| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
FTV Girls
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The women are beautiful, and the site does a decent job giving us a glimpse of their personalities, even if the scenes are, at times, contrived. I like that some of the scenes include the model clothed -- I enjoy seeing how the models look dressed up ... what they choose to wear, etc. |
| Cons: |
I use a Mac, and I can't view the movies until I download them fully, then play. I'd much rather view them without downloading, but I haven't been able to figure out how to do that. Downloads aren't terribly speedy either. |
| Bottom Line: |
Very well done. Erotic. One of the best sites I've seen for this type of content. I'm not into extreme insertions, so I like that I can pick and choose the videos I wish to view. I've only been a member a few days, but I've watched several scenes with several models, and I've yet to be disappointed.
Follow-Up:
After a three weeks on this site, I became rather fatigued with it. The updates weren't frequent enough, and the girls not captivating enough. I canceled my account and joined Nubiles, which, at least for the time being, is a better site with more options (and some of the same girls).
Most of what I said in my original review still stands, but the site had, at least for me, a short shelf life. |
|
07-30-07 09:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
52
|
FTV Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Huge Archive
Steady Player
Easy Navigation
Advanced Tagging System
Category Selections |
| Cons: |
Bad Download Features
Shoots are not natural
Unnecessarily Split Video Shoots |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV Girls is a very old and a very good amateur porn site. They have been around since 2002. They have a huge archive to get lost into.
Coming from their name First Time Videos, you will find a lot of first-time shoots. There is an explanation for each model and also for shoots.
They have as much as photos as they have videos, and they are beautifully shot.
Even though they have a huge archive, and they did not need to, they split the shots into unnecessary number of scenes and you can only download the videos scene by scene.
They are one of the best amateur sites out there, but when it comes to naturality, they are not good at it. They have beautiful models, shots are beautiful, but not natural. Their great photo archive covers this negative aspect though. You may like their photos more.
Their tagging system is pretty advanced in addition to be able to select the videos from categories. Great archive comes with great selection and they do have it.
They are $30 a month. They have a huge archive so the price is worth it, but downloading system sucks.
They do a very good job with explanations of shoots. It is more than satisfactory. Public Nudity and Masturbation Videos are their main categories. Also, they have Extreme and Fetish Categories. Always different locations of shootings is another positive feature. |
|
02-20-20 08:51am
Replies (1)
|
Review
53
|
FTV Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Cute girls on their first time in first adult experience
Excellent Videos/pics
Some top names in adult have first scenes here
good navigation
Most in HD with newest available in 4k Older material is of course in Sd)
Good download speeds with no limit and available in multiple formats. |
| Cons: |
Dated site design
No tag search
photo shoots could be longer
Stand alone site with no bonus sites included |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site a few years ago and am a repeat customer. Site was still the same but that is a minor con as it is still functional. A tag/category or keyword search would be awesome. I went page by page looking through all the models, this is very mush recommended as some big names started here and are under either their real names or first alias. Some are listed as "now pornstar or glamour model (name)" But most of the ones I did recognized weren't updated.
The content is great. Some very shy new comers appearing for their first time ever. Some went on to become pornstars so these are their real first experiences in front of a camera. Examples: Nina North, Goldie Glock(Ortiz), Uma Jolie, Brittany Bliss, And Moka Mora started here.
The Pics look great but wish the photo shoots were a bit longer, but being amateurs they most likely get more nervous and start shutting down if it gets too long. The videos are just amazing! Some of the public nudity is just down right brazen! Goldie Ortiz (Here known as Violet) walks out buckass naked onto an occupied tennis court! The masturbation videos are pretty amazing too, ranging from shy newbs to girls wanting to explore their own limits with various toys and veggies.
Final thoughts: As this site has been around for almost 2 decades their older stuff is of course in sd. Whats there is there, I don't think anything shot on tape can be remastered.
Bottom line: I would most definitely recommend at least a months membership to this site if only to see the now famous pornstars first scenes. Also the just flat out innocence of the one and done girls trying something new. |
|
12-17-18 05:52am
Replies (1)
|
Review
54
|
FTV Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Beautiful women
- Many amateurs and ‘first-timers’
- An opportunity to see some porn stars ‘before they were stars’
- Newer files have an HD option
- Decent download speeds
- Huge site, with apparently regular updates
- Public nudity / exhibitionism
Please note - my intention is to review only the public nudity part of this site - there are many other general reviews that cover the site more completely |
| Cons: |
- The set-ups are all essentially the same – gets repetitive
- Scenes are broken up into several files
- Every file opens with a brief title screen which is VERY annoying when linking multiple files
- Expensive
- Very little variety in the type of model (not a con if you like this type of model though) |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my first review of a site that I probably shouldn’t have joined, but I’ll be objective. I have no real interest in solo-girl masturbation sites. All my other reviews are of sites that I had an interest in. The reason I joined was for the advertised public nudity. My review will focus primarily on that for anyone who has the same interest.
As other reviewers have noted, there is a lack of variety with the models. For people like me who like FTV Girls’ taste in models, this isn’t an issue, but for those who like some variety this may be a negative. There is a lack of variety is scene set-up too. Most models start outside with a little flashing and then move indoors for some masturbation. Some models are more playful and do more outdoor flashing and some outdoor masturbation too.
My reason for joining FTV Girls was because it appeared that there was a lot of public nudity. This is an under-served niche and though the site was not something I’d join otherwise, I joined to see the public stuff.
The public stuff is certainly there in quantity. Most of the models do some public flashing. As a public nudity site (and I realize that this isn’t specifically such) this is pretty tame, but well within industry norms for U.S. sites. Obviously all the models will have differing levels of daring when it comes to public nudity. A few are quite daring, a few won’t do it, and the majority do some. For most models, the extent of their public flashing isn’t all that public – they dress in skimpy clothes and flash for the camera on side streets and empty parks. A few – very few – are as daring as the best of the public nudity sites on the web.
Many of the public nudity scenes are shot in the same area, which might lead one to presume that they are staged and have the support of the property owners. If you presume that, please take note of the webmaster’s comments below: these scenes are not staged. In my opinion, having the outdoor scenes as spontaneous as this is the essence of a good public nudity site.
One thing that would normally be a big negative for me is actually a positive here. The scenes are broken down into several smaller files. I normally despise that, but if all you’re looking for is the public stuff, that works out in your favor. One added thing that is DEFINITELY a negative is that at the beginning of every file there is a title screen. When you link several clips the action gets interrupted by a two-second title screen every few minutes. The site really needs to think about fixing this. Surely a watermark is enough to identify your material.
If you’re a fan of public nudity and have run through the sites that specialize in that, FTV Girls is worth a look. There is a lot of material here, and it is well done too. Public nudity (done in the U.S.) isn’t well served, and FTV Girls adds some quality stuff to the available material. |
|
12-31-09 09:01am
Replies (5)
|
Review
55
|
FTV Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+Each girl has a boatload of content. A lot of videos, a lot of pictures. Each page has the girl's measurements and other data.
+Two very high quality download options - DivX and WMV (640x480)
+Except for the FTV image that lasts 2 seconds at the start of each video, there are no watermarks.
+The interviews are rather fun to listen to.
+Image sets downloadable as ZIP's.
+Complete model directory with description of what type of content is offered for the girl, size of the videos, and number of pics available.
+Sneak peek page to see what upcoming updates will be.
+Girl-girl updates are separate from all the solo content.
+Newer content is available in HD 720p.
+If there is more than one set of content for a girl then the pages will link to each other - very nice.
+Site is super fast as are the downloads.
+Friendly to Europeans, cheaper to buy from EU Direct Pay (20.31EUR = $26.52 at 1EUR=$1.306 today)
+100% original content |
| Cons: |
-Weak update schedule (1girl/wk)
-Pictures watermarked (although subtly)
-Newer updates require secondary login (only once though)
-Majority of content is all solo material (sans the separate girl-girl content which smaller in size) and mostly softcore (but there are masturbation videos)
-All movies are split file.
-Girl-girl movies not updated as frequently as solo material (looks like 1 update per month)
-Girls don't have last names, so like Karups and other sites, you get girls named with numbers (Andrea, Andrea 2, Andrea 3, etc.)
-Bonus content is nothing more than some more content that could otherwise be featured as future updates (besides the fact that they are hosted on the FTV domain)
-There are other FTV owned sites (DanielleFTV) but they are not included with membership.
-No site search.
-What do the colored bars next to each girl mean? Intensity???
-Expensive, $30/mo - no special from TBP, and no multi-month deal. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm not going to say the site is lacking, quite the contrary, but the site is pretty straightforward and doesn't make it hard at all to find all their content, so there isn't much to complain or boast about with regards to the site.
The content is super high quality. Be it the videos or the photos, you will not be disappointed nor will you be unable to enjoy it. Obviously if you don't fancy softcore or solo masturbation, you will be out of place. There is no boy/girl content (unless you consider the guy off screen conducting interviews b/g). The girl/girl content is OK, but pornstar-quality lesbian content is never that good when you compare it to true amateur lesbian content, and FTV lesbian content is pornstar-quality. This is not to say the content is bad, it just is not what some people are looking for.
Overall it is a good site, but the biggest problem I have is that there is only 1 update per week, for mostly solo content, at a costly $30/mo. Yikes!
I can understand the update schedule especially if they are putting a lot of effort into producing one girl's worth of updates per week, and I can understand the focus (hey every site has their calling card), but $30/mo with NO available discounts in any shape or fashion? Urrrrrr... Make it cheaper per month ($10-$15/mo...because this is all I think it is worth) and you have a 90+ rated site in my book. |
|
02-03-09 10:42pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
56
|
FTV Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
*A ton of content
*Lots of attractive women
*A lot of videos usually following a pattern of themes (primary focus of the site)
*Thumbnail images (vid-cap) at regular intervals to preview the clips. (can be enlarged to full resolution)
*Photo sets with every update - professional quality (natural lighting) - this isn't studio style stuff, though.
*Female masturbation to usually real orgasms.
*Some bizarre insertions (if you're into that) - extra large toys, champagne bottles, baseball bats, etc.
*Sets offer plenty of material in usually a variety of locations (2-3 locations per set).
*Public masturbation and nudity - sometimes high risk locations (they do get caught and thrown out sometimes)
*Variety of video resolutions (real High Definition started in December)
*Many of the models are known and popular porn stars or ladies who have since become popular porn stars.
*There is a section devoted to Girl-Girl shoots (best part of the site) |
| Cons: |
*Mostly solo content.
*Not every model shoots video.
*Not every model goes into extra-curricular activities (masturbation public or private, public nudity, etc)
*Definitely on the pricey side.
*Can get repetitive.
*No hardcore at all.
*File names for videos are terrible. (1a, 2a, 3a - requires more effort when saving since you have to rename them or create individual folders for each model & shoot)
*Since the photo shoots aren't studio style - the quality of the shots really depends on the skill of the photographer and how lucky they get with the lighting. Pretty much a best effort given the situation and location.
*Mega-size section for photo sets are almost all just a zip file so you have to commit to the entire download.
*Mega-size photo sets are completely untouched - these are jpgs of exactly what comes out of the camera's memory card - so it's not exactly like the ones in the preview. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a fantastic video site that features very attractive women doing as much extreme solo subject matter as the videographer can get them to do. So it can range from simple nudity & interviews to masturbation, fisting, extreme insertions, girl/girl action and fetish material. There is no hardcore action or boy/girl, but I never missed it. Usually things are very personal/intimate - more so than any other site I've found.
There is a general theme to the majority of the sets. The videographer definitely has favorite places (both public and in the "FTV House") to do shoots, but he tries to mix things up as much as possible to try to keep things fresh. And for all of the really popular models, he takes them to Hawaii.
The site is organized very well. Everything is accessible from the main page and the entire catalog is split into 3 sections of the alphabet except for the girl-girl stuff which is in its own section.
There is a system set up with descriptions so you can see what might be worth your time and what might not. They identify photo-only shoots and use a color coding system to identify standard masturbation shoots (yellow) and extreme shoots (red).
I signed up for 3 months and I needed it. Someone with a higher speed connection could likely leech everything in a month, though, but there is a daily cap of 25GB*(littlejoe). I wouldn't stay subscribed year-round, though. Maybe once a year for me to get the updates, but it's definitely worth resubscribing. |
|
01-26-08 01:32am
Replies (7)
|
Rating
57
|
FTV Girls
(0)
85.0
|
No Review.
|
07-23-07 04:14am
|
Rating
58
|
FTV Girls
(0)
85.0
|
No Review.
|
05-08-07 02:32am
|
Review
59
|
FTV Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots....and lots of gorgeous models.
Lots of variety including outdoor/voyeur stuff - if that floats yer boat.
One of THE best videos I've seen of Leah - "we are not worthy !" Luv..... worth the entry fee on its own. |
| Cons: |
Dowload speeds not too great.
Only around 1/3 of the vids have the "higher" 2000kbps bitrate - although this will presumably increase as new vids are added.
Photos a little sparse and not great quality on the whole.
Worth joining for the variety, but better teen sites are available as first choices. |
| Bottom Line: |
Worth joining for the variety, but better teen sites are available as first choices. |
|
03-27-07 10:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
60
|
FTV Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Tons of models. Professional site. Easy navigations. Whats better then watching a nice looking girl get herself off? Thats what this place has to offer. |
| Cons: |
scenarios way off. Too artsy. Needs to tone down a little, simple is better. FTV toy? Why? Personally I like to see sincere solo masturbation. I like to see the model get herself off....not just shove whatever is available in her snatch. |
| Bottom Line: |
They have a lot going for them. Tone it down a little. Maybe have the model do her solo on a bed instead of anywhere else. Dont be afraid of getting the snatch in view when shes cumming and you should have something big. |
|
03-01-07 09:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
61
|
FTV Girls
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A long-running site that is a good place to start as a porn collector.
- 1920x1080 on the videos over the last 3 years
- Pictures come zipped
- Weekly update could be considered a con
- They do continuously get amateur models in their first or at least close to their first shoots
- Good download speeds, around 90% of my max download speed. |
| Cons: |
- My biggest gripe is with the pictures. I never understood the purpose of having a "superpic" section where the webmaster decides to put 3000 high end and 4000 high end zips for his favorite sets. These are not that often and the vast majority of sets are only 1600 high end.
- Has been in a slow decline, could be because I've joined it once or twice a year, will further in BL.
- That one weekly update just isn't enough and will further this as well.
- No real reason to complain about it since they do separate the videos into parts based on the action, but it's becoming a con to me not to be able to download full scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV has had its really strong years. If you've never joined the site would score higher than I'm scoring it, but I just can't give it a higher score based on my most recent join.
I'll start by saying I had everything I wanted from the site up until March 2011's updates. I have always liked their style of photography and most of the videos as well and have kept those on an external. I probably wouldn't have rejoined if not for a promo that dropped the price nearly in half. Even then, as a returning member, I'm not for sure I feel like I got my money's worth. For this whole membership, I downloaded and will keep:
14 models, videos and pictures.
I'm sure the everyone has different tastes rule applies here, but only 14 models appealing to me out of 70-75 since my last membership just isn't good, at least not for me. In comparison, I have over 200 FTV models, so you can see how it has declined for me. I would normally find 30-40 per year I liked, this time it was 14 in 20 months.
It's possible it could be more than just the model's not appealing to me. The scenes, similar to how they have always been, have several videos for each model being more playful and acting silly than being nude. Maybe I'm just getting older and find those more irritating than cute? So you can decide on that one. If you like that style of porn you can disregard my negativity towards it.
The picture size is a no longer an excuse situation. Saying we're going to post 3000 or 4000 high end resolution photos on our (FTV) favorite sets and make the other 90% or higher only 1600 high end is unacceptable to me. You're catering to members not your own taste or maybe I'm wrong on that.
What this equals for me is a site that isn't appealing to me with as many models. Then you just get one update per week with a 1/5 chance I'm going to even like that model, only 4 updates per month, so my 1/5 chance isn't looking so good. A premium price if you join it without a promo, only to find out you only get the highest resolution photos for the sets they pick to do those high resolution ones on. Videos broken up into parts and the scroll like mad navigation, all of which are minor problems by themselves, but when added together make for a big problem. Something has to give. Either the price goes down or more updates or added or you give full scene downloads or you give 3000x4000 resolution pictures on all sets. Or be daring, give them all for the premium price and I won't bitch about the price.
Having said all this, I won't throw FTV completely under the bus, so to speak. They have their strengths. You will see pornstars you know of, but most of their sets were shot early in the model's career. You do get to see a different side of the models than on nearly all other sites. And when they do it, you get some of the best exhibitionism content available. If you've never joined it, I would give it one of my highest recommendations for a first time membership. You also will see some models you've never seen before and probably won't see them ever again. The video quality is as crystal clear in 1920x1080 as any 1080p porn videos I've seen. I think that just hurts the lower resolution photos since it's obvious they have the ability to shoot extremely high quality video. And the superpics section ends up becoming more of a poke from them to say, "we could be giving you these resolution photos on every set". May not be their intentions, but it sure seems that way.
I also don't care for the girl/girl content which has become more common. This just goes into a whole feeling of, there are lesbian sex sites out there that do it better. I didn't list this in cons though since it's no worse than having a pretty girl do cartwheels for 5 minutes. I do get the feeling and have had the feeling before that as a member, you're going to get content based on what the webmaster likes or has fetishes for and still feel that way. I would like to see more variation in the models too. There has never been a maximum age limit on the models and they used to shoot more mid to late 20s models. It now seems like a purely teen site in the newer updates.
As I'm leading to recommending it, there has to be some stipulations added here. If you've never been a member or have only been a member once or twice, it's still a definite join and recommendation. If you're like me and have the majority of the archive and are only missing the last year or so, look at the previews and decide if enough of the models would appeal to you. I should have, but I was shocked to find a promo through, I think Twistys, that I just jumped on the deal before checking out the newer updates. I'm running out of room, but will add a comment about what seems to be a slightly different version of their site, not for sure if it's a mobile version or if it's a new format since the promo I used sent me to it instead of the regular site. |
|
12-03-12 01:00pm
Replies (11)
|
Review
62
|
FTV Girls
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Both photographic and video images are clear. Can't argue with high resolution anything.
-Good looking models, no matter where you come from or where you are going, they are good looking.
-Interesting out and about the town shoots. |
| Cons: |
-Though the photos are quality, they are too few and way, way too small. They offer a febble large size grab-bag of some sets, but your guess is as good as mine as to what you get.
-Like some half-ass minor site they offer only one video format choice. Are they getting kickbacks, a member of a club, or do they just not care. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV has been a good site a while, in fact, it was a trend setter when it started. Not any more. They offer no choices for their members from their photos to their video formats, Seems if you're serious about what you offer, it doesn't take much to give the sizes and varied formats the public wants. Maybe FTV isn't that serious. It's still a good site in the marketplace, but doesn't seem to be moving forward.
If you like small clear photos and presently standard videos in one format, then you'll be happy here. Otherwise, hit and run or wait. |
|
01-25-07 11:39am
Replies (0)
|
Review
63
|
FTV Girls
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Consistent. Not much has changed since I was a member 2 years ago.
-The girls. If you like sexy white chicks that run the gamut from avg. to gorgeous, you'll get something out of FTV. (they have an exotic non-white girl here and there).
-Girls inserting large objects. One unique aspects of FTV is their penchant for having the girls stick massive vegetables and/or fruits inside them. Once in a while they'll shove a hand or fist in there for good measure.
-I was able to download zipfiles of pics rather quickly.
-Lots of hot videos of girls masturbating.
-Little synopsis of the scene and the director describes shooting with the model. |
| Cons: |
-The layout is a bit cumbersome. Also, visually they could reconfigure the site so it's more intuitive to navigate instead of just scrolling down...FOREVER.
-The girls' names! It seems more often than not FTV always has the names of the girls listed differently than what they are everywhere else. This is probably a testament to their ability to locate the newest, hottest girls. However, it's a pain in the butt to us pic collectors who would like to organize all of our pics by model. Thankfully there are unaffiliated blogs on the web that list girls by their FTV name AND their porn names.
-The price. They need to lower that price a bit. In my opinion this is good for once every two years but for less than half the price I can get better content.
-The video content meanders a bit. and I'm not a big fan of how they edit by splicing right in the middle of a scene so there's a slight jump in the audio and video. |
| Bottom Line: |
I seem to join this site every 2 years or so. I like FTV a lot, but for what it is, they should be commanding a subscription rate of $19.99. Even then, I think that's a bit too high. I give it an 83 because it is solidly a VERY GOOD site. However, there are solo glamor-shot type sites that in my opinion are slightly better, and update more frequently. With my latest stint with FTV coming to a conclusion in a matter of days, I definitely enjoyed my subscription this time around...see you in another two years FTV, maybe. |
|
12-17-11 03:43pm
Replies (9)
|
Review
64
|
FTV Girls
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
HD videos look great, maybe best i've seen.
this is my 2nd or 3rd membership over the past few years..i don't remember there being hardcore before, in any case a nice addition. women are generally very attractive..more ethnic women would be nice. the camera-man is rarely involved. by in-large the women are enjoying themselves. i do like it when the camera-man asks about sexual history.. likes and dis-likes. |
| Cons: |
as said more ethnic women. tough to think of any real negatives. price is high relative to other sites but most other sites are not this good. |
| Bottom Line: |
a great site, will continue to return |
|
02-08-11 02:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
65
|
FTV Girls
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Amazing models. Young girls with a lot of bubble butts. Large archive. |
| Cons: |
Older photo shoots lacking. As a photo lover not a lot of imagination used here and the always stressing of insertion at the end is just plain lazy. |
| Bottom Line: |
I prefer a softcore site more explicit then the excellent Only Tease (like Digital Desire) but I easily prefer Only Tease and their sister sites to FTV girls. I'm not a fan of glamour videos so I'm just talking about photos and I grow weary of the last third of the shoot devoted to uninspired insertion pics that also suffer from very little variation to the previous photo. The best looking young girls with great asses are for the most part semi-wasted. |
|
04-17-17 05:15am
Replies (2)
|
Rating
66
|
FTV Girls
(0)
82.0
|
No Review.
|
02-09-08 08:50pm
|
Review
67
|
FTV Girls
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A Lot Of Material
- Hi Res Photos
- Zip Files
- Many Videos
- Decent DL Speed |
| Cons: |
- Much Of The Material Is Somewhat Boring
- NO Hardcore
- Infrequent Updating |
| Bottom Line: |
After thumbing through their extensive preview, I was anxious to see the site. I was somewhat disappointed. It's a very attractive site, and easy to navigate. It does have an awful lot of material, photos and videos. But, something is missing. It's not exciting. A bit bland. Some of the sets seem to be nudity optional! Others, the old statue posing. There is no hardcore. That would be fine if the material was highly erotic, but most of it is not. I guess if you never saw a girl nude before, it would be. But for jaded porn surfers, nah! It's not that there isn't good material here, there is, but you have to search for it. The photos are hi-res, at the lower end of the scale (1200px), and zipped for convenience. They do have a page of larger sized photos (2000x3000), but just 1 page.The videos are offered in wmv (640x480), and divx (360x240). Being First Time Videos, the girls are basically presented as the archetypal "girl next door". I don't know about your neighborhood, but the girls nowadays are a little more wild than those presented here! |
|
09-30-07 04:08am
Replies (9)
|
Review
68
|
FTV Girls
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-The website is tidy and is easy to navigate.
-You can take a ‘free tour’ of the website which gives you access to some photos and sample videos before committing to membership, which is $29.95 per month, or $99.95 for 5 months.
-You can rate and add the shoots to your favourites, and comment on the shoots.
-High quality, professionally shot picture galleries accompany all shoots. The photo galleries are nicely laid out, and you can flick through each photo and there is the option to see full size and zoomed image.
-Each shoot has letters tagged on it, for example O means real orgasm, 1st means first time shoot, BB means busty, Fet means fetish, etc. Once you learn these tags, it is easy to browse to find what you want to see.
-Each shoot has an in-depth detailed description of what happens in the scene (videographers comments). It’s nice to read what the models are like, and I like that they tell you what to expect in a sexy way. |
| Cons: |
-The website looks a little outdated in style.
-When buying membership there is a small checked box also subscribing you to ftv milfs.
-No advanced search options. You can only search by model name, use the search bar at the top, or click on tags that appear on the shoots.
-Each shoot is broken into several videos (clips) instead of one longer video. The shoot appears to be shot throughout a day, and each clip is an ‘episode’, that is filmed in a different outfit, room, with different toy or position. This may be a ‘pro’ for some, but it’s a ‘con’ for me.
-The camera work is not professional, when it moves it makes noises and jitters. But it doesn’t move often.
-Some models are not ‘all natural’, and many wear make up, which doesn’t do it for me.
-There are not many GG shoots, and no group shoots.
-Sometimes there is too much dialogue with the videographer. |
| Bottom Line: |
Ftvgirls.com is a site that features many models in their first time on camera. The shoots are usually quite long, and contain several ‘clips’, which are like episodes of the shoot day, often including a video clip of the photoshoot. Vagina and ass spreading closeups are frequently filmed at the end of a clip.
As the models are very amateur, it is endearing to see how they interact on camera, and I like that they talk about what happens, including mistakes. They have a genuinity that is sexy. I love seeing their different personalities, and finding what works for one model is quite different for another. I saw some clips where models were trying things for the first time, eg fisting, and mfvgirls has an extensive sex toy collection, which the models are able to explore.
Although I enjoyed that there was dialogue with the videographer, and there was a relaxedness about the conversations, sometimes it was a turn off when the videographer would interrupt the scene. I would rather the models get lost in the moment and for things to stop or change because it felt natural. Many of the shoots seemed directed by the videographer, and the shoots I enjoyed the most were the undirected ones. In a clip, generally the model/s just do one thing in one position eg. masturbate with vibrator lying on back. It felt like things were ‘decided on’ before shooting the clip, and the models did no more than that. This is not to say that the models weren’t having a good time. Sometimes the models still tried (pre-planned) new things, and often the clips end in orgasm. However, this is a difference from other websites I frequent as I prefer a more fluid scene where models naturally move between different desires, instead of stopping and starting. |
|
06-14-19 05:30am
Replies (5)
|
Review
69
|
FTV Girls
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Great video quality and options
Decent pictures
No download limit
Exclusive content
Attractive models |
| Cons: |
Not a lot of variety
Slow updates
Not much direction to the videos |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV Girls is a site that focuses on young, thin, and attractive models.
With a couple of minor exceptions all videos are solo scenes that tend to fall into either masturbation or exhibition categories. The videos are of high quality but I found myself getting bored of this site much faster than most, but tastes will vary on this.
I think the reason why I didn't like the site as much as I thought I would was because there doesn't appear that any real direction is given to the models. Basically the "director" doing the filming places the girl somewhere and just lets her do whatever she feels like. Sometimes this works out but other times it ends up being kind of boring.
There is also always a lot of talking going on between the director and model which you may or may not like. There's not a lot of variety to the model or scene type so you need to really like both.
One thing I did find interesting is that occasionally some of the models performed dance routines. I haven't really seen that done before on other sites so I thought that was kind of novel.
The layout of the site is pretty well done. The scenes are pretty well tagged and organized. The shoots are cut up into small clips of maybe 4-11 minutes. Normally I'd dislike this and want a single complete video but for this site I actually really appreciated being able to pick and choose what parts to see and what ones to skip.
Download speeds were always good and DL managers work fine.
If you like the content there's a good amount of it but I feel the one update a week is too infrequent. It seems to be a one man show so perhaps that's simply the volume one person can handle. I do recommend a join but can't say that I'd want to be a recurring member.
I don't regret my membership but I didn't like it as much as I thought I would and got tired of the site very quickly. It is worth noting though that I generally prefer more hardcore sites and I'm sure that did impact my feelings about this site. |
|
03-12-14 05:24pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
70
|
FTV Girls
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Huge Collection.
- HD option for videos available.
- ZIP download option for photosets.
- Hot models.
- Multiple download formats for videos.
- No DRM videos protection.
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
- Good website design.
- Frequent updates. |
| Cons: |
- Expensive.
- Navigation needs improvement.
- Old content's quality is average.
- Download limit (25 Gb/day).
- No hardcore content.
- Updates could be faster.
- Not enough bonus content offered. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV Girls is a good babes adult website that surely needs improvements.
First of all, it's current collection is huge at the moment with lots of models to choose from but please notice that there is NO hardcore content offered.
Videos (new ones) can be downloaded in two formats (.wmv and .DivX), HD (.wmv 8000kb/sec) is available which is totally awesome. Photosets can be downloaded in ZIP format and new ones quality is excellent.
There is no DRM videos protection but there is a daily download limit of 25 Gp. Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
Website design is cool but there navigation needs lots of improvement because there is no search feature just a models name list and site's collection seems chaotic. In general lines, models are very hot.
Monthly subscription price is expensive (30 USD) and there is no trial feature. Bonus content is tiny as it contains only a few scenes.
Site updates weekly and content is daited. Updates could come faster, at my opinion.
In conclusion, if you are into such content you can try this one. Recommended. |
|
05-01-09 04:44am
Replies (4)
|
Review
71
|
FTV Girls
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Bill through CCBill.
-Mostly extremely attractive girls.
-Large website. Presently has 380 girls, 658,500+ MB of video, and 106,000+ photos.
-Updates weekly. This is fine for such a large site. I don't expect several updates a day as these are not copied from an archive of DVD's.
-All videos exclusively shot for the site. |
| Cons: |
-Close to zero ethnic diversity. Of the 380 girls, I found only three Asian and three Black. A lot of variety as long as all you want are white girls.
-No variety as to age. I did not find one model over 25. If there are please, let me know.
-A few are short or tall, but I saw no other variety as to body type. None I could find are even remotely out of the norm of slim and thin. There is a little variety as to breast size, but most are small breasted.
-While not a glamour model site, not exactly not glamour either. The girls are nicely made up, but few seem to be completely natural. It felt to me that the girls are made to look how the site wants them to look. Since the site sells itself as ordinary girls, I feel this is a negative. I was expecting girls who looked more like real amateurs. Too professional and artificial.
-Most videos are only very poor quality Divx or 680x420 WMV. Adequate but not the greatest quality. Since January 2008 the site is updating with true HD. |
| Bottom Line: |
Considering how many reviews as well as the number of exceptionally high scores, I was rather disappointed. Many of the videos were not of the best quality and the videos are not easily downloaded. Each girl has a page or pages of her. On each page there are usually four videos. There is no way to download all four, so you have to do this individually. Every video on the page is labelled by number, so the next page or the next girl has the same number as the last page. You have to download individually and then change the file name. Otherwise you have files by number only and after downloading have a completely disorganized mess to sort through. The search is only by date or model name, so it is difficult to find what you want if say, you want to see all the public nudity videos. Are they seriously expecting me to go through 380 models, and some have multiple pages, to search? The types of videos are of several types-public nudity, solo nude scenes and masturbation. Most of the videos are masturbation; probably at least half. I am mostly into the public nudity and solo nude scenes and finding good quality scenes to download is unnecessarily difficult and time consuming. The public nude scenes are fairly tame in my opinion, and lack the fun and spontaneity of, for example Publicflash.com. The nude scenes are ok, comparable to the ATK sites videos. The masturbation scenes had a lot of dildo use, fingering, as well as fisting, not my taste. You often hear the photographer in the background. Not intrusive or terribly annoying, but not spontaneous either. Comparable to, but not worse than Simonscans.com or Mattsmodels.com in this regard. Overall, a lot of attractive girls, a big site, some HD videos, a lot of inadequate quality videos, some interesting masturbation scenes, and too much glamour posed by the numbers model photos and videos. Many times I had the feeling the site had no genuine erotic passion and lacked a feeling of fun. However I cannot deny this is a good site for those who like this kind of material because it is so large. |
|
03-08-09 09:25am
Replies (12)
|
Review
72
|
FTV Girls
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Extremely attractive women
Lots of pictures and movies
Decent download speeds |
| Cons: |
Solo. masturbation action only |
| Bottom Line: |
A decent site, well worth checking out, if only for the cost one months subscription |
|
02-21-07 08:12am
Replies (2)
|
Review
73
|
FTV Girls
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Tons of very attractive models.
The new Super HD videos are crystal clear with
a size of 1440x1080 and a total bitrate of 8000 kbps.
Picture sets are zipped. |
| Cons: |
Older videos (even as recent as 2007 and 2006) are of mediocre quality. Just as an experiment I went to the models' list and downloaded two video segments each from the first two models that were listed with a 2000 bitrate, wmv. I also downloaded the same two segments in divx.
Divx was an unmitigated disaster, the wmv files were better but far from crisp and clear as one would expect from something shot as recently as one - two years ago. One video shot in 2004 and downloaded because I really liked the model hit the recycle bin within seconds it was so awful.
The segments are numbered in a most awkward way. Each you will download will be called 01dx (for DVX), 01w (WMV), 01HD (HD) and you will be forced to rename it. Even if a model has two separate sets, both are named the same.
There is no search engine.
Some pictures can be obtained zipped in super size but the choice of pictures is arbitrary!
The regular pictures themselves are only so-so in size and definition. |
| Bottom Line: |
There should be two scores: One for what FTV are offering NOW (for that I would give them a ninety even if the updates ARE slow) and one for the rest of their material which is really mediocre in my eyes. The girls are great and are doing some daring things in a natural way which I find appealing but what good is that if the picture is small and blurred as is so often the case with the older material.
September 16: I will not lower the original score because the site deserves it but the more I read the site's derogatory comments on some of the models' looks or performance, the angrier I got.
It is demeaning to them and uncalled for. Let us users make up our minds if someone's body needs "tone" (a comment in today's update) or if their actions weren't as enthusiastic as they could have been. This site will NOT be revisited by me. |
|
08-22-08 08:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
74
|
FTV Girls
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Tons of content, all archived
+ Hot young models, most are unknowns
+ Some good videos, with masturbation, anal, toys, including some in HD
+ Pretty easy and simple navigation
+ Selected photos are available in gigantic sizes (2000 x 3000!) |
| Cons: |
- Normal photos could be a lot bigger and clearer
- Content can get repitive and boring, sometimes pretty softcore, even for a girl-only site
- Downloads could be faster
- Too much clothed and public nudity scenes
- Not every model has videos
- Better content descriptions needed for the model listings (it's not clear whether something is in a video or photo) |
| Bottom Line: |
First off, this is a huge site - lots of exclusive content, available to all users. Unfortunately, all this content was not created equal. A model could be doing some big insertions in a scene, but half the photos will just be of her undressing, or doing some stupid public nudity, and this gets frustrating very fast. The vast majority of these women are very attractive; it just takes too long to see them nude. The photos themselves are good, but really way too small (1100 x 800 max). There are huge photos available in a big pics section, but they are only available in zip packs, so you have to DL a whole scene (some 100mb+, a slow DL on this site) just to get a few good ones.
This site gets high marks for the sheer amount of content available, the beauty of its models, and its videos, but they seem to fail to reach the full potential of it all by not offering bigger size normal pics and more nudity (it is a porn site after all). Fortunately, navigating and finding the goods is quick and easy, though they are not always clear what is what on the model listing pages (whether something is in a video or photo), and some stuff I stumbled upon by accident, but it's not mentioned (a few pissing photos, for example). Still, this is not a hardcore site, so if you looking for rough hard content with guys, then this isn’t the place. |
|
04-01-08 12:35pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
75
|
FTV Girls
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Great looking girls
-Natural (no airbrushed crap)
-No music!
-Solo masturbation shoots (NO DUDES!)
-Lots of squirting |
| Cons: |
-VERY Slow download time
-Many low quality pics
-Not enough high quality photgraph/pics
-Not as much content as advertised
-You can find the best parts of vids and better quality pics for free. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV girls is a good site with a great selection of girls that do exactly what I like... High quality solo shoots. Problem is as I see advertised this site is not devoted to PICTURES but VIDEOS. Though they are great quality vids, they take too daggum long to Download! I have found my favorite parts in many of these vids for free. Plus I can find HIGH quality PICS for FREE for my detailed viewing pleasure. If you want to take a look at their content because you can't help yourself go ahead and pay the month fee but I wouldn't go past that time frame cause overall the frustration isn't worth it. They need to make DLs faster and have full photo shoots for me to become a ftv website customer again. I believe you can buy DVDs I'm not 100% sure on that but I think you can somewhere and if they do then I certainly will be buying some. |
|
07-02-09 01:03am
Replies (1)
|
|
