| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Needless to say, there aren't too many of my friends who know about my 'hobby' in Toronto but a few do. None of them judge me for it and two of them want all the details I can muster. And while this is always intended as a brag, I close every story with 'when's the last time you had sex with a stunningly beautiful woman less than half your age'? I should point out that I'm 50 so there is nothing illegal going on.
If you ever find yourself in Toronto you should indulge. I note that you and I are similar in age and remember, you're only as old as the woman you feel!
Dammit... I have to find a reason to go to Toronto again soon...
|
05-07-17 12:58pm
|
Reply
2
|
Lesbian Girl On Girl
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Thanks for the positive words.
I was afraid I was letting my personal bias flavor the review too much.
But the site criticism is justified: why have a site with only 8 videos?
Unless those videos are truly exceptional, which these are not.
|
05-25-16 12:27am
|
Reply
3
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MikeC:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Hi Wee,
I checked a handful of recent vids and I did not find any music on any of the scenes.
Based on the scenes I watched (on OnlyTease, OnlySilkAndSatin, OnlySecretaries ), they all follow a similar format; the performer introduces themself and then begins teasing/stripping in silence, the sound of their movements the only soundtrack to the proceedings.
It is possible that very early scenes have music, but it does not appear to be on any of the more recent updates.
|
10-26-15 11:35am
|
Reply
4
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment from WeeWillyWinky:
Nevermind. I see it's Epoch, not CCBill. No dice. :(
|
10-15-15 05:26pm
|
Reply
5
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from lk2fireone:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
I'm on a very tight budget myself, or I would be if I had more financial self-discipline.
I'm aware that because of the internet, the prices for wonderful porn are far cheaper than what the prices were 20 or 30 or 40 years ago.
But still, having a limited amount of cash to pay for porn, as is true for most people, the cost for each site has to be considered. Along with, the quality of the site: site content, site ease of use, and other factors you consider when deciding whether to join a site or not.
Basically, it comes down to: is the site membership worth the cost?
So I think that it makes sense to write that $30/month for FTV is expensive, compared to other sites that are $20/month, that offer a large amount of professional photo sets of lovely young models.
I'm not saying that FTV is a waste of money.
FTV is an excellent site.
I am saying that I would rather spend less money for access to other excellent sites: photo sites like Metart, MPL studios, Femjoy.
Or video/photo sites like X-art. Or Teen Mega World (not a photo site, but massive amount of hardcore teen videos with a huge amount of attractive models).
|
09-18-15 07:11am
|
Reply
6
|
Swimsuit Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from alan19851:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Indeed most of the videos have a pretty electro-techno music track. I just watch them on mute though.
|
09-17-15 08:04pm
|
Reply
7
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from mbaya:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
I can see that I did not make my point clear. Tease is a feeling of anticipation that increases as you watch the video. My complaint is that it is too long on useless slow moving filler. Nearly a half hour to finally get to topless is not tease, it is boring. That is basically how I feel about the gynecological overload. I expect some, as advertised, but they overdo it to the point of my losing interest.
I would not like music either, but the videos nearly always have no sound at all. Combined with a lot of visual filler, that is not so great.
I think we are in basic agreement here.
|
09-15-15 06:24pm
|
Reply
8
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from mbaya:
I love this site and think it is one of the best. I wrote a review six years ago and gave it an 85, but I think that now I would go to 95. It is so huge and the models, camera work and just overall class set it apart from any competition.
That being said, it has some flaws. It is too serious and slow paced. The videos seem to miss tease for example. After twenty minutes of slow motion stripping, you get about two minutes of interesting action.
Where is the sense of fun, or of not knowing what to expect next? There is not much buildup. When you get visuals of the models best parts, you get them in spades, but twenty minutes or a half hour is a bit of an overload, even clinical. This can get to be too much of a class in gynecology.
I think that your point is basically the same as what I just said, just stated differently.
|
09-15-15 05:46am
|
Reply
9
|
G Queen
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from smegma11:
AGREE BUT I COULD NOT EVEN ACCESS MOVIES AT ALL
A COMPLETE RIP OFF
SITE SHOULD BE AVOIDED
|
08-08-15 04:13pm
|
Reply
10
|
Downblouse Loving
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from Monahan:
Hi Wee Willy,
Just discovered this site so I went to TBP & PU for an evaluation. TBP is reasonably high on this site so I'd like any comments from you before I sign up for a month.
Thanks.
Jack
|
05-31-13 02:14pm
|
Reply
11
|
Fame Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from graymane:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Glad to see you were so impressed, WWW.
"the tour" alone of this site doesn't even scratch the surface. You must see these girls from an earlier time, and follow them to where they are now......all done in shoots sans the nudity but so erotically charged they'll bring you right up out of your chair.
For that, one should first go to the archives site.
Ella is my favorite, and to tell you the truth, I'm so damned obsessed with her images that I'll take whatever chances necessary to find and download her updates..... and I do.
I'm exactly like you about the spoils engendered when everything comes off.... the mystique is flushed down the john and one appetite for that subject is foregone and satiated.
These gals have found whatever magic is necessary to continue their sets "creatively covered" and still stoke the scrotum fires and assemble sperms on ready to bale out.
|
09-25-11 06:03pm
|
Reply
12
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from otoh:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
WWW, gosh, I see what you mean - shopping for unmentionables just got a bit more interesting :) And glad to see more full-cut panties around - I'm not quite such a fiend for the full briefs as you - although I do like them and I prefer pretty much anything over a thong!
|
07-19-11 12:56am
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Amen to everything you wrote, www! Except for one thing, but that could be a misconception on my part: When I think of "Granny Panties" I think of those over-sized ones that go up way past the navel. And while I prefer even those to thongs I do like the snug, smaller ones that cling to every curve. :-)
|
06-29-11 06:24pm
|
Reply
14
|
VF Academy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Great review, www. Just disagree with you about the: "Panties tend to be mostly those big, sheer things that you can see right through" as a negative. Those and the more substantial nylon panties made the sites perfect for me and earned them an 82, which I thought was a pretty respectable score for a small network of sites.
Cotton? Preferred?!!! How could you? :-)
|
06-06-11 02:41pm
|
Reply
15
|
VF Academy
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from lk2fireone:
Very thorough review with a nice personal flavor. Agree that cheesy music can be annoying. I like if a model gets off, as long as it looks real or believable. The fake moans and groans are a turn-off.
|
06-04-11 05:15am
|
Reply
16
|
VF Academy
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from otoh:
WWW, great review, thanks - as a panty and nylon enthusiast, this group of sites has been on my list for a while, and has now been bumped up a few places. I also share your disdain for insipid music, so it's good to see a site that avoids it; my main disagreement is that I love anything sheer :)
|
06-04-11 12:37am
|
Reply
17
|
Panties Pulled Down
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review from WeeWillyWinky:
Should have done this long ago, but those initial problems were taken care of and I had no further difficulties with this site. WWW 5/26/11
|
05-26-11 02:18pm
|
Reply
18
|
Panty Amateur
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from S A Web:
Hi WeeWillyWinky,
Thanks for your feedback. We are constantly trying to source new models and agree that perhaps some have less modelling experience than others.
We will focus on the girls speaking a little less as well.
Following some of Denners feedback, we have now added models previews to the site tour so that visitors can see how many videos each girl has and when they were last on the site.
I hope this help somewhat going forwards.
cheers
John
Varietas Services BV
|
05-13-11 07:53am
|
Reply
19
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
LOL. I know, www. That's why I was so tactful and didn't take anything away from the score!
|
01-20-11 06:15pm
|
Reply
20
|
Panties Pulled Down
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review from WeeWillyWinky:
OK now I'm a little miffed. I've come back to the site today and I still can't download the zips. Hmmm... This is silly. They've already got my 30 day sub. Why make it hard for me to get what I want? Silly.
|
09-16-10 04:55pm
|
Reply
21
|
Panties Pulled Down
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from graymane:
I'd be very interested in what you have to say, if and when you do your review on this site.
|
07-22-10 05:16pm
|
Reply
22
|
Panties Pulled Down
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from messmer:
Hurry up, www. I am waiting with bated breath for your review! :-)
|
07-21-10 06:48pm
|
Reply
23
|
Panty Amateur
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from Denner:
TOO BAD!!!!
This was once a great site - sad to get those infos from WeeWilllyWinky - but, WWW - thanks a lot for this update made by a a trusted fellow PU, I appreciate it - and guess I'll skip another join......And you're right: it WAS once: WOW...
AND it's certainly sad, that sites you once favored are loosing it....
|
06-30-10 06:56am
|
Reply
24
|
Graphis
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Capn:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Oh dear....
That doesn't sound good.
Have you tried Ginseng? ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-18-10 03:58pm
|
Reply
25
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
So it is a matter of doing the '90's style 'Pick & Sort' then?
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-18-10 03:54pm
|
