| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
926
|
N/A
|
Reply of
slategrey's Reply
I might but I suspect that I stay away from any site that has words like hairy and/or hirsute in them. The only time I care about hairy in connection with women is when they are talking about pubic hair.
I'm from the generation when women had pubic hair and not necessarily
just a little trim so I still enjoy that type of pubic hair.
|
04-02-12 06:09am
|
Reply
927
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I had to pick undecided because I either don't pay attention about that or I haven't seen any.
|
03-31-12 09:13am
|
Reply
928
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
My favorite girl only content is hardcore with toys/strapon or midcore lez action but there must be a lot of passionate kissing, great breast play and amazing cunnilingus.
|
03-29-12 11:32am
|
Reply
929
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It is but that somehow hasn't stopped mainstream industries from including a greater porny look and feel to many of their products and in the case od media thena greater porn look to their shows and movies.
|
03-27-12 06:42am
|
Reply
930
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I've developed a rule when it comes to a site's preview section and what you'll ultimately find inside. If a site has a very good preview section then the content is likely to be as good if not better. If a site has a poor preview section then it's likely that the content will also be poor to awful. If it has a tiny preview section or no preview section at all then stay away. You might pass up on a great find but you're more likely to lose your money on a piece of crap.
|
03-25-12 08:00am
|
Reply
931
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'll second Capn's comment. If I'm using IE then the download manager is standard and when I'm using Firefox then I still use Download Them All but in both cases the number of files is rarely more than one or two maximum.
|
03-23-12 06:31am
|
Reply
932
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I picked other but any of the first 3 are the main reasons why I visit and participate at PU.
|
03-21-12 11:00am
|
Reply
933
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
The first thing is the preview section because new sites usually don't have any reviews so unless I can see what's available inside then I won't bother joining for any amount. The second most important thing is the quantity of videos and/or pics. The price is rarely an issue for me because
if I find the price too high then it won`t really matter the quantity of quality of the content because I won`t want to pay this.
|
03-20-12 06:52am
|
Reply
934
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think I'll be signing a lot less simply because I'm finding less stuff that I like and the sites that I keep track of are updating less often with stuff that I want. The recession has seriously hurt the porn industry and all those torrents sites didn't help.
|
03-18-12 09:13am
|
Reply
935
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I do the same thing like jberryl69.
|
03-15-12 10:06am
|
Reply
936
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I chose mature because this is a niche that seems to be slowly disapearing.
|
03-13-12 12:01pm
|
Reply
937
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I'm with Cybertoad on this one...HUH???
|
03-11-12 09:13am
|
Reply
938
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I don't have any but that could be because I've always stuck with the big ones and/or I have never had one of the stated problems with any of the ones I joined.
|
03-09-12 07:01am
|
Reply
939
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think that 2 days is fine.
|
03-07-12 08:29am
|
Reply
940
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I'm not sure but I would suspect that there is more than one reason why they do. I do know that Dana Dearmond defended Nacho on another forum when a few posters started talking about his mysoginistic attitude toward female perfomers. She saying that it's an act and that he's not like that on set and yet in a later thread she bashed him for scene they shot together where she didn't appreciate the way he treated her.
|
03-05-12 10:54am
|
Reply
941
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I agree with graymane that it's many times rather than a few. That's saying a lot when you consider that I'm a huge fan of hardcore porn.
|
03-05-12 07:25am
|
Reply
942
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
There are some credible rumours that Timo is in fact a huge jerk so it's no surpsiee that he would be on screen what he is off screen.
I've enjoyed many Rocco Siffredi movies in my life but he sometimes comes off as one hell of a jerk in his movies and don't get me started with Nacho Vidal.
|
03-05-12 07:19am
|
Reply
943
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I guess this makes me a kind of hypocrite but I'd be more likely to discourage a girl from getting into porn than helping her. It's no big secret that I like porn and it's a quick way to make some pretty large sums of money for what amounts to a few hours of work but the industry eats and spits out girls at an alarming rate. The number of girls that truly undertand everything that doing porn entails is insignificant comapred to those that think there's nothing to it.
|
03-03-12 09:44am
|
Reply
944
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As long as the sites is 30$ or less then I don't think the cost should be an issue. The reason why I say that is that I've joined sites that were 25$ and I only downloaded a couple of videos while I joined sites there 30$ and I downloaded a ton of content.
I've only used the price as a factor a couple of times. I know I gave the Ferro network a much lower score because I found the content in no way justified the huge cost of membership.
|
03-01-12 09:54am
|
Reply
945
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
The majority of US performers get to choose the name a site must use. There are exceptions but I find that it's normally with girls doing their first appearance in porn. We know That's not the same thing with Eastern European models because they almost always have multiple names.
|
02-28-12 11:11am
|
Reply
946
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
This is one of those questions that is likely to be more on one side than the other based on your age. I agree that todays technology is superior to what they had over a decade or more ago but the people behind the camera today don't come to the ankles of the guys from the past.
There are very few companies that still shoot porn on a regular basis and even less that shoot stuff that I truly enjoy. I often mention how much I miss the movies made in the 70's and 80's because the sex was often badly shot and too dark for my taste but there was a certain desire to appear as though the people in the movies were having real sex rather than demonstrating their abilty to insert objects in their various orrifice.
|
02-26-12 10:12am
|
Reply
947
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I make a huge distiction betwen a girl under 12 and a 14 to 17 years old girl. I'm from Quebec so we are probably as close to European in attitude as you can get in North America so I have no issue with nudity per say but a topless 10 to 12 years old girl is not the same as a topless 14 to 17 years old girl. The way girl bodies change these days. It's not uncommon for 14 years old to have some pretty decent sized breast so that exposing them in public is just asking for trouble. This gets worse as the girls get older and start to look older and older.
I don't know how it is in Europe but over-sexualising children and teens is starting to be a big problem in North America. I'd hate to have to add topless teens to this equation. I'd also like to add that I'm not overly thrilled to see topless young men in places where they shouldn't be.
|
02-25-12 09:50am
|
Reply
948
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't think women should be allowed topless in the same places where guys are allowed. Call me a prude but I don't want to go to the waterpark with my nephews and have a bunch of topless women all over the place. I already have a problem with some of the bathing suits girls wear.
Another problem is in regards to age. Would you allow underage girls to also be topless and if they can't then how are you going to police this?
I know I don't carry any identification when I'm in a waterpark or a beach.
|
02-24-12 11:01am
|
Reply
949
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I put technically because people really make a diffeence when it comes to porn. Gay is guys with guys while lesbian is girls with girls. I'm not sure where they put tranny porn.
|
02-22-12 06:05pm
|
Reply
950
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I picked no because I assume that the question is only considering gay porn to be guy on guy action and doesn't include lesbian porn. Technically speaking lesbian porn is still gay porn.
I've joined one tranny site but I only wanted the videos of the tranny with girls so I don't think that's gay porn but I guess it could be considered borderline.
|
02-22-12 08:22am
|
