Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(badandy400's Reply)
Not only a 1TB, but maybe 2 or 3. Or more.
I signed up using the three month network option that was offered in August and I just can't find the time to D/L all of the superb content I've found on this and the other sites.
A HUGE uptick for the quality of the babes and the videos they've made.
It's too early for me to write a review but I'm a notch higher than an 85...but not a lot of notches.
|
09-26-09 11:55am
|
Reply
77
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ControllingMind:
(badandy400's Reply)
Ha yeah, I also leave no stone unturned. I broke into another external HD because I downloaded the WMV and the DivX files a lot of the time.
My most satisfactory experience with adult website customer service to date.
|
09-25-09 06:55am
|
Reply
78
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from turboshaft:
This is one of my top complaints about this network, and it can be very annoying. The majority -- but by no means all -- of the content can be found on 1ByDay, but plenty of material is spread throughout the other sites. Minus maybe CherryJul and Sophie's Fantasies, which have only have a few months of archives before they apparently gave up the ghost, most of these sites have quite a bit to dive into, but 1BD is still where I start looking for stuff.
|
09-24-09 02:57pm
|
Reply
79
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from magrury:
(badandy400's Reply)
what the hell? i am only able to download ONE vid at a time? i am in the trial version, and i wonder if anyone that has joined has experienced this:
you click several vids to download
when you check back, only 1 has taken
you go back to click another and it starts, then as soon as you look away (it seems) they stop
when you try and open another window upon downloading the one file, the site appears to be down
this is fucking ridiculous, i thought it was only the trial that limited download numbers but it seems like after paying the Euro price of 30$ you still get screwed. i have only downloaded 4 videos in two days. let me check one and see if it may be worth all this......wow these Euros have some big ass tits. they dont all appear to be teens though, which is what drew me here in the 1st place. the guys are in very very good shape, which is distracting. screams PORN MOVIE!! NO REGULAR GUY LIKE YOU CAN EVER FUCK THIS GIRL!!
i appreciate their attempt to make a comparable site, cause their girls are hotter than most group sites. there are hotter girls but they are all on their own site. Cindy Milley, ect, so i get it, but they MUST have gotten complaints by now and have fixed nothing. so i'm cancelling my trial after getting maybe 6 videos (by tommorrow)
and i'm gonna start up ANOTHER trial account. that's what they get if they fuck with us. i considered spending the full amount until i started downloading. Cheers
|
09-24-09 10:07am
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from turboshaft:
(badandy400's Reply)
The only thing that sucks is when some sites require you to sign in again after a certain amount of time -- very frustrating!
|
09-20-09 03:19pm
|
Reply
81
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(badandy400's Reply)
I was on another site and saw an ad for Reality Kings at an 80% discount - I clicked on it to see what the offer was and it was an offer for $9.95/mo or $70 or so for 1 year - amazing offer.
So I would expect that the offer that you received is real - it's pretty clear that a bird in the hand is worth more to these sites than 12 in the bush.
|
09-19-09 12:12am
|
Reply
82
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from exotics4me:
Hey badandy, this probably won't help much when downloading by site, but if you go to the DDF Prod page, they have a model index on it and it shows every scene each model has and what site(s) the set is on.
|
09-16-09 04:51am
|
Reply
83
|
YouStrip
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(badandy400's Reply)
Not sure, but they may be a type of flash video.
At one point they did offer a choice of 3 Hi Res videos for download for a renewal of subscription.
I like the concept, but I wish they would get the site better organised. :0/
|
09-15-09 01:15pm
|
Reply
84
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Vegas Ken:
(badandy400's Reply)
Hi everyone!
I figured I would just drop in and let everyone know that you guys will also get the 18 Month Membership (12 months + 6 months free) for $119.96 as well. If not, please let me know and I will get in touch with Videobox.
Thanks for using our site!!!
Vegas Ken
|
08-25-09 09:49am
|
Reply
85
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Nick Nxn:
(badandy400's Reply)
Badandy400,
I was never able to resume a download. I always had to start over. Unfortunately, I will not sign up again to find out. It seems that some sites spend too much time stopping people from downloading too much content at once. I would think that the time and energy would be better spent on making content that would keep members coming back for more.
|
08-25-09 08:25am
|
Reply
86
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from wildstar:
(badandy400's Reply)
-I am using "Download Express" from Meta products.On other sites he work's fine.
-I am using one connection per download.
-I am downloading one file at the time.
-He dont even ask's for my password.
-When i downloaded a file,it is stored as a php-file.
Thanks for the quick reaction.
|
08-15-09 11:47pm
|
Reply
87
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from xbigvmanx:
(badandy400's Reply)
I went ahead and seperated the text in 4 parts to make it easier for the reader. Thanks for the suggestions.
|
08-15-09 09:52pm
|
Reply
88
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from largeun:
(badandy400's Reply)
Pissed me right off!!!!
I have been harping on about umbrella memberships and after securing a deal with DDF a few months ago for two sites, I find out that ALL the sites can be joined for the same money I paid.
In fact, I even suggested this in my recent review.
It would have been courteous of DDF to inform me of such an offer, assuming they knew at the time.
Either way, it's a great offer and a long time coming (pun).
I would grab it people.
|
08-12-09 04:52am
|
Reply
89
|
Cum Brushers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(badandy400's Reply)
ok, that gives us something to go on. We're looking into the problem right now.
Thanks for the heads up!
|
08-11-09 08:13pm
|
Reply
90
|
Cum Brushers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(badandy400's Reply)
Sorry, you lost me. When you clicked what link to Incredible Pass? I ask because we disable the links to the site when we decide it's one we don't do business with.
|
08-11-09 06:47pm
|
Reply
91
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from dracken:
Thank you for sharing this very important information. This definitely puts buying membership here into perspective.
|
08-11-09 10:01am
|
Reply
92
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from GCode:
(badandy400's Reply)
Totally agree with the acting at all quote. That's why I put acting ruins a scene solely based on the fact that usually when I tell a model is totally faking an orgasm or just downright bad at acting, the scene is ruined. I'm actually surprised so far that it appears that I'm the only one who put this. However, jd makes a great point as well that porn is kind of like a cartoon, therefore fantasy. So, if a model is acting well or 'the part' as you put it, then the scene will be better.
But, I think this comes down to what people want as 'acting' in their porn. I suppose it can be defined as just the downright demeanor of a model because the scene is fantasy to begin with, so therefore everything captured within the scene is acting to begin with. Or, it could even just be the part that the model is playing, such as innocence or aggressiveness. But, I suppose it could even be how sexually real the scene is compared to acting in terms of the model actually enjoying the actual sexual act within the scene. There probably are more definitions or examples, but I'd say all the above are valid.
However, in terms of this poll and how I personally potray 'acting' (probably mainly because I watch mostly solo scenes) is how sexually turned on the model is within the video in terms of realness. So, fake orgasms and so on, really ruin a scene for me.
|
08-10-09 04:33pm
|
Reply
93
|
Sexy Miss Lizz
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from seekr34:
(badandy400's Reply)
I might do that tomorrow, right now, too tired. If you like milf, Lizz is the one. Will try and do a review tomorrow.
|
08-08-09 10:54pm
|
Reply
94
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from jd1961:
(badandy400's Reply)
It's only good for August because it's their 10th anniversary. And it's a one-time charge, no recurring.
|
08-07-09 05:44pm
|
Reply
95
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(badandy400's Reply)
Yes, vive la difference!
Actually, though the name might seem to imply a fondness for messy stuff, it practically states on its own that the "goop" in question is, er, generated autonomously.
So you like it a little less on the tidy side of the porn spectrum? S'Ok with me. Sounds the makings of fun parody song, using that one by Dave Mason, "It's only you and me and we just disagree." It would be accepted on whatfreaks.com.
Have you looked at Clara G's site? Sounds like it would be right up your alley.
|
08-02-09 04:26am
|
Reply
96
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from dingle:
(badandy400's Reply)
Oh maybe they stopped on the download limit- when my pc broke 5 months ago i lost everything and spent a weekend downloading 80%
of the videos again.
The only email i got was from my ISP saying i over shot my limit by 30 gigs & dont do it again.
As far as im aware i dont think there is a limit but i could be wrong
and just got lucky...
|
07-16-09 12:41pm
|
Reply
97
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from careylowell:
(badandy400's Reply)
I've no idea from whom that 'No' hailed from. Maybe one of you computer jedis can unscramble his anonymous ID. My gut feeling is his dark designs haunt some other site, that he's an ex-member.
|
07-11-09 08:00pm
|
Reply
98
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from careylowell:
(badandy400's Reply)
I received the 'No trust' after reviewing nine sites. I had been a member of each for at least a month. Can't recall what led me to type "..I joined seven of the nine sites mentioned..." It should of read that of the nine, I belonged to seven for just a month.
I have since rejoined two but haven't updated my reviews due to sheer laziness.
So my rating is tagged with 'No' trust. That dude could of gilded the bitter pill by either not being anonymous or writing more than two sentences to explain his decision.
I appreciate your concern, Badandy400.
|
07-11-09 06:53am
|
Reply
99
|
Housewife Gemma
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from csbadger49:
(badandy400's Reply)
badandy400,
Your points are valid. I went into this thinking it would be a bit of a specialty site. But I just didn't feel it was worth the money and the intro page is definately misleading. That is probably what pissed me off and resulted in the score of 50 - very misleading advertising, even to the video on the sign-up page that doesn't match anything on the inside. The lady definately has a lot to offer but is ripping us off.
Thanks for your thoughts. I guess I'm just a very hard grader!
|
07-10-09 06:26pm
|
Reply
100
|
Housewife Gemma
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd10:
(badandy400's Reply)
I signed up for that about a month ago and I can tell you the above review is accurate - you get...approx. 100 pics small in size and poor quality for the 29.95 subscription fee...no videos at all....thus in my opinion the site is a complete "rip off" as they do advertise videos on the main page....I have signed up for other sites from the group also and they are also not worth the money...save your money on this one!
|
07-10-09 02:34pm
|