Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Comment
I agree, Mr Fountain. I was a member here a few years back and even then it was a good site, and virtually a steal for the 10.00 USD it cost me at that time. Been meaning to re-join.
|
11-11-08 03:04pm
|
Reply
127
|
Panty Amateur
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Hi Denner,
I'm glad my review helped in causing at least one person to join this site, and I'm even more glad that you are not regreting your choice.
As I said somewhere, I think this is the best panty-video site on the net, easily. A new vid every single day, and in hi-def. No music tracks, intimate settings, good camera work, good looking models, great undies. I am always watching and re-watching these videos.
I am not currently subscribed because the newest vids are of such high quality my pc can't play them. I get a choppy picture that halts and pauses and sometimes freezes up my machine. RATS!
Must upgrade video-card, or something.
I was really happy to see your comment, Denner.
|
11-07-08 05:15pm
|
Reply
128
|
Teen Stars Magazine
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
Agreed. The vids are useless but the pictures are top-notch, and the girls are beautiful. A good pic archive.
|
11-05-08 09:32pm
|
Reply
129
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Hi Jeff,
I went through my first folder and didn't find any. Bear in mind, I have hundreds of zips, so this might take a while. I know I only downloaded a few since I generally peruse the set before taking the zip and when I found one of those, by and large I opted not to DL.
Until I rummage a few up, it might help if I tell you that these doubled sets - at least the ones I saw - ALL occurred in the old pages. I spent almost all my time in the regular amatuers section and athletic amateurs. I worked my way from oldest to newer since I prefer the style of the old sets (I'm an old-school undies fan). I don't recall any in exotics, and I never looked at outdoors, nor any hardcore.
Bear in mind, I wrote the initial comment in regard to this out of curiosity mainly and as a heads-up to you. It wasn't that big of a deal. As you can see by my review, basically your site is tops and I will be rejoining again in a few months to go through the newer stuff.
I will email with info when I can. Hopefully fairly soon.
|
10-29-08 10:07pm
|
Reply
130
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the quick reply. I will send you some of the set-names after I've located them, but I won't be able to send an URL because my sub has run out. **NOT fishing for any freebies here, either, nor would I accept any if offered. I'm weird about that sort of thing. Not that you would do that any way. I mention it just as an FYI.
|
10-28-08 01:45pm
|
Reply
131
|
XX Cel
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Wow, Toadsith, you sure made an excellent case for your point of view. I would reply by saying first that I don't find a pregnant woman sexy necessarily: rather, I find a woman who is sexy already *even more* sexy when she is pregnant. Case in point: my little ex-wife. She was busty for such a slight little thing anyway (four foot eight inches, 85 lbs when I married her), and when she became pregnant...DAMN! It wasn't just the size, it was the texture, the density, the color of the areolae, everything. I was in hog heaven. The rest of her perfect little body became more exciting to me as well. Even her hair. Her skin and her face were more lustrous, rich, supple, smooth, choose your modifier. Sex was hot. And I mean literally hot.
My attraction to pregnant women has nothing to do with the "miracle of child birth" or anything like that. I'm not green, I'm not politically correct, and I detest the nuttier elements of the feminist movement as much as the next guy. That being said I don't find anything grotesque about reproduction or the physical changes women undergo when they are with child. Of course I speak from the male perspective, which is an easy one. I can sympathize as best I can, however, and I completely and without reservation support and commend any woman who refuses to become a mother, for whatever reason. I'm pretty much a libertarian and believe quite forcefully that a person holds sovereignty over their own body and that the demands of society, culture, and invisible deities can go fly a kite.
The beauty of the feminine form, for me, is about a particular concert of curves, contours, and convexities: the breasts, the hips, you know what I mean. In a pregnant woman, and by that I mean one who takes care of herself, those curves, contours, and convexities are accentuated in a dramatic and often breathtaking manner. The big belly, far from being a gravid lump of shapeless fat, is round and hard and smooth and sexy as hell. Once again, this is strictly from an onlooker's point of view and I don't mean for one second to underestimate the physical and emotional strain a pregnancy puts upon a woman.
Parasite may be a technically apt term as you use it, but as a father of two I can say that I am now as dependent on my children for my well-being as they are on me. If one of them died I would want to die too, and so the host/parasite relationship doesn't fly with me. Naturally it does apply to many a parent and child in this world, and our species as a whole would most certainly benefit greatly from a concerted effort to significantly reduce the number of childbirths worldwide.
Edited to add: I think this might call for a forum thread. I'm interested to hear what others think. I think I'll go start one.
|
10-17-08 10:33pm
|
Reply
132
|
XX Cel
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
The watermark is pretty big. I actually never heard of the site until a few weeks ago. Oh, and I should say, while Cel uses landscape more than the average site, on going through the pics I'd say he still uses it much less than half the time.
|
10-17-08 08:07pm
|
Reply
133
|
The Hand Job Site
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Thanks for the great review.
The HJ niche seems to be growing, which is odd given that most guys seem to regard a hand-job as something less than sex. To my mind, a good HJ is one of the damn nicest things a girl can do for a guy, and when you get a girl who knows how to do it, it can really be something.
Wifey from Wifey's World is the reigning queen of the HJ, in my opinion, and everyone else pales by comparison. I've been to several HJ sites and most of them are useless. Brandi Belle is pretty good, but she seems too detatched.
And, dang it, if there's a mouth or even a tongue involved, it ain't a handjob!
Anyway, just my .02$
|
10-17-08 04:42pm
|
Reply
134
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, but not a lot.
Melissa Joan Hart has a beautiful ass.
|
08-03-08 11:04pm
|
Reply
135
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I got tired of hardcore porn years ago, but I still try once in a while to rekindle the interest I had as a strapping young buck. I recently got a sub at VideoBox and downloaded a video featuring one of my dreamgirls, Alexis Love, being monotonously drilled for about ten minutes. It looked mechanical, visceral, purely physical. There was no spark, no passion, no eroticism at all. It was like watching an oil-rig. What's worse: it didn't look like it FELT GOOD. How can I explain that? it looked like an oil-rig. I didn't think to myself, wow, this dude is one lucky bastard! I was simply bored silly.
I could give myself blueballs watching porn twenty years ago. At my present age, and after a lot more actual experience in the field, there has to be some kind of mental relationship going on between characters in a story or performers in a film. It can't simply rely on the physical. There has to be some context, some backdrop, some REASON these two so and so's are bumping uglies. There has to be some desire for the other, not just a desire to get off. I guess for this reason I am much more into erotic literature at this point in my life than adult film or video. I'm currently reading Kate Chopin's "The Awakening" and there was more stimulation for me in one scene describing a single kiss than there was in watching an hour of VideoBox downloads.
That being said, I'm sure there's a lot of good porn out there that I've simply missed and/or can't seem to find. I'll keep looking.
PS: If by "porn" we mean looking at beautiful women naked, then I have never gotten sick of that. A bit bored at times, but never sick.
|
07-31-08 12:26am
|
Reply
136
|
Wifey's World
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks, Khan, I'll do that. roseman, you're welcome.
|
07-30-08 01:19am
|
Reply
137
|
Wifey's World
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
Nice review, roseman. That last trust vote was mine. I don't know why it says anonymous. I could swear the 'vote anonymously" box was unchecked.
|
07-29-08 04:22pm
|
Reply
138
|
Panty Amateur
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hi messmer,
I think I said "no download options", meaning you can only DL one way. That's my fault, bad wording there.
All videos (and there are over a thousand now) average about five minutes and are each downloadble in a single mpeg file. The quality is excellent and they have been moving into hi-def over the past few months. I can't even watch the new ones because my pc can't handle it and the replay is all choppy. Even the oldest vids are high quality and look great fullscreen on my 22" monitor, though I have to mention I'm not an afficianado in technical matters. This is the best panty-video site I know of. Bear in mind, this is a British site and the Brits tend to be old school (full-backs) when it comes to knickers, though the emphasis is not on cotton. Also very few thongs or boyshorts here. There is no graphic nudity though the girls do get into their birthday suits from time to time and bare breasts abound. There is some masturbation and lesbian content but the emphasis is heavily on solo tease.
|
07-18-08 02:51pm
|
Reply
139
|
Oh La La Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Ok, UK Upskirts links to both sites, to UK Upskirts if you hold the mouse over the UK part, and to Upskirts if you hold the mouse over the Upskirts part. Same thing with the Amateur Upskirts link.
Very strange. Or my computer is going crazy. Or I'm an idiot. Is this normal for links to function this way?
|
07-14-08 10:58pm
|
Reply
140
|
Oh La La Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Here's the link to the UK Up-skirts site
https://www.pornusers.com/review/ukupskirts/
|
07-14-08 10:45pm
|
Reply
141
|
Oh La La Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
Hi messmer,
I can't think of anything off the top of my head that would fit the bill.
UK Upskirts, as well as most of the sites from that company, has very high quality videos, but there is no nudity. Also the pics are smallish. Amateur Upskirts has plenty of nudity but is heavy on the cotton, which I know you don't like, and the last time I was there the vids were just not up to par quality-wise and the pics were tiny. Panties Pulled Down is not upskirt-focused but has lots of upskirt material and plenty of nudity, but while the Quicktime vids are top-notch quality-wise the content is masturbation-obssessed and hence boring to me. And the pics there are great but are just too small to get excited about. LV Panty has big, HQ pic sets which you might like, as they always end in nudity and are not fixated on cotton, but the vid section is less than mediocre, or at least it was the last time I checked.
Like you, I have a next to impossible time finding stuff that is completely up my alley. Good luck hunting!
Edited: the site UK Upskirts links to IS NOT UK Upskirts....
https://www.pornusers.com/review/ukupskirts/
|
07-14-08 10:38pm
|
Reply
142
|
Tawnee Stone
(0)
|
Reply of
silver's Review
I've been wanting to join Lightspeed World for some time, as I'm an avid pic collector and am mainly into softcore, with emphasis on soft; but 800x600 is just too small. The bigger your monitor gets, the higher res your screen gets, and consequently, 800x600 looks puny.
|
06-03-08 10:22pm
|
Reply
143
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
Thaeral's Comment
Okay, this is strange. I went back to the site, clicked member's entrance, and got the member's page without a prompt. However, when I went to download a video, I got the prompt. Twice.
It's got to be some technical problem. No one who wanted to make money would do this stuff on purpose.
|
05-15-08 11:05pm
|
Reply
144
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
Thaeral's Comment
I just signed up and the same thing happened. Can't log in after paying my money. Sent off email. Will see what happens.
If I get no response, boy will there ever be hard feelings.
|
05-15-08 10:57pm
|
Reply
145
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
I tried the trial here and I've seen the preview vids, so I can say that it certainly looks as if this girl knows EXACTLY what she's doing, even though what she does will not cater to everyone's taste. She reminds me a little of Wifey from Wifey's World, not in her appearance, but in the way she does her thing. I'd gladly be putty in her hands. I'm about to take the plunge, I think. Thanks for the comment, jd1961.
|
05-15-08 10:19pm
|
Reply
146
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Good review. I might check it out in the future.
|
05-08-08 05:55pm
|
Reply
147
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mrcallen's Poll
Hell no. Couldn't.
|
05-05-08 04:34pm
|
Reply
148
|
Flower Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Thanks for the review, ace. I'm hard-wired to respond to the word "panties" like one of Pavlov's dogs, and I've been semi-tempted to try this place out. I'll probably ignore it for a good while now, before the word "panties" brings me salivating back...
WWW
**by the way, it's what's in the panties that counts, not the panties all by themselves. I don't huff them or wear them (OK, one time, when I was very drunk). Men in panties is a travesty! Nor do I hang around playgrounds in Highgate looking for Cross-eyed Mary! ;)
18+ please.
|
04-24-08 10:40pm
|
Reply
149
|
Gagging Whores
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Review
I retract what I said above. I sometimes forget that some women are actually into this kind of thing. As long as everyone's an adult and it's all consensual than my "sickening" comment doesn't apply. Thanks for the review, Lionheart, and apologies.
WWW
|
04-23-08 09:09pm
|
Reply
150
|
Sexxxy Celeste
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I know these are old comments, but I'm shopping around for a good NN site and saw this. I agree, Denner. It should be general practice just to avoid sites that won't give any stats as to the volume of material they have or the quality thereof, or specs for pics and vids. If they can't do that there is probably something they are hiding, like a lack of quantity and/or quality.
If you have high quantity, you'll use it as a selling point; if you have high quality, you'll use it as a selling point; if you have both, obviously you'll let us know.
|
04-22-08 07:51pm
|
|
