Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#19
from asmith12:
(malikstarks's Reply)
If you can tell me (for the same file) it's size in bytes (megabytes, gigabytes) AND it's length in minutes, I can easily calculate it's bitrate. Thanks in advance.
|
11-17-09 12:50am
|
Reply
52
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from asmith12:
(malikstarks's Reply)
> They do take up alot of space 4-5 GBs
Do you know what kind of bitrate they have? Or at least can you tell how long one single file is (in minutes) and how large it is (in gigabytes)?
|
11-16-09 01:55am
|
Reply
53
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from asmith12:
(malikstarks's Reply)
> Brazzers if brighter with much richer color textures.
With AssTraffic colors already being IMHO vastly oversaturated, I can't say it's a good thing if somebody has even more saturated colors.
> Put it this way, I have a very powerful computer that plays the
> Brazzers HD smoothly with no problem at all, but if I try to fast
> forward a scene it will not let me do it, the video freezes. No
> other HD porn has ever given me that problem.
And you see that "video freezes" as an ADVANTAGE for Brazzers?? No comments.
|
11-15-09 10:04pm
|
Reply
54
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from asmith12:
(malikstarks's Reply)
> As for Ass Traffic, it is a site that I was vaguely familiar with before but had never had an interest in membership. Now after having had a look they do indeed shoot vids in 1080p so it probably does match Brazzers offer from that standpoint.
Thanks for comment, but did you REALLY compare Brazzers stuff with Asstrafic HD samples (I think they do have HD sample for free)?
> legitimate beefs with the Brazzers model that I do agree with. First if...
VERY FIRST, they MUST tell RIGHT ON THEIR HOME PAGE that all the HD they're telling about on their home page (like "NOW IN FULL HD" and "Join now and embrace the future with the best HD experience") will NOT be available for the price they're asking for. Do you think THIS kind of stuff (telling user "Join now and embrace the future with the best HD experience", and THEN, when he clicks there and 'Joins now', PAYING them money they're asking, to ask MORE for this very 'HD experience' they've just promised and he just paid for") is fair?? This is CHEATING (or MISLEADING advertisement AT THE VERY LEAST), and IF I would join them because of HD they advertise, I would FOR SURE ask my bank to revert transaction.
Is there a chance of them stopping this kind of CHEATING of THEIR OWN USERS? I don't think so, unless they will get hit by reversed transactions because of it (which I hope for).
|
11-12-09 10:11pm
|
Reply
55
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from asmith12:
(malikstarks's Reply)
1. Are you sure their stuff is really better than HD from AssTraffic? I doubt it (and AssTraffic is NOT charging anything extra for them, and DOES provide good download speeds).
2. WHOLE 100% of your reply is EXACTLY what their support / webmaster would say in reply to user ranting about their newer policies (ESPECIALLY passages like "if you still want to get the HD vids you have two ways to do so. Purchase the credits, or remain a member for 6 months."). Rather strange, isn't it?
|
11-12-09 05:01am
|
Reply
56
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(malikstarks's Reply)
I'm one of those rare surfers that dreads the arrival of HD. MY ISP provider has a 100GB download limit per month. Any downloads above that amount is very expensive. I didn't mention much in my review about the HD. I don't have an issue if a site rewards it's long term members with it. The main reason why the site didn't get a higher score is because far too many of the performers have implants.
I wouldn't mind a better balance of normal and fakes.
|
10-30-09 06:05pm
|
Reply
57
|
Brazzers Reel
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
from Denner:
Let's have an answer from some webmaster on this one.....
BTW:
More and more site are being grabbed/taken over ect. by this Manwin Canada Co...........And more problems seems to occur to the users/customers?
|
08-14-11 10:46am
|
Reply
58
|
Brazzers Reel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lone59:
(malikstarks's Reply)
Yeah. this site isnt very good. Brazzers makes a big deal about the library and the "HD" content, but you have to buy credits to download or view a lot of the premium content and the other stuff can be found on any of the other websites like Videosz or Videobox.
I havent had many issues with the main Brazzers site and even their Mofos off shoot while not having a ton of quality content has been pretty standard, but this website just isnt very good and is incredibly lacking all things considered.
|
08-13-11 06:43am
|
Reply
59
|
Candy Monroe
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr smut:
(malikstarks's Reply)
That's what I'm afraid of. The site being to good to stay away but not good enough to stay there for a longer period of time.
There's something very appealing about Candy. Guess I'll give it a try soon.
|
09-27-10 10:28pm
|
Reply
60
|
Chessie Land
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from fiou:
(malikstarks's Reply)
Yes I got it. Thanks
|
04-03-11 08:30am
|
Reply
61
|
Chessie Land
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from fiou:
(malikstarks's Reply)
Fraud? I did cancel it through CCbill. But never received a confirmation.I'll carefully check my next credit card statement, and the one after that.
|
03-27-11 12:20pm
|
Reply
62
|
Chubby Loving
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from sniffer:
(malikstarks's Reply)
Thanks for the tips, mate. I'll check out the sites you recommend.
|
04-17-08 07:36am
|
Reply
63
|
Cougars In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
from Toadsith:
Did you mean Naughty America's quantity of content is more than Cougars In Heat? Because you said the opposite - which to me would be all the reason in the world to charge more. As per my review I'm sure you know that I'm quite fond of Cougars In Heat. Granted there are other sites with more content per dollar, but this site delivers what it promises and messes about with different scenarios and models to keep the content fresh and interesting while staying within their niche. That is a tough feat to pull off.
I recently reviewed All Internal which is a very comparable site as it doesn't grant you access to its network of sites, is a quite specific niche and for all intents and purposes is a better site - especially technology wise (wonderful search engine, review system, et cetera). However that site gets a bit boring after awhile. As Cougars In Heat continues to grow and if they add a search engine and such - I could see rating it higher than All Internal in the future because it changes its scenarios and adds a bit of fantasy to the porn.
All in all, I honestly believe their price is justified and a good site shouldn't be put down for charging premium price when they provide premium, exclusive content.
|
03-17-08 02:05pm
|
Reply
64
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from dextro:
(malikstarks's Reply)
I had a membership a while back and didn't have any billing problems. I canceled during the first month. I do use prepaid cards for all of my memberships just in case.
The only problem I had with the site was the subpar video quality. It seemed to be an issue across all of the Fame Digital sites, but may now be rectified.
|
04-11-12 11:32am
|
Reply
65
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
from RustyJ:
I never experienced any issues but I hope it works for you!
Please post a comment when they enable HD download on this site or if they already did. I'm rejoining when they do that on DevilsFilm (and also on RoccoSiffredi site).
|
05-29-11 09:47pm
|
Reply
66
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
from lk2fireone:
As for value, the special PU/TBP $9.95/monthly price for network access is a great deal.
But I also think that the Teen Mega World (Royal Cash) network at $19.95/month for network access is also a great deal.
And Metart, even though a single site, at $19.95/month, is also a bargain. Metart is so large that it could be split into many decent-sized solo sites (which I am glad they did not do-even though they have Metmodels, which is a smaller, sister site of Metart).
|
05-29-11 08:38pm
|
Reply
67
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
from slutty:
I haven't experienced any billing problems with them, so perhaps it was just a one time screw up. I agree that the value is tough to beat.
|
05-29-11 07:13pm
|
Reply
68
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
from anyonebutme:
Sorry to hear. There are a couple updates, not from this site, but from others in the network next month that I want, and for sure I'm pulling out the virtual credit card numbers and setting that up to guarantee only one charge for the correct amount.
|
02-22-11 11:49am
|
Reply
69
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
from Veev:
Hi!
My name is Veev and I manage the sites. Thank you for your feedback. It's always appreciated because we know that there are things that may have been overlooked and only an outsider who goes through the process can tell us what to correct.
That said, I want you to know that we strive to keep our name in the industry as safe, reliable and trustworthy, so I have a feeling there's a perfectly good explanation to this.
In order for me to help you better, can you please send me an email with this post as well as all the necessary information. I'll forward it to our customer service department so they can check why you you were charged 3 times as far as I understood right?
In our join page, I only see Porn Access as the pre-checked cross sales and no third site...so not sure what I am missing so I'd rather have CS look into this.
Here's my email: veev@famedollars.com .
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Thanks!
|
02-22-11 09:54am
|
Reply
70
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
from slutty:
That sucks man. Too bad, it is a decent site that I tend to join from time to time, guess I will have to hold off until this billing situation is resolved...
|
02-21-11 08:24pm
|
Reply
71
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#18
from rearadmiral:
(malikstarks's Reply)
The thought that there is some randomness to this might explain a lot. It may be that some folks are part of the beta and others aren't. Good point.
|
12-11-18 03:16pm
|
Reply
72
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from rearadmiral:
(malikstarks's Reply)
Thanks for this. I like the idea of a 'Netflix of porn' by a company with such a broad range of sites and a reputation for quality. If they offered this at a reasonable price I'd join and likely never leave. I don't know what that 'reasonable price' is though. I'd pay $50 USD per month because I know Gamma's stuff and like it but a less dedicated collector may balk at that price.
I recently joined three Gamma sites with Black Friday deals (B Skow, Evil Angel and Fantasy Massage) and it doesn't appear that I have Adult Time access. This may be because the discount memberships I have are all really inexpensive ($5) and are streaming only.
I'm a regular subscriber to many Gamma sites so when I join one again soon I'll have to see what happens.
|
12-10-18 04:41am
|
Reply
73
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mbaya:
(malikstarks's Reply)
I entered by putting my id information into an individual Evil Angel site. The network then opened up. Hope this helps, let me know.
|
12-08-18 05:46pm
|
Reply
74
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(malikstarks's Reply)
Don't forget that you also get the 21sextury, 21naturals and 21sextreme networks.
|
12-08-18 02:24pm
|
Reply
75
|
Exploited Moms
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mr3633:
(malikstarks's Reply)
Malikstarks,
Thank you for providing your feedback. Good to know about the improvements like weekly updates and video quality. The fact that they still do not allow users to download files in a single clip will likely keep me from joining (atleast for now). Perhaps down the road they will get on the bandwagon with this like many of the high quality sites out there. Thanks again.
|
04-24-08 11:31am
|