Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
pat362 (0)
|
I don't know if Diesel opened a new division in America but this site and the Diesel ones are all handled by Lioness Queen of Content delivery. Does that mean that this is the company that designed the sites or the parent company for many different sites?
|
05-13-12 10:07am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
Pat362 seems to be our resident expert on source material for porn sites. I can't add anything to what he says.
If Wow was added to the Diesel network, I'd like to check the site out.
But as a stand-alone site, I just don't have the cash to look.
|
05-13-12 12:09pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - pat362 :
Sorry to ask a follow-up on this, but what is Lioness? I can't find anything by Googling it.
|
05-13-12 04:48pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :
I wonder if part of the reason that it wasn't added to the Diesel network is precisely that it wouldn't generate any income. Setting it as a stand-alone site forces people to pay for it. In a lot of cases I'd see this as a cash grab, but for a site like this (and most of the others at Diesel) the quality makes it worth the price. Diesel, and now Wow, do some great porn. Many other sites could take lessons from them.
|
05-13-12 04:51pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - rearadmiral :
Scroll to the bottom of Wow Girls and you will see what I mean about Lioness. Then do the same thing for young legal porn. They each have the identical Lioness logo. I don't know why but I do know that both sites/network have an identical setup I also tried to Google Lioness but I didn't get any hits.
|
05-13-12 04:53pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - pat362 :
I see that now. Thanks.
|
05-13-12 05:02pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - rearadmiral :
The main sites at Diesel have great quality in their videos. I am less impressed with their photosets, which are, in my opinion, below the outstanding photosets you get at Metart or MPL Studios, even though the models at Diesel are lovely.
But like you say, making Wow a stand-alone site is an attempt to generate more income.
|
05-13-12 07:14pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #7 - lk2fireone :
I'm not a photo collector so I really can't compare these to other sites, but I do collect photos of my favourite Diesel models. In terms of technical quality they can be great. The resolution on some of them is the highest I've ever seen.
I agree with you on the models. I don't know how the do it, but the models are incredible.
|
05-14-12 06:35pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
dieselman (0) Webmaster
|
Please read my reply in other thread.
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=71347
Thank you :)
|
05-18-12 03:47pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
steveosaurus (0)
|
REPLY TO #9 - dieselman :
A suggestion:
Not only are the girls in Diesel sites above average quality, but the props (dildos,etc) are often as well.
Some are easily identified, others not.. I wonder how well a sex-toy store as part of the site would do? Perhaps limited to props used in various clips.
for example, my girlfriend was very interested in a particular suction-cup-to-a-glass-table-dildo in a Young Legal Porn clip called 'Elizabeth, Jerking, thinking about you" - and I would enjoy being able to buy it from the same site that provides such high quality films.
Perhaps the trailers for the clips, or site meta-data could list prop source links, with commission agreements with the vendors...
Has this been discussed already?
|
08-26-12 01:04pm
Reply To Message
|