Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : LKLK (0)

Feedback:   All (518)  |   Reviews (162)  |   Comments (40)  |   Replies (316) Other:   Replies Received (290)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 201-225 of 247 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 201 Girls Under Arrest (0) 59.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Girls Under Arrest is a series or channel on the Adult Time network. Membership in the Girls Under Arrest channel gives you access to the rest of the Adult Time network, and vice versa. -PU has a discounted price for the first month of of $14.05, recurring at $29.95/month. -Porn sites are constantly looking for a new idea to make thier content seem fresh and appealing. This site features young girls who have problems with the law. -Each video has an accompanying photoset that captures the action. There is a zip file for the photoset, and also for the video. -The channel has all the features of the Adult Time network: -Login and member pages are secure (https). -You can stream or download the videos in multiple definitions: from 160p through 1080p. -Video runtime is from 28 to 44 minutes. -Videos have a matching photoset that is zipped. Around 35 photos per photoset. Cons: -The major con is this is a small site: only 11 videos. -The site is an archive site. Started 2018-08, last update 2019-04. -The videos are shot POV style. Which allows for dark scenes, poor lighting, shifty camera angles, poor focus on the models because the models are moving and the camera-operator has to jiggle the cameria to follow the action. -The photosets have a zip file, but only one definition for the zip file. -Photosets download with a default generic numbered file name, that should be renamed if you want to know who the models are, what the scene represents. -But the truth is, these photosets are not worth keeping. Although the video definitions range from 160p through 1080, the value of the videos is poor. Unless you enjoy watching cops abusing young girls into blowjobs and harsh fucking, in dimly lighted videos. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Bottom Line: I respect the law, and know that law enforcement officers are among the finest, bravest citizens in our great country. I can re-count some instances of where my family inter-acted with the law and was able to see how wonderful police officers can be. I live in a condo association. Sometimes the US mailmen make a mistake and delive a piece of mail to wrong mail box. I brought a piece of mail to my neighbor, and told him it was his mail, delivered to my mail box. This was a strong, good-looking cop. He kept his right hand in his pocket the entire time I spoke with him, instead of shaking hands with me. Did he have a small gun in his pocket, in case I was a criminal? Better safe than sorry. I'm an older man, now in my 70s, in poor health, so I don't think I'm much of a threat. But the cop kept his hand in his right pocket the entire time I was at his door. Also, he asked me where I got his mail. Implying that maybe I stole it, which would be a federal crime. My explanation that the mail delivery people sometimes put mail into the wrong box didn't seem to impress him. And he was right to be suspicous. I could have jimmied his mail box and stolen the letter. Even though I didn't open it, I could have been using the letter as a trick to become friendly with him, as the beginning of a scam. Cops are taught to be suspicous of people. My action of bringing him a piece of his mail could have been a setup for some crime. Did he thank me for giving him the mail envelope? No. He took it, and shut the door. No thank you. Another time, I saw the inside light on his truck parked on his driveway was on, and the truck was empty. I knocked on his door, told him the inside light on his truck was on. He went out and turned off the light. No thank you. No sense of appreciation. I guess I was lucky he didn't arrest me for coming onto his property. Maybe he could have shot me, as a dangerous suspect, if he was having a bad day or wanted to blow off steam. A different time I was walking for exercise in my neighborhood. Two cops stopped me, asked what I was doing. I told them I was walking for exercise. I'm almost 70 at the time, not a big or threatening guy. They asked me if I was on probation. I said no. They asked me again if I was on probation. I said no. They asked me again if I was on probation. I said no. Then they asked me if I was off of probation. I said no. They asked me what my job was, I said I was retired. They asked what my job was before I retired. I gave them my wallet, to show that I lived one street over from the current location. That might have been a mistake, because I didn't ask before I reached for the wallet in my back pocket. They could have shot me for reaching for a weapon. The asked me a few more questions, and let me go. This was around 2:30 PM, broad daylight. There was no curfew or law against walking on public sidewalks. You read in the paper where cops shoot unarmed people, sometimes killing them, because the suspect seems dangerous and the cops need to protect themselves. This happens a lot, because in United States, cops are rarely punished for killing an unarmed suspect. What is a suspect? A suspect is anyone a cop encounters who is not a cop wearing a cop uniform with a badge and gun. The motto of the police where I live is "To protect and to serve". But I've never felt served or protected when I meet a cop. A cop is an authority figure, with a gun, and if you don't do exactly what he says, you need to have a lawyer with you, or the cop's right are more powerful than your rights. That's on a practical basis. Many years ago, back in the 1970s, I was walking down a public street, on my way to a black college library. A cop pulled his car in front of me, I stopped walking, the cop got out of the car, asked me where I was going, I told him I was going to the library. He told me to lean my hands on the car, and ran his hands over my body. Then he said he hadn't searched me. I didn't say anything. He told me to get into the car, I did, and he drove me to the library. It was a black community college library. I'm white. He talked to someone, and told me I could never go back to the library again. The public library was a few miles away. The black college library was within a few blocks from where I lived. But I never went back to the black college library. What could I do? Hire a lawyer, which costs money, so I can go the library that is closest to me? I had very little money. A cop tells you something, you do it. It's not worth being arrested for going to a black college library. I have no criminal record. Except for some traffic tickets. But if a cop tells you to do something, the smart thing to do is to say "Yes, sir" and do it. Anything else can you can get into trouble. Anyway, this site doesn't get into the real nitty gritty of dealing with cops. This site features actors playing good ol' boy cops who are looking for kicks and maybe a little sex on the side. REVIEW CONTINUED IN REPLY: 04-18-20  10:04am Replies (8) Review 202 Beauty Angels (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU has a discounted price of $14.95/month recurring. -Site is part of the Teen Mega World network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites in the network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for. -Navigation is easy. You can switch between sites in the network, without having to re-login with username and password. -There is a good models listing, that has a nice thumbnail of each model, with hot links to her content at the entire network, not just to the Beauty Angels site. However: the model listing at each site only includes the models at that site, and not the entire network. If you want a model listing of the entire network, you have to switch to the Teen Mega World site, which does have a model listing that includes all the network models. -The site updates with 1 video and photoset per week. Which is an amazing update rate, since the other 5 video/photoset updates are scattered over the rest of the network each week. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -The site (and network) features Eastern European models: almost all white, mainly slender, ranging from attractive to lovely, even though not a lot of effort is put into making the girls glamourous: the models are just fresh, young, naturally attractive teens. That is one of the strengths of the site and network: how attractive these teens are. -The girls are naturally attractive. Almost no fake boobs. You can find a lot of these models at the Wow Girls/Wow Porn sites. The Wow Girls/Wow Porn models are among the cutest, most attractive teen models on the internet, which is one of the strengths of those sites. The Wow Girls/Wow Porn sites put a little more effort into making their models appear attractive: I wouldn't call the Wow Girls/Wow Porn sites glamour sites, because I think a glamour site requires a glamour approach or maybe a heartcore approach with a little romance, and the Wow sites are straight sex with little romance or glamour. Bottom Line: PROS(CONTINUED): -No download limits. No streaming limits. -Videos for the last few years can be streamed from 360p through 2160p. -Videos for the last few years can be downloaded from 360p through 2160p. They started offering 2160p videos around June 2016. They started offering 1060p videos around May 2014. The site started around 2011, when they were offering 360 -720p, I believe. This makes a difference if you insist on higher quality definition to watch a video. CONS(START OF): -I think the cons are minor. This is one of my favorite hardcore teen sites, and I've been a continuous member for several years. -They advertise a discount for the first month of $7.49, which is called an "Easter Discount". Edit: this is misleading. The $7.49 for the first month, is for a year-long membership, which costs $89.95 for a year, recurring. I think this is a trick that porn companies often do, quoting a 1-month membership for a low price, and you don't find it's for a year-long membership until you click on the join page. -Login and member pages are non-secure. So could be hacked. And your ISP keeps a record of each page you visit. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Vendo is the billing agent. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many memberships with Vendo to different sites over the years, and never had a problem. -The search function is poor. The search at Beauty Angels only returns content from the Beauty Angels site. If you do a search for a specific model, only her content at the Beauty Angels site is returned, and nothing from other sites in the Teen Mega World network. However, on the last update to the network, they messed up the search at the Teen Mega World site. If you joined through the Teen Mega World network itself, and do a search for a model by name, you are returned a jumbled mess of names that is useless. If you want to search for a model's content at the network, you need to join through the Teen Mega World site itself, and not through one of the satellite sites. And then, you need to bring up the model listing, click on the model's name in the listing (not from the search box), and then you can find the model's content at the network. -Models are white Eastern European teens. If you want other races or ethnicities, or age groups, you won't find it here. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Site theme: The models are girls from 18 through early 20s. The girls are either showing off their fresh young bodies, or masturbating. There is also girl/girl lesbian sex. Boys are a rarity, mainly appearing in the early years of the site. For many years now, it's only solo girl or girl/girl sex. The site has 495 videos, plus matching photosets. The main strength of the site (and network) are the attractive teen models. Personally, I think the yearly price of $89.95 is a bargain, but if you search, you can sometimes find a yearly membership even cheaper. You get 33 teen sites with a membership to any one of the Teen Mega World sites. That covers a wide variety of niches. Many of the sites have not updated in years. But Beauty Angels updates with a new video and photoset each week. They advertise daily updates for the network. But if you check the update dates, there are 6 new videos and photosets each week. That is still a large amount of porn each week, with a huge amount of hardcore teen content from the network. A second strength of the site (and network) is the simplicity of the videos. There's very little acting, which is a good thing, because most porn models are lousy actresses. You have a girl, she strips, then masturbates. Or you have two girls, who kiss, fondle each other, and start solo masturbation or masturbating each other, or have lesbian sex. Very little dialogue (which is in Russian, probably, and you don't need subtitles because who cares what they are saying, it's the sex and naked bodies that matter). And if you really care about the dialogue, they sometimes have subtitles in English. All in all: mainly attractive teens, with some real beauties, and they put on a show worth watching. I'm giving the site a score of 92, because the site is good, and it comes with network access. 04-15-20  04:34am Replies (0) Review 203 Relaxxxed (0) 72.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Lets Doe It network, a mainly European glamcore network. The White Boxxx channel is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet, because of the care and techniques they use to make the attractive models as lovely as possible. -You get access to all the channels (15 channels total) with a membership in any one of the channels, or with a membership to the Lets Doe It network. There are no premium channels you have to pay extra for. -Unlimited streaming. -Relaxxxed channel has 130 videos. So it's one of the larger channels in the network. -Content is exclusive. Cons: -Archive channel. Last update was 2018-07-10. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -The first page you see when you login is a page of ads. This is a con and also a pro. Con, because who wants to see more ads, you paid for your membership, give me what I paid for, don't shove ads at me. Pro, because some of the ads have very low prices for some fine sites (as well as sites I have no interest in). So if I had lots of money (which I don't), the ads would be useful hints of what to join next. But I'm willing to browse the ads to see what's interesting--sort of like window shopping, where you browse the contents, even if you don't have much money to buy anything. -There is a download limit of 100 videos per month for the entire network. Not a problem for me for 2 reasons: 1. I have a year-long membership. 2. I rarely download a lot. If I have an active membership, it's just easier for me to view/stream the content online. Instead of searching through my computer. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -There is no limit on downloading photosets. But the photosets are tiny, only 10 or less photos per set, so they are not worth collecting, even when the girl is attractive, because the photos, although nice, are not extra-ordinary. I've seen a lot of photos that by themselves are so gorgeous (the girl model is photographed so well) that it's worth keeping those photos, but none of the photos I've seen at the Relaxxxed channel are that special or worth keeping. -In addition to the first page of ads that you have to click through to get to the member pages, there are ads at the bottom of each member page. But they are easy to ignore. -There is a zip file for each photoset. But it downloads in only one definition (you can't choose low, medium or high). But since the photosets are not worth keeping, that's no problem. -The photosets download with a generic file name of mixed alpha-numeric characters. So if you want to know what the file is, you have to rename it with model, title of set, etc. But again, not a problem, since the photosets are not worth downloading. -A minor irritation. To list all the channels at the Lets Doe It network, you have to click the "Load More Channels" link to add additional channels. Which is irritating, because to get to some channels, such as Relaxxxed, you have to go through the "Load More Channels" routine every time you are logged out. And my laptop logs me out of the network a lot. -I don't know if it's a server problem or my poor ISP connection, but I keep logging out of the site frequently, and have to re login. Not a major issue, but it's irritating. Again, don't know if the problem is with the site, or with my weak wifi connection that's causing the problem. -This is off topic. I use a laptop with the WiFi signal from Spectrum. The WiFi signal is weak. The WiFi speed averages about 15-20 Mbps on a 200 Mbps connection. I was charged about $90 this month, and about $48 the previous month, for going over my cellular data limit. I normally pay $35/month for my cell phone. I talked to Spectrum tech support, and the agent told me my cell phone was probably using cellular data instead of my WiFi, because I have a weak WiFi signal. This switching from WiFi to cellular data was done automatically by the phone, probably becasue the WiFi signal was weak. I went into the Spectrum office on Saturday, April 11, and the Spectrum agent changed the phone setup to use no cellular data. But just as a special warning, which might never apply to anyone: you have to check your bills. I am on automatic payments for my internet and cell phone usage. So I didn't realize what was happening until I checked my last bill, and saw I was charged $90 for cell phone data usage. That was a mistake. My cell phone data usage should be minimal: closer to zero than 1 GB, which is my monthly allowance. But computers and cell phones can be tricky, and you can run up charges you aren't aware of, until you get the bill. I shouldn't have been charged more than my $35 monthly payment, but because the cell phone was switching to cellular data from WiFi automatically, the bill was $90. So, check your bills. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Site stats: Number of videos: 130. Archive site. Last update 2018-07-10. Video runtime: 20 - 30 minutes. You can stream or download videos in different definitions: 240p through 1080p. Photosets: 10 or less photos in a set. Only one definition, but not worth downloading. Download limit: 100 videos for the network per month. The channel Relaxxxed theme is girls who are relaxing (laying at a pool, getting a message, doing yoga). An attractive guy shows up and the girl becomes aroused, and they have sex. There are so many porn sites, and they are always looking for some new idea to make things interesting. But the idea for this channel is lame and poorly executed. There are many fine or good massage sites, and this could be one, instead of the short, senseless pre-buildup of a girl laying at a pool, or doing yoga. The massage theme can be done very easily: it doesn't require much acting on the part of the female model, so that's one of the reasons a massage video is easy to do well. The attractive level of the models at Relaxxxed is below average for the network. The girls at The White Boxxx are attractive to begin with, and they are presented as gorgeous glamcore models. The models are Relaxxxed are OK, but when you compare with The White Boxxx, are a real disappointment. Sorry to keep harping on this, but The White Boxxx is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet. The models are presented in glorious, living color. The relaxxxed channel does have some massage videos. They are nothing special. I much prefer the massage videos at Tricky Masseur or the Dane Jones massage videos because they are simpler, focus on arousing the girl through a massage and then fucking. CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW: 04-14-20  04:46am Replies (1) Review 204 Step Siblings Caught (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to the entire network on joining. -Seventeen series included with your Nubiles Porn membership -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -Login and member pages are https secure. -PU has a discounted price of $14.98/month recurring. -Photosets are nice-sized, average about 120-138 photos per set. -PU and TBP have an error in the yearly membership. A yearly membership is $99.95/recurring. PU and TBP show a yearly membership is $199.00/recurring. PU and TBP show a yearly membership is $99.95/non-recurring. -Billers are CCBill and Epoch, both trusted names, easy to deal with, easy to cancel. -Videos can be streamed or downloade in 270p through 1080p. -Photosets are nice-sized, average about 120-138 photos per set. Cons: -The photosets are basically a wasted opportunity of attractive models. Little effort is put into making the models as attractive as possible. The lighting is good, the sets(background) are good, but they are not trying to make an erotic photo record of a sex shoot. The models are not posed in sexy positions, it's just a record of a sex scene, without trying for an erotic atmosphere. The models are attractive, but the photosets don't really take advantage of the models' physical looks. And the site has a lot of top grade models: Jillian Janson, Mia Malkova, Megan Rain, Maddy Rose, Piper Perri, and those are just the 5 models in the earliest posted videos. -Slow, irregular update rate: 1 to 4 videos per month. Site started in 2015, that's over 4 years ago, and it only has 123 videos Bottom Line: Site stats: Number of videos: 123 Video runtime: 30 minutes or less. Photosets: average 118-136 photos per set. The site is classified as reality porn. Which means that the porn is supposed to be a slice of life. Except that's a stretch: because the site porn is fantasy, featuring fake incest where step children have sex with each other or sometimes with their step parents. And the acting of the models makes it seem even more fake and not realistic. But that's one of the problems of much of mainstream porn: the models are not chosen for their acting ability, but for their willingness to strip for the camera and to be filmed in sexual situations. If you've watched a lot of porn behind-the-scene videos, you realize that porn is a business, and the models are paid performers putting on a show. Which takes away a lot of the heat and passion these scenes can sometimes generate. However, watching porn can be a learning experience. Especially with a site like Step Siblings Caught, which can give helpful hints on how to be a successful person. There's a video titled "Quarantined With My Step Sis" with Avery Cristy. She's a cute blonde model who's quarantined with her step-brother in an apartment. She wears a mask for health reasons because of the coronavirus epidemic, and she is cleaning their apartment. Then Avery and her step-brother sit on the couch, because they are bored and restless, and they start to make out. I guess that being quarantined because of the virus has made them not just bored but also horny. They move to the bedroom and the bed, and start going all out. Watching this video, I learned there can be good things to relieve your boredom if you have a step-sister stuck in the same apartment you are in. You can increase the family closeness, and have a good time doing it. Sex is the glue that keeps us together. And if you can't go out because of the quarantine rules, sex is the best way to not only relieve the boredom, but it also helps to make a family healthy and close. Bottom line: The pros for the site include: -A lot of pretty models. -Site membership is part of the Nubiles-porn network, which includes 17 sites you get access to. -The navigation is simple and easy. The cons include: -The plots for the site are stupid. Which takes away from the value of the videos. -The models, although attractive to very attractive, are not good actors: that, combined with the silly plots, detract from the impact of the videos. So even though some of the girls are very pretty, the stupid plots and poor acting can make for boring videos, and the site suffers. It's much better to watch an excellent photo site with great photography than to watch stupid videos of beautiful women. I'm giving the site a score of 79, in spite of the fact that you get access to nubiles.net, which is a great site filled with photosets and videos of cute to lovely women. Nubiles.net by itself deserves a score in the high 90s. But Step Siblings Caught, in spite of the pretty models, because it's a small site, and because the plots are silly, and the models can't act, and the videos are boring and unbelievable, is a poor site. 04-12-20  06:45pm Replies (0) Review 205 21 Naturals (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Adult Time network. So you get access to a huge catalog of over 50,000 hardcore videos, photosets, and other goodies. -21 Naturals has 975 videos, so it's a large channel (the sites at Adult Time are called channels instead of sites). -Login and member pages are https. So your data is secure, and less prone to hacking, and the ISP record is less invasive (a record is kept of your accessing the network, but not the individual pages you view). -The models are mainly late teens or early twenties, attractive to very attractive. Mainly white, but a few black. -The models are enthusiatic and put on a good show. This is boy-girl (or man-woman, if you want to be politically correct) sex. The action is basic sex: a combination of the guy eating the girl, the girl sucking the guy's cock, vaginal and anal sex. Not over-the-top gonzo hardcore, but -There is a zip file for a standard and a high-res photoset. -The photosets average around 90 photos. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -The photos are good quality pics. Not as good as MetArt or MPL Studios photos, but good quality for hardcore action sex. The standard resolution is 1920x1280 pixels. The high-res photo resolution is 5760x3840 pixels. -Download speeds are good. I get 2-2.5 MB/sec off my WiFi network, which is about my maximum download speed for my WiFi connection. My hardwired Internet speed is supposed to be 200 Mbps, but the WiFi connection is always much slower than a hardwired connection. -The technical support is first rate, one of the finest I've ever had. There is a live-chat option that is 24/7, and a human person answers almost immediately, within a few minutes. Compare that with my experience trying to talk to a tech support member at Spectrum, my internet provider. I can easily wait 30 to 40 minutes before a human operator comes on the line. Bottom Line: PROS(CONTINUED): -There is a trailer and the full scene. So the trailer gives you a good idea of what the scene will be, and shows you what the model looks like. -Videos have a short text description that summarizes the action. -The channel is updating. It used to be a new video every few days, but since the coronavirus epidemic, the upate rate has slowed to once a week. Which is still fine, because the coronavirus has hit the porn industry really hard, along with entire United States. CONS(START OF): -I think the cons are mainly minor. First this is a good channel. Second, and more importantly, it gives you access to the Adult Time network, which is one of the best bargains for hardcore porn on the Internet. -The zip file for a photoset downloads with a generic numeric filename, so you have to re-name the file to know who the model is, and what the set is. Unless you keep a detailed record listing the numeric filename and all the details of the file, such as model's name, set title, channel, date posted, etc. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -Although the navigation is mainly easy, because you have so much content at both the channel and the network, it takes a while before you can easily find the content that fits your taste. If you had less content to look through, it would be easier to find your best material. It's like too much of a good thing takes away from the experience. But that's human nature. -The canned background music is distracting and reduces the value of the video. Get rid of it. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Channel stats: Videos: 975 Video runtimes average: 20 to 30 minutes. Average number of photos in a photoset: around 90 The standard resolution photos: 1920x1280 pixels. The high-res photo resolution: 5760x3840 pixels. Videos download with your choice of 160p through 1080p definition. You can also stream videos in your choice of 160p through 1080p definition. Unlimited streaming. Unlimited downloading. There are some memberships with reduced pricing where it's streaming only, but I think it's worth paying for a membership with downloading. Site theme: A guy and and a girl decide to fuck. It's that simple. Pros are that the girls are mainly attractive and enthusiastic for sex. I think that the models at Wow Girls, Wow Porn and X-Art are, in general, incredibly lovely and are more attractive than the models at 21 Naturals. However, any PU member who was lucky enough to get one of these 21 Naturals girls in his bed would be foolish to kick them out. A few plot summaries to give you an idea of the type of porn the channel has: Longing for Each Other 21 Naturals 2020-03-13 Featuring Nata Ocean Description Sexy Nata Ocean feels horny and wants a cock to please her wet pussy. Renato offered his hard dick in exchange for some feet caresses. So the descriptions are useful for giving a bare bones summary of the plot (the plot is basic: a guy and a girl decide to fuck). "Nextdoor Brat", 21 Naturals, posted 2020-04-03, featuring Julia Red: Description Sexy young babe Julia Red is going to her hot neighbor's house with the intent of getting her sweet booty deeply pounded by Thomas. To get his cock ready to slip in her ass she sucks on it until it is well lubricated with her saliva. Thomas then pounds her tushy making Julia moan of intense pleasure. He then finishes by busting all of his love juice straight in her mouth. So the description is not a love story, but an accurate telling of what the action is. ANAL DEBUT on 21!!!, 21 Naturals, posted 2017-06-03,featuring Zazie Skymm Description On a rainy afternoon blonde sweetheart Zazie Skymm is ready to give her anus for the first time ever to her hung boyfriend Nikki Nuttz. As the rain hits the windows the all natural blondie gets her tight butthole fingered and her pussy eaten at the same time. Feeling her rectum itching for a penis the daring blonde sucks and lubricates the stud's dick. The sodomy session starts slowly as Zazie gets used to the feeling of an erect cock in her anus for the first time, but things get intense fast and she is seen riding the cock with her ass like there is no tomorrow. In the end the lovely nymph will have her anus gaped and her face covered for cum with a definitive desire to do it again soon... Zazie Skymm is one of the most beautiful models at the channel. Lovely face, great body, she is just lovely and passionate. I wish she did this video at X-Art or one of the Wow sites, becasue the sky seems overcast, or maybe it's the filter they used, and she deserves better lighting to highlight how attracive she is. Bottom line: I'm giving the channel a score of 88. Not only does the channel have 975 videos, but you also get access to the Adult Time channel, which is one of the best bargains in porn today, due to the massive catalog of hardcore videos and the wide range of niches covered, plus a boatload of attractive female models. CONTINUED IN FIRST REPLY: 04-12-20  12:33pm Replies (1) Review 206 Young Libertines (0) 71.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the 18videoz network. -You get access to about 18 different sites with a membership. -Epoch is the default biller, a trusted name. Easy to cancel. -The site has a number of attractive teen models. -The content is exclusive. -Newer videos offer the choice of definition for low, medium, high, and 4K videos. That is for downloading. -Newer videos offer streaming in 240p, 720p. 1080p. Cons: -If you join the site directly (Young Libertines), you pay a much higher price than if you join through the 18videoz site: the 18videoz site gives you access to Young Libertines, as well as other teen sites). -PU has a discounted price of $14.95 for the first month for 18videoz. The price for Young Libertines is much higher. -PU also has a discounted price of $59.95/year for 18videoz. The price for Young Libertines is much higher. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -The public page shows cute models in the thumbnails, but the page looks like it was designed years ago. -Username and password are computer generated. A random mix of letters and numbers you have to write down. -The login and member pages are non-secure. Not https. So prone to hacking. -Some of the thumbnails, instead of loading a video you want to watch, are ads that load a new site that you can join. Annoying that the ads aren't clearly marked as ads. -Slow update rate. One video/month recently. Was 2 videos before. Bottom Line: The stats are for the 18videoz network. When you log in to the site, the stats shown are for the network, instead of for the site by itself, although you don't realize that until you check further on what the network stats are. Trying to check what the stats are for the site, by itself, would take a lot of time and effort. Which is different from what many other porn sites do: many porn sites show clearly what the number of videos, models, photosets are for the individual sites. Network stats: videos: 3202 models: 2243 photos: 210518 photosets: 2441 The Young Libertines site was launched in 2008. It started out as a low-rent collection of teen hardcore vidoes. Although they used attractive teen models, the videos were cheaply made: No effort was made into making the models look pretty. The technical factors were poor: poor lighting, poor sound control, cheap sets (mainly rooms that look like they are run-down public housing). The current public preview page is old and should be updated. The main con is that the site started out years ago as a low-rent collection of teen hardcore videos. And it's still seems like a low-rent collection of teen hardcore videos. Although the site might have been a worthwhile join back in 2008, when it was first starting out, the site is poor choice for your money in today's world, where the porn offerings on the internet are far superior to what you will find at this site. To make it simple: It the content worth viewing? No, it's not. The models are attractive, but many of the videos are poor in quality because of the cheap sets, poor lighting, poor costumes, cheap video equipment. They really need to update the site, to make the overall site more attractive, to clearly separate the newer videos from the older, lower-quality content. Otherwise, you get the impression that the entire site is a jumbled mess of low-quality porn. The price is cheap, if you join through the 18videoz site, instead of through the more expensive Young Libertines site. But even with a cheap price, the contents at the Young Libertines site are a waste of time and money. Unless you can find some videos at the other sites in the network that are worthwhile, you will regret joining the Young Libertines site. Although site navigation and other factors are important in scoring a site, if the content is not worth viewing, who cares if the site navigation is easy? The site navigation is easy, but you are looking at low-grade videos that are a waste of time. Although they have upgraded the videos over the last few years, the videos still seem like cheaply made videos. They are more like home-made videos instead of the excellent videos you can find at X-Art, or the Wow porn sites, or the better quality videos at Teen Mega World. I honestly don't know why the videos seem like home-made, amateur videos. Unless that is the vibe they are going for. The videos at the other sites I mentioned are so much better in quality and visual appeal. Edit: I am slow. They are going for the home-made, amateur video vibe. And that's why I don't appreciate the site. I much prefer the X-Art, Wow Girls and Wow Porn style of professional quality videos. Giving the site a score of 71. 04-02-20  09:25pm Replies (0) Review 207 Bums Bus (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the LetsDoeIt network, one of the premium glamcore networks on the internet. -There is unlimited streaming of videos. -Unlimited downloading of photosets. -But there is a network download limit of 100 videos/month. This video limit is clearly shown. -The content is exclusive. -PU has a discounted price of $24.95/month recurring. However, since Bums Bus is part of the LetsDoeIt network, it might be cheaper to buy a membership directly through LetsDoeIt, to access the Bums Bus channel. LetsDoeIt special discounts are often found, while Bums Bus specials are less frequient. Cons: -2 Pre-checked cross-sales on join page. -The dialogue is in German. Some of the videos have subtitles. But whether the video has subtitles or not doesn't matter: I don't care what they are saying. You read a few subtitles, you get they are making jokes and having a good time before and during and after the sex, and it's all pointless: unless you've really drunk, and think these jerks are really cool studs. Otherwise, it's just a waste of time and video, and let's switch to a better channel. -Appears to be an archive site. The last update was 2018-12-13. -There is often a lot of filler material on a video before you get to the nudity or sex. Bottom Line: Site theme: German girls are given a ride in a bus and have hardcore sex. The bus is actually a van. The site has 134 videos. -Although the channel is part of the LetsDoeIt network, this channel is not glamcore. The vibe they are going for is trash porn, with a dose of humor. It's like an updated version of the Beatles "A Hard Days Night", with the frenetic camera work and a low-trash hardcore porn twist for the intro section of the video. The description for the last updated video (posted 2018-12-13) is as follows: European girl has sex for money "Jason Steel convinced the beautiful Kim Davis, a student, to have sex in front of the camera for money. This European girl didn't hesitate to say "yes." The two of them get into intense action on the back of the van. See how this German beauty sucks and takes dick in pussy for cash!" Jason Steel is the main stunt cock for this video. Kim Davis is described as beautiful. She is nice-looking, but I wouldn't call her beautiful. Except this is porn, and they exaggerate everything anyway. The video runtime is 42.03. You don't get to the sex or any nudity until the 20 minute mark, where you start to see her topless. From there, you eventually get to the sex. Except by then: I'm thinking why have I wasted so much time on this video? Or this channel? When the other channels are so much better to watch. The models at the other channels are better looking. And you get to the sex so much faster. And the sex at most of other channels is easier to watch. Or you can switch to a different network, where the girls are attractive, and the sex is good. I'm giving this channel two thumbs down. I've seen worse sites, and the technical factors of the video are good, except I've used up my patience waiting for something good to happen. I'm giving the channel a score of 70. And that's only because if you joined this site, you also gained access to the rest of the LetsDoeIt network, which has some very good sites. Side note: I selected that I've been a member of the site/channel for over 12 months. That's because I've been a member of LetsDoeIt for over 12 months, which gives me access to this site. If Bums Bus was a stand-alone site, I would give it a score of 50. 03-19-20  02:04am Replies (0) Review 208 Petite Ballerinas Fucked (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -The site is part of the nubiles-porn network, so you get access to the entire nubiles-porn network. -PU has a discounted price of $14.98/month recurring. -I really enjoy the on-screen photo viewer. It's easy to use, and you can control the speed the images remain. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -Exclusive content. -The site watermark is small and located at the bottom right corner of each photo, so it's out of the way. -The models are young, attractive, slender teens, and the stunt cocks look like they could be real ballet dancers, adding to the fantasy. There isn't much of a plot or build-up: the female model is dressed as a ballerina, doing a few moves by a barre (the stationary handrail that ballet dancers use). The male dancer shows up, they might kiss or hold or touch each other, then they have sex. But the set is clean, the costumes simple dance outfits, the colors are strong and real, the technical features (focus, lighting, sound, etc) is very good. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Photosets average over 100 photos per set. These are good quality photos. Much better than screencaps. And since the models are attractive, the photosets are worth keeping. The photosets come in multiple definitios for download in a zip file: 1200x800px, 2000x1334px, 7952x5304px. The videos come in multiple definitions for streaming and download: 270p up to 1080p. CONS(START OF): -Small site. Only 39 episodes. -Archive site. Or you could say it's a site with a very erratic, slow, update rate. -This is not a con against the site, but both the PU site and The Best Porn site say the one year membership is free. That seems to be a mistake. On The Best Porn site there is the notice: "Simply enter the site (this link or any on this page) and look for the lower price on the credit card billing page." Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): I click on the link at The Best Porn, hit the join link at Petite Ballerinas Fucked, and see a price of $99.95/year, recurring. That is a sale price, but it's not free. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The site (also called a series by nubiles-porn) was started in 2015-09-02. The site only has 39 episodes, so it's a tiny site. The update rate is very erratic: sometimes there is one video added in a month, then months go by with no new videos. The last video was added 2019-09-08, so you could consider this an archive site, or a site with an amazingly slow update rate. That is a shame, because the quality of the videos is excellent: The models are petite (tiny) girls who are dressed in ballerina costumes. A stunt cock comes along, in theory the girl's dancing partner, and they have sex. The visuals are outstanding: clear, crisp visuals for the video. The girls are white, slender, young. Not too much make-up, but they are just luscious. Maybe not the right word: striking and adorable and eminently fuckable is a better way to describe the models. (Pardon the French, LOL). The sex is not harsh: it's more like a girl and a guy with strong sexual drives getting off together: not love, just sex. What makes it memorable is the girl is slender, white, young, attractive, and she's dressed in a ballerina costume. Doing some dance exercises. Then the male dancer appears (he looks like he could be a real dancer). So there's a small element of realism to the video. And the couple is clean. And attractive. And the sex is good. Not great. There's no harshness or violence or cruelty to the sex: It's an interesting site. A niche site, because the theme is slender white ballerinas who are having sex with their dance partner. But since the site is so small (only 39 episodes), you'll be able to download the entire site, or what you want to keep, very easily. And in a short time. And since there are little to no updates, you will then move on to the rest of the network, which thankfully has enough material to keep you occupied for a good while. There are 17 sites (or series) in the network. Covering different niches. Scoring the site is not easy: Because the site is so small (39 episodes, remember), and there are few if any updates, those are large negatives. However, the videos and photosets are first rate, technically. And the girls are slender white teens who are very attractive. I say teens, they look like teens, but some could be in their early twenties. So if that's the kind of model you like, the score goes up. And with network access, the score goes up even more. The nubiles-porn network is an excellent network. So I'm giving the site a score of 88. That is very subjective. 03-18-20  10:37pm Replies (0) Review 209 First BGG (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -They are working constantly to update and improve the site and network. -They did a recent update for the network public page, making the page brighter and more inviting. The network public page shows nice-sized thumbnails for latest videos, featured videos, newest girls, -As part of the Teen Mega World network, you get access to 33 teen porn sites. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for. -The network updates around 5 days a week, with exclusive content. -The site (and some of the network) has 4K videos, as well as lower definition videos. -The site (and some of the network) has high resolution images. -Navigation is easy. It's easy to switch between sites in the network. -PU has a discounted price of $14.95/month recurring. -Unlimited downloads. -Unlimited streaming. -Although this is not a glamour site or network, the girls are basically white teens who are attractive. Cons: -If you join through the main TMW site, the search returns content from the entire network. However, if you join through one of the other sites in the network, the search returns only content from the site you joined through. So do yourself a favor, and join through the main TMW site. -I think they did a recent update on the search engine and messed it up. Assume you log in through the TMW site, and not the First BGG site. You enter the name "Lolly Small" in the search. What you are returned is a huge number of hits, most of which have nothing to do with Lolly Small. The search for "Lolly Small" returns 301 results. And Lolly Small only has 10 videos at the network. I've been a continuous member of the network for over 3 years now, and the search at the TMW site used to be good, returning only results that matched the model's name. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Login and member pages are non-secure. Not https. So easy to hack. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Although the network has a daily update, the update rate for the site is approximately 1 per month. 2018-11-27 the site had 110 videos. 2020-03-17 the site has 121 videos. So over time, the update rate is less than 1 per month. The reason for the slow update rate for the site is that updates are spread over the network, so the BGG site gets less than 1 new video plus matching photo set per month. Which is more than acceptable, since there is a huge amount of teen content in the network to look through. -Vendo is the billing agent. Not as familiar as CCBill or Epoch. But I've used Vendo many times, and never had a problem. So I'm listing it as a minor con, but it's not really a con. I've used Vendo for WowGirls, DDF Network, Ultra Films, Lust Week, etc. -Many of the sites are archive sites, that haven't updated in years. The quality of the archive sites is definitely less than the current output of videos and photosets. Some of the archive sites do not have streaming; you have to download the video or photo set to see it. -The photosets have a zip file, but it's only in 1 definition, not low, medium and high. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Site theme: One guy on two girls. Forget love, these girls are interested in sex. And they are willing to share a guy. Site stats: videos: 121 photo sets: 121 As you might be able to tell, TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks. This review is on First BGG, but I believe the details on the TMW network, of which First BGG is part of, can be helpful. What I like about the site and network: The models are mainly attractive young teens, who put on a good show: they seem to enjoy the sex. The models are real teens. Not a lot of fake boobs. Not a lot of tattoos. This is not a glam site or network. The network started around 2005. The site (First BGG) started around 2011. The network started out as a low-rent teen hardcore collection of sites. Over time, they have spent a lot of time, effort and money into upgrading the network and included sites. For the last few years, you can stream or download the most recent videos in 360p up to 2160p. The upgrades included: With a membership in any site in the network, you now get access to all the sites (currently 33 sites.) Better equipment for filming and photographing, better, more expensive sets, better costumes (the costumes are street clothes, but better street clothes than what they used to wear), better lighting, sound control. The videos and photo sets from the last few years are excellent quality: not glamcore, but still excellent quality. The quality obviously gets worse as you look at the older material. First BGG is part of the TMW network. TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore network. I wouldn't say that First BGG is one of the top sites in the network, but it is a worthwhile addition to the network. I'm giving the site a score of 90. That is basically because joining any site in the network gives you access to the entire network. If I had to score the First BGG by itself, without network access, the score would be much lower. But it's still a good site, with 121 videos and matching photosets. 03-17-20  10:12am Replies (2) Review 210 LetsDoeIt (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -An outstanding glamcore network. Many of the models range from attractive to freaking lovely. -The White Boxxx channel, part of the network, is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet. Not only are the models lovely, but the sets and makeup and costumes and filming techniques combine to make the models as lovely and glamourous as possible. Most models that appear at this channel are at their loveliest, and look better by far than at most other porn site appearances. -The network has 17 channels. Some are archive channels that no longer update. But the best ones do update, especially The White Boxxx. -Contents are exclusive. -The network has all the trimmings of a high quality glamcore network: -The videos can be streamed and downloaded in low, medium and high quality. -Each video has a intro section, which can be skipped when streaming. -The videos can be streamed in regular or slow motion. -The videos and photo sets have multiple choices of definition. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -The search covers the entire network, instead of a single channel. -You can vote to like, dislike or choose as favorite. -Can also comment on each video or photo set. CONS(START OF): -I think the cons are basically minor. Especially when I consider the value of The White Boxxx channel. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -The photo sets are tiny. Average 10 photos per set. Some of the models are gorgeous, and deserve a full gallery to feature their beauty. -The search could be better. If you enter a model's name, such as Lena Reif, it returns all instances of any model with the name of Lena, instead of just instances of Lena Reif. -This is a nit-pick. The White Boxxx videos focus on such high quality glamcore that the videos lose a little steam. They are great in visual quality and eroticism, but lack the impact of the Porn Fidelity, Teen Fidelity videos, which are high quality gonzo porn (I don't know if gonzo porn is the right term, because the Porn Fidelity/Teen Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): Fidelityporn can be raw and powerful). -Some of the channels are archive, that haven't updated in years. -A nit-pick. Although you can vote to like or dislike a video or photo set, all I've seen are likes. Not a single dislike of a video or photo set. Which seems unlikely. -A nit-pick. Bottom of member page has a few small ads. Easily ignored. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): -Maybe I'm biased, but a few scenes from The White Boxxx channel are worth at least one month's membership price. The first video I watched at the network was "Sensual threesome sex with a lucky guy". This is at The White Boxxx, with Lena Reif, Shona River and Lutro (Lutro is the stunt cock). Posted 2018-11-30. For high quality glamcore sex, it doesn't get any better. Watching Lena Reif's breasts swaying in lovely motion is truly poetry in motion. Lena Reif, attractive face, lovely body, a wet dream come true. And Shona River is a luscious babe, as well. Except compared to Lena Reif, nobody compares to Lena Reif, great face, fantastic body, Lena Reif can put on a show that is priceless. Network stats: Number of channels: 17 Number of videos: 1,481 Number of photo sets: 1,468 Number of photos per photo set: 10 Bottom line update: I am blown away by The White Boxxx channel of this network. I think it's the finest example of high quality glamcore porn on the internet. The models are georgeous, they are shown in expensive sets that highlight their beauty. The emphasis in on eroticism rather than sex, although the sex is hardcore. There are defintely other channels in the network worth checking out. And plenty of lovely or attractive models throughout the network. But the crown jewel of the network is The White Boxxx channel. I've giving the network a score of 95. Join for a month, to sample their wares. To see if a longer membership is to your taste. I've joined the network for over 1 year now. 03-17-20  03:28am Replies (0) Review 211 Nubiles Porn (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month recurring. -One of the best hardcore teen networks around. There are many fine teen hardcore networks, and this is one them. -I consider Nubiles.net the star of the network: Nubiles.net is like an encyclopedia of teen porn stars, and usually gets them around when they are starting out in porn. -You get access to 17 sites in the network, covering a wide variety of niches. -The models are basically young teens and are pretty to fucking attractive. -You also get some milfs. So there is variety in the age selection. But the models are basically white. Not much other races such as Asian or Black. -CCBill is the default biller. Epoch is also available. Two of the best billers around, for easy cancellation and service. -Although I don't usually like ads, some of the ads for porn sites are the lowest prices I've seen. Example: $79.95/year for LetsDoeIt, a fine network for glam porn. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Online slideshow of photos has control of how long each photo is shown. -Most videos have a matching photo set. -There are no download limits that I have seen. -You don't have to pay extra for downloads. A lot of other sites are starting to charge extra for download privileges. -You can stream or download in low, medium or high definition. That applies to both video and photo set. CONS(START OF): -Cons are basically minor. This is one of the better networks for hardcore teen porn. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Some PU members have complained that Nubiles.net is not included with Nubiles-porn. That is wrong. You just have to find the drop-down menu at the site to see Nubiles.net site is included. -Although navigation is simple, you have to find the tiny download icon to see what sites are available. Bottom Line: Nubiles-porn stats Videos: 1329 Videos are available in definition: 480p - 1080p. Photo sets: 1268 Number of photos per photo set: approximately 40 to 100+ Size of photos: Large 5760x3840px Medium 2000x1333px Small 1200x800px Number of models: ? I don't know how to estimate the number of models from the different sites. Especially when you include the Nubiles-net site. One of the benefits of joining a hardcore porn network is that it teaches you about life. Saving water is important. Especially in California. So if you have an attractive step-sister or step-mother, it's OK to share a shower. Not only are you saving water, but it can be a lot of fun. Watching the videos at MomsTeachSex.com, you soon realize that step-moms have a wisdom that comes from experience, and they can teach both their step-sons and step-daughters valuable lessons in sex and life attitudes. For example, the "Moms Valentines Day Fun" with Anya Olsen and Krissy Lynn: the step-son, Oliver Flynn, is kind of a moron. When his step-sister wants to suck his dick, he objects, because she is his sister. But the step-mother, the kind, caring and attractive Anya Olsen, tells Oliver that families should care for each other. And soon Oliver, Anya and Krissy are in a 3-three, for the Valentine holiday. This is one sweet message that MomsTeachSex can tell us. Sex is good. Sex is caring. Sex is healthy. There are currently 17 sites you get access to with a sub to Nubiles-porn. BadTeensPunished.com BountyHunterPorn.com DaddysLilAngel.com DetentionGirls.com DriverXXX.com MomsTeachSex.com MyFamilyPies.com Nubiles-Casting.com Nubiles.net NubilesET.com Nubiles-porn.com NubilesUnscripted.com PetiteBallerinasFucked.com PetiteHDPorn.com PrincessCum.com StepSiblingsCaught.com TeacherFucksTeens.com Bottom line: Nubiles-porn is one of the better networks for hardcore teen porn. I am basing that on: -The models range from attractive to fucking attractive. -You have a large number of models. -The low membership price. During holiday specials, you can sometimes find a yearly membership for $90 or less. -The wide range of niches covered. -The network is easy to use. Easy navigation. -The technical quality of the videos and photo sets is very good to excellent. I'm giving the network a score of 95. 03-16-20  11:50pm Replies (0) Review 212 18 Flesh (0) 76.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -197 videos. Not huge, but still good sized for a hardcore teen site. -They updated the online video player in 2016. -Expired members get free limited access to the website. You can see all picture sets, some videos, and a preview of the latest updates. -Vendo is the default biller. Not the biggest name in payment processors, but I've used them many times, and never had a problem. -The models are late teens or early 20s. Not super attractive, but not ugly. -PU gives a discount of $14.95 for the first month. -PU also gives a discounted yearly membership of $59.95/recurring. -Membership in 18Flesh gives you access to over 9 main hardcore teen sites. -More recent videos are up to 4K definition for other sites in the network. -Althogh 18 Flesh is not updating, the network is updating, so there is fresh material to enjoy. -After you've logged in to the site/network a few times, the site will normally recognize you, so you don't need to re-enter your login details each time. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -You can vote on each video, up or down. Considering the last video was posted over 8 years ago, there are very few votes on most videos, and the number of downloads of most videos is often less than 1,000, which means very few people have bothered to collect these videos. CONS(START OF): -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -This is an archive site. The last update was on 2011-12-15. -Non-secure login. Meaning your login details are easily hacked. -Non-secure member pages. Meaning the pages you visit are recorded by your ISP and available to spy agencies and the police as needed. -The username and password are computer generated, so you need to write them down. -The video definition is low: you have a choice of 240p or 480p. Most PU members would require a far higher definition, if possible. Bottom Line: Site Videos 197 Site Models 2241 Site Photosets 2439 The Best Porn states the 18 Videoz network had 3,027 video on 2018-06-27. On 2020-03-12, the number of videos is 3198. 171 videos added in 20 months indicates a slow update rate to the network. The 18 Flesh site itself stopped updating on 2011-12-15. You get 2 additional bonus sites with a membership (the 1-day trial membership do not get access). The sites are Teens Analyzed and 18 Pussy Club. The also have a live sex cams channel, with over 2,300 models. Many of the models are men, so I assume that is for gay audiences. (Man, not interacting with a woman.) I'm not interested in cam shows, so I didn't investigate the cam shows, even though there are both "online", "party", and "gold" shows available. The cam shows can be viewed in English, French, Spanish, Italian, German, Swedish, Portuguese, Dutch, Norwegian. You can also select the chat show by geographic region: North America/UK/Australia Western Europe Central Eastern Europe Central/South America Asia Africa The live cams also have a calendar, where they list the time and date of special chat events: WildOnCam, Squirtamania, ErotiqueTV. The calendar only lists 3 or 4 days of upcoming days' events. Although I believe the videos at 18 Flesh are professionally shot, with good lighting, framing, color and sound control, and ok-looking models, the videos are just hardcore sex with little eroticism or flavor. I quickly found them boring. I enjoy the videos at Teen Mega World much better: I think the models are more attractive, and the girls put on a better show. And the videos at Wow Girls and Wow Porn are at a higher level, because of how fucking attractive the models can be: and the technical factors (lighting, color, sound, framing) are excellent. To recap, Teen Mega World offers a better experience than 18 Flesh. And the Wow Girls and Wow Porn offers an even better experience. Teen Mega World is more expensive than 18 Flesh and its network. But Teen Mega World is worth the extra price. Wow Girls and Wow Porn is more expensive than Teen Mega World. But they are worth the premium price. I'm giving 18 Flesh a score of 76. Because in addition to 18 Flesh, you get access to a number of other sites in the network. And if you are into cams, the cam shows might be interesting. Except I can't evaluate the cam shows, because I have no interest in them. What I do find interesting about the cam shows is that there is apparently a large number of shows for gay clients. If you don't require girls that are very attractive, that put on a good show of enjoying a sexual experience, if you only require a guy plugging a girl's mouth, pussy and ass, then you could score the site higher. I want to watch attractive girls, and I hope that they will put on a show that convinces me they are enjoying themselves, so I'm willing to pay more for an upgraded experience. 03-12-20  03:17pm Replies (0) Review 213 Rocco Siffredi (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -I am writing the review based on the Adult Time channel for Rocco Siffredi. But I am also including some details on the original Rocco Siffredi site, and other sites that have channels in the Adult Time network. -If you join Adult Time, the Rocco Siffredi channel is included, along with over 100 additional channels of porn covering a wide variety of niches. -If you join the Rocco Siffredi site directly, you also get access to the Adult Time network. If you join the Rocco Siffredi site directly, you also get direct access to over 20 porn sites, in addition to the Adult Time channels. (I was a member of Devils Film directly in 2019, which gave me access to a large number of porn sites directly. Almost all of the porn sites are now included as channels in the Adult Time network: however, when a porn site is included as a channed in the Adult Time network, there are often differences between the Adult Time channel and the original site it's based on: Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -the number of videos in the Adult Time channel are often far less than the the video count at the original site. -The photo sets at the Adult Time channel have fewer photos than the original photo sets at the original site. -The search engine at Adult Time returns the content for a model from the entire Adult Time network. The search engine, at the original site returns content for a model from the site network, which is both positive and negative: it limits the content returned to the site network, so it's easier to search for the model's content at the network, filtering out much of the Adult Time network. I don't believe you can limit the search in an Adult Time network to a single channel: Instead, a search in the Adult Time network returns all the model's content at Adult Time. -The Rocco Siffredi channel has 2142 videos, which is a huge number of videos. Rocco featured A-list female porn stars for many years. CONS(START OF): -Pre-checked cross-sale on join pag Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -When you join many of the sites in the Gamma Entertainment network, you also gain access to the Adult Time network. However, not all sites in the Gamma Entertainment network clearly specify whether you will get complete access to the Adult Time network. That is a major negative, because I believe that access to the Adult Time network is the crown jewel of most memberships to a Gamma Entertainment site. -As previously noted, the search engine for Adult Time returns content from the entire Adult Time network. You can't filter the search to include only the results from a single channel. -Also, the search engine at the Adult Time network is flawed, because it only shows a part of the model's content, instead of clearly showing her entire content listed over several pages. -The photo sets at Rocco Siffredi channel are limited edition versions of the original photo sets. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): -Rocco started in porn in the 1980s, and he is still performing in porn today. Rocco is called the Italian Stallion, because of his cult-like fame as one of the most recognizable male porn stars ever. -Some PU members have expressed disappointment with the Adult Time network: they feel it offers a degraded version of the porn sites that are cloned into channels of the Adult Time network. I feel that the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today, based on the following: -A huge backlog of high quality porn-high quality based on the technical factors of a porn video. -A wide variety of porn genres and niches. -Easy search for a model's content the Adult Time network. -A low membership price. Especially if you join during one of the holiday special price discounts. I'm giving the Rocco Siffredi channel a score of 93. That's because you get access not only to the Rocco Siffredi channel, but also get access to the excellent Adult Time network, which has over 100 channels covering a wide variety of niches, and a huge backlog of high quality hardcore porn videos and photo sets. Because of the huge amount of content at the Rocco Siffredi channel, and also the huge amount of content at the Adult Time network, searching through the channel and network can take a lot of time and effort to find what you're looking for. That is both good and bad. But there is so much quality hardcore porn, that the search is worth the effort, and the network is a definite bargain. 03-07-20  11:37pm Replies (2) Review 214 Ultra Films (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -The models range from pretty to lovely. Mainly slim bodies, white, late teens to early twenties. -The quality of the videos and photo sets is high class. Excellent lighting, focus, sound control. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -Choice of definition for downloading and streaming, from 480p through 4K. -You can steam or download the entire video, or select the parts you want to play or download. -Most videos have an accompanying photo set, which can be downloaded in 1000px, 2000px, and 4000px. -Navigation is basic but simple. You can search by Updates, Films, Galleries, Models. Cons: -I believe the cons are minor. This is one of the better sites for quality teen porn. The reasons are shown in the pro section above: the lovely teen models, the technical quality of the videos and photo sets. -Vendo is the billing agent. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem. -The customer support can be poor. They require you to use a ticketing system, and you don't always get a response to your requests. That is the Ultra Film support system, which is called onetouchservice. The Vendo support is much better. Bottom Line: If you like the Wow Girls and Wow Porn or All Fine Girls sites, you should like the Ultra Films site as well. They use the same models, the same style of porn, which could be called glamcore, in that the content is more or less spontaneous sex. The sex is either solo masturbation, girl-girl, boy-girl, or threesomes or more between girls, girls with a guy, girls with two guys. Not a lot of romance or plot, just some kissing or fondling before they get down to the blowjobs and vaginal and anal intercourse or fingering and licking etc. I believe the site was started around 2017-06, when Ultra 4K videos were becoming popular on porn sites. Which is why they called the site Ultra Films, because the site features videos with definitions up to 4K. (Teen Mega World also started a site in 2015 called Beauty 4K which featured videos up to 4K definition. But for years, all the new videos at all the sites at Teen Mega World go up to 4K definition, so it's not the newest fad any more.) Having said that 4K is no longer the newest fad, some PU members really seem to enjoy the 4K experience. I don't have the equipment to enjoy or appreciate the 4K experience. Maybe it's my age (I'm over 70), or my eyesight, or the lack of high end equipment, but I can't tell or appreciate the increased value of videos that are above 720p. And if I download content (video or photo sets), the lower definition content takes far less storage space than the higher definition content. If I download a 4000px, 2000px and 1000px photo set of the same photo set, and watch the photos in a slide show with Windows Photo Viewer (a photo viewer software that comes with Windows 10 on some editions), I can't tell the difference visually between the different definition photos. However, if I use IrfanView software (another photo viewer software that is free), and expand a single photo, I can tell the difference in the definition of a single photo. But that is not the way I view these photos. I usually use a slide show player to view them. Or, I can stop the slide show, to view a single photo, but I don't usually expand the photo the examine it in blow-up mode. So, for me, downloading high definition videos and photos is mainly a waste of storage space. And 4K videos use up a lot of storage space fast. That's me. There seem to be enough PU members that appreciate 4K content that it's a significant factor in their enjoyment of a porn site. And the same for Virtual Reality sites. There are PU members who enjoy and subscribe to Virtual Reality porn sites. I don't have virtual reality equipment. So virtual reality sites don't interest me very much. Although the sites can also be viewed without virtual reality equipment. But mainly virtual reality porn is best skipped over if you don't have virtual reality equipment. Bottom line: The Ultra Films site is a quality offering from the people who run the Wow Girls\Wow Porn sites. You have the same lovely teen models, the same type of porn: spontaneous sex between young teens, filmed in clear, crisp images with solid colors, and excellent technical factors. How can they improve the site: If you join any one of the three sites (Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls), you get immediate access to all 3 sites. Ultra Films is a separate site. If they added Ultra Films to the other 3 sites in a single membership, that would more content added for the same price. That would be great for the porn customer. But not so great for the porn producer, who is trying to increase revenues, by offering sites with different memberships. The newest offering from these people is LustWeek.com. Which uses the same models seen at the other sites (Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls, Ultra Films) I've mentioned, in the same high quality porn. The LustWeek site focuses on a new model each week. And these models can be fucking lovely. I'm giving the Ultra Films site a score of 93. It's definitely worth checking out, if you are a fan of All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn. However, joining all of these worthwhile sites can get to be very expensive. 02-25-20  09:31am Replies (2) Review 215 Mr. Skin (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -The main pro is that the site serves as an encyclopedia of nude appearance by movie stars in movies. An easy way to check if a movie star appeared nude or semi-nude in movies. More suitable for fans of movie stars, instead of fans of erotic content. -Unlimited downloading and streaming. -Secure login and member pages (https). -The introductory page after login is a page of ads. Normally, I don't consider ads a positive, but there are only a few ads for major sites, and some of the membership prices are very low: MetArt, for example, has a $60 annual membership listed, which is the lowest price I've seen for that site. -The clips usually end with a "SkinVision" segment, where they replay the "sexy part of the clip" in slow motion, so you can re-watch the "best part of the clip". -A low membership price: $60/year. They often offer a lifetime membership for $100. -Excellent search engine. Cons: -The tags describing a clip can be misleading: A tag says breasts, but the model/actress can be wearing a bikini or a blouse, and the breasts are not naked, but covered by material. You figure she has breasts, because she is female, but you can't see them. Or the tags say ass, and the model has an ass, but it's covered by a bikini bottom or shorts. -The clips are not erotic. They are too short to be erotic. Even when the clip is from the erotic part of a movie, you lose the impact of the movie because the build-up to the clip is missing, and the clip itself lacks the original meaning of the scene. And when I say the clip is too short to be erotic, you have a clip of two minutes or less, so it's like a fleeting glance, instead of a full-blown experience. An erotic photo or photo set can, and usually is, a more complete and satisfying experience instead of the Mr Skin short movie clips. -The quality of the clips is disappointing. The clips from movies are degraded definition. Bottom Line: The site is for fans who want to search for brief clips of movie stars nudity. The clips are not erotic. They are mainly short clips, 2 minutes or less, with minimal build-up. As an encyclopedia of movie star nudity, it serves a useful function. But I feel Mr Skin is built for fans of movie star nudity, and not for fans of erotic content. If you want erotic content, go for a fine photo site, like MPL Studios or MetArt or other softcore glam sites. Or if you're into hardcore teens, the Wow Girls/Wow Porn sites, X-Art, Teen Mega World offer a lot of value. Or a hardcore glamcore network like LetsDoeIt is a fine choice. Even though Mr Skin is catalogued as an erotic site, since it focuses on nudity in movies, it is not a site to go to for erotic content. Instead, you go to the site if you have an itch to see if a favorite movie star has done any public (movie, tv) nudity. There's a reply from PU member marcdc1 on 2019-04-25 that sums up the site: "I keep checking out Mr. Skin and so far haven't pulled the trigger - mostly because I fear it's going to feed my curiosity - but not my libido". I'm giving the site a score of 80. It's a good site for what it does: There's a huge amount of short clips, many of them non-nude. As an encyclopedia of movie star near-nudity or nudity, it does a good job. I just wish the quality of the clips was better, the clips were longer to include a build-up to the scene to give it greater impact. As a site of erotic content, it's disappointing. 02-25-20  09:21am Replies (0) Review 216 My Naked Dolls (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Up to 4k and 80mpx photos and videos -easy to cancel or modify your subscription -Content is erotic glamour photos and videos. Basically softcore. Mainly solo models, but some sets with masturbation and toys and girl/girl scenes. -Secure login and member pages (https). -Easy navigation. This is basically a small site, you have photo sets and videos of different models. You can search for a model's content, but other than that, the search seems pretty useless. -You can tag your favorite photo sets, videos and models for easy access. -There is little to no advertising for other sites on the member pages, which is a rarity. -There is no pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. -Low annual price is $45/year recurring. The other memberships don't make a lot of sense, because they price a monthly membership or other membership options way too high. -Members can vote to like or dis-like the photo sets and videos, and post comments on the photo sets and videos. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): Negative comments are allowed, and not deleted. Unlike some sites, which remove negative comments by members almost immediately. -Files download with the default title of the set or video plus the name of the model. -The watermark for the site is small and placed at the bottom right corner of the photo, so it's basically out of the way. CONS(START OF): -The cons are basically minor. -To log in, you have to check a box to prove you are not a robot (this is a simple captcha, that is easy to check). -The site is basically softcore glamour. With the emphasis on solo models. If you want hardcore eroticism, this site is not for you. -There is a news section, but it's barely used. He was trying to upgrade the content, add a personal touch to the site. But aside from a few photos of some models, and a few replies by members, this section could be deleted. What it shows is that Tony Murano does not visit the site very often. Bottom Line: Number of photo sets: 656 Number of videos: 75 Most of the site content is exclusive. There is at least one photo set that was previously posted at MetArt years ago. The videos can be streamed or downloaded in 360p, 540p, HD, Full Hd. The photo sets can also be streamed or downloaded 360, 540p, HD, Full Hd. The photo sets can also be streamed and/or downloaded in Ultra HD, as well. I rated the site with a 90 on my review that I posted on 2018-05-13. The main factors for the high score, and recommendation, were: -I enjoy the work of Tony Murano, the contributing photographer. He has an eye for attractive models. The models are in their late teens or early twenties. The site is basically softcore nude glamour. There are videos, but most of the content is photo sets. This is not a mega site like MetArt, MPL Studios, Femjoy. It's the work of one photographer. But it has 656 photo sets of attractive models, 75 videos. The annual price is $45, which seems like a bargain. The low price, combined with the quality of the softcore glamour sets, gives the site a score of 90. That's my opinion. TBP rated this site a score of 78 in 2017-08-04. I can only assume the reviewer was not as impressed with the quality of the photo sets as I am. The site did a recent update for the public preview, where they made the public preview page more attractive. But they also updated a new pricing schedule, that makes the membership price much higher, except for the 1-year recurring membership at $45, which is a drop from the $50/year former price. The prices for the other membership terms are way out of line: they price a non-recurring membership for 1 month at $30, or a non-recurring membership for 1 year at $75, when you can join for $45/year recurring. And unless you are a complete newbie, you will realize you can join any recurring membership, to get a lower rate, and then cancel as soon as you want, if you don't want to get rebilled. Whoever decided on the new membership pricing plans made a serious mistake: he has probably turned away a lot of potential members who might have sampled the site at a lower monthly rate. Which is a shame, because these sites need members to support the site financially. 02-11-20  03:29am Replies (0) Review 217 The Life Erotic (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Site is part of the MetArt network of sites. So the level of attractiveness of the models is above average, and the site navigation is above average. -No download limits, no streaming limits. -PU offers a site discount of $19.99/month recurring. -with a catalog of thousands of models and photosets, there is a wealth of gorgeous models to browse. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Poor search engine. Considering that this is one of the smaller sites in the MetArt network, the poor search is suprising. If you look for the content of a contributing photographer, it only returns a portion of his content. -The MetArt network did a network update around 2019 that was supposed to make the sites faster and more responsive. I don't find the lastest network update an improvement. Opinions vary: some MetArt site members are happy with the update. -The ages of the models are creeping up, and the level of attractiveness is dropping. The attractiveness level is a personal opinion. Many site members are almost fanatical in praising the beauty of the models. -A number of photo sets have very few photos. Most of the MetArt network sites emphasize photos over videos. The model Roxio has 8 photo sets at TLE.The number of photos per set varies from 28 to 80. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): It just seems strange for a site that specializes in high resolution glamour photography to have photosets with less than 100 photos per set. Six of the Roxio photosets were first posted at the BodyInMind site (a competing site), and then resold to TheLifeErotic site. Unless you have a wide experience of softcore porn, you will probably find that most of the content at TheLifeErotic is exclusive. But there are definitely a small number of photo sets at TLE that are posted at other sites. -Beyond a few basic stats on the model, there is no information on the model. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): There's an excellent article on phone sex that can give an insight into how a phone sex operator works. The article is both readable and funny, and full of insights into sex and porn. https://www.marieclaire.com/sex-love/a20...-phone-sex-operator/ The TLE site, as part of the MetArt network, is a good site. Good, but not great. I would recommend joining the original MetArt site itself, which has, for the same price, a much larger number of models, much larger catalog of photosets and videos, far greater number of updates on a daily basis. The MetArt site is the star of the MetArt network. The MetArt site is basically softcore. Many of the other sites in the network offer a harder edge in erotic content. But in terms of softcore content, the MetArt site blows away the other sites in the network. If you are overdosed on softcore glam, then visiting one of the other sites in the MetArt network can be a worthwhile experience. But I think the original MetArt site offers better value for your money. 02-03-20  12:54am Replies (0) Review 218 Casual Teen Sex (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the 18videoz network. You get access to 9 sites. -There is a short plot to the videos. A guy runs across an attractive girl, they go to an apartment, and they quickly have sex. Not much plot, not much foreplay. So you don't have to wait to get to the good stuff (if you are the impatient porn user). -Limited lifetime membership. Even when your membership expires, you still have a free limited access to the network. You can see all picture sets, some videos, and a preview of all the latest updates. If your membership expired and your login stops working, contact support for help. (The Gamma networks have a similar lifetime membership system, where expired memberships are a limited lifetime membership.) -Very welcoming site. When you login, you see a message: "Hi there, YourMemberName." So if you're feeling lonely, log in to the site, and you will be with friends. -You can select your favorite videos, picture sets, and models. -The network started offering 4K videos in late 2016. Cons: -Security is poor for the site and the network. In the sign up process, you enter your email address on a non-secure page. When you non-secure login to the members area (your browser warns you that your login details are not secure.) -You're username and password are computer-generated, so need to write it down and enter it each time you login to the site. And your friendly browser tells you on each login that you are using a non-secure login. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -The file sizes are huge. A 1080p video file with a runtime of 27 minutes is 2.36 GB. I've never seen a 1080p video of 27 minute runtime anywhere near this large. What codec are they using? -Since my download speeds are less than 2 Mbps, downloading a video at 1080p can easily take 20 minutes or more. -When streaming a video, the video shudders when playing. My WiFi download speeds are between 17-90 Mbps, and that is more than enough to stream 1080p videos. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Thumbnails at the top and middle of the member pages are actually ads, which you don't realize until you click on them and open a new browser window that allows you to join that site. I paid for a membership, show me what I paid for, not a bunch of scenes that turn out to be ads for other sites. -The models are probably Russian. They speak in Russian, with no subtitles. But who needs subtitles? You can figure the plot is a boy picking up a girl and taking her to an apartment and then a blow job and fucking, what they say is hardly the most important part of the scene. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Casual Teen Sex stats: movies (379) Models (2235) Photosets (2426) So this is a fairly large site. The site was launched in early 2009, so it's been around a long time. The update rate is very slow. These are the listed sites you are supposed to get access to with an 18 Videoz membership: (but there might be other sites you have access to, as well): Teeny Lovers Casual Teen Sex Young Sex Parties Young Libertines Sell Your GF Teens Analyzed First Anal Date Bang My Teen Ass Porn Films 3D I've grown accustomed to high quality photos and videos from most porn sites. So the Casual Teen Sex videos and photo sets are disappointing. The sets seem cheap. The models are nice-enough looking, but very little care is taken to make them attractive. The early videos at the site were cheaply made: cheap sets, poor recording equipment, poor lighting, cheap street clothes. The same type of cheaply produced porn that Teen Mega World started off with many years ago. But the Teen Mega World network has made huge strides in improving the technical factors of their videos, along with upgrading their sets and costumes and everything else. With Casual Teen Sex site, the site has made some effort to improve the quality of the videos, but nowhere near the improvement that TMW (Teen Mega World) has done. So the overall impression is that the Casual Teen Sex videos are still cheaply made, just not as cheap as they were years ago. The videos seem like an amateur video of a guy picking up a girl on a street, taking her to his apartment, and having sex without much prelimiaries. Which expresses the casual teen sex vibe. But I still prefer the more polished videos at sites like Wow Girls, or even the Teen Mega World sites. I'm giving the Casual Teen Sex site a score of 79. That is very subjective. The site, as part of the 18videoz network gives you access to about 9 hardcore teen sites. That means thousands of teen models. Many of them attractive, although not much effort is put into making them attractive. But they are young and naturally attractive. The best way to enjoy these videos is to think of yourself as a fly in the air or on the wall (if inside an apartment) who is watching two or more people having sex, without a lot of meaning behind it. And ignore most thumbnails of hot girls that litter each page: because they are just hot links to open a new page to join some other site. I would recommend spending your money on a different site, where the videos (and photos) are more impressive. 01-21-20  09:19am Replies (0) Review 219 X Chimera (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -I saw an ad for a low-priced sub to X Chimera. The models looked attractive. Went to the site, thinking about a join. Discovered site is part of the Lets Doe It network, which I'm already a member of. I have too many subs, don't have enough time to enjoy all of them. Glad that I found it was a site that I already have access to, because I don't want to pay for a sub that I already have. -As part of the Lets Doe It network, the X Chimera channel has many fine-looking models. These are mainly European models, many from Russia or the surrounding areas. -The production values of the videos are excellent. The lovely models are presented attractively. The crown jewel of the network is The White Box, where lovely models are presented in high glamcore erotic settings. But X Chimera also features lovely models in erotic settings. So what's the difference between the two channels? Both channels use lovely models, but at The White Boxxx, extra care is used to make the models appear attractive. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): You have to watch the videos at the two sites to see what I mean. -Videos (and photosets) are advertised as exclusive. So unless you are a fan of tube sites, the material will be new to you. -Each photoset has a zip file. But see cons why the photosets are a disappointment. -You can stream or download the scenes in your choice of definition: 240p thru 1080p. CONS(START OF): -For some reason, even though my internet download speeds test at 17 Mbps to about 90 Mbps (these are WiFi speeds, not hard-wired speeds), the videos often hang on loading, and I can't stream the videos. (17 Mbps is supposed to be more than enough speed to stream 1080p videos. And I'm watching these videos at 720p or 480p, which increases the margin of safety even more. But it doesn't work: these videos constantly hang up, instead of loading and playing smoothly. I don't know what the problem is. But I suspect this is my problem. And most members won't have this problem. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Two pre-checked cross-sales on join page. -The biggest con for most people would be this is an archive channel. The last update was 2018-10-12. -It's a small site. Only 35 videos. Since it's not updating, it won't grow. -Another con is that even though there is a photo set accompanying each scene, the photosets are tiny. Each photoset has 10 photos or less. Many of the models are gorgeous, they deserve a full-sized photoset, to show off their beauty. -There is a download limit of 100 videos per month. There is no download limits on the photosets, but since the photosets are tiny (10 photos or less per set), the value of the photosets are debatable. Even with a gorgeous model, if you only have a maximum of 10 photos in a set, unless the photographer does a fantastic job, the photo set is more like a tease than a meal to be savored and enjoyed. Maybe I'm being too picky. You can use a single photo from the set to illustrate what the model looks like, to remind you what the scene is about. Except that it would take time and energy to select a photo to illustrate each scene(put it in the folder where the video file is kept). And I'm lazy about organizing my collection. Keep it simple, keep it easy, don't make me work to organize my porn collection. -Photosets only have a single definition: no choice of low, medium or high definition. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The channel mixes attractive European models in a fantasy setting where the male model dresses like a rich dude who is getting off on teasing and seducing a beautiful model. So it's like a bondage scene, without the roughness and without the pain. The stunt cock is supposed to be teasing the tied-up model with his hands, lips, tongue, and various toys, into a creature of lust who only wants his cock. So this is a glamcore version of bondage. On the style of the 50 Shades of Grey movies. Although with even less pain. The 50 Shades of Grey movies are softcore porn, but the heroine (Dakota Johnson) is supposed be feeling some actual pain from the whipping and slapping, but at X Chimera, there is not supposed to be any physical pain, except the torture of heated lust that is not immediately satified. So this channel is the erotic equivalent of a hardcore Harlequin novel, before the Harlequin novels allowed any sex (back the 1970s). The setup or plot used is that an attractive women is invited by a mysterious member of a secret, wealthy society. The woman is excited to accept. She goes to an expensive home, where she is bathed by two naked women attendants, and then led to a room where a mysterious man is waiting. The woman can be tied or chained, the man or woman can wear a mask, and the man arouses the women to the point of frenzy (the man is a masterful lover who fulfills the woman's wildest fantasies). Both the man and the woman have powerful orgasms. Although the idea is good, it gets repetitious after a while. Even when the women are lovely, and the stunt cocks are attractive men, you wish that there was more variation in the plot. Maybe I'm just getting overdosed on porn. But I enjoy the simple massage videos at Tricky Masseur. The models are lovely young teens, not presented as attractively as the models at X Chimera, but the plot is simpler, and I the model doesn't need to be an actress to enter a room, undress, get on a massage table, get rubbed down, and then do a partial blow job and and then fuck. Simpler acting. More believable. Easier to enjoy, because there's less strain on the brain. Lately, I've been switching off DVDs of disappointing movies that I think are stupid. I don't have the patience that I used to. Why waste time on junk? And that's why I am somewhat disappointed in the X Chimera channel. It's a good idea. They are riffing on the 50 Shades of Grey theme of glamourous sex of a lovely woman with a rich dude from a secret society. But even though the women are lovely, it's too much play-acting for me. I prefer The White Boxxx channel, where the setup is simpler. My personal opinion is that The White Boxxx is the finest site for glamcore porn of beautiful women. The only quibble might be that they focus more on the glamcore, and lose a bit of heat in the sex. I'm giving the X Chimera channel a score of 90. That's because the channel is a good to excellent glamcore site, and also because if you get bored with the channel, you can switch to other good sites in the network. 01-13-20  12:46am Replies (0) Review 220 Porno Academie (0) 59.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -The channel (sites are called channels in the network) is part of the Lets Doe It network. You get access to the entire network of 17 channels. You don't have to pay extra for access to any channel. -Videos have a hot link to skip the intro section, which is an ad for the channel. -The videos are professionally shot: good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control, nice sets. But the videos are basically junk, not exciting or worth viewing or worth saving. A real disappointment, because there are some hot models, but they are wasted in stupid videos at this channel. -The content is exclusive. -The login and member pages are https (secure from hacking). Cons: -I assume the site was filmed in France. Most of the models speak in French. Which could give an exotic flavor to the porn. Except the plots are so stupid, the acting so poor, that the channel detracts from the network value. -The channel is an archive. The last update was 2018-08-30. -The channel is small. Only 36 scenes. --Each scene has a matching photo set. But the photo sets are tiny. 10 photos per photo set. When the girls are very pretty, they deserve a larger number of photos in their set. -Photo sets download with a generic computer-generated file name, such as 5e18eb4799ccd.zip. So you have to rename, to show the site, model, date posted. That's if you think the photo sets are worth collecting, which I doubt. -Photo sets download in one definition only: no choice of low, medium or high definition. But since the photo sets are hardly worth collecting, this is a minor fault. -The channel is one of the poorest in the network. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): Most of the girls are below the attractive level of the better channels in the network. The plots are stupid. The sex is clumsy. -If they decided to delete this channel, the overall value of the network would not be affected. -The network has a monthly download limit of 100 videos. I don't think any of the videos are worth downloading, even when the model is cute. Alessandra Jane, Lana Rhoades, Selvaggia and Tetti Dew Korti are some of the more attractive models featured at this channel, but none of their videos are worth saving. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): This channel is a French version of porn, where the men are complete idiots who think they are teaching young girls their proper place in life, which is to pleasure men. French chic is supposed to be sophisticated, but the teachers and principal act like adolescent boys who fumble their way through sex. So the sex is raw, and the men act like jerks. Category is school girls. Some of the models are cute. But the plots are stupid. And the sex is boring and awkward. If you have any experience watching porn, you've seen these scenes done much better, where the models are presented more attractively. Or with hotter action. My recommendation would be for the network to delete this channel. Some of the channels have videos that feature real glamcore videos, or hotter videos. And where the plot and acting is less cringe-worthy. I'm giving the channel a score of 59. And that is generous. Actually, reading my previous review of the channel, that I wrote 2019-06-20, I also recommended deleting the channel, since it drags down the value of the network. I gave the channel a score of 75 at the time. Now I'm giving it a score of 59, which better reflects my opinion of the channel's value. This is a channel that detracts from the value of the better channels in the network: The White Boxxx is an excellent glamcore channel. Bitches Abroad is a strongly erotic channel of girls having sex in Europe. A Girl Knows is a good lesbian channel with some really attractive models and enjoyable sex. Porno Academie has some very attractive models, that are wasted in stupid videos. The models are not presented attractively. Which degrades the value of the videos. The plot is either stupid or boring. Which degrades the vaue of the videos. The acting is poor. Watching these videos is a waste of time. They are not erotic. They are not hot. They are stupid shit. (Sorry for the French language. Get the joke? You use the work "French" in polite conversation to indicate off-color activity. And this appears to be a channel shot in France.) 01-10-20  03:02pm Replies (0) Review 221 Wow Porn (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -One of my favorite hardcore teen sites. -The girls range from attractive to fucking gorgeous. -High production values. The videos are clear and crisp, the colors are strong, the sound control is good, the camera-work is excellent. -If you join Wow Porn, Wow Girls, or All Fine Girls, you have immediate access to all 3 sites. That's the system they've been using for over 1 year. -Vendo is the billing processor. Easy to cancel. Vendo website clearly shows you any subs you have that are billed through them, both current and recent past subs. -Navigation is simple. I consider the 3 sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) to be basically a single site, that is marketed as 3 separate sites, to increase revenues. Cons: -I was a member of the site/network of 3 sites with an annual subscription for 3 years. I was foolish. There are often special discount prices offered during the year, but I just let my sub renew at $119.95/year. Finally, I wised up, and cancelled my membership. Then re-subscribed at a cheaper price using their discount (I used the PU link to Wow Porn, then hit the join link, so PU should get a credit for the sub.) But I saved $39/year by cancelling, and then re-subscribing. So when you join, look for a special discount, or don't join. Loyalty is not rewarded. You are charged higher prices if you blindly accept the renewal price. -Since I was not a member of the site for about 2 days, you could say my current membership is less than one month. Or you could say that my membership is over 3 years (if you ignore the two days that I was not a member). Whatever. -2 pre-checked cross-sales on join page. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Customer support can be hit or miss. I sent an email to customer support over 2 weeks ago, using their internal email system, asking what the update rate is for the 3 sites. I still haven't gotten a response. -I wrote that I consider the 3 sites as one mega site. That's because the 3 sites are the same, except for the address in your browser. If you open 3 separate browser windows, log in to All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn, and the content for each window is the same. If you have a video in All Fine Girls, that same video appears in Wow Girls and in Wow Porn. And the photo set illustrating that video also appears in all 3 sites. As I wrote before, I don't think the owners/managers are trying to trick the membership. A few years ago, the 3 sites were separate and distinct, with each site having its own content. However, even back a few years ago, a video could be placed in one site, and the matching photoset could be placed in a different site. Because the truth was, even a few years ago, although the content of each site was distinct, the three sites shared a lot of the same models, and it appeared that a video or photo set could be placed in any one of the 3 sites, because the theme of each site was teen porn. But recently, the distinction between the 3 sites has blurred: all 3 sites have the same identical content, as far as I can tell. That includes videos, photosets, updates list. The model list for All Fine Girls and Wow Girls is identical. But the model list for Wow Porn is slightly different. But aside from a minor change, you could say that all 3 sites are basically the same site. That makes managing the 3 sites easier, on a practical basis. And I haven't heard any complaints about the content of the 3 sites being the same. The sites used to have a blog where members could post comments and questions, and the staff would sometimes answer. But they dropped the blog years ago, and the staff participation seems to have dropped, as well. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): There are several main factors making this one of my favorite hardcore teen sites or network (if you want to consider the 3 sites a network, although, technically, Wow Girls and Wow Porn are owned/managed by a different owner/manager than All Fine Girls). -The models range from attractive to fucking gorgeous. -The videos mainly are high production values: clear, crisp images, excellent colors, excellent sound control, excellent camera work. -A lot of hot videos, where the models really seem to be getting off on the sex. If you are into hardcore teen porn, this site should be a worthwhile join. The sex is not overly aggressive. It's mainly consensual sex, with very little harshness or slapping or spitting or even cursing. I wouldn't call it heartcore. It's mainly one or two or more models having sex. Very little plot. But fucking gorgeous models. And the sex can be hot. The streaming and downloading are unlimited. And there is a ton of content: thousands of videos for the 3 sites, most videos have a matching photoset, plus there are other photosets as well. Wait for a special discounted price, which seems to be happening throughout the year, and join for a month. Or longer. Giving the site (and network) a score of 95. I highly recommend joining, especially if you get a discounted price less than $90/year. 01-09-20  08:03am Replies (0) Review 222 Teen Fidelity (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -If you join Teen Fidelity, Porn Fidelity, or Kelly Madison, you get access to all 3 sites. -There are special discounts throughout the year where you can join for $9.95 for the first month. -You choose your own username and password, which is easier to remember than some computer-generated login detail. -The login and member pages are https. Which means it's harder to hack. -The videos are vivid and crisp. The storylines can be imaginative: I don't mean science fiction or fantasy, but there is a plot with a dark sense of humor. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -There is a "Bonus Content" section that advertises 100,000+ scenes. I'm not sure what that includes. I have too many subs, I don't have the time to look them over, I even forget which subs I have active. But the Bonus Content appears to be access to a huge amount of hardcore videos from different sources. Some of the featured channels are Party Hardcore, Mr Skin, Vivid, and Club Seventeen. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): I click on the Club Seventeen link, and see DVDs listed. I click on the DVD for "Sweethearts Porn Tour 4", and see Barbamiska, one of my all-time favorite porn models in action. Such a tiny bundle of sex, smiley face, small, tender breasts, a wet dream come true. CONS -You can often find specials for the first month of $9.95, but the renewal price is $29.95/month. And the price for 3 months is $59.95, recurring. So this is an expensive network if you want a longer-term membership. -In the bonus content section, when you click on a DVD, and bring up a scene, they don't list the name of the model. So you can't search the videos for your favorite models by name. That's a shame, because there appears to be a huge amount of content in the bonus section (they advertise 100,000+ scenes), and the navigation is hit-and-miss searching. However, there are so many gems I can see right away, that the bonus section by itself is worth a membership. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): If they organized the bonus content with a good search engine and a few other improvements, the bonus section would be a strong challenger to the Adult Time network. -Please don't mis-understand. The Porn Fidelity, and Teen Fidelity and Kelly Madison sites have strong videos that are well worth watching. But the Bonus Content, although the video crispness does not match the 3 main sites, is also well worth watching. -The bonus content is streaming only. You can't select different difinitions. You can't download. It's almost like a tease, because I'd love to save some of these video gems. -For the bonus content, the controls are limited: no way to select definition for streaming (just a single default definition), can not watch in full screen, etc. -Sometimes you get an error message: "A network error caused the media download to fail part-way." Checking my PC, it does not appear that the video failed to download to my PC. So I assume the error message means that the video is not available for streaming at the moment. Except that when I try to stream it, it does stream. (As I already mentioned, you can't download the bonus content.) BOTTOM LINE Dixie Lynn in "Pause Challenge" shows a fresh face in porn (at least, one I haven't seen before). She has one video at Teen Fidelity. She gives a great impression of a bubbly teenager, or else she really is a bubbly teenager with lots of enthusiasm. The content at Teen Fidelity is well worth viewing. They have A-list porn stars, good sets, good lighting and sound control, good camera-work. The content is excellent quality. The site is large, with around 400 videos plus matching photo sets. For the special price of $9.95 for the first month, you are getting more than your money's worth. I don't see a listing for a 1-year membership, but it could cost over $200, which is very expensive, considering there are many fine networks available at $100 or less. The site and network are easy to use, navigation is not a problem for the 3 main sites. The bonus section does have issues, such as search problems, you can download bonus content, you can only stream in one definition, and other issues. I'm giving the Teen Fidelity a score of 92, because the videos have a strong, erotic flavor that is refreshing, and you get 2 other great sites included in a membership. You also get the bonus content: which is definitely worth looking over. With the bonus content, you have to use a hunt and peck approach, there is no search engine to find a particular model or scene, that I can find. But some of the content, although from years ago, is worth viewing: I just wish I could download some of the bonus content of some of my favorite models. Maybe I will join those sites directly, when I have more time. I already have more subs, both porn and non-porn, that I can't enjoy because there's only 24 hours in a day, and I have subs to Netflix, Starz, Amazon Prime, Hulu, as well as a bunch of porn sites that I don't have the time to visit very much. But I would give Teen Fidelity an A for quality of content, A for amount of content, and A for value: you are more than getting your money's worth (at least for the $9.95 for the first month membership). But the longer term memberships are very expensive, so they have less value. 12-31-19  09:49am Replies (0) Review 223 Nuru Massage (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Nuru Massage is part of the Adult Time network. You get access to over 50,000 premium hardcore videos at the Adult Time network. -I don't have good information on the pricing of the different memberships to either Adult Time or Nuru Massage, because I'm a current member of Adult Time, so if I click on a hot link of an offer to join Adult Time, I go directly to the Adult Time membership pages, bypassing the posted prices to join. -PU shows a discounted price of $9.95 for the first month of Adult Time, though whether that includes downloading is not shown. The price jumps to $29.95 after the first month. Adult Time also runs special prices on ads of $5.00 for the first month, or $9.95 for the first month, for streaming only access. -PU shows a discounted price of $14.95 for the first month for a direct subscription to Nuru Massage (which includes access to the Adult Time network), recurring at $29.95/month. I assume that would include downloading. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Nuru Massage is a large channel on Adult Time, with 635 videos listed for a search of "Nuru Massage". CONS(START OF): -The navigation can be clunky at times. They are updating/changing the network structure. A while ago, it was easier to select a channel, and see clearly the number of videos at the channel, and to find a listing of the channel videos in chronological order. That seems to have vanished, in the currrent structure, at least for channels with a large number of videos. I open the Adult Time channel member page, select the "channels" hot link, type in Nuru Massage in the search box, hit my Enter key, and it brings up: 'Search results for "nuru massage"' Videos -Thumbnails for a few videos, that I assume are from the Nuru Massage channel; Pornstars -Thumbnails for a few porn stars, that I assume are featured in Nuru Massage videos; Channels -View all channels hot link, which I assume will bring up a listing (partial) of all channels for Adult Time network. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): Movies -View all movies; And other thumb nails/hot links to other channels in the Adult Time network. They previously had a tremendous amount of content, but it was easier to navigate, with less steps to find specific channels, to find the content at each channel. But they are fucking up the Adult Time network, because the site programmers don't bother to keep the navigation simple: instead, they are adding channels, and making the network a jumbled mess. So instead of adding value to the network, by adding more content and more channels, they are making the network harder to use, which decreases the value of the network, by making it harder to find the content of each channel. Formerly, it was easy for me to go to some of my favorite channels (such as Pure Taboo), and examine the content at the channel, either by chronological listing, or by porn star. But now I have a hard time reviewing Nuru Massage, because I can't easily find a simple listing of the channel's contents. And this review is messed up, because I'm trying to focus on the Nuru Massage channel, but the Adult Time network navigation problems keep getting in the way of a simple review of Nuru Massage. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): With 635 videos at the Nuru Massage channel, there are a huge amount of porn stars in these videos. Many are A-list stars. Heather Starlet, Elsa Jean, Kyler Quinn, Dakota Skye, Kenna James, the list goes on and on. They try to add a plot to the Nuru Massage videos. The plot is usually a short lead-in the the massage and sex. The plot, as is usual for most porn videos, is fairly stupid and unbelievable. And the acting skills of the porn models is rudimentary. So why bother with a plot? It shows the producers are trying to make the sex video more interesting or worthwhile than just a straight hardcore porn video showing two or more bodies slapping against each other. But some sites do or a much better job, with the plot element actually adding value to the sex. Pure Taboo is a channel that features twisted plots, great production values, some really interesting videos that can be very erotic. The Porn Fidelity and Teen Fidelity sites can also have interesting plots, great production values, and very erotic videos. The Nuru Massage videos feature stupid plots, that you have to be really drunk to believe, or are better ignored. Some of the models are very attractive, so that can make the videos worth watching. If you're watching these videos with a partner, it's an excellent reason to get drunk, because that would be a great lead-in to having real-life personal sex while watching these videos. Kenna James has a Nuru Massage video. The plot is stupid, the acting is poor, but Kenna James is fucking attractive. So if you can ignore the stupid plot and poor acting, you can watch Kenna James seduce her stepfather: all in the interests of bringing her family closer together. Bottom line: Since the plots are so silly, and the acting is amateurish, I much prefer other sites that feature massage-themed sex. The Tricky Masseur site at Teen Mega World is one of my favorites. The same videos at Tricky Masseur are also featured at the Diesel network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), at Rub A Teen (part of the Team Skeet network), at 18 Virgin Sex, and probably at other sites, as well. In those videos, the plot is simpler: a girl walks into a room for a massage, she undresses, the masseur rubs her down, she becomes aroused, and they have sex. The simpler plot is easier to act, and more believable. And the girls in those videos are mainly attractive. And the sex can be hot. Which is why I much prefer those simple massage videos over the nuru massage videos. The Dane Jones massage videos also keep the plot simpler, which is much easier to act, easier to accept, than the Nuru Massage videos. Since I don't appreciate the Nuru Massage videos, I'm giving the channel a score of 79. But if you include access to the rest of the Adult Time network, the score would jump to the 90s or more. SEE THE FIRST REPLY TO THIS REVIEW FOR A SAMPLE DESCRIPTION OF A NURU MASSAGE VIDEO. 12-31-19  02:24am Replies (1) Review 224 Quest For Orgasm (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the LetsDoeIt network. Network has 17 channels (down from over 40 channels previously). All channels are open, there are no premium channels you have to pay extra for. -The network features hardcore porn. The selection of models range from attractive to fucking gorgeous. The White Boxxx is the crown jewel of the network, because the channel features gorgeous models presented in a glamcore setting that showcases the models in erotic videos. -You can choose to use a credit card or paypal to join. -Vendo is the billing agent. Vendo site is easy to use, easy to cancel. -You choose your password, instead of computer-generated. -Join, login, and member pages are https. -Navigation is easy. Easy to switch between channels. -PU lists a discounted price of $9.95/month (recurring). PU also lists$99.95/year. But when I hit the link to LetsDoeIt, it showed a price of $79.95/year, and I joined at that price. -The content is exclusive. Cons: -2 pre-checked cross-sales on join page. -Slow download speeds. I average 1 Mbps on my WIFI network. When I do an internet speed test, I get anywhere from 15-90 Mbps. So I get very slow download speeds for video files. It's not a problem with the photo sets, because the photo set files are so small (only 6 photos per photo set). My internet connection is supposed to 200 Mbps from Spectrum. That is the hard-wired speed, not the WIFI speed (WIFI is always slower than a hardwired connection). -I get a lot of failed video downloads from the site. Don't know what is causing the problem. Not only are the download speeds slow, but they often fail, which reduces the download limit you're allowed, because a failed download is counted the same as a successful download. -Quest For Orgasm is an archive site. Last video was added 2017-09-04. That's a shame because they have some really lovely models. -The channel only has 80 videos. -There is a download limit of 100 videos/month for the network. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): The network has a lot of beautiful models. Not all videos will appeal to every PU member, but there are a lot of videos that are worth saving. -Each video has an accompanying photo set, but the photo sets are tiny. The photo sets I downloaded only had 6 photos per set. Some of these models are lovely to gorgeous. They deserve a larger photo set. -The photo sets only download in one definition. No choice of high, medium or low. -The name of each photo set appears to be computer generated. Example file names are 5e00e2d6d6379 and 5e00e2d6d6379. So you have to manually re-name the file to show the site, model, video title, date posted. -There is very little personal details about the model listed. Name of model, country of origin, a brief description her body(which can be misleading or wrong). BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The site features lovely models masturbating to orgasm. There isn't much variety in the sex action. You have a solo girl, and she's masturbating. Usually with a sex toy (a small or large vibrator, but also fingers or a dildo). The main attraction is how lovely some of these girls are. The videos run from 20 to 30 minutes. They usually start off with a brief interview of the model, who states where she lives, some activities she likes to do, hobbies, etc. The girls are presented as girl-next-door types, not porn stars. Just girls who have a normal, healthy appetite for sex. Which they are satisfying with masturbation. Since there are no boy-girl or girl-girl scenes at this channel. Some of the interviews can be interesting. The interview can be 10 minutes or less. The models speak freely. They seem to be giving their real thoughts, what's it's like to be a porn model, having sex as a job. So you get a connection to the girls, which makes it more real than just watching a porn video. These are European models, who come from Russia, Czech, Serbia, Spain, etc. So if you have a partner, you can always claim that you joined the site because you wanted to learn more about people from Europe. This network is very educational, because I look up the countries to see where the beautiful girls are coming from. And with the way countries are splitting and new ones are emerging, I need wikipedia to show me what's what. Jessica Spielberg is labelled as "slim, small natural tits." She is a lovely model. But I would describe her as normal build, not slim. And her breasts are medium-sized, not small. She has one video at Quest For Orgasm, another video at Bitches Abroad. She is presented as a lovely, adorable girl at Quest For Orgasm. Just fucking lovely. I may be crazy, but she's so innnocent-looking in her Quest for Orgasm video, where she reaches several orgasms masturbating. In the Bitches Abroad video, she comes across a little differently. She's a tourist looking at a map of Prahal (Czech for Prague), and she asks a guy for directions. The guy is Kristof Cale, who offers to help find her destination, but first he takes her to his apartment; he tells her he has to change his clothes before he will show her where to go. At his apartment, she starts to eat a pastry he gives her, and he starts to get undressed in front of her. She walks forward to look at his exposed cock, and she offers him a bite of the pastry he gives her, they start kissing, he takes the pastry away and throws it on the floor, and BOOM! It's time for sex. Maybe I'm missing the point. Is this a European thing, where you skip the preliminaries, and go for hard-and-fast fucking? Or maybe this is the European version of seduction. I definitely need a European vacation, where I can find a model like Jessica Spielberg. I'm giving the channel a score of 78. The slow download speeds are irritating. The failed downloads are irritating. The tiny number of photos in a photo set (6 photos per set) is poor. Some of these models are lovely, and deserve larger photo sets. This is an archive site. Stopped updating in September 2017. 12-24-19  02:31am Replies (0) Review 225 All Fine Girls (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Vendo is the biller. I count this as a positive, since I've had many memberships with Vendo and never had a problem. The Vendo website is easy to use: shows you your current and past memberships. -Membership in any one of 3 sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) gives you immediate access to all 3 sites. -The main positive of the 3 sites are the level of attractiveness of the model list. The girls range from attractive to lovely. They are almost all teens, at least when they started for the sites. Many of these girls could enter any beauty contest in the world (except that their porn background would probably get them disqualified). -The quality of the videos and photo sets are first rate. Clear, crisp images, excellent lighting, fine camera-work. --They often have discounted membership prices throughout the year, where the list price is discounted from $120 to $90 or less for an annual membership. Or you can choose a monthly membership. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Videos end with a short "Highlights in Slow Motion", which showcases the climax of the scene. -You can watch the entire video, or selected parts by choosing a thumbnail of the section you want to watch. -You can stream or download the videos in 480p, 720p, 1080p. Some videos have a 4K option, which is 3840x2160. The file size for 4K videos can easily exceed 6 GB, which requires a lot of storage space. And a high end monitor to get the benefit to watch them. CONS(START OF): The comments are under-used and not very helpful. If more members posted comments about the site, that would give further information on how to use the site. Years ago, the 3 sites had a blog, where the members and staff could post questions and answers and news about the site. Blog disappeared years ago. Bottom Line: Shen has written some excellent reviews, and has pointed out some facts that can make a video worthwhile viewing or a boring waste of time: the acting level of the performer can make a huge difference in the impact of a video. Porn performers are not noted for their acting skills. "the instigator tends to be the better actor - reluctance is a skill talent often overlook". But when the female does an excellent job playing a reluctant woman who is slowly seduced into sex, it can elevate the scene greatly. There are some real gems at the Wow Girls/Wow Porn/All Fine Girls sites, where you find not only attractive models, but the storyline and play-acting come together to make an arousing video. Ivi Rein is a nice looking model. She's not the most beautiful, but no PU member would kick her out of bed if he ever got so lucky to find her there. The video "Exposing Lust For Anal" shows Ivi Rein acting as a shy young teenager who tries to discourage her boyfriend from anal sex. The boyfriend is pressuring Ivi. So Ivi talks with a sympathetic sex counselor who tries to calm her fears. There is a slow build-up between the sex counselor and Ivi, and they start kissing and making out. Ivi Rein and the sex counselor both speak with a foreign accent (Russian?), and they speak softly. So I can't understand a lot of what they are saying. But the sex counselor moves from the couch facing Ivi to sit next to her on the couch, and because he is so warm and sympathetic, he puts his arms around her and they start kissing, then he starts stroking her thigh (as a professional, he is allowed to seduce his attractive clients, it's part of the Russian culture where the male is obligated and even programmed to seduce attractive young women). In a short while, he is kissing her, touching her all over, removing her clothing. But it's not forced. She is a shy young girl who has sexual needs that her boyfriend is ignoring. And as good Russians, Ivi and the sex counselor have oral sex, then vaginal and anal sex. So the sex counselor has done a fine job allaying Ivi's fears about anal sex. But it begs the question: does Ivi start to have anal sex with her boyfriend, or does she stay with the sex counselor, who happens to be married? If you have access to the Wow sites, I highly recommend this video, because it's one of the better erotic videos at the 3 sites. And it's due to the fine acting by Ivi, which adds to the emotional impact of the scene. If you join this site, make sure you write down your login details (username and password). The confirming email for my sub confirmed I had a sub, but did not show the login details. I went to the Vendo site, and clicked the hot link to send me my login details. I immediately got an email from Vendo, which showed the text "username" and "password", but the space after those text lines was blank. Computer error, or maybe some computers don't like me. The site is not perfect. The support staff paid more attention to the members' concerns in previous years. I sent customer support an email a few days ago asking if all 3 sites were updating, or if not, were there any plans to update all 3 sites. No response to the email. The 3 sites, because of the top-notch quality of the teen models, the quality of the videos and photosets, is one of my favorite hardcore teen networks. Along with Teen Mega World. At both networks, the girls are mainly real teens. And they have an appetite for sex that clearly shows. And the quality of the content is good to excellent. And the navigation is good. (Note: I've said it before, if you are going to join Teen Mega World, join through the main Teen Mega World site, and not through one of the satellite sites: if you join through one of the satellite sites in Teen Mega Word, your search is limited to the site you join through: so most of the content of the network is basically hidden from your view, unless you want to spend hours searching through each site to see what content is available at that site.) -There is very little personal information about the models. -Although the 3 sites feature both softcore and hardcore porn, some models only have softcore porn at these sites, even though the can have hardcore porn at outside sites. Mili Azul has 27 videos + 48 photo sets, but they are all softcore: No guys allowed in these videos or photo sets. But at outside sites, she has boy/girl videos and sets. Clarice is a slender young white girl. Adorable. She, like Mila Azul, is featured at many porn sites. At the All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn sites, Clarice has 4 videos + 12 photo sets. But she does not have intercourse with a guy (although she does touch a guy's penis while another model fucks the guy). But there are outside sites where Clarice is giving a blowjob, or having intercourse. The hardcore videos of Clarice are rare: she is either solo, or usually with one or more girls in lez action. Giving the site a score of 95. (REVIEW CONTINUES IN REPLY.) 12-17-19  04:26am Replies (2) Shown : 201-225 of 247 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.35 seconds.