Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company S-A-Web
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-11 of 11  

Visit Femme Fight

1. Femme Fight (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
PalmTrees (0) 10-11-23  06:40am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + It’s a niche I’m surprised doesn’t have more coverage
+ Amateur models
+ I’m putting this in the pros, The Best Porn review lists a download limit, but that review was from 8 years ago. I haven’t crossed a download limit.
+ More fetishes than you think are being featured in these scenes.
+ You can download the picture sets and sometimes those show more than the videos
+ Pretty ladies wearing nice clothes
Cons:
- I tried Ultimate Surrender years ago, but was bored from the scripted feeling of the “matches”. It’s the same feeling with Femme Fight.
- The site needs to be updated, not the content or updates to the scenes, just the site feels old
- Video quality should be better across the board
Bottom Line: I like the idea of women wrestling or fighting each other. Especially if I feel like the models are bicurious. Somewhere in my mind, that’s how all bicurious starts. Two women get mad, start fighting, pull each other’s clothes off and bicurious feelings appear. It’s really unlikely that’s how it happens, but it’s realistic enough for my imagination to run with it. I think the best known site of this niche is Ultimate Surrender and it’s good, but you have to keep your imagination involved or you realize you’re just watching a porn scene with a heavily scripted story.

Femme Fight may do a better job of staying in my imagination. The women are dressed normal or professional. Unlike in “wrestling” outfits. The scenes all follow a similar pace and script. I think this is a more modern take on mud wrestling without the mud. The women start fully dressed and grab hair, rip shirts, pull bras off, tear skirts and end up having sex.

The imagination part is most important and it is more protected by this style of “fighting”. It’s not promoted as a competition like Ultimate Surrender. It’s trying to be women in normal, everyday situations. I like it, but my imagination has its limits.
I don’t see it as a fault of my imagination or lack thereof. The video quality hearkens back to a decade or two ago. Those older videos should just be removed. I didn’t even know there was such thing as a 200p video. I don’t even use a big monitor, but those videos look like colored ants running across rice. If you can just stick with the newer scenes your imagination at least has a clear chance at surviving the poor to average scripts.

Unlike most of my memberships, I found that the picture sets were often better than the videos. At least for me. This is a genre that relies on suspension of belief or imagination. The pictures don’t move. I even thought of a comparison. If you have ever watched professional wrestling, you start seeing the mistakes or botches the wrestlers make. If you just looked at pictures of the same wrestling match, you likely wouldn’t see any of the pictures of the messed up parts.

It's the same feeling on Femme Fights. The pictures just give a better view for your imagination. I also believe the site should be updated in its programming, it would help make the site seem more up to date. It was better the first week than the fourth week. That’s going to hold my score back a little.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Panty Amateur

2. Panty Amateur (0)

Pay
Newbie
82*
HairyPotter (0) 09-17-23  08:06am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: UK-based panty fetish content
Videos are downloadable up to 2160p
Over 5,000 scenes
All the models are amateurs
The navigation is good
Cons: The price is high for a niche site
There are no pictures
There is a download limit, but I have not hit it
Bottom Line: Panty fetish is my favourite fetish. This site should score higher for me, but there are a few glaring flaws that make it come up short. Starting with the price of nearly $30 a month. I personally don’t have a problem with paying $30 a month for my favourite fetish, but I expect premium quality and features when I pay a premium price. The videos are downloadable and the quality goes up to 4K, but there are no pictures. For me, that’s a glaring flaw. At least for me, the pictures on a panty fetish site are as important or even more important than videos. That’s just disappointing for me. That’s not even close to premium.

The landscape of porn has changed – for better or worse – is not up to me to say, but Panty Amateur is a site that does not particularly fit in with mainstream hardcore sites. The content is softcore. It’s directed towards people who like to see a young, pretty woman in her panties. There is little to no chance you’re going to see much more than you would see in a risqué R or AO movie.

The videos are sharp on a 4K monitor and nearly half of their 5,000+ videos are available to download in 4K resolution. The video action is primarily focused on showing the female in panties. It’s not masturbation or sex. There is some touching and flashing shown, but it’s very timid.

The pictures are a different story. There are no pictures and therefore, no downloadable zips. Watching Panty Fetish in pictures, is really just as effective as videos. Some would even say there’s more to see in pictures than videos. I agree with that, too. Without pictures, this is just an average site to me.

I can’t complain much about anything else. The navigation works well and the site is fast to load. You get to use CCBill for billing and everything on the site works as it should.

My final thought is this site could be much better and should be much better based on the subscription price. There is no reason for a softcore porn site to omit pictures. The videos are good, but I spend more time using VLC to take snapshots. It’s a solid site, but far from best in class.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Panty Maniacs

3. Panty Maniacs (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
HairyPotter (0) 06-08-23  01:29pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: My darkhorse, sleeper site from an entire group of darkhorse sleeper sites.
Cute, gorgeous, stunning, slim, curvy, blondes, brunettes, redheads, all showing off their panties.
Videos are downloadable in 4K and include smaller resolutions for those wanting smaller.
There are nearly 3,000 video scenes and over 1,000 photo sets. All are downloadable, but be wary of the daily download limit (6 GB)
Most of the models are British and have British accents.
Many of the models keep some pubic hair to help the imagination see what’s below the panties.
Cons: I really wish the company that owns this site, S-A-Web, would make a network with all their sites on it. It’s only a con because you are going to have to join multiple sites to see all their content.
The price, considering it’s not a network, is too high for the average fan.
Bottom Line: If ever there was a company that’s avoided the spotlight it’s S-A-Web. They have nearly 20 sites that cover every type of tease porn possible. Upskirts, panties, panty peeks, here’s one for your perverted consciousness – a site where the women are stripped by others.

My single complaint is I have to join multiple sites just to see all of their content. That complaint shouldn’t be viewed as not important. I feel like these sites are dropping in value as standalone sites and it’s a real shame just because they have such a unique and interesting model/view of porn. I think we all have accepted that tease is a major and integral part of all porn and sex. We haven’t accepted that tease truly is its own genre.

It's a darkhorse site and company because I have never heard anyone else mention these sites. The sites are mostly all UK-based and the models, while “amateur” are frequent models on all the tease sites.

The videos and photo sets can be downloaded, but there is a daily download limit of 6GB. Now, you may be seeing why having multiple sites instead of one network is frustrating. If they had a network and had a network-wide daily download limit, you could still bounce around and see content from each site. As it is, if you hit the limit, you will be looking at nothing for 24 hours. The videos are downloadable in 4K on all of the newer scenes and the photos are downloaded in high resolution zip files.

The simplest panty tease scene is more erotic to me than a 20 minute hardcore sex scene. It’s not much different than our earliest arousals of seeing upskirts (in school) and seeing the different color of the panties from the outfit. You then get to look and see what all you can see. Possibly a swollen clitoris and/or labia. Likely, a little bit of pubic hair. That is enough for me.

The women are also of all types and backgrounds. You will see every hair color and body type just on this site. It’s a site that I have been a member of more than 10 times over the years and it’s easy to call it one of my favorites.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ripping 4 Fun

4. Ripping 4 Fun (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
mbaya (Disabled) 12-29-10  06:40am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill without regional pricing
-Unusual, maybe even unique premise for a website.
-Very hot English pornstars and models with sexy accents. There are a total of 156 on the site. Some that I recognized were Lucy Zara, Lolly Badcock, Angel Long, Cate Harrington, Rio Mariah, and Satine Sparks.
-Has a little ethnic variety. There was one Indian and five Black models.
-Excellent quality videos, but not HD. There were 287 videos, WMV only at 960x540, 4066kbps.
-High level of enthusiasm by the models.
-Models talk dirty directly at the camera.
-Most videos are hypnotic. It is difficult to turn away.
-270 photosets, zipdownloadable at 959x1442. Not screencaps, real photos.
-Updates every five days with a new video or photo set.
-Has a forum where they take suggestions, however it is not very active.
Cons: -Too many scenes only go to panties. This may be unfair, but many do go to full nudity. Why not all or at least most?
-Too much focus on destroying clothes that have already been removed.
-Only WMV for downloading or streaming with no options as to quality.
-Videos averaged about five minutes each.
Bottom Line: In spite of a few negatives, this was a thoroughly enjoyable website. I found the videos to be hypnotic, even addictive. That is rare in porn, at least for me.

The premise here is that sexy English pornstars and models cut and rip off their clothes while talking directly to you the viewer. The models show a high level of enthusiasm and the fun factor here is contagious. The direction and scripting are excellent for the most part.

The best videos have the women talking dirty about showing you what they have under their clothes and how much they enjoy putting on a show for you. At their best, these videos go to full nudity with a fair amount of tease, both visually and with words. I loved the scenes where the model pops the buttons on her blouse to reveal her bra, or even better her massive tits. I also loved scenes where the model rips or cuts off her panties to show it all. Unfortunately these are only about 25% of the videos.

The rest show only the models going as far as panties. While these can be hot, I found them to be somewhat unsatisfying. Great models with great bodies, but I was left wanting more. These videos are still very watchable though.

The focus is more on destroying great looking clothes than on stripping. Great if this is your fetish or maybe even if you have a fetish for certain clothing, but I do not. I want more full nudity, not scenes where too much time is spent on destroying either sleeves or clothing that has already been removed.

The outfits range from ordinary street clothes to officewear, to just about anything else you can name, even three scenes with bridal gowns. A few scenes have two models who strip each other. The clothing looks expensive and looks great on these women. The models look very sophisticated and classy.

The videos have several constants. One is great looking models. Another is a high level of dirty talking directly at the camera and you the viewer that builds up suspense. With very sharp, but not HD video quality, I found watching these to be very addictive. Even when they do not go to full nude, I could not take my eyes off the screen.

This is a standalone site. You don't get any extras either. If you think this may be for you, I very definitely recommend givng the site a try.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Fantasy Female Fights

5. Fantasy Female Fights (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
mbaya (Disabled) 12-22-10  08:52am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Unusual niche.
-Very attractive women for the most part.
-Sexy English accents.
-Nice quality videos. The most recent are 960x540, 4068 kbps. Not HD but sharp. Even the older videos are quite watchable.
Cons: -Some fake boobs and or tattoos.
-Poor acting, not very realistic fights.
-The dull photos don't do justice to the action. They are zipdownloadable, but only 960x1440.
Bottom Line: This is an unusual niche, so felt I had to cut it some slack regarding my score. Although there are a few other female fighting sites, few are any good.

In these videos we see British pornstars and nude models fight with each other. In many cases, they start off nude. In others there is a bit of clothing that comes off by the end of the fight. I liked these better.

The fighting is hesitant and definitely tentative. In only a few cases do these models really get into the spirit and show some real enthusiasm. Sometimes the action is so transparently not real that it would make a WWE wrestler blush-and that is not easy.

At about five minutes per video, I felt that they were long enough. Many of the videos were so similar that I thought that I had seen them before. Not true, its just that there isn't much variety in the plots.

The true plus here is the quality of the models. With cute English accents, they generally are quite pretty with bodies that make you forget about the negatives to the site.

My feeling is that the site is worthwhile if you enjoy topless,some full nudity, and almost no cases of lesbian sex. If you want more, Ultimate Surrender is a much better site.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Sexy Satin Silk Fun

6. Sexy Satin Silk Fun (0)

Pay
Newbie
89*
graymane (Suspended) 07-06-10  05:23pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: This site picks up where it's sister site (satin silk fun) leaves off. That is to say here one finally gets to see what's behind the satin and silk.
1) The girls talk to you in that delightful
British accent, as they go through their routines.
2) The slow tease these gals are so good at will have you right up out of your chair.
3) The models aren't short on looks, either. Every one of them presented a unique style and stimulating performance.
4) Not as many models as I'd perfer, but the show they put on makes up for it
4) Video clarity is superb. sharp images with amixture of closeups and great angle shots. All popular medias are available for opening and downloading.
5) Attire is sexy and blends well with the luxurious fabrics, which abundantly surrounds the subject.
6) As the scenes progress the good stuff then materializes as the girls part with the coverup satin an silk and go into their sensual finally.
Cons: 1) As with their sister site, too much Satin'n Silk and a longing for more skin and erotic action.
2) As mentioned, the scenes are relatively short --- about four to eight minutes.
3) Updates are frequent but not extraordinary.
4) Although there isn't a download limit, agressive downloaders will easily run out of choices well before their renewel kicks in.
Bottom Line: In lieu of a possible absence of technical data that advanced users look for in these reviews, let me try and suppliment it by just giving my honest thoughts. First, the $16 bonus package I was awarded for initially purchasing Satin and Silk Fun, got me much more than I bargained for. I found the content well above par and delightful. The clips were sexy and done with class. On the short side, however, volume is somewhat lacking. The sources promoting this site needs to find more girls and stretch the scenes longer.
Well worth the double package -- being offered for only the extra $16 for the full use of this site.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Satin Silk Fun

7. Satin Silk Fun (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
graymane (Suspended) 06-27-10  02:07am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Lovely British models who amply demonstrate their delightful English accent. They are indeed sexy and project the kind of body-language that appeals to a measure of softcore aficionado. If you like the combination of satin, silk and women, especially those who wallow in it, then this is your "spot of tea." The video quality is superb, as well as the pictures. The site offers a special price on their sister site: Sexy satin and silk fun -- which siginficantly relaxes the softcore action and really "gets down".
Cons: Way too much empathis on the luxurious fabrics, which the models use to rub all over themselves for erotic effect. The models' intimate areas are always covered up by the fabrics, so one could argue it's somewhat short of softcore.
But the only persons getting-off here appears to be the models, who're all caught up in the feel of this stuff.
Bottom Line: Great, if you like to see women wrapped up in fine silk and satin -- panties, pillow casings. sheets etc., I found the English models a novel departure from mainstream fare ... but certainly not measuring up overall to true porn.
therefore, The Site delivers but not enough for me to recommend it.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit UK Upskirts

8. UK Upskirts (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
dohboy24 (0) 12-12-09  03:46am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Delivers high quality upskirt pics and vids
Can search by model name
Updates come frequently
Bonus material from their other sites (Pantymaniacs, etc)
Cons: Most shoots have the same theme
Basically no outdoor shoots
Very little nudity
Hardly any shoots use thongs
Bottom Line: Very good upskirt site that could cater more to, what they call 'American panties' (THONGS!). Some nudity would make this site even better. Also, could use more natural settings instead of their typical settings.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Panty Amateur

9. Panty Amateur (0)

Pay
Newbie
92*
Denner (0) 11-13-08  09:01am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Nice, no GREAT site, if you like very softcore - once in a while (if not, do not bother to read on).
Some fine and fabulous looking british girls/women with a sexy attitude, some sexy talk (NOT all) and hot lingerie.
Good amount af ok-quality videos - some newer ones in almost HD.
4,5,6 or more videoclips of the same model - great plus...
Easy navigation
Fine updates - daily - it looks like.
Way over 1000 clips at this stage.
Some very exclusive videos of topmodels like Laurena Lacey (she just got a site of her own, almost) and a doll like Annalease.
You can download more than two videos at the same time...
Cons: Site-design is very simple - and not exiting (but here it's the videos that matters)
No photosets
Most videos only in MPG - a few newer once in WMV.
Earlier videos a bit overexposed or generally not very good quality.
Scenes are mostly quite repetitive.
Some video-clips has disturbing background sound - some even sound like rain and thunder (like in Mickey Newburys songs)
Bottom Line: Cannot not help it, but I really like this site - even if the content is very soft.
No masturbation, no close-up pussy clips, no hc, but some soft lez.
Panty Amateur seems like a sister-site to Panty Maniacs - also british, but based in the Netherlands. And IT IS - a sistersite - or a co. -site.
But compared to the better scored PM this Panty Amateurs has quite a lot more. Foremost a far bigger content, better updates and some much better videos than PM.
First of all the great looking star, Laurena Lacay (here: Lorena) has 10 different videos and none is the same as the three at PM - and far better.
And the big titted and famous Petra here has 17 videoclips - she is also a knockout.
The same goes for a lot of other great british models where the amount of different videos with different outfit for the model is better than the "mothersite" - PM.
Sizes are typical a little under 100 mb which makes it more userfriendly to download.
WMV: 960x540.
No stream.
And no photosets.
Of course it's a bit annoying the way these videos stop before total nudity or masturbation, but ok, this is meant to be softcore and fetish panties - and if you can do with that, this site is great.
Of course I'd like to watch some of these great british model going more hc or just full nudity with some masturbation, but alas!!
Some of the models - but not the "finest" - apears on for exampel Suburban Amateurs with harder content (masturbation) and some in the somewhat similar Only Tease...

Still Panty Amateur is a great site - if you can do with this kind of very softcore...
But, man - I'd like to watch Laurena Lacey or Petra or Annalease in some harder stuff.
Anybody knows where - if at all?
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Panty Amateur

10. Panty Amateur (0)

Pay
Newbie
95*
WeeWillyWinky (0) 02-15-08  05:03pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Site has one mission and carries it out nearly perfectly.
- Video is top quality, with some HD. All vids, even as far back as 05, are top quality: at least 2000 kbps.
- Very attractive British models.
- One new vid every day.
- Tons of content. There may be over 800 videos at present.
Cons: - Scenarios are repetitive.
- No download options. People with slow connections will need a lot of time on their hands.
- Limited nudity.
- Lighting bad in a few vids.
- If silicone were tea, this site would have more than China.
- Longer videos, with a bit more creative thinking, would be an improvement, though five minutes is pretty good for the material as it's currently presented.
Bottom Line: If you are looking for hardcore, masturbation, toys, etc, you will absolutely loathe this site.

If you find that panties just get in the way of the good stuff and feel that they are more of a nuisance than anything else, this site will cause you to become suicidal with boredom.

If you feel that the thong is the greatest advancement in the history of women's underwear, this site will cause you to go postal on your monitor, and then you'll have to buy a new one.

If you feel that a "panty video" should include: panties around the ankles at all times, panties being sniffed, panties being inserted into various orifices, you are encouraged to avoid this site, in the same way that anyone with taste should avoid a Pauly Shore movie.

If you come to this site looking for porn, you will not find it, unless you're convinced that any woman who would allow herself to be photographed topless is a harlot in service to the Lord of the Underworld.

**

I didn't take points off because of the limited scope of this site, because it doesn't claim to be anything other than what it is. This is a video site, there are no pics; it's a panty-site, there's no hardcore. It's a site directly aimed at the panty/upskirt video collector, with a touch of voyeurism and mild sapphic play. If you're not interested in those things there is no reason for you to visit.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Sneaky Peeks

11. Sneaky Peeks (0)

Pay
Newbie
74*
WeeWillyWinky (0) 09-01-07  08:58pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Nifty idea.
- Zip files for pics, which is the only way to go with these kind of pics.
- Videos are of good quality.
- Updated regularly.
Cons: - Small amount of content for the price.
- Vids stick to the core idea but are repetitive and tend to be boring.

- BACK OF SOME GUY'S HEAD IN A LOT OF THE PICS.

- Minimal acting and/or improvisational skills.
- Some REALLY bad boob-jobs.
Bottom Line: I enjoyed two of this company's other sites, Panty Maniacs and Panty Amateurs, and so I thought I'd give this a try. It's not nearly as good as those other sites, but it has potential.

The picture sets are shot in a frame-by-frame style which unfortunately means most of the pics are redundant. They have the look and feel of high-quality vid-caps. Only voyeur and/or panty afficianados need apply. There is some nudity but not much. And too many implants.

Someone had the "brilliant" idea of placing some guy's noggin in many of the photos, which is supposed to enhance the voyeuristic feel of the sets. This is a gigantically BAD idea. Since when did peeping become a team sport? I don't want to look over another guy's shoulder to get a glimpse of some cutie in her unmentionables, nor do I wish to have said unmentionables obscured by a large male cranium which always makes me think of Shaun of the Dead. Tell Shaun to take a hike and I'll hold the cyber door open, thanks.

As for the vids: the quality is very good and looks decent full-screen on my 22 inch monitor. But, I wish these girls would have something to do in the bathroom rather than stand around gazing into the mirror or off into space. I don't mean watersports or anything like that, I mean, give them a task. Let them do something. Most of the time the girls look bored and are overly conscious of the camera. I wind up embarrassed for THEM when I'm supposed to be ashamed of MYSELF.

Some good fun here regardless.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-11 of 11  


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. None

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.04 seconds.