Comment Replies (3)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
I put more weight on the comments and reviews by PU members that I trust and understand than on the scores or reviews of TBP. TBP scores are harder for me to relate to or understand. Drooler and other PU members are paying customers like me, while the TBP reviewers are professional reviewers with a different point of view that has less relevance for me. That's my personal opinion.
I usually agree with and understand the reviews of sites that Drooler reviews or comments on that I have been a member of. Our tastes are somewhat similar. Not exactly the same, but close enough that if Drooler finds a site to be excellent and well worth the money, chances are the site might be worth joining for me. (He does not find a lot of those excellent and well worth joining sites, because he has a lot of contrary opinion and orneriness. Maybe old age is biting him in the ass, or maybe he was ornery at birth. But you can depend on him (and some others) to give a somewhat clear and understandable review/opinion of different sites. I don't get the same sense of understanding from the TBP scores or reviews. TBP scores and reviews have value, but it's easier for me to relate to the PU scores and reviews of members I trust and agree with because I have read their reviews and comments and understand more clearly what they are saying.
If this site has some special attributes that definitely appeal to you, then maybe it's worth joining, in spite of Drooler's negative comments. He made those comments a little over a year ago, and maybe the site has improved since then.
But unless you have some clear evidence that the site has drastically improved since Drooler made his negative comments, or unless you have a strong impression that there are special elements that will appeal to your personal tastes, then this site is probably a mistake or a waste of your money.
You're probably better off paying for another site, but I don't know of any specializing in softcore Asian. There are some very nice-to-excellent hardcore Asian that PU members have reviewed.
Wait. I recall one softcore Asian site, don't remember the name. I will look around and, if I come up with the name, will offer it as a possibility. The site was like a Met-art Asian clone (but not really associated with Met-art).
|
02-02-10 11:29am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
GCode (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :
Thanks for a detailed response and opinions. I am totally 100% with you on the weight of PU reviews over TBP. However, one of the reasons I was trying to found out more is that fact that this comment was over a year ago and sometimes (most of the time no, I know) sites change things they are doing wrong and improve. So, I suppose I was attempting to see if anyone joined the site recently and can compare with Drooler's negative feedback. Then, maybe they would know if the site has stayed the same or improved based on these comments. Until that happens, I would never join this site based on what Drooler has been through and commented on.
I usually skim through new and old TBP reviews that have decent reviews, then go straight to PU to see what has been said about sites. Usually the combo of TBP, PU, and the tour (with the PU comments pulling the most weight) is what helps me whether I'll join a site or not.
I have stumbled upon what are considered average or maybe slightly above average Asian softcore sites but I have only come across one site specializing in this category involving Asian Americans from the company Grooby. Maybe the site you are talking about is 88 Square? I've been trying to dig out Asian American sites for awhile to no avail, maybe something will pop up someday.
Thanks again for your response and intuition. The site probably has not changed shit and until I can get a clear cut answer otherwise, I will be moving on :)
|
02-02-10 11:57am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - GCode :
There is a site called Asia Nude 4 U that has a mix of softcore/hardcore with models much like the 88 Square site. Some of the models at Asia Nude 4 U are extremely pretty. Asia Nude 4 U is not extremely hardcore, but much more hardcore than Met-art, which is strictly softcore.
But 88 Square and Asia Nude 4 U are not really the site I was thinking of when I said there was a Met-art clone of Asian models. This is a site (or was, I don't know if it's still around) with high-quality softcore photosets of Asian models.
I'll try to remember the name of the site, but my memory is terrible, and the exact name might take a few weeks or longer.
Do you personally enjoy Met-art? If not, then you wouldn't enjoy the site I am thinking of, unless you get an extra special kick from Asian models. I think some Asian models are just gorgeous, and there are plenty of pretty ones as well, but tastes are personal.
If you like the Met-art site, I will try to keep digging for the name. The models were Asian, not Asian-American, I think. There are a very few Asian models at Met-art, but hardly more than a handful out of the 100s of models they have.
|
02-02-10 05:03pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
