| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Monahan (0)
|
Thanks for your review. I was aware of this site but it was not on my radar until I saw your review. I'm interested.
The preview site says they add 2 videos a week. Is that accurate?
As a video guy, I shy away from photo sites that have a few videos because they are usually just videos of photo shoots (MetArt, for example).
But the preview site of FEMJOY has some excellent previews of videos that make me want to check it out and drain off their video content, but before I do I'd like your opinion of the video content (quantity and quality).
Thanks.
|
02-02-10 09:17am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
Thanks for the review. I liked your "passionless presentation of the girls" because that sadly appears to be true in many sites these days. You just saved me some money! :-)
|
02-02-10 09:56am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
adrenalinrush (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Monahan :
Since 2010 they seem to have irregular HD video updates. As far I have recognized it every 9-10 day now.
The release informations are public, check the site to see for yourself.
|
02-02-10 11:42am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Monahan (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - adrenalinrush :
Thanks.
I went back as you suggested and found the update schedule. They had a total of 4 new videos in January, not quite the 2 a week they promised in their preview site. But the previews they offer for the four appear to be quite well done.
But my other question is, what is your opinion about the quality of the videos? With about 300 videos, I am ready to sign up for a month at $30.00 to drain off the good stuff but before I do I'd like your opinion. Does your "passionless" observation apply also to the videos?
|
02-02-10 11:55am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
anyonebutme (0)
|
Just an FYI, you may have noticed, x-art is comprised of work done up by some of the same contributors to femjoy, so probably not the best site to site transition if you're seeking for a new look. I'd suggest checking out watch4beauty.com , or mc-nudes.com
Like on the flip side, I reviewed breath-takers.com and even though the updates come slowly, I felt the quality and passion in the girls is there, then the replies from others were along the lines of "yeah, but not enough updates". Some people want quality, others just want the massive quantity.
To the other questions above, their videos are dedicated scenes, unlike what Met-Art puts out. They are usually 5 minutes in length with a song playing throughout. They certainly lean more art than porn. Not saying it as a bad thing, they are good videos, just don't go in to it expecting something else.
|
02-02-10 12:38pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
adrenalinrush (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - anyonebutme :
There is not much to complain about the quality of x-art, it's just the overall look for the most sites that sicken me.
mc-nudes.com is a good advice and a site I already know. They are one of the few that doesn't seem to care about the mainstream developments.
watch4beauty.com is too artistic for me and breath-takers too expensive for an update rate of 2 per week.
|
02-02-10 01:47pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
adrenalinrush (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Monahan :
The video quality at all is good but the storystelling is mostly weak.
Good looking girls can never eat like normals or ending up making a mess. Another video I saw was a girl climbing on the roof, fully naked.
I think you know what I try to explain, the girls are beautiful but uncertain as long as they get instructed by someone behind the camera. Mechanic smiles and abrupted movements are routine in the videos.
Nevertheless, you should check the videos by yourself to build your own opinion. They seem to have a couple of full videos for promotional purposes online.
|
02-02-10 02:00pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
propaGhandi (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - adrenalinrush :
adrenalinrush, thank you for your review - itīs in line with mine.
mc-nudes.com is my recommendation and red-hot favourite in that niche.
|
02-03-10 01:57am
Reply To Message
|
