses then this site is probably for you - especially if you can't afford the membership to MetArt. Nut But I'd be suprised if you kept the membership going for more than a few months. Personally - I'll probably join for a month every other year or so and use download mangers to rip the last year's content as both download speed, no DLManager limitations and full archives will make it a good deal. |
|
04-19-09 03:48pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
37
|
Enter Belladonna
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Belladonna -> She's a dirty, dirty girl!
- Video content pretty good quality and recent posts are single file videos.
- Great BTS and interview videos.
- Lots of exclusive content |
| Cons: |
- Lots of upselling.
- No zipped photo sets.
- Videos only in MOV format.
- No regular update schedule |
| Bottom Line: |
If you're a Belladonna fan then this is a must. Belladonna is a one off - got to be the dirtiest pornstar out there - double, triple are just the beginning! I usually like my porn to involve beutiful girls with knockout bdies - but Bella is the exception. OK - she's not classically pretty and her body is not perfect but it's what she does with what she's got that makes her stand out.
Site is a little outdated these days - has a bit of a 90's feel to it and navigation is a bit amateur but it's the content that matters and a good download manager will get you some nice hardcore, dirty porn. |
|
04-14-09 04:52pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Errr....12Tb and counting!
|
04-14-09 04:40pm
|
