Poll Replies (4)
|
Replies to the user poll above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Capn (0)
|
1200 x 800 is sufficient.
Cap'n :0)
|
02-19-14 01:04pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
atila9999 (0)
|
1200x800 enough for me
|
02-19-14 03:02pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
LPee23 (0)
|
1200x800 seems to be winning so far. Maybe because that's the size that starts to show up as a full screen on a good sized monitor? Of course, bigger can be much, much better, and I like to see active sites shooting in 3000x2000, but I still enjoy some of my older pics that are much smaller.
I have some older stuff in 900x600 that is among my absolute favorites from the early days that still looks quite good.
The absolute limit for me is 640x480. Actually, 99.9% of stuff at this size is too low res for me to possibly enjoy, but there are a couple of rare shots in my collection that are so amazing in their content that despite this low resolution, they still are enjoyable. It probably helps that I first laid eyes on them back when that resolution was the norm.
Below 640x480, it doesn't really matter what the picture shows, it's really not possible for me to enjoy those. I might look at one and say that it was an interesting shot, and wish it was done in higher resolution, but I just cannot get past the low quality with photos like that. Sure, I still keep what I have from the early days, but with photos this small, it's for "historic value" only. I think I am wise to keep this stuff, because some of it is so old it is impossible to find now.
|
02-19-14 06:41pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I've been really digging the facial expressions of some models, and I like to zoom in them, so I chose 3000x2000. Sometimes a nice expression is in a rather distant shot.
Oh, that's true for other aspects as well.
|
02-22-14 02:30pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
