| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Shemale Strokers
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-good quality camera work
-shoots end in a cumshot 99 percent of the time
-good download speeds
-decent price $24.95
-great looking models |
| Cons: |
-needs a new site layout
-pics sets are small just stills from the video
-newer wmv video clips dont seem to fast foward
-not much bonus content |
| Bottom Line: |
i have been a member of shemalestrokers.com a long time now and will continue to be for a long time.First off this site is more of a solo site it does have some hardcore stuff but not alot.Now the videos on the site are great.Sammy really takes pride with the camera in his hand he gets good angles he does nt go overboard with the closeups like some sites do and always captures a good cumshot.Just about all the scenes end in a cumshot which is extremely important to us shemale fans.Now im looking at my collection and the dimensons and bitrates of the wmv scenes can vary ranging from 640X480 to about 900x506 as one of my scenes is.The bitrates range to from 1200K up but generally the quality is very good with some of the older scenes being average,but sammy is making a effort to reformat these scenes which is good to see.There is one big problem with the newer wmv videos some of them can not be fast fowarded for some reason now i have this problem some people said in the forum its due to having a old computer but im not sure and im not the only person with this probem its a ongoing issue thats been mentioned countless times,as a result i use the quicktime clips but im fine with them there quality is good .Now im not sure of the dimensions or bitrates of the quicktime clips but they are great looking and can be viewed and full screen nicely.One thing i like about the video work is its never the same sammy always keeps in interesting sometimes you get a short interview with the girl telling us about herself,you get models talking dirty to the camera which is a real turn on theres dildo work with a neat dildo seat which i like.The cumshots are always taken in different ways sometimes the girls cum on spoons,cups or plates and lick it off or even cum on there own faces its aways getting mixed up,its simply not a repeat formula that you get with some sites.The pic sets are kinda small usually about 50 or so and pics are just stills taken for the videos but they are good quality there is a zip file option to which is good.The site updates twice a week which means 2 new girls a week with a random reformated older clip appearing whenever.This may be a small update compared to other sites but the quality of the camera work more than makes up for this im happy with there update policy.So all in all shemalestrokers is a solid site the video work is excellent(with some issues that need to be adressed)all scenes end with cumshots which is important to us shemale fans it has a big model data base that will keep new members busy and hard.I recommend this site to anyone its a gem so check it out |
|
05-20-09 01:26am
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
Shemale Yum
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-some models that are exclusive to shemaleyum.com
-great new layout which is very user freindly
-regluar updates each week
-a huge model data base
***camera work has improved dramatically over the last few months i have changed the review score accordingly*** |
| Cons: |
-site is expensive
-some poor camera work
-large updates which focus on quantity over quality
-lack of cumshots |
| Bottom Line: |
shemale yum has been around a long time had has brought us some great girls over the years.there data base is huge which will keep you busy for months if you new to the site.first off most the content is solo so dont expect a huge ammount of hardcore content. the pics sets are good quality and have zip downloads.the videos on the other hand vary alot most of the new videos are (640x480)with varying bitrates there is also a smaller option (320x240)which is nt great.the more older vids are rather average which can be expected as was technology at the time alot seem to be realplayer,divx format.on the whole the new videos are good quality.the camera work can also very depending on the camera man some clips seem to a simply strip tease leading onto the model playing with herself,others the camera man can get invovled and have a play himself.now new models on the site will generally have one shoot seperated into two or three updates which i think is pretty appauling more often that not you have to wait months to see a models cumshot which is exteremly important to a shemale fan like myself so dont expect to see a cumshot each time a girl is updated or shot for the first time.on the whole shemaleyum.com is a good site yes it is expensive and it has its downfalls but no and a i repeat no other website can delivery the models shemaleyum.com does which is a big plus |
|
05-12-09 08:50pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
3
|
Frank's TGirl World
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-good pic sets zip formats
-franks shoot the most beautiful models he can find
-link to a personals page(not sure now update it is)
-good download speeds
-updates come every week |
| Cons: |
-poor site layout
-a little pricey
-frank is always touching and sucking the models
-camera work is more often bad than good |
| Bottom Line: |
i have been a on and off member of franks-tgirlworld.com for a while now and each time i come back i expect the site to be better at its not.First off the possitves about the sites are the models he does nt bother with the less attractive girls around he goes for the best looking ones which is a real bonus.Theres a link to a personally page which can be handy if you plan to travel but im not sure how up to date it is.Now the pic sets on the site are great most can be downloaded in zip formats with two options (1280x960 or 1024x768)the old sets dont have zip files which can be a nightmare getting a complete set.The ugly things about the site are the layout its outdated and needs a update as soon as possible.The videos are a major let down on this site in terms of quality and camera work by frank,first off frank cant keep his hands and other parts off the models which can lead to some pretty bad angles if you into seeing that this might be the site for you but it was a real turn off for me i did nt really want to see fanks hands and other parts of his body in the videos consistanly.Also the quality is all over the show.videos can range in size from 16 mb(older) clips to over 600 mb with newer clips.the older videos in the divx format are of average quality but the newer wmv are not really what they should be in this day at age.The large wmv files are shot at 1280X760 dimensions but most are let down by a fisheye lens in the carema which frank used for a long period of time that basically makes alot of the clips unwatchable it distords the image badly.He has since discontinued this and gone back to a normal lens but for some reason the videos can not be viewed in full screen mode like most other sites so your left with a black box around the outside of the video which can be a real let down im not sure why this is im not a video expert.The sound in some videos is terrible to i noticed this issue when viewing morgan baileys and other videos where the model is talking but you cant hear anything which is another let down.Even with a normal camrera lens and shooting in 1280x760 deminsions the video quality should be better than it is.All in all franks-tgirlworld.com is a average site if you like pics sets then this site will appeal to you but if your after professional video work with the quality to boot then you might be let down as i was. |
|
05-15-09 06:10pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
4
|
Shemale Japan
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-all models are from japan
-good site speed
-i honestly cant think of any more pros about the site |
| Cons: |
-terrible video work(thats still terrible now)
-high site price
-not many extras
-does nt seem to be any plans to properly train the camera man |
| Bottom Line: |
i have joined this stie twice first off i was not impressed at all now the second time i can say the site has improved but not by much im still rather dissappointed .I honestly struggled to find two positive things about the site.One of the positives was all the models are from japan and some of the girls are very cute.One girl called marin is a star but is completely ruined by what i deem a terrible camera man i will explain later.first off the pic sets are decent im not sure what the dimensions are but they are clear and well presented.Now the video work on the site is what i was really interested in and its aweful in my opinion first off as stated in a early review a video of a model seemed to be broken into 2 to 3 updates,first video was usually a strip second was a masterbation scene or a camera man forgeting his job and getting a blowjob which i gather most people did nt want to see then the third was a cumshot.this was true and a fair bit of the older videos were done on this policy.Now the camera man invovled has seemed to be limited which is good but as for some videos just being a simple strip tease this has nt stop for example a recent new video i downloaded of a girl called yuna(updated 11th of june)is nothing more than a striptease the video goes for 11.49 mins and you dont see this girls cock until 7 mins 23 i personally think this is unacceptable to paying members.Now theres a few videos like this which is annoying ITS A PORN SITE im sure most members dont wantto see 6 to 7 mins of a fully clothed girl.I also found personally most the videos to be rather boring alot of the models dont seem to be excited nor was there much erotic feeling to alot of the videos.The site does have some great moments like a yuna cumshot explosion cum flys for metres but there far and few between I personally think the site would be much better with a new professional camera man but thats just me.As for video quality i have no complaints there wmv format and have two options 320x240 or 640x480.In closing i think the site has alot of imporving to do.Maybe they should take a leaf out of lb-69.com book on now to construct quality professional video work cos its needed badly.Now i may get a blasting for this rather negitive review but its my review and this is the way i feel about the site some people might disagree but i stick by all what i have said here |
|
06-19-09 02:19am
Replies (1)
|
Review
5
|
Bob's TGirls
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-great looking models from over the globe
-great new easy to use layout
-active forum
-great pee scene
-good pic sets
-pic set update each day |
| Cons: |
-seems to be a lack of focus on videos
-not much videos to download (lack of high quality)
-updates seem a little slow with the videos
-cant seem to use resume download fuction on site(might just be me)
-some great looking models dont have video
-site speed was a little slower than most for me
-not worth the 29.95 a month |
| Bottom Line: |
first off bobstgirls.com was in a major need of a layout update and the new layout is great the site is very easy to find your way around,it even has a favourites page where you can add your favourite models which is a nice feature.Now this site may be a decent site if your into pic sets they seem to add a new pic set each day which is great.All the pic sets can be downloaded in zip files im not sure of the dimensions but they look fine.Now if your into videos like i am then this site is a real let down there seems to be a real lack of focus on the videos.After browsing my hard drive and looking my video folder there was only roughly 7 gig of videos i downloaded off the site which is nt a lot at all ,there may be a more than this on the site but i would not imagine it would be much more, now of that 7 gig i would say under half of that would be quality video work in terms of resoultion.The videos can range from about 352x240 (some might be lower) to hd quality videos.only the newer content is up to todays standards with a bulk of the videos being of lower quality and not reallypleasing on the eye when compared to other sites.One very annoying thing about the site is seeing a great looking model with say 6 to 7 pic sets and no videos at all this really does need to be addressed.One bonus about the videos is alot of the girls have a pee scene which is great for pee lovers but theres just not enough videos here to keep people hooked.Theres also over 460 girls if my maths is correct which is a nice selection.so on the whole bobstgirls.com is decent site if your into pics or a below average site if your into videos i would not recommend this site to anyone who wants alot of video content to download.I get the feeling that theirs a part time type approach by bob on the site he does nt seem to want to make this site into a quality site that can rival the other big shemale sites out there which is a shame. |
|
12-06-09 07:24pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
6
|
Tranny Filth
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
nothing |
| Cons: |
-THIS IS A SCAM SITE WHICH USES CLIPS FROM OTHER
SITES AND MOST THE BRAZILIAN SHEMALES DO NOT HAVE MOVIES WHICH IS NOT STATED IN THE TOUR
-there is not 300 scenes as stated my count was 82
-extremely overpriced
_there is no weratedshemales sites stated in the tour
-its states there is hundreds of dvds there is nt one to be viewed |
| Bottom Line: |
this site is a complete scam im not new to the shemale scene and right from the get go i noticed most of the ladyboy clips are simply taken from lb-69.com so the content is not new.Almost all of the brazilian girls on the shemalejuice site have no videos which is stated in the tour that they have scenes which would indicate its a movie.they also say in the tour there is over 300 scenes which is complete rubbish they have 82 full clips.this is the first shemale site i have come across thats been a complete joke i advise anyone to stay away from it.This review got 50 because i cant review a site lower than 50 if i could i would have given it about 5 |
|
09-26-10 06:55pm
Replies (3)
|
