Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company Hampton Trading Ltd.
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-7 of 7  

Visit All Boys 19

1. All Boys 19 (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
merc77 (Disabled) 05-05-18  02:57pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Cute Models

-Model and video catalog to aid in one's decision to join this site

-Somewhat decent photosets
Cons: -No new material in years. Even the recycled updates have stopped.

-Extremely slow download speeds

-Many of the videos available on sister sites.

-The site does not have a one time charge so it will renew even though it does not update.
Bottom Line: One of the sister sites of Mike18 which is actually a bit above the usual quality. The boys are cute and the downloads are available in MP4.

As a general rule, if there is no model or video index then do not join the site. The videos will only be available in WMV, a platform that is not supported by a lot of video sites. Many sites have yet to update their older stuff to MP4, but this site has.

The MP4 files are smaller than the WMV files but of the same viewing quality. I can convert MP4 files to DVD but have a hard time doing so with WMV files. It is good this site shows they are available in MP4.

The site has not updated in a long time. It used to recycle old stuff as new but stopped that. They offer more videos, but it is the same old stuff. I have joined as I am redoing all of my old DVDs and like many of the models.

Speaking of models, they are quite cute on this site. They are gay for pay (which is a turn off) but the solos are nice.

The site does renew so beware of that when ordering. I don't see staying a member when the site doesn't renew.

Bottom line: This site is one where the viewer can see who the models and what videos there are. Use that and know the videos are not Hi Def but the older standard ones.

If one is starting out and likes Russian boys and porn, this is worth the $25 for one month only.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 5 Star Boys

2. 5 Star Boys (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
merc77 (Disabled) 05-05-18  02:44pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Cute models

-A few decent photosets

-Model and Video index
Cons: -No recent updates (although when they did they recycled their material)

-Very slow download speeds

-Content not exclusive to site

-Only one video at a time can be downloaded (no multiple downloads)
Bottom Line: A new look at an old site has made me up its rating a bit. I do like how they have a lot of videos to offer, I don't like they have nothing new.

The site is set up similar to Mike18 in that one can look up models and videos the site has to offer before joining. The site costs $25 a month and renews at the same price. Why anyone would want to renew a site that hasn't updated in a long time is beyond me.

The models are cute and the videos are standard definition. Wide screen and DVD quality does not mean Hi Def. I (and many others) have tried to explain this to no avail.

Most of the videos are of low quality compared to what is offered these days. I am sure at one point in time these videos are great quality.

The download speeds are incredibly slow but the file sizes are tiny so it doesn't take too long. The videos are downloadable via WMV or MP4. Although MP4 is a smaller file size, the quality is the same as the larger WMV file.

If one is starting a collection and finds the boys hot, it is worth joining this site for a month. Just remember it is an older site and the older videos are not very high quality.

Bottom line: Good for a month, cute models, but nothing new being added.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mike 18

3. Mike 18 (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
merc77 (Disabled) 04-13-18  03:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -cute models

-decent photoset quality

-more videos than usual for this family of sites (80)

-$10 first month is a good deal for what you're getting
Cons: -The last update was two years ago (they usually recycle just like the sister sites)

-quality of videos is lacking

-the same models can be seen on other sites like this

-the models are mostly gay for pay and act it

-incredibly slow download speeds
Bottom Line: Of these family of sites, Mike 18 is the best overall quality. That isn't saying much considering the other sites and what they offer.

Mike himself is a cutie and appears in many of the videos. He took a rest and came back with some higher quality videos. The models (and many of the videos) can be seen on the sister sites.

Mike 18 seems to be the first one of this type and they at least keep it in better shape than the others. The download speed is actually a bit higher for this one.

The models are all quite cute but are gay for pay and act bored. They are Russian and mostly not shy about having sex with a friend. There are some ugly models on some of the other sites out there.

For the most part, Mike 18 is worth a look mainly for the $10 starting fee. It renews at $25 a month which is strange as the site has not updated since 2016.

The video quality of the older stuff is quite lacking. They state they are all DVD quality, but we know what that means these days. The early DVDs were made for standard CRT television sets, not the high def computer screens we have today.

I am giving this site a higher rating because of the number of videos in its inventory. If one wants to check these sites out, it is best to start with this one first.

This is a modest recommendation for the newbie who is into Russian twink porn.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 5 Star Boys

4. 5 Star Boys (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
merc77 (Disabled) 06-06-16  12:37pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Cute models (over 80)

-some HD videos available

-no download limit

-good sized photos

-video and model guide to look at before joining
Cons: -recycled videos as updates

-models can be seen at other sites

-many models available on photos only

-most of the videos lack quality
Bottom Line: Another site by the same company who brings us Mike18 (at $25 a month). As with the other sites, the models are cute but may not be in any videos. The good thing about this site is they have a model and video index one can browse before joining.

As for the videos, they are easy enough to download but streaming can be a problem. I find it like this at their other sites as well. I usually download so it doesn't bother me. Downloading can take a while so it is nice to take a look at what you are getting. These sites make that impossible to do at times.

The reason we join these sites is because of the models. They are European (usually Russian) boys who are quite adorable. The problem is they are the same boys as the site has not bothered to make a new video or add new content in a long time.

Basically, the same review for one site fits the rest. They all do the same thing which is recycle older stuff as an update and call it new. It works as there are many young men discovering the world of gay sex out there each year. This might be old to me, but it is brand new to them.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Aaron Cute

5. Aaron Cute (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
merc77 (Disabled) 04-25-16  12:04pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Aaron is adorable

-some decent photosets

-model and video index available which is rare for the site owner
Cons: -not many videos

-even fewer of Aaron

-updates are recycled videos

-videos and some photosets vary in quality
Bottom Line: Aaron is quite adorable and appears in many of the sites owned by the same company. They give him his own site and charge us a recurring fee to view him. They have done this with Mike and a few other boys with Mike being the first.

There is a problem when one can find more Aaron videos on the sister sites of this company. They have a limited amount of videos as I am sure Aaron as well as Mike and most of the other models have long moved on from this business.

The site is easy to navigate and also offers a few bonus videos and sets like the others do. However, the bonus stuff is usually bad quality videos and photos which really should be discarded. They also have not updated any of the bonus stuff in years.

I do wonder if they will eventually start to lose money after users figure out they have no new content and haven't had any for about ten years.

Then again, there will be many new generations discovering these sites and the material will be new to them.

The models are mostly adorable and there is some decent content in this site. It is good for a one month membership but that's about all.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit All Boys 19

6. All Boys 19 (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
merc77 (Disabled) 04-24-16  01:46pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: -cute models

-some hi res photosets
Cons: -updates are recycled videos

-most of the models featured are in photosets

-most of the models can be seen in the site's many sister sites

-quality of the videos varies from poor to fair
Bottom Line: This is another site in the Mike18 family of gay porn sites. It has the same problems as the others with updates being recycled videos and it shares basically the same models with the rest of them.

The models themselves are pretty cute for the most part and some are quite hung. However, the main problem is the videos and photosets appear on so many of the company's other sites. Why pay to be a member of this site after seeing a few of the other sites?

The price structure is the same with the others and has recurring fees. Again, the stuff is recycled over and over so it doesn't make sense to renew.

I wonder if the site owners will ever really blend these sites into one larger site? I also would love to see them bring in newer models and videos. It does seem at one point they did but stopped after doing a dozen or so.

One thing about this site is at least you can see what models and videos are offered. Not so for Washed Twinks and so many others out there.

Hopefully the site owners read these reviews. They may not really care until other porn users start looking at the few reviews out there on these sites and vote with their hard earned cash.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mike 18

7. Mike 18 (0)

Pay
Newbie
78*
merc77 (Disabled) 04-21-16  01:06pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: -many cute models

-some decent photosets

-some HD videos added
Cons: -recycled updates

-limited supply of videos

-many models featured on other sites owned by the same company

-quality of videos varies greatly
Bottom Line: Mike18 is probably the best known of the Russian twink sites. The model is quite adorable and sexy. He smiles a lot and seems to enjoy his work unlike the other gay for pay boys he works with.

Mike has also been around for quite a long time. The site is not really new as it would be called Mike40 by now. It also has the same models so many other sites have from the same company.

Of all the sites in this group, Mike18 is the best and usually has the most content. The problem is they take off much of it so it can be recycled back as an update. When one joins, they don't know what to get.

The site also is one of those notorious ones which has no place to check what models and videos are offered. That makes it even more of a guess work and should be a red flag to those who wish to join.

The price itself varies but has stayed at $25 a month for now.

Some of these sites offer bonus videos but they are usually of low quality both visually and model wise.

If one needs to have Mike in the porn collection, this site is worth it for a month. If one already does, then this site has nothing new to offer.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-7 of 7  


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. None

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.03 seconds.