Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : dracken (0)  

Feedback:   All (678)  |   Reviews (143)  |   Comments (107)  |   Replies (428)

Other:   Replies Received (318)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 126-150 of 155 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
126
Visit Teen Mega World

Teen Mega World
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 27 sites, 832 models, 3034 videos and daily updates.
- For the most part videos come in 3 sizes (WMV high definition(1280x720), FLV medium (700x400) and mobile device ready (usually mp4 @ 480x240), although some scenes have specific apple format)
- All scenes come with zipped photo archives (for the most part image quality is high at 1400x960)
- Easy navigation and while things are a bit basic it's easy to find a particular niche or a particular model.
- Good download speeds while using a download manager (I am located in the US Midwest , not sure how that affected things but I had no issues with time-outs, network errors and everything went down fast)
- There is a forum feature where admins actually answer questions, it's not very heavily used but if you have feedback, questions or issues I have seen them answer within a few hours
- I believe the site is entirely eastern European girls with a strong focus on Russian girls. A lot of very beautiful girls some well know, some less so.
Cons: - The main issue with the network is lack of consistency, for example some scenes have a quick intro with subtitles, others are just a Russian intro with no translation. Some older scenes use a different streaming model and some scenes are MKV format, some are FLV some are WMV. It's to be expected for a network that's been around for such a long time and has as much content as this one, but sometimes it makes it hard to know what you'll get with each scene.
- As almost every eastern European site out there each video saves as a random name ( try to remember what scene 20.setflash.flv is)
- Navigation while functional is a bit basic and we only have a handful of categories to search by, it would also be nice to see a preview of the scene when hovering over the thumbnail (like 21sextury does)
- The light and camerawork could be a bit improved as it feels somewhat basic and can be pretty different from scene to scene (some have a lot of close-ups some are mostly zoomed out shots)
Bottom Line: If I remember correctly this network was one of the first sites I ever joined, back in 2008-2009 and since then I come back to it every so often because of the high quality of the girls here. No matter when I join I always find a bunch of videos I'm happy to add to my collection.

They have numerous very hot girls and while they are not named the same way other sites label them, they have most of the big names as well as several girls I have not seen many other places. (Hennessy is Sveta here in some very hot anal action, Monica is Marta B. Sarah is Benta and so on)

The scenes range from solo masturbation scenes (on beauty angels) to lesbian (spread around the multiple networks, but around 100 scenes or so total) to anal and double penetration. A lot of the girls, wear cute outfits with a decent amount of stockings and different looking skirts and tops. Overall there isn't a lot of make-up and airbrushing leaving the girls looking pretty natural and adorable.

One interesting aspect to me is that the shots on TeenMegaWorld feel a lot more natural and innocent, almost home made/ amateur-ish, which for me makes them a million time more interesting, but it really depends what you're looking for.

A lot of the scenes have pretty basic lighting and there is a nice mix of far shots as well as close-ups, but they don't feel over produced.

Another nice aspect is that most of the girls have multiple shots so you can find them in both solo action as well as anal sex. Overall I'd say the network has a nice mix of the action giving you a good range (but don't go in expecting all anal or all solo stripping shots)

As mentioned above some of the minor complaints I have about the network are mostly related to consistency, I would like the beauty angels site to be all solo action as opposed to the occasional hardcore sex scene. I know I can filter by the solo tag, but why have a different network if the action is the same as teen mania or fuck studies? Also I'd like to see all lesbian scenes have their own site and maybe some new updates for some older sites, which seem dead at this point.

I would also like all scenes to be in the same encoding and same resolution and save with the model's name instead of the cryptic 11.setflash (interestingly enough older scenes do save with the model's name and the video resolution, not sure what changed in the internal structure of the site)

But these are small complaints which barely affect the enjoyment of the action which is great. If you're looking for natural looking girls in both softcore and anal action this network is probably one of the best sites you can join. I mentioned their main competition (21sextury) but that network feels a lot more geared towards mainstream looking pornstars with a lot of make-up and giant boobs. Teen mega world is perfect for anyone looking for hot, innocent looking teens in hardcore scenes and at this point it's one of the few Eastern European networks still updating daily with quality content.

04-14-13  02:58pm

Replies (6)
Review
127
Visit Teen Mega World

Teen Mega World
(0)

80.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Updated: 08-03-09  07:43am  (Update History)
Reason: Added pors and cons and changed grade after visiting the site again
Pros: -NOT a scam of any kind. The girls are all legal and the subscribing/unsubscribing part worked just fine
-A lot of content spread over many different sites. I am not a member anymore but I remember around 1500+ video scenes from all the sites and just as many photosets.
-young, cute looking girls doing hardcore
-good download speeds and the material seemed exclusive
-updates pretty regularly on the main sites (teensexmovs, teen sex mania gagn gape and the lesbian one)
-decent price for the amount of content offered
Cons: -just sex, no story, no interviews with the models. Nothing but hardcore sex with girls that sometimes look confused. for some it is their first time on camera and some emotions are natural but some (not very many) girls looked completely out of it.
-rather hard to navigate (have to enter each site manually, hard to search for a certain model)
-some videos in my experience had bad quality as in bad angles or poor lighting. Mostly the older ones.
Bottom Line: It's a good deal if you like hardcore teens. Most of the girls are awesome (you can judge how hot they are from the preview area), but the camera work is lacking quite often, also one of their male models is so ugly I could not watch the videos where he appears (but this is very subjective)

Overall I'd recommend it as I found at least ten girls that in my opinion are incredible. I just wish they had some info, maybe an interview in order to get to know them better.

08-01-09  10:13am

Replies (6)
Review
128
Visit Teen Models

Teen Models
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -180 HD videos in the main section of the site with about 400 other videos (non-exclusive) as a bonus. The videos are available as 1080p at 1920x1080, 720p at 1280x720 and a Standard Definition format at 640x360.

- about 300 photo galleries available in several sizes 3000px quality being the best. Zipped archives also available.

- very pretty European (hungarian, russian and other eastern european countries) and one or two american girls.

- a lot of variation, from anal insertions to lesbian and play with oneself.

- very fast servers and easy navigation. Also the search function works very well :)

- some of the bonus sites include the whole HD porn pass network as well as cable guy sex...

- very nice page detailing all the updates and even offering a trailer for most videos.
Cons: - one of my biggest sources of sadness was that they don't have a video for every photo gallery and the other way around. I would say that the photos are much better than the videos actually...

- the videos are rather short mostly clocking in at under 20 minutes...which is not bad but considering you only have around 200 exclusive shots, not a lot of actual video time...

- there are no interviews or other direct contact with the models in the videos. Music plays, models dance and masturbate or have lesbian sex...lacks a bit of personal touch.

- zipped files and movies are named critically 2472424.zip...makes it hard to figure out what exactly is what when you have 100 new downloads...

- customer support was nice about a problem I had streaming, but although I got it to work the streaming is rather slow...not a big issue ad I prefer downloading movies anyhow, but...
Bottom Line: This site is a must for anyone who likes teen models and especially if you don't care about male models being present (only penis I've seen was in the bonus section which are non-exclusive videos). The videos and photos are gorgeous and the girls look wonderful as they fist each other. There are also some very interesting insertions on this site including a banana and a baseball bat.

However if you are a video fanatic I am not sure this is the best site. Despite amazing HD video quality most videos feel a bit generic, there are no interviews with the girls like over at nubiles. Also there aren't any scenes where the girls talk...

Which brings me to my second disappointment, there isn't a very strong connection to the models. Places like Nubiles offer you bios and other neat stuff so you cna get to know the model. Teenmodels only delivers galleries and videos, great ones but very little personal connection IMO.

Now, this doesn't mean the site doesn't compete with the likes of FTV or Teen Dreams... in fact if you're looking for eastern European models this might be one of the best places for them. Just be warned that this site isn't as focused on the models personality.

Another slightly annoying problem was that all videos were named the same and sometimes when I had a very long download list some videos skipped due to some sort of error. It took forever to figure out which ones...I don't know if the error (403 error) was due to me or them...but it was annoying.

Either way, this site is awesome for anyone who loved HD porn and combined with the whole HD porn pass it's a deal. I wholeheartedly recommend buying a month and checking it out. I for one will probably not renew, but that is due to a subjective choice not necessarily a lack on the part of the site.

10-17-09  05:00pm

Replies (2)
Review
129
Visit Teen Slam

Teen Slam
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -39 scenes in rather poor quality 452x300 . Most of which don't have full download options (available only as clips) On a few of the more recent videos WMV and MPG are offered. I'd have preferred MP4 but that's just me...

- each scene has a few screen caps at around 480px × 640px. No zipped archive and not really worth saving IMO. The images are blurry and don't even come close to the quality available in many other places. Teen Dreams comes to mind as a good place for teen hardcore photos.

- a lot of new faces (I didn't really recognize any of the models and I browse most of the young adult networks) and mostly relatively cute girls. Some act more shy than others and some are cutter than others, with a lot of girls I didn't care for (but that's subjective). All and all a decent mix.

- some of the more recent videos have trailers.

- access to the whole meat members network which has around 54 sites and hundreds of scenes. The site is very well integrated in the network.
Cons: - last video is from 06.2009 but before that the last video is from 2007. A huge gap....also I am not sure if further updates will be available

- no way to search only inside the site. Say if you want to see anal within the Teen Slam site.

- no model pages

- streaming claims it requires windows media player 11 I had it installed and firefox still wouldn't stream. Didn't have this problem elsewhere.

- download speeds aren't the best I've ever seen. It capped at around 50-70kb.
Bottom Line: All and all this site has/had potential. There are some really cute girls in here, although they can be a bit hard to find among the less good looking ones, a better preview system would have worked wonders. Most previews are just a shot of the girl with a penis in her mouth, the penis obscuring half the image due to the angle.

Anyhow, the main problem is not bad previews but the fact that this site was probably abandoned in late 2007, for a while updates were regular (back in 2007), then they stop. Only to have that last video from 2009...does this mean that the updates will start back up? maybe, maybe not.

By 2007 standards the site is good, but compared to other networks, it lacks. When places like Facial Abuse offer HD videos and this place has mostly scenes cut up in clips of 1 minute each there isn't really any fair compassion.
When sites offer high def photos and Teen Slam tries to compete by offering screen caps...nope, won't do.

Bottom line. A lot of potential, a decent amount of cute teens doing hardcore, not enough dedication by the webmaster. The site is mediocre and if there is something else in the Meat Members network that you like consider this site as well, but Teen Slam is not a deal maker or breaker.

(Gave it 70 because I really liked one or two of their models, but if it weren't for that, this site is not worth it.)

However this site will also get you access to the whole Meat Members network which boasts 57 Sites
29123 scenes, 8000 Bonus DVD's and 374864 Photos!

Now keep in mind that the bonus DVD's are only for streaming and that some of the scenes are actually low quality stuff that you will probably not be interested in. However, this is not a bad deal, especially if you're into rough sex with a lot of anal. The whole network seems to slowly move in that direction.

10-30-09  03:11pm

Replies (0)
Review
130
Visit Teen Slut Collection

Teen Slut Collection
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 50 scenes available with a new scene every 7 days or so.
- Videos available as WMV 640x480 and Ipod format. Photos are around 1536x2048, zip archive available, but you only get around 40 images per set and they are not that awesome.
- Hardcore action, including a few anal scenes.
- One or two cute looking European/ German girls (not that many though. Jenny is the girl on the header and she is probably one of the best). Overall a very amateurish look that is sometimes cute.
- Access to a pretty decent network with some interesting fetishes (machine sex, latex and rubber fetish as well as BDSM and extreme stuff)
- Pretty varied content
- Streaming works very well, although it's a bit fuzzy even on the highest setting.
Cons: - The rest of the network is a lot better IMO as this site feels like it's updated with old content. A lot of the stuff on here has a 90's vibe, and several updates are only 5 minutes or so.
- Most scenes are in German, which can be a bit awkward when there is a 3-4 minute set up that you don't understand, or the girl stares at the camera and says something in German.
- Pretty tame sex, a lot of the stuff is very vanilla boy girl action, which is really disappointing comparing how intense the rest of the network is. Only 2-3 anal scenes, and threesomes. Overall it feels like old school plain porn with no really special zing. The girls are okay, not that incredible looking. Only one or two camera angles, not that great light or make-up. Overall average stuff.
- Download speeds were very slow on this site for me. The rest of the network was okay but here I could barely download anything. At least the streaming worked fine.
Bottom Line: I joined this network mostly for the more exotic content like Gang Bank Arena or Latex Slut Show, but was looking forward to this site as a German version of Teen Mega Sex or Teen Core Club. I had hoped that they would have a lot of hot looking European girls doing pretty freaky stuff, with a lot of extreme sex.

Maybe it was the fact that I had high expectations, but I was very disappointed. First of all I had issues downloading stuff and while customer support was responsive and tried to help me I couldn't figure it out. Sometimes things would work fine, other times I would get time-outs and 401 errors every few minutes.

Luckily the streaming worked fine and I could watch all content on-line. I was also able to download the photos easily and the zip archives were very convenient. Unfortunately, the images felt very amateurish with poor lighting and the action not always framed properly. Which sadly is true for most videos too.

Don't join this particular site expecting high quality videos or HD clarity in your scenes. I remember one particular video where the sex takes place in a bathroom and the only light seems to be from the camera. It basically looks like a grainy video, shot with a phone. Add some strange techno music and it really feels more unsettling that erotic.

While most scenes are not as bad as the one I described above I don't think anything stood out as incredible good looking. Cameras at strange angles, very little make-up and fuzzy action shots are pretty common. Also most of the solo scenes are only 5 minutes which is really a shame. There are some really cute girls in stockings and nice heels, but we only get a few minutes before the screen goes black. I almost wonder if these are audition tapes or something like that.

On top of the average quality of the videos from a technical aspect, the actual models are not incredible. Some of the girls are cute, but for the most part the lack of make-up and better light doesn't help the average looking girls. Don't join expecting anything close to Teencoreclub or 21 sextury to name only a few networks with gorgeous European babes. Also some of the girls look like they should not be on a teen site, maybe a 30 to 40 year old site.

Also, I'd like to mention that some of the male models are very rough looking and some scenes were ruined for me by their look. I know the male models shouldn't matter too much, but the site has several shots of the guys making out with the girl, giving them head or just standing around looking smug. It kinda gave the site a creeper vibe, but that might be just me. Imagine older guys that look like they have been in a few drunk fist fights to get an idea of the average male model on here.

To make things even worse the site itself is not the best in the world. They have a basic search, but it's not that accurate (you have to search for the exact description of the scene so searching anal will not return the one DP scene on there.)

While the navigation works fine it's rather basic and the whole design feels a bit outdated. Also I believe some scenes are tagged wrong (for example you select a model but get several girls some of which should really not be there)

Overall the bottom line is that this site is a rather average experience, nowhere as exciting or interesting as the rest of the network. Check out the rest of the sites you get included in the membership and don't make your decision based on what you see here.
Purely as a bonus site this is okay, but as a main dish it's a let down.

11-13-11  09:35pm

Replies (0)
Review
131
Visit Teenrotica

Teenrotica
(0)

70.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Around 240 individual models with several scenes, coming in at around 1200 photo scenes and around 280 videos (some very cute lesbian action but mostly solo videos)
- Most models are incredible and as far as I cna tell they are not the same few girls that show up on every site.
- A lot of corsets, stockings and high heels. I don't think I've seen such variations in outfits on many sites. Very nice and classy.
- Most scenes have around 150-200 images and you get to see the girl strip from cute dress or skirt or what not as well as play with a dildo or touch herself.
-Decent navigation (has some errors, but nothing huge) you can search by type of content, bra size, hair color or model name. Although I don't think all scenes are labeled correctly.
- They have some pee scenes and a few anal scenes, a bunch of lesbian scenes and 4 vaginal fisting scenes (including a girl with 3 dildos in her vagina.) oh and around 10 blow job scenes... not too spectacular but I guess it's okay.
Cons: - I don't think the site is still updating. I've been here for a month and I don't believe they got anything new. (some )
- Some links don't work and my download speed varied greatly, sometimes timing out. Might be just me, but a FYI.
- Videos are about 9 minutes or so and are almost all under 100 mb... I thing this is a dead giveaway as to the quality of the scenes in terms of resolution. Don't bother is what I'm saying.
- The action in the videos is also sub par so in case you missed my last point, the videos here are an after-thought and you shouldn't expect anything else.
- The photo scenes get a bit repetitive since all the girls seem to use rather similar toys (having a sybian or a massage wand or a selection of larger dildos would have been nice) but overall the cuteness of the girls saves the site (as long as all you want are solo photo-sets)
Bottom Line: I joined the site with the mindset that I was joining a photo gallery, despite their claim on the free tour to have a "large HD video pool" don't expect that. They have a lot of models and a lot of photos, as well as some BONUS videos. (I don't know what else to call all the videos where the girl has 9 minutes to get naked and fuck herself with a dildo...)


Now that we cleared that up, let's take a look at the actual images. For the most part I was content with the galleries I downloaded from here. The chief reason for that is that they have an incredible amount of very cute models. Most of the girls are European but you don't get the same Eastern European vibe many sites seem to have nowadays.
They have girls from Portugal, France, Finland, UK, anywhere in Europe, you name it and they probably have it (even one girl from Mongolia). They of course also have a lot of US models and you can easily navigate the girls by age, haircolor, country or horoscope (I guess most models here are Aquarius...not sure how it helps but there you go, now you know).

Sadly, they do the old porn trick of claiming every one is 18 or at most 20. The oldest girl on the site is supposedly 23 and there is only one.... of course when you look through the girls they mostly look 25-ish, but whatever.

Anyhow, for the most part the girls look young-ish, have some make-up but not incredibly ridiculous amounts of it (for the most part, as one or two of the "18 year olds" on here needed a lot of foundation and pig-tails to pass as under 30)

What matters more though is that the girls personality seems to shine through their sets. I suspect that they had the girls bring their own wardrobes from home, because I felt a strong consistency. One model is all innocent and dressed in white, while another is playful and has rainbow colored socks or what not. Overall, I'd say they did a great job with giving most of the photo scenes personality (intentionally or not)

That being said, they do have some very weak photos where it feels like they tried to pad the gallery with shots that are almost the same (girl moves her hips a bit or something like that) More focus on the dildo and masturbation would have been nice. In several sets the dildo action is maybe 15 photos out of 150... Not good enough.

Navigation, while okay also had some issues. They have a big add for MC-Nudes.com that never goes away. At the bottom of the member's page they have a link to a free preview and a few other Join now promotional stuff. Small stuff, but it shows that someone doesn't care enough.

Furthermore, the specials on the site are nothing but a few more similar galleries. It's really a joke. The vote for a model feature they seem to be very proud off doesn't really seem to do anything and I found it a useless gimmick to make users feel like they are involved.

Oh and the biggest negative point is that they don't seem to be updating anymore, so yeah... that's pretty huge.

All things considered this is not a bad site, or better said this looks like it was a good site back in 2008. Nowadays it feels outdated and lacking. I'd say you can get much better content at Nubiles, X-art, probably Met-art or Karup-s PC.

If you really like some of the models in the preview page ( and there are a lot of cute ones) consider joining once to get what you want and then more on to better sites.

They get a 90 for the quality of models and a 50 for everything else so I guess around 70 is the correct score.

10-15-11  12:35pm

Replies (0)
Review
132
Visit Teens 3some

Teens 3some
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - the site is a bit confusing with 3 different categories threesomes, threesomes with DP and archive. The archive claims 57 videos, the threesome section claims 11 videos and the DP threesome 21...I am not sure how much content this means but there are enough videos to satisfy all your threesome needs. You can download the videos in clips or in three different sizes, the high one being very nice (I think around 1000x something)

- Each scene has photos around 200 at 1280px × 853px or such. and there are zipped archives.

- There are quite a lot of different models and most of them are very cute. There is a lot of variation overall with outdoors scenes, two girls and one guy, even a girl with a shaved head...

- Most scenes look like the girl is having fun, although some of the DP seem a bit uncomfortable. I never had the sensation the girl was abused, which makes the scenes much more arousing...

- Weekly updates
Cons: - A better search function would have been an improvement, but we do have a model search which is pretty nice and the somewhat confusing DP or no DP threesome selection...

- The language barrier makes itself felt and I wish more scenes had subtitles or some sort of interview...then again this might be only me.

- The amount of content is a bit small but they are increasing it fast.

- Download speeds were a tad slow at times.

- The flash player was painfully slow at times...but maybe that was just my connection so no points taken off for that.

- More network integration would be nice for this collection of sites.

- More model info would also be nice.
Bottom Line: This site is very nice. I had misted it the first time I joined this network becuase I focused on Teen Sex Movs and the likes, now I decided to try it out and before I knew it I had downloaded half the movies on there. So many of the models are just adorable and seeing them do hardcore and DP's is incredibly arousing. I also appreciated the different settings and costumes (I remember a particular scene where a model is dressed as a nurse and the male models are in doctor gears...it was much hotter than it sounds..)

The whole network does a very good job of highlighting hot, barely legal teens. My only complaint being that the webmasters don't highlight the models more. I joined Nublies recently and the people there make an art out of showcasing the models. They have interviews, photo sessions and separate galleries for the girl's ass or boobs...I'm not saying go that far but at least have some basic model page with some info and maybe links to other videos in the network.

Also I'd love it if they would switch to a better video codec. WMV is good but it creates huge files, comapred to mp4 for example. I often looked at a video and pondered if I really want a 1gb file on my pc or if I'll just stream the scene for now...

The site is solid and I enjoyed it a lot but there is some room for improvement. Focus more on the girls, they are adorable and your biggest asset!

Oh before I forget, another good thing is that the male models look about the same age like the females. It makes the scenes much more believable.

Anyhow, please work on offering more features for the user. Even more video formats and more search options as well as more focus on the girls!!!! (cannot say that too often) and you'll have a nearly flawless site.

10-05-09  06:33pm

Replies (0)
Review
133
Visit Teens Love Anal

Teens Love Anal
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Decent price for the amount of content you get (something like 3000 videos across the entire network), and around 76 videos on this site ( the tag system says you get a total of 171 anal scenes across the whole network with a handful at Exxxtra Small and a few more at Lust HD).

- All scenes come in multiple resolutions and have zipped photo archives.

- Access to most of the Team Skeet network (some sites are not included, for example Family Strokes or Daughter Swap, but you get about 28 other sites)

- Website is decently easy to use on both desktop and mobile. Easy to search for certain categories in the entire network (unfortunately no easy way to just see all models that shot a scene for one site.) Fast load times, no issues with download speeds. Good technical site.

- Good looking models with a good mix of new faces and familiar models (Jillian Janson, Moka Mora, Holly Hendrix are some of the common names you'll see here).
Cons: - Just 1 update per month. You get more content inside the Team Skeet network, but more frequent updates would be nice especially since the site is relatively small.

- Full page ad to unlock the rest of their network as soon as you log in. Not that many ads once you’re inside, but the updates show several videos that are locked and there are periodic prompts to “unlock” other sections of the site. It's a bit annoying they make these ads look like they are just another scene until you look closer.

- Several scenes have a plot that at times can interrupt the action. For me this is a plus, but it may depend on your taste. Just be ready to spend about 5-10 minutes out of the standard 30-35 minutes for each scene, on a story.

- Photos were a bit disappointing (if you care about still images) Several scenes don't have that many shots of the action and while they do offer screen caps in a zip archive as well I wish there were more dedicated photos.
Bottom Line: I had never joined the Team Skeet network since it seemed to be yet another big budget network that didn’t stand out with content that unique, however I am pleased to discover that is not the case. Or rather, I should say, they have the good parts of a big network (lots of videos, fast downloads and decent webdesign) but enough unique flair that that their videos stand out. They have a lot of models you have seen on other sites (Zoey Monroe, Dakota Skye, Angel Smalls) but what’s different here is the effort they go to make most of the scenes have a plot.

For example, the scene with Alina West titled Mom Knows Best starts off with pretty standard BJ and masturbation action until about 10 minutes in when the “mom” walks in and scolds the two actors. Cut to about 4 minutes of the mom explaining that “you can’t take my daughter’s virginity, you’ll have to have anal sex instead” and then things jump right into anal while the “mom” coaches Alina. Now, I’m not a huge fan of the whole incest theme, but the way the scene is structured is certainly different from most sites that seem to only be focused on gonzo scenes with no plot whatsoever. Everyone involved acts over the top in a lighthearted way, the anal action is well shot and in the end the whole movie stands out as a pretty hot scene.

Some other examples are a scene with Arya Fae where she spends several minutes playing with a fidget spinner anal plug, before her step dad finds her and the scene proceeds as expected… except she has a spinner but plug inserted for most of the action. Or Yhivi pretending to be a virgin who accidentally has anal sex the first time, as both her and her boyfriend comment several times during the movie.

Hopefully, you get the idea… most scenes have kinda goofy scenarios that will either work for you and make the whole movie more interesting or will put you off because they’re too outlandish. Keeping in theme with the kinda goofy scenarios none of the scenes are really rough. The sex, while well shot and plenty energetic is almost always on the playful side rather than the intense, slapping and spitting side.

They also have a lot of scenes about step brothers and moms so if that’s a big turnoff maybe this isn’t the best site for you, especially since the setup is usually brought up at least a few times during a scene.

Overall, if their approach to setting up the scene works for you, this is a pretty great site. My biggest con is that they only have 76 scenes and are updating relatively infrequently, however the content in the rest of the network makes up for at least some of this.

If you can find it on one of their many deals, this is a good buy for sure, especially if you enjoy a bit of plot with your anal videos.

12-17-18  11:30am

Replies (0)
Review
134
Visit Teens Natural Way

Teens Natural Way
(0)

60.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -interesting niche of teenagers having sex outdoors
-hot teens doing hardcore (some different models form the rest of the network, some very hot models make a return)
-interesting photos, made to look like 80's porn but with hot teens (uncertain if that is a result of the outdoors or if it was planned)
Cons: -very small amount of content and in some cases you only get photos instead of both photos and videos(about 14 sets with only 7 or 8 videos)
-navigation a bit buggy (had pages skip or load funny)
-download speed is slow for photosets (even with a download manager I had a hard time getting above 100kb)
- no foreseeable updates
Bottom Line: I would never sign up only for this website. No updates, small amount of content, lack of videos for all sets. No matter how much you want to see teens getting fucked outdoors there are better sites for it or at least get this site as part of a network pass. However, the photos could be entertaining when you're tired of scenes shot in a studio.

08-02-09  05:24am

Replies (0)
Review
135
Visit Teeny Pass

Teeny Pass
(0)

60.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - This is the main access page to a pretty large network of young adult sites. (check out my older review on Casting couch teens for more details about my favorite site in the network)
- In total across all sites you get around 2500 exclusive movies and another 1500 or so scenes from other sites and DVD's
- Some very very cute girls, a lot of unknown girls and some pretty realistic sex scenes along with some of the best pre-sex interviews I've seen.
- Mostly regular sex, a handful of threesomes and no anal, DP or any other crazy stuff.
- Scenes have images to go along, but no zip files
- Easy navigation and streaming works well.
- No technical issues over the past 3 years when I've been a member on and off. It's always easy to cancel, no hidden fees, no log-outs or site down issues.
Cons: - No recent updates. The archive is there and I always find some videos I missed before, but as far as I can tell the entire network is dead.
- The big downside of the entire network is the quality of the video and images. The highest video size offered is 480x360 and none of the images have zip archives.
- The web design is stuck in the late 90's with no model search features, no way to navigate all the scenes available on all network sites and generally just a old fashioned feel to it (strange cartoons in the banners of the sites, especially for Horny Spanish fly...)overall the whole network just feels like it had better days.
- They have a daily download limit that doesn't allow you to download more than a handful of videos (I believe this is a recent development, but it's very disheartening)
Bottom Line: I like to join this network every 6 months of so, every time hoping that things have improved since I last visited, sadly that is not the case. This network is old and shows it's age: videos have poor resolution, web design is very basic and the scenes remind one of the lighting and style of the 90's. That being said, I still join every once in a while so there is some reason to give these sites a second look.

The big bonus of the network is that the girls are all very cute (they have Lexi Belle, Sandy Sweet, Proxy Paige along with a bunch of girls I've never heard off but they all look incredible) and the action while pretty standard is interesting enough. Almost all sites follow the formula of either an interview with the girl then a standard sex scene or the guys drive around and find a girl stranded for some reason in a parking lot. They give her a ride, we get to hear some ridiculous story and then we get about 20 minutes of sex.

The formula is pretty standard, and even sites dedicated to blow jobs like the big swallow of big league facials follow this trend with a healthy dose of interview and regular sex thrown in for good measure.

Overall I'd say that despite the names and supposed different focuses of the sites pretty much all scenes in this network could have been on one site. Even the ethnic focused sites like Spanish fly feature several girls that could be at home on any other area of the network. When you join you basically get around 2500 scenes that are very similar and pretty standard.

Now, that being said the guys behind this network got the formula down to an art. The models are all incredibly hot and I have yet to see an awkward or uncomfortable interview. Even if the girl is shy at first within a few minutes she is giggling and seems at ease. Even better at no point do the director or male actor seem disrespectful or insulting. All scenes look and feel like fun, classic porn.

If I'd have to compare the network to anything exploited college girls comes to mind, but I'd say the average model on here is a lot more attractive and experienced, making for some very hot videos.

That's the good part. The models and the directors involved. The downside is pretty much everything else from the poor video quality to the download limits that make it almost impossible to get all the videos you want during one or two membership cycles. Add to that the lack of recent updates and the network looses a lot of points.

What it comes down to is a preference choice, are realistic interviews and hot models that you probably haven't seen on the other big networks worth putting up with the technical downsides? For me the action is often more arousing than an insane DP, but with so many choices out there it's hard to truly recommend this network.

If you're on the fence about joining I'd recommend checking out videobox where they have several (if not all) of the teeny bopper club scenes. That way you can get a feel for the kind of scenes you'd be getting here with basically no risk (videobox will most definitely have something that is worth the 9 bucks subscription fee.)

05-13-12  05:28pm

Replies (0)
Review
136
Visit Ten.com

Ten.com
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Access to network, with several interesting sites such as Asian 18, Ass meat, Sorority Sluts, etc. Mostly hardcore stuff gathered from various other studios including 21 sextury, Fusion X etc. Overall all about 3766 scenes on ten.com
- Decent amount of content, but nowhere near the likes of Videobox. (Anal(1110 videos) Tits(3218 videos) and even less when it comes to fetish content like BDSM or BBW)
- Navigation is relatively easy, it's easy to go to different sites in the network, easy to find specific categories (BDSM, Teen etc) as long as you're only looking for fairly mainstream stuff. No really niche stuff
- Several types of streaming available (from standard to HQ) although only around 1768 trully HQ scenes
- They have an iphone app. Couldn't test it out since I don't have an iPhone, but I guess it's a nice bonus.
Cons: - No downloads of any kind, only streaming.
- Several sites share the content. The same scenes from 21 sextury can be seen on ass meat (the anal focused site) and ten.com.
- Several categories are rather obscure. There is a WTF category, not sure what that is supposed to mean. Also gonzo and POV are available but the content is the same for both.
- No easy to search studio page.
- Gay porn is mixed into the regular porn, so out of 1110 anal videos about half are "his first gay sex/ his first gay cock"
Bottom Line: Ten.com and the entire network offered here is a decent option if you want to experience several studios and only want streaming, but it's by no means a mind blowing experience and almost in all cases you'd be better off with a bigger network.

First of all I understand a few months back they offered download as well as streaming, but this isn't the case anymore. The site is all streaming now, which works well but might put many people off so be warned. I had no issues streaming in different resolutions, but again, there is no way to save scenes.

Now that that's out of the way let's look at the good part. There are several good scenes available here, some from DVD's some from other sites and studios. It's relatively easy to search through them either using categories or searching for a star's name or a studio granted you know the studio name since there is no main studio page listing everyone who contributed content here.

Some categories are a bit misleading and several are redundant (why do we need a small tits, college and pettite when all lead to the same handfull of scenes?). Also I couldn't find an easy way to filter the gay porn. Luckily the previews are animated so you can see exactly what type of scene you're getting before clicking on it.

There are some ads in the main page of the site and the update schedule is a bit old (it was telling me about some scenes that were uploaded two days ago,) but overall the technical aspect of the site is not bad. A studio page and more relevant categories could help, as would a top hottest scenes or top new updated scenes, but overall it works okay.

The scenes themselves are very varied, depending from studio to studio. Some are hotter than others and some were rather disappointing on who or in quality, but again it depends on who originally created them. Overall I don't think there is any exclusive content here, which is a shame.

Bottom line: the site is okay, but not stellar. The lack of pictures or downloads really hinders as does the lack of exclusive content. Overall I'd say join some other bigger network and get more bang for your buck. However if you're really bored with the major sites and have some cash to spare you might want to try this network, who knows you could find a studio you really like and follow them next.

06-17-12  01:57pm

Replies (1)
Review
137
Visit The Pantyhose Site

The Pantyhose Site
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 24 videos, the most recent of which go all the way up to an impressive resolution of 1920x1080, and down to 320x 240 if you want the video fast. And the videos DO download fast. this network has one of the fastest download speeds I have seen.

- 32 photo sets at 1440px × 810px with zipped archives available. Each set has around 200+ photos and they look very good.

- the girls are very varied and you can see them in several scenes around the network. We have girls from the barely legal category all the way to borderline MILF. Which is really nice.

- each scene is focused on the girls legs and the panties they are wearing. There is an impressive variation in the girls outfits and stockings are ripped open quite often AKA the sex is pretty energetic, but much tamer than the Facial Abuse stuff.

- the girls often play with themselves before the sex scene, there is oral sex, I believe some anal and some groupsex as well, so that's nice and varied.
Cons: - a network wide search would have been nice. I really like Amai Liu and I would have liked to find all her scenes at once. Also a category search for videos would be nice. Something to allow me to select anal scenes without having to browse the thumbnails...

- you can see the difference between the older sets both in quality of video as well as how beautiful the girls are. The site is definitely improving, but I only enjoyed the more recent stuff, to be honest...

- sometimes the preview thumbnail was not the bets shot out of the scene. I'd like it if there was a way to maybe make the previews interactive (roll mouse over) or if there was a model page or something similar...A lot of hot girls didn't stand out like this...
Bottom Line: As part of the network and with the discount from PU this site will be interesting for any leg lover. However the fact that there are only 24 videos doesn't make it a must. It's more of a nice bonus if you joined the network for another, bigger site.

However, many scenes are well done and the variation makes it interesting. After a few more updates this site will be a really great place for anyone who wants to see girls having sex in pantyhose. If you're looking for more softcore stuff, this isn't really the place for you. The girls won't strip for half the video and turn around showing off their but through pantyhose. Sex and cumming on stockings is the big draw. Also there aren't any footjobs, really, which in my book is a big bonus, but some people might dislike it.

Finally, I'd like to say that I noticed a tendency of having more Asian models among the recent updates. Which is also a good thing in my opinion, but maybe others will disagree. Up to personal preference I guess.


Bottom line: not a deal maker here but definitely a nice bonus to an overall decent network for those who prefer hardcore porn.

10-08-09  02:45pm

Replies (0)
Review
138
Visit Torbe Network

Torbe Network
(0)

80.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - A fairly large network which offers 34 sites (although several only have around 20-40 videos). Overall you should get 800 scenes, most of them available in various formats (including a PSP and Ipod format which I took full advantage off)

- Most scenes are decent quality (as usual older ones are lower quality and as you get newer stuff it goes up to around 1280x720)

- Some sites have zipped photos, some don't. The ones that did have images were decent quality at 1200x 800.

- The big draw of the site are the amateur models which are mostly Spanish. A lot of them are very cute and they seem to really have fun. Almost all the network has a light-hearted feel and the girls giggle and seem relaxed. Also there is very little of the classic porn modeling where the girl looks turned-on but everyone can tell she's not.

- Downloads worked flawlessly and streaming was perfect.

- I had no trouble signing up or canceling, despite what everyone else on here mentioned.
Cons: - More scenes would have been nice, especially in the bukkake site.

- Several sites in the network are dedicated to only one model, which is fine as long as you like that model. It can be a hit or miss.

- Sometimes you get too much of the male models, their interaction with the girls is funny, but when the guys wear masks or make funny faces...it can get distracting.

- Some download managers have problems with this site( I recommend the firefox download them all extension. It has yet to fail me)
Bottom Line: Overall this network was a pleasant surprise, but I am very interested in teen and amateur porn. As such I tend to easily forgive a site is they make silly mistakes or if the male models are too in your face, hell I'll even accept a somewhat funky guy introducing almost all videos as long as I get a feeling of "this is unscripted, real sex with girls that are having fun." Which is what this site is all about.

Like I said you have very little of that glamour, airbrushed, playboy feel to the models, they don't open their mouths slightly, looking "sexy." they laugh and gag on too much semen and run to the bathroom and genuinely look cute and nervous. This feel made the site unique for me, now many people will find this boring or annoying and you have to be sure you like the models before joining.

Another point you should be aware off is that there are only a few anal scenes and overall the girls are treated very politely, there is no abuse or humiliation even in a mild form. Of course this is a double edged sword and as a person who liked a little rough sex I was a bit disappointed...but you can't always have your cake and eat it too.

For me the highlights of the network were TORBE COUPLES and the Freak Bukkake site as well as the dream teens. In all three the focus really seems to be on the girls and there are a ton of cute models who do hardcore (again, so anal or deep-throating, but we do get oral and regular sex in various positions)

The conclusion? I personally will keep an eye on this network and I hope they will continue uploading (they now have a nifty preview section so you know what's coming), but I am also a person that enjoyed Pierre Woodman tremendously and one of my top sites is Nubiles.com, because of the interview videos they have with the girls.

Either way, you should check out their tour page, because I find it's very descriptive of what you get inside (even if the view more buttons for each site doesn't work, at least you'll get a feel for the network)

11-01-10  07:40pm

Replies (1)
Review
139
Visit Try Teens

Try Teens
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 200 scenes with new ones still being added regularly (it looks like a new scene roughly every month, although you get a more updates on other sites if you join through the teen core club network)
- New scenes are available at 950 x 540, but back a few years in the database stuff is somewhat lower quality and the first handful of scenes are only available as clips.
- All scenes have many large images 853px × 1,280px (no zip archive though)
- A lot of very very hot girls, including several exclusive models. All scenes are exclusive to the site and almost all scenes include deep throat and anal, with some including DP.
- Great light and camerawork, a bit static in the majority of scenes, but more dynamic recently.
- Web design is simple to a fault sometimes, but works well enough. Downloads are fast although most videos are around 700 mb. No log-outs, no time-out and no daily limits that I could find. Overall decent technical specs.
- Very hot recent updates (see bottom line f
Cons: - As I mentioned before the design of the site, as all sites in the Teen core club network, is very basic. No options to search for all scenes by one model or even search on the site itself(Aspen Richardsen is available on several of their sites for example...but which ones? and how many scenes? no way to find out)
- No options when it comes to downloading videos, past clips or full scene. No choices of SD or HD videos or different encoders. You get a download link to a video and that’s all. Not even streaming of the entire scene is available.
- A lot of the older scenes include no interview, no stripping or girls playing with themselves, just straight to the sex, very formulaic. For me that was a bit of a downside of the site.
- Somewhat on the expensive especially since nowadays several of the girls also appear on 21 sextury and other sites (they used to have some great exclusive models a few years back, not so much)
Bottom Line: Lk2fireone's review (should show one or two reviews underneath mine) really hits home for me, especially his bottom line. This is a great network with some great female models, but I always felt like the guys running the site didn't really know what to do with the hot girls. The sex always felt a bit too formulaic to me, almost boring. Girls that on other sites would be incredible become average here because all the sets looked the same, all shots were wide angle and all outfits were discarded within seconds.

That being said I was a member of this network for a very long time because they always managed to get very attractive, young girls and they always had them doing anal, DP and impressive deep throats. The hot models always sold this site for me. In fact I believe this network had several of the girls that now appear on other Russian sites (firstanalquest, 21sextury months before they did and often they do much more intense stuff here than they end up doing for other websites.)

That's the good part, now for the bad part

The updates are very sporadic with some months seeing an update every week and sometimes one scene per month or none at all (to get an idea go to teencoreclub and click to see all updates, they show a date for each new scene and you can easily judge which site is no longer maintained and which receives a lot of love. Looks like Try Teens received almost daily updates in December and since then the number of new scenes has slowed down significantly)

The webdesign is too simple for a modern network and the lack of a model page listing all the girls scenes is a huge downside. An easy way to search for type of content would also be nice. It used to be that all DP scenes went to Double Teamed Teens, Ass to Mouth had the heavy anal stuff and Try Teens got a mix of regular vaginal only/ anal sex. Nowadays it seems like all new updates get posted here and several of the more recent scenes are of the same models one boy-girl scene and one threesome with DP scene. (Stacy and Avery both come to mind, but I’m sure there are more such models.)



This strange update scheme brings me to the several dead sites the network owns. This is traditional TeenCoreClub practices. They launch a new site, update heavily for a while and abandon it in a month or so. In fact out of the older sites Try Teens is the only one still regularly active. The other site heavily updated in the network is HardcoreYouth, which while interesting is very similar to other Russian sites to the point where one can barely distinguish between a scene on Firstanalquest or Hardcoreyouth.



Now, all of that negative stuff being said on my latest subscription I was very pleasantly surprised. The style of the last handful of videos uploaded here has changed quite a bit with the most recent ones including very interesting interviews with the girls. The English is horrible and there is a lot of awkwardness, but for the first time you get a sense of who these girls are. Several of them are surprisingly outgoing and look like they are having fun. They talk about anal sex comfortably and make the whole scene a lot more interesting.

This is only applicable on the latest five or so scenes, but damn it makes the site a lot more interesting, all of a sudden the girls are more than just pretty faces who get fucked in the same standard scene. They now have about 10 minutes of solo girl, stripping and toy play. There is nothing hotter in my opinion than a girl using a dildo on her anus and then asking for a real cock and now this site has that, adding a sense of uniqueness that was seriously lacking.

The camera is also not as static as before, which could be a downside for some, but for me it looks a hell of a lot more interesting to get some close-ups of the girls face, some shots of her ass, a bit of a wide-shot. Overall the last five or so scenes on the site have been more interesting and arousing to me than twenty of the previous ones. If only they could go back in time and get Aspen to do one of those interviews before she gets a serious pounding…



I only hope that they continue with this kind of updates and don’t abandon the site anytime soon. With a few more updates this site would be a great source for young girls in hardcore action. Despite the high price when you consider all the scenes you get by joining I have to recommend Try Teens, especially if you enjoyed Firstanalquest, Teenmegaworld and other similar Russian sites.

05-17-12  07:30pm

Replies (2)
Review
140
Visit Try Teens

Try Teens
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -one of the best sites for hardcore teens
-many very good looking girls (last time I checked there were around 150 scenes and while not all girls are very hot at least 120 scenes are incredible)
-a lot of anal, some cream-pies and deep-throat all in one site
-relatively easy browsing once you get used to their style (however the simplicity also becomes a problem as you can't look for a particular model or top rated scenes)
Cons: -the browsing can be too simple (you can't look for a particular model or top rated scenes)
-all videos download as the same name so you have to go back manually and change them
-a bit pricey
-some girls repeat themselves in the database
-no story, just sex
Bottom Line: If you want to see teens getting fucked this is the place. No story, no interviews. The videos are like follows: guy walks in gets teen naked in under 5 minutes, blowjob, sex, maybe anal, cream-pie or facial. Simple and yet due to the hot girls on here very effective. As a fan of hardcore teens this is the best site for me.
The quality of the videos (size wise) and more user friendly browsing would have been great, but the site works as it is too.

08-02-09  04:48am

Replies (0)
Review
141
Visit Tushy.com

Tushy.com
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Regular updates and ability to preview upcoming scenes(~125 scenes available now- March 2017)
-Zip folders for high quality photos(2000x3000)
-Lots of video options available for downloads and streaming( up to 4k for the most recent ones)
-Very hot models and including ~50 first anal exclusives.
-Most scenes have a short story including an intro from the female model. A lot of the scenarios are very hot and add to the scene.
- On sale every so often for a very reasonable price (~$10).
Cons: -Sometimes one of the downloads has speed issues ( the 720p on one scene was slower than the 4k about every 5th video I downloaded. Most be one bad server)
-Not part of a network, you only get access to one site.
-Some models are in more than 1 scene. If you like the type of model they hire this is not really an issue, otherwise you will miss the variety of a 10+ site network.
Bottom Line: I keep coming back to this site and joining every few weeks to get the updates. The models are for the most part incredibly attractive with very good make-up, lighting and very hot outfits (lots of stockings and lingerie.)
The photos are some of the best I have seen for a hardcore site. The photographers really know how to catch the best side of each model and get some amazing stills.
And the videos are even better with a sexy introduction that adds to the scene, and 20+ min of good sex, shot in very nice light with good cuts and shots.

Overall, if this is your type of site (glamorous anal) this is one of the best in class. If you're looking for more diversity, different body sizes, different types of sex, this may not be your cup of tea.

03-26-17  07:31pm

Replies (0)
Review
142
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Tons and tons of content, they claim around 5467 video sets and thousands more image sets. There is plenty of stuff to download here, even ignoring some of the older content which has a lower resolution you won't be bored.
-Frequent updates with daily new content (2 videos and 3 image sets every day!) Each image set has zip archives and around 100 images. The videos come in different viewing options including clips or full length.
- Lots of good looking porn models, a lot of well known names (Lexi Belle, Sasha Rose, Chastity Lynn) as well as several new faces.
- The content I believe follows a Glamour approach with beautiful pictures and some good if rather softcore video sets. Great light, good make-up and some amazing outfits, lots of corsets and stockings. Overall a decent amount of variation.
- Navigation is easy, good search categories and it's easy to find content form one model or similar models.
Cons: - Despite the diverse models and outfits the action can feel a bit formulaic at times. This is a big network that tries to cater to the mainstream porn so if you have a specific fetish you might want to go somewhere else. Also don't expect the "hardcore" scenes to be truly hardcore as defined by eastern European anal sites. The site caters to a mostly glamour/ softcore vibe with some great lesbian scenes thrown in the mix. Overall the vast majority of the content and the best stuff is solo masturbation of good looking models.
- They have ads in the member area, nothing to intrusive but it might bother some.
- Some downloads were slow for me, but it might be a unique problem. For some reason I couldn't use my usual download manager with the site and had to use firefox's standard download option.
Bottom Line: I'm not really that interested in softcore and solo masturbation videos so I avoided Twisty's for a long time. However they now have around 218 hardcore videos with about 5 new hardcore scenes added each month, combine that with some great looking models and the huge archive and I was sold. Now let's take a look at what I bought :)

First of all I would not recommend getting the trial unless you're really on the fence about joining. The pass only gets you access to the images and the videos are really with checking out before judging the site. There are some great scenes here with some very passionate girls. I have to say that the lesbian scenes here were some of the best I've seen almost anywhere.

In fact all the girls seem to really be into the scenes and there are very few awkward moments so common in solo scenes were the girl isn't interested.

What probably helps is that the vast majority of the girls here are American models who show up on other sites as well. These are girls who know what they're doing and are enjoying it. On the other hand this means that you shouldn't expect the kind of girls that show up for exploited college girls here.

For the most part the models look like glamour girls. Think Playboy but with a dirtier twist. The girls have professional make up, there are lots of big boobs and the general feeling of large porn-star network.

There's nothing bad with this, just be aware that this is not a niche site and while there are some fetishes present here most of them are older sets from 2006 or 2010 (there are only 24 domination or rough scenes here, about 20 scenes with older women and although they have around 300 anal scenes most of them are solo ass play. Also the last time they uploaded a scene with multiple guys was 2009)

That being said the site does offer a lot of value for the right person. The navigation and search options are pretty much flawless. The frequent updates, the huge archive the good looking girls it all combines to form a great deal.

Another nice touch is the effort Twisty's is putting in creating a community. They ask for feedback on models, you can comment on videos and photo-sets and they have a Treat of the month and the year, a sort of playboy playmate. They now also offer live shows once in a while, so overall good stuff that makes for a much nicer and unique membership experience.

While the majority of the action didn't really speak to me I still found dozens of scenes that I enjoyed and will have to join up again in the future.

06-25-12  10:33am

Replies (0)
Review
143
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(0)

95.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: - huge amount of content
- easy browsing and downloading (you can estimate how easy the browsing is by looking at the free preview, I have rarely seen such a well done preview)
- regular and massive updates
- countless niches and once more: A LOT of content
- very reasonable price
- great blog entries and a nice community
- nice options of saving videos/ editing them
Cons: - the content is all from dvd's so not real fresh faces or exclusive content
- the new premium offers make browsing a bit more difficult (if you only have the basic membership you must make sure to de-select the premium content)
- sometimes the streaming player freezes and you have to download a video to see it
Bottom Line: This is simply the most porn for the price, and the most varied too. From teens to milfs and fat porn they have it all. I think they only miss gay but they have a special site for that too. The errors are minor and I will become a member again soon.

The only reason I didn't give it 100 is becuase I never tried contacting the staff but they seemed a bit distant, and the website (the streaming player part) can be a bit buggy. However, unless you want a niche of porn this is a great deal.

08-01-09  01:50pm

Replies (0)
Review
144
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots and lots of content 11,196 DVD's each with a few different scenes for a total of somewhere like 66,000 scenes. Out of those 472 DVD's are HD quality for a total of 4500 HD scenes.
- Options for download are AVI at 360p MP4 at 520p and for the HD MP4 at 720 p
- Frequent updates (daily DVD's)
- Excellent selection of DVD's with many titles from several different studios, a lot of niches offered, but the focus seems to be on 18 and rough sex. (around 10,000 18+ scenes, 10,000+ anal and only around 5000 mature and under 400 softcore; 500 BBW, 600 European and around 3000 behind the scenes)
- Nice browsing options including a very convenient "Network feature" so you can quickly select the kind of scene you want.
- Streaming works well, good ways to find similar content or more content with the same model, overall good technical webdesign and functional too.
- Great download speeds, very fast no time-outs no issue downloading multiple scenes overnight.
Cons: - A few videos aren't labeled properly/ some links don't lead to the right scene. I remember the site suggesting more Amai Liu (teen) scenes but instead it led me to a group scene with some mature models.
- Many of the older DVD's are only available as avi at 320p, while this is in no way the fault of the site, it's a bit of a disappointment.
- The site has animated adds at the bottom of all pages, no bid deal since it's easy to ignore them, but might be a con for some.
- Sometimes the recommendation engine is not the best. For example after I watched several anal videos on a Max Hardcore scene it recommended me some girl punishing a guy scene. It didn't happen very often, but it was a bit strange.
Bottom Line: It's always hard to review a mega site like this one mostly because the content is taken from DVD's so if the light is bad or the action is filmed at odd angles it's not really the fault of the network. Also the content is not exclusive and it's tough to say how much you could find on other sites in different quality. Would it be a better deal to join Videobox or Videosz or maybe Pornstarnetwork? Hard to say since there is much overlap, but also some DVD's unique to each site.

Also like every other network there are a lot of DVD's here that I wouldn't spend money on, but I can hardly blame the site for it, they are simply offering everything they can get the license to.

That being said Videosz had a lot of content and are updating aggressively, being very close to the offering of Videobox (I think right now Videobox has 1000 or 2000 more DVD's but considering you have to get an extra membership with evilangel or Kink or whatever to get everything on Videobox maybe the two are about equal).

The one downside to Videosz is that some scenes are on here twice under different names, probably as studios released different DVD's with content they already had out there. It's not a huge problem but I'd say I found maybe 30 or so scenes that were on here twice, mostly older stuff. Videosz also seemed to have more of an issue with correctly identifying the actresses in the movies, and sometimes their recommendation engine was a bit off.

I'd also add that Videobox seems to have more studios available on their network, but Videosz has more content from each of the studios they do feature. Also Videosz seems to have more hardcore action and more 18+ while videobox has more of a diversity, with more niches tagged.

Another nice addition to videosz is the so called "networks" like 18&abused, 18 Schoolgirls, 18 babysitters. It's a quick filter link that allows you to get some specific content, now most of it is 18 and something so it's pretty obvious the site's focus is on young adult sex.

Other than this rather minor difference the site is pretty similar to Videobox and the difference is really one of which interface do you prefer. They are both high quality technically, allow for easy preview of the scenes, great download speeds, good value and easy searching.

If you're still purchasing DVD's I'd highly recommend this site or one of the similar DVD network since the quantity of scenes available is unbeatable.

06-03-12  02:03pm

Replies (3)
Review
145
Visit Virginal Visions

Virginal Visions
(0)

60.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - There are around 20 models on ths site and each one has at least 4 galleries (okay, okay, one of them has only 1 gallery but for the most part they have above 4 with one reaching 86 galleries) and around 8 videos. (No zip for photos which are around 768 x 1,024. And videos are coded as Divx and the site claims they are 640x480) A quick calculation results in around 100 galleries and 150 videos (I tried to approximate based on each models's particular content)

- Interesting idea (girls in white underwear, usually getting wet for some reason or stripping, although you never see a nipple,)

- Some cute models who actually look very innocent, thus fitting the site's description

- A lot of interesting bonus material (Panty Cam- around 80 galleries and 140 videdos of girls caught on hidden camera (there are even some nipples here :Gasp of shock:) College Games- around 60 galleries of random girls in their bra's, Parties- the set-up for a masive lesbian orgy...)
Cons: - Navigation and site aspect are horrible. The videos are cut into pieces as are the photo shoots so if you want all the photos from a shoot you have to load 3-4 different paegs and manually download each picture.

- Slow downloads (around 40-50kb for one 8 mb videdo)

- Content get's boring really fast. No matter how cute the models when the most hardcore action on the site is a nipple caught by accident or two girls kissing...well it get's boring....Although some wet camel-toes were pretty nice...

- More model info would be nice (we only get the model name, her age and location)
Bottom Line: I looked at this site becuase it had great potential for a softcore porn site. Imagine a few hot, young girls who slowly reveal what they are capable of doing in front of a camera, all the time looking extremelly inocent and only shedding their white cotton pabnties when they are begged by another girl...hot yes? Well, this site dedspite having a bunch of cute, innocent looking girls who also look like amateurs, manages to mess it up.

They cut the content into small sections (probably as a way of making it look more plentiful than it is) and thus make it hard to navigate and download the content. They don't help users connect with the models (no bio, no interviews, nothing really except a name and age). Finally, they don't harvest the potential of getting young girls wet... They have pool scenes but use bra's that don't become see-through (often the panties do so that's hot...) They don't have two girls undress each other or at least pull at eachother's clothing. Finally, they don't even use the Lolita effect some of the girls could achieve by simly looking into the camera more mischieviously...

The Bonus content is kinda nicee though, the College shots reminded me of Girls Gone Wild but more mild and with less obviously drunk girls...Also the Parties bonus content had potential (it shows many of the site's models together in their underwear...but that's about it...)

Overall, this site had potential, but they stopped half way and thus ended up disapointing. If you really, really love girls in white underwear and you have seen every other site that offers that...maybe you should consider this site...but be warned there will be no nudity, no penises...if that's okay with you great; for me it simply didn't work.

08-13-09  02:30pm

Replies (0)
Review
146
Visit Vixen.com

Vixen.com
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 185 scenes and about 125 models with updates every 5 days.

- The Mad Cheddar sites are pretty well known for shooting high quality glamour hardcore scenes. With all these sites (Vixen, Tushy, Blacked, Blacked Raw and more recently Tushy Raw) you get top notch performers in well lit, well shot and edited scenes that remind me of Playboy but with the Hustler hardcore, if that makes sense. Great content both as far as models and technical quality of the videos and photos.

- Fast downloads, no issues canceling subscriptions, frequent discounts, responsive site on mobile and good search function. From the technical perspective everything works well.

- Great photos that include some great magazine quality solo shots of the models.

- In my opinion more variation in models and scene type than Blacked or Tushy. While most models still have a very specific look there's more variation as far as hair, ethnicity and type of scene including some nice threesomes and orgy scenes.
Cons: - The ads are getting out of control. In the last few months when you first log into the page you get a big slash page advertising all the other sites they own. You click continue and get an auto playing video ad, then more ads on the main page itself. Luckily no ads when you actually select a scene, but it's kinda ridiculous, especially since I already pay for a few of their other sites.

- No real network access. Even if you buy the other sites there's no easy way to see all scenes a model shot for all their sites. A network hub would be nice, network pricing would be even nicer.

- While the site works, I wish there was an easier way to filter out certain models and I wish the categories were more obvious. You end up having to rely on the search bar a lot.

- While more varied than their other sites the scenes can get a bit same-y. I wish they used the set-up stories they have a bit more or maybe had the girls keep on their outfits a bit longer.
Bottom Line: If you like porn there's a good chance you already know what Vixen is all about, the high level of quality, gorgeous models and frequent discounts make it hard to miss the Mad Cheddar sites. They shoot truly great porn that has a very unique glamour feel to it. All the models are incredible, the videos are well shot and they never go into a very hardcore area (no spitting, gagging or really rough sex here) while still keeping the sex pretty intense and active. This site gets top marks from me and while I will point a few of it's flaws below, they are really minor nitpicks.

Most videos are around 40 minutes with about 3-5 minutes of setup. The stories are pretty basic stuff that's easy to ignore, but they are usually presented via a voice over from the girl while showing her in lingerie or undressing. I love this approach to their videos as it removes some of the inherent cheesiness of porn plots and gives you a chance to see the female model in a few different outfits. Unfortunately I don't think they really play around with this enough and almost all the videos have the girls completely nude very quickly, more than once getting naked in a cut-away. It's really a shame since they have the models dress up in some gorgeous lingerie that doesn't get highlighted that much.

Luckily, if any part of the video is not that interesting they have pretty handy markers on the streaming player letting you know when the action switches to another position. It's a great little feature that makes streaming the videos so much better.

If you do decide to download the videos they come in several sizes up to 4k and I've had no problems with download managers. The photos are also awesome and come in zipped archives that are easy to download. Unfortunately there are no behind the scenes videos of the shoots or interviews with the models. I think it would have been cool to see the shooting of the photos since they are clearly staged separate from the sex scene.

One section of the site that adds a bit more content (but is also a bit disappointing) is the Vixen Angels awards. This site is the only one that has a special section for "Angels", which is essentially the equivalent of a Playmate. There are a few photos of the "crowning" (essentially the girl receiving a bunch of Vixen branded stuff) and a photo shoot along with a under 1 minute BTS video of the photo shoot. That said you can't download any of this content and it's maybe 10 photos total. I was really hoping for a brief interview with the model, maybe a longer BTS video and an actual photo shoot that maybe highlighted something unique about the model. As it stands I looked at it once went "meh" and will probably never look at it again.

I gave Tushy a 95 as it's an almost perfect site to me. Vixen's content is not nearly as anal focused (only about 10 scenes) so it doesn't speak to my interests, but it's an absolutely great site all around even if it could polish a few rough edges a bit more. All in all I'd highly recommend it.

12-09-18  08:34pm

Replies (0)
Review
147
Visit Wake Up N Fuck

Wake Up N Fuck
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 270 scenes with updates every 2-4 days (updates are not dated, but you can see when they were uploaded on the forums)

- Videos are available for download in a few resolutions (up to 4k on the more recent ones) No photos unfortunately.

- Most videos are pretty long, I'd say the average is around 1 hour with several longer than that. Often the scenes start with Woodman and the girl having sex and progress to a threesome with other male performers.

- I believe pretty much every scene has anal sex and rough action with deep-throating and slapping. The difference compared to some other Russian themed anal sites is that in most scenes the girls seem to really get into it and go along very enthusiastically. There are a lot of moments that feel genuine and unscripted

- The scenes have the Woodman look to them (filmed in a hotel room, most often with a handheld camera, lots of close up shots and no story really)

- Excellent models that look amazing with pretty minimal makeup
Cons: - Site is dated, the search function works for searching for specific models, but no tags on the videos, no model page, no special features and a relatively hefty price. And videos auto play with a really loud intro.

- I've had issues with certain payment processors (I believe they switched away from some processors a few months back and in the process I ended up losing access.

- Downloads were slow for me sometimes, otherwise they were perfect, no idea what made the difference, maybe clearing cookies helps?

- Don't expect any cute outfits on the girls, different locations any interviews or plot. The site is focused on "girl sleeping" in a hotel room Woodman or another male model walks in and the sex starts. It can get a bit repetitive, but the energetic action plus the combinations of both MMF, MFF threesomes and group sex keep it interesting.

- Woodman is in most scenes and might not be everyone's cup of tea especially if you have issues with dirty talk in a French accent.
Bottom Line: I've been a member of both Woodmancasting X and this site for quite a while now, part of the reason being that the longer you stay a member the more of a discount you get. It's a weird system, but I believe I pay 29,90 euro at this point. Yes, the site bills in euros and there is no really easy way to get a price locked in with USD, so some months you end up paying more. Never thought I'd care about monetary policy when buying porn, but here we are.

That is not the only oddity about the Woodman sites compared to a big network. The entire site seems to be run with a pretty skeleton crew and I've had numerous odd issues that seem to go away eventually (videos not streaming or jumping ahead, the billing issue I mentioned above, passwords reset function not working for a day, that kind of stuff). The support system is also not the greatest and probably the best way to get an answer is to use the forums.

Speaking of, the forums are a big part of the whole experience since Woodman will often tease future updates, engage with the fans and post BTS details. I've followed the woodman forums probably much longer than I've been subscribed to his site since there are a lot of interesting insights into the porn world as well as candid photos and even one or two models who post their thoughts.

Between the forums and the interviews on the casting site you often end up feeling like you know the models here better than girls on other sites. This works very well for the kind of porn Woodman shoots: there are no plots, the girls don't give the somewhat fake porn interviews common on other sites and in several scenes, despite the rough action, you get the sense they are having genuine fun (The way Tina Hot jokes around during her scene is awesome, Megan Rain seems to have a genuine orgasm or two as does Alexi Star, and I'm sure I'm missing a few other great moments).

As I mention above the porn is on the rough side with a lot of face slapping, a lot of name calling (honestly this is one of the few sites where I watch the scenes with the sound off bc the noise and the constant calling the girls rude names gets to me) a lot of DP and closeup of anal gapes, but somehow it also feels more intimate and personal than most porn on other networks. Almost every scene also has several sex scenes, especially the newer scenes. There are several updates here that go close or even over the 2 hour mark.

Oh and of course the models are top notch, several great American models, but mostly European girls that look gorgeous.

Something else to note is that most scenes use condoms, and several of the older scenes are mostly POV with some limited camera angles. Also some scenes feature water sports if that's a big turn off or turn on.

So in conclusion: a dated site with odd technical issues, rough sex that may or may not be everyone's cup of tea, but some amazing models in hardcore action that feels pretty natural and enthusiastic along with a glimpse at what may be the model's true personality. I personally think it's well worth the money, but if you're a fan of one of the big, more glamorous networks this may not be the site for you.

01-09-19  11:01pm

Replies (0)
Review
148
Visit Webcam Hackers

Webcam Hackers
(0)

70.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Around 50 videos with updates pretty regularly (every 7 days it seems).
- The scenes are supposedly in HD (1250x720), but in my opinion even the HD looks grainy and rather poor quality (I guess it's all part of the webcam look, but to me they took it a step too far with some scenes looking as bad as a live cam strip show)
- As the title suggests this site is all about girls with webcams. Some of them strip in front of said webcam, some get fucked (sadly only one camera angle) and a few masturbate solo.
- They have the same high quality of models the rest of the site has and I believe all "amateurs" on here have scenes on other sites in the network.
- Most scenes have a bit of a story. A girl talks to her boyfriend and strips for him, a foreign exchange student has sex with her boyfriend, etc. Nothing too crazy, but it all stays in the same theme of a webcam hack and it's rather hot.
- Access to the network is included (tons and tons of good sex scenes here.)
Cons: - Like I mentioned above the videos although good resolution are still a bit on the grainy side and several of them have the webcam specific delay, which really makes the scene hard to get into. Also some scenes have serious color issues (when a girl's vagina looks purple something is seriously wrong)
- Some scenes are very short (5 minutes) and there are some scenes that feel like they belong together in one video but were split into two in order to make the site look bigger. (There is one Madison Ivy scene where she masturbates then another scene where has sex in the exact same place).
- The entire network needs a better way to preview videos. Right now their thumbnails are not very clear.
- Some girls are really not that interesting in solo action. There is one scene where a girl pulls on her labia and asks if we can tell which one she pulls on more. Titillating stuff indeed.
Bottom Line: Overall this site suffers from some limitations that are inherent in the type of content it's trying to produce. When you're trying to generate amateur content you pretty much force yourself to have rather poor camera work, only one angle and sometimes awkward interactions (like I mentioned above some girls do well alone with a camera and some are just weird)

Also they have a scene where two girls get into adult diapers and pretend to be sumo wrestlers. I guess that fits the site and it's rather funny, but I'm not sure if it's content that I want to pay 25 bucks for. I guess you have to look at this site as a bonus along with the much, much better sites like Massage Creep and 18 Years Old.

Aside from the sometimes questionable content I would have loved longer scenes. The average video is around 10 minutes with many running under that. Give the girls some more toys and more outfits and there should be no issue making longer videos.

So, we have rather poor action, short scenes and bad camerawork. So far the site manages to fail on every count possible. We do have several hot models, but why bother trying to watch the scenes here when a click away they are showing off with good lighting and multiple camera angles?

Now don't get me wrong, the premise of the site is good, we need more amateur content even if amateur means pornstar paid to masturbate in front of an expert camera crew. But for the love of God don't settle with actual webcam footage. That is never going to look good, it's just a waste of time and money.

Bottom line: the latest updates on here show improvement. Maybe it's just my hopeful optimism but the camera work seems cleaner and they are starting to focus on sex scenes as opposed to solo masturbation. Also the u8pdates are coming regularly and they seem to really want to push this amateur-like content, which is great.

More HD updates, more hot models and longer scenes and we should have a great site with a unique premise. (please no more adult diapers though... there is no need for that.)

P.S. The score reflects mu hope that the site will improve, right now I would not join this network just for the violation series of sites.

10-29-11  04:13pm

Replies (1)
Review
149
Visit White Teens Black Cocks

White Teens Black Cocks
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 146 scenes and this, along with Try Teens and Hardcore Youth seems to be one of the few sites the Teencoreclub network still seems to update periodically (about 1 scene a month) For more info on updates look at the Teencoreclub main page.
- Great looking girls and the majority of them do anal and deepthroat (older scenes have more regular, vaginal sex but for the past two years or so almost every scene has some anal action).
- Scenes look good with varied camera angles, good light, good combination of wide shots and close-ups
- The last two or three scenes feature a very brief interview and the girl playing with herself before the actual sex, otherwise the action is a bit formulaic with BJ, vagina sex, some anal, back to BJ and cumshot
- Some very very hot girls, including several that don't show up anywhere else on the network (or even on-line as far as I can tell)
- Ever scene has very good quality images, although no zip (I recommend using neodownloader to get the images)
Cons: - Just like the entire teencoreclub network this site suffers from simplistic webdesign, very strange update schedule and no search features.
- Hot models doing anal but pretty much everything else here is a con starting with the price and going all the way to lack of choices when it comes to downloads.
- This is the only site in the network that for me had strange download speeds. Sometimes it would max my internet connection, sometimes it would go as slow as 20kb or time-out. Not sure why or how.
- Price is pretty restrictive
Bottom Line: I always find it tough to review a site from the Teencore club network. On one hand they have incredible models often well before they show up anywhere else on the internet (I believe Isabella Clark and Aspen Richardsen started on this network) but at the same time everything else about the network is barely worth mentioning.

The web design is basic, reminding me of the first porn sites that were available on-line. Customer support is very basic, there are no extras worth mentioning, no different options when downloading a scene (you get WMV and that's it) The pictures don't have zip archives. There is no model search or even content type search. For example on this site about a third of the scenes are only vaginal sex, but there is no way to filter them out.

The list of complaints can go on and on, but in the end this is a network that has great looking girls and not much else going on for it. Still I find myself coming back for them again and again for brief periods of time. I use image grabbers to get all the images and periodically download the updates but in all honesty I wouldn't stay a member for long periods of times.

Now that being said about the network itself I have a few comments on this site in particular.

The scenes here seem to run a bit longer than the rest of the network, most of them 30 minutes or a bit more. The angles of the action seem more varied here and the guy goes from anal to vaginal, back to anal pretty often in many different positions. In fact I'd say this is the most varied site on the whole network, aside from HardcoreYouth (which is compete different in vibe and more similar to firstanalquest or 21 sextury).

Another interesting aspect for me was that many of the scenes seem more realistic with some the girls struggling to accept the male model into their buts. Maybe they film the girls first on this site or the guy is significantly bigger than they experienced before but there are not many massive gapes here, something I was actually pretty pleased with.

Overall, I'd recommend this network to anyone who hasn't been a member before and enjoys young girls doing real hardcore stuff. Try it for a month or two, get all the DRM free content you can get and wait a few months until they get some new content then pay them another visit if you like their type of content.

05-20-12  05:47pm

Replies (0)
Review
150
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(0)

79.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Over 1600 casting scenes (interview with the girl and softcore stripping), 594 Hardcore scenes (about half are actual sex scenes and half are casting+sex) and 146 behind the scenes videos.

- Around 636 casting photo sets (softcore stuff) and another 156 hardcore photo sets. Each set only has around 20 images or less, but they are available as zip archives and are pretty high quality at around 3000x4000

- Older content is lower quality and oftentimes just a few minutes long (for the casting and BTS, hardcore scenes are all around 25-30 min) However most sex scenes are available at 720x520 with most stuff from the last year or so as high as 1920x1080.

- Various options for downloading a scene, and very fast servers. No more time-outs or random log-outs when I set up a long list of downloads (see my negative comment from last year)

- A few improved ways of navigating the site (you can select to see only girls with sex and you can filter the girl's nationality)

- Hot models!
Cons: - While navigation improved in certain areas it could still use a better search function (right now the search bar is basically useless and there is no category search for anal, threesome etc)

- While you can filter the girls by nationality a better filter would have been language of casting interview since many of the older ones are in French.

- All the casting+hardcore scenes feature Pierre having sex with the girl while filmed by a static camera... a bit disappointing even compared to the two or three cameras used by Backroomcastingcouch or Exploited college girls.

- Updates are a bit random. While we get daily updates they are mostly casting videos. I'd say some months we get two or three hardcore scenes, some months 6-7. A lot of the casting scenes feature very broken English and little nudity.

- The site advertises heavily for Wakeupnfuck, Pierre's other site which cost another 40 bucks or so.

- Some content is available on other sites
Bottom Line: Pierre Woodman was probably the first guy to do casting videos with innocent looking girls he then convinced to do DPs and Anal. He worked for a ton of big name porn studios and has a huge library of casting videos and Behind the stage videos a lot of which are fascinating to watch.

There is nothing quite like seeing a girl be shy when first interviewed, no make up, no fancy clothes, just a girl "next door" hesitant about the porn world. Except you also get to see her doing a crazy scene with three guys a few minutes later. The appeal of Woodman is this transformation from regular girls to pornstars and this site is great for that. You get to see over 1500 casting scenes and roughly a third of those girls go on and have hardcore sex on camera. For many of them you can even use the forum and ask Pierre about juicy stories or details (one hesitant girl didn't do porn shots but hung out with the crew and had sex with them in between shooting. Another girl had her very first sex with Pierre... the stories go on and on and while they may be a bit exaggerated they add a certain Risque flavor to the videos.)

Once you consider that the girls are for the most part incredibly hot European models and almost all scenes on the site involve anal and/ or DP (even some rare double anal if you look around closely) the site is very interesting.

Another bonus (I already mentioned a bit) is the forum interaction where Pierre answers questions and tells stories about the girls. It's frustrating to hear how many of the castings also have a hardcore scene, but Pierre can't release it because the girl didn't sign a proper contract :P

Unfortunately there are some downsides too. First of all a lot of the older interviews are in French and even the more recent ones don't have very good English. I really wish they would use subtitles more often.

The Forum also uses a lot of French and there are constant promises that we'll see an update with a particular girl that does a casting, but her Hardcore or BTS video never goes up. In fact since I last joined Pierre added only a handful of BTS videos, which is really a shame as many of them are very interesting.

Speaking of updates a lot of new scenes are going to Wakeupnfuck which is a sister site focused on POV scenes where Pierre has sex with very hot models. However membership to Woodmancastingx won't even get you a discount on Wakeupnfuck. In fact the rather expensive membership here won't give you any kind of bonus features. (A while back I think there was talk of having live shows but after a few of those no more updates)

The site navigation could also use some improvement. There is a section for updates where you can see the different types of videos and there is a section for girls where you can filter by nationality and girls who have sex, but there is no way to filter a specific category of sex and
sometimes links are wrong or a girl is featured twice in the line-up. Basically the site needs a bit of re-design.

I'd also like to note that a lot of the older content here is available through Pornstarnetwork and one nice feature on Pornstarnetwork is that they put the casting and the hardcore scene in one video so you can easily see the interview then skip a few minutes and see the girl having sex. The way the site is organized now that would be impractical, but I'd like some way to queue movies.

Another frustrating aspect of the site is that whenever you click on a video the page loads and the scene starts playing immediately. This is a pain if you just want to download a bunch of videos and don't care about streaming, but I guess it might be a personal preference so I won't take too many points off. Previewing a scene could also be more user friendly...

On one hand I'm glad to see more hardcore videos than before and some easier navigation options on the other hand the price of the site is still very high and the fact that Wakeupnfuck is not included in the price is a disappointment. The forum is full of promises that more hardcore or at least BTS will be released soon but in the meantime it feels a bit strange that after almost a year absence I discovered very little new here.

Bottom Line: If you really love Pierre's stuff and want more of his stuff the site is for you if not Backroomcastingcouch or Exploitedcollegegirls might be a better fit. As it stands right now, without better browsing tools, without some sort of discount or membership to Bonus sites this is a strong 79 very close to 80.

07-08-12  05:47pm

Replies (6)

Shown : 126-150 of 155 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.36 seconds.