Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from badandy400:
(Ricky D Product's Reply)
"Better yet, maybe even sent to the company owner so he could fix your issues." Again read the transcript. I was dismissed right out of the gate. I practically had to break the guy's arm to get a refund that I should not have needed.
I never said that the girl's appearance was an issue. Correct, I am not a fan of tatoos but it is hard to avoid now with so many having them.
Yes, Twistys is ranked very high by me and for many reasons. One of which is their site is easy to get around. They also shoot quality and have been doing it longer.
As for the looks of the main girl herself no one can say anything about it other than a user should look at the main page before joining. That said I knew what she was going to look like before joining and decided $5 was worth a look. Yes, I prefer the "babe" look, but at times my mood is a little different and want something different. So while I may be a little bias I would spell out any bias I have that others may not share, but in this case I did not have bias toward the girl, just the site layout and quality.
I am typically not in your demographic, but then again most people are not. This is a smaller niche site and that is fine. Many of us here join those knowing they are small.
If it nothing you can get at bestbuy and yo have all this experience that speaks even worse for the site because it does not show! The pictures are small, and a lot of the videos are very sub par in quality. Some of the videos do look okay media wise, I will give the site that.
"Reviewers like you are the reason sites do limited trials and why the smaller producers are nearly gone." Why, do they feel they need to hide behind limited trials? Is it because they know they do not have much to offer and do not want to show their hand until after we pay the full price? Or is it something to do with the site being able to be downloaded in under two hours?
I have given good reviews to extremely small sites when they offer something unusual.
The trouble is that you are getting away from the main topic. I have a terrible time canceling this site. Perhaps that is what need to be addressed. I can see that you share the same style of customer service as the payment processor does.
|
12-19-10 10:56am
|
Reply
2
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(Ricky D Product's Reply)
"...but with false reviews like these..."
So are you denying the transcript posted in the forum?
I did not put down the site for not being large like some of the other. I have been around the porn block a few time, I know what is out there. I did not go in expecting 5000 GB of HD stuff. I was looking for something other than a bunch of webcam recording and POV content. It comes off as very amateur, something anyone could do with a HD camera from bestbuy a guy and a girl.
I have done a number of reviews here so people have gotten to know my style and get a feel for what I look for. Those looking for the same thing will not like your site, thus should avoid it. Others look for different things and may like it, and since they know they feel differently about certain things it may not affect their decision to join. We are just trying to get the facts out and voice own own opinions whether others agree with them or not is up to them.
"We've never had any issues with members canceling their memberships..." we you have now had at least one. The link at the bottom of the pages directed me to epoch, not who I signed up through.
Lastly, those members who have been around since 2007 for this tiny site would likely not be taken too seriously. They obviously have an extreme bias and we strive for unbiased reviews here because those are the kind that help us.
|
12-18-10 09:39pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
