Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Rating
51
|
X-Art
(0)
89.0
|
No Review.
|
05-27-12 04:15am
|
Review
52
|
X-Art
(0)
92.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
The girls here are all absolutely beautiful. If you like Met-Art or FemJoy, you will also really like this site. Although many of the same girls are here, most of them seem a little less inhibited and this is the only place I've seen were so many of them agreed to do sex scenes. Most sets include both images and videos (listed separately under each model's profile) and the videos are not just video of the photo session, they are all well done, dedicated videos. Both images and videos are some of the best quality I have seen on any site. The girls are natural, trimmed or shaved, and solid 9s on the combo body-face scale. Every image and every video is high quality, with no older shoots or videos to dissappoint. Even the music selection and timing in the videos seems well done. |
Cons: |
Well...yes, there could be a little more content. The site, it seems, has only been around since 2008 or so. But in the balance between really good imagery and volume, I'm pretty happy here. I couldn't find a single set or even an image in a set that was just added to create filler. Quality beats quantity every time in this case. For the money, the site is well worth it. |
Bottom Line: |
This is a VERY well done site. The photographers and videographers do a spectacular job of focusing on the girls..and I don't just mean keeping them in focus. The sets, lighting and overall environment combine to create exceptional imagery. The videos seem pretty genuine and there are some really excellent videos both of solo girls, couple and girl-girl scenes. They've managed to tap every single exceptional European and American model. Go look at the model list and you may recognize many of the girls. Most are among the most beautiful in the industry. And, as I said, the crew here brings out the best in them...in every single set. Several of the models look far, far better than I've ever seen them on other sites. Perhaps it is, judging from the fact that many of the sets are in the sun or on an island someplace, that it seems these folks have a decent budget and can afford to take the models someplace really fun for the shoots.
Navigation on the site is good, allowing you to list by update, model names or model rankings. Downloads are fast. Image selection once in a set is good. Select the image size you want, click on the images tab and then any image you click on will open in the size selcted. You can then choose larger or smaller from within each image page (nice feature). Zips are available in several sizes, usually up to 2500x4000 pixels.
The images are all focused, lit and cropped nicely with no odd or distorted angles, giant panoramas or distractions in the images. Perhaps the only personal thing is that there is a slight shortage of images showing the entire model in a natural position (i.e. without the legs or feet cropped). I'm not a foot fetishist, but I do think several complete images of each model once she is undressed would be nice.
If you have been to to the top-tier photography sites like Femjoy, Met-art, Met-Models, Errotica-Archive, Earl Miller, Ron Harris, etc., then you owe it to yourself to check out X-art. If it isn't among the top-tier sites now, I sincerely believe it should and will be soon. |
|
05-13-12 11:13am
Replies (1)
|
Review
53
|
X-Art
(0)
95.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
This site has some very good looking girls and has them in a wide variety of videos and pictures. Most models feature in Boy-Girl, Girl-Girl and Solo, so alot of variety.
-The girls have very good looking body's and faces
-There a few well known models there (Francesca, Caprice, and others)
Videos are in HD resolutions 1920x1080, 1280x720 and some lower resolutions for mobile devices such as phones, iPods and for people with lower bandwidths.
The video & picture quality are amazing. There is alot of attention payed to lighting and the sets, the sets and videos have a very clean look to them.
The videos are all watchable and have a unique feel to them, they don't get boring and repetitive like other sites.
Good download speeds, with support for download managers. There is no daily download limit.
(I used JDownloader and Flashgot) |
Cons: |
Some models only have picture sets and don't show in any videos. But this is only a minor disappointment because the picture sets are normally very good.
Not much content, and isn't updated all that often (2-3 times a week). |
Bottom Line: |
The site has a very dreamy, erotica feel about it, the scenes have a very clean look to it, and would recommend this site to everyone.
The quality was very impressive, the sets were nice (Both indoor and outdoor), the clothes the models wore were nice (For the short period they were wearing them).
One thing i hate with most pornsites with Boy-Girl videos, they focus too much on the guys and not enough on the girls. X-art focuses on the girls mainly, and most of the time the guys aren't completly in the picture.
There isn't that much content, i did a siterip back in september and all up it was about 80-90gb (downloading 1080p videos and all picture sets).
But the price is very reasonable at only $20 US per month.
Here's a list of the video formats and resolutions
-1920x1080, 1280x720 & 960x540 are in the Apple .MOV format
-1280x720, & 960x540 are in Windows .WMV Format (But some newer videos have 1920x1080 in WMV Format)
-They also have a 640x480 for mobile devices but i am unsure of what codec it is
-They have pictures sets which are downloadable as Zip Formats, in high resolutions as high as 4000x4000 |
|
01-03-12 06:37am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
54
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
12-24-11 07:30am
Replies (4)
|
Rating
55
|
X-Art
(0)
87.0
|
No Review.
|
12-08-11 09:29pm
|
Comment
56
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
11-12-11 01:13am
Replies (1)
|
Review
57
|
X-Art
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- Around 130 video scenes and a lot more images (they update 3 times a week, twice with image sets and once with a video, the images go all the way back to 2007 so you do the math, but there are a lot :)
- Videos available in various resolutions up to 1920x1080 HD and images available in 1200, 2000 or 4000 PX.
- Some incredible images of young looking models, for the most part each scene has around 40-60 images and the girls usually start already naked or almost naked. Some very good, artistic shots and a lot of play with light on the girls forms and interesting angles.
- A lot of exclusive models, that look very good (you get to see nice breasts and round forms, but no extra fat)
- Starting to include hardcore and lesbian sex, and the videos are keeping the site's general vibe.
- Good download speeds/ no issues with downloads, log-in or navigation.
- Enjoyed the description of each scene, which although on the long side are nice erotic stories |
Cons: |
- Videos are around 6-8 minutes each and the solo ones feel like they don't have much of a climax. For almost all videos the action starts as soon as the scenes opens, making for a bit of a rough-ish intro.
- I would enjoy a few more outfits (stockings, high heels etc.) A lot of the models are completely naked for the entire scene.
- Some of the models only have a 2-3 photo sets. I'd love it if they could get a few solo sets, a lesbian and a hardcore set from each girl.
- Some sets have as low as 10 photos. The 40-60 range is nice, especially since most girls start out naked, but why not have more images, since they already have the model in the studio and are paying her?
- The vibe of the videos can be either a big plus or a a negative. They start with a musical intro and are edited to feel very erotic/ dreamy. The camera doesn't really do close-ups of the girl, there are white sheets all over and the lighting feels very erotic. It's a unique vibe and some might love it. |
Bottom Line: |
I joined this site looking mostly for some solo shots of girls I haven't seen before. In that aspect the site delivers very well. They have around 100 models and are constantly updating with more girls. They select almost entiurely European and American models and while I wish they had more Asian or black girls, the selection they have so far looks great (Quite a few readheds, different body types and a lot of very cute faces). Also, while they do have a few better known models, for the most part I believe they showcase newcomers to the industry, with a lot of girls I have never seen before.
The photos and videos all have a very erotic approach. There is a lot of focus on light, shadows and forms. The scenes are named stuff like: "Just married", "Young love", "First time", "Sex, love and happiness" and each video starts with an orchestral musical piece that leads into the action. The entire focus is on the models, their supposed innocence and nudity.
There is a particular vibe to the site and it's consistent from the design, the elaborate descriptions of each scene (they are longer than many other site I've seen and each one seems to be unique and thought out, a mini erotic short story for each shot) to the type of models they choose, the locations and action in the scenes. It all feels like an artsy, softcore site although they have boy-girl scenes as well as a lot of toy play and lesbian sex.
If you're into that Teen-dreamy, 18 year old innocence vibe the site is very consistent and delivers excellently with a variety of models and types of scenes. They also have quite a loty of outdoors scenes as well as scenes inside large architectural structures. Very interesting from an artistic perspective and I saved many images to use as wallpapers.
The closest site I can compare it to is ftvgirls.com but here the girls seem to fit into the young adult, innocence niche more neatly than FTV. Also the quality here is much higher and downloads were much faster. Some other similar sites are of course Met-Art and Nubiles, but I'd say Nubiles is more hardcore than this site and Met-Art a more softcore.
Overall you have to make sure you like this type of content before joining since there is no network site to offer different content. Also you have to be sure you like photos since most of the content here is images (although they are updating new hardcore stuff regularly).
Now that we determined who the target audience is for this site I'll comment a bit on the negative aspects. Videos feel too short and many of the photos scenes are also on the short side. While I don't mind 8 minutes of video when they are as well edited as the content on this site. I do wish they would offer more variation. Different outfits, more stripping, foreplay before the sex or lesbian action would be nice.
Also I remember one scene with 3 girls where they only offer 13 images. That seems like a criminal waste. Even if the girls weren't going to do a lesbian scene they could have a few more shots of the three of them touching or getting each other naked.
Speaking of lesbian scenes, right now there is no really easy way to find all boy girl, lesbian or solo scenes. You can navigate the site by videos, all updates or model index. More options would be nice, a category search will become a must as the site grows.
Some more bonuses would also be nice. Right now aside from the main content all the site offers is a behind the scenes blog which is kind of interesting, but not extraordinary (Just some updates on where theya re shootinga and the occasional behind the scenes image). If they partnered up with another similar site they could offer a much better deal. (They do have some live chats, but I don't think they are part of the membership and cost extra)
Bottom line: The site is well done and offers good content even if it's a bit on the short site. Good quality and fast downloads. Hot models and nice boy-girl, toy and lesbian scenes. If you like any of the models in the preview or really like this type of sites X-art could be a good deal. If you want gonzo hardcore, anal sex or a bigger focus on clothing/ heavier make-up, this site will probably disappoint. Don't sign up expecting Brazzers or Reality Kings, sign up expecting a more hardcore version of Met-art. |
|
10-04-11 04:18pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
58
|
X-Art
(0)
79.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Beautiful Girls/Teens, some are wonderful (Caprice, Faye, Blue Angel, and many others)
- The sites shows a particular way of shooting video: short video, plan sex, plan positions, as in a porn romantic age...
-The navigation is simple and the site is plan: all the updates are in one page and you can see the cover of the single update, the rate of the model/teen, the date of the video/pics, differnt video/pics options (various format)
-Three updates/week (regularly)
-Good speed connection and the DM works fine |
Cons: |
-Sex is Plan, too plan..., always.
-Sometimes the camera man cuts the actors in a strange way...I don' understand if it is a mistake or a decision or the Director
-The scenes are Too much "filtered", never sharpe and detailed (too much soft focusing) |
Bottom Line: |
This kind of site could be fantastic or ugly, it dipends on your personal thought.
I don't like so much this kind of Porn: too much boring...
Not anal sex, not crazy positions, too much romantic...., it could be a dream.
Yes, I think that everyone of us have got in mind these fantastic girls that appear in the video like "real angels".
The images are always filtered, enveloped in haze; the shoots (10 min each) aren't sharpe, detailed....but this is the "camera works" and the Direction...
You can like or not... |
|
10-02-11 10:40am
Replies (1)
|
Review
59
|
X-Art
(0)
87.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Good Quality Video 10
Pictures Good about a 7
Sites price and reliability a 8
Fast Downloads.
Reasonable updates timing.
Stunning Women ! |
Cons: |
Limited Picture Set.
Updates slow a few a week.
Some content very tame, some not. Site not consistent. |
Bottom Line: |
Toads Take.
The site is easy enough to navigate, however not all videos have picture sets and not all sets have video. Kinda sucks. There is allot of soft type porn were I almost fall asleep watching it.
There are some women like Marie also know as Satin Bloom and another name I can not recall. Who are sparking this site up with more cutting edge stuff sure to get your pocket rocket to take off.
The site is one of the better quality sites, there consistency is getting better but still lacks a direction of clear organization, but is improving.
I am going to stay a member awhile and see how it goes. Will update as info arrives. |
|
09-14-11 11:04am
Replies (4)
|
Rating
60
|
X-Art
(0)
95.0
|
No Review.
|
07-20-11 06:28pm
|
Rating
61
|
X-Art
(0)
93.0
|
No Review.
|
06-04-11 08:50am
|
Review
62
|
X-Art
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- High quality porn vids and picture sets
- Site lay out is user friendly
- The owners vision is refreshing
- They care for their models before shoots |
Cons: |
- Site content is growing, so, not a ton of it just yet. Photo sets not as good as the videos.
- Serious issues with videos ending up on free sites in very short time.
- Bad editing on some videos, no climax |
Bottom Line: |
A nice, unique art-porn site that features attractvie models having hot sex. Nice picture sets as well and a good selection of models to date. You don't feel like you need a shower after visiting the site in that their affairs are handled with class. They have shown the ability to take experienced models and make them fresh, if not innocent.
Some videos, leave you hanging in that they have an awkward end. By that I mean no climax. Some picture sets have the same look after one becomes accustomed to offerings. Some are as small as ten pics, many are average at best. I think the goal was to make it appear they had more sets. Many of the picture sets are directly from the video, so nothing new. One more thing, videos are fairly short, all under ten minutes.
When I first joined, content was mimimal. After my membership expired they seemed to add a lot more content. Worth one try for sure, but I would wait a good six months for content to catch up after that. Most of their videos end up on free sites far too quickly, a problem many are having in the current climate of on-line porn. Classy site overall, but nothing overly special just yet, but the potential is there. Again, worth a look and I will likely pay anpother visit in six months time. |
|
05-13-11 11:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
63
|
X-Art
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- very beautiful models some exclusive I didn't saw elsewhere
- great photography, very neat and perfect light
- videos are beautiful too
- nice layout, classy and clean
- videos play fast, easy to navigate |
Cons: |
- a lot of sets look all the same except for the girl, same light, same kind of location
- framings are not very original within a set, you will have sometimes 10 pictures in a row, shot from the same exact angle, with very few variations, too bad...
- uneasy to find what you're looking for, you can't even do basic search, only by name by date and by rating :(
- maybe I'm wrong but because of that, I feel that this website contains very few content |
Bottom Line: |
I loved the pictures Mr. Brigham Fields did for his previous website, Goddess. There were creative, with breathtaking models, quite softcore (but perfect for me), very well lit, with different clothings and sophisticated lighting, so I decided to join X-Art last month because of that.
The models are all very well choosen. They are all almost perfect, they tend to be same kind of shape, very slim, look like they are between 18 and 23, with small to perfect breast. no tatooos, no piercing.
When I looked at the first sets I downloaded I was very happy, scenery is perfect, beautiful backlit, very sharp pictures and sometimes very hardcore stuff, and perfectly lit.
Same for the videos, I didn't downloaded the FullHD videos because I don't really need that size, but, the videos in low res were perfect. I think they were shot with those canon 5Dmk2, very cinematic look, with beautiful out of focus things, it looks very professionnal and some are very Xrated which is great to have porn shot like hollywood movies.
I really told to myself that I found the best site ever...
But...
It quickly became all the same, there is very few variation within different photosets, Mr Fields found his style, the backlit washout effect is great, but please, not on all the shots ! You did something much more complex and interesting with Goddess. It's like he had choosen the facility, which is really not a good idea as he certainly is one of the most talented photographer and light technician. And beside, some sets are all shot from the same angle, come on, you're not on a wheel chair ! move !!
So I try to find something different but searching photosets quickly became a pain in the back, there is no real search options. So I quickly gave up. I kept some videos and some pictures because the girls are absolutely stunning and the pictures are perfect taken one by one, but when you look at the whole production, you feel a bit sorry that all look the same. Girls are almost always completely nude, so there isn't even a different lingerie or clothing to keep.
I didn't renew my membership because I feel I won't see anything really new, which is really too bad considering what Mr Fields did in the past...
I would recommend this website but just for one month, there is no need to stay longer because new sets are just copies of old ones. :( |
|
05-07-11 04:11pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
64
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
02-25-11 12:02am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
65
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
02-23-11 10:36pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
66
|
X-Art
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
• Excellent Photo & Video Quality for all Videos
• New Site,Tri-Weekly Updates,Upcoming Schedules
• New Models,Exotic Locations,Nice Themes,Shoots
• Mainly Photos with BG,GG,3Some,Solo,Masturbation
• Weekly single video with Hardcore,Solo Themes
• Unseen,fresh,exclusive footage,no clones here
• Streaming Speeds are very good,no buffering
• Photo sets with 3 grades,view or download them
• Comments,Private Messages & Suggestions welcome
• Good Response to Site Issues-Membership/Content
• Great mixture of light,dark,wheaty complexioned
• HD 1080i Quality Videos,Pictures,Images et al
• Under $20 will get you a month's membership!
• Updates (Mon/Wed/Fri),good for a weekend package |
Cons: |
• Randomly allotted User Name/Password for access
• Highly Cumbersome to recall User Name/Password
• Major difficulties to download with FTP Software
• Bi/Tri Weekly Photo Updates {Multiple Themes}
• Fortnightly Video Updates{Hardcore/Solo Themes}
• Downloads very slow with browser DM's(FF/Opera)
• Searches only by name, not category,date-wise
• Artistic photography site,growing on porn videos
• Emphasis more on female subjects,not male models
• Hardcore Content not full blown,developing now
• Site may appeal more to a connoisseur/enthusiast
• High HD Videos don't play well with most players
• HD Video Sizes are huge & occupy Hard Disk Space |
Bottom Line: |
X-Art.com is a beautifully crafted site with a heady mixture of erotic photos,images & videos so its a very titillating sort of adventure. Yet its content is subtle,inviting & alluring to the viewer. Those used to Hardcore action had better watch out as the pace of things here are a tad low. This explains perhaps why there are so few videos here but there is much to look forward to in the coming months if the site goes with its convictions.
The quality here really brings out the expertise & appreciation of the fact that we're seeing some real professionals at work.Perhaps one day all videos & photo sets will be this way. Its almost as if you are with the model in some of the shots!
Young Nubile Models never seen before really goes well for a photography site & they never forget their roots here which is an important feature. Quite a few sites I have come across get lost in the haze of opportunity & the maze of glory which
deviates from their primary goals. Here its almost
a religion, photography.
All in all, this site's a must for those who crave quality erotica,sex & erotic photography. If that's who you are hop in & enjoy. There's a kind of a youthful flavor & appeal here I must say
Even the fashionable aficionados will surely find something to savor, it surely will not disappoint. Finally those looking for Hardcore Sex & Entertainment will find the site not upto their standards but then again there are several of those where that came from! |
|
01-27-11 05:57am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
67
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
01-02-11 08:38am
Replies (0)
|
Review
68
|
X-Art
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Beautiful ladies from all over
-Good photography and videography
-Good download speeds
-Download managers work
-No DRM
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Decent navigation, model index, and update index, model ratings.
-Photo quality is decent, typically available in three sizes (1200, 2000, 4000)
-Videos are not huge (edited, yay!)
-Video quality is decent (960x540 3500 kbps SD, 1920x1080 16000 kbps HD) SD is pretty crips, HD is very nice. Either Quicktime or wmv.
-3 updates per week, has been very consistent since I've been here |
Cons: |
-Smallish site, 99 models at time of review with typically a couple of photosets per model, not as many of the models have videos - maybe 50% or so.
-Photosets can be short, espicially older sets. Although, in some cases this could be seen as a positive if they removed duplicates and whatnot.
-Videos can also be short, which is probably a con for some, but for the post part I consider it a good thing.
-No bonus content
-No real forum, but you can post comments on sets and there is a blog.
-A lot of toy use in the softcore sets, and not stripping to speak of, many sets start out pretty much nude. |
Bottom Line: |
Overall I think this site is pretty decent. The models are very attractive for the most part and I like the mix of hardcore and softcore materails on a site that focuses a little bit more on eroticism. I definitely like the style of the shoots. I could see how some might complain that the sets are too short of the vidoes are edited pretty substantially, however I find this quite refreshing. Most sites these days post ridiculously long videos with too many closeups and way too much repetitive or unnecessary material (that just ends up wasting hard drive space or wasting my time editing the crap out). So in my opinion it is nice to see a site where they appear to be attempting to trim the sets to the material they think is best.
My main complaint with the site is that it still a little small, and has no bonus content. However, for the price with the PU discount, I think the site is definitely worth joining for a month if you are into well photographed, athletic, young women.
The mix of hardocre and midcore is nice, it would be nice to see a litttle more stripping in the midcore/softcore sets, and given that they have models from all over the place a little more ethnic diversity might be nice as well. While I did like their hardcore material, if this is the only thing you are looking for, this site probably isn't worth joining as there isn't that much of it.
Bottom line for me, with the decent price, I found this site to be worth joining, probably just for a month every now and again, but definitely worth considering. |
|
12-28-10 10:37am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
69
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
12-05-10 12:04am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
70
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
11-16-10 05:10pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
71
|
X-Art
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Stunning models
Young only: 18-21
Many unique college girls
Info about each model, and about each pic set or video.
Quality of pictures and videos is excellent
Great mixture: mostly cute college girls, some first time, but some more experienced
Solo, girl-girl and girl-guy action
Female as well as male photographer
choice of picture and video resolutions
good download rates |
Cons: |
Videos are great quality, but rather short.
Pic sets are great quality, but rather short
Went through a period when I had to keep getting a new password, but that seems to be resolved now |
Bottom Line: |
Great perspectives. The main photographers and webmasters are a male/female couple. The larger HD video is excellent and the larger version pictures are big enough to print out giant posters if you wanted...and you could easily cover your walls with drop-dead gorgeous pin-up babes. It's all very high-class and has a very sophisticated feel...and is all the more sexy for it. Well worth a month or two. |
|
11-12-10 11:53am
Replies (6)
|
Review
72
|
X-Art
(0)
89.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
* Drop-dead gorgeous MET-Art quality nubile models who, for the most part, you haven't seen elsewhere and who are not necessarily eastern european.
* Top quality photo and video shoots, though in smaller quantities than the usual sites.
* Imagine Met-Art with some hc: that's what you get here. There's not much b/g though it's increasing. Fair amount of toy insertion and a bit of soft Met-Art style g/g.
* Virtually no anal, gonzo, or other tasteless stuff. |
Cons: |
* Boy/girl content is very limited but growing.
* No ability to "save" a favorite model.
* No ability to search for particular model types, though with the current relatively small amount of content, this isn't a problem. In fact it's a pleasure to look through the cover shots.
* No slideshow view. This is a must on a photo site of this quality.
* Would love to see a few more models with at least a bit of pubic hair. |
Bottom Line: |
X-Art is that rare thing in the porn world: a truly erotic site. Not only are the models drop-dead gorgeous, but the photographer actually believes in editing. The result is quality, not quantity; eroticism not anatomy. The hc shoots, though limited in number, are tasteful and hot, though there are still far too many of the obligatory facial cum-shots that pervade porn these days. The non-hc content is so sexy that it works for me, even though I usually need a little "more." I also agree with one of the other reviewers that a bit more story-line and less studio shoot would be useful. I'd also love to see some real "behind the scenes" stuff to accompany some of the shoots.
With more hc content and a few more website features like slideshow and save favorite models, I would have given this site a 95. As it is, it's a great site for the price. |
|
10-05-10 10:53am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
73
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
06-06-10 06:56am
Replies (2)
|
Rating
74
|
X-Art
(0)
69.0
|
No Review.
|
02-10-10 08:28am
|
Review
75
|
X-Art
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Pros : beautiful models, some of which are the sexiest I have seen in some time. Lily has to get a mention as one of their top models and her videos set is such high quality even if it is very short.There are now 63 very sexy models with photo sets available in 3 sizes. |
Cons: |
Photo quality is totally inconsistent and in many cases very poor consisting of soft or over exposed photos. For HQ photos there is very little detail.
The videoes are too few and again not all of the same high quality as Lily's. They are also very short appprox 3min in duration. |
Bottom Line: |
I as a picture lover fail to see how other reviewers can score this a 95 which puts it in the same bracket as MET ART, Hegre, Femjoy etc which it clearly is not. I have seen photos on all these sites where you can see the very hairs on the models arms and the goose pimples from a cold room used for the photo shoot. These are not of a similar quality nor is there the same volume of models and photos. Bottom line very sexy models but they are being done an injustice. Improve the quality of the photos and this could bea top site but not yet. |
|
02-06-10 07:09pm
Replies (0)
|
|