| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
751
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I agree their tour is pretty poor. Not sure why they don't let you see all the models, I feel like they used to in the old version of the site. I think it is a decent place, especially for the price, but I didn't like their new site design - it was faster, than the slow ass old one but still sort of glitchy. Also, updates are slow, so I wouldn't antipate hanging around for long.
|
12-05-11 10:35pm
|
Reply
752
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
Belthazar's Reply
Hopefully they will replace all those soon. Funny shit.
|
08-09-11 12:41pm
|
Reply
753
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
Belthazar's Review
Nice review, I totally agree with you that it is a decent site but needs some work. Did you get any of those videos with a wicked watermark in the middle of the screen? Very odd.
|
08-07-11 12:09am
|
Reply
754
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I think they've had sound sync problems for a while, I didn't even notice when I was a member some time ago (since I often don't listen to the audio), but I do have several videos that have some audio sync issues.
Did they go back and re-encode all their really old material to 1080x720, or just take it off the site in order to meet that claim? I actually thought their 640x480 mp4 was pretty decent considering the size (from a video perspective)...
|
03-18-11 01:34am
|
Reply
755
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Curious, I wonder what the problem is. When I was a member about a year ago I had no problems downloading - I have at least 50 scenes on one of my externals, and I don't recall ever experiencing any problems. Perhaps they just don't have the server capacity to meet demand. Does streaming work well, or is there a ton of load time, lag, etc.?
|
12-23-10 10:55pm
|
Reply
756
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Yeah, with the downloads it is definitely a pretty good value. I found the site navigation to be quite annoying when I was a member, and I agree that some videos were glitchy - although I'd say most of the scenes I downloaded were decent quality with no major glitches. I went back and watched a few, and didn't notice any audio sync problems, so perhaps it was just that one scene or movie?
|
12-19-10 11:39pm
|
Reply
757
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Do you mean there are no downloads at all PinkPanther, or no downloads of newer videos? When I was a member practically everything was downloadable, most of the newer stuff downloadable in HD. It'd be a shame if they got rid of that feature...
|
12-18-10 04:44pm
|
Reply
758
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
I had the same problem when I was a member. Usually it was better during certain times of the day, I think they just don't have the bandwidth to meet demand.
|
07-08-10 01:34pm
|
Reply
759
|
Wicked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nastyboy7's Comment
I totally agree with you, I really enjoy Wicked content, although the site itself (navigation, etc) wasn't all that great the last time I was there, and their preview blows. But still, one of the few sites I join yearly.
|
08-26-12 12:32am
|
Reply
760
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Nice review dracken, I totally agree with your feelings on the HC scenes that feature pierre (I find them to be very subpar), although he does have some non-tripod stuff (with other men) which is pretty well shot. He definitely gets some of the hottest euro ladies around. I'm not sure why wake up and fuck isn't a part of this site, it is tiny, and overall pretty worthless as a standalone.
|
07-08-12 10:46pm
|
Reply
761
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Yeah, six months would be an aweful long time to hold onto a membership to his site given the price. He does update his normal site pretty regularly, but still that is a bit much.
|
05-22-11 10:22pm
|
Reply
762
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
yeah looking back at my review it does seem a bit negative given the score, I was mainly trying to point out all the flaws, as this place certainly has its problems.
I did enjoy the site, there were just many scenes where after it downloaded I looked at it and was like, what the fuck is this? I guess I am just willing to overlook the bad for the good in this case...
|
10-08-10 11:57pm
|
Reply
763
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Hey man, a site like this is kind of difficult to review. On one hand they have some excellent content, but then there are other scenes that are pretty big "misses". I am personally a fan of castings with interviews and stuff before the model gets naked, so that is probably why I scored the site so high even though the content is pretty variable. He definitely gets some attractive models, it is just too bad that a lot of the hardcore castings are single-camera on a tripod type deals, although that it pretty much what I expected.
|
10-07-10 11:08pm
|
Reply
764
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for the info!
|
09-27-10 09:59pm
|
Reply
765
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
Sorry for the very slow response, haven't logged in here in quite a while.
There are a bunch of these sites that have similar content - allfinegirls (used to be 18only, changed their name) and wowgirls/porn, but they typically don't actually have overlapping content (just same girls), sometimes the photoset will be on one site and the video on the other, but they seem to have gotten better about that. They also apparently have a new site, ultrafilms which looks very similar in general to the other two.
Some of the content is also not unique to the site, you can find some of it on the typical euro sites.
|
01-25-18 03:30pm
|
Reply
766
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
It was a prechecked cross sale for me
|
03-26-17 05:27pm
|
Reply
767
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Once again, thanks for the info lk2, it may be that they are being lazy with the preview page on Wow Porn, but as a few examples they have posted (these all had the same setting, model, outfits, and scene name as ones I downloaded last year from Wow Girls):
Anjelica "Save Me"
Momoko "Tight Snatch Hunter"
Angela Pamona "Dream of any straight man"
Bianca "Toys are fun"
Luiza Pamona "lovely threesome"
These are just a few I noticed, perhaps it was just stuff they put in to get the site going or their preview page is wrong, I can't really tell if the newer stuff overlaps (not trying to be combative, was mainly just curious if Wow Porn really added much value).
|
02-09-13 12:12pm
|
Reply
768
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the info,
Odd since several of the preview pictures are of scenes I am almost certain I already have, perhaps it is just edited differently ala DDF or just so happens to be same model/furniture/location.
|
02-08-13 09:58pm
|
Reply
769
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the info lk2, I just meant from looking at the previews of the site a lot of the content on Wow Porn looked like content that was already on Wow Girls.
|
02-05-13 06:35pm
|
Reply
770
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Great review lk2,
I agree it is a very good site. Any opinions on Wow Porn, seems to mostly just be mostly the b/g type material right from Wow Girls? Perhaps just cause it is a new site...
|
02-04-13 04:14pm
|
Reply
771
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Thanks for the info tangub, never look in my junk email folder often enough!
|
02-04-13 02:18pm
|
Reply
772
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Capn,
I agree it is somewhat of a heartcore site, but I think the best example of that genre would be X-Art, at least in my opinion. This site still has some typical euro porn elements, but I would still clasify it as heartcore, just not the prototypical heartcore site.
Either way, I don't think it is a site you would enjoy, being well aware of what you are looking for in a site.
|
09-03-12 12:03am
|
Reply
773
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Yes, Khan, you are correct. I was going to link to it but got distracted by my nutball dog. Thanks for your assistance.
|
08-29-12 11:50pm
|
Reply
774
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I agree, hopefully they will stay around a while, and hopefully they don't devolve into more gonzo style crap.
|
08-28-12 10:59pm
|
Reply
775
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
There was a forum thread a couple of years ago on what to include in a good review, I usually just follow that as a guideline. I'll try and search for it and bump it to the top of the forum posts. It has been very helpful for me. From my perspective on this site, I find it more important to be subjective rather than objective. I don't pretend to be a good reviewer, thus all I can voice is my opinions (along with some useful facts).
|
08-28-12 10:38pm
|
