Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
1Pondo.tv
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-attractive models
-decent video quality, I mostly downloaded the "middle" quality 704x396 1200 kbps avi, reasonably crisp. The HD video is 4000 kbps and decent, but I didn't download many of these given the file size.
-decent download speeds, better than 1MB/s most times I tried
-little to no cencorship, I didn't see any in the videos I downloaded
-no drm
-download managers sort of work
-customer service is friendly and helpful
-good sized site 1672 videos at time of review |
| Cons: |
-quite expensive
-navigation is poor, typically you just have to look through every video offered
-ads on site, some of which are in japanese, so you have to be careful where you click
-movies can be long, although this is typical of japanese porn, most are more than 40 minutes
-join process is a nuisance, can't join with a web-based email service for some reason
-billing through their company, DTI
-there is supposedly a 6-gig limit, although I must never have hit it, as I never got cut off.
-not much in the way of photosets |
| Bottom Line: |
This was a tough site for me to review, I found the model quality overall to be very good, however it is hard to say if it is worth the price. If the price were more in-line with other sites, I would probably score this place in the high 80s. I think if you are really into Japanese porn, but don't like the mosaic that is typically found, this site might be worth joining. If it is just an occasional fancy, I would probably look for something cheaper.
Like much of the Japanese porn I have seen, the scenes can be somewhat odd to a westerner, but personally I find them pretty hot for the most part. Toy use is frequent, and creampies are the most common ending, and lesbian content is pretty rare, unless you count group as lesbian (which they do).
To answer a comment from earlier, while some of the women are shaven, I found the ratio to be pretty typical of other sites in this niche I have joined, mostly hairy, some trimmed, few shaven.
Aside from dropping the price, it would be nice if they improved the navigation. Their are some dead links, some that lead to "movie removed" pages, and their index of material types I found to be pretty worthless. It would also be nice to have some more photos, for the most part they are just screen caps, and no zips are available.
Overall I think this is a decent site, that is too highly priced. The model quality and video quality are both good, and the lack of censorship is great. It might be a place to consider if this is one of your favorite niches. However, if not, I'd probably save the money and join jsex or something of the sort for half the price (even though most of their stuff is censored). Also, this is definitely not a place for fans of photos. |
|
03-26-11 12:30am
Replies (4)
|
Review
27
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Decent number of models, hard to get an exact figure but pretty large collection
-No DRM on newer videos, appears to have started in 2009 as well, but only for some models
-Zip downloads of some of the newer photosets (seems like this started in 2009 for the most part)
-Some attractive ladies
-Download managers work, although there isn't much to download with them
-Good photography
-Decent price with TBP
-Navigation is acceptable although not the best
-Download speeds are decent, I got 1 MB/sec, although once again not much to download
-Newer streaming videos are decent quality |
| Cons: |
-Too many 'fake' women, although it is Playboy so what should one expect...
-Difficult to tell which of the many sites you are getting when you join
-Click on links to models and get directed to content you don't have access to
-Video quality is sub-par, 840x480 2900 kbps is the best I have seen, and it isn't well encoded for the downloadable videos
-Photo quality is mediocre, typically 1600 long-end.
-Prechecked cross sell
-Too many adds, up-sells, and other junk on the site
-It just takes to much time to go through it all, I doubt I will |
| Bottom Line: |
To be fair, this site is pretty much what I expected, and what most people should. Overly made up, often fake breasted women in softcore photoshoots. I wish there were a greater variety of body types, but it is Playboy after all.
Given that, it isn't a terrible site, but I probably wont be joining it again unless they make it all inclusive, make all videos downloadable, and increase their video and photo specs significantly.
The main reason I joined was someone told me there was a local girl who had posed for them, which would have been interesting, but I couldn't find her, and I was in the mood for some softcore material. Probably should have just joined MetArt again or something, but oh well.
It is hard for me to be too harsh with this place, because I was well aware of this companies faults, and pretty much expected what I got, although for some reason I thought the TV stuff was included with the subscription, but I guess it isn't. Or at least I can't find it, not that I would watch it much anyways.
Probably an okay place to join if you are into the not-so-endangered large breasted american blonde and very soft softcore, but it is definitely hard to recommend. |
|
03-18-11 01:22am
Replies (2)
|
Review
28
|
VideosZ
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Large site
-Decent price with PU discount
-Download managers work
-No DRM
-5 new DVDs per day
-watermark is usually acceptably sized, but there are some annoying cases - see cons.
-There are some decent scenes I haven't seen elsewhere
-Vids available in two sizes: mp4 "high" and xvid "medium-low".
-Streaming is acually pretty decent for medium and low - minimal buffering. Not so great on high, see below. |
| Cons: |
-content is pretty varible, an aweful lot of crap to sort through
-prechecked cross-sell
-navigation isn't the best, I didn't find keywords too helpful, lots of mislabeled stars or stars under multiple names (why don't they combine them I mean for April Flowers, there is also an April with practically the same headshot, come on man.)
-Download speeds aren't the best, I averaged about 500 KB/sec using DTA.
-Video quality not the best, especially on older videos. The best I downloaded was 720x540 2700 kbps total bitrate mp4, and not very crisp. I'd say worse than DVD quality.
-Some videos are not framed well (placed watermark in black space around video making full screen video effectively smaller)
-No custom scene downloads - I find this feature handy, I'm sure some might not care.
-Maybe my connection isn't "super-fast" enough, but streaming on high quality was horribly glitchy with tons of buffering. |
| Bottom Line: |
Yet another site that is far too focussed on quantity over quality. I guess it must be an advertising thing, but on most sites of this nature I'd prefer 1 or 2 decent DVDs a day than 5 stinky piles with an occasional decent film dropped in every once in a while. Unless you specifically know what or who you are looking for (bearing in mind that there are lots of name errors) this site can be quite a nuisance to browse through. It is not rare to go through a whole page of 24 DVDs and not find one decent scene to download, but perhaps I am just pickier than most.
Perhaps I am making it sound worse than it is, there are certainly some decent scenes here, it is just such a pain in the ass to find them. I gave up after two weeks of my membership, and doubt I will return again unless I stumble across a lot of spare time in the near future.
Overall I'd say this site is slightly above average, their recent implementation of user comments will probably be helpful in sorting through the trash - I found such comments helpful on videobox. Although haven't seen to many folks posting comments yet, hopefully this will pick up some. On the downside, the video quality is average at best, the navigation is sub-par for a site this large.
This site does some things well, and the price is nice with the discount. But definitely not worth being a member for more than a month every now and again.
It would be oh-so-wonderful if one of these DVD sites decided to go against the flow and focus on quality content, and less freaking gonzo. I know how they love saying they have 8722 DVDs available to download, but who gives a shit if 8000 or so of those are terrible... |
|
01-25-11 10:23pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
29
|
X-Art
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Beautiful ladies from all over
-Good photography and videography
-Good download speeds
-Download managers work
-No DRM
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Decent navigation, model index, and update index, model ratings.
-Photo quality is decent, typically available in three sizes (1200, 2000, 4000)
-Videos are not huge (edited, yay!)
-Video quality is decent (960x540 3500 kbps SD, 1920x1080 16000 kbps HD) SD is pretty crips, HD is very nice. Either Quicktime or wmv.
-3 updates per week, has been very consistent since I've been here |
| Cons: |
-Smallish site, 99 models at time of review with typically a couple of photosets per model, not as many of the models have videos - maybe 50% or so.
-Photosets can be short, espicially older sets. Although, in some cases this could be seen as a positive if they removed duplicates and whatnot.
-Videos can also be short, which is probably a con for some, but for the post part I consider it a good thing.
-No bonus content
-No real forum, but you can post comments on sets and there is a blog.
-A lot of toy use in the softcore sets, and not stripping to speak of, many sets start out pretty much nude. |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall I think this site is pretty decent. The models are very attractive for the most part and I like the mix of hardcore and softcore materails on a site that focuses a little bit more on eroticism. I definitely like the style of the shoots. I could see how some might complain that the sets are too short of the vidoes are edited pretty substantially, however I find this quite refreshing. Most sites these days post ridiculously long videos with too many closeups and way too much repetitive or unnecessary material (that just ends up wasting hard drive space or wasting my time editing the crap out). So in my opinion it is nice to see a site where they appear to be attempting to trim the sets to the material they think is best.
My main complaint with the site is that it still a little small, and has no bonus content. However, for the price with the PU discount, I think the site is definitely worth joining for a month if you are into well photographed, athletic, young women.
The mix of hardocre and midcore is nice, it would be nice to see a litttle more stripping in the midcore/softcore sets, and given that they have models from all over the place a little more ethnic diversity might be nice as well. While I did like their hardcore material, if this is the only thing you are looking for, this site probably isn't worth joining as there isn't that much of it.
Bottom line for me, with the decent price, I found this site to be worth joining, probably just for a month every now and again, but definitely worth considering. |
|
12-28-10 10:37am
Replies (2)
|
Review
30
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-attractive, mostly euro ladies
-good variety of content, ranging from very softcore to group
-reasonable update schedule usually 1 photo or video set per day
-good navigation, search, tags, model index, ratings
-custom zip downloads of photosets
-no DRM
-download managers work
-no apparent download limit
-largely original content, the newer stuff appears entirely original
-decent sized site, 308 models at the time of this review
-video quality decent, downloadable in 3 sizes for the newer videos HD wmv, high mp4, and low mp4. I usually just downloaded the high mp4 which is typically 640x360 3700 kbps and reasonably crisp.
-photo quality is good, newer photos are 4032x6048 and reasonably well photographed |
| Cons: |
-not a fan of accessing through the deisel access site
-no bonus content unless you pay extra
-if you pay extra for the bonus content, there is a lot of duplicate scenes across the network
-some of the paid bonus sites are no longer updating
-site can load sort of slow at times, even though download speeds were always better than 1 MB/sec
-since some of the material appears to be self produced by the talent, the video and photo camerawork can get a bit iffy at times |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall I think this site is pretty decent, my only hesitation with the site is whether or not it is worth the extra $10 to join the network.
Given that Policeman.net, Kamilla18.com, thespermlover.com, sashafucksdasha.com, and laythekat.com all appear to be no longer updating, it is probably not worth joining the network if you have been a member of it before. However, if you haven't it is probably worth considering spending the extra $10. While there is duplicate content all over the network, there are some unique scenes to each site, especially on the individual model sites.
Bottom line, I like the variety of the site, and that generally the photography is pretty good, especially with the softcore material. It would be nice if they could get some of the models to do more work in the studio with professional photographers, especially with the hardcore material. They could also do some work to fix some of their website load issues. Even with the sites drawbacks, I still think it is worth joining for a month if you are into attractive young ladies. |
|
12-08-10 10:06pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
31
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-attractive ladies
-interesting group content
-decent bonus material
-navigation is pretty good, they have a model index, rating system, and member comments
-no DRM
-video quality is good (mpeg-4).
-zip downloads of photosets
-download managers worked for me
-exclusive content as far as I can tell |
| Cons: |
-price is a bit high
-scenes are excessively long and large
-download speeds are inconsitent, sometimes poor
-in-browser video player is glitchy
-not a huge site 178 girls in 52 parties
-videos are broken up into pieces, although as one file they would be enormous.
-advertisements on home page |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has decent, unique content, however like some other sites from this company it can be a bit hard to get at. The files sizes are very large, and many parts of some of the scenes are just background and chit-chat. It is very necessary with this site to preview the material before downloading the content, as I have several times downloaded scenes with little to no nudity in them at all, let alone sex.
I think if you have the time and the harddrive space this site is a pretty good site for group sex action with euro ladies. However, I gave the site some demerits for the fact that it takes so long to find material you want to download and to download it.
There are definitely some attractive ladies here, and the video quality is generally good - although the camerawork can get a bit iffy at times.
Considering the bonus content available at the time I joined, this site may be worth considering if you are into group sex with euro ladies, however expect to spend a lot of time sorting through what you want to download - and expect to immediately delete some of the content you do. I'm all for having fun and drinking, however I don't think I need a 50 minute clip of some folks boozing, smoking and chatting. If only they had some better editing and made it easier to get at their material I would recommend this site more highly. |
|
12-04-10 11:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Cash For Sex Tape
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-attractive euro ladies
-chance to see the models acting naturally (although this can also be a con)
-download managers work
-no DRM
-decent network content
-video quality is pretty decent - SD DivX mpeg4, some scenes have iPod m4v vids as well
-decent sized site, only 32 couples but each one typically has 7-10 scenes
-zip downloads of photos
-original content, including some ladies i haven't seen before
-subtitled |
| Cons: |
-sort of expensive
-camerawork is poor, although this is to be expected since it all does appear to be truly "self-shot"
-only two connections allowed, so if you have two downloads going (even in a manager), can't browse site
-videos are excessively long. i like seeing some natural stuff, but a 60 minute video with 10 minutes of posing and 15 minutes of sex seems like a lot of extra material
-navigation is odd
-in-browser flash player is very glitchy, normally this wouldn't bother me but it is actually very important when the files are this large (to preview so you know what you will get)
-photo quality is poor
-download speeds inconsistent (600 KB/sec was the best I experienced)
-files are too big, 1 GB or more, given what you get
-sort of expensive
-photo quality is poor, incomplete, and often out of order in the zips |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has an interesting concept, and they do get some very attractive ladies. There are definitely some Euro pros here, but there were a few women I hadn't seen before, but maybe I just haven't been looking enough. The content is very inconsistent, and while the website can't be held responsible for the quality of the videography on self-shot scenes, they certainly could EDIT! cut out some of the camera jostling, and a good bit of the banter. I enjoy seeing the models act somewhat naturally, however this is a bit excessive.
You can see they definitely tried to make navigation better, adding keywords, a model index, and many other useful things, however if they are going to post these long-ass videos, probably the most important thing they could have included is the ability to edit the videos yourself before downloading.
They certainly have found a nice collection of attractive euro women, and it is very nice that they provided subtitles (I am one that is interested in what they are saying, I'm sure others might not care), howeve the execution is miserable. There are some scenes here that I will definitely keep, and there are many others that I might consider keeping if only the files were smaller, or the videos were better edited.
Based upon all these faults it is a difficult site to recommend, even though I somewhat liked the site. |
|
11-28-10 11:15pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
33
|
Class 3Some
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-some very attractive, i believe euro ladies
-no DRM
-download managers work
-zip downloads of photosets
-photo quality is good (3000x2000)
-video quality is good (1280x720, 8000 kbps was the best i saw)
-content appears to be exclusive |
| Cons: |
-expensive
-only 43 scenes at the time of this review
-some scenes are a little odd, there are a few where there are like 4 small scenes within the one video
-download speeds are inconsitent
-many scenes are in parts, usually 2
-wmv is only video option i saw
-no real update schedule
-navigation is poor - no model index, search, etc. just a list of scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
As a bonus site, this site is pretty decent, however if you were ever to join it as a standalone, I don't see the value. while there is some decent material here, especially if you are a fan of 1 guy with 2 or more girls, it just has too many cons to make it worth it, not to mention the size and price of the site.
I did find many of the scenes to be pretty good, the camerawork is generally better than usual and the video quality is reasonably crisp. There are definitely some scenes here that I will add to my favorites.
The content appears to be original from what I can tell, and they do have some models I haven't seen anywhere else (they have probably worked for other sites, but I haven't seen them).
Overall, an okay site as a bonus for joining oldje, but if this deal ever goes away I would probably not join unless they drop the price and/or increase the size of the site. |
|
11-23-10 01:34pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
34
|
Oldje
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Attractive euro women
-Reasonably well filmed scenes
-No DRM
-Download managers work, although mine did have some timeout problems (I tried DTA and GetRight)
-Looks to be all original content
-Scenes have a "plot" to some extent
-Zip downloads of some photosets (in rar)
-Photo quality is variable, newer material is good
-Bonus site is pretty interesting (class3-some), although has most of the same cons as this site
-Decent sized archive (300+ scenes), although about half of it is poor quality.
-Newer video quality is pretty good, 1280x720 8000 kbps was the best I saw, although the video doesn't look as good as the specs might suggest.
-The mid-aged material was decent at 720x400 3000 kbps. I don't have specs on the RM material, but the file sizes are very small and look very poor. |
| Cons: |
-Poor navigation
-Logins timeout relatively fast
-Expensive, about $40 US at current exchange rate
-Slowish download speeds, best I saw was 400 KB/s using DTA
-Poor navigation, no model index, no search function, etc.
-Older videos are RealMedia, and very poor quality.
-Some sets don't have photosets associated with them, only screencaps, and some sets don't have zips.
-Most videos are in multiple parts, between 2 and 4 was typical.
-Video quality on newer material is pretty good, older material is quite poor.
-Limited download options, newer material is wmv (high or low) older material is realmedia only (high or dialup - neither are "high")
-I have no idea what the update schedule is, no dates on the scenes, but I somehow doubt it is frequent |
| Bottom Line: |
The material on this site is pretty decent, there are certainly some attractive ladies. Personally I am not a fan of the young/old fetish, I joined mostly because of the attractive ladies.
It is a pity that the site makes it so hard to get at their content. The navigation is poor, most of the scenes do not even give the model a name. A model index would be nice, just for sorting purposes. The navigation pretty much consists of a list of scenes with some preview pictures, with 5 scenes on each page. Pretty much nothing else.
The scenes themselves are pretty good, although the editing can be a bit odd. Most of the scenes I downloaded have quite loud background music that pretty much drowns out everything else. This is one of the only sites I can think of that uses slow motion during sex scenes, and the slow motion is a bit odd to me.
I did not have any experience with customer support, so I can't comment on that. There is no user forum or anything of that nature.
I actually very much liked the bonus content. Although some of the scenes are a bit weird (like a guy has sex with two ladies, then two other ladies, etc.).
Overall I think this site is decent, it would be nice to see them provide a model index and fix some of their many download and navigation issues. Given the price, it is hard to recommend unless there are specific models you like in the preview (or you are really fond of old/young niche). The bonus site is nice, but certainly doesn't make it worth the price for me. If you like to see "attractive men" in scenes, this is most definitely not the site for you, as many are fat, old and hairy (not that there is anything wrong with that...) |
|
11-06-10 12:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Many attractive mostly euro young ladies
-Good sized site: 356 hardcore scenes (plus an additional 103 "beahind the scenes" hardcore sets), 1160 total castings.
-Good forum, webmaster is actually pretty active and answers questions from users
-newer movie quality is good from a technical standpoint - 1280x720 2500 kbps was the best I saw
-zip downloads of photosets, although there aren't a ton of photos
-download managers work
-no DRM |
| Cons: |
-large watermark on videos
-expensive
-no bonus content aside from access to some of the casting DVDs
-download speeds are inconsistent, best I got was 500 KB/sec
-some models don't get naked for very long, a few don't get naked at all
-poor navigation, although I am not sure how it could be easily improved on a site like this
-photo quality is mediocre, and only about 10% of the castings have photosets
-uses a biller I am not familiar with
-some content is available elsewhere |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall this site is pretty good and I'd recommend joining if you are a fan of casting syle videos. However, bear in mind that a lot of these videos are 90% chit-chat, 10% nudity. Some of them have sex in the casting, but the camerawork in these is pretty poor (single camera on a tripod).
His update schedule seems pretty regular, although I am not sure how long he holds onto some of these scenes before releasing them. He has a recent update of an Evelyn/Faith scene, that I would assume is several years old - although can't be sure.
The forum is quite interesting, and I believe you can access it for free. It is often curious what he says about a given model - although the forum is bilingual, with some comments in french and some in english. Either way, rare interaction you don't really see from most sites.
Overall I think this site is pretty good, Woodman definitely has a talent for getting very attractive ladies to take their clothes off - and for some to do hardcore. However, if you are not a fan of casting style videos, or are searching for particularly erotic scenes, this probably isn't the site for you. |
|
10-07-10 09:03pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
36
|
Teen Models
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
09-26-10 12:01am (Update History)
Reason: Deleted note that bonus content may not be exclusive per webmaster's response
|
| Pros: |
-Good variety of attractive ladies, mostly younger euro models
-Excellent download speeds (I averaged better than 1 MB/sec)
-Good quality photography, both size and general photography
-Zip downloads of photosets in 3 sizes
-Decent navigation
-Good bonus content
-Good price with PU discount
-Decent quality videos 1280x720 3000 kbps
-No DRM
-Some download mangers work, DTA did, GetRight didn't
-Ladies are natural from what I can tell, there are some tattoos but nothing too nasty
-Decent sized collection, 153 models with most having a few picture sets and a couple of videos at time of review
-Exclusive content as best I can tell
-Good update schedule, 4 photo sets and 3 videos on average
-Decent navigation, model index and search. |
| Cons: |
-Bills through netbilling, which I don't like, but I suppose this is personal preference
-While the models are attractive, most are pretty common, it'd be nice if they had some fresh faces
-Bonus content is a bit iffy, "HD" video has the HD frame size (1280x720), but has poor bitrate (2000 kbps or less).
-As exotics stated, it'd be nice if they named the files a little better.
-Not a huge site, still could use some more growth.
-A bit heavy on toy use/insertions for my tastes |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a pretty decent site, especially for those that like toy/masturbation content from young attractive european ladies. As with many of these types of sites I'd prefer there were more stripping and eroticism rather than just cramming stuff up in there, but it is a pretty well done site. The quality of the photography is pretty good and the model quality in general is outstanding.
The bonus content is pretty hit-or-miss. While it does provide some additional hardcore content for those that are looking for that type of material, the quality of the content is generally subpar and the navigation/use of the bonus sites isn't the best.
As Cap'n stated in his comment, if you are looking for a good quality softcore site, this isn't it. This site pretty much fits the definition of midcore.
Overall I'd say this is a pretty good site, it could use some improvement and expansion, but worth joining if you are into young fit european ladies, especially if you like harder lesbian and solo material. |
|
09-25-10 02:46am
Replies (5)
|
Review
37
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some attractive euro-teen models
-Decent sized collection, 244 models, 545 videos, 589 photo sets.
-Video quality is decent (best I saw was 1280x720 4000 kbps wmv, worst I saw was 720x480, 3000 kbps). Reasonably crisp, although not the best I've seen.
-No DRM
-Download managers work, although had some trouble with them with photosets.
-Decent navigation for a site like this, model index, model rating, and comments on scenes are available - although not always reliable
-Zip downloads of photo sets
-Decent photo quality
-Mostly hardcore, but good variety of solo and a few lesbian scenes mixed in
-Content is exclusive as best I can tell
-Bills through Epoch |
| Cons: |
-No real bonus content
-Expensive for what you get compared with some other sites
-Unreliable servers, download speeds are all over the place - 1 MB/sec one day, 200 KB/sec the next.
-Updates aren't very frequent, 7 photo sets and 7 video sets in the last month (photos and videos are usually the same scene)
-Camerawork is not the best |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall I'd say this is a decent euro-teen site. The site is not very large, although the collection is pretty well sized. For those used to seeing a boatload of content with tons of bonus sites, they might find this site lacking. It could certainly use some improvement, and more consistent download speeds would be nice.
I primarily joined the site because I knew it had content by some models I liked, so I was reasonably pleased with what I got. However, as with most sites of this nature there are some drawbacks. Model quality is somewhat inconsistent, and while some of the scenes try to have a plot it is pretty much a gonzo site.
I think this site would be a lot better if paired with the other JTCash site as a bonus, or if they just merged the two sites into one as the content is similar and they have many of the same models.
As with this company's other site, some of the scenes are a little odd (a girl screwing some guy while her mother is sleeping at the table, overly long jerking at the end, etc), and some of the models, while attractive, look like they are doing their taxes rather than having sex.
This place is probably worth joining if you are a fan of some of the models they offer. There are definitely some decent scenes here. Of course there are also plenty of not so good scenes as seems typical of most of these smaller euro-teen sites. If they offered their other site as a bonus (or lowered the price), and increased their server capacity I would probably recommend this site a little more highly. |
|
09-15-10 12:51am
Replies (2)
|
Review
38
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some attractive ladies
-Interesting concept, videos typically provide both a "regular" scene and either POV or behind the scenes
-Newer videos pretty decent quality, 640x360 4150 kbps WMV was the best I saw
-Zip downloads of photosets, although photosets are pretty limited
-Decent sized collection, 156 models at time of review. A lot of the models that appear here also appear on their sister site: backroomcastingcouch.com. Most models only have 1 scene (with a POV and regular video) some have multiple.
-Better navigation than their sister site, have model index, but no search function.
-Provide model information
-Exclusive content
-No DRM
-Download managers work |
| Cons: |
-Model attractiveness is pretty variable
-Download speeds are not great, best I have seen is 400 KB/s
-Older videos are poor quality, 480x360 1600 kbps MPG was worst I have seen so far
-Camerawork isn't the best
-Photo quality is mediocre
-Price is a little high given the quantity of content
-Too many tattoos
-The guy in the scenes is sort of a douche
-Guy censors his face, which can be distracting in the scenes
-1 update per week
-No real bonus content, some non exclusive steaming sites is all you get. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site primarily because they have a few models I liked from backroomcastingcouch, and I figured this site was bigger so it'd probably also be better. While the site does have some good content, and I like the concept of providing the POV and the regular scene, I found it to be sort of lacking compared with backroomcastingcouch. I can't really put my finger on why, perhaps the models weren't as good (although the two sites have many of the same models), perhaps I am now realizing that the dude is a pretty standard porn douchebag. He seems to get off much more on humiliation than on the other site. Edit: Just realized its a different dude than the other place.
I don't get what is sexy about having the ladies lick his ass, perhaps this is a turn-on for some, but certainly not for me. I plan on editing all that crap out of the videos - and this is not a rare occurence, I'd say almost half of the videos have this type of content.
There is definitely more anal on this site than on their other site, for those that are interested in that kind of stuff. Although I would say it is still not super-common, maybe 15-25% of the videos or so.
There are definitely some videos from this site I will keep, and there are a couple that may become favorites, so I wouldn't say this site is a total waste of money, but it definitely isn't great, and definitely could use some work. Get rid of the dude, if he doesn't want to show his face, find someone that will, or at least teach him some manners. He is starting to sound an aweful lot like those jackasses on the BangBus.
Also, merge these two sites for the same price. There are tons of sites out there that are cheaper with 10x the content, 60% of the price of these two sites combined. If they still have to source material, they really should re-encode the old stuff, that bitrate is just totally unacceptable these days.
Bottom Line, a site worth joining if you see some models you like in the preview. Although don't count on being overly impressed with the material. Certainly not worth joining for more than a month given the infrequent updates. |
|
09-01-10 11:04pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
39
|
VideoBox
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Vast amount of content
-Decent price, one of the few sites I have ever seen where it is cheaper to join by renewing free trial membership than by joining outright, although probably a mistake on their part
-Plenty of variety, although some niches aren't as well represented
-Download managers work
-Download speeds are decent, I averaged 900 KB/s
-Excellent member interaction with reviews and opinions of videos and scenes
-Frequent updates
-Ability to creat custom clips, so you only have to download what you want. |
| Cons: |
-Site navigation is mediocre. For a smaller site, their style might be great, but for a site this large it just doesn't work
-Search function often returns a mixed bag of seemingly random stuff, or doesn't work at all
-Model labels are often incorrect. I can accept that they can't be held responsible for what is on the DVD, but when the members comment that the model name is incorrect, would it be that difficult to fix it?
-Video quality is mediocre in this age, and the file size of newer videos seems quite large given the quality of video
-Site bills directly rather than using a 3rd party biller
-Quality of videos is very hit-or-miss, with most in my opinion being miss. |
| Bottom Line: |
I know there are tons of reviews of this particular site, and I am sure that everyone at PU has been or will be a member eventually. This site used to be one of the best if not the best porn site on the net. However, lately I feel like they are focussing on stupid little user interface issues rather than resolving major issues with the site. How many times have they redesigned the front page? While adding user costum edited clips is interesting, who has the time to dig through that shit?
They should focus more on fixing the problems with the site. Get quality rather than quantity. They already have a huge archive, I don't think many would be dissappointed with 4-5 updates per week if they were good updates. Also, a site this large needs better navigation. The videos can easily be tagged with more info than gonzo and one on one. Tags for tats, breast size (other than large), and body type would be nice. If they don't want to do it, let the users tag the scenes - I'm sure plenty will.
This overall is a good site, and there is a reason it is so popular, but they could certainly take a cue from sites like American Vice that unfortunately failed. Like I said, everyone here should and will become a member here at some point or another, but that doesn't mean videobox doesn't have plenty of issues to resolve. |
|
08-27-10 12:47am
Replies (9)
|
Review
40
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some attractive ladies
-No DRM
-Reasonable sized collection, 128 scenes at the time of review
-Interesting concept, most of the talent plays around pretty well
-Newer stuff is good video quality, 620x360 WMV with 4500 kbps total bitrate
-Download speeds are good if you use a download manager, not so great through browser (300 KB/sec browser, 900 KB/sec with manager)
-Bills through CCBill, didn't have any experience with customer service
-Exclusive content, including some ladies I hadn't seen before anywhere |
| Cons: |
-No real navigation to speak of, just a list of the sets. However, pretty much every model only appears once.
-Site is very very bland, nothing really there except the long list of scenes (unsortable) and a link to friends' sites.
-No photosets at all
-Camerawork can be iffy, since it is mostly filmed with the combination of POV and a tripod, the angles aren't always good - and the guy sometimes gets up to move the camera around (they don't edit this part out)
-Sort of expensive given the amount of content
-Not all download managers work (DTA did, GetRight didn't)
-No bonus content
-The video quality of the older sets is pretty poor - worst I saw was 480x360 1800 kbps.
-Infrequent updates, only one per week
-Oddly the guy blurs out his face with a big blurry Japanese mosaic kind of thing, which can be a bit distracting.
-Model attractiveness is variable, and there are LOTS of tattoos. |
| Bottom Line: |
For what this site is I think it is pretty decent. Its main drawbacks are the older content's quality, the price, and the size of the site. If they merged this site with their sister site (Exploited College Girls) for the same price, the site would defintely become more reasonably priced.
The site has an interesting concept, and there are even a few scenes where the girls decide to back out, which adds some realism I suppose. The concept for the most part is that he tells the girls they can make 1k-5k per day doing private videos for his customers that only the customer will ever see - but of course he has to kick the tires on the ladies first.
Considering the style of site, I didn't find the dude to be that much of a jackass, compared to similar sites like BangBros - where you want to strangle the dude behind the camera.
If you aren't into this kind of setup, you will probably find the site to be lacking, as the camerwork is pretty bad in places, but if you do enjoy this kind of thing it might be worth joining - but just for a month, I don't know why anyone would get their multi-month membership, I don't think you get any bonus sites with that membership either.
Basically a decent site, and he certainly got some attractive ladies - too bad about the tattoos in many cases (what is with that huge fucking teddy bear on Danni Cole's back, shit!). The ladies are mostly American from what I can tell, and not a lot of ethnic diversity here - almost all white. I downloaded about 25 scenes that I plan to keep, amongst those there are about 5 that will be added to my favorites (including the Danni Cole scene, and a Rilee Jensen scene that were both pretty good).
If you are into casting call type scenes, this is definitely a site to consider. Although it could certainly use some improvements, and perhaps a lower price, I'd say it is worth a one month membership. |
|
07-27-10 04:49pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
41
|
Reality Kings
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Vast amount of content
-Regular updates on most of the main sites
-Download managers work, I tried DTA and GetRight
-Decent download speeds, I averaged about 800 KB/sec
-Good price for the amount of content you get
-Excellent variety, pretty much everything is here except hard fetishes
-No DRM
-Zip Downloads of photosets
-MP4 and WMV video quality were good, but not great, both at 768x432 1500 kbps. I thought the MP4 looked better, but neither were super crisp at full screen.
-In-browser video player is pretty good, can seek easily without excessive buffering. |
| Cons: |
-I find there to be a few too many ads, ads when you login, pop-ups
-Website can be glitchy, In The VIP has been disabled for video downloads for almost a week.
-Older content often in three parts still
-Navigation could use some improvement, sorting is a bit odd.
-A bit heavy on the large breasted women for my tastes, but there is plenty for anyone
-They advertise it as HD, but this is only available in streaming format. I would say the streamed HD content is mediocre as far as HD material I have seen (not sure how to check the specs on this). |
| Bottom Line: |
I think this site is pretty excellent, although to me not quite the best out there - as they advertise. There is a wide variety of content, although the primary focus of most of the sites is hardcore material of some sort. If you are looking for solo material, this isn't the place to look.
I do enjoy that the site has model interviews, and other such activities instead of jumping straight to the action. I see this type of thing as a positive, I suppose others might not like this, or consider it a waste of HD space and download time.
To me this site appears to be another site that is focussing a bit too much on quantity over quality. Compared to the last time I was a full-access member here a couple of years ago, I found that a lot of their newer content was not up to the quality standards of previous years.
The other main drawbacks to this site are the sites general practices. Advertising on the homepage that video is in HD, but not allowing people to download said video is a bit iffy in my opinion. Also, excessive advertising, and pop-ups are a bit much. I often get a popup to that fling.com place when I go straight to the member page.
All in all, a pretty decent site if you are into hardcore material. If you are looking for downloadable HD content or solo material I would probably look elsewhere. If the site could improve the quality of some of the recent material as well as improve some of the navigation/site issues, it could in fact be the best porn site on the net. |
|
07-21-10 01:18pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
42
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Decennt video quality, most I downloaded were 1280x720, 5000 kbps, reasonably crisp.
-Okay download speeds, maxed at over 1MB/sec
-Attractive young ladies
-Good bonus content, although the score I am giving here is for this site alone
-Multiple file formats, although best quality only in WMV (flash, wmv, mp4 (for mobile) and 3gp (for mobile, never heard of this)
-Download managers work
-Logins don't time out, no capcha.
-Reasonable price, given bonus content
-Zip downloads of photos, decent quality 1000x1400 typical |
| Cons: |
-Small site, only 35 scenes at time of review
-Slowish updates, about 3 per month for the past month. Although the network updates at more like 10 a month from the looks of things.
-Camerawork can be a bit sketchy
-Navigation of the site and network are still pretty bad, although it is improving. The seem to have fixed some of the model name problems they used to have.
-Adds for other sites are throughout, kind of annoying.
-There are some navigation glitches (adds covering up thumbs and such). |
| Bottom Line: |
Joined this site, as I guess it was added after the last time I was a member of this network of sites (teensexmania, teenstarsonly, atmovs, etc.). I wasn't sure if this site was a part of the 19.95 deal for joining teensexmania as it is not listed as a bonus, so joined it directly - although it probably is included, I didn't feel like taking the chance.
The ladies are attractive, and the theme of the site is loosly teacher based, although I'd say it is primarily a gonzo site. All of the models listed do hardcore material, with about half doing anal. The scenes are for the most part pretty good, on par or better than most of these newbie euro sites.
If you haven't been a member of this network of sites, it is definitely worth joining, although I'd probably join through teensexmania and get the discount, if this site isn't one of the bonus sites you get, it isn't much of a loss. If you have been a member of this network before, I wouldn't say this site is reason enough to join.
Assuming this site is part of the network, see my review of teensexmania for my opinions on the network as a whole, although I wrote that 6 months ago, the info still applies.
I joined this site primarily cause I was bored, hadn't joined a site in a while and they have a few models I liked so I figured what the hell.
The site itself is pretty good, and I still think the network is great. I wish they would spend a little more time fixing some of the navigation issues (adding search, indexing the models, etc.), especially since the network is getting pretty large, 736 scenes at the time of this review.
Billed through segpay (I find to be the most suspect of the billers - I used a card on one of their sites and somehow the card number was stolen, I just sort of assumed it is because of them, but can't be sure) - used a virtual card this time...
Definitely worth joining if you are a fan of natural, thin, euro ladies - especially if you haven't joined the network before. However, if you are a fan of plots, large breasted women, or pictures, you are best served looking elsewhere. Also, if your internet connection isn't very good, you could certainly get frustrated, the typical scene on the network is between 500 MB and 1 GB. |
|
07-02-10 10:05pm
Replies (0)
|
Rating
43
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
88.0
|
No Review.
|
06-29-10 12:28am
|
Review
44
|
I Fucked Her Finally
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Attractive eastern euro women
-Download managers work, I haven't experienced any idle time-outs
-Good download speeds, I've been getting over 1 MB/sec avg.
-Decent sized site when you include the "bonus" sites, although most of the content can be accessed any of main the sites. 348 total models, it is difficult to tell how many scenes, between 1-6 scenes per model from what I have seen.
-Zip downloads of photosets, although this is primarily a video site
-Small or no watermarks
-I didn't see any obvious fake breasts, yay!
-Videos can be downloaded in parts (many many parts, two sizes) or a single file (only one size available)
-Most of their content appears exclusive, or at least I haven't seen it anywhere. |
| Cons: |
-Mediocre video quality on newer material, 832x468, 2300 kbps high end. Worst I downloaded was 520x416 1400 kbps. None of the videos are very crisp
-Poor camerawork is common
-Photo quality is poor to mediocre, 800x1200. Some scenes appear to be screenshot only.
-A bit pricy
-Poor navigation, although it has improved over the last time I joined this network. There is a model list that can be sorted by name/date/rating but no search function
-There were a few dead links
-Some sites no longer updating
-WMV and streaming are the only formats available |
| Bottom Line: |
Rather than try to review all the sites on this network, I will just post this and hope most of the people find it. Hopefully in the future this network will establish a main site ala 21sextury or DDF - certainly would make reviews easier.
This network of sites has definitely improved over the last time I was a member, the navigation is significantly better (it has gone from god-aweful to poor). Perhaps worth considering if you are into young eastern euro models.
There are 28 bonus sites that are included with this site. some of which are:
Trickyoldteacher (HC, old/young); Spoiledvirgins (HC); 18virginsex (HC); Amourbabes (Solo); youngpornhomevideo (Amateur); Drilledmouths (BJ); younglesbiansportal; creampiedsweeties (HC); Dirtyass2mouth (anal)
Some of the bonus sites appear to be original content, others clearly are not. The only sites that appear to be currently updating are 18virginsex, trickyoldteacher, ifuckedherfinally, and spoiledvirgins.
As I said earlier they have integrated most of their content onto a single site (accesesible from the models tab on any of their sites), so you no longer have to keep browsing all the bonus sites. I am not entirely sure that all of their content is listed under the models list.
The content itself on the network is pretty variable, but I would say most of it is gonzo-style content. Some of the sites try to add some plot to the scenes, although since few are in english, it is pretty pointless (for me).
Didn't have any experience with customer service, billed through Epoch for me, no forum or anything of that nature, although you can add feedback on the sets (and rate them).
If you are into young natural women, this site might be one to consider. Hopefully they continue to improve - especially in the navigation/video quality/camerawork departments. They certainly find some attractive women, if only they could present them a little better. |
|
05-12-10 07:43pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
45
|
Smack My Bitch
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Very attractive eastern-euro women
-Decent variety, mostly hardcore content but there is some solo content and a little bit of lesbian
-Good video quality, 1280x720 4500 kbps high end, 1152x648 4000kbps was the worst I saw.
-Zip downloads of photosets (when there is a photoset available)
-Download managers work, although the site doesn't let you stay logged in for long so both the ones I tried timed out after an hour or so.
-Small watermark on videos and photos
-Has a forum, but it is not active.
-Photo quality is good when photosets are available, 2600x1700
-I don't know that the content is exclusive, but I haven't seen it anywhere else (although curiously I have seen some of the thumbnails used for model photos elsewhere)
-Updates about 2-3 times per week
-No DRM |
| Cons: |
-Download speeds are inconsistent, often poor. 150 KB/s was the worst I saw, 800 KB/s was the best.
-No bonus content
-Price a bit high for this sized site these days
-Camera work is mediocre
-Navigation isn't very good, no search function
-Smallish site, 130 models, 226 total scenes at time of review
-Most scenes are video only. Some have actual photosets, most only have screencaps.
-Pretty much a gonzo site
-Video only available in one size and one format (wmv) |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is pretty good if you are into eastern euro women, particularly doing hardcore scenes. However there is a fair amount of anal and both anal and vaginal gaping action, which I'm not too fond of.
I didn't have any experience with customer service, so can't comment on that. Didn't post in the forum as it appeared dead. Billing for me was through Epoch.
The site design is pretty simple, there are five tabs: Home, Models, Scenes, Favorites, Forum. Models are browsed on one page in alphabetical order only. Logins time out relatively quickly, although not as bad as some sites.
The models are definitely attractive, many of the typical younger eastern-euro models you see around these days. There are definitely some scenes worth keeping if you are into young athletic ladies.
If the site were slightly larger and fixed some of their download/navigation issues I would probably more highly recommend it. At their current price with no bonus sites, I think you can get much better value from other teen sites, and there are certainly plenty of other options.
Probably worth joining if you are into a specific model, there are some good Barbariska, Lukava, and Sasha Rose scenes here as well as some other models I had never seen before. However, if you are on a tight porn budget, not too into hardcore/anal, or a photo fan this probably isn't the best site for you. |
|
05-06-10 09:26pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
46
|
Exclusive Teen Porn
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Attractive euro models
-Good video quality, 1280x720 10000 kbps, pretty crisp
-Decent selection of bonus sites, although some are only available as loyalty sites
-Photo quality okay, 1024x760 typically
-Zip downloads available
-Decent download speeds, 1 MB/sec
-Download managers work |
| Cons: |
-Smallish collection, 100 or so videos and 114 photo sets at the time of this review
-Very poor navigation, no real search function, most video sets dont even provide a model name.
-Camerawork isn't very good in most videos
-Models don't always seem very interested
-A bit too "gonzo" for me
-Expensive for what you get
-While you get access to several bonus sites - many are either no longer updating or not exclusive |
| Bottom Line: |
I'd say this site is acceptable, if it were a bit cheaper I might recommend it a little more highly. There are some good videos on this site that I will definitely keep, but the many negative issues with the site are quite a drawback.
When I joined you get bonus access to the following sites:
HDteensvideo (144 video sets, 68 photo sets)
bestfuckedteens (36 video sets, 219 phot sets)
pearlteens.com (13 video sets, 85 photo sets) - don't think exclusive
teensamateurvideo (129 video sets, 289 photo sets)
fucking-young (130 videos - most in parts only, 1000+ photo sets) - not exclusive
And several other pretty much worthless non-exclusive sites.
The navigation of all of these sites is pretty much the same, you click on photos or vidoes and bring up a list. Some are a bit more evolved, but not much. I didn't see a model index on any of the sites, or a search function. Some videos are given stupid names, but many don't even have model names.
Given the size of the sites, I am not sure why they have "loyalty" sites, as I doubt anyone ever stays around long enough to become a member, or at least they shouldn't. Especially since you don't appear to be given any kind of discount for being "loyal" and you only get like one extra site a month.
Bottom line, even though the video quality is pretty good, and there are some attractive models to be found, I'd probably look elsewhere unless there is a specific model you see in the preview that you really like. |
|
04-21-10 07:34pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
47
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Great price with the PU discount
-No DRM
-Download managers work
-Newer videos are full HD, 1280x720 3000 kbps was the best of what I downloaded. Pretty crisp even though the bitrate is kind of low for HD
-Most videos are "DVD resolution" 640x480 1500 kbps, pretty crisp even at this resolution although the older the material the worse it gets.
-Scenes for the most part have a story, this is a plus for me, some might find it a negative since often only 50% of the scene involves sex.
-Can download DVD in full for most movies
-Pretty decent sized collection, over 400 DVDs and 3000 photosets (although some of the photsets I looked at were empty)
-Photo quality is okay, most is 600x900
-zip downloads of the photosets |
| Cons: |
-Inconsitent download speads, rarely faster than 600 kb/sec
-Site can be slow to load
-Odd navigation
-A bit too focussed on large breasted women for my tastes, but there is a reasonable variety
-Some videos not downloadable, although I would say most I tried were
-Behind the scenes stuff is streaming only
-While they have a lot of stars, the vast majority only have a couple of scenes with a select few having 10 or more scenes.
-mp4 is the only available download format
-Not much in the way of photos (even though they have 3000 sets), many girls don't have any listed and most are the same scenes as the videos
-Infrequent updates, only about 1 DVD a week and a couple of photo sets a week since I've been a member |
| Bottom Line: |
While one might think my score is a bit high given all the cons, I think for the PU discount price, this site is definitely worth joining. It surely has its share of problems, but clearly it is a work in progress - and actually a lot better than I thought it would be given the other reviews I read here.
The site certainly has navigation issues. There is a search function available, but it is just a text search. Browsing by model can get a bit frustrating, as the model page loads a streaming movie of the most recent video by that model at the top, and loads all the DVDs, Movies, Galleries, and Promotional shoots available at the bottom, but you have to click through this list which can get annoying if the star has a ton of available content (like Kaylani Lei). One other nuisance is sometimes if you go straight to a scene no download option is available, but there is one at the page for that DVD - unfortunately the DVD download tab just lists the downloadable scenes by number so you have to remember which scene you are downloading.
One good part of the nagivation is that every scene lists a good bit of information tagged to each scene: who is in it, what action is involved, costume, positions, type of tits (natural/fake), location, body details (tats, piercings, shaved, etc.) and cumshot location. Most of these tags are clickable, however when you click them it just brings up a list of all the DVDs (not scenes) that have this tag, so clicking "natural" tits is pretty useless. Interesting concept though, if implemented a little better it could be very useful.
I didn't have any experience with customer service, so can't comment on that, the biller was CCBill for me.
Overall I'd say this site is pretty good, especially if you are a fan of any of the Wicked girls, as there is a good bit of content for all of them, the main reason I joined was price and their vast collection of Kaylani Lei videos - and the price. I found the vast majority of the content on their site to be downloadable, and not streaming only - although I am not sure how much of their archive is actually on the site. The oldest movie I saw was from 1991 (Maddams Family) and it was downloadable - although I didn't download it, so I can't comment on quality. There are 436 DVDs listed on the site at the time of this review.
Even though the site has its flaws, and far too many fake breasts, I'd still say it is worth joining for a month. I'm sure almost any user could find some content they liked that would make it worth the small price to join. However, due to the infrequent updates, I doubt it is worth being a member for more than a month. |
|
04-10-10 05:38pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
48
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Very attractive, mostly euro models
-Good video quality 720x480 2500 kbps on most older material, 1024x576 4000 kbps on newer stuff
-No DRM
-Videos downloadable in parts or full scene
-Good mix of content: hardcore, "midcore", some lesbian, and some softcore
-Download managers work (at least for videos)
-Reasonably priced
-Okay photo quality, newer stuff is 1350x900
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Decent sized site, about 400 models
-Site seems primarily focused on videos now
-I think most content is exclusive
-Good download speeds, maxed my 7Mbps connection when using a download manager |
| Cons: |
-No bonus content
-Poor navigation, although the site says it is version 2.0, I don't see any significant improvements from a few years ago
-No search function
-No forum, model information, or anything of that nature
-When you go to cancel you are given links to Epoch and CCbill, however I was billed through DHD media, and a link is not provided.
-Inconsitent updates, don't appear to be on a schedule, seems like 2 videos and 2 photo sets per week
-Couldn't get download managers to work for zipped photosets (although this might just be me, as I've had this problem elsewhere)
-Videos and photos are watermarked, although not terribly annoying |
| Bottom Line: |
This site used to be one of my favorites, as it had great content from models like Belicia, Sonia Red, and Eufrat when they were younger.
However, the newer content certainly is not nearly as high quality (from model attractiveness perspective) as the older stuff in my opinion.
This day in age, most people expect some type of search function. Although they do have a model list, that is pretty much it as far as useful navigation tools. The Most Popular tab is somewhat useful, although most of the Most Popular material is older.
This site could definitely use a re-design, and work on getting models and content that meets the quality of their older material.
I didn't have any experience with customer service, although I would assume it would be pretty much the same as Twisty's.
This site is definitely worth joining if you have never been a member, however if you have been a member recently, it is probably not the best use of your money. |
|
03-30-10 07:42pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
49
|
Real Teenie GFs
(0)
52.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Decent Download speeds
-Download managers work
-Some of the girls are attractive |
| Cons: |
-Small collection, some of which appears to be from another site - jailbaitvideos - and these videos are particularly sketchy as some of the girls look aweful young (although they don't have nudity they are just dancing around)
-Bonus sites are equally crappy or streaming only
-Trial give you access to practically nothing, parts of 4 scenes that aren't downloadable
-Expensive
-Crazy false advertising, I saw very few of the girls shown on the home page in the site
-What I consider unethical site behavior, see me comment
-No pictures except screen caps of videos, although it would appear from the front page that there are many pictures
-Video quality is mediocre to poor (1500 kbps typical) |
| Bottom Line: |
I thought this site sounded sort of interesting, however it proved to be pretty crappy and very misleading both in price and content. I strongly discourage anyone from joining this site. I tried to come up with some other pros, but I must admit I couldn't really think of any.
Very sketchy site, I recommend you look elsewhere. |
|
02-25-10 04:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
50
|
Viv Thomas Video
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Good sized collection - over 650 models
-Models are quite attractive, most of the popular euro models area available here
-Excellent download speeds (1.5 MB/sec)
-Download managers work
-Photosets downloadable in zips
-Video quality pretty good: 640x480, 2084 kbps
-Good variety of content
-Good camerawork on photography and videos
-Photo quality is acceptable, but not the best - newer stuff is 1280, older stuff worse |
| Cons: |
-Orginization could use some improvement. Not really sure what the purpose of listing the DVDs is, as all the scenes I saw on the DVDs were listed under the video section of that model anyways. A search function would be nice.
-I found some of the sets to be a bit heavy on the makeup, which is not really my thing - I prefer the more natural look
-Could improve photo and video quality
-No bonus sites
-A little pricy |
| Bottom Line: |
A pretty good site, definitely better than most. Certainly worth joining, even if like me, you aren't a fan of overly madeup girls as there are still plenty of good scenes.
The content is mostly solo and lesbian, in the video section there are:
50 Boy/Girl scenes
210 Solo scenes
440 Girl/Girl scenes
(The sort function doesn't work great, so these totals might be a bit off)
Although the boy/girl scenes they have are pretty good, if your main search is for boy/girl I might look elsewhere.
As Exotics has said many times, and I agree, this site has some of the best lesbian content on the net.
In summary, pretty much a top tier site that most people would probably find worth joining. If they improved video quality and picture quality a bit this site would probably be even higher on my list. If you are a fan of hot euro models, and especially lesbian content, you won't be disappointed here. |
|
02-23-10 03:50pm
Replies (0)
|
|
