| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
476
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LPee23:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Pissing.com never caught a break in its entire existence. I guess the rocky start to the site was the first warning sign back around 2007. I remember they promoted their content heavily, including on the most popular forum for linking to peeing TGP's at the time. I can't name it here because it is a free site. It was a unique place where a number of sites promoted their content directly and openly, and even interacted with customers in the forum, despite more than the usual amount of piracy going on openly at the very same time. It's still around, but hardly active compared to 2007.
Anyway, Kink posted a number of Pissing.com FHG's there, and actually got a very negative and discouraging response. They seem to have made the mistake of not understanding their customers. Their style of porn was hardcore with peeing and a BDSM flair, and this tends to appeal to fans of hardcore and BDSM who want to delve into peeing. Their audience at that forum was made up of a different customer base however, it was mostly people with a primary interest in peeing, who were mostly not into or even averse to hardcore, and also averse to porn that appeared too "produced." Pissing.com was definitely both.
Shortly after this discouraging reception, they stopped producing new scenes. They also ran into trouble with their credit card processor since they had person to person peeing, and that undoubtedly also played a role. So when they stopped producing new scenes, that was the next nail in the coffin.
They hung on years after that, but last year, I noticed that while you could get to pissing.com directly, Kink had stripped all links to and mention of Pissing.com from their landing page. This was a sign that maybe they didn't see a spot for Pissing.com in their future.
Then, several months ago, I checked back in on Pissing.com out of curiosity to see if it was still there, and the landing page was full of errors. Another warning sign.
Now the site is gone. I don't see it listed under the sites available in the archives. Maybe the scenes are still buried somewhere in there despite not being listed, but a current member would have to check in order for us to know.
|
01-06-16 09:15am
|
Reply
477
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from tangub:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I've just spent an hour trawling through the photos section of the tour and it seems to imply that they still have all the old stuff there going back as far as the old Babyface stuff from the late 90s. Now that I've had a closer look at the tour I would say they are probably not recycling content.
I'm quite tempted to sign up here again now that you've brought this classic site back to my attention but I have another membership going at the moment and don't really have the time for more than one so I'll have to put it on the back burner for a couple of weeks.
|
12-29-15 12:53pm
|
Reply
478
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from tangub:
It's interesting that you say the site has been around since 2007, I've just checked my stash and I actually had a membership here back in early 2005 and even then they had several years content dating back as far as late 1998.
Looking at the tour I see a lot of models who I have in my collection from way back then so it makes me wonder if they are recycling content. Their early photo sets from the late 90s carried the site name Babyface Mag before changing the name to 18 Eighteen early 2001.
|
12-28-15 04:27pm
|
Reply
479
|
Tiny 4K
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from skippy:
Great review and you cover all the bases perfectly. I just saw your review because T4K was just scored and I had joined a few months ago.
I'll drop a little update into comments.
|
12-27-15 10:29am
|
Reply
480
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from badandy400:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
This was one of my all time favorite replies on this site.
|
12-23-15 03:16pm
|
Reply
481
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks RA, good to see you still around.
My reviews should be a little more balanced score-wise than they used to be since I really don't have hardly any favorite models anymore.
I do believe the move to quality over quantity is important at this point in these sites lives. When you've got 10+ years of content piling up it's time to start focusing on quality since the quantity should already be there. I'll have a couple of more similar sites to compare over the next few weeks between DDF and 21 Sextury, as both of these once top European networks have both started using different update schedules, higher quality, less quantity practices.
I would think Videobox might still keep me coming back at least once a year to get the Vivid updates, but I ended up with nearly 200 GB more content from VideosZ than Videobox.
|
12-20-15 10:59pm
|
Reply
482
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from skippy:
Rearadmiral,
So...what happened? I would hate to think that a company/brand as reputable as Playboy would give you the runaround. I found your note because I was here looking before signing up. I think I'll wait to hear what happens with your case before I do.
Thanks,
Skippy
|
12-04-15 06:55pm
|
Reply
483
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from mistacee:
Completely agree on the points above.
Horrible site navigation. I thought it was just a mobile android device issue. I tried multiple browsers and then went to PC to check it out and you can't open multiple tabs. It just goes back to the main page.
Upgrade to premium prompts was also a very distasteful catch.
Quality of women (appearance-wise) is great. Would have preferred less or no talking from the camera person. Really throws away from the scene when the performer is loosing focus when interrupted.
Not many scenes and honestly, you can blow through most of this in 1 month... scenes get very redundant after a while.
Camera angles on most are also the same, some are just horribly shot to where you can't appreciate more of the woman's body/penetration points.
|
11-14-15 01:44pm
|
Reply
484
|
Black Stepdad
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from mbaya:
Amanda,
Where is the rest of the review? It was not this short.
|
11-03-15 05:46am
|
Reply
485
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from elephant:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Oh I know that lol but I don't have time thats what I mean, next month I'd have to donate to kink.
So would you think the offer would work tomorrow on the 1st of November or will it expire midnight tonight.
|
10-31-15 02:58pm
|
Reply
486
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from elephant:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Hi Rearadmiral
Wow that is so kind of you mate, I've actually gone and emailed kink support and because I'd been a member of a few of their sites in the past they arranged to have an email link for the $39.99 deal. Really worth it I think and gonna be pushed getting all I want in a month though lol.
The deal runs out tomorrow it says on the email so not much chance to finish at the site I'm currently a member of also, I'm trying to cram in all I can today.
With it saying by the 1st of November, do you think this might mean you can still sign up tomorrow. If so what time zone.
The longer I can have at my current site the better to grab the essentials before I have to abandon it.
|
10-31-15 05:54am
|
Reply
487
|
Finishes The Job
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from bkreidercrhl:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thank you for the information. It was exactly what I was seeking. The website will not likely work for my interests.
|
10-31-15 03:05am
|
Reply
488
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from elephant:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
You were lucky still lol, they thought I wasn't even worthy of any discount as no email arrived for poor old me.
|
10-30-15 03:49am
|
Reply
489
|
Finishes The Job
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from bkreidercrhl:
The concept of finishing the job is exciting and the women on the site tour look consistently desirable. Are there a significant number of scenes where the guys uncorks a big load? Do most of the women take cum on their face, ideally on the eye lids, nose, forehead and hair?
|
10-28-15 11:39am
|
Reply
490
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from mbaya:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I must be missing something here. PU has these sites for $19.99 as of a few days ago. Amanda had a thread posting where she made the announcement that we were given the discount. It is given if you sign up under PU. I will quote verbatim
Hi guys,We have new discounts for Kink sites!
Site: Hardcore Gang Bang
Primary Niche: Gang Bangs
Discount: $19.99/30 days,
Site: Bound Gods
Primary Niche: Gay
Discount: $19.99/30 days,
Site: The Training Of O
Primary Niche: BDSM
Discount: $19.95/30 days,
Site: Ultimate Surrender
Primary Niche: Naked Sports
Discount: $19.95/30 days,
Site: TS Pussy Hunters
Primary Niche: Transsexual
Discount: $19.99/30 days,
Site: Everything Butt
Primary Niche: Anal Sex
Discount: $19.99/30 days
Site: Fucking Machines
Site: Whipped Ass
Primary Niche: BDSM
Discount: $19.99/30 days,
Site: Sex And Submission
Primary Niche: BDSM and also the same for
Public Disgrace.
|
10-25-15 01:02pm
|
Reply
491
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from RustyJ:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
It was 29.99$ for all sites, not 39$ ;)
You can still use the old interface by choosing from the front page but for this unlimited subscription it doesn't seem to work.
|
10-25-15 01:01pm
|
Reply
492
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Pyrenees:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Ok so Los Angeles (And some of California) decided to make it impossible to produce porn without condoms. Also Body fluids were classified at hazerdous materials. Basically killing pee and facials. So basically they killed porn in california and lost 300M in tax revenue a year ... in a state that is so far underwater they might as well be Atlantis.
So porn had to move. Most have chosen Las Vegas but they are still in a nebulous grey area on some things. So uncertainty has tremendously impacted over 300 US porn studios. Setting back more than a year of porn and revenue. Really it was a huge blow. Imagine 5,000 people having to move to make a living. It is what happened.
|
10-17-15 09:53am
|
Reply
493
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from MikeC:
REARADMIRAL,
Our contact spoke with Pro Biller on your behalf and customer service is saying they should be able to assist you. Please call them again, explain the mishap and email me (michael@rabbitsreviews.com ) about the results.
Talk to you soon
|
10-13-15 09:38am
|
Reply
494
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from MikeC:
Hi rearadmiral,
I spoke with our contact with Playboy and he confirmed that unfortunately they wouldn't be able to assist in this issue. The billing is overseen by Pro Biller and they would be responsible for any and all customer service/billing issues.
In many instances, because most sites and networks are run by small teams (and in some instances, just one person) it is easy for us to work around customer service issues by speaking directly with the necessary people to get it resolved. In Playboy's case, they're a branded property that's licensed to a large company which itself has its billing handled by another company.
I wish we could be of more assistance on this issue.
|
10-13-15 09:10am
|
Reply
495
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Amanda:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Hi guys!
I'll ask MikeC to weigh in here.
|
10-13-15 05:43am
|
Reply
496
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from LPee23:
Nice review!
I'd also add that they've got the pissing niche covered too on KinkyCarmen.com. Carmen Rivera is a pretty big deal in Germany from what I understand.
To update my previous comment about the webmaster being unreachable, they did eventually get back to me, it just took a long time. I was looking for a particular video that was once released on KinkyCarmen.com, but is no longer online. The webmaster did ask for the details of the video, etc, but I haven't heard anything back since then.
|
10-11-15 08:14pm
|
Reply
497
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Pyrenees:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Indeed that is not at all how I meant it lol. It is so hard to show the proper attitude in text. Quite the opposite. I am very grateful for TBP and PU. Many times I wanted to join a site and a very relevant post kept me from doing so. I take the word of my fellow reviewers very seriously. The main exception being if there is a scene I HAVE to own. For example there was a Kelsi Monro scene on Bangbros I HAD to have. I never liked bangbros I had joined them years ago and was not happy with their quality standards. Despite many so so and lack luster reviews I simply had to join to get the scene I wanted. I think we are all doing our best.
|
10-11-15 06:42pm
|
Reply
498
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from mbaya:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
You should have followed your gut instinct here and not join. I hope you don't have trouble when the time comes to cancel.
|
10-11-15 07:42am
|
Reply
499
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from mbaya:
I wish I had a suggestion here. I hope MikeC tries to help out as he has offered to do in other posts.
|
10-11-15 07:40am
|
Reply
500
|
Black Stepdad
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from mbaya:
This is a very helpful and complete review. Thanks for posting.
|
10-11-15 07:27am
|
