Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Around 20 scenes, videos and photos (Videos at 640x 480 WMV and images around 768px × 1,024px, although no zip option for images.)
- Great download speeds although not enough download options regarding video quality
- Rough hardcore (the girls seem to be really into it and there is some pretty rough deepthroating and some choking. Not very much anal play though)
- Some cute models (Hillary Scott)
- The girls all wear cute clothing and in some scenes they keep some of their stuff on, so there is some nice variation.
- Full network access with some of the models appearing on other network sites as well.
Cons:
- The site is tiny (only about 20 scenes and while the sex is pretty hot several of the models are pretty well known so not a lot of new stuff here)
- Doesn't seem to get any new updates.
- Video quality could be much better, also I'd appreciate better lighting (sometimes when they go for a close-up the image gets too dark because of the angle)
- Most of the scenes seem kinda generic, the girls don't look into the camera a lot and some of them seem to just go through the action kinda mechanically. (One girl in particular just kept screaming I've been bad daddy, give it to me daddy, to the point where it got very distracting.) Too much focus on the whole daddy's girl aspect
- The lack of zipped archives and some rather poor photo scenes make it clear the focus here is videos, but we don't have HD or particularly unique videos so... well let's just way that this is overall one of the weakest sites of the network
Bottom Line:
First of all beware of the trial for this network since it doesn't really work well (you only get some scenes and it changes into a full membership rather abruptly). Secondly, don't expect that this network will change your life, they have some good content but overall they are pretty average, especially if you're looking for young adult stuff.
I'd say the stocking/ leg niche and the Asian angle is what they focus on although backstabingsluts is also very nice. Either way, young adult is not their cup of tea and it's very obvious. This is the only site dedicated to young adults and it's not very large or very unique by a long stretch
Now don't get me wrong, the scenes are pretty intense and I believe exclusive, however they are virtually the same to what you could find on the majority of hardcore DVD's.
For the sake of compassion I watched some of the scenes here next to scenes I had from videobox and to be honest I couldn't tell which was which (well, that's a lie, the videobox movies were in better resolution so there's that)
Each scene seems to start with the girl dancing around a bit to standard porn music. After a few minutes a guy walks in and we get some pretty rough sex, including some spankings, deepthroating and a bit of playful choking. There is the standard porn dialogue: "You're a bad girl, I'll have to send you to your room" and the standard blow job, sex, cum-shot routine (Interesting enough most sites in the network don't follow this routine, with a lot more 69, toys or other types of interesting/ different sex)
Nothing on here comes close to the intensity of something like Facial abuse, but we're not talking about softcore porn either. Basically the scenes are similar to what you'd find on the Barely 18 series of DVD's or Cum stained casting couch or most Hustler videos. Good old fashioned porn with girls that could be anywhere from 20 to 30 and pretend they are much younger. Big lollipops are present, along with ridiculously short skirts and make-up smears.
However, at the end of the day you can get more young adult content for your money on other sites, shorter miniskirts and more intense hardcore action along with younger looking models. Try Teencoreclub, Firstanalquest, 21sextury, Nubiles, or good old Videobox.
Any of those sites have better camerawork and more girls, along with much easier navigation (I didn't mention it so far but this site is basically one page where all the scenes, video or photo are mixed together, no search options, no categories, no model index, no multiple download options, overall just the bare bones of a site.)
However, if the rest of the network attracts you then this could be a nice, if not very big bonus site. Their Asian content and the stocking sites are much more interesting so check those out and look at this site as a bonus not a main attraction.
P.S. I uploaded a review for one of the stocking sites as well so you can get an idea as to what kind of content they have there.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Over 100 scenes most of them with image sets and videos (Movies come usually as WMV at 640x 480, but some have MPEG formats at smaller resolutions. Also some scenes are available as clips or 320x 240 resolution. Images were around 768px × 1,024px)
- A great variation in models (some Russian teens, some more mature models, a lot more Asian girls than similar networks so that was a nice surprise)
- The tour gives a good impression of the action inside the site, some lesbian (2-3 scenes) a little anal (more of the recent stuff has it, I'd say maybe 20 scenes overall) and mostly hardcore boy girl with focus on outfits/ stockings, including some footjobs and guys cumming on the girls feet. Overall a lot of variation (which is good and bad at the same time)
- Some hot models that really seem into it
- Full network access with a few more sites that are very similar.
- Download speeds were very good and I didn't have any trouble navigating the site. (No dead links, no sudden sign-outs)
Cons:
- The site updates randomly, the latest scene on 03/04/11 the one before on 12/12/10 (3 or 4 videos in December last year, with not much before then)
- The site is really not focused on images (some sets only have the girl stripping and none of them have a zipped folder download option)
- More and better quality video options would be nice (the camera work is not always the best (awkward angles and poor lighting really hurt many of the videos))
- The whole site feels like it has 3 very different types of content(I'll elaborate in the bottom line, but overall there is a kind of strange break between various scenes.)
- Navigation, while it works is not the best. No search options, no way to tell what happens in the scene, no model index. The site is basically a page that shows all the sets movies and pictures mixed together on one page. It's simple to the point where it's frustrating, especially when a photo set shows up but you have to hunt for the movie.
- Some sets are mislabeled
Bottom Line:
This has gotta be one of the strangest sites I have joined in a while. The members page is a black screen with thumbnails of the movies and the photos all together on one page, mixed with each other to the point where it's hard to understand what exactly you're getting (a few of the older sets are also mislabeled or several of the girls have the same name)
Basically I wanted to get the scene with Brigitte white from the preview tour. I click on the movie of the model called Brigitte only to realize that it's another model, of course the thumbnail was so unclear and they had no preview images so I only realized I had the wrong video after finishing the download. I go back only to realize there is no Brigitte movie... I think. Not sure since there is no way to search for a particular model or type of scene. Even worse, they have no zip archive... but they do have a slideshow option so there's that. But wait, a bunch of the photos are actually not hardcore action, just the girl getting undressed. Maybe I could stream the scene instead, alas no streaming available on this site. At least the downloads went incredibly fast, got a 400 mb scene in just a minute or so.
To make things even more confusing there seem to be 3 types of scenes on the site. The very first 20 or so scenes feature English speaking girls, dialogue (mostly stuff along the lines of: "Those are hot stockings, you make me hard, I am cumming now.") and a lot of focus on the stockings, cumming on the stockings and rubbing the penis on the stockings (These scenes are all named "ss_model name" and are very similar to what the preview tour promises, just see the trailers to get an idea of what these scenes look like).
The next bunch of videos named "was_model name" seem to be pretty generic hardcore Russian porn. No talking, no music, guy walks in and within 30 seconds the girl is blowing him. The models are also not as cute in my opinion, they look more generic Russian porn-like, and there is not nearly enough focus on stockings.
Finally the last kind of videos which only have the model name are little story scenes (girl dressed up as bride, girl dressed up as secretary, etc.) and have horrible, horrible music. I swear I have never heard such poor choices for porn music.
Scattered among those rather generic and boring types of scenes there are some real gems. I found one scene where the girl tries on several pairs of stockings in front of a guy before having sex, I also found a really good video with a bunch of behind the scenes type of directions and an adorable model in crotchless panties.
Sadly there is no easy way to tell which scene will be interesting/ different and which one will be a 15 minute close up of a girl's back in doggy style. Some scenes have the girl look straight at the camera as she puts on stockings or plays with herself, some are nothing but poor close-ups of genitalia. Overall a rather strange mash-up of scenes that feel like they belong on different sites.
Aside from the strange discrepancies in the content the site was overall average. Navigation was sub-par but the large network makes up for it ( check out like legs and secretary hoes since both have a bunch of stocking material). Download speeds were very fast, but the lack of more download options/ better quality videos brings the score back down. The models were okay, with no exceptionally ugly or beautiful girls standing out. Overall a nice mix of English and Russian girls (they are missing out on some really cute girls though, no Aspen, no Payton or Flick, no Amai Liu or Sasha Grey).
Another unhappy point is the technical quality of the videos. Sadly, I think none of the videos looked as good as the preview page made them appear. The lighting is not always optimal and sometimes the camera guy focuses on the wrong things (please no close up of a dude's face while he's jacking off.) also I think the three preview videos are a bit misleading since most of the content, especially more recent stuff is not really representative of those trailers (In my opinion)
That being said there are some nice gems hidden here and if you do join I recommend Whitney and Anne as their scenes were some of the more interesting ones. Also make sure to check out the rest of the network.
Joined this network a while back and grabbed their videos, finally getting around to watching a few more carefully today. I don't remember exactly the technical aspects of the network, but most of the videos look nice. The teens are cute (although they show up on many other networks) and they do hardcore, with a lot of anal. However, most scenes feel very generic, I honestly thought that I had just grabbed some stuff from TeenMegamovs until I looked at the names of the scenes. The lighting is not the best and the whole action just feels a bit on the Meh side.
I hope I'm not complaining too much, but it does feel like a lot of these Russian sites airbrush the heck out of their preview page to the point that even when the girls are hot, the actual videos feel disappointing.
Every since I got a smartphone that shows photos nicely but videos not so much I started collecting more and more images. They also tend to occupy less space. That being said I still have over 1 terabite of videos.
This is a good debate. I can only add from my experience with the wife. She jack's it way more than me, since for here it's a good turn-on. I feel she might be in the minority here though.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Maybe 11 videos and 78 photo sets of various quality (mostly really bad stuff, videos are around 320x240 and images are around 768px × 1,024px)
- They have zipped images and some hardcore action, some stripping, all outdoors
- The site came bundled in a network deal so I guess I didn't technically spend money on this particular site.
- Navigation worked okayish most of the time and the whole using the site experience was adequate (downloads worked, I didn't get kicked out suddenly and the links worked)
Cons:
- Very few videos and few images. To make things worse the quality of most images and all videos is very poor. The scenes have inadequate lighting and for the most part mediocre camera work.
- No diverse options when downloading size or quality wise. In fact, overall the site looks like it was made 10-15 years ago and never updated the technical side
- Some sets look recycled from the '70 some look like they belong on a different network (I swear I saw a bangbus set on here) I don't think there is anything remarkable or interesting about the content, it seems all non -exclusive image sets from diverse places and poor quality clips.
- Nothing British about the models, no apparent rhyme or reason to the scenes. No modes page or way to easily browse the scenes.
- They have adds for other sites in the members section
- While they do daily updates it looks like they simply recycle content, the newer content looks just as bad as the old, with no foreseeable improvement.
Bottom Line:
I don't know what you're interested in but this site doesn't have it, trust me you're probably better off with a Google image search. I have seen preview pages for some sites that were way more impressive than the members section of this site. Why? Well let's take a quick tour
The video section is a joke, 11 scenes at 320x 240 resolution with very, very generic porn action. Even more interesting the oldest video is from august this year and the most recent is from September, combined with the fact that all scenes look like they were filmed before digital cameras were invented it's pretty obvious they are recycling content.
The photo section is a bit better, we have around 80 sets with anywhere between 20 to 100 images each. Some look like behind the scene photos (the girl smiles next to a guy with a flaccid penis) some look like screengrabs from a hardcore movie and the rest look like old discolored photos you might find in your dad's collection.
The action in the scene is all over the place, there are some scenes where the girls don't even take their clothes off, some DP, some stripping outdoors, some dildo... overall a hodgepodge that doesn't make any sense. You have anything here from Hillary Scott deepthroating a dude to stuff that would maybe be at home on Met-art if they decided to give up on good quality, HD photos.
So the content is poor, the quality of the images and video is bad,the website navigates like an amateur project put together by someone with minimal HTML knowledge. There is no way to find specific categories of action or particular models, to get to the scenes you have to click the images, but not the texts, although they are links as well. Oh and don't even bother with streaming the videos, of navigating the images with their image browser that is also a joke and will break on you.
Overall there is nothing here that redeems the site. I got it as a special deal when I joined a network and was just impressed at the poor quality. If I had paid to be here I would demand my money back, it's simply a poor site. Maybe the sites they offer as bonus are better (I didn't check those out so maybe those are awesome and worth it... but I doubt it.)
I got inside the site through a special discount from another network and so far it looks pretty similar to backroomcastingcouch, but they have less updates so far. The models seem about the same quality and the scenes follow the same kind of script.
Interesting content and I'm really curious how the site will evolve. I hope they keep updating as the interviews with amateur girls are always fun.
Decided to join this site since I wanted to get some more images of teens and young adult models. No complaint there. A lot of galleries of European models, a lot of cute outfits and a bunch of stockings. The action is a bit formulaic indeed (stripping, play with themselves a bit and dildo) but I'm not sure how much variation they could have seeing as everything here is solo action
The videos are actually not all that bad, but only solo action here.
Also I'm uncertain what their update schedule is. I've only been a member for less than a week and have seen no new stuff yet, maybe things will look better in a month. Will update as soon as I understand how they work.
PS. wanted to mention their high quality is around 1,333px × 2,000px and the low is around 400px × 600px
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Around 390 scenes (120 anal an the rest lesbian or vaginal) (Potentially way more videos with the network membership but had some errors, see bellow)
- Both American and Russian models of good quality :) What other site offers Aspen and Chastity on the same page?
- Earliest content is from 2005, but there seem to be a lot more recent updates, with several videos posted this year (07 of 2011 seems to have been a great time for them) (However the updates seem completely random)
- Very hot and very extreme action. I wouldn't say they are better than anal acrobats, but the site is up there. Great close-ups of massive gape, a lot of ass to mouth and indeed brutal dildos
- Very good looking models who truly seem to enjoy the action.
-Decent options when it comes to downloads (1920 WMV to 640 mp4 or mpg, although older content is just 640 and 320) Overall all the scenes I looked at were very decently lit and played well. Photos are zipped and good quality
Cons:
- The main issue I had with the site was in the network area. For example the lesbian section of the site actually leads to huge strap-on lesbians site. This doesn't mean that brutal dildos doesn't have lesbian content it's just categorized under the solo archive. This would be fine if the links worked properly, but half the time trying to go to a different site in the network lead to me getting a big error and having to log back in. Which also meant that all the downloads I had going were canceled. In the end the webmaster was nice about it, but so far the issue is still not really fixed.
- Speaking of content being categorized wrong, there is no real way to sort through the scenes. You get a vaginal or anal dildo checkbox but that is it. No way to select the age of the model (which ranges quite a lot) or if she's Russian or American
- To make things worse the bonus pics and movies are a joke. Old content that looks dated and is hard to navigate.
Bottom Line:
So what is the bottom line? The site promises brutal dildo action and delivers it plenty. Sure there are some quirks with the network and sure some of the models might not be the hottest girls on the planet (especially the older updates have some really questionable girls) but damn the site delivers.
Each video is about 20 minutes and they tend to start with the girls stripping a bit, playing with themselves and generally getting ready. Then we get one or two huge novelty dildos and depending on the video we get to see some incredible vaginal stretching or some massive anal gape. For the most part the girls seem really into it and suck the dildos periodically, play with themselves and look into the camera often enough. Also it's nice to see them riding the dildos and look really excited.
The enthusiasm of the girls is what really sells this site. I've been a member of many hardcore and anal sites and very often you get a girl that looks bored or uncomfortable, not here sir. This is one of those few sites where the models all seem into it and the fact that they do the insertions themselves seems to make most girls a lot more comfortable and open. Great job in that aspect.
So far the site seems great, enthusiasm, great action, decent videos, hot models (again, the more recent ones are great, with a few hidden gems in the archive) however there are several flaws that bring the score down.
One of the flaws inherent in a dildo site is that some scenes will simply look fake, when a girl kisses the balls of the dildo, trying to look sexy it sadly seems mostly stupid. I get that they should lick the dildos but why do they have to pretend it's a real cock? Also since no one is really cumming in these shots most scenes kinda just end. Some girls try to seem satisfied, but some just look the same and the video cuts to black. A bit more acting towards the end could really help some of these scenes.
Also for a site that is all about extreme insertions you get a surprisingly little amount of DP or variety among the toys (I swear I started to recognize the dildos from one scene to the other) I guess I'm a bit spoiled by Analacrobats, the ultimate when it comes to anal and dildos, but it just felt like this site could benefit from a bit of creativity. At least many of the models have stockings and cute outfits so that somewhat redeems things.
Finally one other thing that bothered me about content was that some "recent" updates are clearly older material (given away by both in the way the models look and act as well as the lack of a HD version of the video) I guess that is bound to happen but I still felt a bit cheated. To make things just a bit worse I found one or two videos from other sites. No big deal but a bit of a shame really.
I already mentioned that I had some connectivity issues with some sites in the network not automatically logging me in (most worked fine, but once it a while I'd get a bad cookie or something) Also, like I mentioned the bonus pic and movie section is mostly some very poor quality jpegs and some old DVD's that are really a let down.
But enough with the negative stuff. Like I said for the most part the site delivers and the network helps make it a decent deal, especially if you're bored with boy girl hardcore sex and you have most of Anal Acrobats already. There are some great scenes here and while you're bound to recognize many of the models they are still cute and willing to do some pretty crazy stuff for your entertainment.
Before you join do make sure you're okay with extreme dildo action. If you're troubled by girls gaping orifices, ass to mouth and other generally intense sex this is not for you.
Good review man. Sorry to hear that the site is not really up to modern day standards.
Since the site focuses on images, would you mind talking a bit about the images? Like what sizes do you get? If they are HD and competitive to Met-art or such sites I might maybe consider joining...
I see Drooler's point, but to be honest I love it when a site at least tries to name their sets something that makes sense. As a guy that has a huge Misc-random-crap folder this is a nice improvement. I hope other sites follow the example :)
I guess the idea is to humiliate the other person, so I can see how it has a place in bondage stuff. Seeing as I am not interested in that kind of stuff normally pee is not really my cup of tea...
Just wanted to reply and note that they will have an update for the site soon (according teencore main network site). Let's hope that it's not the last :)
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Around 180 scenes and they update the site very heavily (I believe thy had an update per day for September so things are looking good)
- A lot of cute models doing mostly hardcore action (including a lot of anal and some lesbian anal toy play)
- Each set has video as well as images downloadable as zipped files. (Images are around 960px × 1,440px or 1,440px × 960px. Videos come in three categories high WMV files, Medium FLV and "portable" quality MP4)
- The network, while not perfect allows for easy log-in in all the websites you are a member off so you can easily search for more scenes featuring a particular model. Or you can try to use the advance search function which (almost always) returns pretty accurate results
- Each update has a nice tagging feature so you can quickly tell what the scene will contain, the model name age and date it was added onto the site.
- The action in the videos is varied and pretty hot for the most part. Good camerawork and nice models
Cons:
- There are a lot of small issues with the site and the network in general, many of which I mentioned in my review of Fuckstudies. The thumbnails are not very revealing as to what happens in any given scene, downloads sometimes cut out for me. Many of the models are re-named so it makes it hard to find a particular model (Aspen is named Galina for example)A few of the links are broken taking you to the main page instead of where you wanted to go to. All models are 18, even if they have scenes on the site in 2009 and 2011.
- Aside from the network wide minor issues this site has a few odd quirks of it's own. Several of the scenes seem to be taken from other sites (some in the network some not.) They have at least one scene from Firstanalquest and a few from other sites.
- Along with the non-exclusive content the variation in the scenes is a bit strange. You have a few videos of solo girls with toys, some lesbian, some threesome, some hardcore anal. It all feels a bit chaotic
Bottom Line:
I've been a member of this network for a long time on and off. My latest membership was probably a year and a half ago and a lot has changed since. They always used to have more unknown models doing pretty hardcore stuff with male models that looked about their age. Overall there was a feeling of home made amateur Russian videos, with kinda crappy lighting and awkward scenes (I remember a few where the male model couldn't get hard enough to properly fuck)
This all changed for the better since I was last on the website. The male models seem a lot more confident, the camera work is improved and the WMV high definition (which is not truly HD, but close) was a much needed addition. All the while the girls are still cute and a bit awkward, making for some very hot scenes. Note how I said some hot scenes, because not all scenes are that great.
Sadly, a few of the girls are not the most beautiful or young looking models out there, and while I know that what constitutes beauty is very subjective teens with massive fake boobs just seem off-putting on a site such as this. Also girls that seem really not into it or even in pain make for very bad scenes. It puzzles me how on the same site you get girls that positively seem to jump on the guys cock along with girls that look confused and generally uncomfortable with the whole deal.
Furthermore, to be honest the lesbian scenes didn't do it for me. On Lezcuties you get some very hot girls who seem all the way into it here maybe every other video seems to have that kind of passion. If you have a lesbian scene you must get girls that are into giving head, sucking nipples and caressing as opposed to just grabbing toys and jamming them in their partner.
Since we're talking about inconsistencies among models I guess I should mention the solo action. You have some models that do anal toys, some that fist themselves and some that just use their hands very delicately. Overall it's a bit strange and some more ways of filtering content would be nice.
I realize that criticizing models or their level of enthusiasm is a very subjective way to approach a site review, but the inconsistency between how the models act within the same network makes for an odd experience. I guess the fact that scenes are used from different places is to blame for this, but still, more careful selection of the scenes included in the site would help.
Also a way to quickly sort the type of scenes would help. It's strange to navigate the site and see 3 solo girls along with a hardcore anal gape all on the same page.
Better navigation in general would be nice. The site right now is a bit clumsy and the search failed me several times. For example I couldn't figure out a way to see just the models that appear on one site, probably no one cares about this feature since all sites seem very similar. I for one had hopped that Beauty angels would be more focused on solo, maybe some lesbian action, definitely more stripping and focus on the models. Instead half the scenes are identical to the rest of the network with brutal anal sex to the point where the rest seem out of place.
I guess the moral of the story is that you should join the whole network and expect more content similar to hardcoreyouth or analteenangels than met-art or nubiles. The focus is on hardcore action and while the site does deliver, at the end of the day I still felt like something was missing. The rest of the network offers enough other content to compensate but this particular site could benefit from a bit of reworking and a different approach.
Overall if you never joined the network or if some of the models seem incredibly attractive to you, a month of membership is not bad. But make sure that you also want the content on Fuckstudies, teenmoviemania and tricky masseur. If you want just anal action, Firstanalquest might be a better fit and if you're looking for hardcore gorgeous teens consider teencorenetwork.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A lot of content (due to the size of the archive and all the different kinds of content available I couldn't really get a feel for how much stuff is here, but the main image galleries go back to 1999 and the video features start in 2000 and the live chats are also probably from that time onwards... so yeah. a lot of stuff here)
- With any huge archive like this, content varies in both quality and what happens in the scenes. Older stuff is more focused on girls stripping, while more recent stuff has some more masturbation and lesbian stuff. I am not 100% sure but at least most of the new stuff is all original.
- Decent navigation (some videos don't have proper links and sometimes it's hard to tell what star shows up in the scene, but overall it all works) Also the model directory is very well put together with links to the models page.
- Some hot models, all well known porn actresses for the most part (Lexi Belle, Sunny, etc)
Cons:
- Some of the older stuff doesn't stream properly and sometimes the downloads failed for no apparent reason. (Everything recent worked fine)
- Some of the content is strange (they have a naked joke of the week which is just a naked girl say a joke in 30 seconds or so... The girls try to make it hot but it kinda doesn't work.. also the Virtual lap dance doesn't really have a purpose when you can see the same girl masturbating in a live chat)
- Some sections of the site have not been updated for a while (Model diary hasn't been updated since 2010, some of the photo galleries are just 4 images or even less)
- Not a lot of focus on images or not the right focus. They have a huge collection of casting calls but each only shows 3-4 images of the girl being cast.
- Sometimes it's hard to find all content by one model
- Some live chats are better than others, but I guess that's something that is unavoidable.
Bottom Line:
This site is very different from the average porn out there. The main reason is that the entire focus is on the models and their personality. Almost all recent girls have a live chat and a lot of them used to have a model diary until that section stopped updating. If you're interested in knowing more about a girl, hearing her talk while masturbating or having lesbian sex than this site is perfect for you.
The model diary still has a lot of videos where the girls answer a bunch of questions while naked and playing with themselves. It's somewhat similar to those interviews they now have in gonzo shots, but instead of some faceless dude asking a girl who looks nervous you get a confident model who asks the questions herself while moving around a bed or touching herself.
The live chat is even better since it actually allows you to ask a few questions in hope they might be answered (I didn't catch any of the actual live ones, but the older stuff is all archived so you can enjoy a lot of hot girls that have already been featured.
These two sections of the site make it all worth it in my opinion. Where else do you get to see two porn stars banter a bit and joke around before having sex? Or hear a hot girl discuss her preference for thongs.
Of course the fact that the live chat is not heavily scripted means some girls will just giggle and moan while others are actually interesting. But overall I'd say it's still something different and exciting.
Now that I praised the site let's take a look at the less perfect aspects. Some of the content can get repetitive and boring. We have the virtual lap dance, which is just a girl stripping, not even her touching herself. They seem to have stopped updating those, but we still get a ton of stripping on the live event. I mean one video of Lexi Belle stripping is nice, but they have at least 3. Then you have the casting calls, which are also a great idea, but they only seem to have 2-3 images for each girl, almost makes you wonder why they bother. Bloopers of the week is one image, behind the scenes is also an image or two. although we occasionally get a behind the scene video
The feature videos also range in quality, although for the most part you get some pretty hot lesbian action so I guess that's fine. I just wish the older stuff was better quality and the streaming player worked for the entire site.
Also I'd like it if the content was better organized. Right now I thought it was a bit hard to find certain models or a certain type of scene. Also some thumbnails showing what the scene is about would be nice.
I hope it's clear that overall the negative aspects are mostly detail stuff and the very, very hot interviews make up for what is lacking. You basically get a more intimate view of many porn models that show up on other sites and DVD's, along with some scenes of the same models stripping and/or masturbating. You get to interact with the models a bit and also see them answering questions. So if that is what you want than this site is perfect. Not so much if you only want hardcore boy girl action or completely new faces.
Of course there could still be some improvement. More focus on the backstage stuff (maybe some videos of the girls getting ready for the feature scene, or maybe showing them trying on different outfits or more updated model diaries) any of those would be nice. They could even choose to do the naked joke as a bit while the girl is getting ready for her interview. I think it would make it better and more interesting than what it's now.
Navigation could use a face-lift and the download speeds were sometimes slow or cut out for the older stuff (I believe they must use some different servers for the older content)
But anyway, as far as a good place to get a lot of hot, full bodied porn actresses this has got to be it. I don't think many sites offer so many interviews and chat opportunities as Danni does.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The previous two reviews on here say 30 scenes and 50 scenes. Right now they have around 100 and it looks like they are going strong with updates every week.
- High quality video as well as images (average images are around 1,440px × 960px or 960px × 1,440px) and video range from around 100x720 for High to 860x480 Medium and 640 or so for low.
- Some very cute models and some that I have not seen on other sites.
- They all do hardcore and many do anal (In fact for the more recent updates I'd say every girl does anal)
- Variation in the scenes and what goes on (I'll detail on this in my final comments)
- Always had good download speeds with very impressive spikes (got a 300 mb video in 1 minute)
- Support staff was courteous and quick to reply to a feedback e-mail I sent a while back. There is also a forum and administrators respond to the threads almost every time. It's nothing too spectacular, but it's nice to know you can have your opinion heard
Cons:
- I got this site as part of a Teenmagaworld so I'm not really complaining, but several of the 22 sites they have have not been updated since 2009 or so. The most updated seem to be fuck studies, beauty angels, teen sexmovs, Tricky Masseur and teen sex mania. Although to be honest I am not sure if there are huge differences in regards to the content each site specializes in. Just make sure you join the right site or the whole network so you don't somehow loose access to the currently updating sites.
-The 2 say trial is more of a joke than anything. Just trust me on this one, don't bother. Just get the full membership.
-A lot of small cosmetic issues nothing bit but...(navigation can be a bit clumsy at times, girls don't have the same name as they do on most sites, making it hard to figure if you know the model before or not. Some of the thumbnails are not revealing at all, some links take you back to the main page instead of where they are supposed to go.)
Bottom Line:
I have been a member of this network back in the day (I believe 2008 or so) since then the site has grown quite nicely.
I remember you used to have to log into each site individually, now there is a very nice overarching network that can take you to all scenes a model has, all recent updates and there is a page that can send you to all the specific content a site has (it's nice to see even old sites got a face lift and for the most part are much easier to navigate)
Each scene allows you to stream it (and it works great) post comments on the action (a very nice feature that can be quite useful as other users can identify the model or comment on where else on the net you can find here. ) or download the action in several formats (they don't really tell you the formats, just say high, medium, low, mobile, ipod, but for the most part it's all WMV except for the ipod format which is mp4)
Also each scene has a "date added", model age, name and tags of the kind of action she does. Of course everyone seems to be 18 and the names are for the most part messed up (models who are always known by Sasha or Kelsie here are called something else entirely) But nonetheless this feature makes browsing much easier and for the most part things work fine.
One of the things that irk me are the fact that you get just one thumbnail unless you enter the set and sometimes that thumbnail can tell you nothing except that there will be a penis and a vagina involved. I'd love it if they would implement the feature a lot of sites seem to have where you can hover the mouse and see a few different images from the movie, or maybe allow you to see a few more sample shots before clicking on a scene. Also I'd love it if instead of 7medium.wmv the scene could save as Valentinamedium.wmv. I know almost none of the Russian sites do this (Teencorenetwork names everything I01 ) but it would be nice.
So much for the technical side of the site. It has a few quirks, but it's a huge improvement and I like it a lot more than many other sites. Now to the content itself.
Back in the day this network had a few very cute models and a ton of poor quality videos of so-so girls. Nowadays they upped the game and they seem to have solely hot, rather unknown models and they almost all do anal. Also if you get the network membership you are guaranteed to get a few more scenes with the girl on one of the other sites.
Overall I am very happy with the quality of the girls they have now as well as the variation between the models. There are some girls who seem to jump on the cock while others are hesitant and have to convinced. It makes for a nice difference in action. Speaking of which I am happy to say that this site does a great job of keeping things fresh. Sometimes the girl will wear stoking for the whole scene, sometimes she is completely naked, sometimes she still wears her top. Sometimes they have vaginal sex, oral then anal, sometimes they go straight for the anal. The male model is sometimes supposed to be the teacher, other times he is another student, sometimes the girl starts fingering herself before he shows up, other times the guy seduces her. Basically what I'm saying is that each scene is different and you never know what you'll get.
One other interesting bit was that some scenes have subtitles. You're not missing much as the dialogue is usually along the lines of: "But you're my teacher, I can't have sex with you...okay, put it in my but" but it's an interesting work-around for the non-english speaking girls. I'd like to see some backstage interviews or something like that, but I guess you can't have it all.
Overall the network reminds me more of 21sextury than anything else, but they don't put a lot of make up on girls and don't have the lesbian focus some of the 21sextury sites do. So maybe a combination of the action from Firstanalquest (there is a lot of anal here) and the network and support from 21sextury is the best description. I hope they keep up the good work as they can easily become the best Russian teen site around.
Joined through a 10 bucks special offer and downloaded a bunch of galleries, some pretty nice (and I think exclusive) solo girls, a few lesbian and some more hardcore sex scenes. Nothing too crazy, no bondage, anal or other fetishes here, just good old fashioned porn :).
Sadly most images seem to be rather on the low end (around 600x 1000 or so) but I really enjoyed their lesbian stuff and the focus they have on the girls faces. Almost all sets focus on them smiling, with a few close-ups of the action sprinkled here and there. They also have some milf, and boy girl but like I said mostly solo toy stuff.
I have yet to check out the videos, but they mostly seem poor quality. Overall I think the preview gives a great idea about what you get here. A bunch of fun, simple galleries, worth about 10 bucks :)
First of all thanks for the review. This is some good info. I was considering joining this site a while back because of the Romanian models (love me some naked Romanians :)
I am just curious what do you mean when you say large files? Like 1 gb for the videos, because the quality seems pretty bad. I can't imagine they have HD scenes. Could you please give some mgb estimates? Maybe some idea about video sizes if you can (other people mentioned quality but no one mentioned video sizes yet.)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Relatively easy to navigate, nothing too crazy, but it works well enough for what it is. Has a nice slideshow feature for the galleries. Has a bunch of categories you can use to search the site (although half of them don't work)
- Lots and lots of photos (Around 450 models and each one seems to have on average 3-5 sets of images, so about 500 images total...)
- The streaming videos work very well (they are not an incredible value, just scenes from other sites or DVD's and no downloading, but the streaming system works well and has a nice navigation menu.)
- Some cute models (again I don't think they have anything exclusive, but it's interesting to see photo shoots from various places gathered under one domain. Some scenes make the girls look like amateurs, some make them look all "dolled-up")
- Nice mix of lesbian, hardcore and solo, with a lot of focus on glamor and solo stuff. Overall reminded me of Penthouse and other older magazines in style and feel.
Cons:
- There is no really good way to navigate the site quickly. The categories don't return accurate answers, the search is rather buggy and there is no way to get the videos to show up in search (Heck I don't even know how many videos they have, I tried clicking next until I reached the end of the video galley but lost count. I guess that's good, right?)
-The images are all around 681px × 1,024px so no great quality there.
-The last updates seem to be from 06/2011 with more updates promised for later in the month (Not sure what happened there... guess the webmaster forgot what month it is.)
-There's nothing in the content section that will make you go wow. Not very hardcore and while some models are cute, the way they are shot is very old school (hell, some of the models are taken from Penthouse and look straight out of the 90's. Hot teen in jean overalls anyone?)
Bottom Line:
I joined this site mostly because I wanted to see some of the models from the olden days :) and didn't want to join several sites to get their images. I wanted to see if I could get an amateur shot with Sunny Leone, Monica Sweetheart or Tory Lane on the same site that could show me their hardcore scenes.
As far as that goes the site is great. You get to see a lot of the models in what could very well be their first photo shoot (no make up, they look slightly younger) and then later in a hardcore scene(nothing too crazy, just some good old vaginal and oral sex )Here let me give some examples: I found a very cute amateur shot of Sunny Lane along with her more regular hardcore sex :) I had never seen her without any make-up and in Ugg boots so that was nice. But I also found the PenthouseSunny Leone images which I remember from the actual magazine. Very convenient to have both in one place.
Unfortunately there are not that many well known models on the site. I couldn't find Katie Morgan, Sandy Sweet, Cassie Young...and a bunch of other names that have been around forever.
I guess the moral is that the site kinda fails on two levels. It doesn't offer exclusive content, but it's not Videobox for images either.I had hoped they maybe had a lot more images from the 90, 80, and maybe even earlier, but that wasn't really the case.
The rest of the sites in the network seem nice and I'll have to check them out more later, but there seem to be 10 or so straight, classic porn sites. Sadly, the live show feature didn't work for me and I couldn't log into the bonus free cams despite having a functioning username and pass. I have a ticket with the support team and maybe they'll figure it out, but it's not a big deal for me as the cams didn't seem too crazy or high quality.
The technical side of the site itself was okay, like I mentioned above, navigation by category was pretty broken and the search didn't work well. I looked up sunny lane and it gave me no results I looked up young and there is good old sunny... no clue why or how it happened.
The best way to work the site is to look for model name and go by that... kinda clunky if you ask me, but I guess it works well enough, as long as you know what model you're looking for or if you are in the mood to browse through 400+ models.
What else... I guess that's about it. There are images of naked girls here, not much, not less. A bit boring and bland, exciting to see because of the amateur shots vs the professional shots of the same girl, but not a must see. In fact looking back I should have probably gotten a membership to Twisty's or Penthouse or maybe even Playboy... but then I wouldn't have a shot of Tanya James in funny pajama pants along with her hardcore scenes...
I hope that last sentence illustrates what kind of mindset you should have when approaching this site :)
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good quality video and images.
- Pretty good looking models. The same high quality girls that the rest of the Teencorenetwork has.
- Comes with the rest of the network subscription so it's just more good content for the same price.
- Sometimes download speeds are incredible. 1 mb per second is pretty impressive in my book although sometimes speeds are ridiculously slow...about 50/50 I'd say)
-Same simple navigation the rest of the site has.
-Scenes are different from the rest of the site, more hardcore, more intense looking and not every scene has the same set of actions. (Some girls get more spanking, some are tied to a big X wooden cross, some spend more time in the cage etc. ) For the first time we get directions from the camera-man and the girls speak a bit. It's not much, but it's different from the usual Teencore stuff where the girl walks in and is naked and sucking cock within 30 seconds.
Cons:
- Sadly I fear that they won't update this site anymore. I hope to be wrong but this seems to be another site like cumholics or analyzedgirls or one of the many other sites the network sets up but never uploads to.
-Again no zip files for the images, the photo sets are not very well planned (you get 30 images of the same deepthroat, then a close up of a cock, then another 20-30 images with very slight differences... rather disappointing)
- No choices as to what video size you want. I don't need the super high quality but can't choose something else.
- Navigation of the network is a pain (read my review of the teencorenetwork to see what I mean)
- The interaction between the girls and the male model as well as the camera-man are an improvement in my opinion, but sometimes they are ridiculous. Having a girl who does hardcore on the rest of the site say she's a virgin is a bit weird if you ask me. I guess getting models who speak better English is out of the question...
Bottom Line:
I've been with this network for a long time. I love the models they have and the hardcore action they do. However, even more than the hot girls I used to love the old teach my ass site, mostly because the guy would interact with the models before the actual sex.
I know this is not everyone's cup of tea but what really makes a porno interesting for me is getting to know the model. I want to see her get naked, get ready for the sex scene, I want to get a bit of a connection with the girl before she has a cock in her ass. Call me a romantic :) but I'm the kind of guy who back in the DVD era used to watch the backstage features before the actual sex, just to get an idea of how the girl really is.
That kind of connection with the female models is something that in my opinion always lacked from this network. The girls are incredibly cute, but except for a quick glimpse of her walking out of the room at the end, you never saw the real girl, you just saw the porn actress. Many other Russian sites get around the language barrier by having translators (Woodmancastingx anyone? ) or by having backstage scenes where you can see the girls showering and joking around (21sextury).
Sure, you don't need interviews with the girls or backstage stuff, but it makes the scenes a bit more interesting. And this site has finally got it right (even more than Spermatino, which was supposed to be all about the backstage experience)
Here let me give you and example or two: Seeing Jill naked in a cage ask "what should I do" in broken Russian while looking straight at the camera with gorgeous eyes makes the scene incredible hot in my opinion, much more than any amount of ass pounding can. Or you have Flick look half smiling/ half scared at the cuffs, or Eva smile as she wipes cum of her face... just small moments that remind you that these are real girls, doing incredible hardcore scenes.
Unfortunately we don't only get that, we get the cameraman constantly barking commands like "yes yes, hurry, hurry pet yourself" and breathing heavy into the camera... a more soft handed approach could get the same results. But you know what even with the creepy cameraman this site is one of my favorite on the network because it's different. Every other site is pretty much the same scene only with different girls (now he'll force her to do deepthroat, now she'll do anal, now he does this and that and that... boooring) But they are getting better and this site is a huge step in the right direction.
You have spankings, scenes where you see them lube the girl up or where she fists hereself, more stripping and self petting than any other site on the network. At the end of each scene the girls take a few minutes to wipe the semen off their face and smile to the camera. It all makes the models more real, more human and that makes the whole scene a hell of a lot sexier.
I'd love to see more of this, more backstage, more interviews, more focus on the models. Of course improved web design, better download speeds and maybe an option for streaming. I'd love to see better photo shoots and a bio page for each model showing all the scenes they do across the network. I'd also love a lower price (how the hell does 21 sextury manage to do everything else for a much lower monthly cost?)
Anyway, the site is great and I hope it will continue to update. The network has some incredible models and it's worth checking out, but be ready to deal with some technical issues and some repetitive scenes (although as I said before, they do seem to get better and if I review this network in a year I'm sure I'll have a lot more positive stuff to say. )
Eva, Jill, April, Angela, Flick, Isabel, Andi, Mya, Abby and Kelsie. I think most have appeared on other sites in the network so you can see their faces there. Isabel does some pretty crazy shit (I don't think I have seen so much gape in a while :)
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
