| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
626
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
|
08-18-10 07:55pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
627
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
Did you not look at the home page, which clearly shows which exact sites are part of the network that you will have access to, before joining?
Because they DO make it so confusing, you really need to look at the home pages, because that's where they make it clear what you will get access to and what you won't get access to - and none of those sites appear on the home page of 21Sextury.com.
I suspect that, as others say, all of the content is available on other sites, so the best thing to do is to look for the models that you're interested in while having "all sites" selected. Then you can find the content that you want.
|
08-18-10 07:47pm
|
Reply
628
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
dantheman's Comment
If I remember correctly, I had no problem using DownThemAll with this site when I was a member, though that's been a while now.
|
08-18-10 07:42pm
|
Comment
629
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
08-16-10 09:42pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
630
|
Aletta Ocean Empire
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
As Sevrin suggests, e-mails to the 21 Sextury Support are the best way to clear up confusion about what sites are/are not/will/will not be part of networks. They're pretty responsive.
Or you can just look closely at the home pages, which are actually pretty complete and accurate.
This site is not part of the network grouping that one gets access to by joining 21Sextury.com or PixAndVideo or Club Sandy - all of which give you access to the same group of sites.
In order to get this site's material, you have to join this site. You would then get access to the bonus sites that are all clearly listed on Aletta Ocean Empire's home page.
I've got to say that - while this site is nowhere promised to people joining 21Sextury.com, it certainly doesn't lessen the confusion when the pic on that site's homepage enticing people to the "Amazing Offer" to join 21Sextury.com is none other than Aletta Ocean.
|
08-15-10 07:38am
|
Reply
631
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
lone59's Comment
This site's been working just fine for me - no notice-able problems at all.
|
08-12-10 05:48am
|
Reply
632
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Sevrin's Reply
They specialize in crazy insertions and weird sex-toys. Frankly, they're my favorite porn site and I don't care for that stuff much either. I think they're great because they have great models and shoot them spectacularly well and show their personalities and their models clearly enjoy working for them (though I've heard from models that working for ALS Scan is much harder work than it is for most sites), and they get the best out of their models. Their girl/girl stuff is awesome. They have really fun and unique BTS stuff. You don't need to be all into the crazy insertions to love this site, that's for sure.
|
08-10-10 06:06pm
|
Reply
633
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
That would make complete sense for Zoliboy to be there. He's worked as a Production Assistant to Sandy for years, and Sandy is Alex's agent when he's working in her neck of the woods, so you're eyes are holding up well.
In terms of re-mastering photos, I don't know how much more ALS is going to be doing of that, because Alex has said that it just doesn't work out for them financially. They don't get many members off of their remastering of photos, he said a short time ago, and since it's quite time consuming and expensive, they aren't going to make it any priority. I recommend e-mailing for more specific info about stuff that you're particularly interested in - this was info in one of the Director's blogs.
|
08-10-10 04:21am
|
Reply
634
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've seen sites where the webmasters lay out their hatred for IE and encourage people to use Firefox and I've seen sites where the webmasters say that anything prior to IE is not going to work well.
Like with most things, so long as the webmasters are being honest and informative, I'm fine with it.
|
08-09-10 05:48pm
|
Reply
635
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I said "sometimes". The real question is "How does the material look?" If the censoring makes the material look like redacted FBI documents, well, then I'm not going to find it so exciting. If the material looks awesome even with the censoring, then I might be further intrigued by the site.
|
08-05-10 06:40am
|
Comment
636
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
|
08-03-10 08:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
637
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This site is one of the often-missed jewels of this network, in my opinion. I've never found Sapphic Erotic to be an exciting girl/girl site. This site is much more fun and charming and erotic than that one. It can't compete on the number of updates, but I think the updates here are superior to the updates at Sapphic Erotic - and you get the rest of the 21st Sextury network as well.
|
08-03-10 04:25pm
|
Reply
638
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The first membership I had to Nubiles.net, I found the site to be a let-down because the models looked bored to tears in many of their photo sets. They addressed that issue and their work now shows a high level of engagement from the models. I'm not saying that they should have a plastered-on smile in every photo - in fact, I feel like the model Aaliyah Love ruins a lot of her work by having the incessant huge grin. Any expression maintained at all times seems phony to me.
So while I can't say that a female adult model or porn babe needs to look like she is having the time of her life, I want to see her connecting with the experience and I don't want her to look like she's grimly bearing it.
|
08-03-10 04:17pm
|
Reply
639
|
Andi Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
RealMayer's Comment
That's cool - I had wondered what happened to her new site. Ariel Rebel used to have links to her blog, and didn't the last time I was checking out Ariel's blog, so I figured that Andi might have decided not to do another site. It's good that the new site will be more "the real Andi". The old one had her hemmed into that barely legal thing in an unchanging way that reminded me of comic strips like Family Picnic where the characters never age.
|
08-01-10 08:59pm
|
Reply
640
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
If you like the fairly straight-ahead, lightly treated pics at Karups, you might find yourself VERY frustrated by the overly-treated, "let's just pour lacquer over them" pics at Earl Miller. I sure was!
I didn't see one face that wasn't blurred and I didn't find one trace of skin tone in any pics on his site. He shoots a lot of gorgeous women, but the excessive treatment on the pics totally ruined them for me.
|
08-01-10 07:39am
|
Reply
641
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
On the lack of diversity - they have said before that Karups PC is a collection of European models, where Karups HA is a collection of models from the US, so you wouldn't really expect a great deal of diversity from a site that had the parameters that this one does.
I think, though, that the bigger problem with the Karups sites is the same-ness of the style from model to model from set to set.
ATK does much better in this regard, in my opinion. Their different content providers have notice-ably different styles from each other, so you can do searches by a particular photographer/studio if you want more of that particular style.
All that being said, there's a lot to like at both Karups PC and Karups HA.
|
07-31-10 04:43pm
|
Reply
642
|
AV Lovers
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom22's Comment
Perhaps they put the huge logo - and I've never seen anything from this site to know how big the logo is - to make it easier to identify pirated material and to take legal action. If it's got a big-ass AV Lovers logo, nobody could claim that they didn't know that it was AV Lovers material.
|
07-31-10 04:37pm
|
Reply
643
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
It's odd - it's very odd - and they've got a comment dated the middle of July 2010 saying "no updates in over a month" while the review dated 7/30 talks about "updates every day".
Meanwhile this is a network that has shed entire sites worth of material, such as "Sleep Creep" - I'm sure that's not the only one because I've been intrigued in the last year by samples up and around - when I've investigated, there's no sign that material is part of this site/network any longer.
|
07-30-10 09:54pm
|
Comment
644
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
|
07-30-10 02:11pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
645
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Megan Mallone's Vivid scenes directed by B Skow are some of the best POV stuff I've seen anywhere - surprisingly good.
Lots of great stuff on the Evil Angel Premium Channel including awesome Jay Sinn material.
|
07-29-10 06:30am
|
Comment
646
|
Nikki Sims
(0)
|
|
07-28-10 06:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
647
|
Bryci
(0)
|
|
07-28-10 06:41pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
648
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I just think it was good Customer Service. I don't know what they would have pangs of conscience about. The original deal was one that I agreed to, have never had reasons to regret. The fact that they changed their pricing model is not anything unique to this site - lots of others have done similarly.
The new deal makes me happy, so there we go.
|
07-28-10 05:33pm
|
Reply
649
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Different sites have different set-ups. Some sites have forums where they are happy to hear about what material you particularly like, but will get rather irritated if you post about problems with the site. So then you've got a line drawn about "praise here - problems there". As Drooler says, ALS Scan is a unique site in that the owner/webmaster truly wants to hear from the site's members and will often respond directly and will encourage more direct feedback.
I've experienced a range of feedback from sites that I've had issues with and, overall, the surly/negative/crappy C/S/webmaster responses are in the minimum. Most sites that I've joined are smart enough to give at least decent C/S.
Given the state of the economy, I have to conclude that sites that don't give good C/S or give surly responses or flat-out lie about "it was your fault" are fucking idiots. They would have to be posting unbelievably arousing stuff to get me to join their sites again and sites that have fucking idiots as their C/S/webmasters rarely are.
|
07-28-10 06:30am
|
Comment
650
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
07-27-10 05:49pm
Replies (2)
|
