| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
jd1961 (0)
|
DRM is censorship and spyware IMO.
|
11-29-08 01:09pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Toadsith (0)
|
Sadly this is the problem with 6 month old reviews - GGG went DRM-free officially on November 27th, 2008.
I see that you note this in the pros, but the only thing taken away from a cursory glance a user would be that the site uses DRM, and that is simply not the case. It would be appreciated if the Cons were changed to "Used to use DRM" as that would be accurate.
|
11-29-08 04:33pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
jd1961 (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Toadsith :
He's right, you should edit that out.
We need to applaud sites that drop the evil DRM.
|
11-29-08 05:56pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
RipRap (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Toadsith :
That was only 2 days ago. Plus, I do not take the word of any site that has used DRM in the past.
Once VERIFIED by myself, my wife and other PU dot cum members, I will Re-Review GGG.
DRM is WRONG. Shame on them for using it in the first place.
If they truly removed ALL of their DRM, I am sure the reviews will reflect that.
http://www.info-mech.com/drm_flaws.html
|
11-29-08 10:15pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Toadsith (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - RipRap :
Yes - DRM is definitely a major flaw for a site and agreed, shame on them - but much love to them for finally seeing the light! I just didn't want users to be scared away from a site that has so bizarre but quite interesting porn. Thanks for updating the review :-)
|
11-29-08 11:03pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
I am baffled by this review. If the DRM has really been removed, and other reviewers confirmed this, why give the site such a low score? It doesn't seem fair to submit a NEW review that deducts points for crimes that no longer exist. I think you should have waited until you resubscribed before writing the above or put your thoughts under "comments." I truly can't see where this is a valid review, sorry.
|
11-30-08 08:46am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
RipRap (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #6 - messmer :
Sorry to see you did not understand my review.
I clearly stated that I was basing the review on my PAST experience with GGG. I LOVED the content. It was the DRM I objected to.
I have also said that just because GGG says they removed ALL DRM a few days ago, I DO NOT BELIEVE IT UNTIL I SEE IT.
BTW, 75 is a pretty decent score for a DRM site. I would have given it less than a 40 if it were not for the superb content.
I am now reviewing ALL of the videos available on GGG. Once that project is done, (Pheww) ;-P I will re-review GGG.
Until then, I still consider them a DRM "suspect site".
We'll let you know how things cum out.
|
12-03-08 07:04pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
RipRap (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #5 - Toadsith :
Toadsmith,
You are very welcome.
I am open to criticism and try to look at things from all POV.
I'll be busy doing lots of GGG, so it may take awhile to add new reviews, but I am sure you understand that there is a LOT of HARD WORK to do.
|
12-03-08 07:08pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Toadsith (0)
|
REPLY TO #8 - RipRap :
LOL - indeed I do, indeed I do. Good luck, and gods* speed!
(*Polytheism is more fun!)
|
12-03-08 08:02pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #7 - RipRap :
I read the review very carefully. I do that with all of them because I might be tempted to subscribe one of these days and who's a better guide to a site than a fellow PU user. I just couldn't understand writing a retro-review marking a site low for DRM after that main irritant had been removed according to other trusted PU users. Nothing personal in this. I am just using logic. If it were me, I would go to a site that still hasn't dropped DRM and leave a remark there voicing my disgust with their business model rather than chastise someone for past offenses. Cheers.
|
12-04-08 08:14am
Reply To Message
|
11
|
fiou (Suspended)
|
Anybody knows how to cancel from germangoogirls? I tried epoch and I get an error message. It is really epoch the billing company? Not clear on the website and I never gor an e-mail confirmation of my subscription.
|
06-24-09 12:43pm
Reply To Message
|
