X-Art (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Another first time join for me. A heartcore site with a lot of high quality content.
- Others might not agree on this, but I prefer the pictures on this site to the videos. And the videos aren't bad at all. The pictures are just that good. (Will praise more in-depth in BL).
- Very pretty, natural models.
- Updates aren't daily, but looks like they average 2 videos a week and 3 picture sets. Or at least have since I've been a member. One week was just 2 photo sets and 2 videos, but they could use a little more structure and order to the updates.
- Uses CCBill as biller, been a long time since I joined a site that uses CCbill.
- Good amount of solo sets which I still prefer, but has plenty of boy/girl sets, boy/multiple girls and some girl/girl.
- Some 4k videos for those who want those. Still not really a big deal to me. Videos have 1080p option dating back as far as I have looked.
- Should have started the pros with this. Photo sets start with model(s) clothed! |
| Cons: |
- I really hate this one since otherwise this site is near perfect. The navigation is a pain in the ass. It's not terrible, it works well, but there's one long page of updates. Hopefully you like scrolling. You can get around this by going to the model list, but I don't know most of these models. They have a drop-down box that allows you to filter with like 4K only, photos, videos, so that's why I say it's not terrible, but even after filtering, you're back to scrolling.
- Could use more girl/girl. I could even do without the boy/girl on here.
- The old "that's not really a con" con, would like more photos in the picture sets. |
| Bottom Line: |
For whatever reason I've avoided joining X-Art for years. I think it has to do with my frustration with the heartcore-boom from a few years ago. It was everywhere, even on hardcore networks.
I think it creates a philosophical problem for me. I just can't see something staged ... as love. Not to worry, it's why I also don't watch mushy television shows. I know they're actors and the stories are fictional.
Outside of that, the only real fault I can find on this site is the navigation. I really don't even know what would fix it? Either way, I scanned as far as I could to see when the 1080p videos became available and after using hyperscroll for nearly a minute straight, I made it to 2010. Those had the 1080p option. The problem with this long scrolling screen is it causes a computer to lock up as it loads more scenes. I'm usually working on something else when checking porn sites out so I have to stop whatever I'm doing.
Hard to believe that's a complaint, but my PC is on the higher end. I don't know if that would muck up an older computer or not.
The rest is good. Models, much like Wow Girls, are really pretty younger women. I want to say there's a little more variety here with body size, but it wouldn't be a big difference. These models all look like fit college girls. I can tell because my wife has girl-crushes on college girls and she really likes these models.
One thing I will compliment that probably isn't mentioned much is these girls look more like regular girls than glam models. Which is really great for me. A couple that stand out right now for me are Lily Ivy and Melissa Moore. They both remind me of girls I see over at the local college. Especially in their dressed pictures.
Which is another big plus that's probably not mentioned much. All of the picture sets I've looked at start with the model in clothes. It's usually regular everyday clothes like a tank-top and shorts, some of the multiple people photo sets start in just underwear, but that's even better than starting out nude.
The solo videos are as good as any site's solo videos, believable, passionate masturbation. The girl/girl videos are also believable. The boy/girl videos are okay. It's the same problem with all heartcore sites. Heartcore tries to sell too much realism. I don't like realism in my porn and seem to become cynical towards it. No big deal though, some will really like those boy/girl scenes.
The photo sets could have more pictures in them. Quite a few are under 50 photos. Usually 100 is a good number. It's not really a complaint since I'm saying I would like to see even more. The photo sets can be downloaded in 1000, 2000 and 4000 high end. Download speeds are excellent on both photos and videos. I'm downloading the videos at 7 MB/s, which is above average for me.
There's only so much praise you can give a site. Having CCBill as a biller is even a big plus these days. Very pretty models. High technical quality. Models dressed at the beginning of photo sets. Downloadable photo sets. Fast download speeds. That nearly fulfills my entire mental checklist of what I want from a porn site, but there is the clunky navigation and the similar build/race models to complain a little about. Though neither of those are enough to pull this site down. I consider it a little better than Sex Art and put it well above Wow Girls.
I'll go as far as saying it has made my list of sites to return to. That list is very small these days. Would recommend it to everyone.
Edit: didn't remove any points for a minor annoyance, but wanted to mention it. When I first joined and signed in, it took me to a community page. I don't have much interest in community pages on porn sites. I thought I had joined something besides a porn site. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
