Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Burning Angel
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Alternative, tattooed, rebellious, sounds like my college years, except for the tattooed part.
This is a large site with 1,544 scenes but take note: It has not updated since mid-November 2021. That is two months. It was averaging two scenes per month. There have been none over the last 2 months. I don’t know if the site is now dead or not.
The newer scenes can be downloaded in 4K.
If you like hardcore porn, you will probably like this site a lot. Including hardcore lesbian scenes. Which is unique to me. You don’t see really hardcore lesbian scenes on a regular basis.
Bondage, BSDM, gags are all featured in different scenes. |
| Cons: |
It’s not updating. That is a newer problem. The last update was on November 14, 2021. I have kept up with this site for several years. I wouldn’t be surprised if it starts updating again. They seemed to be going through some changes with the types of scenes. Maybe it’s just temporary?
I believe the lesbian scenes really stand out as good. The rest of it is going to push a lot of boundaries for people. It’s quite hardcore and rough. |
| Bottom Line: |
My original interest site was based on the fact that I was kind of alternative, rebellious young woman in college. I never did get into the tattoos. I think the star of the site, Joanna Angel, is really sexy. I had enough reason to like the site and keep up with it. I won’t talk too much more about the sudden stoppage of updates. If/when it changes, I will update the review or post a comment. Right now, it has been over 2 months since the last update. There was a change going on. The site adopted a theme of having 3-4 scenes that followed a similar story. I believe overall, the site is a definitive hit or miss site. I don’t believe there’s much middle ground for porn fans. If you dislike tattoos, the site is pretty much out for you. If you don’t like hardcore porn, the site is pretty much out for you. They’ve not found a happy medium. The lesbian scenes are even much more hardcore than we expect from two or three women.
The quality is there. They have up to 4K downloads. It’s not as hardcore or polarizing as Kink Network. It’s close. You have to throw in the tattoos. The majority of the newer scenes do take a more BDSM, bondage, gags, whips style approach. I believe that is hit or miss. I don’t mean the person swinging the whip. I really like the lesbian scenes on this site. The reason is, I have never had a lesbian encounter and there’s a part of me that believes this more hardcore style is what it would really be like. I’m not at liberty to discuss psychological and therapy topics. I do know there is a certain level of physicality in lesbian relationships. That and Joanna Dark keeps my interest on this site.
Some of the lesbian parts I have noticed: There seems to be real sub/dom tension between the women. Some of these women are not regular porn stars. I haven’t ever seen some of them on any site. The lack of an established role leads to very intense sex. It’s as if each one is trying to establish their dominance over the other. They do not leave out the parts you would expect from a lesbian scene. There is passionate kissing. You can see the escalation of emotions. The women’s bodies even react how their bodies should, between hard nipples and very wet lower regions. There is a realness there. It is why I don’t like BDSM between a male and female. Physically, the likelihood of a female being dominant over a male is just not that likely. If he’s an establish sub and likes that role. That more understandable, but it loses that tension. Someone needs to make a purely lesbian site where neither woman is the established dominant one. That is something porn lacks.
That is the strong point of the site for me. It’s enough reason to keep up with the site. I do have problems with believability in porn. Having a site where I can see and feel the tension, it fixes the believability problem.
The rest of the scenes are standard harder than normal hardcore. I’m surprised how long some of the scenes are. The people are going at it at a fevered pitch. They’re lasting 40 minutes. As a viewer, I believe that loses some of the enjoyment. It becomes punishing to watch. That is the hit or miss aspect for me. Hopefully, the site will return to updating. It is not the first time the site has had a layoff. They were shooting some scenes as self-shot to avoid the Covid restrictions. It could be anything has delayed the current updates. My recommendation is based on my own experience. If you can find certain styles of scenes on this site that, do it for you, it’s a really good site. I don’t think anyone will like all the styles of scenes. Maybe takes a little patience. |
|
02-09-22 06:53am
Replies (0)
|
Review
52
|
Pretty Dirty
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Story-driven porn that I do believe represented the precursor for the better-known Pure Taboo.
There are 206 scenes. There are no more updates. It has its importance, though.
All scenes have from mobile resolution to 1080p downloads. No 4K.
Generally attractive male and female models. Derrick Pierce is one of my favorite male models and he has several scenes on this site.
It is, in my opinion, more hardcore than Pure Taboo and less reliant on atmosphere.
The site works very well and is easy to use. |
| Cons: |
Less time in the scenes would seem to point to less story, but I believe it’s the less atmosphere that is causing the shorter scenes. The actions show the darker side of this site. I list that as a con because there’s obviously a reason they switched to the style of Pure Taboo, which isn’t as physically dominant. Could be a pro for you, could be a con.
No updates, but I remember a time that I joined Pure Taboo when it first came out. I thought it was going to include Adult Time. It didn’t. It only included Pretty Dirty. It feels like there is a reason they don’t want the Pretty Dirty content grouped with the Pure Taboo content. |
| Bottom Line: |
My feeling here could be a very simple feeling. I believe Pretty Dirty was pushing boundaries that were maybe too risky to push. One thing I haven’t seen talked about with this site is 80 of the 206 scenes are behind the scenes, scenes. You really only get 126 porn scenes. The scenes are generally shorter than on Pure Taboo. There is less lighting and atmosphere in the scenes. It’s going to cause me to feel different emotions towards the scenes. Whereas I believe Pure Taboo creates an uncomfortable setting, then has more standard sex that isn’t that hardcore. Pretty dirty lets the action and sex make you uncomfortable. The part I also notice is the feature type scenes that they seemed to be building their site with. The one that stands out the most is the Indirect Relations series. It is directed by Bree Mills and Craven Moorehead. Two names I am familiar with. The scenes like that one, to me, are where a site like this needs to be at. That scene is very emotional, and I wonder if it crossed lines. If it was too much? It is about a father that was having sex with his daughter which led to his divorce. It’s not stepdaughter. The story grows or sinks into the dad soliciting a prostitute, a drug addict and his daughter, for an orgy. That’s really pushing boundaries. That’s all made worse by the dad being a cop. When you get into a topic that taboo and controversial, you are reliant on the viewer having the open-mind and understanding it’s acting. I believe porn directors and producers should make that clear. Is it their choice to not go that far or are they being limited? I didn’t freak out watching out. I understood that it was fantasy.
With the part being said about the 80 behind the scenes, scenes. You are only getting 126 porn scenes. Most of these scenes are like Pure Taboo except without the atmosphere. I could see people being split 50/50 on which site/style they like better. I think I like Pretty Dirty’s style better. There’s a lot to be said for certain actions in porn need atmosphere, story and build-up, while others need none of those. I don’t know that this hardcore, taboo content needs a lot of stories. The more story there is the more likely holes in the plot starts to develop. I’m not a huge hardcore porn fan. I do really like these scenes.
The models are all very attractive. I even believe that could play a part in my interest in the scenes. This is the main goal I was looking for. Do I see a reason for the content to switch from Pretty Dirty to Pure Taboo? No. Which makes me think it was something out of their control. The taboo types are similar. The sex is similar. The one thing I really notice is the lighting. Pure Taboo is more artistic, while Pretty Dirty is more raw. You do get both sites so you can like one or other better or love both of them. I feel like both sites push some boundaries in 2022. Even though the plots are not that different than porn for 20-40 years ago. I believe the years of constant gonzo porn with no plot has made these scenes more interesting to people. Just don’t forget your imagination when watching these scenes and listening to the plot. This is not really a complaint. There is casting problems here, too. The scene with Derrick Pierce and Aaliyah Love, is one of the sexiest, but worst cast scenes I have seen. Derrick and another man grab Aaliyah and the other man restrains Aaliyah’s husband while Derrick has sex with her. She tries to make it believable that she doesn’t want it, but she is such a cute, spunky model, it just fails on believability. There were 3 parts she smiles and laughs in while her “husband” is trying to fight to get to her to save her. There are scenes on Pure Taboo with the same problem. They’re either going to have to be more playful of sites or stop putting playful actresses in these scenes. It’s definitely worth checking out. |
|
02-09-22 06:50am
Replies (0)
|
Review
53
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Cute, playful, fun lesbian scenes.
Site updates twice per month and currently has 510 scenes.
All models are pretty or cute or a combination. Most are young and slim to medium build.
Alternating settings in the scenes breaks up what is a formulaic product.
Newest videos have downloads up to 4K. Picture sets are also high quality and downloadable.
The tags are useful (basic) and non-confusing like many sites use. |
| Cons: |
It is formulaic. The scenes last nearly the same amount of time from scene to scene. You see most of the same positions from scene to scene. The different settings at least present a hurdle to work around.
Not much dialogue and what dialogue there is, I can’t understand. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site is very appealing to my eyes. The models are young, cute and pretty. It’s softcore to regular lesbian content. Lots of kissing, touching, giggling, some sex and the models are just as happy when the scenes end as they were when the scenes started.
The first site I ever joined was Nubiles. This site reminds me of the lesbian scenes on Nubiles. I feel like, as a few other PU reviewers have stated, I am starting to get too used to this style or porn. It is still good and can’t deny the models are some of the prettiest/cutest I have seen on a porn site, but I believe like a person that marries just for looks, what is left once you’re used to the looks?
I don’t think this site is one directly aimed at lesbians or even bicurious women. It’s more about the eye candy. There are double or triple (threesome scenes) the pretty, naked, sexual young women on your screen than usual. I shouldn’t say the dialogue is absent. Some of the models do speak English and these are their known words, “Yeah, yeah, oh fuck, yeah, yeah, just like that, yeah, yeah”. I call that not understandable since I am not there and not feeling it. This is a site that has been around a long time. The newer scenes do feature some women that speak that 7-word English vocabulary. The point of that is lesbian porn has improved greatly on even sites related to this one. It’s because the models are more descriptive in their language. Having never been with a woman. I do not know what it takes to make me say yes, yes, oh fuck. I believe this is an example of a site directed more at men. Where just watching these sexy, young women, get naked and roll around with each other IS enough. It still works for me, but I do think they need to improve the interaction between the models.
As I mentioned the site has been around look enough to have 510 scenes and to still be producing two updates per month. The videos have up to 4K. The age of the site is important in relation to the quality of the videos. There was a slowdown of updates on this site from the early to mid-2010s. The scenes during that time have 480p, 540p and 1080p. While the newer scenes have 9 download options. The scenes from before the slowdown top out at only 540p for downloads. Based on the number of pages, that looks like about 50% of the scenes only have up to 540p. I am not going to be that hard on the site. The newest scenes with the high quality downloads still equal in or around 250 and the only real flaw with those is the formulaic feeling. If you’re more into it for just seeing pretty, sexy women, you won’t notice the formulaic parts.
Good site that I believe has to improve in the dialogue to keep up with the newer lesbian sites. |
|
02-09-22 06:47am
Replies (0)
|
Review
54
|
Transfixed
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The best transsexual site for those that want to see transsexuals with women.
It’s a newer site, all the scenes have up to 4K downloads.
Only 31 scenes currently, 4 more in the Transgressive series and the updates are twice per month.
The highest production values I have seen on a transsexual site.
Take your choice, the transsexuals are as pretty as the women. Truly defining site in that sense.
Videos and photos can be downloaded. |
| Cons: |
The small size is the most noticeable, but it is a newer site and is becoming consistent with the updates.
Some camerawork gets lost when there are more than two people in the scene. That can be a problem when the transsexuals are as pretty as the women. |
| Bottom Line: |
The best way to start this is with my last con. It is also one of the pros in direct relation. The transsexuals performing on this site are as pretty as any I have seen. You know you are watching pretty transsexuals when you have to stream the video before downloading, just to see which ones are the transsexuals and which ones are the females. There is one with well-known pornstar Liv Revamped and she even gets lost in the blurring of gender lines. One of the transsexuals in that scene is one of the few transsexual models I know by name, Jessy Dubai. At first glance, the preview screens for these scenes look like lesbian scenes. I don’t think it’s offensive to say, I have watched scenes from this site and been surprised to see one is a female, that one is a transsexual. Very impressive and there are the production values. It is one of the weaknesses of the transsexual genre. A lot of the transsexual scenes have no story. There is little dialogue, and the scenes are just plain. It makes me feel like the selling point is just the fact it’s a transsexual.
The scenes on Transfixed are often in the 40+ minute range, with some even being over an hour. There is a star power in these scenes that I don’t see much on transsexual sites. One of my favorite scenes features one of the most popular female models in porn – Adriana Chechik. It also has Natalie Mars, a Milf transsexual and Khloe Kay, who I believe could pass for a woman, but is a transsexual.
There is a small series of scenes released as Transfixed but listed as Transgressive Films. There are four of those scenes. Those are transsexuals with men. The Transfixed scenes are more focused on women with transsexuals. The 31 scenes are all available to download in 160p mobile, up to 4K. It is, at least in my experience, the first transsexual site I have seen that goes this far with their scenes (production values, costumes, stories). There are also subtitles available on some scenes. The ones with subtitles have those available in English, Spanish, German, French, Dutch, Italian and Portuguese. They are making this site so good, there isn’t even much to nitpick them about. The scenes are sexy, erotic, interesting, kinky and I would go as far as saying – a site like this, could bring transsexual porn more into the mainstream. I have said before I believe transsexuals with women is the way to the mainstream. As a female, I don’t have a problem with watching transsexuals, but I am sure there are men that wouldn’t feel comfortable watching transsexuals. By putting the transsexuals with women, it still makes the scene a dick going in a pussy. No way would I dare try and explain the psychology of that. I look at it on the most basic level of it maintains a level of familiarity for straight males.
The scenes can be downloaded as can small picture zips. Those have 30-50 pictures in each. Those are high resolution photos, but probably wouldn’t be a selling point. They are updating twice per month. The update rate had slowed but has been picking up over the last few months. One thing I will mention that I try to mention in any transsexual review is the types of scenes. The one thing they do not have are solo scenes. Those are usually my favorite, but I do believe that’s because transsexuals with female scenes are so scarce. Once you give me transsexuals with women with this high of production values, a story, the high quality, you have my attention. It’s a site I have the best wishes for. There is definitely a market for transsexuals with women and that market is, women, then becoming women showing their boyfriends or husbands the porn they like. Instead of it being the husband or boyfriend showing their wife or girlfriend the porn they like. I see a lot of tags on hardcore scenes that say, “female friendly”. These scenes, as transsexual scenes, should have a tag that says, “male friendly”. It would score even higher if they had even 50-60 scenes total. I have watched each and every scene from this site more than a few times each. I will end by saying I nearly listed the Transgressive scenes as a con. Those feel like they’re messing with a good thing they have going with the Transfixed scenes. I can see how it could all come together in the future. There are a few sites now that do that with straight male, straight female, transsexual. If that’s the angle, I believe they could pull it off. |
|
02-09-22 06:44am
Replies (0)
|
Review
55
|
Deeper
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the hottest, sexiest sites I have ever been a member of.
The realization that passionate sex does not require effort. That just means the actors on this site do not seem to be acting.
The quality is very high. Up to 4K on all videos.
There’s some BDSM and minor bondage. It sneaks up on you.
Updates weekly, there are 233 scenes – currently.
Models I either haven’t noticed before or they weren’t as good in the scenes I saw them in as they are on this site. That is very important to this review.
Exhaustive tagging system. |
| Cons: |
There is a 25 scene download per week limit. It sounds low, but I haven’t hit it and have been a member for 6 weeks.
Some people may think is too artsy for hardcore. If it is artsy, it’s the most hardcore artsy porn I have seen. |
| Bottom Line: |
A funny way to start this is to say 116 of the scenes have the “spooning” tag. The tags are entertaining. I usually would not give a graphic description of a scene, but it turned me on that much. The guy is covered with tattoos, which I’m not against, but it’s not a favorite either. The female is a pretty blonde. He rips her shirt open and starts groping her chest. In between gropes there are kisses. The female does a Emmy-award worthy (based on porn standards) performance of acting like she is offended, but intrigued. They end up on the bed. He is behind her, still clothed, they are kissing over her shoulder. He has his hand down her panties. She is rubbing over his jeans. They stand up, he pulls his dick out and there’s pre-cum. This is a pro porn star that was so aroused he was nearing premature ejaculation. All of the scenes are not that good. Nearly all are better than what I’m used to.
There is a darker vibe to the scenes. I would even say moodiness. The first thing I thought was I bet they spend a lot of money on these scenes. The setting is different in nearly every scene. I do wonder on the negative side of it if they’re maybe going too deep. This is from one of the pros I listed. I have never heard of or seen Maitland Ward. She has 14 scenes on this site. I don’t believe I’ve ever seen a porn model with je nais sais quoi until Maitland Ward in those 14 scenes. It seems like she is getting what the site is going for. Most of the biggest stars are on this site like Emily Willis and Kenzie Reeves. Even the guys are well known with Mick Blue and Manuel Ferrara. Somehow this Maitland Ward stands out. If you give this site a try, be sure to look up her scenes. She’s not the prettiest model on the site.
As much as I compliment the tagging system it is filled with overlap. Anything with more than 2 people is listed as group sex. Even though they have threesome tags. It says there are 65 group sex scenes. Most of those are standard threesomes. I did laugh when I saw the spooning tag. They are going for passionate and erotic. I wouldn’t say it’s the most passionate or erotic porn I have seen, but I would say it may be the most erotic and passionate, hardcore porn I have seen. A lot of the scenes make me look at the producers of other porn sites and say, “This is how you do it.” There is a dual penetration scene with little Chloe Cherry and she looks like she loves it. I’m going to take a shot in the dark and say most of these male models are established, older and I believe they understand what the site is going for. I never thought I would say that.
The way the site is setup is for success. There are 233 scenes. Weekly updates. The videos can be downloaded from 160p to 4K. Those are options are on all 233 scenes. The photos are very crisp and nice to look at. You can download those in zips at above-average quality. It is hard to fault anything specific with the site. People are going to say the download limit of 25 scenes per week is a problem. It’s nothing the content is doing wrong. I could see how some may believe there is a repetitiveness. If you like the content, you’re going to welcome repetitiveness.
It's a site I will definitely return to. I am on my second month. I joined it on the holiday promos and let it recur. It has been pointed out. If you join, the 25 scenes per week download limit, starts the day you join. There’s no carryover. You have 7 days to download 25 scenes. It then starts over at 0 and you have 7 days to download another 25. I first started out picking out the 25 scenes I wanted to download. By the end of the first month there were more than 100 scenes total I wanted to download. I will probably have about 170 of the scenes before this month of the subscription ends. That is a different download limit, and you need to be aware that it’s reset every 8th day. They are making sure you come back often. I don’t see anything disappointing about the site for anyone. I have noticed they use something porn usually lacks. They take an otherwise innocent action, like the guy exposing one of the woman’s boobs and make it very dirty. On the other hand, they take something like the dual penetration scene with Chloe Cherry and make it seem acceptable and normal. Very good site. I like it a lot. If they had more scenes. I would join it for a year. |
|
02-09-22 06:42am
Replies (0)
|
Review
56
|
Grandpas Fuck Teens
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A very fun older/younger site with sort of an identity crisis.
There are 470 scenes, the updates haven’t updated since August 2021.
Newer scenes have 4K downloads.
Most of the females look young and cute, fitting the role well.
Most of the males look older, some are chubby and fit their role well.
Very good downloadable picture sets that focus on the female in a more teasing, glamorous way. |
| Cons: |
Some of the grandpas look similar age to the “teens”. I use my imagination, but only then can barely see a 10 year difference.
No new updates and older scenes are lower resolution quality. |
| Bottom Line: |
Older/younger porn is usually fun for me. I am not for sure why. I don’t recognize most of these older men. Usually, the older/younger genre has known, established porn stars in the male roles. These older guys don’t even use a last name. That raises the sexy factor for me. He must have got so excited about the scene he forgot to write his last name down.
As someone that started my interest in online porn through the site Nubiles, a lot of the females on this site remind me of the types of models Nubiles has. That’s a plus for me. Most of these models look like legitimate 24 years old and younger models. I believe those fit into the “teen” category. There are slim figures, small boobs and the older men look happy just to get to touch these young women.
There is a negative in the use of males that look at most 35. I don’t even watch those scenes unless the female is really cute. There are females on here that look like the makeup person tried to add makeup to make them look younger. I know that sounds backwards, but we are talking pink blush on the cheeks which I believe tries to make a woman look younger. It doesn’t really work and if those women really are in the 18-24 age group, the makeup person needs to stop with the makeup. A few of these females look to be in their late 20s, while the guy in those scenes looks mid-30s. That’s pushing my imagination’s limit. What would be the age difference needed? I think you need to at least show a 30-40 year old difference. I can work with a 20 year difference, even.
This is a large site for this genre with 470 scenes. The updates did stop about 5 months ago. Hopefully, they’re not ending the site’s updates and just maybe taking a Covid break. This is very enjoyable older/younger porn. The pictures add another element with those focusing on the female model and have as many as 150 photos each.
The clothing, settings, productive values, are very good for this genre. The really older men wear everything from lounge clothes to overalls, while the “teens” wear cute outfits that make the scenes more believable. I do believe that is part of the problem with the scenes that have the younger guys. Most are dressed in suits. It looks more like extramarital office sex. Porn niches are now hurting each other! It’s a good site. I would recommend it for fans of older/younger. |
|
02-09-22 06:39am
Replies (0)
|
Review
57
|
Vivid
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Much improved user-experience with this great studio’s website.
The search now allows you to search by DVD title and all results show up. Previous versions of the search would split the DVDs up.
Story driven-porn and it’s a near requirement to download each scene from each DVD or you may miss something.
7,048 scenes with no new updates since January 2020, but this is a site I don’t believe the updates are critical to.
Sexy stories, themes, outfits, settings, it has everything I’m usually complaining about other sites not having.
You can randomly download the older DVDs with confidence. That’s how good the classic DVDs are.
Even started adding transsexual content with 78 transsexual scenes mixed in. |
| Cons: |
I am not the most technologically-gifted person, but will note their classic DVD scenes claim to be HD, but I don’t see it. Those have the black fill-in boxes around the video. The classic DVD scenes do look good for the time period those come from.
Still no way to download a full DVD instead of scene by scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
I didn’t know a lot about Vivid until joining Porn Users and noticed a few members talking about the classic scenes. After looking into it, I was not only impressed, I found myself loving every DVD I watched from Vivid. The newer DVDs are good and are 1080p, but the best ones, in my experience, are 2005 and back. It looks like Vivid was at the top of the porn industry and were shooting a style of porn I really enjoy. There is a con with the inability to download the entire DVDs as one file. The older scenes are meant to be watched together. Some of those scenes are only 5-6 minutes but include parts of the story. If they could combine everything from each DVD into one file, I would score the site even higher. As it is, you have to download the scenes separately then either drag and drop them all to play in a row or try to merge them yourself. I use the drag and drop method and find I have to use a different media player than my regular one to get the best results.
These videos are hard to describe as scenes. There is a story and while it’s not that great of a story or that interesting, it shows what dialogue, build-up, maybe a little tension, adds to porn. At least for me. There are also complete series of DVDs that follow the same theme. If you find one you like, you will likely like every DVD from that series. I believe the one I knew of was, “Where the Boys Aren’t”. I remember hearing a few of the big name female pornstars received their big boosts in their careers from that series.
My favorite part of these scenes is the sex. Go figure. They gave me a story, a theme and outfits. I believe those all make the sex parts better. The classic scenes are not like the porn we see today. There is sex that looks like sex, not the sex-Olympics or the let’s see how many positions we can squeeze into a 22 minute scene. Didn’t Prince have a song about that? These scenes look like people having enjoyable sex. More modern porn, gonzo-style, sets out to show 5-6 positions per scene. Vivid’s scenes set out to show the men and women staying in the position that is feeling the best. You see more chemistry between the stars and it just seems more enjoyable to watch and for them to perform.
Fixing the search is a major plus. Previously, you could search for a DVD by name and would get 4 scenes show up. Those would be scene 2, scene 4, scene 5 and scene 8. Whatever they did to remedy it, it worked. You now get all the parts listed in a row for easy download. With the download button on the screen preview, it’s even easier. I did notice the classic scenes show 360p, 720p and 1080p downloads. The 1080p doesn’t look any better than the 720p and is twice the size. I’m not for sure why. The screen is surrounded by black boxes/borders that fill the resolution in. The good new is these are as clear as I’ve seen the classic scenes. It’s worth going back and downloading any classic scenes you have just to get the improved quality. It should be a site everyone joins that gets tired of the porn lacking creativity, humor, clothes, chemistry, story and dialogue. Maybe my favorite part about the scenes – every cumshot isn’t a facial. Lots of body cumshots in the classic scenes. |
|
02-09-22 06:37am
Replies (0)
|
Review
58
|
Footsie Babes
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very good site that shows one fetish leads to another then another.
The female models are very attractive and were my initial interest in the site. The guys are pretty good, too, including some I have heard of which is unusual for me.
662 scenes with 2 updates per month.
Videos and photos and downloadable. Videos up to 4K.
Nice, sexy, sensual feeling to the scenes.
Most scenes are long at least 30 minutes. |
| Cons: |
The older scenes do not have the high-quality videos or photos.
The name could hurt the site, it’s a lot more than foot fetish. |
| Bottom Line: |
I don’t really have any set fetishes I adhere to. I just like fetishes. The flow of fetishes usually finds at least one or two I like in each scene. The foot fetish is not one I’m very familiar with as far as in practice of. I don’t see me offering to give a guy a footjob. Most of the scenes get that action in each scene, but that leads to that flow I talked about. There are blowjobs, vaginal, anal, and that is for me, a good, broad-reaching fetish site. It had its basis fetish with foot but doesn’t stay there. That could be a con for some.
The size of the site is a bonus. Unless you have a problem with lower video quality. The oldest scenes are from 2005 and those only have up to 540p downloads. One thing I want to mention is the high quality of not only the newer scenes videos, but also of the picture sets. As someone that started my interest in online porn through Nubiles, I am used to having high quality videos and photo sets. This site’s photo sets have 150-200 photos in each. The photos sets can be downloaded in zips and the newer ones have photos that are 6700x4200 resolution and crystal clear besides the occasional blurry out of focus shot. The newer videos have all the download resolutions from 160p to 4K. There is a glamourous feeling to this site, and I believe the sensual nature of the foot fetish makes that happen.
The scenes are lacking in the story department, but it’s not hard to create stories in your head for these scenes. You have to think if a woman is willing to wrap her feet around a guy’s dick, that’s the story! It is the secretive advantage of fetish content. The males and female seem to really be into this fetish.
I really like this site and am surprised I am just now discovering it. I may have to look more into this foot fetish content. It seems it sets a softer, gentler tone to the scenes. Maybe it’s because the women are in more control, even? That is not to say this is softcore. Some of these scenes are as hardcore as the anal-fetish sites are. Even at that, some of the scenes, around 70, have anal in them. This fetish is being used properly and well. It’s giving me a reason to believe these actors and actresses are so turned on by exploring their foot fetish, it is lowering their inhibitions towards other fetishes. Not being a fetishist, but knowing fetishists, that does seem to be the real-life appeal of fetishes. The models are also a major bonus. I would recommend the site without hesitation. It covers nearly all major niches thanks to starting each scene with something as unattractive and useless (except for walking) foot. Very enjoyable and entertaining site with impressive quality. |
|
02-09-22 06:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
59
|
Low Art Films
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A studio that I remember joining the site of in 2011. It’s worth looking into.
A mostly lesbian site with some of the biggest names in scenes that most people don’t even know exist.
Good download options considering all of this was released in 2010-2012. All of the scenes have 160p up to 720p.
Getting the chance to see some models before their fame or rise. London Keyes stands out most. Her lesbian scene with Nika Noir is one of the best lesbian scenes I have seen.
There are some male/female scenes.
What you’re looking at most is this was the first steps to porn like we see on Pure Taboo, the lighting, the colors, they are changing moods with the colors. They need a Porn History class in college. If Art History qualifies as college credit, why not porn history? |
| Cons: |
It's a small site and it’s not going to update ever again. It only has 82 scenes, but I admit, I have downloaded 62 of them.
I wonder if other sites have ever looked into this style of filming. This site could even be confusing for people. Heavy on the glam, but there’s some BDSM in it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I didn’t list is a pro or con. This site, from what I remember, was going to feature mostly Asian women. It was going to be “interracial” with one of the women (lesbian scenes) being Asian. Times have changed, I don’t really know why this site stopped. Some of the names of models: Charmane Star, Yuri Luv, Sea J. Raw, Puma Swede who is one of the most attractive, athletically built models. Jayden James who I know was on top of the porn world at one time. Capri Anderson. Shyla Jennings. Capri Cavanni. London Keyes. There is even a male/female scene between Asa Akira and Mr. Marcus. Faye Reagan. Reagan Reese. The scene I remember the most is Alexis Amore and Nikki Rhodes with Mexican-inspired Día de los Muertos makeup. This was one of the sites that someone had a vision about. Maybe it didn’t catch on with the consumer. There is almost nothing to fault in these scenes. I do believe Fame Digital maybe bought it out.
The models are top of the shelf for that time period. The only real facts you need is there are 82 of these scenes that someone gave up on way too soon. I wouldn’t be surprised to know the scenes were busting the budget. The whole idea with these scenes goes into the lighting, the colors, it creates a mood in the viewer. They were already trying too hard at that point. This makes me think of what Bree Mills was producing 12 years ago. It blends so many niches.
There are a few solo scenes. Most of the scenes are lesbian. There are some male/female. You’re not expecting to see light water torture of Jayden Jaymes and Nick Manning during a hardcore scene. It’s here, though. There’s a lot of cosplay. There is bondage. And the best part, the lesbian scenes are as close as I think you can get to calling lesbian porn – hardcore. Rough rubbing and fingering. I had a membership recently to Kink and this looks like Kink meets glam. The scenes are very hardcore. I never expect that from a site with Art in the name, but it is Low Art. I believe the name even tells they were trying too hard. There’s a lot of use of oils on the bodies. The rooms they are in look like a mixture of a Soho Penthouse, a gothic dungeon, a million dollar mansion, a Japanese home and a rundown, dilapidated industrial building. I do think a site like this probably inspired some sites that we rate very highly these days. They were doing the creativity. There’s not a lot of stories in the scenes. Adding the quality of the models makes this a site someone like me will download 62 of 82 videos from. Even though I like solo porn. I don’t really like the solo scenes on this site. There’s clearly something going on in these scenes. The solo women should have been in the scenes with couples having sex and masturbating there.
The download quality is not bad. You can download up to 720p on all the scenes. I'm trying to recollect more about this site from my memory. The first 6 scenes have a title. The rest do not. Those were titled, “Janine and Jessica Dirty Desires”. That is Jessica Jaymes and Janine Lindemulder. It does look like the site was first focusing on them. It then shifted to more Asian models. There is even a very spirited solo scene of Sasha Grey in the old, industrial building setting. I consider this one of my best finds. It is also on Adult Time. That may be the advantage to joining Adult Time for a long period of time. I have had time to go through it more.
The last scene they made was one that worked the lights and colors, I thought, the best they had done. Maybe they didn’t get a big response to it and thought that’s the best they had and gave up. It’s Charmane Star and Yuri Luv. The lighting is soft, one background panel is a bright orange, heavy contrast there. Charmane and Yuri have a lot of face make-up on especially around the eyes. Charmane’s is a brighter red. Yuri’s is a muted blue. Someone was really trying to show the contrast. Very happy to have found this site. |
|
02-09-22 06:30am
Replies (0)
|
Review
60
|
Silverstone DVD
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some really great classic DVD scenes.
Nostalgia is replacing my interest in newer porn. So many of these models are ones I forgot about.
Very large site with 1,203 scenes.
It should appeal to collectors and those that started watching porn in the earlier years of internet porn.
You get Adult Time with it. There’s plenty more porn to look at.
Captures more of the spirit of porn that first interested me in porn. |
| Cons: |
The video quality is not good. It looks like these scenes are all from SD DVDs, 480p is the top option for downloads. I still think nostalgia and the action makes up for it.
It stopped updating in 2019 but was updating regularly and I don’t know why they didn’t improve the quality. |
| Bottom Line: |
Start it off with blame Vivid Classics for taking me back to a simpler time in porn’s history. Who needs gimmicks, domination and fetishes when you can have two very pretty, young, European women using a strap-on with each other? I was expecting the scenes to be in better quality. The Vivid Classics are and it on the same network. I can see the age of these scenes. There’s one with a young Silvia Saint. The ones I remembered are the Girl on Girl scenes. Some of the models look like maybe South American amateurs. Those are very good scenes. I can get by the video quality if the scene is good enough.
I do remember being a member of Silverstone DVD as a standalone site around 2010. I started out with Nubiles and DVD porn was very popular at the time. I would join the different studio sites instead of trying to punish myself with the large DVD sites. I do remember how much I liked these scenes. I thought the studio was long gone. I didn’t even realize it’s on Adult Time.
You get 1,203 scenes. The lesbian scenes are the best ones on the site. One of the first female pornstars I felt attraction to, which scared me – was Dee Baker. She has some scenes on this site including the one I remember well with Jeanie Rivers. This porn is as “dirty” as the porn we are seeing more of these days. Dee rims Jeanie, much more passionate lesbian scenes than the newer scenes have on most site. I don’t know what it says for me when I say I’m not a lesbian, but I really like passionate lesbian porn. It’s not all lesbian. There are straight scenes. Over 500 anal scenes. Most of the performers are well-known porn greats.
It's probably not going to blow you away, but if you like younger women, the smaller, slimmer women like were more common 10 years ago in porn, you will find some scenes on this site that you like. One DVD that I remember so well from this site, the Twins Collection that has the looks to be real twins. The two young, very pretty black twins. That is a niche I remember porn trying to get going about 10-15 years ago. Those DVDs are on here. Those show me something as well. If you like black women and South American women, there are a lot on this site. I know that guys have complained about not enough diversity in models. I nearly downloaded as much from this site as I did Vivid. I’ve still not hit that download limit, but these scenes, being 480p are not very big. Most are around 200 MB each.
Where does nostalgia fit in to today’s world? I like it. The people look like they are having fun. And having orgasms, the women are cute, the guys are masculine. I think everyone should at least watch a scene or two from it just to see the differences between new porn and the classic porn. Half of these scenes have anal, but none of those are hard to watch. That tells me it’s a difference in how the models act. Both male and female. This is equal porn. Most of these men stay out of the camera except the important, needed part. Their enjoyment and pleasure seem to come from how attractive the females are. That’s a lost concept in porn today. Not much reason to check the site anymore after this time, but plenty of reason to if you haven’t. It also shows what porn snobs we have become. We will watch low entertainment value porn in exchange for 2180 pixel videos. |
|
02-09-22 06:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
61
|
Mother Fucker XXX
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A blend of older/younger and cuckolding.
Large site with 914 scenes, but no longer updating.
Good quality downloads on close to half of the scenes.
Some rare videos that I used to have under different names. That could be a big positive with this site.
Nearly all niches of straight porn are covered. |
| Cons: |
Not for sure I agree with the name of the site. There are some scenes that are much older women. Some are just younger women. There’s nothing holding the theme together.
I believe all these scenes come from DVDs. About half of the scenes max out at 480p download. I downloaded some. They look okay if it’s a scene you want.
The navigation is not very good. It’s because of the misleading title and tags. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site caught my eye with some DVDs that I used to have. Those are named differently on this site. The previous versions I had were titled, “Screw My Wife”. On this site those are titled, “Lifestyles of the Cuckold”. I always liked those scenes. If you’re not familiar with those. The older man that is in every scene is what made me recognize the scenes. I don’t know his name, but he is an older, bald man. He gets a little involved in some scenes. The main part of the scenes is a more endowed man having sex with a wife while the husband watches. This older, bald man just sits there and watches too. That was my main reason for even looking at this site. I wanted those and downloaded the near 30 scenes they have just from that series.
Looking further into the site, I noticed there’s no real connection with the theme. There are some older women with younger men scenes. I did not like those very much. I believe that older/younger porn interest is in older men with younger women or older women with younger women. I do not see the excitement from the younger men about having sex with older women. One of the series title tells a lot about the content. It is titled, “I was eighteen, fifty years ago”. Yeah, that’s not too sexy to even watch. There are others that are a little better, the “We wanna gang bang your mom”. It is better.
There are even fucking machines scenes on this site. The models are not that old. Maybe 25-30? I think it's just a site where DVDs have been thrown together as series. I can’t say it’s terrible or that bad. I did download around 50 scenes from it. I don’t even see how the cuckolding scenes fit the theme. Those are gorgeous top-shelf models. I do like the cuckold niche. There is pegging. The women look the same age as the men. Even those gangbang ones, those models look similar age as the men.
Once you get through those everything else seems to be just standard porn. There is interracial and I’m positive the male model is similar age. There is content here that is probably hard to find unless you join a site like Videobox, which I have no interest in trying to sift through. I did notice a series called, “Raunchy Redheads”. I am a natural redhead. We don’t get enough coverage in porn. I checked those out, those are okay, same feeling as the other scenes. One of the female models in the redhead scenes looks maybe 19. The video quality is the only other part to talk about. The scenes from 2010 and before are all 480p. The scenes after 2010, have mobile up to 1080p. It’s a good site to look at once or twice. The part I found funny. The older women on this site are really older. That’s not “mother” porn age. That’s granny. Take it for what it is. You may find some scenes you have misplaced. There are over 900 scenes. I would recommend it for those that like pegging and cuckolding. They have a good selection of those. I know neither of those niches are abundant. |
|
02-09-22 06:26am
Replies (0)
|
Review
62
|
DP Fanatics
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
High quality site for dual penetration fans.
Very high percentage of attractive models.
Newer scenes have up to 4K
Great photosets with high quality and downloadable zips.
658 scenes with 2 new updates per month.
These models make this look sexy and erotic. |
| Cons: |
Older scenes have a drop in quality. The site has been around since 2005.
Not much story, dialogue or subtitles. Communication is usually just moans.
Very professional, may be too glossy for some. |
| Bottom Line: |
European porn seems to be more my favorite. I usually wouldn’t be into a dual penetration site, but with the attractiveness of the female models, and the willingness, enjoyment and nothing too punishing, I really like this site.
The last con is maybe the reason I like the site. Even though the subject matter is of a more hardcore nature, these are pro models and nearly all seem acclimated to doing this type of porn. The models look like they should be on solo glamour sites. It’s a good time to mention the pictures can be downloaded in zips, average of 100 per set and those are 4200x6800 resolution. It’s just an overall feeling of professionalism from the looks of the models to the quality of the content. The videos can be downloaded from mobile to 4K on the newer ones with every option between those resolutions available. The oldest scenes only have 540p as the largest download resolution, but I doubt I will even reach that far back in the site. With 658 scenes and 2 scenes per month it is easy to download 50-100 of the new scenes with the crisp, high-quality video.
I will always mention this since I do prefer a story. There’s just not much story. Two naked guys, a naked woman, three holes counting mouth, two hard dicks, that’s the extent of the story of most of the scenes. The settings are even professional. The colors in the scenes are warm and even bright. I don’t know if it’s just something I have started to notice, but it looks like these models are so used to doing these scenes, they don’t need to talk at all. I believe that’s part of the professional side of it. I would like to see more dialogue. How do two men ask a woman if she wants to have a dual penetration sex scene with them? The scenes are long enough with most averaging in the 30 minute range.
I do think this style of porn probably has two crowds. The one that likes the opposite of this style of dual penetration, where it’s rougher and more of the males controlling the sex. This site does a very good job of convincing me the female is the one controlling the action, the pace, and these models are pretty enough to make that believable. I admit that I am probably stereotyping. I usually don’t think of really pretty, supermodel looking models being in dual penetration porn. Most of these women are just that. They are top of the line looking models. They’re even dressed nicely to start the scenes. Their hair is perfectly done and their makeup. In a way, that kind of makes this porn weird. The woman ends the scene looking like she did at the beginning. Did she even have sex with those two guys? I probably need more exposure to porn like this to really say that this site is as good as it seems to be to me. I’m not used to seeing models this comfortable with 2 dicks in them. I believe they could take a few more. Check it out before joined based on this review. It’s really good to me. Fans of this genre may say it’s too soft or not rough enough. |
|
02-09-22 06:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
63
|
Asshole Fever
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large gaping site that focuses on anal sex (not a favorite mine)
They have 863 scenes. It updates twice per month.
Video downloads do vary with some scenes being old, but the newer ones have up to 4K.
Downloadable videos and picture zips (as long as you pay for the subscription with downloads)
Very pretty models, not exactly the type of models I expect in anal porn. Most are European. |
| Cons: |
It is subjective, I am not a big fan of anal porn, but if you can do more with it than just 25 minutes of anal pounding, it will at least interest me. I find a lot of anal sites, the scenes, come off as punishing. This one doesn’t give me that feeling.
There’s not much variety. That goes for the style of scene, the looks of the models, the body types, the settings. There’s a lot of sameness from scene to scene.
It’s anal porn, that’s all the story you need and get. I’m just being honest, not sarcastic. |
| Bottom Line: |
I will give this site some credit. I usually do not like anal porn sites. I am halfway through a year subscription to Adult Time and am working my way through the sites. This one is acceptable enough anal porn. I want to put laugh out loud. The models are very pretty. Most of my early interest in porn was Nubiles. I am familiar with the European models. Most of the anal sites I see today are American. You have the, am I going too far, brutality of the punishing anal scene? It’s not me condemning it. It’s me questioning if the producers of this type of porn only does what my last con said? You just don’t get a lot of story or build-up or lead-in. It is something I believe porn producers have to start thinking about. It is why I am going to give this site some credit but am also going to talk about the problem I have with this genre and how it is filmed or produced/directed/written. One of the newer scenes is a gorgeous woman named Jayla De Angelis. She is swimming nude; she goes up to her balcony and is masturbating. The neighbor is watching and he’s masturbating. She’s giving him a blowjob by 4 minutes in. Between the 4-minute mark and 10-minute mark, there’s some blowjob, then anal for the last 15 minutes. It seems lazy. I know women that have anal sex with their husband or boyfriends. I have never heard one say, after 9 minutes foreplay, he jumped right in her butt. The bigger picture to what I am saying is, I think the anal focus, plays to such a large fetish for so many men, it lets the producers/directors/writers, just cruise control through the scene.
This site at least has some non-anal content. It will turn to anal before the scene is over and that’s why I am at least giving it some credit. They have another site that is called 21 Erotic Anal. It has 267 scenes on it and I like those. That is figuring into my review of this site specifically, it does look like the producers of Asshole Fever realized to try a more erotic, sensual version of the site with 21 Erotic Anal. I just wished there was something separating foreplay straight to anal.
If you add the 267 scenes on 21 Erotic Anal, you end up with 1,130 scenes, when adding those to the 863 scenes on Asshole Fever. You are going to have to go through those and find the ones that you like. I think the anal genre is geared directly at those that love anal sex. If that’s you, you may love all these scenes. There are good download options from 160p to 4K on the last few years. Before that, HD with 720p and 1080p as the highest options. I can recognize the quality of the scenes. It just depends on if I’m being completely subjective or objective. It’s a good site for what it is. |
|
02-09-22 06:21am
Replies (0)
|
Review
64
|
Immoral Live
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
No download limits
Part of very large Blowpass Network of five sites
Inexpensive because of the Pornusers discount
Porno Dan is a fun guy to watch with a great personality
Beautiful quality 4K downloads that are very fast
Filmed live so it has a feel to it that makes it very real |
| Cons: |
Doesn't seem like something to complain about, but the site is so large. It feels like it should be a separate site.
Camerawork is a little off at times. Probably due to the live part. |
| Bottom Line: |
When we talk about unusual porn, we often pay a site a compliment by saying it is unique. We sometimes also say more unique or most unique. That does not really make much sense to me, but I don’t know what word to use to describe this site. Immoral Live is not immoral in my book and I did not have a chance to see any of the updates when they were live.
When talking about porn in general, unique means the sex act is rare, maybe even taboo or extreme. Here the sex is not all that crazy, but it is fun. The unique part is how it gets there.
The main guy here is Porno Dan, a reasonably good looking guy with a very average dick. By porn standards, he is not much. Most porn studs are better looking, bigger, and full of themselves. He is a stark contrast as he is just a regular guy with a style that makes for the most unique natural porn. He laughs, he jokes, he makes the women relax and really knows how to turn the charm on. Make a woman laugh and you are 90% of the way to great sex in real life or in porn. He does not expect them to do anything he does not do. He eats pussy as well as the most ardent lesbian, with gusto like it is his last meal, and he eats ass too if that helps. His style allows the women to let out that sexual side, that part of them that even pornstars don’t often show. Instead of directing, they have ownership of the action. He motivates them, he does not order them, let alone micromanage them. I have seen them say no, or say do her now or I need a break. Other sites should take note and imitate what works well here.
The site has been around for a very long time and many different approaches to porn have been tried. From 2011 to 2014 he had a single pornstar per update where he used a wheel of fortune to see what sex was going to happen. It was called The Wheel of Debauchery and it was both playful and hot. My favorites were the updates with Nicole Aniston and the one with Sara Vandella. You had the chance to see two pornstars and their personalities like never before.
More recently I was impressed by a few scenes with hot Latinas Serina Gomez and Amy Amor. They did every sex act I can imagine without being downright degrading and did their scenes like they enacting the dreams of their lifetimes. It came across as exactly what they were in the mood to do sexually.
Most of the stars on the site are well known American pornstars of several different races, many I recognized as leading names in the industry. A few were European as I recognized Lady Dee who is a staple if you have ever joined any European sites.
I found the site very easy to use. There are nearly 2300 videos and that leads me to a con that is more of a pro. I want more. I want a new update every day. I want more hours in the day so I can have time for all the great quality scenes available here. Lately the updates are several a month, but not on an exact and predictable schedule. In January there were six. Dan is not in every scene and I want every scene to have him in it. He is now in an age range where he is older, grayer and oh so much more sexy.
When you log in, you can select from among the five in the Blowpass Network. As you can guess from the name, the other sites focus on blowjobs for the most part. As far as I am concerned, I joined for this site and the others are top quality extras. I can honestly rate this two thumbs up and say I love it. |
|
02-09-22 06:18am
Replies (0)
|
Review
65
|
Only Teen Blowjobs
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
You get all five sites of the Blowpass Network
Pornusers has a discount
Lots of very pretty teens
Huge site with 729 videos and photosets
Older men/younger women are common
4K is available on the newest videos |
| Cons: |
Still getting into repetitive.
Do the women not want more in the scenes? |
| Bottom Line: |
Some of the most common porn scenes are ones where a newcomer gives a blowjob to a lucky guy. Every day, women show up at porn studios hoping for a chance to become the next big star. Many get the chance to try their skills on a site like this. You get a lot of fresh faces that have first and in some cases, even their only scenes here. For some they may make a few more videos, but for many they get the honor of being on the site that advertises itself as “The freshest teens in porn”.
The site tries to capitalize on that in a few ways. One is dressing them in a way that creates a feeling of youth. The site says only 18 and 19 year olds. I think these may not all be teens and some look like they are in their twenties. You see them in cut off shorts very often, some are done up in pigtails and some wear revealing tops that seem like an invitation for sex.
To play up the youth factor, they do things we think of as young. They eat cereal, play video games, use cell phones and seem to be someone you could possibly know. They need to borrow a car or money, get help with homework, get out of trouble they caused, do homework with a boyfriend, do babysitting , text while sucking, need their computer fixed , take a selfie while sucking, and the list grows as do the guys. In one scene that I loved, Kenzie Reeves is a cam girl and her boyfriend walks in. A customer gives a tip to give her boyfriend a blowjob on cam. Scenes like this keep the site fresh and modern. It feels like today.
One of the fetishes here is a family one. Her partner is her stepdad or her stepbrother. A great scene I loved had Sloan Harper and Logan Long paired. She is his stepsister and a lesbian, to make things complicated. She owes him fifty dollars and the guy slowly and teasingly “negotiate” a blow job as payment. By the end she is fingering herself to an orgasm as her comes on her. Yikes, that was hot. She is with her father’s friend in some cases. In a few scenes, she even gets revenge on her ex-boyfriend. No matter how they get to the sex, her guy is a little older by a few years. In most of the scenes, I think the age difference is about five to ten years.
Being American models, the models are mostly white, but also Asian, Latinas and black. I loved scenes with the Asian women as I think they give the best blow jobs on camera, maybe in real life too. Lulu Chu is simply great in a scene where she is doing homework with her boyfriend and they take a break. In another she wants some cereal but her boyfriend drank the milk. She knows where she can get some more without a trip to the store.
The guys are ok, but not the biggest or the best. They are just there and that is not really a criticism as the ladies are and should be the stars. They have the skills in many cases and in others they don’t, but that natural enthusiasm kicks in. Some of them for sure use up a whole day’s worth of calories. Who needs the gym to stay fit if your boyfriend wants a blowjob?
With a large archive of 729 videos and photosets, there is plenty to see here. This year there has been only on new update, but December had three. You also get three other blowjob sites as well as immoral Live, a site that is one of my all time favorites. |
|
02-09-22 06:14am
Replies (0)
|
Review
66
|
Mommy Blows Best
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of five site network , Blowpass. There are four large blow job sites in it
Inexpensive to join
Mostly older women and younger men. Mostly experienced pornstars that have years in the industry.
Great bodies and professional performances and the guys fit the theme
As of today, there are 560 videos available |
| Cons: |
Can be repetitious as there is not a lot of variety you can do with a focus on blow jobs.
It is hard to tell when it will update. January had none, but December had four
The oldest videos are not Full High Definition. |
| Bottom Line: |
The same sex act can get boring rather quickly. The better sites have to have more going for them than just the obvious. I feel that Mommy Blows Best is one of the better blowjob sites because it has much that appeals to my imagination.
The age of the women here is MILF, not necessarily a family relationship like stepmother. There are scenes with a stepmother and a stepson, but there are also scenes with a stepdaughter and her boyfriend. Around fifteen scenes have the two women together in a lesson to show the young lady how to do it properly. These were some of my favorites out of all the 560 or so that the site has.
Being older, the women have a confidence level that younger porn models just don’t have. These are mostly, if not all, pornstars that have been around in the industry since they were young. For them a great blow job is second nature and can do a hot scene with ease. Sometimes the scenes can seem repetitive as a result, but then again the site has a deeper appeal to many fetishes. Being older, they can be identified with by showing that sexy side of all women that comes out as we reach our second sexual peak. Teens show enthusiasm, but MILFs have the hormones and have the benefit of experience, but in spades. Being older and more confident, we know what we like and what we need. The women on this site see men as sexy conquests to be there for our pleasure and enjoyment. Younger men who are not so experienced or jaded from a lot of sex can be attractive. Older women and younger men is a fetish that can be appreciated by women of all ages. This may be an unlikely pairing in real life, but as a porn fantasy it is fun to watch.
Older women are filled out and have bodies that may not be the perfect ones if you prefer thin models. Some of these models are quite, let’s say voluptuous, full figured and very real. Big breasts are to be found everywhere and a few are unfortunately enhanced ones. This body shape works well as for those with a uniform fetish. Sexy housewife or office workers in short skirts and pantyhose, teachers that are well dressed in less revealing clothes that emphasize their shape, all work well for me. Nicely done hair and makeup, a blouse that is too tight, and just the right shoes and you have my attention.
Mostly the scenes involve a kind of power and age difference. Teacher and student, boss with employee, nurse and patient, landlord and tenant are just a few attention grabbers. The age difference makes for hot older and younger. The guys seem to be surprised as well as flattered, not entitled, when the women are interested in them.
A few of the guys are black men, but really only a few. The women are the real stars here and some are Asian, or Black, but nearly all of the stars are white. There are lots of big names from the past when they were younger and some I have never seen before and wish I had.
I see in the oldest videos that there is a male star that is in nearly every video way back then. They give his name as Jack H. I have heard of him, but have never seen him, as he is from before my time. I heard he used to have his own site, something very few male performers can say. He seems to be a good looking, very nice guy, well endowed even by porn standards and his cumshots are a joy to watch. His name is Jack Hammer, and I like his toolbox. I just wish the video quality had been better back then.
The sets are mostly indoors in a kitchen or dining room, or in an office. The sets enhance heat in the scenes and are just beautiful. The downloads are fast and the 4K quality quite impressive. Not only are there 560 videos, a rather large number, the other sites in the network are mostly excellent blowjobs as well. |
|
02-09-22 06:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
67
|
Men Over 30
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very large gay site that has some very large men on it.
The site has 1,373 scenes and is updating twice per month.
Good categories that helped me find 25 solo videos.
Not a typical gay male site except for the sex. Big, athletic, even burly men.
I have to think this is one of the oldest, still active gay sites, the earliest scenes are from 2005.
Newer scenes have up to 4K |
| Cons: |
As burly and masculine as these men are there are only 25 solo scenes out of 1,373. I do think the number is higher. The oldest scenes don’t seem to be tagged.
Starting to realize gay sex only has two places to stick it.
Oldest scenes are only 480p. |
| Bottom Line: |
I thought seeing two big, burly, masculine men, naked and rolling around together would be sexy. It is some of the scenes. Some of the scenes are a reminder that most men are not near as flexible as women.
The standout for me are the 25 solo scenes. This is good, male solo porn. Maybe it’s because they’re older? I am very confident there are more than 25 solo scenes too. The last one listed when using the solo category is from 2012. The site’s content goes back to 2005 and two of the oldest scenes are solo. It looks like they just started tagging around 2012. Big, burly, bearded guys masturbating is almost as good as I expected it to be. These guys give the imagination enough to work with and convince ourselves they are masturbating for us women, but then they’ll decide to hop up on their knees and spread their butt cheeks for the camera. The solo scenes are good.
The sex scenes are better than on other gay sites I have watched. The main reason is these guys are masculine and don’t make me feel like a man is more flexible than I am. I watched one gay scene from another site where the guy was having anal from a split. These scenes let me at least think and imagine these are guys in jail and they’re just having sex with each other until they get out and can find a woman. It’s more believable than most guys watching 4 gorgeous lesbians and thinking they’re going to invite him to join them!
This site is really good and more updated than most gay sites I’ve been a member of. You have the 4K video downloads. Two updates per month. Over 1,000 scenes backing the updates. It also has very good navigation. The categories section is helpful as are the tags. It’s not a cluttered site and only one small ad at the bottom of the pages. It just has a real professional feel to it. I would like more solo scenes, but solo gay just doesn’t seem very popular. Am I just delirious for thinking guys masturbate a lot? If you look at the porn industry, it makes it look more like women are the only ones masturbating. |
|
12-08-21 03:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
68
|
Pride Studios
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large gay network of 11 sites.
The network averages 3-4 updates per week.
As a whole, there are 5,047 scenes and 890 male models.
The scenes over the last few years have up to 4K downloads.
There are pictures that can be downloaded. |
| Cons: |
Really poorly named sites that do not offer what the names of the sites say.
Less than 100 solo scenes across the entire network. |
| Bottom Line: |
I only felt one of the sites from this network deserved its own review and I will admit, it is because I not only prefer solo gay, it is really the only gay porn I can get into. This is a good network for gay porn. It’s not that good for straight women looking to get in on the naked men part of gay porn.
The site names could be the most misleading part of the network. One of the sites is named Circle Jerk Boys. It has 1,055 scenes on it. Of those 1,055 scenes, the categories show 45 scenes with masturbation and 4 scenes listed as “orgy”. There are no tags for “group” or “circle jerk”. And looking at the scenes, all I see are ones with two guys having sex.
They weren’t done there. They also have a site called Boyz Party. Looking at the categories on it there are no tags for group or orgy and it lists 3 masturbation scenes with 0 solo scenes. I can see 8 solo scenes on the first page. As professional as everything newer on the network is, these other sites seem to have been left out of the professionalism. The Boyz Party really looks like it could be a good site, it’s just none of the tags or categories are right on it.
The other sites on the network would be good choices for gay men. This network seems to be focused on the gay relationship, love, romance and there are even stories in the scenes. There are plenty of handsome guys on Men Over 30, Extra Big Dicks and I found the Pride Originals to be interesting. It has interviews and the sex scenes are scripted. Sometimes, I think scripted could be better for porn.
Compared to most of the gay sites I have joined, the quality of the videos and photos is much better on Pride. I really could be running into a wall where I cannot relate to what gay men like. Are gay men really that different in sexual interests than straight women? I’m basing that on it seems straight men and lesbians like the same things when it comes to women.
I would recommend it to gay men. I would recommend it to straight women if my separate review for Men Over 30 sounds good to you, but if not, I really believe this network is for gay men. It’s possible even the Pride word being in the title could be telling us that. |
|
12-08-21 03:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
69
|
Next Door Male
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The biggest male masturbation site I have ever seen!
There are 605 scenes on the site. The categories/tags only show 593 solo, but I haven’t seen a scene yet with anything except solo.
Videos are downloadable and unlimited. There are also downloadable photo zips.
A lot of the guys seem to be straight/bisexual and masculine.
The guys make masturbating look like an artform, ball rubbing, slow strokes, twisting strokes, who knew you could do that much with male masturbation?
You don’t need a story when you can look at the pictures and know what the story is about. |
| Cons: |
It’s not updating, but with 605 scenes, it will take me several months just to download those.
More talking could help, but it could also hurt. I think that’s something gay porn site may face a bigger problem with than straight sites. (Personality shows, effeminate/masculine shows) |
| Bottom Line: |
I don’t think there is a site like this anywhere on the internet. I don’t know if it’s aimed at women or gay men. Maybe that’s another reason the guys shouldn’t talk much? The scenes are simple which is something of a complaint. I would at least like to know what the guy is thinking about while masturbating. Or maybe I wouldn’t, especially if it’s not what I want to think he’s thinking about. This is such a new, unique site to me.
The scenes have a simple flow and purpose to them. It’s a guy that needs to cum. There are zero production values. The guy lays down or sits down. Gets hard, pulls his dick out and starts stroking it. I have heard men say women have it easier with masturbation. Not based on these scenes. These guys stroke along for 8-15 minutes, make a mess, clean it up and scene is over. There is hardly no change from positions, unlike female solo, where the female goes from missionary, up on knees, to give better views. These guys mostly stay in one position. There are some scenes where the guy will also play with his butthole, but those are not common.
The part I find most interesting are the guys. A lot of these guys do not give me the feeling of them being gay or bisexual. There are hairy chests and bellies, not really a lot of muscular guys or really big guys. Most are in the average male body size category. A lot have beards. One part I wasn’t expecting is most of these guys are not much more than average in dick size. I prefer that even in porn. The guys are (just based on my eyes) 5.5” to 6.5” and only a few look to have a large circumference. I am probably not thinking about the name of the site. It is Next Door Male. Maybe that is the whole goal? These are the guys that live next door and not professional porn stars?
If I was going to critique it, which I really don’t want to since I enjoy the site so much, it would just be to add something to the scenes. Maybe have the guy watching porn? Looking at sexy pictures? I know enough men to know that it’s not as normal for a man to just lay down and start masturbating as it is for a woman. But that is what these guys do. Some of the scenes do have the guy looking at something, but you can’t see what. That is the only major negative critique I have. It makes it feel like not the guy next door and instead, the guy that is just rubbing one out to get paid. I don’t know much about this network or if they are going to start updating it again. Currently, the whole network seems close to dead. The size of this site and the network at least gives it a few months’ value. I believe it could appeal to both straight women and gay men, which is the demographic porn needs to improve their focus on. One of my new favorite sites. |
|
12-08-21 02:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
70
|
Austin Wilde
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very attractive, masculine-look, gay solo model.
There are only 18 solo scenes, but they do something on this site that I do enjoy and that is two guys masturbating together. Surely that really happens?
Good download quality with most of the scenes having up to 1080p
A total of 114 scenes, some of the gay sex scenes on this are good. I’m shocked by how my back arch some of these guys have.
The pictures are downloadable, but I would only say they are okay. |
| Cons: |
I was pretty sure I had this figured out. Solo gay models are listed as solo because they are in all the scenes on their site which makes it a solo model focused site, right? Not really. This one is advertised as solo masturbation. But only 1/6 of the scenes are solo masturbation.
Nearly half the scenes are “on the set” which I know from female porn sites, are usually called, “behind the scenes”. It does cut the amount of sex scenes down some. |
| Bottom Line: |
If there was going to be one of these solo gay models, I really wanted to be a solo masturbation model, Austin Wilde was it. He’s very handsome, he doesn’t have a too masculine look, but he looks like an athlete. He has a little bit of a rugged look. And his solo scenes are very good. I don’t know if he is that greatly endowed or if it’s where he’s so athletic looking. I know a lot about size perception. You figure this stuff out when you watch enough men masturbating in porn.
The gay sex scenes are some of the better ones on this network, at least for me. I think the whole attraction to the site is Austin Wilde. It doesn’t seem to matter whether he’s in the top or bottom role, he's almost always erect. That plays a big part in enjoying a sex scene that you really can’t even fantasize being in. I don’t know how these scenes would be viewed by gay men. I have learned a lot though I am not for sure porn fans are the best or most qualified teachers. Austin does everything. He takes anal, he gives anal, he takes oral, he gives oral. And I would say he seems to be the last “gay” of these solo models but I’m going to guess I am wrong.
His solo scenes are very good. This is how I believe a man masturbates. He’s not too preoccupied with looking good while doing it. He doesn’t spend as much time trying to show his body off. I don’t think he is that large in endowment, but I could be wrong. He’s kind of hard to tell how big his build is. He reminds me a little of Vin Diesel. I think for a female viewer there’s a good chance for the physical attraction. And he’s not as dominant acting as his build says he could be. I believe he is one of the more entertaining male models to watch masturbate. This is one of the ones I would definitely recommend for straight women. I want to believe he is well-liked by straight women and gay men. It’s just too bad there’s not more solo scenes of him. The video quality is very good. Maybe the first 10-12 scenes only have 480p downloads. The rest have up to 1080p and his scenes are a little longer. I noticed several go over 20 minutes. I liked the one a lot, but I don’t know where else to find content of him. I would like to see him in bisexual scenes with another man and a woman. |
|
12-08-21 02:37am
Replies (0)
|
Review
71
|
Next Door Raw
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Gay site that involves bondage, domination and some impressive bodies.
Updates once per week, the site has 375 scenes on it.
Most gay sites are going to interest me with solo scenes, this one has 0, but this does seem to be a different take on gay porn than I’m used to.
The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and mobile versions of the downloads.
The realization, after reading scene comments, there are as many aggressive gay porn fans as straight ones. |
| Cons: |
The realization, after reading scene comments, there are some gay porn fans completely disgusted by the idea of a woman watching gay porn.
The titles of the scenes read like poor Erotica quotes, “Cum Breed Me”? Really?
Tries way too hard to establish dominance and submissiveness without using real human nature. There’s a therapist inside me. |
| Bottom Line: |
More so than any other site on this network, this one is filled with combative comments from the members, and it reached the level, for me, of making it unappealing. This reminds me a lot of the Kink Men sites. These scenes are the most creative I have seen in gay porn and there is the establishing a role which you rarely see in porn. The first problem for me was there are no solo scenes. Reading the comments kind of made that clearer to me. There were a lot of comments about wanting to see real gay chemistry in the scenes. That’s not going to happen in solo gay porn. If gay porn fans are having problems enjoying scenes with multiple men having sex, they probably don’t enjoy solo men either. That’s why it hard to find solo gay men porn. I guess I need to branch out to transsexuals.
The scenes on this site almost all revolve around establishing a role. There is bondage, there is even physical dominance and you get the ones with the guys who like being the submissive and I can only think to say, those scenes are cute. It’s cute watching a man be submissive and seductive. I did notice the one solo model I liked a lot was receiving a lot of hate. Maybe I’m sensing that he’s not really gay and the gay fans don’t like him. This site does show some of the technological advances of the network. Most of the sites I have reviewed on it are not updating. This one is and it is once per week and they have up to 4K on the newer scenes. It just looks like gay solo porn has died.
These scenes have some appeal to me. Some of the guys are very attractive and I think the roughness and aggressiveness of the scenes are shooting those testosterone levels up and you’re getting to some very impressive erections. I don’t have as much interest in how the scenes play out or end. This is not good porn for a straight woman. The scenes I watched showed more of a love/fascination with each other than I am used to seeing in gay porn. I’m not for sure if that’s what gay men want either. I know that I like softer hardcore in male/female porn, but I don’t have interest in seeing the male and female seem fascinated with each other and in love. I will recommend this site to gay men. I won’t to straight women. I will also it has made me think twice about gay porn unless I know there are solo scenes. There are only so much nice bodies can cover. Some of these guys are more obnoxious than the straight guys that we normally associate with being obnoxious. Not my cup of tea. |
|
12-08-21 02:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
72
|
Samuel O'Toole
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Finally, a male solo model that lives up to his name!
121 scenes with 21 being solo, 10 being with women and the rest being two or more guys together.
Videos can be downloaded from mobile size up to 1080p. Only a few of the oldest videos are in lower resolution.
Pictures that can be downloaded.
Good performer, he gets strong erections and has big cumshots. |
| Cons: |
No tag or category for the scenes with women. It’s a gay site with a “gay” tag, isn’t that implied? But no tag for the scenes with women?
There is such a fine-line when discussing this part: The “gay” scenes are really gay. I am just trying to help both females considering it and gay males too.
The guys they put with him are not very attractive and most seem dominated by him. I noticed a comment on one video asking if Sam “ever takes the dick”. That could be what I’m noticing too. |
| Bottom Line: |
Samuel O’Toole is at least close to that “hunky” group of men. He’s big built, looks well above-average endowed, athletic looking and he has a little arrogance.
I want to explain the “really gay” comment. There is one scene where a smallish guy walks in the room and sits on Samuel’s lap like he’s Santa Claus. When Samuel pulls the guy’s pants down he has a bow on his dick and says, “You don’t have to wait for your package.” I like corny sense of humor, puns, but that “joke” just seems like it belongs in the Lifetime Virgin Hall of Fame. The scenes seem forced. I pay attention to the comments on the scenes. I figure those are left by gay men and I’m curious to see how much of what I see, they see. Nearly every comment is about Samuel being too dominant, it’s about him not bending over for the other guys and that’s what I mean by forced. I’m not fully believing this is a gay or bisexual man. He is in charge of all scenes. Even with the women. It’s more like watching one guy dominate the other guy than watching sex.
The solo scenes are better. Am I going to get booed for saying his arrogance that is noticeable in all scenes shows most in how much he enjoys touching himself? I won’t fault his performance ability. He gets a strong, upward curve erection and just guessing is at least 7” looks to be above average circumference. He himself looks like he’s probably 6’2” 200+ pounds of muscle. And it will always be an important part to me, he has the impressive cumshots. I don’t see me keeping anything more than the solo videos. I don’t even enjoy his scenes with women. He seems to turn caveman when others are involved.
The site is decent sized with 121 scenes, but I’m only going to keep 21 of those, I would recommend it to gay men that are into being the bottom role and like being dominated. For females, the 21 solo scenes are good. I’m piecing together my own collection of solo male scenes. That makes 21 better than 0. If we could just switch his attitude and personality with some of these other guys. |
|
12-08-21 02:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
73
|
Trystan Bull
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I will readily admit, I was expecting a big, muscular, brawny guy. He’s good-looking and it’s not just gay scenes. He’s not big, muscular and brawny.
These gay solo sites seem to have more of the type of material I like and this one has some. Though, the use of the word “solo” in gay porn is different than straight porn.
It has 110 scenes, and the downloads are unlimited.
Some of these guys make me wonder how “gay” they are. Which goes into the content I like.
Easy to cancel, uses a version of Gamma’s billing. |
| Cons: |
There’s a distinct difference between the gay, bisexual and solo scenes. The gay scenes are not good even for a straight woman. This guy does not seem like he’s into gay sex.
Scenes are too short, a lot are under 20 minutes.
Some of the categories don’t make much sense – non-nude and softcore? |
| Bottom Line: |
The name Trystan Bull makes me think of a large, muscular, bald, powerful man. A+ for the Marketing Team. Trystan is an average sized guy that looks like he could maybe be an extra in a Marvel movie. I don’t know if the compliment shows in that. He is handsome. He has that superhero actor look.
The site is one of the most confusing gay sites I have ever been on. There are 15 scenes with women. There are 28 solo scenes too. That’s nearly half of the site’s scenes. Trystan seems to be more into the women than the men. And it has one scene that I think would be perfect way to blend porn for gay men and straight women. Trystan is looking through a gloryhole at a very muscular man who is masturbating. That wall between the guys keeps some of the gay parts since it’s two men and it keeps them just far enough apart that they are not as obviously gay for the women viewers. These 43 scenes with women, solo and this one gloryhole scene really helps the score of this site. If I was more attracted to Trystan, the score would be even higher.
There is bad news: The scenes are short. I think one was over 30 minutes. The rest are under 20 minutes and some are close to only 10 minutes. The ten oldest scenes also only have 240p and 480p downloads. The rest have everything up through 1080p, but no 4K. The picture sets are okay, but you can’t download those.
The good news besides the HD videos is the women are really pretty. Which also leads me to wonder about how much Trystan is more into women. Usually when you see a woman in a scene with a “gay” man or bisexual men, they can be pretty, but are usually average looking. The women on here, at least one, I think is a big star. And most of the women look like they could be stars themselves.
I do like the way they film the solo scenes. Some sites do the male solo scene in the least visually impressive way with the guy sitting on a couch or recliner. Trystan’s solo scenes include outdoors, on the porch of a house, it could be a major difference in female and male solo scenes. I want to think I could just accidentally walk up on a guy masturbating. While, I think the female masturbation scenes try to give you the feeling of the female invited you to watch her. Trystan’s have that more spontaneous feel to them.
I am going to score this site higher based on how much I liked the 43 scenes I pointed out. It seems like porn anymore is more about finding scenes you like instead of just taking a chance. To add what I was saying about the difference between solo male and female scenes, the solo male niche doesn’t seem to have anything to do with “solo” except every scene features the main star. It could be with other people. I know from my first porn site job ever, Nubiles, about 12 years ago, solo female porn means masturbation. Just when I say that they’ll change it on me. Good site if you like the sound of the 43 scenes I described. |
|
12-08-21 02:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
74
|
Next Door Casting
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The first time I’ve seen a gay casting site. It has his plusses and minuses.
There are 76 scenes that feature a short interview, some solo play, then some sex.
The video quality is very good. All 76 scenes have up to 1080p downloads.
The interviews can be too much information or interesting. A very different vibe from female casting videos.
Has at least one part I will talk about later in the review that is a major turn-on for me and I think for other straight women. |
| Cons: |
I don’t know if they stopped updating or the Covid problems possibly halted production of these scenes. I mention Covid only because these are supposed to be amateur male models. I assume most pro models are tested.
One thing I will never find sexy is a male stripping and teasing like a stripper. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has a feature that I see as a major turn-on. It really could just be one for me. The guys start off dressed and walk into an office. They are not aroused. The difference in the grow-er and show-er dick. That is fascinating for me to see and watch. Some of the guys drop their pants and underwear and look to be 2-3 inches at most, within a minute or two, they have grown to 5-7 inches. There’s a lot of turn-on in that for me. I don’t have the same turn-on with the show-er type. You also get at least some masturbation at the beginning of the sex casting part.
The interview can be interesting. Some of the guys say they are really bisexual. Others talk about when they knew they liked guys. Maybe it’s just that I haven’t seen gay casting before that makes this so interesting to me? I am used to female casting sites where the questions tend to be, “When did you lose your virginity? How old were you when you started masturbating? What is your favorite position?” These interviews are going into topics I can’t say I have even heard gay men I know talk about.
The sex in the scenes doesn’t seem as genuine as in the sex in the scenes on their other sites and that now makes me question female casting videos. These gay casting videos seem more like the casting director is trying to really see what the aspiring model can do, while female casting seems to be more about the casting director just getting sex.
the site stopped updating right around the time Covid became a pandemic. I hadn’t even thought about the possibility of how a casting site with amateurs could be forced to stop. I don’t know if pro models stay tested so it’s not a problem but bringing someone in off the streets into an enclosed office and exchanging bodily fluids would make the risk even higher. This is a site I would like to see continue or some other site to try. The interviews are interesting, even the too much information ones.
I don’t think this site would convince anyone to join the network, but it is the only time I’ve seen a casting site for gay porn. With the getting to watch the grow-er grow added, it made it a site I liked. |
|
12-08-21 02:25am
Replies (0)
|
Review
75
|
Next Door Buddies
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large site with a sports, athletic, jocks theme.
Updates 3 times per month and has 816 scenes on it.
Videos can be downloaded as can photo zips.
Handsome, athletic guys, but may be more directed at gay men than women.
Categories, search by model, are the main navigation features. |
| Cons: |
Only 17 scenes are listed as solo and I’m not for sure there are even that many. The solo ones show multiple guys.
Scenes are repetitive. |
| Bottom Line: |
I prefer solo scenes, but these scenes have at least some parts I like. There are naked, masculine men with erect penises. Why is it men don’t have to go through this? Someone really needs to make porn sites aimed at women. The site gives me the feeling of quantity over quality. Please understand that a gay man might see this differently than a straight woman. Some of these scenes are borderline romantic. There’s hugging, cuddling, kissing, and as much as I support those actions, it’s not why I join a gay porn site. The good news is these guys are mostly young, fit and athletic. They get impressive erections, and this is how I always feel about gay porn. I like most everything up until the sex. The sex on here looks like a couple in love. I can’t fantasize about being between two gay men that are in love with each other. I guess I could, but they wouldn’t be too happy about it!
The site is large and it’s just my thinking that is why the scenes are repetitive. There are 816 scenes, each has videos and photo zips. The download options on the videos are 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K on the scenes from the last few years. The photos are generic feeling. There are 20-40 pictures in each set. The first 5-6 are pictures of the guys in clothes. Then 5-6 taking their clothes off. The rest are of the sex.
The categories could be confusing for someone thinking there are a lot of scenes a woman might like. They show 492 scenes with the masturbation tag. Only 329 with rimming. I really don’t know if these categories are very accurate. There are only 610 scenes listed as gay porn, but the site has 816 scenes. What are the other 206 scenes if not gay porn? A gay male friend told me the easiest way to tell if the scenes are just marketed at gay men and not women is to look at the categories on body types. There are 80 “hairy” and only 15 listed as “beefy”. It seems hairy, beefy guys are more for the women to look at. I feel really dumb explaining that as a woman. It does seem like those categories might hold the secret to figuring out the type of “gay” porn I can expect from a site. The two that didn’t help at all are 187 scenes with “big muscles” tag and 164 with “slim” tag. My best description of the males on this site is “pretty boys”. All in all it’s not bad and it has enough scenes you’re sure to find something you like. |
|
12-08-21 02:22am
Replies (0)
|
|
