Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan (0)

Newbie
65*
calissa (0) 01-07-17  12:14pm
Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: --attractive models, usually
--high-quality photo techniques
--decent collection of models
Cons: --more clinical than erotic
--the site emphasizes youthful (legal) females, which means lots of pigtails and the like, which is silly at times
Bottom Line: I admit it: I've never understood why guys go gaga over this site. Yeah, I know the girls look younger and cuter, and they're willing to push the limits, but too often this site turns models into sideshow freaks, using odd contraptions and (occasionally) human assistants to show us just how far a vagina can be stretched. So hot. Not. Future gynecologists probably benefit from the site, but this isn't erotica, folks. In fact, in most photos, the models look anything but turned on: they're amused or speechless or bewildered. Similarly, I'm speechless and bewildered, too -- by the over-the-top reviews of ALS.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

elephant (0) Yeah I do think its a strange site, don't get me wrong I've seen some great stuff there when its real girls being themselves candidly and having fun its awesome but they do mostly stuff I'm not into and thats videos of them doing these photoshoots, not my bag so I don't join the site often. I'd love them to have more vids of girls together having fun or girls solo just doing things naked, there are some videos like this, one that springs to mind is Ashley I think she is called on the siberian machine or something like that I think its called and she's talking us through, really liked that kind of interaction, think they should do more.

The stretching and shoving pens in vaginas does nothing for me either.

01-08-17  01:19am

Reply To Message

2

calissa (0) REPLY TO #1 - elephant :

Thanks for sharing, elephant. They do have attractive women on the site, so it would be nice to see more naturally erotic stuff. Agreed.
01-08-17  04:15am

Reply To Message

3

Pyrenees (0) REPLY TO #2 - calissa :

That's a great review Calissa. I personally would never join this site. I do not see its appeal. If you could tell them 3 things they could change and make a huge difference in their subscribership for the positive what would those suggestions look like?
01-08-17  06:46am

Reply To Message

4

calissa (0) REPLY TO #3 - Pyrenees :

Hi Pyrenees - Thanks for the reply. The first and most important recommendation would be to make the solo shoots more artistic and less driven by "extreme" content. The models on ALS are often attractive enough to be very enticing -- if they're given the opportunity to pose in erotic ways. And as a second (and related) recommendation, I'd like to see the models pleasure themselves genuinely (and not merely acting for the camera). Think of a site like I Feel Myself. Some of those women are quite beautiful; some are less so. But when they're caught up in the throes of passion, it's a highly erotic experience (if you enjoy that sort of thing). Let the ALS models -- or at least some -- bring themselves to orgasm, and capture that event on camera and film. Third, stop trying to turn every model into a barely legal teen. Let them be themselves -- shaved or trimmed, pigtails or not.

Now, I recognize that for a lot of guys who are into ALS, they like what they're getting now. So maybe I'm proposing another area of ALS for those who crave more natural, erotic, artistic fare with attractive models. As is, I don't see a whole lot of diversity in the approach ALS takes to shoots. (Strange objects, fists, stretching, etc.) That's not a gripe -- they obviously have a loyal following for what they do -- but you asked about upping the subscriber rolls, and I think the approach I'm suggesting may have some effect. It will attract a more classy clientele, anyway. ;-) And it may make the site more appealing for models who aren't into "extreme" content.

01-08-17  12:29pm

Reply To Message

5

HawkesB (Suspended) Well said. :)
03-10-18  11:18pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.