All Internal (0)
|
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Hardcore European porn with creampies in nearly every scene.
- 518 models: body types are average to slender, many flexible models and all are attractive.
- Male dominant niches including anal, dual penetration, creampies and threesomes.
- 579 scenes, site updates with 2-4 scenes per month.
- Video quality is superb (including 4K) and can be downloaded without restrictions.
- Each scene includes a downloadable photo set that is professional quality and downloadable screen caps.
- Includes access to the excellent Perfect Gonzo network which includes 8 sites total.
- Biller is Epoch
- Impressive tagging system. |
Cons: |
- Sameness in scenes, location looks to be the same room, same couch and there's little diversity (race, shape) in the models.
- Could be too hardcore for some, gaping, near prolapse and choking, dominance by the male talent.
- Gap in content causes older videos to be less impressive in quality. |
Bottom Line: |
The sites you receive with Perfect Gonzo include: All Internal, Ass Traffic, Prime Cups, Sperm Swap, Cum For Cover, Tamed Teens, Pure POV and MILF Thing. Each site stays within its niche and rarely goes outside its niche.
The video quality is a real plus here especially if you like 4K. Currently they have 226 scenes with 4K, giving them nearly half of their videos in 4K. There is a gap in the content. From 2009 - 2013, there were no scenes. This creates a situation where 400 of the scenes have at worst 1080p and 200 have at best 480p. This is disappointing as the model diversity was better in the older scenes. The videos are still watchable, but they pale in comparison to the newer ones in terms of clarity and crispness.
The photo sets are impressive as they are studio photo sets and if you like screen caps those are available too.
You also will notice that the aforementioned gap in scenes changed the setting. Nearly all of the scenes from 2014 - current are in what looks like the same house, on the same couch and rarely changes. The scenes before the gap were in various locations, different colored rooms, different colored couches and even have outdoor scenes mixed in.
The tagging system allows this to be made clearer. If you choose "outdoors" tag, you find that there are only 20 outdoor scenes since 2014 and you also find that the tags aren't completely accurate as a brown couch in front of a fireplace is not outdoors. Prior to the gap, there were 60 outdoor scenes and they're all outdoors. You can also use these tags to see the change in model diversity. If you choose "dark" in skin tone, there are 3 scenes since 2009 with dark skinned models, while they still only had 12 prior to 2009. Where you will see the "sameness" con is when you click on "sofa" tag. As it shows 142 scenes just since 2015 were shot on the same white sofa. It gives the scenes an oddly clinical feel.
It could just me. I would like to see more variety, but the content itself is very good for hardcore porn. The scenes are long, often nearing an hour and rarely going below 45 minutes. The scenes though in gonzo style do run the full gamut of sex from starting out with the models all dressed, kissing, stripping, fingering, handjobs, toy play to every position of sex the body can be contorted to. There are threesomes, even a few foursomes (male/male/male/female) and group style of two male/female couples. The sex is often rough and even furious. More than half of the scenes feature anal and over 50 of the scenes are dual penetration. They take their creampies seriously; 266 scenes have anal creampies, 276 scenes have pussy creampies, this tells us nearly every scene has a creampie in it and some of the dual penetration scenes have more than one creampie.
The only negative there for me is it continues the sameness feel. This site and the included sites in the network seriously follow their theme and I think that sometimes becomes redundant. At least the women are very attractive. The site and network as a whole works very well. The navigation is simple to use. The tags can be overwhelming, but that's better than no tags. It's a very good site in an overall excellent network. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|