i joined the trial which says it gives full access to the site. however when you join it says the content from 2015 and newer is at a different site and that the trial subscription will not work there. this is bait and switch. i emailed ccbill and they said oh well.
"The scenes here look great. The videos are high definition, playing at 1800k and 1280x720 in size. The photos are large at 1280x720. Everything is sharp, well-lit and professional-looking. I was really impressed with the overall quality here."
There still is a full access three day trial for $9.95. I see the newest videos are in high quality 1280x720 and about half of the older videos have been remastered to 1280x720. Being remastered, they are not as sharp as those being shot now.
Despite a couple of replies from the Webmanager to my earlier comments saying that this would be updated, there is still no recent updates featured on the non-member homepage.
If you take a good look at my reviews, you will see I don't give too many sites high ratings. In fact sometimes I have been critical of sites that others have rated much higher. That being said, I read with great interest the updated reviews by the TBP editors. To summarize, I feel that they are critical of aspects of the site that are of only a low level of importance. After you join a site and download what you want, do you really remember if the site has a plain design? Who cares? Certainly not me. If I see a site that is unusual in its content and creativity, I am happy that it also has a large amount of content. You won't hear me complain that it may have a been a bit slow to download. Six months later you have videos that you still watch and forget what the site even looked like, let alone if you may have wasted a little bit of time. I use download managers and then leave the computer, so how is that critical to my rating of a site? All four reviewers said great things about the site, but not one gave it even an 80 score.The only time I would care about the superficial is if a site is a complete disaster in its organization, site design, or download times. Overall, I think PU is usually much more informative than the TBP reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
