| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from highparkman:
(GCode's Reply)
Thanks for your response. I was not blaming the site for censorship. I need to clarify my issue is that the site does not clearly state that the content is heavily censored. Which impacts the potential customer from making an informed decision. The vast minority of clients would have NO idea about Japanese law (me included), and I suspect would never subscribe to view images and videos with blurred out areas. It's all about ethical marketing and transparency with jsexnetwork.com.
As for the log-in issues, it's still ongoing for me, and is being addressed by the site owner's tech support.
Now I ask you: If one is having continual difficulty logging in, and once logged in, discovers the site is censored to soft porn standards, why would I assess it a rating beyond 60?
I don't write these reviews lightly, and it's my honest take on the situation. I did say the photos are beautiful, but hey, pretty pictures can be had for free on a myriad of other sites.
Regards,
Peter
|
05-30-09 02:50pm
|
Reply
252
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#28
from asmith12:
(GCode's Reply)
Crystal clear 1280 video? Frankly, yet to see one, even at 4MBit/s. And at 2G/hour I don't think it's worth it (I prefer to fit my collection on single HDD, it's so much simpler to manage it that way), so at this time I prefer to stick to non-HD versions which IMHO tend to be much clearer and crispier these days; in addition, bringing poorly lighted scene into HD will just highlight this poor lighting.
> So, I'm not saying your wrong or that videos at that rate can't be
> good, but for some of the prices I spend for sites and it being mid
> 2009, these videos are absolutely horrid for the most part on a lot
> of sites still.
Well, if we agree that it is not about sheer bitrates, but about OVERALL QUALITY, I'm with you :-). BTW, it once again brings us to importance of mentioning NOT only TBP-like "dry facts" in reviews, but also to mention subjective things like "encoding is horrible for this bitrate".
|
05-30-09 12:21am
|
Reply
253
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from asmith12:
(GCode's Reply)
Personally I'm MUCH less demanding for the encoding. 720 and 1.5Mbit/s (though it should be REALLY GOOD encoding in 1.5Mbit/s) is all what I'm asking from encoding these days. On the other hand, I'm MUCH more demanding to the original shooting; IMHO if footage was shoot on something like my Sony Z1 (and my feeling is that at least 50% of the sites are using something worse, and only about 10% are using something significantly better), it just doesn't make any sense to go as high as 4MBit/s when encoding it. Oh, and PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE, no interlacing (one of the reasons why I don't like Z1 - it does NOT have progressive formats), and interlaced footage looks HORRIBLE on any attempt to pan, even after deinterlacing. And don't forget about proper lighting - dull lighting will be dull and unattractive regardless of the megabits spent on encoding.
|
05-28-09 10:07pm
|
Reply
254
|
Pantyhose Lane
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from cucuta:
(GCode's Reply)
Pantyhose Lane is updated with video clips every Tuesday and Thursday and clips are three to five minutes in length and offered at both low bandwidth and high bandwith to support both our dialup and broadband clients. Access to video clips is included in your site membership along with access to the daily photo galleries
About one or two videos per girl except Akira who has dozens.
|
05-28-09 04:40pm
|
Reply
255
|
Shemale Japan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from zergling:
(GCode's Reply)
i currently deicided to give this site another go and i can say from what i have seen the site has improved its good to see most of the camera man invovlement has been removed)been a few times he cant help himself).seems to be a few good cumshots theres one girl cant yuna that squirts like a fountian .i think its on the way up from the content i have seen so far.ill give you another update soon
|
05-28-09 04:03am
|
Reply
256
|
Ladyboy Gold
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
from james4096:
I did not even notice that thing about the updates. I think that's lame. From their point of view it sounds like a good idea, you know getting people to stick around for an extra month or two just to see the update they basically joined for. But that actually pisses the customers off and make them want to leave. Good thing people like you noticed and said something about it.
|
05-26-09 07:58pm
|
Reply
257
|
Ladyboy Gold
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment from GCode:
Wow moments after posting this and looking even more in to things, I noticed that an image screenshot from a review at PornInspector shows the members area and the UPCOMING UPDATE is the same exact UPCOMING UPDATE they have scheduled this week and it says this review was written in 2007! Great, so they are obviously shady then.
|
05-25-09 06:24pm
|
Reply
258
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from wiild1:
(GCode's Reply)
Many sites just use the same 4-8 male stars over and over again. In scene number one he is "the son", in the next scene he is "the father". :-)
If they could be bothered about quality they should type cast...especially when it comes to the MILF category, the whole fantasy is about an older MILF hooking up with a younger, attractive dude! Then cast a younger, attractive dude!
|
05-21-09 01:53am
|
Reply
259
|
Spears Fever
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from exotics4me:
(GCode's Reply)
Hey GCode, yeah those samples worried me. Susana reminds me of a woman who would have made a great actress in movies. That could be an idea for a thread that could be useful, have the members list their best 10 models, that way everyone could maybe find at least one or two they hadn't seen before. If you are interested in Susana's content, Twistys has a lot, including a video of her in a gym, stripping her workout clothes off that is really good. Teen Dreams has a nice collection of her work too, 1byday also has a good collection of her. She fits the mold of the type of models I usually prefer, just like Eve Angel does, beyond a teen, not quite a mature. There is a whole group of those models that I collect.
|
05-21-09 12:27am
|
Reply
260
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd1961:
(GCode's Reply)
Personally, I am never able to download 15 GB in a day. At this site, it would equate to about 10 full movies or so.
|
05-20-09 11:50pm
|
Reply
261
|
TS Miami Goddess
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from james4096:
(GCode's Reply)
Sorry man, I don't remember much. I did cancel immediately. It looks like they may have added content though. I wish I had been hanging around PU, I would have wrote a review.
I know still have 2 videos of her, but anything else would be on my old computer.
|
05-19-09 03:59pm
|
Reply
262
|
TS Miami Goddess
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
from james4096:
I subscribed year ago maybe. It was pretty lame as far as I remember. It probably hasn't gotten any better. There were only a handful of videos, and the quality wasn't great.
|
05-19-09 02:56pm
|
Reply
263
|
Ladyboy 69
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
from zergling:
i personally thing this is properly the best shemale site on the net i was a member for a year and will join again soon the video work is amazing .the updates my not be as big as other sites but its the quality of the camera men and the pride they take in there job which makes it a winner.i dont think any site delivers better video than them maybe shemaleclub is close but good review i think i will review it soon
|
05-15-09 06:30pm
|
Reply
264
|
Shemale Yum
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from zergling:
(GCode's Reply)
i was a member of shemale japan and i was nt at all pleased with the site and asked for refund i totally agree with your review on shemale japan 100 percent listen i think most members would be more than happy to have more cumshots in there updates and maybe scale back the ammount that is updated. anyways there not really updating that much there just breaking down one girls shoot into 2 to 3 part and dragging as much out of one solo shoot as they cane .some cases you can see right through.im a current member of shemalestrokers.com and im totally fine with there updates which is two a week but they always end in a cumshot its soon to be 3 rumour has it as sammy said a while back.the cumshot is so important to a shemalefan to say its not the focal point is wrong.i think this issue needs to be looked at from the members point of view.im just wonering how many other members of shemaleyum.com and grooby sites have left due to these update policies
|
05-14-09 02:16am
|
Reply
265
|
Shemale Yum
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from zergling:
(GCode's Reply)
yeah i dont think much of the shooting policy but your right some people must like it i quess.i hope this first review was nt to bad i just spoke honestly i hope i was nt to negative cos the site is good but some issues need addressing.
|
05-12-09 09:42pm
|
Reply
266
|
Siya Junji
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(GCode's Reply)
I did not sign up for the other sites. On this one there are promos for the others, but they don't look any better than this one. You get what you pay for, though.
|
05-11-09 02:44am
|
Reply
267
|
Ladyboy Gold
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from james4096:
(GCode's Reply)
I should have wrote a review, but I forgot and now my subscription has expired.
Almost all of the content consists of those featured models. There is some bonus stuff in there. Some photos of "amateurs" and some extras photo sets and videos of ladyboys and a few DVD scenes of featuring Brazilian girls, IIRC. I also know that one of the models, Wawa, has gone post-op.
What else...Vids are 720x540 1751kbps.
I didn't get a chance to get all the content I wanted from that site. I am usually pissed off when they don't have zips and I want to download photos, so I think I canceled very soon. I don't remember how much content of Amy there is but If she is you're fav you'll probably be joining eventually. For the record, I have been known to join sites for 1 scene featuring one models I like. $39.95 is a lot of fucking money for one site though.
sorry i couldn't be more help.
|
05-10-09 02:26am
|
Reply
268
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(GCode's Reply)
Glad to see that some of my peers agree with my views, GCode. And I think you are right in your assessment. If Naughty America had been the first porn site I ever came across it would have probably thrilled me no end. Now many sites later, ho hum.
|
05-09-09 01:31pm
|
Reply
269
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(GCode's Reply)
Your're absolutly right - I'm only going after special models here - was a bit taken to see Julia Ann (she was and still is great) and Janet Mason who has videos at NA in much better quality than at her own site...
|
05-09-09 03:13am
|
Reply
270
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Dmander6:
(GCode's Reply)
OK - forget the hard core stuff - i'm sure you will like NUBILES - Teenrotica is also nice by the way... but I guess you know that
|
05-08-09 01:37pm
|
Reply
271
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Dmander6:
(GCode's Reply)
Fair enough - But for me it cant get teen cute enough even when it is fake and over the top.
How do you feel about Nubiles? -have you tried Teen Core Club? -that site is my top favourite teen site it is very very very good....
|
05-08-09 12:26pm
|
Reply
272
|
Total Tranny Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
from james4096:
Looks like the same company as Tranny Boss. Same pre-check crosses too. Was that the problem you had with trannyboss? I don't remember, was it just the pre-check cross sales on the join page or other charges?
TBP doesn't do business with the company division that runs trannyboss.
I'm a member of one site that's on this network, only tgirls, which I know you had been a member of, and I haven't had any problems. I'm also a member of another site run by the company, chubby pov. I may not have joined had I known.
|
05-08-09 12:29am
|
Reply
273
|
Teen Emery
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from james4096:
(GCode's Reply)
Thanks for the reply GCode,
If you factor in the whole network it's not a bad price for one month. That means more updates. Same quality as the above site, but different content and style. I haven't bothered to look at every video yet, but I think it's decent teen stuff. The girls are pretty nice.
Here's a rundown:
Babysitter Movies is the only hardcore site and it's shot in POV, 19 scenes.
Girls Left Alone features different girls doing solo - 27 scenes
Teen Lesbian Land is all lesbian scenes with 2 or more girls lezzing it out usually with toys - 53 scenes.
Teen Sleepover is more lesbian stuff, but they don't seem to be updating anymore - 10 scenes
So that's about what 130 vids. You can get more elsewhere but I haven't seen these videos anywhere else and it's all teen stuff. If you join for a year it comes out to less than $8 a month. That's seems fair, but I'd rather just grab everything for $25.
|
05-07-09 11:38pm
|
Reply
274
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from badandy400:
(GCode's Reply)
This has been the only major issue I have had. I can not say that there is correlation between network sites and members being screwed over. If you think about it for a minute network sites should have more issues with members. After all they have more members, at least more than the smaller individual sites.
I have been with Br5azzers for a good while, I was at reality kings and bangbros before, and now i am at naughty america. So far no issues with any of them, especially ones like this.
If you watch the videos from incredible pass you quickly get the impression that they are trying to rip the girls off. The trouble is that they got the taste of ripping people off and decided they could do a lot more. They somehow got it in their head that ripping customers off is a good idea.
|
05-07-09 09:56pm
|
Reply
275
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(GCode's Reply)
Hey GCode,
Sorry for the delay in response. I haven't been a member on Only Cuties since November/December. The last time I was a member, I had a similar feeling about the site that I had when I reviewed it. It doesn't completely blow me away with its model selection since I usually like the mid-20s models better than the teen models, but the quality of the content makes up for it. I would probably lower the grade 1-3 points if I were to do a re-review of it. I still think it is a highly recommended site though, especially for those who like hardcore. What I've noticed when dealing with the Euro models though, if there is hardcore, you'll rarely find any of the top Euro models in those so it is a bunch of models that I've never heard of doing those hardcore scenes.
I will probably post some more re-reviews, just had 6 memberships expire in the last week, all were sites I had been a member of before and eventually, I will swing back by Only Cuties, they can get me with their Cindy Hope content, and seems they have some Suzie Carina content that I don't have.
|
04-30-09 02:20pm
|
